The following article is Open access

Statistical Analysis of Circular-ribbon Flares

, , , , , , and

Published 2022 May 13 © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
, , Citation Yanjie Zhang et al 2022 ApJS 260 19 DOI 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5f4c

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0067-0049/260/1/19

Abstract

Circular-ribbon flares (CFs) are a special type of solar flares owing to their particular magnetic topology. In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive statistical analysis of 134 CFs from 2011 September to 2017 June, including 4 B-class, 82 C-class, 40 M-class, and 8 X-class flares. The flares were observed by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory spacecraft. The physical properties of CFs are derived, including the location, area (ACF), equivalent radius (rCF) assuming a semispherical fan dome, lifetime (τCF), and peak soft X-ray (SXR) flux in 1–8 Å. It is found that all CFs are located in active regions, with the latitudes between −30° and 30°. The distributions of areas and lifetimes could be fitted with a lognormal function. There is a positive correlation between the lifetime and area. The peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å is well in accord with a power-law distribution with an index of −1.42. For the 134 CFs, 57% of them are accompanied by remote brightenings or ribbons. A positive correlation exists between the total length (LRB) and average distance (DRB) of remote brightenings. About 47% and 51% of the 134 CFs are related to type III radio bursts and jets, respectively. The association rates are independent of flare energies. About 38% of CFs are related to minifilament eruptions, and the association rates increase with flare classes. Only 28% of CFs are related to coronal mass ejections (CMEs), meaning that a majority of them are confined rather than eruptive events. There is a positive correlation between the CME speed and peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å, and faster CMEs tend to be wider.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Introduction

Since their first discovery in 1859 (Carrington 1859), solar flares have been observed and studied extensively (see Fletcher et al. 2011; Shibata & Magara 2011, and references therein). According to the classical two-dimensional (2D) flare model, i.e., the CSHKP model (Carmichael 1964; Sturrock 1966; Hirayama 1974; Kopp & Pneuman 1976), when high-energy electrons accelerated by magnetic reconnection propagate downward along the reconnected flare loops and hit the chromosphere, the localized plasmas at the footpoints are impulsively heated, forming two bright and elongated ribbons observed in ultraviolet (UV), extreme-ultraviolet (EUV), and wavelengths (Ji et al. 2006; Jing et al. 2016). In most cases, the ribbons separate due to continuing reconnection (Qiu et al. 2002). Aulanier et al. (2012) and Janvier et al. (2013) extended the 2D standard model to three dimensions to interpret the flare ribbons taking on double-J shapes.

Apart from the typical two-ribbon flares, there is another class of flares, i.e., circular-ribbon flares (CFs), whose ribbons are elliptical or circular (Masson et al. 2009). It is generally believed that the three-dimensional (3D) magnetic configuration of CFs is composed of a null point and the associated dome-shaped fan-spine structure in the corona (e.g., Reid et al. 2012; Wang & Liu 2012; Jiang et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2013; Vemareddy & Wiegelmann 2014; Joshi et al. 2015, 2021; Liu et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015, 2021; Mitra & Joshi 2021). Sometimes, the outer spine is embedded in a thin quasi-separatrix layer (Demoulin et al. 1996) where magnetic connectivity changes rapidly (Masson et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018). Magnetic reconnection preferentially occurs near the null point (Pontin et al. 2007; Priest & Pontin 2009; Pontin et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2020), and the closed ribbon is related to the intersection between the chromosphere and fan surface. Meanwhile, a shorter ribbon inside the closed ribbon is believed to be the intersection between the chromosphere and inner spine. The sizes of circular ribbons range from ∼30'' (Wang & Liu 2012; Hao et al. 2017) to several 100'' (Liu et al. 2013; Joshi et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2019; Hou et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2020). The brightening of circular flare ribbons is not always simultaneous, but sequential in some cases, which is probably caused by slip-running reconnection (Aulanier et al. 2007). The direction of brightening could be clockwise (Shen et al. 2019) or counterclockwise (Masson et al. 2009; Li et al. 2017, 2018; Xu et al. 2017). Interestingly, Zhang et al. (2020) reported fast degradation of a circular ribbon at speeds of 30–70 km s−1 on 2014 August 24. Remote brightenings are frequently observed adjacent to the main flare site as a result of energy transport along the outer spine (Masson et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2015; Hernandez-Perez et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017; Masson et al. 2017; Devi et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2021). Extended remote brightenings with a length of ∼400'' are investigated by Liu et al. (2020).

CFs are usually triggered by filament eruptions (Joshi et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2017; Song et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2020), which may also generate coronal jets (Wang & Liu 2012; Zhang et al. 2016a, 2021; Joshi et al. 2018; Li & Yang 2019; Zhang & Ni 2019; Zhang 2020; Dai et al. 2021) or drive coronal mass ejections (CMEs; Sun et al. 2013; Joshi et al. 2015, 2017; Liu et al. 2019, 2020). CFs show similar dynamics to those of two-ribbon flares. Explosive chromospheric evaporation was detected in a C4.2-class flare by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (De Pontieu et al. 2014) on 2015 October 16 (Zhang et al. 2016a). The estimated energy flux of nonthermal electrons is adequate to account for the explosive evaporation. Imaging observation of converging hot ($\mathrm{log}T\approx 7.0$) plasma in a postflare loop is considered as direct evidence of chromospheric evaporation during the impulsive phase of a flare (Zhang et al. 2019a). Redshifts of a few 10 km s−1 in the low-temperature emission lines (e.g., Si iv) are clear indications of chromospheric condensation at the circular flare ribbons (Zhang et al. 2016b, 2021). Besides, quasiperiodic pulsations (QPPs; Zimovets et al. 2021) produced by intermittent magnetic reconnections are identified in CFs (Kumar et al. 2015, 2016; Zhang et al. 2016b; Chen et al. 2019; Kashapova et al. 2020; Lee et al. 2020; Li et al. 2020; Ning et al. 2022). The periods are between 20 s and 4 minutes in most cases. CFs are also accompanied by type III radio bursts (Zhang et al. 2016b, 2021) or type IV radio continuum emission (Chen et al. 2019). The total energies of CFs can reach up to 1031–1033 erg. Zhang et al. (2019b) calculated various energy components in two successive M1.8-class CFs in NOAA active region (AR) 12434, including the peak thermal energy, nonthermal energy in flare-accelerated electrons, total radiative loss of the hot plasma, and radiative energy in 1–8 Å and 1–70 Å. It is revealed that the energy partitions in two flares are similar, and the heating requirement consisting of the peak thermal energy and radiative loss could sufficiently be supplied by the nonthermal energy. Furthermore, Cai et al. (2021) investigated four confined CFs in detail, finding that the values of energy components increase systematically with flare classes. The ratio of nonthermal energy to magnetic free energy may provide a key factor for discriminating confined flares from eruptive ones.

So far, CFs have become a topic of great interest due to their particular configurations. However, statistical investigation of CFs is rare compared to two-ribbon flares (e.g., Crosby et al. 1993; Temmer et al. 2001; Veronig et al. 2002; Yashiro et al. 2006; Li et al. 2021; Lu et al. 2021) or microflares (Christe et al. 2008; Hannah et al. 2008). Song & Tian (2018) performed a statistical investigation of 90 CFs observed from 2010 June to 2017 December, finding that the occurrence rate of white-light (WL) flares increases with flare class. Moreover, the flares with WL enhancement have shorter durations, smaller sizes, stronger electric current, and more complicated magnetic fields. Nevertheless, a comprehensive study of the physical properties of CFs and related phenomena is scarce. In this paper, we carry out a statistical analysis of 134 CFs, including 4 B-class, 82 C-class, 40 M-class, and 8 X-class CFs (see Table 1). The paper is organized as follows. We describe the data analysis in Section 2. Statistical properties are presented in Section 3. Finally, a brief conclusion and discussion are given in Section 4.

Table 1. List of 134 Circular-ribbon Flares

No.NOAADateGOESPeak FluxLocation τCF ACF LRB/DRB JetType IIIFE VCME WCME
 AR Class(W m−2) (min)(Mm2)(Mm/Mm)   (km s−1)(deg)
1112832011 Sep 6M5.35.39E-05N15W09942823.528.0/117.6NoNoNo782360
2112832011 Sep 6X2.12.16E-04N15W20352594.865.8/105.6NoNoYes575360
3112832011 Sep 7X1.81.80E-04N16W32811983.0193.4/76.3NoNoYes792167
4112832011 Sep 8M6.76.77E-05N16W42642439.6103.0/77.9NoNoYes983281
5113242011 Oct 22C4.14.12E-06N11E24341616.919.3/63.7NoNoNo
6113392011 Nov 3X1.92.04E-04N21E64102725.865.2/35.7NoNoYes991360
7113392011 Nov 6M1.41.45E-05N21E3294581.714.1/70.7NoYesNo
8113392011 Nov 6C8.89.10E-06N21E3043542.635.7/67.5NoNoNo
9113392011 Nov 6C5.35.42E-06N21E28113422.833.2/72.2NoNoNo
10113462011 Nov 15M1.91.97E-05S19E32991165.3144.8/86.1YesYesNo16380
11113462011 Nov 16C2.82.91E-06S18E1931315.891.3/75.2YesNoYes
12113462011 Nov 16C2.93.01E-06S18E1637345.159.8/72.7YesNoYes
13113462011 Nov 16C5.05.14E-06S19E12591181.3121.8/118.3YesNoYes
14113462011 Nov 17C2.02.05E-06S19E04591278.9134.1/86.7NoNoNo
15114762012 May 6C1.41.43E-06N11E7212354.0NoNoNo
16114762012 May 7C4.04.17E-06N11E6173598.939.6/54.9YesYesNo
17114762012 May 7C7.98.07E-06N13E6024428.078.3/67.7NoYesNo
18114762012 May 7C7.47.67E-06N13E5659445.1NoYesNo
19114762012 May 8M1.41.48E-05N13E4592545.660.1/92.3NoYesYes
20114762012 May 9M4.74.86E-05N13E3261569.479.2/91.7YesNoYes
21114762012 May 9C1.51.55E-06N13E2811424.1YesNoNo
22114762012 May 9M4.14.16E-05N13E2766797.7128.2/97.4YesNoYes
23114762012 May 10M5.76.00E-05N13E231011188.3119.5/86.2YesYesYes
24114762012 May 10M1.71.84E-05N13E1483979.882.5/98.5YesNoYes
25114762012 May 11C3.13.15E-06N14E1320816.2YesYesNo
26114762012 May 11C3.53.69E-06N14E0611485.9YesYesNo
27114762012 May 14C2.53.02E-06N08W4636339.827.4/41.3YesYesNo55148
28115982012 Oct 22M5.05.10E-05S13E641131343.4NoNoNo
29115982012 Oct 23X1.81.71E-04S13E591081423.2NoNoNo
30116522013 Jan 8C1.81.92E-06N21E5625343.5YesNoNo
31116522013 Jan 12C3.13.29E-06N19W174182.1NoNoNo
32116522013 Jan 13M1.01.25E-05N18W1816311.1YesYesNo
33116522013 Jan 13C2.72.83E-06N18W2220213.6NoYesNo
34116522013 Jan 13M1.71.86E-05N18W229362.156.2/115.2YesYesYes69646
35116522013 Jan 14C6.56.75E-06N18W3114438.424.2/66.6NoNoNo
36116692013 Feb 5B6.66.92E-07N09E64631191.6YesNoYes
37116692013 Feb 5C6.36.51E-06N08E62251649.0YesYesYes44466
38116752013 Feb 17M1.92.80E-05N12E2110183.07.0/47.7YesYesNo
39116892013 Mar 12C3.63.87E-06S20W4028154.221.3/82.8YesNoYes
40117312013 Apr 28C3.74.07E-06N09E289335.2YesYesNo
41117312013 Apr 28C1.81.96E-06N09E288433.3YesNoYes
42117312013 Apr 28C3.64.02E-06N09E2713133.2YesYesNo
43117312013 Apr 29C3.03.06E-06N10E1414634.7NoYesNo45267
44117312013 May 1C1.11.14E-06N07W1110160.8YesNoYes
45117312013 May 2M1.11.13E-05N11W25434539.9YesYesYes
46118902013 Nov 5M2.52.81E-05S16E5112752.7135.3/72.1NoYesYes
47118902013 Nov 5X3.33.85E-04S13E4523796.461.8/79.4YesYesYes562195
48118902013 Nov 6C8.68.93E-06S13E3917726.7YesYesYes
49118902013 Nov 6M3.83.88E-05S13E3621701.0169.8/149.8NoYesYes347122
50118902013 Nov 7M2.32.41E-05S13E2822727.8YesNoYes
51118902013 Nov 7C5.95.99E-06S13E2321697.8NoYesYes
52118902013 Nov 8X1.11.22E-04S14E15241485.7311.1/120.9YesYesYes
53118902013 Nov 10X1.11.14E-04S15W13332171.1381.0/119.1YesYesYes682262
54118902013 Nov 10C3.13.17E-06S15W1956306.5YesYesNo
55118902013 Nov 11C6.46.59E-06S15W2633521.039.6/110.1NoNoYes
56118902013 Nov 11C7.88.18E-06S14W2412642.712.5/128.0YesNoNo53340
57118902013 Nov 11C5.05.09E-06S14W34251020.616.7/105.6YesNoNo
58118902013 Nov 12C3.13.22E-06S11W6012346.8YesNoNo36524
59118902013 Nov 13C6.56.75E-06S14W54144877.350.2/84.0YesYesNo
60119362013 Dec 25C1.71.79E-06S18E5158621.2NoNoNo25472
61119362013 Dec 27C4.44.52E-06S17E2335507.7YesYesNo30567
62119362013 Dec 28C3.03.08E-06S17E0938931.132.3/49.2NoYesYes
63119362013 Dec 28C9.39.44E-06S17E06100684.124.5/45.0NoNoNo
64119362013 Dec 29C3.13.17E-06S17W019451.6NoYesNo
65119362013 Dec 29M3.13.23E-05S17W0265828.110.4/48.6YesYesYes
66119362013 Dec 29C5.15.26E-06S16W0660831.77.7/48.9NoNoNo
67119362013 Dec 29C1.92.02E-06S16W0720364.2NoNoNo
68119362013 Dec 29C5.45.57E-06S16W0961647.6218.6/103.0YesNoNo
69119362013 Dec 31M6.46.49E-05S17W361282582.3240.5/88.9NoYesYes
70119362014 Jan 1M9.91.00E-04S16W47554240.8116.8/84.2NoNoYes326113
71119912014 Feb 27C6.87.03E-06S22E5821461.934.3/67.5YesYesNo12055
72119912014 Feb 28M1.11.22E-05S23E5261333.6123.5/59.6YesNoNo
73119912014 Mar 5C4.85.04E-06S27W0724248.4YesNoYes
74119912014 Mar 5C2.82.90E-06S27W0879248.9YesNoNo
75119912014 Mar 5M1.01.06E-05S27W087318.727.8/89.8YesNoNo
76120172014 Mar 28M2.02.06E-05N12W21422256.6YesYesYes26031
77120172014 Mar 28M2.62.67E-05N12W24372150.1YesYesYes514138
78120172014 Mar 29X1.01.02E-04N11W33642030.628.8/65.7YesNoYes528360
79120312014 Apr 6C3.83.96E-06N03W23661476.1NoNoYes
80120352014 Apr 15C8.69.08E-06S15E25211030.012.5/93.6YesYesYes27427
81120352014 Apr 15C7.37.92E-06S14E21472640.7NoYesYes360179
82120352014 Apr 16M1.01.04E-05S13E08331920.4150.4/148.0YesYesYes76461
83120362014 Apr 18M7.37.32E-05S17W2913823961.9NoYesNo1203360
84120872014 Jun 13M2.62.66E-05S20E40711004.133.0/91.5YesYesNo37042
85120872014 Jun 13C9.09.17E-06S19E3226909.316.0/79.3NoYesNo60531
86121272014 Jul 31C1.31.44E-06S07E328193.0YesYesYes45877
87121462014 Aug 22C2.22.22E-06N11E01883099.4NoYesNo
88121482014 Aug 22C6.66.71E-06N08W3227394.47.2/87.4YesNoNo
89121572014 Sep 13C3.73.92E-06S16W3934315.317.5/35.3NoYesNo
90121922014 Oct 20M1.41.57E-05S15E4621508.6YesYesNo
91122012014 Nov 3C4.24.32E-06S03E2126987.7YesYesYes
92122272014 Dec 13C4.04.10E-06S03W66361040.3YesYesYes19874
93122422014 Dec 17M8.78.76E-05S22E0916213165.7358.8/186.2NoNoNo587360
94122662015 Jan 19C3.33.41E-06S06E0423415.0YesNoYes
95122682015 Jan 29C8.28.32E-06S12W031192071.226.9/129.6NoNoNo
96122682015 Jan 29M2.12.12E-05S11W07993042.030.9/116.0NoYesNo
97122682015 Jan 29C6.46.43E-06S11W111913235.131.2/112.5NoNoNo
98122682015 Jan 30M2.02.09E-05S12W152054132.437.3/104.7NoNoNo
99122682015 Jan 30M1.71.77E-05S11W171164783.787.8/87.2NoNoNo
100122762015 Jan 30C3.83.84E-06S07E0988957.5YesYesYes
101122772015 Feb 3C3.93.98E-06N07W0443599.014.2/77.4YesYesYes
102122972015 Mar 9C9.19.40E-06S15E4433771.934.5/52.8YesYesYes583155
103122972015 Mar 10M5.15.29E-05S14E39251182.6YesYesNo1040360
104122972015 Mar 10C1.34.67E-06S16E4138574.7YesYesNo
105122972015 Mar 11M2.92.97E-05S15E2785591.8NoYesNo702160
106122972015 Mar 12M2.72.81E-05S14E0294828.0NoYesNo
107122972015 Mar 13M1.81.89E-05S14W0380710.5YesYesNo
108122972015 Mar 15C2.42.51E-06S17W2816554.1YesNoYes
109122972015 Mar 15C1.01.04E-06S17W4021346.6YesNoNo
110123252015 Apr 16C3.33.37E-06N06E511121177.412.8/47.5NoNoNo
111124342015 Oct 15C3.63.77E-06S11E5532417.2NoNoNo
112124342015 Oct 15C3.94.07E-06S11E5334627.7NoNoNo
113124342015 Oct 15C3.43.51E-06S11E5249535.3NoNoNo
114124342015 Oct 15C3.13.22E-06S12E5147440.829.5/92.2NoNoNo28313
115124342015 Oct 15M1.11.21E-05S13E5013561.7375.9/178.2NoNoNo
116124342015 Oct 16C3.43.58E-06S13E4516569.595.7/167.6YesYesNo
117124342015 Oct 16C3.13.22E-06S13E4423563.5281.9/177.0NoYesNo
118124342015 Oct 16M1.11.14E-05S13E4626599.0282.8/177.8NoYesYes
119124342015 Oct 16C4.24.34E-06S13E4214608.8262.2/170.7YesYesYes18983
120124342015 Oct 24C1.31.35E-06S13W7329720.4YesNoNo
121124972016 Feb 13C1.31.37E-06N14W2513241.529.2/89.2NoNoNo
122124972016 Feb 13C2.82.85E-06N14W2627281.525.1/83.1YesNoNo27819
123124972016 Feb 13B8.58.68E-07N14W2626130.3NoNoNo
124124972016 Feb 13B6.97.03E-07N14W2751123.1NoNoNo
125124972016 Feb 13M1.81.88E-05N14W29120361.159.2/72.8YesNoNo
126124972016 Feb 13C1.61.67E-06N14W3126400.849.0/66.4NoNoNo
127124972016 Feb 14C3.43.48E-06N14W3670464.851.7/50.7NoNoNo
128124972016 Feb 14M1.01.05E-05N14W4839987.252.7/85.5NoNoNo
129124972016 Feb 15C3.93.94E-06N14W5331899.126.2/28.6YesNoNo
130125672016 Jul 16C6.87.11E-06N05E2635260.619.4/31.4NoNoNo
131126152016 Nov 30C2.33.90E-06S07E4324127.3NoNoNo
132126612017 Jun 3C2.12.16E-06N07E5677636.9NoYesYes
133126612017 Jun 3C2.52.67E-06N06E5346921.5NoYesNo
134126612017 Jun 5B5.85.90E-07N06E1845155.56.2/60.5NoNoNo

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3

Table 2. Minima, Maxima, Mean Values, and Median Values of the Physical Properties of CFs and the Related Activities

Parameter ACF rCF τCF LRB DRB VCME WCME
 (Mm2)(Mm)(minute)(Mm)(Mm)(km s−1)(deg)
Minimum123.16.34.06.228.6120.013.0
Maximum23,961.987.3205.0381.0186.21203.0360.0
Mean1214.816.849.684.189.1516.7143.6
Median631.214.235.044.384.8514.080.0

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

2. Data Analysis

We searched for CFs observed by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA; Lemen et al. 2012) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO; Pesnell et al. 2012) from 2011 September to 2017 June. AIA took full-disk images in seven EUV (94, 131, 171, 193, 211, 304, and 335 Å) and two UV (1600 and 1700 Å) wavelengths. The AIA Level 1 data with a time cadence of 12 s and a spatial resolution of 1farcs2 were calibrated using the standard program aia_prep.pro in the Solar Software. Photospheric line-of-sight (LOS) magnetograms of the flares were observed by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI; Scherrer et al. 2012) on board SDO. The HMI Level 1 data with a time cadence of 45 s and a spatial resolution of 1farcs2 were calibrated using the standard program hmi_prep.pro. Soft X-ray (SXR) light curves of CFs in 1–8 Å were recorded by the GOES spacecraft. The associations with remote brightenings, coronal jets, and minifilament eruptions were checked using the EUV observations of AIA. The total lengths of remote brightenings and average distances from the flare centers were calculated. The association with CMEs was examined using the WL observations from the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO; Brueckner et al. 1995) on board the SOHO spacecraft. The LASCO/C2 has a field of view (FOV) of 2–6 R. Two databases were used: the CDAW catalog 4 where CMEs are identified manually and the CACTus website 5 where CMEs are recognized automatically (Yashiro et al. 2008). The apparent linear velocities and angular widths of the associated CMEs were analyzed. The relation with type III radio bursts was checked using the radio dynamic spectra recorded by the e-Callisto 6 ground-based stations as well as the WAVES (Bougeret et al. 1995) instrument (0.02–13.825 MHz) on board the WIND spacecraft. 7

3. Statistical Properties

3.1. Location

In Figure 1, the top panels show three images of the C4.2-class flare observed by AIA in 304 Å on 2015 October 16 (Zhang et al. 2016a; Dai et al. 2021). The flare was triggered by a minifilament eruption and was associated with a blowout coronal jet. In panel (a3), the flare ribbon is fitted with an ellipse, whose center is considered as the flare location (S13E42). The middle panels of Figure 1 show 304 Å images of another three cases. The bright ribbons are fitted with a circle and two ellipses, which are drawn with dashed cyan lines. The centers (S22E09, S19E32, and S13E59) of the flares are derived and pointed to by solid arrows. The bottom panels of Figure 1 show the corresponding LOS magnetograms of the three events observed by HMI. The CFs are characterized by a central positive (negative) polarity surrounded by negative (positive) polarities, which is essentially consistent with the fan-spine magnetic structure (Masson et al. 2009; Wang & Liu 2012). Most of the CFs in our sample show similar characteristics. For all 134 events, we fit the circular or quasi-circular ribbons observed in 304 or 1600 Å with a circle or an ellipse. The derived coordinates of CFs in the sixth column of Table 1 agree with those recorded in the GOES flare catalog. 8 In Figure 2(a), the flare centers are marked with colored dots, with cyan (red) dots signifying confined (eruptive) flares. Figure 2(b) shows latitude distribution of the CFs, where 76 (58) of which are located in the southern (northern) hemisphere. It is clear that all CFs are located in ARs like microflares, and the latitudes of CFs are between −30° and 30°. Hence, the distribution of CFs is consistent with the AR belts.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Top panels: three snapshots of the AIA 304 Å images, showing the evolution of the C4.2-class flare in AR 12434 on 2015 October 16. The white arrows point to the accompanying minifilament eruption and coronal jet. In panel (a3), the location and total area of the flare are labeled. The remote brightening is outlined by the cyan line. The total length and average distance between the flare and remote brightening are labeled. Middle panels: additional three cases observed in 304 Å. The flare ribbons are fitted with a circle and two ellipses (dashed cyan lines). The centers are pointed by solid arrows. Bottom panels: corresponding LOS magnetograms of the three events observed by HMI.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. (a) Locations of the 134 CFs, which are marked with cyan dots (confined flares) and red dots (eruptive flares). The latitudes and longitudes of the Sun are drawn with gray lines. (b) Latitude distribution of the CFs. Positive (negative) latitude means northern (southern) hemisphere.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.2. Area

Compared with two-ribbon flares whose ribbons show separation (Qiu et al. 2002) or elongation (Li et al. 2015; Qiu et al. 2017), the outer ribbons of CFs hardly expand. Hence, the area keeps constant. In Figure 1(a3), the apparent area of the C4.2 flare enclosed by the ellipse is ∼452 Mm2. The true area (∼609 Mm2) after deprojection according to the flare longitude is defined as the total area (ACF). In the middle panels of Figure 1, the apparent areas of the three CFs are ∼13,008, ∼985, and ∼739 Mm2. The true areas are estimated to be ∼13,166, ∼1165, and ∼1423 Mm2, respectively. For the 134 CFs, the areas are calculated according to the fitted circles or ellipses, which range from 123 to ∼5000 Mm2 in most cases. Figure 3 shows the distribution of ACF. Note that the areas (13,166 and 23,962 Mm2) of two events significantly exceeding 5000 Mm2 are not taken into account in the histogram. We fit the distribution of ACF with a lognormal function (Zhang et al. 2010):

Equation (1)

The curve fitting is performed by using mpfit.pro and the result is superposed with a red line in Figure 3, where μ = 6.51 and σ = 0.66. The minima, maxima, mean values, and median values of the flare areas are listed in Table 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Distribution of the flare area. The result of the curve fitting using the lognormal function is superposed with a red line. Two values significantly exceeding 5000 Mm2 are excluded in this plot.

Standard image High-resolution image

We notice that there is a tendency of increasing area with flare class. In Figure 4(a), the flare areas are divided into three groups of roughly the same amount. In the range of 0–462 Mm2, only 13% (6/45) are M- and X-class CFs. The proportion rises to 36% (16/45) in the range of 462–915 Mm2. Above 915 Mm2, M- and X-class CFs account for 59% (26/44). Therefore, flares with larger magnitudes generally have larger areas. The sample of CFs in our study overlaps with that in Song & Tian (2018). They used an irregularly closed line rather than a circle or an oval to fit the flare ribbon. Although the methods are different, the derived areas of CFs are very close to each other.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Percentages of M- and X-class CFs in different groups of area (a), lifetime (b), total length of remote brightening (c), and average distance of remote brightening (d).

Standard image High-resolution image

It is widely believed that the magnetic configuration of CFs consists of a null point and the associated dome-shaped fan-spine structure. Assuming that the fan surface is a semisphere (Pariat et al. 2009, 2010), the height of the null point is equivalent to the radius of circular ribbons:

Equation (2)

Figure 5 shows the distribution of rCF, which lies in the range of 6–39 Mm with a mean value of ∼16 Mm (the largest two events are excluded). The estimated altitudes of null points are consistent with previous results (e.g., Sun et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2017; Hou et al. 2019; Li & Yang 2019; Yang et al. 2020). Song & Tian (2018) found that WL flares feature smaller areas than normal flares with the same flare magnitude, which is explained by the lower heights of null points where magnetic free energy is released and consequently there are larger energy fluxes in WL flares.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Distribution of the equivalent radius of flare ribbons.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.3. Lifetime

We determine the flare lifetime (τCF) using the start and end times. The former refers to the time when the GOES 1–8 Å flux begins to increase rapidly, and the latter refers to the time when the flux declines to a nearly constant level. In Figure 6, the bottom panels show AIA 131 Å images of the M8.7-class flare occurring in AR 12242 on 2014 December 17 (Chen et al. 2019). The top panel shows the SXR light curve of the flare. The black dashed lines denote the start time (04:25:34 UT), peak time (04:51:34 UT), and end time (07:07:34 UT) of the flare. The lifetime reaches ∼162 minutes accordingly.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. (a) SXR light curve of the M8.7-class flare occurring in AR 12242 on 2014 December 17. The three black dashed lines denote the start, peak, and end times of the flare. (b)–(d) AIA 131 Å images of the flare.

Standard image High-resolution image

If the SXR light curve has a second peak in the decay phase, which is probably due to another eruption somewhere else, the AIA 131 Å light curve of the relevant flare is used as a supplementary to determine τCF. In Figure 7, the bottom panels show AIA 131 Å images of the C3.0-class flare occurring in AR 11936 on 2013 December 28. The top panel shows the SXR light curve (blue line) and 131 Å light curve (orange line) of the flare. The black dashed lines denote the start time (12:40:34 UT), first peak time (12:47:34 UT), and end time (13:18:34 UT). There is only one peak in the EUV light curve, which corresponds to the first peak in SXR. The second peak (∼13:14:55 UT) in SXR is unrelated to the C3.0-class flare. Hence, the lifetime of the flare is ∼38 minutes, which is considerably shorter than the M8.7 flare.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. (a) SXR light curve (blue line) and 131 Å light curve (orange line) of the C3.0-class flare occurring in AR 11936 on 2013 December 28. The three black dashed lines denote the start, peak, and end times of the flare. (b)–(d) AIA 131 Å images of the flare.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 8 shows the distribution of τCF with a mean value of ∼50 minutes, which is 2 times larger than that of Lyα flares (Lu et al. 2021). Likewise, the distribution can be fitted with a lognormal function in Equation (1). The fitted curve is superposed with a red line, where μ = 3.60 and σ = 0.64. To explore the relationship between the area and lifetime of CFs, we draw a scatterplot in Figure 9. The two parameters have a positive correlation with a coefficient of ∼0.5. The timescale of conductive cooling of hot flare loops is expressed as (Cargill 1994; Zhang et al. 2019a)

Equation (3)

where ne, Te, and L represent the electron number density, temperature, and total length of a flare loop. For CFs with fan-spine topology, ACFL2τcc. That is to say, for flares with larger sizes, the cooling times become longer, which can easily interpret the linear correlation between ACF and τCF.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Distribution of the lifetime of CFs. The result of curve fitting using the lognormal function is superposed with a red line.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 9.

Figure 9. Scatterplot between the area (ACF) and lifetime (τCF) of CFs. The correlation coefficient is ∼0.50.

Standard image High-resolution image

According to the lifetime, we divide the 134 flares into three groups of the same amount, i.e., 0–25, 25–59, and 59–205 minutes. The percentages of M- and X-class CFs in the three groups are 26% (12/46), 20% (9/45), and 63% (27/43) (see Figure 4(b)). Hence, flares with larger magnitudes tend to have longer lifetimes. In the statistical investigation of CFs (Song & Tian 2018), the end time corresponds to the time when the flux decreases to a point halfway between the peak flux and the preflare level, leading to an average lifetime of 10–20 minutes, which is systematically shorter than our results. Besides, some of the CFs may experience an EUV late phase after the main flare phase observed in "warm" emission lines (e.g., 335 Å) as a result of additional heating (Sun et al. 2013). The much-extended lifetimes in EUV 335 Å compared with SXR lifetimes are out of the scope of this study.

3.4. Peak SXR Flux in 1–8 Å

For the 134 CFs, the peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å ranges from ∼5.9 × 10−7 to ∼3.9 × 10−4 W m−2. Figure 10 shows the distribution of the peak SXR flux. It is clear that the distribution could be nicely fitted with a power-law function (e.g., Dennis 1985; Lu & Hamilton 1991; Crosby et al. 1993; Christe et al. 2008) above ∼2 × 10−6 W m−2:

Equation (4)

where F denotes the peak flux, and α = −1.42 denotes the power-law index. The value of α is close to that of microflares at 3–6 keV and less than that of Lyα flares (Lu et al. 2021).

Figure 10.

Figure 10. Distribution of the peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å. The power-law index α is labeled.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.5. Relation with Remote Brightenings

As mentioned in Section 1, CFs are usually associated with remote brightenings or remote ribbons (Masson et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2017; Song et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2019). In Figure 1(a3), remote brightenings appear to the southwest of the C4.2-class flare, which is overlaid with a cyan line. The brightening has a total length (LRB) of ∼262 Mm and an average distance (DRB) of ∼171 Mm away from the flare center.

For the 134 CFs in this study, we searched for remote brightenings observed by AIA mainly in 304 and 1600 Å, finding that ∼57% (76/134) of CFs have associated remote brightenings, which is shown in Figure 11. Specifically, the association rates with B-, C-, M-, and X-class flares are 25%, 49%, 70%, and 88%, respectively (see Figure 12(a) and Table 3). The increasing rate with flare magnitude indicates that larger flares are more likely to produce remote brightenings. The total length of remote brightening or ribbon is denoted with LRB, and the average distance from the flare center is denoted with DRB. Figure 13 shows the distributions of LRB and DRB. It is revealed that LRB lies in the range of 6.2–381.0 Mm, with a mean value of ∼84.1 Mm. DRB lies in the range of 28.6–186.2 Mm, with a mean value of ∼89.1 Mm. Figure 14 shows the scatterplot between LRB and DRB, indicating a good correlation between the two parameters with a correlation coefficient of ∼0.65. In other words, remote brightenings further away from the main CFs are more likely to have longer extensions. A linear fitting (red dashed line) between the two parameters is performed, i.e.,

Equation (5)

Figure 11.

Figure 11. Proportions of CFs related to remote brightenings, type III radio bursts, jets, minifilament eruptions (FEs), and CMEs.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 12.

Figure 12. Association rates of CFs with remote brightenings (a), type III radio bursts (b), jets (c), minifilament eruptions (d), and CMEs (e) for B-, C-, M-, and X-class flares, respectively.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 13.

Figure 13. Distributions of the total length (LRB) and average distance (DRB) of remote brightenings associated with CFs.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 14.

Figure 14. Scatterplot between the total length (LRB) and average distance (DRB) of remote brightenings. The result of linear fitting is plotted with a red dashed line. The correlation coefficient (∼0.65) is labeled.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 3. Numbers of CFs Associated with RBs, Type III Radio Bursts, Jets, Minifilament Eruptions, and CMEs

ActivityB-classC-classM-classX-classTotal
CF482408134
RB14028776
type III03624363
jet14321469
FE12518751
CME01714637

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

To investigate the relationship between flare magnitude and association with remote brightenings, we divide LRB and DRB into three groups with the same numbers. The values of LRB are divided into 0–29, 29–80, and 80–381 Mm. The values of DRB are divided into 0–72, 72–93, and 93–186 Mm. The percentages of M- and X-class CFs in each group are plotted in Figures 4(c)–(d). The percentages increase systematically with both parameters, indicating that flares with larger magnitudes are more likely to produce longer remote brightenings or ribbons. In the 3D numerical simulations of jets confined by large-scale coronal loops (Wyper & DeVore 2016; Wyper et al. 2016), the aspect ratio of the fan-spine structure is between 1.0 and 2.7. In our study, the aspect ratio is defined as $\tfrac{{D}_{\mathrm{RB}}}{2{r}_{\mathrm{CF}}}$, which has a range of 0.8–6.7 and a mean value of ∼2.9. Hence, the results will impose constraints on numerical simulations of CFs in the future (Pontin et al. 2013).

3.6. Relation with Type III Radio Bursts

Flare-accelerated nonthermal electrons propagating along open field lines are capable of producing type III radio bursts (Benz et al. 2005; Morosan et al. 2014; Reid & Ratcliffe 2014; Zhang et al. 2015). In Figure 15, the top panel shows the 304 Å image of an M1.4-class CF in AR 11476 on 2012 May 8. The corresponding radio dynamic spectra recorded by the e-Callisto/BLEN7M station is displayed in the bottom panel. It is obvious that type III radio bursts around 700 MHz with fast frequency drift occur during the impulsive phase, when the release rate of magnetic free energy is maximum. The existence of radio bursts is confirmed by the WIND/WAVES observation.

Figure 15.

Figure 15. (a) AIA 304 Å image of the M1.4-class CF occurring in AR 11476 on 2012 May 8. (b) Radio dynamic spectra of the flare recorded by the e-Callisto/BLEN7M station. The arrows point to the type III radio bursts. The white dashed lines mark the start and peak times of the flare.

Standard image High-resolution image

For the 134 CFs, 47% (63/134) of them are accompanied with type III bursts during the impulsive phases, which is displayed in Figure 11. Note that those occurring in the preflare or decay phases are considered as unrelated events, which may result in an underestimate of the total amount. In Figure 12(b), the proportions of CFs related to type III bursts at various flare magnitudes are demonstrated, being 0%, 44%, 60%, and 38% for B-, C-, M-, and X-class CFs, respectively. The relatively lower proportion in B-class flares may be due to the limited number of samples. Hence, there is no correlation between the flare magnitude and type III bursts. In other words, the production of type III bursts depends mainly on the magnetic topology instead of flare energy (Krucker et al. 2011; Glesener et al. 2012; Duan et al. 2022).

3.7. Relation with Coronal Jets

As mentioned in Section 1, CFs are frequently associated with hot coronal jets observed in EUV wavelengths (Li & Yang 2019; Zhang & Ni 2019; Zhang 2020; Zhang et al. 2021) or cool surges observed in (Wang & Liu 2012; Xu et al. 2017). In Figure 1, the C4.2-class flare is accompanied by a blowout jet (Zhang et al. 2016a; Dai et al. 2021). For the 134 events, about half of them are accompanied by jets in 304 Å, which is displayed in Figure 11. In Figure 12(c), the proportions of CFs related to jets at various flare magnitudes are demonstrated, being 25%, 52%, 53%, and 50% for B-, C-, M-, and X-class flares, respectively. Therefore, there is no preference of jet production for CFs with larger magnitudes as well (Chae et al. 1999; Shibata et al. 2007; Duan et al. 2022).

3.8. Relation with Minifilament Eruptions

The occurrence of CFs is often associated with filament or minifilament eruptions (Wang & Liu 2012; Jiang et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2013; Yang & Zhang 2018). In this scenario, breakout-type magnetic reconnection takes place near the null point after the filament embedded in the fan dome rises up (Joshi et al. 2015; Wyper et al. 2017). The initiation of filament eruption may result from magnetic flux emergence (Li et al. 2017), rotation (Xu et al. 2017), or ideal MHD instabilities. The null-point reconnection not only accelerates nonthermal electrons to produce the circular ribbon in the chromosphere, but speeds up the filament eruption as well (Zhang et al. 2021).

Most of the homologous CFs in AR 12434 are triggered by minifilament eruptions (Zhang et al. 2016a, 2021). Figure 1(a2) shows the AIA 304 Å image of the C4.2-class flare, and the minifilament within the circular ribbon is pointed to by the arrow. For the 134 events, 38% (51/134) of them are associated with filament eruptions, which is displayed in Figure 11. Figure 12(d) shows the proportions of CFs related to minifilament eruptions: 25% (1/4), 30% (25/82), 45% (18/40), and 88% (7/8) for B-, C-, M-, and X-class flares, respectively. The increasing proportions with flare classes indicate that larger flares are more likely to be triggered by filament eruptions.

3.9. Relation with CMEs

As mentioned in the previous section, CFs are sometimes triggered by filament or minifilament eruptions. The eruption may also drive a CME observed in the WL coronagraphs (Joshi et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2020; Kumar et al. 2021). In Figure 16, the left panel shows the 304 Å image of the M7.3-class CF in AR 12036 on 2014 April 18 (Joshi et al. 2015). The associated CME at a speed of ∼1203 km s−1 in the LASCO/C2 FOV is displayed in the right panel. For the 134 CFs, only 28% (37/134) of them are related to CMEs, which is shown in Figure 11. It is evident that the association rate with CMEs is the lowest while the association rate with remote brightenings is the highest in our investigation. In other words, most of (∼72%) CFs are confined rather than eruptive (Wyper & DeVore 2016; Li et al. 2018; Yang & Zhang 2018). The CME association rates for B-, C-, M-, and X-class flares are 0%, 21%, 35%, and 75%, which is displayed in Figure 12(e). The increasing CME rates with flare magnitudes are consistent with previous findings, suggesting that larger flares are more likely to produce CMEs (Yashiro et al. 2005, 2006). The low percentage of CMEs is expected, since magnetic flux ropes are required to generate CMEs in most cases (Vourlidas et al. 2013). For eruptive flares, two parallel ribbons or S-shaped ribbons appear on both sides of the polarity inversion lines (Aulanier et al. 2012; Janvier et al. 2013; Savcheva et al. 2016). Therefore, the formation of a CF is unlikely in this situation.

Figure 16.

Figure 16. (a) AIA 304 Å image of the M7.3-class flare in AR 12036 on 2014 April 18. (b) WL image of the associated CME at a speed of 1203 km s−1 in the LASCO/C2 FOV.

Standard image High-resolution image

The distribution of the linear speed (VCME) of the 37 CMEs is drawn in Figure 17. The values of VCME lie in the range of 120–1203 km s−1, with an average speed of ∼517 km s−1, which is slightly higher than that of CMEs near solar maximum (Yashiro et al. 2004). Figure 18 shows the scatterplot between the peak flux in 1–8 Å and VCME of the 37 eruptive flares. A positive correlation is clearly demonstrated with a correlation coefficient of ∼0.37, which is consistent with the previous finding that CMEs associated with X-class flares are remarkably faster than those associated with C-class flares (Yashiro et al. 2005).

Figure 17.

Figure 17. Distribution of the CME speed (VCME) related to CFs.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 18.

Figure 18. Scatterplot between the peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å of CFs related to CMEs and VCME. The correlation coefficient is ∼0.37.

Standard image High-resolution image

Out of the 37 CMEs, 30 of them are normal or partial halo CMEs, and 7 of them are full halo CMEs. Some of them are jet-like, narrow CMEs with an angular width (WCME) less than 25°. Figures 19 and 20 show scatterplots between WCME and the peak flux of flares and VCME, respectively. It is clear that WCME have positive correlations with flare peak flux and VCME. Note that full halo CMEs (WCME = 360°) are not included when calculating the correlation coefficients. The result in Figure 20 suggests that faster CMEs tend to be wider, which is in line with previous statistical investigation (Yashiro et al. 2004).

Figure 19.

Figure 19. Scatterplot between the peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å of CFs related to CMEs and the CME angular widths (WCME). The correlation coefficient is ∼0.54.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 20.

Figure 20. Scatterplot between VCME and WCME, indicating faster CMEs tend to be wider. The correlation coefficient is ∼0.56.

Standard image High-resolution image

According to their speeds, the 37 CMEs are divided into three groups with roughly the same numbers. Figure 21(a) shows that the percentages of M- and X-class CFs are 33% (4/12), 42% (5/12), and 85% (11/13) for 0–360, 360–583, and 583–1203 km s−1, respectively. The association rates of CMEs with big flares increase with the CME speeds, which is consistent with the fact that faster CMEs are more related to flares with larger magnitudes (Yashiro et al. 2005, 2006). Figure 21(b) shows the percentages of filament eruptions for the three groups of CMEs, being 50% (6/12), 58% (7/12), and 54% (7/13). The association rates of CMEs with filament eruptions are independent of the CME speeds.

Figure 21.

Figure 21. (a) Percentages of M- and X-class flares for the three groups of CMEs. (b) Percentages of minifilament eruptions for the three groups of CMEs.

Standard image High-resolution image

Fast CMEs are capable of driving shock waves, which are associated with type II radio bursts (e.g., Ontiveros & Vourlidas 2009; Zucca et al. 2018; Mancuso et al. 2019). For the 37 eruptive CFs accompanied by CMEs, seven are associated with type II bursts, including two X-class (No. 3, 53) and five M-class (No. 34, 49, 77, 82, 83) flares. In Figure 22, the left panels show three CFs observed in 131 Å. The middle panels show the corresponding CMEs observed by LASCO/C2, with the apparent speeds being labeled. The related shock waves with relatively lower intensities are pointed to by the arrows. The right panels show radio dynamic spectra recorded by the e-Callisto stations, where type II radio bursts with drifting frequency are pointed to by the arrows.

Figure 22.

Figure 22. Left panels: three CFs observed by AIA in 131 Å. Middle panels: associated CMEs and shock waves observed by LASCO/C2. The apparent speeds of the CMEs are labeled. Right panels: radio dynamic spectra of the three events recorded by the e-Callisto stations, showing the corresponding type II radio bursts with drifting frequency.

Standard image High-resolution image

4. Conclusion and Discussion

In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive statistical analysis of 134 CFs observed by SDO/AIA from 2011 September to 2017 June, including 4 B-class, 82 C-class, 40 M-class, and 8 X-class flares. The physical properties of CFs are derived, including the location, area (ACF), equivalent radius (rCF) assuming a semispherical fan dome, lifetime (τCF), and peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å. Combining with the observations from the SOHO/LASCO, WIND/WAVES, and radio stations of the e-Callisto network, we also explored the relations with remote brightenings, type III radio bursts, coronal jets, minifilament eruptions, and CMEs. The main results are as follows:

  • 1.  
    All CFs are located in ARs, with the latitudes between −30° and 30°. Most of the areas are ≤5000 Mm2, with a mean value of ∼1215 Mm2. The distribution could be fitted with a lognormal function, where μ = 6.51 and σ = 0.66. The equivalent radii, representing the heights of magnetic null points, are between 6 and 87 Mm, with a mean value of ∼16.8 Mm.
  • 2.  
    The lifetimes are between 4 and 205 minutes with a mean value of ∼50 minutes. The distribution could also be fitted with a lognormal function, where μ = 3.6 and σ = 0.64. There is a positive correlation between the lifetime and area, indicating that CFs with larger sizes tend to have longer lifetimes. The peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å is well in accord with a power-law distribution with an index of −1.42.
  • 3.  
    For the 134 CFs, 57% of them are accompanied by remote brightenings or ribbons. The association rates with RBs increase with flare magnitudes. The mean values of total length (LRB) and average distance (DRB) of remote brightenings are ∼84 and ∼89 Mm, respectively. A positive correlation exists between the two parameters, i.e., DRB = 67.56 + 0.26LRB.
  • 4.  
    About 47% and 51% of the 134 CFs are related to type III radio bursts and jets, respectively. The association rates are independent of flare classes, meaning that the production rates of type III radio bursts and jets depend mainly on the magnetic configuration instead of the flare energy. About 38% of CFs are related to minifilament eruptions, and the association rates increase with flare classes.
  • 5.  
    Only 28% of CFs are related to CMEs, meaning that a majority of them are confined rather than eruptive events. This is in agreement with the relatively high association with remote brightenings considering the particular magnetic topology of CFs. The association rates with CMEs increase with flare magnitudes. The apparent speeds of CMEs are between 120 and 1203 km s−1, with a mean value of ∼517 km s−1. There is a positive correlation between the CME speed and peak SXR flux in 1–8 Å. The angular widths of CMEs (WCME) are between 13° and 360°. A linear correlation exists between the angular width and apparent speed, indicating that faster CMEs tend to be wider.

Li et al. (2021) analyzed 719 flares during 2010–2019, finding that the total unsigned magnetic flux (ΦAR) plays a decisive role in determining the eruptive character of a flare. For the 134 CFs, only 37 events are eruptive. The mean and median values of the total area for the eruptive CFs are significantly greater than confined CFs. Hence, it is worthwhile investigating the total magnetic fluxes of CFs and justifying the conclusion of Li et al. (2021).

Of course, the current statistical work has limitations. First, the sample is not large enough, leading to uncertainties in the results. Those flares with irregular or complex ribbons are excluded to minimize the ambiguity. The 134 flares were observed by SDO/AIA from 2011 September to 2017 June, including four B-class and eight X-class flares. The numbers of CFs will certainly grow after extending the dates to 2021 June, for instance. Second, the shapes of outer ribbons are fitted with circles or ellipses, which is suitable in most cases. However, the fitting is unsatisfactory for irregular ribbons (Joshi et al. 2015). The method in Song & Tian (2018) seems to be more appropriate. Besides, the assumption of semispherical fan surface is not always valid to estimate the heights of null points (Vemareddy & Wiegelmann 2014). Third, the values of apparent speeds and angular widths of CMEs suffer from projection effects from a single viewpoint. 3D reconstruction of the shapes of CMEs is helpful to minimize this effect (Zhang 2022). Finally, the properties of CFs are still incomplete. The distribution of thermal energy and association rate with QPPs will be the focus of our next paper. The results are important to get a better understanding of solar flares and provide valuable constraints on 3D MHD simulations. In the future, new insights into CFs and the related activities will be obtained from observations of the Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (Krucker et al. 2020) on board Solar Orbiter (Müller et al. 2020).

The authors appreciate the referee for valuable suggestions and comments. The e-Callisto data are courtesy of the Institute for Data Science FHNW Brugg/Windisch, Switzerland. SDO is a mission of NASA's Living With a Star program. The AIA and HMI data are courtesy of the NASA/SDO science teams. This work is supported by NSFC grants (No. 11790302, 11790300), and the Strategic Priority Research Program on Space Science, CAS (XDA15052200, XDA15320301).

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4365/ac5f4c