Abstract
Some theorists have suggested that the cognitive processes determining a person’s perforance in a given task are unconscious, making introspection a poor research tool for studying these processes. Others have argued that the relevant processes usually are consciously conrolled and can be detailed by asking the person to introspect. Here, a synthesis of these two positions, a dual-factor approach, is proposed. Some of the processes involved in achieving a cognitive goal, such as learning a new concept, are viewed as unconscious and automatic; howver, other processes are intentionally allocated conscious attention, in certain tasks, to accomlish othe goal. To illustrate this dual-factor position, evidence is presented in support of the view that when concept learning occurs solely by automatic frequency processing, introspective reports are inaccurate, but when the nature of the task prompts intentional hypothesis testing, introspective reports are accurate, revealing clues that subjects engage in a conscious hypothesisesting strategy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., & Beasley, C. M.A general learning theory and its application to schema abstraction (Tech. Rep. 78–2) University of Pittsburgh, Office of Naval Research, 1978.
Bourne, L. E., Jr., Robbins, D. W., & Kellogg, R. T.Recogition failure for hypotheses in concept learning. Manuscript subitted for publication, 1981.
Elio, R., & Anderson, J. R.The effect of information repreentativeness and order of acquisition on schema formation. Paper resented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, 1980.
References
Bourne, L. E., Jr.,Ekstrand, B. R., Lovallo, W. R., Kellogg, R. T., Hiew, C. C., &Yaroush, R. A. Frequency analysis of attribute identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976,105, 294–312.
Chumbley, J. I., Sala, L. S., &Bourne, L. E., Jr. Bases of acceptability ratings in quasinaturalistic concept tasks.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 217–226.
Ericsson, K. A., &Simon, H. A. Verbal reports as data.Psychological Review, 1980,87, 215–251.
Goldman, D., &Homa, D. Integrative and metric properties of abstracted information as a function of category discriminability, instance variability, and experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 375–385.
Hasher, L., &Chromiak, W. The processing of frequency information: An automatic mechanism?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 173–184.
Kellogg, R. T. Feature frequency and hypothesis testing in the acquisition of rule-governed concepts.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 297–303. (a)
Kellogg, R. T. Is conscious attention necessary for long-term storage?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 379–390. (b)
Kellogg, R. T. Feature frequency in concept learning: What is counted?Memory & Cognition, 1981,9, 157–163.
Kellogg, R. T., Robbins, D. W., Bourne, L. E., Jr. Memory for intratrial events in feature identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 256–265.
Kintsch, W.Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. New York: Wiley, 1970.
Levine, M.A cognitive theory of learning. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Mandler, G. Consciousness: Respectable, useful, and probably necessary. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 231–259.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Reber, A. S., Kassin, S. M., Lewis, S., &Cantor, G. On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 492–502.
Shevrin, H., &Dickman, S. The psychological unconscious: A necessary assumption for all psychological theory?American Psychologist, 1980,35, 421–434.
Hifprin, R. M., &Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 127–190. (den day)
Wilson, T. D., Hull, J. G., &Johnson, J. Awareness and selfperception: Verbal reports on internal states.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981,43, 53–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by a special grant to the author from the University of Missouri.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kellogg, R.T. When can we introspect accurately about mental processes?. Memory & Cognition 10, 141–144 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209215
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209215