Is there a dose-response relation of dietary glycemic load to risk of type 2 diabetes? Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies123

https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.041467Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although much is known about the association between dietary glycemic load (GL) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), prospective cohort studies have not consistently shown a positive dose-response relation.

Objective:

We performed a comprehensive examination of evidence on the dose response that links GL to T2D and sources of heterogeneity among all prospective cohort studies on healthy adults available in the literature.

Design:

We conducted a systematic review of all prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses to quantify the GL-T2D relation both without and with adjustment for covariates.

Results:

Among 24 prospective cohort studies identified by August 2012, the GL ranged from ∼60 to ∼280 g per daily intake of 2000 kcal (8.4 MJ). In a fully adjusted meta-analysis model, the GL was positively associated with RR of T2D of 1.45 (95% CI: 1.31, 1.61) for a 100-g increment in GL (P < 0.001; n = 24 studies; 7.5 million person-years of follow-up). Sex (P = 0.03), dietary instrument validity (P < 0.001), and ethnicity (European American compared with other; P = 0.04) together explained 97% of the heterogeneity among studies. After adjustment for heterogeneities, we used both funnel and trim-and-fill analyses to identify a negligible publication bias. Multiple influence, cumulative, and forecast analyses indicated that the GL-T2D relation tended to have reached stability and to have been underestimated. The relation was apparent at all doses of GL investigated, although it was statistically significant only at >95 g GL/2000 kcal.

Conclusion:

After we accounted for several sources of heterogeneity, findings from prospective cohort studies that related the GL to T2D appear robust and consistently indicate strong and significantly lower T2D risk in persons who consume lower-GL diets. This review was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO as CRD42011001810.

Cited by (0)

1

From Independent Nutrition Logic, Wymondham, Norfolk, United Kingdom (GL and HL); the Merton College, Oxford, United Kingdom (RT); and the Center for Metabolic Disease Prevention and Departments of Epidemiology, Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (SL).

2

Supported by Beneo-Palatinit GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.

3

Address correspondences to G Livesey, Independent Nutrition Logic Ltd, 21 Bellrope Lane, Wymondham, Norfolk NR18 0QX, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].

4

Abbreviations used: CORR, energy-adjusted and deattenuated dietary instrument correlation for carbohydrate; ETH, proportion of participants of European American ethnicity; FUY, number of follow-up years; GI, glycemic index; GL, glycemic load; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; Q1, Qmax, and Qn, the lowest, highest, and intermediate-and-highest numbered quantiles in a study; RDA, Recommended Dietary Allowance; SEX, proportion of male study participants; T2D, type 2 diabetes.