Abstract
Effects of the similarity between target and distractors in a visual search task were investigated in several experiments. Both familiar (numerals and letters) and unfamiliar (connected figures in a 5 × 5 matrix) stimuli were used. The observer had to report on the presence or absence of a target among a variable number of homogeneous distractors as fast and as accurately as possible. It was found that physical difference had the same clear effect on processing time far familiar and for unfamiliar stimuli: processing time decreased monotonically with increasing physical difference. Distractors unrelated to the target and those related to the target by a simple transformation (180° rotation, horizontal or vertical reflection) were also compared, while the physical difference was kept constant. For familiar stimuli, transformational relatedness increased processing time in comparison with that fort unrelated stimulus pairs. It was further shown in a scaling experiment that this effect could be accounted for by the amount of perceived similarity of the target-distractor pairs. For unfamiliar stimuli, transformational relatedness did have a smaller and less pronounced effect. Various comparable unrelated distractors resulted in a full range of processing times. Results from a similarity scaling experiment correlated well with the outcome of the experiments with unfamiliar stimuli. These results are interpreted in terms of an underlying continuum of perceived similarity as the basis of the speed of visual search, rather than a dichotomy of parallel versus serial processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beck, J. (1966). Effect of onentadon and of shape similarity on perceptual groupingPerception & Psychophysics,1, 300–302
Beck, J. (1982) Textural segmentation. In J. Beck (Ed.),Organitation and representation in perception (pp, 285–317. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Dehaene, S (1989) Discriminability and dimensionality effects in visual search for featural conjunctions A functional pop-out.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 72–80.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarityPsychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H., &Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search Further evidence from sabadditive effects of visual qualityJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 551–560.
Enns, J. T., Ochs, E. P. &Rensink, R. A. (1990). VSearch. Macintosh software for experiments in visual search.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 118–122
Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables m visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics.12, 278–286.
Farmer, E. W., Taylor, R. M. (1980) Visual search through color displays Effects of target-background similarity ate background uniformityPerception & Psychophysics,27, 267–272.
Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric methods. New York McGraw-Hill.
Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327
Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., &Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes m visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targetsJournal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 258–279.
Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schema.Psychometrica,32, 241–254
Julesz, B. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theoryTrends in Neuroscience.7, 41–45.
Julesz, B. (1986). Texton gradients: The texton theory revisited.Biological Cybernetics,54, 245–261.
McIntyre, C., Fox, R, &Neale, J. (1970). Effects of noise similarity and redundancy on the information processed from beef visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 328–332.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nickerson, R. S. (1967). Categorization time with categories defined by disjunction and conjunction of stimulus attributes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,73, 211–219
Nothdurft, H -C. (1985). Sensitivity for structure gradient in teature discrimination tasksVision Research,25, 1957–1968.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1990). Texture segmentation is based on local dissimilaritiesInvestigative Ophthalmology & Vassal Science,31 (Suppl), 561.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1991). The role of local contrast in pop-out of orientation, motion and color.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,32 (Suppl.), 714.
Pashler, H, (1987). Target-distractor discriminabdity in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 285–292
Podgorny, P. &Garner, W. R. (1979) Reaction amt as a measure of inter- and intraobject visual similarity Letters of the alphabet,Perception & Psychophysics,26, 31–52.
Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., &Stoever, R. G. (1977) Perception of wholes and then component parts. Some configurational superiority effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 422–435
Prinzmetal, W &Bunks, W. P. (1977). Good continuation affects visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 389–395
Quinlan, P. T, &Humphreys, G. W. (1987) Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size. An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 455–472.
Singer, M. H., &Lappin, J. S. (1975). Similarity Its definition and effect at the drool analysis of complex displaysPerception & Psychophysics,19, 405–411
Taylor, D. A. (1974) Holistic and analytic processes in the comport son of letters.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 187–190
Treisman, A (1986. November). Features and objects in visual processing Scientific American. pp 114B- 125.
Treisman, A (1988). Features and objects: The 40th Bonito Memoreal Lecture QuantifyJournal of Experimental Psychology,40A. 201–237
Treisman, A. (1991) Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensionsJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,17, 652–676.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A., &Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention and object perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,10, 12–31
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Van Nes, F. L., &Bouma, H. (1980). On the legibility of segmented numeralsHuman Factors,22, 463–474.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Wolfe, J. M., &Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992). On the role of symmetry in visual search.Psychological Science.3, 194–198
Woodworth, R. S. (1938).Experimental psychology New York: Holt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Canadian NSERC Operating Grant A-53 to M.v.G. Travel assistance was received by M.v.G. from CCint-USP (Brazil)
—Accepted be previous editor. Charles W. Enksen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
von Grunau, M., Dubé, S. & Galera, C. Local and global factors of similarity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 55, 575–592 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205314
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205314