Synthetic Absorption Lines from Simulations of Multiphase Gas in Galactic Winds

, , and

Published 2021 September 29 © 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Lita M. de la Cruz et al 2021 ApJ 919 112 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ac04ac

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/919/2/112

Abstract

Supernova-driven galactic winds are multiphase streams of gas that are often observed flowing at a range of velocities out of star-forming regions in galaxies. In this study, we use high-resolution 3D simulations of multiphase galactic winds modeled with the hydrodynamics code Cholla to investigate the connection between numerical studies and observations. Using a simulated interaction between a hot T ∼ 107 K supernova-driven wind and a cool T ∼ 104 K cloud of interstellar material, we create mock observables, including the optical depth (τ) and covering fraction (Cf), of six commonly observed ions (Si ii, C ii, Si iv, C iv, N v, and O vi) as a function of gas velocity. We compare our mock observables to surveys of galactic winds in the literature, finding good agreement with velocities and profiles of the low ions. We then compute "empirical" values for the optical depth and covering fraction following observational techniques, and compare them to the values calculated directly from the simulation data. We find that the empirically computed values tend to underestimate the "true" value of τ for ions with high optical depth and overestimate the "true" value of τ for ions with low optical depth relative to the simulated data. The empirically estimated covering fractions match our direct calculations very well for the low-ionization ions; for the high-ionization ions, the empirical covering fractions underestimate the directly computed values by up to ∼40%.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

In 1963, an optical emission-line spectrum revealed high-velocity outflows of cool ionized gas in the central region of the nearby irregular galaxy M82 (Lynds & Sandage 1963). The high velocities indicated an outburst powered by a massive amount of energy—a phenomenon that has since captivated the interest of researchers for almost 60 years. Subsequent observations have revealed that outflows are common in star-forming galaxies, driven by the momentum and energy input of massive stars in the form of supernovae, stellar winds, cosmic rays, and radiation (see Heckman et al. 1993; Veilleux et al. 2005; Heckman & Thompson 2017; Zhang 2018; Veilleux et al. 2020, for reviews).

Outflows are now understood to play an important role in the evolution of galaxies and the intergalactic medium (IGM). By controlling the amount of gas in galaxies available to convert into stars, winds limit the baryon content of galaxies (Larson 1974; Somerville & Primack 1999; Kereš et al. 2005; Crain et al. 2009; Davé et al. 2011; Behroozi et al. 2013; Moster et al. 2013; Genel et al. 2014; Muratov & Baulin 2015). By transporting metals out of star-forming regions, outflows regulate the metallicity of stars and gas in galaxies, setting the mass–metallicity relation (Tremonti et al. 2004). This same process enriches the circumgalactic medium (CGM) and IGM with metals (Simcoe et al. 2004; Steidel et al. 2010; Werk et al. 2013; Hopkins et al. 2014; Rubin et al. 2014). Thus, understanding the process by which outflows remove gas from galaxies is key to understanding galaxy evolution.

Supernovae-driven winds are multiphase and have been observed at a broad range of densities and temperatures (Heckman et al. 1990; Davé et al. 1998; Martin 2005; Strickland & Heckman 2009; Erb et al. 2012; Rubin et al. 2014). Generating a complete picture of multiphase winds, however, requires great time and effort and the use of many different observational instruments. With the high spatial resolution of the Chandra X-ray Observatory, the hot, 107 K, supersonic wind created by supernova explosions can be observed directly, but only for the closest galaxies (Griffiths et al. 2000; Strickland & Heckman 2007). This phase in any case carries very little of the mass that eventually leaves galaxies in spite of its role as a primary driver; only by interacting with denser ISM phases is the hot, fast wind able to create a massive outflow.

The cooler (T < 106 K), indirectly accelerated gas in outflows is commonly studied by observers because of the many strong absorption and emission lines (Heckman et al. 2000). Given the n2 dependence on density, detecting outflows in emission lines of distant galaxies tends to be challenging, so outflows in these sources are more typically studied via absorption lines. Measurements of absorption line profiles give direct insight into the velocity distribution and column density of the outflowing gas, as well as indirect measurements of metallicity, optical depth, covering fraction, and mass outflow rates. Commonly detected species in absorption include C, N, O, Mg, Ca, Si, S, and Fe. These species in their various ionization states probe a range of gas temperatures ranging from cold neutral gas (T ∼ 103 K) to hot ionized gas (T ∼ 106 K) (see Table 1).

Table 1. Ionic Species Used in Absorption Line Analysis

Ionlog10(T) λ0,w (Å) λ0,s (Å) fw fs $\tfrac{n}{{n}_{{\rm{H}}}}$
Si ii a 3.8–4.3119312600.58201.18003.47e−5
C ii b 3.9–4.99049040.16800.33602.45e−4
Si iv b 4.6–5.2140313940.26000.52403.47e−5
C iv b 4.9–5.3155115480.09520.19002.45e−4
N v a 5.1–5.5124312390.07770.15608.51e−5
O vi a 5.3–5.7103810320.06580.13254.90e−4

Notes.

Col. 1: Ion species.

Col. 2: Gas temperature range (K), calculated using the full width at half maximum range for collisionally ionized gas (see, e.g., Figure 6 of Tumlinson et al. 2017).

Col. 3: Rest-wavelength for weak absorption lines.

Col. 4: Rest-wavelength for strong absorption lines.

Col. 5: Oscillator strength for weak absorption lines.

Col. 6: Oscillator strength for strong absorption lines.

Col. 7: Solar abundance (relative to hydrogen) for each ionic species.

a Morton (2003). b Verner et al. (1994).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The installation of the highly sensitive Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) significantly increased the efficiency of observations of this neutral and ionized gas phase in the outskirts of nearby UV-bright starburst galaxies (Shull 2009; Green et al. 2012; Leitherer et al. 2013; Chisholm et al. 2015, 2016a, 2016b, 2017; Wood et al. 2015). Tumlinson et al. (2011) and Thom et al. (2011) used the COS to study the gaseous halos of low-redshift galaxies and examined the metallicity and ionization of O vi absorption lines that surrounded these halos. In a particularly detailed observation of a gravitationally lensed galaxy, Chisholm et al. (2018) studied the O vi doublet (λ = 1032 Å), one of the few observable tracers that is provisionally created during mass-loading (a mixing phase between the cool and hot gas). That study found that the O vi doublet is a unique species that has two regimes: at high velocity, it mimics low-ionization optically thin lines, and at low velocity, it mimics strong saturated lines. In many cases, the creation of this species is ambiguous, and it can be found in many different environments such as galaxies, the CGM, filaments, and the IGM (Savage et al. 1998; Tripp et al. 2001; Lehner et al. 2009; Werk et al. 2016).

There are many observational studies of the warm neutral and (photo)ionized 104 K gas in outflows because this phase has strong absorption and emission lines in the rest-frame UV and optical (Heckman et al. 2000). Early optical emission-line studies of galactic outflows used narrow-band images and long-slit spectroscopy of nearly edge-on bright IR galaxies (McCarthy et al. 1987; Heckman et al. 1990; Lehnert & Heckman 1996). Other observational work uses absorption lines from the Na i "D" doublet in far-IR starburst galaxies (Heckman et al. 2000; Martin 2005; Rupke et al. 2005a). Due to its low ionization potential of 5.1 eV, ground state Na i D can effectively probe the neutral gas phase (T ≲ 8000 K) in galactic winds. The ubiquity of this doublet in ultraluminous IR galaxies (ULIRGs) makes it a regularly used tracer in studies of these systems. However, this delicate species is shielded from photoionization by the immense amount of dust found in ULIRGS (Heckman et al. 2000, 2001; Martin 2006; Heckman & Thompson 2017), and it is easily destroyed in less dusty systems. UV absorption lines that are redshifted into the optical, such as Mg ii and Fe ii, can be used to study outflows of gas at T ∼ 104 K in higher-redshift galaxies via stacking of spectra (Weiner et al. 2009; Maltby et al. 2019; Sugahara et al. 2019). These species can survive the strong UV radiation fields, but require high spectral resolution, and individual observations generally require bright galaxies with high star formation rates to achieve an adequate signal-to-noise (Kornei et al. 2012; Rubin et al. 2014). In some unique cases, such as gravitationally lensed systems, these species can be studied in detail in high-redshift galaxies (z > 2.5) with lower star formation rates (Pettini et al. 2002; Chisholm et al. 2018).

On the theoretical side too, much effort has been spent trying to understand the physics of galactic outflows. However, understanding the different processes that govern the different phases of gas has proven to be challenging. Early analytic work by Chevalier & Clegg (1985) provided a model of the observed X-ray emission produced by the directly thermalized hot plasma in supernova-driven outflows. However, these spatially resolved X-ray observations are limited to nearby galaxies, and are not easy to link to observations of other phases as they likely have different volume-filling fractions and are susceptible to different acceleration mechanisms. In order to produce a complete theoretical picture, simulations must compare to the many down-the-barrel absorption-line measurements used to study the lower-temperature gas in both local and more distant galaxies. This approach also has its challenges, however. Converting these absorption-line measurements into direct physical properties such as mass outflow rates often requires a host of limiting assumptions. Likewise, converting simulated data into directly observed quantities is nontrivial.

Numerical simulations can provide an avenue to better link our theoretical and observational models of outflows. In recent years, much theoretical work has focused specifically on understanding the physics that governs the interaction between a hot, supernova-driven wind and embedded cool clouds of material. In a seminal numerical study, Klein et al. (1994) formulated a characteristic timescale that describes the cloud-shock interaction: the cloud-crushing time tcc. The cloud-crushing time roughly refers to the amount of time that it takes the initial shock to propagate through the cloud. Analyzing 2D adiabatic simulations, Klein et al. (1994) used this timescale to describe the various stages of cloud evolution. The authors concluded that on large scales, spherical clouds in a background wind are destroyed in only a few tcc. Subsequently, the cloud material mixes efficiently at t ≈ 4–5tcc with the surrounding medium via small-scale instabilities.

In subsequent years, different studies have focused on the different physical mechanisms that may affect this interaction, including magnetic fields (Mac Low et al. 1994; Gregori et al. 2000; Li et al. 2013; Banda-Barragán et al. 2016, 2018; Grønnow et al. 2018), radiative cooling (Fragile et al. 2005; Cooper et al. 2009; Scannapieco & Brüggen 2015; Gronke & Oh 2018; Sparre et al. 2019), and thermal conduction (Orlando et al. 2005; Brüggen & Scannapieco 2016; Armillotta et al. 2017). While these numerical works all contributed to our understanding of the cloud–wind interaction, most studies focus on the problem of cloud acceleration and destruction studied either spherical or elliptical clouds (though see Cooper et al. 2009; Schneider & Robertson 2015; Banda-Barragán et al. 2019; Goldsmith & Pittard 2020).

Using extremely high-resolution simulations run with the GPU-based code Cholla, Schneider & Robertson (2015) explored the effects of spatial density distribution on the cloud-shock problem, following the evolution of spherical clouds and of clouds with a lognormal density distribution set by turbulence. That study demonstrated that turbulent clouds are destroyed more quickly than spherical clouds of the same mass and mean density. In a follow-up study, Schneider & Robertson (2017) ran a series of radiative simulations that explored the interaction between a hot (T = 106 K) supernova-driven wind and a cool turbulent cloud representing entrained interstellar material.

Due to the extremely high spatial resolution afforded by Cholla and the realistic way that the turbulent clouds mix, these simulations are ideal for studying the phase structure of gas in outflows. After the initial shock, a wide distribution of densities and temperatures is created as gas in the cloud mixes with gas in the wind. This paper focuses on an analysis of these simulations at a characteristic time representative of an average state for a multiphase galactic wind (see Section 3.1). In particular, we analyze one of these cloud–wind simulations by creating mock absorption lines that can be compared to the plethora of observational data, thereby linking theoretical studies of cloud–wind interactions with observational studies of multiphase galactic outflows.

Section 2 describes the simulation of the interaction between a cool turbulent cloud and the hot wind. In Section 3 the physical properties of gas in the simulation are explored. Mock absorption lines are created for a variety of ionic species, and we compare different methods for deriving values of the optical depth and covering fraction. In Section 4 we compare our results with previous observational and theoretical work. Finally, Section 5 briefly summarizes the paper.

2. The Cloud–Wind Simulation

In order to better understand the interaction between the hot and cool phases in outflows, Schneider & Robertson (2017) ran a high-resolution simulation of a hot flow (with physical parameters modeling a supernova-driven wind) interacting with a cool, dense interstellar medium cloud. Below, we briefly describe the details of the simulation—a more extensive description can be found in the original work.

The simulation was run using Cholla, a GPU-based hydrodynamics code that allows for efficient computation (Schneider & Robertson 2015). The Cholla code uses an HLLC Riemann solver and PPM reconstruction, and for this simulation, optically thin radiative cooling was implemented using precomputed Cloudy tables (Ferland et al. 2013). Cooling rates were calculated assuming solar metallicity for all the gas, and cooling was allowed down to a temperature of T = 10 K. Allowing gas to cool to temperatures below T = 104 K allowed for greater cloud compression and substantially altered the density distribution relative to previous studies. Heating from a metagalactic UV background was also included (Haardt & Madau 2012), although this does not make a practical difference to the thermodynamics for the regime studied. The simulation volume consists of a box with physical dimensions 160 × 40 × 40 pc with 2048 × 512 × 512 cells, yielding a resolution of Δx = 0.07825 pc/cell. The numerical efficiency of Cholla enables this high resolution to be maintained across the entire simulation volume, allowing us to study mixing and cooling and the evolution of the gas through multiple phases and across a large region.

Properties for the background hot wind were set based on the Chevalier & Clegg (1985) spherical adiabatic solution, with an energy input rate $\dot{E}={10}^{42}\ \mathrm{erg}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-1}$, mass input rate $\dot{M}=2{M}_{\odot }\,{\mathrm{yr}}^{-1}$, and driving region size R* = 300 pc, as motivated by the Strickland & Heckman (2009) fit to Chandra X-ray observations of M82. The wind properties were set using the model solution at r = 1 kpc, giving a number density nwind = 5.26 × 10−3 cm−3, temperature T = 3.7 × 106 K, and velocity vwind = 1.1962 × 103 km s−1. Meanwhile, the cool component of the simulation is representative of interstellar material recently entrained in the hot outflow. This cool material is set to be initially at rest and in thermal pressure equilibrium with respect to the background wind. The distribution of interior densities is set to a range of values as imposed by turbulence for Mach ∼5 on the scale of the cloud (Schneider & Robertson 2017). The initial median density of the cloud is $\tilde{n}=0.5\,{\mathrm{cm}}^{-3}$ and the median temperature is Tmed =  3. 98 × 104 K; the initial temperature distribution of the cloud is determined by the density. The cloud has an initial radius Rcl = 5 pc, such that the column density of hydrogen through its center is NH = 1.02 × 1020 cm−2, and the total cloud mass is 8.61 M. The median density and inhomogeneous structure of the cloud influence its overall evolution, including the efficiency of cooling and the time it takes to be destroyed. The cloud has a low enough density that self-gravity can be ignored.

To interpret and compare the results to previous models of cloud–wind interactions, we describe evolution in terms of the cloud-crushing time, tcc (Klein et al. 1994). When the simulation starts, the wind drives a shock through the cloud, which causes the cool material to heat up and accelerate in the wind direction. The cloud-crushing time is an estimate of the time for the internal shock to propagate through the cloud radius and maximally compress it. This timescale can be calculated using the cloud–wind density ratio $\chi =\tfrac{{n}_{\mathrm{cloud}}}{{n}_{\mathrm{wind}}}$, the radius of the cloud Rcloud, and the wind velocity ${v}_{\mathrm{wind}}$,

Equation (1)

For the parameters of our simulation, tcc = 39.8 Kyr. The simulation was run for 1 Myr, equivalent to 25 cloud-crushing times. A real galactic wind would contain many clouds at various stages of evolution (Poludnenko et al. 2002; Alūzas et al. 2012; Banda-Barragán et al. 2020). In this study, this simulation represents one small piece of that interaction.

3. Results

We begin with an overview of the physical properties of the gas throughout the simulation. We then discuss how the gas is split into different temperature ranges to represent different ions, as are often observed in real multiphase winds. Next, we describe how synthetic absorption lines were computed and present profiles for each ion. In calculating the absorption lines, we apply techniques used in observations that use doublets to obtain optical depth and covering fraction. We then compare distributions of optical depth obtained via direct computation from the simulation with those calculated using the empirically derived values (i.e., based on standard observational methods).

3.1. Mass, Velocity, and Temperature Distribution

The cloud in this study reaches maximum compression at tcc = 2 and completely disintegrates by tcc = 20. We use 10tcc for our analysis, as it represents an average state that adequately captures the mixing between the cool and hot gas. Figure 1 shows a simulation snapshot at 10 tcc. The top panel shows the column density projected on the xz plane. The lower panels show slices of the density, velocity, and temperature through the center of the domain.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Mixing between the hot and cool gas is captured at an intermediate state of tcc = 10. Panels show the projected column density as well as slices of density, velocity, and temperature through the xz midplane. The simulation volume is 160 × 40 × 40 pc, and the original radius of the cloud is 5 pc.

Standard image High-resolution image

The cloud material accelerates as momentum is transferred from the hot wind, and enters the outflowing wind with a range of velocities, as can be observed in the velocity slice. The low-density material within the original cloud accelerates much faster than the high-density material, and we see that velocities are anticorrelated with density. The density slice shows that most of the volume is occupied by low-density gas, while the high-density gas is clumped together in small knots, generally seeded by the highest-density regions of the original turbulent cloud. The temperature slice shows that most of the volume is filled with high-temperature gas at approximately T = 106.5 K, the temperature of the shocked hot wind. By contrast, the highest-density regions remain at low temperature, driven by efficient radiative cooling of the highest-density cloud gas. By volume, most of the gas in the simulation has a low density, high velocity, and high temperature, but it should be noted that this is partly driven by our selection of a small initial cloud.

The velocity distributions of the gas in the simulation can be quantified via 1D histograms. The distribution of all the gas in the simulation is shown in Figure 2 in mass-weighted (top) and volume-weighted (bottom) 1D velocity histograms. The upper panel shows clear peaks that differentiate the cool and hot gas phases. For the purposes of this discussion, we define the cool phase using the common threshold of T < 2 × 104 K, and we refer to all other material as part of the hot wind. The ratio of mass in low- to high-velocity components also reflects our choice of initial cloud size relative to the domain. By mass, about 90% of the gas in the simulation is part of the hot wind. At this particular cloud-crushing time of 10 tcc, we find that the total mass of gas at T < 2 × 104 K is approximately 43% of the initial cloud mass, the rest having been heated and mixed into the hot wind earlier in the simulation. The hot wind moves at a high velocity, ∼1000–1250 km s−1. The cooler gas has velocities in the range 30–200 km s−1. This gas is likely comprised of a combination of original cloud mass and material that has been mixed to intermediate temperatures and cooled back down (e.g., Gronke & Oh 2018). The bottom panel in Figure 2 shows the relative contribution of the hot wind and cool cloud to the total volume in the simulation. We can see from this figure that 40% of the gas is unaffected wind material moving at the initial velocity of 1200 km s−1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. 1D mass-weighted (top panel) and volume-weighted (bottom panel) velocity histograms. In the top panel, the left y-axis shows the total mass normalized by the initial cloud mass at the start of the simulation, Mc, 0, and the right axis shows the total mass in the simulation volume (unnormalized). The hot gas travels at high velocities ranging from 1000 to 1250 km s−1 and comprises the majority of the mass and almost all of the volume. The cool cloud material occupies a negligible volume, but contributes approximately 10% of the mass in the domain.

Standard image High-resolution image

As a simple way to map the gas in our simulation to different absorption lines, we follow Figure 6 in Tumlinson et al. (2017), in which temperature ranges for each ion are given based on the full width at half maximum (FWHM) surrounding the temperature associated with the peak abundance of that ionic species from collisional ionization. Table 1 shows the range of temperatures adopted for each species in this study. Assigning ionization states in this way allows us to study the contribution of each ionic species to the total mass and volume throughout the simulation.

In Figure 3 we show mass-weighted 1D velocity histograms for a representative low, medium, and high ion constructed using these temperature ranges. In general, we see similar behavior between low, intermediate, and high ions and find that Si ii, C iv, and O vi are representative of other ions in these ranges. These histograms show that the higher-ionization species contribute less to the total mass in the simulation. Furthermore, we see that the dense gas traced by the low ions has slower average velocities (see Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. The distribution of mass with velocity for gas traced by a low-, intermediate-, and high-temperature ion. The mass decreases for increasing temperature/ionization state, while the range of velocities increases. Panels are normalized by the initial cloud mass, Mc,0.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 2. Velocity Properties of Synthetic Lines

IonsSi ii C ii Si iv C iv N v O vi
vmin (km s−1)8597133133145158
vcentral (km s−1)132144156156168180
v90 (km s−1)228240264264276300

Note. vmin, velocity value corresponding to minimum flux value. vcentral, velocity value corresponding to 50% of the integrated flux. v90, velocity value corresponding to 90% of the integrated flux.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Column density projections are constructed by integrating along the x-axis, which is the direction of the background wind. Conducting our analysis along this axis allows us to compare our results directly to down-the-barrel observations. Adopting the abundances in Table 1, Figure 4 shows maps of the column density for the three representative low, medium, and high ions. In general, O vi tends to be more spatially extended than the low-ionization ions. Still, the three ions trace each other fairly well, indicating that the gas giving rise to them is generally spatially related. This reinforces the idea that the intermediate- and higher-ionization species are primarily being created as a result of the mixing between the cool cloud and the hot wind.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Column density maps projected along the x-axis of representative low-, intermediate-, and high-temperature ions. The dashed white circle represents the original extent of the cloud in the simulation. The higher ions have slightly lower column densities and are slightly more spatially extended.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.2. Absorption-line Profiles

We study absorption-line profiles of six ions that probe different temperatures. As demonstrated by the temperature slice in Figure 1, gas in the simulation has a range of temperatures from 10 to 107 K. We create mock absorption-line profiles using the optical depth of each ionic species, which reflects both total column densities in each map pixel (e.g., Figure 4) and the line-of-sight velocity distribution. The optical depth is computed adopting the Sobolev approximation, which gives τ in terms of the density and radial velocity gradient as

Equation (2)

Here, the line-of-sight velocity gradient is taken to be in the direction of the background wind (x in the simulation). The oscillator strength (f) and rest-wavelength (λ0) of each of the six species investigated in this study can be found in Table 1. By integrating the number densities along the x-axis in bins of velocity, we can directly compute the optical depth along each line of sight, giving ny  × nz  = 262,144 independent sightlines through the simulation box. We use these to calculate the total flux decrements as a function of velocity for each species through the box; we also use the spatial distribution to assess covering fractions.

The normalized observed flux F(v) is defined as

Equation (3)

where S is the background source brightness (a stellar continuum) and where the average is over the yz projection of the simulation box. In the limit of low optical depth,

Equation (4)

from the definition of Equation (2), this involves spatial integration over the whole box. The flux decrement is then proportional to M(v), the distribution of mass as a function of velocity traced by the ion. We do not explicitly model the source brightness in our analysis, but rather use Equation (4) to calculate the flux decrement along each line of sight, which is equivalent to assuming that the source brightness is constant across the yz extent of the simulation.

Figure 5 shows the normalized flux as a function of velocity for the six ions in Table 1. Typically, down-the-barrel studies do not spatially resolve individual regions of galaxies, and thus the absorption is a result of the integrated continuum and absorption across the entire central starburst region of a galaxy. For our normalized fluxes, the averaging is done over the entire box, so the size and mass of the cloud relative to the simulation box determines how much flux we observe. The larger the simulation box, the more unobstructed sightlines there are in the average, leading to shallower absorption lines. The bigger the clouds and the higher the column density, the more high τ sightlines enter the average, and the smaller the directly computed flux.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Normalized synthetic absorption-line profiles for commonly observed low, intermediate, and high ions. Table 2 lists the variation of vmin, vcentral, and v90 for each of the lines shown here.

Standard image High-resolution image

Three commonly measured features of absorption lines in winds are their minimum, central, and 90th percentile velocities. Table 2 lists these velocity statistics for each of the six ionic species in Table 1 using the absorption-line profiles shown in Figure 5, which were calculated using the strong lines. We define vmin as the velocity value corresponding to the minimum flux in the absorption line. vcentral is a similar measurement, but is computed by first integrating the flux profiles (see Figure 5) from 0 to 1200 km s−1 and identifying the velocity at which we reach 50% of the area under the curve. Differences between vmin and vcentral give some idea as to the non-Gaussian skew of the absorption line—vcentral is higher than vmin for all of the lines, reflecting the extended high-velocity tails. v90 is computed similarly to vcentral, with the exception that it identifies the velocity that corresponds to 90% of the area under the curve, giving a rough measure of the maximum (observable) velocity of the gas in the wind. From Table 2 we can see an increase in all three velocity statistics as we go from low-ionization ions (Si ii and C ii) to high-ionization ions (N v and O vi).

3.3. Empirical Covering Fraction and Optical Depth

The depth of an absorption line depends on both the optical depth τ and the covering fraction Cf of the absorbing gas. The covering fraction accounts for the fraction of the background light source that is obscured by the absorbing gas, while the optical depth measures the total amount of absorption in a given sight line as light passes through the cloud. For example, in Figure 5, the shape of the absorption lines is primarily determined by differences in τ as a function of velocity, while the overall normalization is set by the yz spatial extent of our cloud (see Figure 4). If the lines are optically thin, the absorption profiles are essentially rescaled inverted profiles M(v), examples of which are shown in Figure 3. When τ > 3, we define the line profile as optically thick, at which point the depth of the observed line will be set exclusively by Cf .

When the line profiles are optically thin, the depth of the line profiles becomes degenerate with Cf and τ. One observational technique to break this degeneracy and separately compute the optical depth and covering fraction takes advantage of doublets of the same ionic species. For example, Figure 6 shows strong and weak absorption lines for O vi. The strong line for O vi has a greater oscillator strength, f, and wavelength coefficients than the weak line. For doublets that have an f-value ratio equal to 2, the relationship between τs and τw becomes τs (v) = 2τw (v). This unique ratio allows one to algebraically solve for the covering fraction independently of τ. In order to facilitate a comparison of our results with observations, we now present "empirical" estimates for the optical depth and covering fraction, derived according to this method. In all future discussion, "direct" will refer to the values calculated in Section 3.2, and "empirical" refers to values calculated using the following observational methodology.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Strong and weak absorption lines for the O vi doublet. Although the strong and weak line peak at the same vmin, the strong line has a larger τ and deeper absorption.

Standard image High-resolution image

Following Chisholm et al. (2018), empirical equations were derived for the optical depth and covering fraction of each ionic species. From Equation (3), if we consider a fraction Cf (v) of the area as covered by a cloud with optical depth τ(v), and the remaining fraction 1 − Cf (v) as uncovered, the normalized flux would be

Equation (5)

If τ(v) for a weak and strong line is related by fraction 2, the expression for the weak and strong line can be combined to solve for the covering fraction and the optical depth as a function of the flux in each line, assuming each line has the same Cf . The result is

Equation (6)

and

Equation (7)

where Fw represents the flux from the weak line, Fs is the flux of the strong line, and τw,emp is the empirical optical depth of the weak line.

We can use our directly computed flux for the strong and weak lines and for Equation (6) to calculate an empirical estimate of the covering fraction of each species. In Figure 7 we show this empirically calculated covering fraction and compare it to the directly calculated covering fraction, computed by summing all the lines of sight with τ > 0.1 and normalizing by the total number, ny  × nz  = 262,144 lines of sight along the x-direction. There is excellent agreement at all velocities for the low ions, and the modes of the distributions for the direct and empirical method are quite similar for all lines. However, the empirically calculated covering fractions tend to be slightly lower (up to ∼40% difference) than the directly computed values for intermediate- and high-temperature ions.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. A comparison between the empirically derived and direct computation of the covering fraction for strong absorption lines. The empirical and direct method covering fraction calculations agree for low-ionization ions, but for the intermediate and high ions, the empirical method finds lower values for the covering fraction than the direct method calculation.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 8 shows the empirically calculated optical depth, τw,emp, for the six different ions that were used for this study. The low ions, Si ii and C ii, have very similar optical depths. Si ii peaks at τw,emp = 3.98 and C ii peaks at τw,emp = 3.41; both of these ions also have the same peak velocity of 48 km s−1. This similarity is of course primarily driven by the similar temperature ranges assigned to each ion and by their similar mass fractions under the assumption of solar relative abundances. From this figure, we also see that the velocity range of the low ions is larger than would be captured by a measurement of v90. That is, while most of the mass in these low ions is at low velocity, there is a tail of high-velocity gas even at relatively cool temperatures. The intermediate and higher ions tend to have broader velocity ranges on the whole and are optically thin across the entire range.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. The empirical optical depth of the weak line of six commonly used ionic species is shown. The lower ions tend to have higher optical depths and peak at lower velocities.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 9 shows a comparison between the empirical and direct calculations of the optical depth for the strong lines. For the direct method, the dashed lines show the median value of τ, the bottom of the shaded region shows the 25th percentile, and the upper boundary represents the 75th percentile. The empirically calculated values are shown as solid lines. Examining the two upper left panels, we see that low ions tracing low-temperature gas tend to have τs,emp(v) values that underestimate the directly calculated value of τ. Conversely, in the panels that show our medium and high ions, the value of τs,emp(v) consistently overestimates τ. Equation (7) can be used to quantitatively explain the cases when the empirically derived values under- or overestimate τ, as follows.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. An optical depth (τ) comparison of six commonly used species that vary by temperature. The dashed line in each of the panels represents the median value of directly calculated τ. The shaded region represents the 25th and 75th percentile of the directly computed τ values for all sightlines. The solid colored lines represent the empirically calculated optical depth τs,emp for the strong lines.

Standard image High-resolution image

First, we rewrite Equation (7) in terms of the average flux deficit,

Equation (8)

This equation can now be used to describe the two different behaviors of ${\tau }_{0}(v)$. We define two regimes of τemp as τlow and τhigh, such that $\langle {e}^{-{\tau }_{\mathrm{emp}}}\rangle \sim ({e}^{-{\tau }_{\mathrm{low}}}+{e}^{-{\tau }_{\mathrm{high}}})/2$. These values are an arbitrary representation of the lower and upper 50th percentile of τ0. In the optically thick case where τhigh and τlow $\gg \,1$,

Equation (9)

In the opposite, optically thin regime where τhigh and τlow $\ll \,1$,

Equation (10)

Equations (9) and (10) can now be used to interpret Figure 9. Equation (9) shows that when the optical depth is large, τemp(v) tends to lie near the lower range of τ. Equation (10) shows that when the optical depth is small, τemp(v) tends to lie near the upper range of τ. Figure 9 shows that for the low ions such as Si ii and C ii that have direct values of τ > 1, τemp indeed underestimates the true value of τ (shown by Equation (9)). Conversely, for intermediate and high-ionization ions such as Si iv, C iv, N v, and O vi, which are optically thin, τemp overestimates τ.

4. Discussion

Developing a complete picture of galactic outflows requires a collaborative effort between theorists and observers. In order to interpret the results of numerical models in the context of observed systems, their properties must be translated into physical characteristics that can be observed directly, as demonstrated in Section 3. Before embarking on a comparison, however, we should note that the results of our numerical models depend critically on assumptions made about the physical properties of the gas in the simulation. In particular, the predetermined cloud and wind properties will affect the resulting absorption-line profiles, covering fractions, etc. The range of cool gas velocities we see in the simulation depends on the initial velocity that is assigned to the hot wind, and potentially its density as well. Similarly, the optical depths and covering fractions values that are found in this study depend on the physical properties assigned to the cloud. Had we chosen a larger cloud or added multiple clouds along the line of sight, for example, the covering fraction and optical depth values would be larger. Similarly, turbulent clouds were chosen for this work rather than constant-density spheres because they represent a more realistic internal density distribution. This leads to a larger fraction of the cloud gas being associated with intermediate-temperature states than would be true for the same cloud–wind interaction using a constant-density sphere. Furthermore, the comparison between our results and those from previous work are likely to differ due to different techniques and assumptions that are made. Of particular note is our assumption that all gas in the wind is in collisional ionization equilibrium. While this is a good starting point, it is likely that cool photoionized gas also contributes to the intermediate ions. This is an avenue we intend to investigate in future work.

4.1. Observational Comparison

The ubiquity of outflows and advancements in telescopes and instrumentation in recent years have made it possible to study this multiphase phenomenon with increasingly large samples of objects and with increasingly detailed spectroscopic coverage. Absorption-line spectra, in particular, have been used to establish an understanding of the kinematics of galactic outflows as a function of different ionic species. In this section, we compare our simulated absorption spectra and kinematics to several representative observational studies. Average characteristics of the galaxies in each study can be found in Table 3.

Table 3. Characteristics of Galaxy Samples from the Literature

ReferenceAbsorption LinesSample Size z SFR (M yr−1)
Heckman et al. (2000)Na i D32<0.110–100
Rupke et al. (2002)Na i D110.02–0.27172–612
Rupke et al. (2005a, 2005b)Na i D780.031, 0.129, 0.36040, 225, 389
Weiner et al. (2009)Mg ii 1406 (stack)1.410–50
Rubin et al. (2010)Mg ii, Fe ii 468 (stack)0.7–1.51–30
Rubin et al. (2014)Mg ii, Fe ii 1050.3–1.40.1–117
Heckman et al. (2015)Si iiiv, Fe ii, O i, Al ii 19 of 39 (stack)<0.20.016–66
Chisholm et al. (2017)Si iv 7∼00.02–26
Chisholm et al. (2018)S iiv, Fe ii, Al iiiii, C ii, C iv, N v, O i, O vi 12.9<48 a

Note.

a Wuyts et al. (2012).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

We begin our comparison with studies that focused on the Na i "D" absorption line (Heckman et al. 2000; Rupke et al. 2002, 2005a, 2005b), which was used to study the warm neutral gas phase in starburst-dominated ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) and infrared galaxies (IRGs). Although we do not attempt to reproduce Na i "D" because of its sensitive dependence on the dust properties of the outflow, these studies are nevertheless a good example of early studies with large samples of objects displaying blueshifted absorption.

Heckman et al. (2000) investigated 32 far-IR-bright starburst galaxies drawn from parent samples in previous studies (Armus et al. 1989; Lehnert & Heckman 1995). The authors found that the absorption-line profiles of Na i D in these outflow sources exhibit high maximum velocities that range from 400 to 600 km s−1. In comparison to our lowest-energy ions, we find that our maximum velocities for Si ii of 400 km s−1 and for C ii of 448 km s−1 are within the range of velocities computed in their study, although our v90 values tend to be significantly lower.

Using the Echellette Spectrograph and Imager (ESI) instrument on Keck II, Rupke et al. (2002) studied 11 ULIRG from the IRAS 1 Jy survey that have visible Na i D absorption. The authors measured a "typical" outflow speed of 300 km s−1, which is consistent with our low ion values for v90, but significantly higher than our values for vcentral. Rupke et al. (2005a, 2005b) studied 78 ULIRGs and IR galaxies at z < 0.5. Because of the large sample size, the authors were able to study the evolution of winds as a function of host galaxy properties. The sample was split into three different categories: IRGs (z < 0.5), low-z ULIRGs (z < 0.25), and high-z ULIRGs (0.25 < z < 0.50). ULIRGs (LIR > 1012 L) are host to starbursts and power star formation with the large amount of dense molecular gas found in their cores. By contrast, IRGs (1010 L < LIR < 1012 L) host fewer starbursts and have a lower wind detection rate than ULIRGs (Heckman et al. 2000; Rupke et al. 2002; Martin 2005). Each of the three samples were selected from three different surveys; the IRGs from the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (RBGS) and Warm Galaxy Sample (WGS), the low-z ULIRGs from the IRAS 1 Jy survey, and the high-z ULIRGs from the FIRST/FSC survey. We compare our maximum velocities for Si ii and C ii with the average maximum velocities for the three samples, which are 308, 401, and 359 km s−1 for IRGs, low-z ULIRGs, and high-z ULIRGs, respectively. Our maximum velocity for Si ii (400 km s−1) closely matches that of the low-z ULIRGs, while our maximum velocity for C ii (448 km s−1) exceeds the average maximum velocity computed in this study for all three samples.

Starting with stacks of galaxies at intermediate redshift and later individual galaxies at lower redshifts, Weiner et al. (2009), Rubin et al. (2010, 2014), and Heckman et al. (2015) used starburst galaxies to study UV absorption lines of the warm ionized gas (104–105 K) in outflows. Weiner et al. (2009) studied Mg ii absorption in the stacked spectra of 1406 starburst galaxies at z ∼ 1.4 from the DEEP2 redshift survey. With an ionization potential of 15.0 eV, Mg ii does not photodissociate as easily as Na i D, which leads to smaller ionization corrections. This study found central outflow velocities that range from 250 to 300 km s−1. Our vcentral for Si ii, C ii, Si iv, and C iv are 132, 144, 156, 156 km s−1, respectively, which are consistently lower than the velocities found in this study. In a similar study, Rubin et al. (2010) investigated Mg ii and Fe ii absorption in the stacked spectra of 468 galaxies from the Team Keck Treasury Redshift Survey (TKRS) at slightly lower redshift. The authors found central velocity offsets of ∼250 km s−1 for Fe ii and Mg ii, with slightly larger offsets for Mg than for Fe. These values are again slightly higher than our vcentral values for the low ions.

Rubin et al. (2014) used redshift surveys of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) fields and the Extended Groth Strip (EGS) to analyze the individual spectra of 105 galaxies using the Mg ii (λ2796 and λ2803) and Fe ii (λ2586 and λ2600) doublet absorption-line profiles at 0.3 < z < 1.4. Two distinct models were used in this study in order to quantify the kinematics and strength of each line profile. The "one-component" model follows the same approach as Rupke et al. (2005b) and parameterizes the normalized flux as a function of wavelength. The "two-component" model assumes that the same line profile comes from two velocities as opposed to one. We compare our vcentral with the two-component model, for which most of the calculated vcentral values are <150 km s−1, and find that our values for Si ii, C ii, Si iv, and C iv of 132, 144, 156, 156 km s−1, respectively, are within the range of velocity values calculated in this study.

Heckman et al. (2015) studied the kinematics of the warm gas phase found in supernova-driven winds of 39 low-redshift (z < 0.2) objects using UV absorption lines. This study used two samples of galaxies: the stacked spectra of 19 galaxies observed with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer satellite (FUSE), and the individual spectra of 21 Lyman Break Analogs (LBAs) observed with COS on HST. We compare our absorption-line profiles of Si ii, C ii, and Si iv with those computed in this study and find that our vmin values of 84, 96, 133 km s−1 are systematically lower than those found in this study. The vmin values that Heckman et al. (2015) find for the same species (Si ii, C ii, and Si iv) are 200, 150, and 300 km s−1, respectively.

Using COS spectra, Chisholm et al. (2017) investigated seven starburst galaxies using UV absorption lines. Using the Si iv doublet, they derive and solve a system of two equations for the velocity-resolved optical depth and covering fraction, as described in Section 3. We compare our optical depth and covering fraction results for Si iv to those from this study. The peak τ values for Si iv in this study range from τ ∼ 0.5–2.7, comparable to our τemp value for Si iv, which peaks at 0.75. A notable difference between our work and this study is the assumption in Chisholm et al. (2017) that the Si iv absorption is produced exclusively by cool photoionized gas, while we assume that it is produced exclusively by warm collisionally ionized gas. Our covering fractions are of course much smaller than those computed in this study due to the small area of the cloud in our simulation.

In a particularly instructive single-object study, Chisholm et al. (2018) used data from the Magellan Evolution of Galaxies Spectro-scopic and Ultraviolet Reference Atlas (MEGaSaURA) to study O vi 1032 Å absorption from a gravitationally lensed high-redshift galaxy (z ∼ 2.9) with a star formation rate of >48 M yr−1 as measured by spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting. O vi in winds likely probes gas transitioning between a warm 104 K gas and a hot <107 K, allowing the kinematics of distinct gas phases to be studied. This study examined absorption-line profiles of many lower ions (see Table 3) and compared them to O vi, finding two "regimes" for the O vi line—at low velocities, its profile resembles that of the optically thick low ions, while at high velocities, its profile resembles that of the optically thin lines. In general, we find that the optical depth of our lines is smaller than those shown in their work. This is partly due to the fact that the depth of our normalized flux is affected by the size of our simulation and the size of our cloud. When calculating our flux, we average over the entire simulation box, so there are many unobstructed sightlines in our average, leading to shallow absorption lines. However, we can more fairly compare the quantities vcentral and v90 from the studied metal absorption lines. In contrast to the previous studies mentioned, when comparing our computed velocity values to the derived quantities from Chisholm et al. (2018), we find that our values do not match the observations well. In this study, the central velocities for the strong lines of Si ii, C iv, and O vi are 201, 130, and 246 km s−1, while our values are systematically lower, at 132, 156, and 180 km s−1, respectively. Our v90 values for the same three species (228, 264, and 300 km s−1) also underpredict those seen in this object—Chisholm et al. (2018) find values corresponding to these same species of 585, 455, and 532 km s−1.

Generally speaking, our lowest-ionization state gas appears to match the kinematics of the low-z observed absorption-line systems better than the high-z systems. Our numerical study is based on the canonical low-z starburst galaxy M82 and assumes a lower star formation rate (and thus less extreme hot wind properties) than many of the high-z systems discussed here, which may account for the better match to the systems observed a lower redshift. On the other hand, our higher-ionization lines consistently underpredict the observed values for all studies. In particular, our higher-ionization lines tend to have lower central and maximum velocities than those that are observed.

There are two possible reasons for this. First, the maximum velocities we observe in these simulations do increase slightly with time. That is, analysis of a later snapshot in the simulation would yield velocity profiles with slightly higher maximum velocities. So it is possible that the cloud gas at this point simply has not had enough time to be accelerated to the maximum velocities observed. However, even at the latest times in these simulations, when the cloud gas has mostly been destroyed, the maximum velocities do not reach the highest values of the observed velocities. In a number of recent studies, several authors have demonstrated that additional momentum can be transferred to gas in the warm photoionized phase and intermediate hotter phases via mixing with the hot wind, and that the amount of momentum transferred is a function of the amount of mixing that has occurred, and thus the distance that the gas has traveled (e.g., Fielding et al. 2018; Gronke & Oh 2018, 1970; Schneider et al. 2020; Vijayan et al. 2020). Because the simulation used in this study consisted of a small (5 pc) cloud in a relatively small (160 pc) box, there is simply not enough room for the higher-ionization state gas to have achieved the velocities commonly observed. In larger-scale simulations, this gas experiences further acceleration, and the higher-ionization state profiles may be a better fit (Schneider et al. 2020). This is an avenue we will explore in future work.

4.2. Simulations

In addition to the many observational studies, the past several years have seen a substantial effort on the theoretical side to better understand the physics of outflows through the use numerical simulations (e.g., Cooper et al. 2009; Scannapieco & Brüggen 2015; Brüggen & Scannapieco 2016; Schneider & Robertson 2017; Cottle et al. 2018; Fielding et al. 2018; Gronke & Oh 2018; Kim & Ostriker 2018; Kim et al. 2020). Most of these studies did not include absorption spectra, and we therefore do not compare the results here, but we can compare to Cottle et al. (2018), who included a thorough examination of blueshifted absorption from an idealized wind simulation very similar to that presented in this work.

Cottle et al. (2018) used adaptive mesh refinement 3D hydrodynamic simulations from Scannapieco & Brüggen (2015) and Brüggen & Scannapieco (2016) to study a cool cloud in a hot wind. These simulations included the effects of radiative cooling, thermal conduction, and an ionizing background characteristic of a starburst galaxy in varying combinations. The authors used the TRIDENT code (Hummels et al. 2017) to produce synthetic column densities of 10 different species from the simulations: H i, Mg ii, C ii, C iii, C iv, Si iii, Si iv, N v, O vi, and Ne viii. The physical volume of the simulation box hosting the interaction between these two phases is −800 × 800 pc along the xy direction and −400 × 800 pc along the z direction, which is the direction of the hot wind. The simulations used a cloud with an initial temperature of T = 104 K, radius of Rcloud = 100 pc, and a mass density of ρ = 10−24 g cm−3 (substantially larger than the cloud in this work), and allowed cooling down to 104 K. The study included results at four characteristic times in the cloud destruction that correspond to when 95%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of the mass fraction of the cloud remains at or above one-third of the clouds original density. Here we compare our results to their t50, which is most similar to our 10 tcc snapshots.

We compare our column densities of C iv and O vi to those computed in this study and find that similar to our findings, O vi tends to be more spatially extended than the lower ions. As in our simulation, the column density profiles of all the ions in Cottle et al. (2018) trace each other fairly well, indicating that the species are spatially related and have a similar creation mechanism. Comparing this to our normalized flux results, we find similar results only for N v—all other ions in our study have much smaller depths than theirs, and their lowest-ionization states are completely saturated. This can primarily be attributed to the much larger cloud used by Cottle et al. (2018), which leads to larger column densities, optical depths, and covering fractions. When comparing our velocities with those in this study, we see that for both our model and Cottle et al. (2018), the velocities increase with ionization state. This stands in contrast to the velocities shown in Chisholm et al. (2018), Table 1, where there is not a clear correlation of increasing ionization states and velocities. Additionally, we compare our covering fraction results to those from this study and find that our values are smaller than those presented in this study. Although the shapes of our velocity profiles differ from those presented in Cottle et al. (2018), we do find similar vmin values—our velocities all fall within their peak range of ∼50–200 km s−1 for the various ions.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we have presented a study of the gas in multiphase outflows using a high-resolution numerical simulation that models the interaction between a hot supernovae-driven wind and a cool cloud of interstellar material (Schneider & Robertson 2017). Using this simulated data set, we have created observables that we compare to observational studies of outflows in order to better understand the kinematics and phase structure of the gas. Gas in the simulation has a wide range of temperatures, densities, and velocities. By assigning ionization states to the gas using collisionally ionized gas temperatures, we enable a direct comparison to the individual species observed in absorption-line studies of outflows.

In particular, we create synthetic absorption lines for a sample of representative ions, which are then used to calculate the optical depth and covering fraction of individual species. These absorption lines are characterized by a few general features: as the ionization state increases, so do the velocity centroids and maximum values (see Table 2). Optical depths are higher for the lower ions, and covering fractions are lower, although marginally. All of our covering fractions are very low compared to the observations, which is a result of our small cloud size compared to the simulation domain. Consequently, the absorption as shown by the normalized fluxes presented in this work is very shallow relative to the observed lines. We therefore focus primarily on the shapes of the velocity profiles and associated statistics.

Motivated by Chisholm et al. (2018), we also derived an "empirical" optical depth and covering fraction using doublets from the same ionic species. We compared these values with the directly computed optical depth and covering fraction values obtained using the simulation. Figure 7 shows that our direct covering fraction calculations resemble the profiles of the empirically derived low-ionization ions such as Si ii and C ii; we find that for highly ionized species such as NV and O vi, the empirical values tend to underestimate the directly computed values by about ∼40%. Figure 9 shows that the empirically derived optical depth for optically thick low-ionization ions such as Si ii and C ii tends to underestimate the true values of τ. Conversely, the empirical optical depth values for the intermediate and high ions overestimates the true value of τ. It is nevertheless true that the "empirical" optical depth is still between the 25th and 75th percentile of the optical depth distribution for most ions. We demonstrate that biases in optical depth estimates can be understood based on whether the absorption lines are optically thick or optically thin (see Equations (9) and (10)).

In Section 4 we compare our results with an extensive sample of observational studies from the literature that investigate line profiles of species with similar ionization states (e.g., Na i D, Mg ii, and Fe ii). We find that our maximum velocity for Si ii and C ii resembles the velocities reached by Na i D. Similarly, our central velocities for Si ii, C ii, Si iv, and C iv are within the typical velocity ranges of most UV absorption-line studies, particularly for lower star formation rate systems more comparable to our assumed wind. Our higher-ionization lines undershoot the maximum velocities reported in most systems, which is a result of our small simulation box size and limited physical range for acceleration.

This study is an first step toward more detailed comparisons of simulated and observed absorption-line data. In future work, we hope to expand the results of this work to larger simulations and improve the physical accuracy of the simulated absorption lines through full radiative-transfer modeling. Nevertheless, we anticipate that the results presented here will provide additional insight into the nature of the multiphase gas in galactic outflows and how it gives rise to the observed fluxes. These comparisons between simulated data and observations will ultimately help improve both our theoretical models and our ability to interpret the kinematics of galactic outflows.

We are grateful to the referee for careful reading of our manuscript and a very detailed and helpful report. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, via an award of computing time on the Titan system provided by the INCITE program (AST125). E.E.S was supported in part by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant #HF-51397.001-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555. The work of E.C.O. was partly supported by grant 510940 from the Simons Foundation.

Software: Cholla (Schneider & Robertson 2015); matplotlib (Hunter 2007), numpy (van der Walt et al. 2011), hdf5 (The HDF Group 1997–2021).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/ac04ac