Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub3
All’s WELL that Ends WELL: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutional and Administrative Frameworks of Cyberspace and the United Kingdom

All’s WELL that Ends WELL: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutional and Administrative Frameworks of Cyberspace and the United Kingdom

Jonathan Bishop
Copyright: © 2012 |Pages: 10
ISBN13: 9781613501320|ISBN10: 1613501323|EISBN13: 9781613501337
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-132-0.ch012
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Bishop, Jonathan. "All’s WELL that Ends WELL: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutional and Administrative Frameworks of Cyberspace and the United Kingdom." Investigating Cyber Law and Cyber Ethics: Issues, Impacts and Practices, edited by Alfreda Dudley, et al., IGI Global, 2012, pp. 254-263. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-132-0.ch012

APA

Bishop, J. (2012). All’s WELL that Ends WELL: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutional and Administrative Frameworks of Cyberspace and the United Kingdom. In A. Dudley, J. Braman, & G. Vincenti (Eds.), Investigating Cyber Law and Cyber Ethics: Issues, Impacts and Practices (pp. 254-263). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-132-0.ch012

Chicago

Bishop, Jonathan. "All’s WELL that Ends WELL: A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutional and Administrative Frameworks of Cyberspace and the United Kingdom." In Investigating Cyber Law and Cyber Ethics: Issues, Impacts and Practices, edited by Alfreda Dudley, James Braman, and Giovanni Vincenti, 254-263. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-132-0.ch012

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Constitutional and Administrative Law is a core component of legal studies throughout the world, but to date little has been written about how this might exist on the Internet, which is like a world without frontiers. John Perry Barlow’s “Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace” served to start the debate about the legitimacy of nation-states to impose laws on such a virtual space. It has been argued that the nation-states won as there are now a significant number of laws regulating the Internet on national and international levels. It can however be seen that there are commonalities between the two entities. For example, there are commonalities in the way they function. There are also commonalities in the way civil rights exist, and the existence of civil remedies and law enforcement. These are all explored in the chapter, which also presents two concepts about the authority of the state in regulating behaviour in online communities. One of them, “sysop prerogative,” says that owners of website can do whatever they want so long as they have not had it taken away by law or given it away by contract. The second, ‘The Preece Gap’, says that there is a distance between the ideal usable and sociable website that the users want and that which the owners of the website provide in practice. Two other concepts are also introduced, “the Figallo effect” and the “Jimbo effect.” The former describes an online community where users use their actual identities and sysop prerogative is delegated to them. The latter describes those where sysop prerogative is exercised by one or more enforcers to control users who use pseudonyms. The chapter concludes that less anonymity and a more professionalised society are needed to bridge the gap between online and offline regulation of behavior.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.