Evaluation of different markers in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic value of clinical staging, tumour cell detection and tumour marker analysis for tumour progression and overall survival

  • Authors:
    • Sabine Kasimir-Bauer
    • Norbert Schleucher
    • Rainer Weber
    • Rainer Neumann
    • Siegfried Seeber
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 1, 2003     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.10.2.475
  • Pages: 475-482
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

We compared the prognostic value of routine pathology, cytokeratin-positive (CK+) cells in the bone marrow (BM) and serum tumour markers (TM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of diagnosis with regard to overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Eighty patients with NSCLC, staged as T2-4, N0-3, M0 (n=52), M1 (n=27), (Mx = 1) were evaluated. Treatment included chemo-radiotherapy with cisplatin/etoposide and subsequent radical surgical resection. There were 23 complete responders, 50 non-responders and 7 patients who died of non-lung cancer causes. The median follow-up was 12 months (range 1-44 months). Besides routine pathology for tissue and BM, CK+ BM cells were detected by immunocytochemistry (IC) and 4 different tumour markers as well as the shedded domain of the oncoprotein Her-2/neu and urokinase plasminogen activator uPA were determined by radio- or enzyme-immunoassay. Patients classified as stage IV and patients with metastases had a significantly lower TTP and OS. No significant correlation was demonstrated for grading, tumour size or number of involved lymph nodes. The tumour marker tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and Cyfra 21-1 were the only marker which significantly correlated with OS. Interestingly, routine pathology could not detect minimal residual BM involvement as IC was able to (p=0.0004) and the presence of even a few CK+ cells significantly correlated with reduced OS. Thus, we conclude that the detection of CK+ cells should be added to routine pathology and for tumour marker determination, studies should focus on Cyfra 21-1 and TPA.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-April 2003
Volume 10 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kasimir-Bauer S, Schleucher N, Weber R, Neumann R and Seeber S: Evaluation of different markers in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic value of clinical staging, tumour cell detection and tumour marker analysis for tumour progression and overall survival. Oncol Rep 10: 475-482, 2003
APA
Kasimir-Bauer, S., Schleucher, N., Weber, R., Neumann, R., & Seeber, S. (2003). Evaluation of different markers in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic value of clinical staging, tumour cell detection and tumour marker analysis for tumour progression and overall survival. Oncology Reports, 10, 475-482. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.10.2.475
MLA
Kasimir-Bauer, S., Schleucher, N., Weber, R., Neumann, R., Seeber, S."Evaluation of different markers in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic value of clinical staging, tumour cell detection and tumour marker analysis for tumour progression and overall survival". Oncology Reports 10.2 (2003): 475-482.
Chicago
Kasimir-Bauer, S., Schleucher, N., Weber, R., Neumann, R., Seeber, S."Evaluation of different markers in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic value of clinical staging, tumour cell detection and tumour marker analysis for tumour progression and overall survival". Oncology Reports 10, no. 2 (2003): 475-482. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.10.2.475