Korean J Intern Med > Volume 4(2); 1989 > Article
Lim, Jhoo, Lee, Lee, Chung, and Lee: The Clinical Usefulness of Serum Fructosamine and HbAlc in Patients with NIDDM

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical values of serum fructosamine and HbAlc, serum fructosamine and HbAlc were assessed in 50 normal controls and 36 patients with NIDDM (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus). And we studied 10 patients selected at random among the 36 patients with NIDDM.
The values of serum fructosamine and HbAlc in controls were 2.1 mmol/L and 5.3%, respectively. The levels of serum fructosamine and HbAlc were significantly higher in NIDDM patients (3.27 mmol/L and 8.8%, respectively, p<0.005) compared with those in the controls. The serum fructosamine was significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc (r=0.78, p<0.78, p<0.001; r=0.76, p<0.005, respectively). Also, in retrograde study, serum fructosamine concentration had a significant correlation to fasting plasma glucose determined 2 weeks before (r=0.72, p<0.002), and 4 weeks before (r=0.54, p<0.005).
It is concluded that serum fructosamine measurement may be useful in monitoring short-term control of plasma glucose in patients with NIDDM.

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is a universal health problem and may occur at any age.2) The traditional biochemical measurements for initially detecting patients with diabetes mellitus are random estimations of blood and urine glucose concentration. Despite their common use, both tests are nonspecific, being influenced by a wide variety of drugs and conditions.3,4,5)
Measurement of the glycosylated hemoglobin concentration in random blood specimens is a simpler screening test for diabetes6,7) and has the advantage that it reflects blood glucose control under physiologic conditions.8) And it is an accepted method for assessing long-term diabetic control.9,10)
Since the measurement of fructosamine as an index of diabetic control was first published by Johnson (1982),12) Baker et1) al.,10,13) Jerntorp et al.11) and other investigators14,15,17) have reported that fructosamine concentrations were correlated with HbAlc and other measures of glycemia, and fructosamine appeared more useful than HbAlc for monitoring short-term changes of glycemia.
The present study was undertaken to determine the clinical usefulness of fructosamine estimations in monitoring short-term glycemic control during the management of patients with NIDDM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum fructosamine, fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc were measured in 50 normal controls and 36 patients with NIDDM. We studied four men and six women selected at random among the 36 patients with NIDDM, aged 21–73 years (median 47), who had been admitted to our hospital from Nov. 1988 to March 1989.
Table 1 summarizes the clinical details of patients. All patients had normal liver and renal function and normal hematologic profiles. Three patients have been associated with peripheral neuropathy and four patients had retinopathy (Table 1).
References for serum fructosamine, fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc values were determined in 50 non-diabetic volunteers aged 20–65 years (median 43). Diabetes was excluded from this reference population using the fasting plasma glucose, postprandial 2 hour glucose and urinary glucose results. The patients studied were on a diet regimen and had taken oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin injection. In these patients, fasting plasma glucose, serum fructosamine and HbAlc were measured on admission and at biweekly intervals to 8 weeks.
Fructosamine was measured using an ABBOTT VP automated analyzer by colourimetric test based on the ability of ketoamines to reduce nitroblue tetrazolium in alkaline medium (Fructosamine test, Roche). HbAlc was measured by a mini-column method using a Perkin-Elmer Junior model 35 spectrophotometer.

RESULTS

The range of values for serum fructosamine in controls was 1.7–2.6 mmol/L (mean 2.1 mmol/L). Fasting plasma glucose concentrations in the same subjects were 70–109 mg/dl (mean 90 mg/dl) and HbAlc values were 4.4–6.4% (mean 5.3%), which are compatible with normal ranges of other laboratory criteria. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations in patients with NIDDM were 174–374 mg/dl (mean 235 mg/dl). The levels of serum fructosamine and HbAlc were significantly higher in NIDDM patients (2.4–4.5 mmol/L: mean 3.27 mmol/L, 7.2–12.5%: mean 8.8%, respectively, p<0.005) compared with those in the normal controls (Table 2).
The correlation of serum fructosamine to fasting plasma glucose and to HbAlc was examined in normal controls and diabetic patients. The serum fructosamine was significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc. Correlation coefficients were 0.78 and 0.76 respectively and p values indicate statistical significance (p<0.001, p<0.005 respectively) (Table 3, Fig. 1).
Also, in ten patients studied, retrograde assessment for the correlation of serum fructosamine to fasting plasma glucose was periodically performed after management of diabetes for 8 weeks. The serum fructosamine concentration had a significant correlation to the fasting plasma glucose level determined 2 weeks before (r = 0.72, p<0.002) and 4 weeks before (r = 0.54, p<0.005), but there were no significant correlations to the fasting plasma glucose levels 6 weeks before (r = 0.16, NS) and 8 weeks before (r = 0.18, NS) (Table 4).
We studied the changes and regression rates of fasting plasma glucose, serum fructosamine and HbAlc during the management of diabetes for 8 weeks. Hyperglycemia was well controlled with symptomatic improvement, without newly developed complications including hypoglycemia. Fig. II indicates that the change of serum fructosamine shows a sharper downward slope than that of HbAlc until 6 weeks (Fig. 2).
The regression rates of serum fructosamine increased more than those of HbAlc at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks (17.5%, 22% and 21%; 10%, 9.8% and 16%, respectively). That is to say, until 6 weeks, serum fructosamine decreased more sensitively than HbAlc. Conversely, at 8 weeks, HbAlc decreased more sensitively than serum fructosamine (Table 5, Fig. 3).

DISCUSSION

While the value of plasma glucose measurement at standard times throughout the day is established as a guide to modifying treatment, an accurate measure of mean blood glucose concentrations over several days or weeks would prove extremely useful in judging overall diabetic control and the response to changes in management.18) Fructosamine provides such a measurement, reflecting mainly the basal or fasting plasma glucose concentration with little contribution from transient postprandial hyperglycemia.1)
Measurement of the glycosylated hemoglobin concentration is an accepted method for assessing long-term diabetic control,19,20) Many studies reported that fructosamine, as an index of short-term diabetic control, correlated with HbAlc and other measures of glycemia and appeared more useful than HbAlc for monitoring short-term changes.1,1015,17) Other previous reports showed that the fasting plasma glucose concentration varies in response to stress or exercise, urinary glucose is modified by the renal threshold, the HbAlc value depends on red cell turnover and fructosamine is influenced by alterations in serum protein metabolism.1,10)
In this study, all patients had normal liver and renal function and normal hematologic profiles.
In controls, serum fructosamine and HbAlc levels were compatible with normal ranges of other laboratory criteria. Serum fructosamine and HbAlc levels were significantly higher in NIDDM patients compared with those in normal controls and serum fructosamine was significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc.
Also, in retrograde study, serum fructosamine concentration had a significant correlation to fasting plasma glucose determined 2 weeks before and 4 weeks before. In patients, hyperglycemia was well controlled with improved symptoms, without newly developed complications including hypoglycemia. During the management of diabetes for 8 weeks, serum fructosamine decreased more sensitively than HbAlc until 6 weeks. Conversely, at 8 weeks, HbAlc decreased more sensitively than serum fructosamine.
With these results, we believe that serum fructosamine and HbAlc measurement may be helpful in screening for diabetes mellitus, and serum fructosamine measurement may be useful in monitoring short-term control of plasma glucose in patients with NIDDM.
Further more, as an ongoing study, we will continue to monitor the serum fructosamine and HbAlc levels in patients with NIDDM.

Fig. 1.
Correlation of serum fructosamine to fasting plasma glucose and HbAlc (r: correlation coefficient)
kjim-4-2-155-9f1.gif
Fig. 2.
The changes of fasting plasma glucose, serum fructosamine and HbAlc during the management of DM for 8 weeks.
kjim-4-2-155-9f2.gif
Fig 3.
Regression rates of serum fructosamine and HbAlc
kjim-4-2-155-9f3.gif
Table 1.
Clinical Details of Patients (M:4, F:6)
Case Sex/Age(year) Duration of DM Complication
1 M/37 5 years peripheral neuropathy
2 F/60 2 years proliferative retinopathy
3 M/56 8 years peripheral neuorpathy
4 F/53 3 months
5 F66 8 years cataract background retinopathy
6 M/40 2 years
7 F/53 10 years peripheral neuropathy
8 M/73 10 years cataract background retinopathy
9 F/54 10 months
10 F/58 5 years proliferative retinopathy
Table 2.
Serum Fructosamine & HbAlc Values in Normal Controls and NIDDM Patients
Fructosamine (mean, distribution) HbAlc
controls (n = 50) 2.1 (1.7–2.6)mmol/L 5.3 (4.4–6.4) %
NIDDM (n = 36) 3.27 (2.4–4.5)mmol/L 8.8 (7.2–12.5) %

Statistically significant, p<0.005

Table 3.
Correlation of Serum Fructosamine to fasting Plasma Glucose and to HbAlc
Fructosamine
Fasting plasma glucose r = 0.78 p<0.001
HbAlc r = 0.76 p<0.005
Table 4.
Retrograde Study for Correlation of Serum Fructosamine to fasting Plasma Glucose After Management of DM for 8 Weeks
Fructosamins
*FBS 2 weeks before r = 0.72 p<0.002
   4 weeks before r = 0.54 p<0.005
   6 weeks before r = 0.16 **NS
   8 weeks before r = 0.18 **NS

* FBS: Fasting Blood Sugar

** NS: Not Significant

Table 5.
Regression Rates of Serum Fructosamine and HbAlc
Regression rates (average %)
2 weeks 4 weeks 6 weeks 8 weeks
Fructosamine 17.5% 22% 21% 23.5%
HbAlc 10% 9.75% 16% 40%

REFERENCES

1. Baker JR, O’Conner JP, Metcalf PA, Lawson MR. Clinical usefulness of estimation of serum fructosamine concentration as a screening test for diabetes mellitus. Br Med J 287 24:863. 1983.
crossref pmid pmc
2. WHO Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus. Second report. WHO Tech Rep Ser 646:1. 1980.

3. Young DS, Pestaner LC, Gribberman V. Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests. Clin Chem 21:304. 1975.
crossref
4. Siperstein MD. The glucose tolerance test; a pitfall in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Adv Intern Med 20:297. 1975.
pmid
5. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 28:1039. 1979.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Santiago JV, Davis JE, Fisner F. Hemoglobin Alc levels in a diabetes detection program. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 47:578. 1978.
crossref pmid
7. Dunn PJ, Cole RA, Soeldner JS, Glesson RE. Reproducibility of hemoglobin Alc and sensitivity to various degrees of glucose intolerance. Ann Intern Med 91:390. 1979.
crossref pmid
8. Bunn HF. Nonenzymatic glycosylation of protein; relevance to diabetes. Am J Med 70:325. 1981.
crossref
9. John RB, Roger NJ, David JS. Serum fructosamine concentrations in patients with type II diabetes mellitus during changes in management. Anonymous. Haemoglobin Al and diabetes: a reappraisal. (Editorial). Br Med J 281:1304. 1980.
crossref pmid pmc
10. John RB, Roger NJ, David JS. Serum fructosamine concentrations in patients with type II diabetes mellitus during changes in management. Br Med J 288 19:1484. 1984.

11. Jerntrop P, Sundkvist G, Fex G, Jeppson JO. Clinical utility of serum fructosamine in diabetes mellitus compared with hemoglobin Alc. Clin Chem Acta 175:135. 1988.
crossref
12. Johnson RN, Metcalf PA, Baker JR. Fructosamine; a new approach to the estimation of serum glycosylated protein, an index of diabetic control. Clin Chem Acta 127:87. 1982.
crossref
13. Baker JR. Serum fructosamine concentration as measure of blood glucose control in type I diabetes mellitus. Br Med J 290:352. 1985.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Negoro H, Morley JE, Rosenthal MJ. Utility of serum fructosamine as a measure of glycemia in young and old diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Am J Med 85:360. 1988.
crossref pmid
15. Frandson EK, Sabagh T, Baccus RA. Serum fructosamine in diabetic pregnancy. Clin Chem 34(2):316. 1988.
crossref pmid
16. Johnson RN, Metcalf PA, Baker JR. Relationship between albumin and fructosamine concentration in diabetic and nondiabetic sera. Clin Chem Acta 164:151. 1987.
crossref
17. Shoji T, Tabata T, Nishizawa Y, Kimunami K, Matsushita Y, Inoue T, Miki T, Kenmotsu M, Morii H. Clinical availability of serum fructosamine measurement in diabetic patients with uremia. Nephron 51:338. 1989.
crossref pmid
18. Tattersall R, Walford S, Peacock I, Gale E, Allison S. A critical evaluation of methods of monitoring diabetic control. Diabetic Care 3:150. 1980.
crossref
19. Graf RJ, Halter JB, Potte D. Glycosylated hemoglobin in normal subjects and subjects with maturity-onset diabetes. Evidence for a saturable system in man. Diabetes 27:834. 1980.
crossref
20. Boden G, Master RW, Gordon SS, Shuman CR, Owen OE. Monitoring metabolic control in diabetic outpatients with glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Intern Med 92:357. 1980.
crossref pmid

Editorial Office
101-2501, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2271-6792    Fax: +82-2-790-0993    E-mail: kaim@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Internal Medicine.

Close layer
prev next