Abstract
Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with their relativistic jets pointed toward the observer form a subclass of luminous γ-ray sources commonly known as blazars. The study of blazars is essential to improve our understanding of the AGNs emission mechanisms and evolution, as well as to map the extragalactic background light. To do so, however, one needs to classify and measure a redshift for a large sample of these sources correctly. The Third Fermi-LAT Catalog of High-Energy Sources (3FHL) contains ≈1160 blazars reported at energies greater than 10 GeV. However, ∼25% of these sources are unclassified and ∼50% lack redshift information. To increase the spectral completeness of the 3FHL catalog, we are working on an optical spectroscopic follow-up campaign using 4 m and 8 m telescopes. In this paper, we present the results of the second part of this campaign, where we observed 23 blazars using the 4 m telescope at Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory in Chile. We report that all the 23 sources are classified as BL Lacs, a confirmed redshift measurement for three sources, a redshift lower limit for two sources, and a tentative redshift measurement for three sources.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
1. Introduction
Blazars are a peculiar class of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) that dominate the observable γ-ray universe because of their extreme properties and abundant population. The blazar properties are a result of nonthermal emitting plasma traveling toward the observer, causing relativistic amplification of the flux. This leads to an amplification of low-energy photons in the medium to intense levels via the inverse Compton process, making blazars valuable sources to understand the physics of an AGN. The Third Fermi-LAT Catalog of High-Energy Sources (3FHL; Ajello et al. 2017), which encompasses seven years of observations made by the Large Area Telescope (LAT) on board the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (Atwood et al. 2009), contains more than 1500 sources detected at >10 GeV, the vast majority of which (≈1160) are blazars (Ajello et al. 2017).
Innovative scientific results can be obtained using the blazar data collected by the Fermi-LAT in the γ-ray regime, provided that the redshift (z) of the observed blazar source is known. These are not only limited to blazar physics, such as understanding their basic emission processes (e.g., Ghisellini et al. 2017) or their evolution with redshift (Ajello et al. 2014), but also to other areas of study, like understanding the extragalactic background light, which encompasses all the radiation emitted by stars and galaxies and reprocessed radiation from interstellar dust, and its evolution with z (Ackermann et al. 2012; Domínguez et al. 2013). Out of the confirmed blazar sources reported in the 3FHL catalog, a redshift measurement of only ≈50% of sources is present (Ajello et al. 2017). To overcome this limitation, extensive optical spectroscopic campaigns, targeting those 3FHL objects still lacking redshift and classification, must be performed.
Besides being used for redshift determination, optical spectroscopy campaigns of blazars are also essential to distinguish between blazar subclasses, namely BL Lacs (BLL) and flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs). FSRQs are generally high-redshift objects with an average luminosity larger than that of the BLL (Padovani 1992; Paiano et al. 2017). As a result, the emission lines in the BLL spectra are weak or absent, and the lines in FSRQs are extremely prominent. This is seen by the difference in the equivalent width (EW) of the lines where, generally, FSRQ have lines with EW > 5 Å and BLL have lines with EW < 5 Å (Urry & Padovani 1995; Ghisellini et al. 2017). The blazar sources not classified as FSRQ or BLL are listed as blazar candidates of an uncertain type (BCU) in the 3FHL catalog and constitute ≈25% of the reported blazar sample (Ajello et al. 2017). Obtaining a spectroscopically complete classification of the blazars observed by Fermi-LAT in the γ-ray regime is essential to validate claims of different cosmological evolution of the two classes (Ajello et al. 2012, 2014).
The ground-based telescopes used in the spectroscopy campaigns are generally of the 4, 8, and 10 m class type. While the 10 and 8 m class telescopes are shown to be significantly more effective in obtaining redshift measurements for blazars (60%–80% versus 25%–40% success rate; see, e.g., Paiano et al. 2017; Marchesi et al. 2018), even 4 m class telescopes have proven to be useful for effectively distinguishing between the two different blazar subclasses (see Shaw et al.2013; Massaro et al. 2014; Paggi et al. 2014; Landoni et al. 2015; Ricci et al. 2015; Álvarez Crespo et al. 2016a, 2016b; Marchesini et al. 2016).
This work is part of a larger spectroscopic follow-up campaign to classify the BCUs in the 3FHL catalog and to measure their redshift. The first part of the campaign took place in the second half of 2017, when we observed 28 sources in seven nights of observations with the 4 m telescope at the Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO). The results of this work are reported in Marchesi et al. (2018): we classified 27 out of 28 sources as BL Lacs, while the remaining object was found to be an FSRQ. Furthermore, we measured a redshift for three sources and set a lower limit on z for other four objects; the farthest object in our KPNO sample has z > 0.836. The spectroscopic campaign will then continue with seven nights of observations with the 4 m telescope at the Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory (CTIO) in Chile and five nights of observations with the 8 m Gemini-N and Gemini-S telescopes (to be performed in 2019). In this work, we report the results of the observations made during the first four nights at CTIO. Our source sample contains 23 BCUs in the 3FHL catalog without a redshift measurement. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reports the criteria used in sample selection, Section 3 describes the methodology used for the source observation and spectral extraction procedures, Section 4 lists the results of this work, both for each individual source and also in general terms, while Section 5 reports the conclusions inferred from this spectroscopic campaign.
2. Sample Selection
We selected the 23 objects in our sample among the BCUs in the 3FHL catalog, using the following three criteria.
- 1.The object should have a measured optical magnitude measurement, and it should be V ≤ 19.5. Based on previous works, sources with a magnitude of V > 19.5 require more than two hours of observations to obtain an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), therefore, significantly reducing the number of sources that one can observe in a night.
- 2.The 3FHL source should be bright in the hard γ-ray spectral regime ( erg s−1 cm−2). Selecting 3FHL objects bright in the 50–150 GeV band ensures that the completeness of the 3FHL catalog evolves to lower fluxes as more optical observations are performed.
- 3.The target should be observable from Cerro Tololo with an altitude above the horizon δ > 40° (i.e., with an air mass <1.5); this corresponds to a decl. range of −80° < decl. < 20°. The target should also be observable in October, when the observations take place (i.e., it should have R.A. ≥ 09h0m00s and R.A. ≤ 0h30m00s).
A total of 77 3FHL sources satisfy all of these criteria. Our 23 sources were selected among these 77 objects with the goal of covering a wide range of optical magnitudes (V = [16–19.5]) and, consequently, of potential redshifts and luminosities. In Figure 1, we show the normalized V-band magnitude distribution of our sources, compared with the 1 of the overall population of the 173 3FHL BCUs that still lack redshift measurements and have available magnitude information. We also plot the magnitude distribution of the 28 sources studied in Marchesi et al. (2018), where we sampled a larger number of bright sources (V < 16), which all turned out to be featureless BL Lacs. The sources used in our sample and their properties are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. List of Sources and Their Properties Sorted in the Order of Increasing R.A. Values
3FHL Name | Counterpart | R.A. | Decl. | mag | Obs. Date | Exposure | Continuum Slope | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
3FHL J0002.1−6728 | SUMSS J000215−672653 | 00:02:15.21 | −67:26:52.91 | 0.0253 | 18.6 | 2018 Jun 1 | 5400 | −1.44 |
3FHL J0935.2−1735 | NVSS J093514−173658 | 09:35:14.77 | −17:36:58.30 | 0.0643 | 17.8 | 2018 Jun 1 | 3900 | −0.12 |
3FHL J0936.4−2109 | 1RXS J093622.9−211031 | 09:36:23.08 | −21:10:39.00 | 0.0574 | 18.5 | 2018 Jun 2, 3 | 5100 | −0.28 |
3FHL J1030.6−2029 | NVSS J103040−203032 | 10:30:40.46 | −20:30:32.70 | 0.0469 | 18.4 | 2018 Jun 3 | 3300 | −1.91 |
3FHL J1042.8+0055 | RBS 895 | 10:43:03.84 | +00:54:20.43 | 0.0419 | 19.3 | 2018 Jun 4 | 5600 | −1.03 |
3FHL J1130.5−7801 | SUMSS J113032−780105 | 11:30:32.92 | −78:01:05.20 | 0.1921 | 17.6 | 2018 Jun 2 | 3400 | −1.07 |
3FHL J1155.5−3418 | NVSS J115520−341718 | 11:55:20.43 | −34:17:18.30 | 0.0702 | 16.8 | 2018 Jun 1 | 2400 | −1.10 |
3FHL J1212.1−2328 | PMN J1212−2327 | 12:12:04.54 | −23:27:42.00 | 0.0656 | 18.2 | 2018 Jun 1 | 4500 | −0.77 |
3FHL J1223.5−3033 | NVSS J122337−303246 | 12:23:37.32 | −30:32:46.10 | 0.0593 | 17.2 | 2018 Jun 2 | 3400 | −2.15 |
3FHL J1229.7−5304 | AT20G J122939−530332 | 12:29:39.93 | −53:03:32.20 | 0.1293 | 17.8 | 2018 Jun 3 | 2300 | −0.44 |
3FHL J1315.9−0732 | WISE J131552.98−073301.9 | 13:15:53.00 | −07:33:02.07 | 0.0352 | 18.2 | 2018 Jun 4 | 4500 | −0.87 |
3FHL J1433.5−7304 | GALEX J143343.0−730437 | 14:33:42.81 | −73:04:36.84 | 0.1592 | 17.9 | 2018 Jun 1 | 4000 | −0.81 |
3FHL J1439.4−2524 | NVSS J143934−252458 | 14:39:34.66 | −25:24:59.10 | 0.0862 | 16.2 | 2018 Jun 3 | 2800 | −0.01 |
3FHL J1605.0−1140 | WISE J160517.53−113926.8 | 16:05:17.53 | −11:39:26.83 | 0.2584 | 18.7 | 2018 Jun 4 | 5400 | −0.35 |
3FHL J1612.3−3100 | NVSS J161219−305937 | 16:12:19.95 | −30:59:37.80 | 0.2003 | 18.1 | 2018 Jun 2 | 3600 | −1.11 |
3FHL J1640.1+0629 | NVSS J164011+062827 | 16:40:11.06 | +06:28:27.70 | 0.0695 | 18.6 | 2018 Jun 2 | 3800 | −1.71 |
3FHL J1842.4−5841 | 1RXSJ184230.6−584202 | 18:42:29.67 | −58:41:57.19 | 0.0848 | 17.5 | 2018 Jun 1 | 3600 | −1.67 |
3FHL J1924.2−1548 | NVSS J192411−154902 | 19:24:11.82 | −15:49:02.10 | 0.1491 | 17.7 | 2018 Jun 3 | 3600 | −1.35 |
3FHL J2034.9−4200 | SUMSS J203451−420024 | 20:34:51.06 | −42:00:37.60 | 0.0360 | 17.2 | 2018 Jun 2, 4 | 3900 | −0.62 |
3FHL J2041.7−7319 | SUMSS J204201−731911 | 20:42:01.85 | −73:19:13.01 | 0.0544 | 18.2 | 2018 Jun 4 | 3400 | −4.47 |
3FHL J2240.3−5240 | SUMSS J224017−524111 | 22:40:17.64 | −52:41:13.07 | 0.0118 | 16.7 | 2018 Jun 4 | 1950 | −5.84 |
3FHL J2321.8−6437 | PMN J2321−6438 | 23:21:42.17 | −64:38:06.90 | 0.02 | 17.4 | 2018 Jun 4 | 2800 | −0.06 |
3FHL J2339.2−7404 | 1RXS J233919.8−740439 | 23:39:20.88 | −74:04:36.12 | 0.0262 | 16.1 | 2018 Jun 4 | 1500 | −0.65 |
Note. (1): 3FHL catalog (Ajello et al. 2017) name for the source. (2): Optical, infrared, X-ray, or radio counterpart of the source. (3) R.A. (4) decl. (5) value obtained using the measurements of Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) and the NASA/IPAC infrared science archive online tool. (6) V-band magnitude. (7) Date of observation. (8) Exposure time (in seconds). (9) Slope of continuum fit obtained from the observed fits file.
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
3. Observations and Data Analysis
All of the sources in our sample were observed using the 4 m Blanco telescope located at the CTIO in Chile. The spectra were obtained using the Cerro Tololo Ohio State Multi-Object Spectrograph (COSMOS) with the red grism and the 09 slit. This experimental setup corresponds to a dispersion of ∼4 Å pixel−1 over a wavelength range of λ = [5000–8000] Å and a spectral resolution of R ∼ 2100. The data were taken with the slit aligned along the parallactic angle. The seeing was 13 during the first and third night, 1'' during the second night, and 22 in the last night, respectively; all four nights were photometric.
All spectra reported here are obtained by combining at least three individual observations of the source with varying exposure times. This allows us to reduce both instrumental effects and cosmic-ray contribution. The data reduction is done following a standard procedure: the final spectra are all bias subtracted, flat normalized, and corrected for bad pixels. We normalize the flat field to remove any wavelength-dependent variations that could be present in the flat-field source but not in the observed spectrum. This is done by fitting a cubic spline function on the calibration spectrum and taking a ratio of the flat field to the derived fit (see the response function in Massey 1997). We choose an order of >5 for the cubic spline function fit with an χ2 value less than 1 to account for all variable features in the flat field. An additional visual inspection is also done on the combined spectra to remove any artificial features that may still be present. This data reduction and spectral extraction is done using the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF) pipeline (Tody 1986).
The wavelength calibration for each source is done using the Hg–Ne lamp; we took a lamp spectrum after each observation of a source to avoid potential shifts in the pixel-λ calibration due to changes in the telescope position during the night. Finally, all spectra were flux-calibrated using a spectroscopic standard, which were observed using the same 09 slit used in the rest of the analysis, and then corrected for the Galactic reddening using the extinction law by Cardelli et al. (1989) and the E(B − V) value based on the Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) measurements, as reported in the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive.1
4. Spectral Analysis
To visually enhance the spectral features of our sources, in Figure 2, we report the normalized spectra of the objects in our sample. These normalized spectra are obtained by dividing the flux-calibrated spectra using a continuum fit (an approach similar to the one reported in Landoni et al. 2018). The continuum is taken to be a power law unless the optical shape is more complex, in which this case, the preferred fit is described in Section 4.1. The S/N of the normalized spectrum is then measured in a minimum of five individual featureless regions in the spectrum with a width of Δλ ≈ 40 Å. The spectral analysis results for each source, including the computed S/N, are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Results Obtained from Spectral Analysis Discussed in Section 4
Source | S/N | Spectral Line | Observed λ (Å) | Line Type | Redshift |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rest Frame λ (Å) | |||||
3FHL J0002.1−6728 | 41.4 | ||||
3FHL J0935.2−1735 | 51.5 | ||||
3FHL J0936.4−2109 | 27.2 | Mg ii (2797) | 6176 | Absorption | >1.197* |
Mg ii (2803) | 6160 | Absorption | |||
3FHL J1030.6−2029 | 29.3 | Mg ii (2797) | 5579 | Absorption | >0.995 |
Mg ii (2803) | 5591 | Absorption | |||
3FHL J1042.8+0055 | 46.6 | ||||
3FHL J1130.5−7801 | 72.2 | ||||
3FHL J1155.5−3418 | 42.7 | Mg ii (2797) | 5174 | Absorption | >0.849 |
Mg ii (2803) | 5185 | Absorption | |||
3FHL J1212.1−2328 | 102.8 | O iii (5007) | 8345 | Emission | 0.666 |
3FHL J1223.5−3033 | 46.5 | Mg ii (2797) | 5245 | Absorption | >0.875* |
Mg ii (2803) | 5256 | Absorption | |||
3FHL J1229.7−5304 | 78.6 | ||||
3FHL J1315.9−0732 | 60.8 | ||||
3FHL J1433.5−7304 | 64.9 | G band (4304) | 5165 | Absorption | 0.200 |
Mg i (5175) | 6209 | Absorption | |||
Ca+Fe (5269) | 6340 | Absorption | |||
Na (5895) | 7074 | Absorption | |||
(6562) | 7876 | Absorption | |||
3FHL J1439.4−2524 | 82.7 | Mg i (5175) | 6008 | Absorption | 0.16 |
Ca+Fe (5269) | 6115 | Absorption | |||
NaD (5892) | 6835 | Absorption | |||
3FHL J1605.0−1140 | 17.2 | O ii (3727) | 6801 | Emission | 0.358* |
(or) O iii (5007) | 6801 | Emission | 0.824* | ||
3FHL J1612.3−3100 | 75.4 | ||||
3FHL J1640.1+0629 | 83.1 | ||||
3FHL J1842.4−5841 | 32.7 | ||||
3FHL J1924.2−1548 | 64.4 | ||||
3FHL J2034.9−4200 | 33.4 | ||||
3FHL J2041.7−7319 | 70.1 | ||||
3FHL J2240.3−5240 | 71.2 | ||||
3FHL J2321.8−6437 | 33.7 | ||||
3FHL J2339.2−7404 | 45.5 |
Note. The redshift measurement values marked with a * are Tentative z measurements.
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
To find a redshift measurement, each spectrum was visually inspected for any absorption or emission feature. Any potential feature that matched with known atmospheric lines2 was not taken into consideration. To test the reliability of any potential feature, its existence was verified in each of the individual spectral files used to obtain the final combined spectrum shown in Figure 2 or the zoomed spectrum shown in Figure 3. For example, the broad emission feature seen in the spectrum of 3FHL J0935.2-1735 around 5633 Å is not found in the individual files and is thus considered to be an artifact. The verified features are then matched with common blazar lines, such as the Mg ii doublet lines (2797 and 2803 Å) or O iii line (5007 Å), to compute the redshift.
All the sources in our sample were classified as BLL based on their spectral properties. Out of the 23 sources, we were able to determine a redshift measurement for three sources, a lower limit on the redshift for two of them, and a tentative redshift measurement for three of them. The remaining 15 sources in our sample were found to be featureless. Details for some of the sources for which a spectral feature or redshift is found are given in Section 4.1. These features are also listed in Table 2 with the derived redshift measurement.
4.1. Comments on Individual Sources
3FHL J0936.4-2109: This BCU is associated with the X-ray source 1RXS J093622.9-211031. The optical spectrum of this source shows the presence of two absorption features at 6176 and 6160 Å. If they are associated with the Mg ii doublet, a redshift measurement of 1.1974 and 1.1976 is obtained, respectively. Corresponding to this z value, other typical features observed in blazars, either in emission or in absorption (e.g., the Ca ii doublet, the G band, O ii or O iii features) will fall out of our observed wavelength range of 5000–8200 Å. We report a tentative lower limit of the redshift as z > 1.197 for this BLL.
3FHL J1030.6-2029: This source is associated with the radio source NVSS J103040-203032. Its optical spectrum shows the presence of the Mg ii doublet at 5579 Å and 5591 Å, respectively. This gives a redshift lower limit of z > 0.995.
3FHL J1042.8+0055: This source is associated with the X-ray source RBS 0895. A redshift value of 0.73 exists in the literature (Boyle et al. 1990); however, the authors flagged it as an uncertain measurement. We were not able to detect any absorption or emission lines in our optical spectrum, so we classify this source as a BLL.
3FHL J1155.5-3418: This source is associated with the radio source NVSS J115520-341718. The Mg ii doublet is identified in the optical spectrum of the source at 5174 Å and 5185 Å, allowing us to measure the lower limit of the redshift as z > 0.849.
3FHL J1212.1-2328: This source is associated with the radio source PMN J1212-2327. We obtain an optical spectrum with an S/N of 102.8 and detect an emission feature at 8345 Å with an EW of 0.8 Å. If it is associated to the O iii line, we derive a redshift z = 0.666.
3FHL J1223.5-3033: This source is associated with the radio source NVSS J122337-303246. We see possible absorption features at 5245, 5256, 5577, and 6341 Å. If the 5245 and 5256 Å absorption features are associated with the Mg ii line, a redshift of 0.875 is measured. However, we were not able to detect the presence of any other features and also identify the features at 5577 and 6341 Å to confirm the redshift measurement with certainty. This source is thus classified as a BLL, and a tentative lower limit of z > 0.875 is reported.
3FHL J1433.5-7304: This source is associated with the X-ray source 1RXS J143343.2-730433. One emission feature (Hα) and four absorption features (G-band, Mg i, Na and Ca+Fe) are detected in the spectrum. This gives us a redshift measurement of z = 0.200.
3FHL J1439.4-2524: This source is associated with the radio source NVSS J143934-252458. We detect two strong absorption lines at 6008 and 6115 Å and an absorption line at 6835 Å, which is close to an atmospheric feature (6845 Å) in its optical spectrum. If these lines are associated with the Mg i, Ca+Fe, and NaD absorption features, respectively, a redshift of z = 0.16 is derived.
3FHL J1605.0-1140: The infrared counterpart of this source is WISE J160517.53-113926.8. The optical spectrum shows the presence of an emission feature at 6801 Å with an EW of 7.044 Å. This feature can be associated with the O ii or O iii line, giving a redshift of 0.824 or 0.358, respectively; however, with no significant detection of any other emission or absorption features and a low S/N measurement, the redshift of this source cannot be measured with certainty.
5. Conclusion
In this work, we present the results the optical spectroscopic campaign directed toward rendering the 3FHL spectroscopically complete sample using the COSMOS spectrograph mounted on the 4 m Blanco telescope at CTIO in Chile. We observed 23 extragalactic sources classified as BCU (blazars of uncertain classification) in the 3FHL catalog.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageAll of the objects in our source sample are classified as BLL based on their observed optical spectrum. In the 3FHL catalog, out of the already classified 901 blazars, ≈84.1% sources are classified as BLL. Moreover out of the 28 sources observed by Marchesi et al. (2018), 27 are identified as BLL, denoting that our results are not surprising.
Out of the 23 BLLs in our sample, we find a reliable redshift measurement for three sources, a reliable redshift constraint for two sources, a tentative redshift constraint for three sources, and a featureless spectrum with no redshift measurement for the remaining 15 sources. Combining our results with the results of Marchesi et al. (2018), our optical spectroscopic campaign reports a redshift measurement for ≈23.5% of the observed BLL sources using 4 m telescopes. This measurement is in line with the expected consistency of 10%–35%, obtained for redshift determination of pure BLL using 4 m telescopes (Landoni et al. 2015; Ricci et al. 2015; Álvarez Crespo et al. 2016a; Peña-Herazo et al. 2017). Moreover, our work combined, with Marchesi et al. (2018), also classifies 51 blazars of previously uncertain classification as either BLL or FSRQs.
The third and fourth part of our spectroscopic campaign will include observations from the 4 m CTIO telescope and the 8 m Gemini-N and Gemini-S telescopes, respectively.3 Additionally, we also aim to extend the campaign by inducing follow-up observations,4 similar to Kaur et al. (2019), using the Swift X-ray telescope. These follow-up observations in the X-ray regime will help us confirm the classification of the blazar sources contributing to the spectral completion of the 3FHL catalog.
A.D. acknowledges funding support from NSF through grant AST-1715256. S.M. acknowledges support from NASA contract 80NSSC17K0503. The authors thank Alberto Alvarez and Sean Points for the help provided during the observing nights at CTIO. This work made use of the TOPCAT software (Taylor 2005) for the analysis of data tables.
Footnotes
- 1
- 2
- 3
Fermi Guest Investigator Program Cycle 11, ID:111128, PI: S. Marchesi.
- 4
Swift Cycle 14, prop ID 1417063 PI: M. Ajello.