Abstract
This study investigated serial recall by congenitally, profoundly deaf signers for visually specified linguistic information presented in their primary language, American Sign Language (ASL), and in printed or fingerspelled English. There were three main findings. First, differences in the serial-position curves across these conditions distinguished the changing-state stimuli from the static stimuli. These differences were a recency advantage and a primacy disadvantage for the ASL signs and fingerspelled English words, relative to the printed English words. Second, the deaf subjects, who were college students and graduates, used a sign-based code to recall ASL signs, but not to recall English words; this result suggests that well-educated deaf signers do not translate into their primary language when the information to be recalled is in English. Finally, mean recall of the deaf subjects for ordered lists of ASL signs and fingerspelled and printed English words was significantly less than that of hearing control subjects for the printed words; this difference may be explained by the particular efficacy of a speech-based code used by hearing individuals for retention of ordered linguistic information and by the relatively limited speech experience of congenitally, profoundly deaf individuals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Working memory and reading. In P. A. Kolers, M. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language. (Vol. l, pp. 355–370). New York: Dienem.
Battison, R. (1978).Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Bellugi, U. (1980). Clues from the similarity between signed and spoken language, In. U. Bellugi & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.),Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form (pp. 115–140). Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
Bellugi, U., Klima, E. S., &Siple, P. (1975). Remembering in signs.Cognition,3, 93–125.
Bellugi, U., &Siple, P. (1974) Remembering with and wtthout words. In F. Bresson (Ed.),Current problems in psycholinguistics (pp. 215–235). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Belmont, J. M., &Karchmer, M. A. (1978). Deaf people’s memory: There are problems testing special populations. In M. Gruneberg & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 581–588). London: Academic Press.
Belmont, J. M., Karchmer, M. A., &Pilkonis, P. A. (1976). Instructed rehearsal strategies’ influence on deaf memory processing.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,19, 36–47.
Bornstein, H., &Roy, H. L. (1973). Comment on “Lmgnistic deficiency and thinking: Research with deaf subjects 1964-1969.”Psychological Bulletin,79, 211–214.
Campbell, R., &Dodd, B. (1980). Hearing by eye.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 85–99.
Campbell, R., Dood, B., &Brasher, J. (1983). The sources of visual recency: Movement and language in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 571–587.
Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory.British Journal of Psychology,55, 75–84.
Conrad, R. (1979).The deaf schoolchild. London: Harper and Row.
Corballis, M. C. (1966). Rehearsal and decay in immediate recall of visually and aurally presented items.Canadian Journal of Psychology,20, 43–51.
Crowder, R. G. (1978). Language and memory. In J. F. Kavanagh & W. Strange (Eds.),Speech and language in the laboratory, school, and clinic (pp. 331–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crowder, R. G. (1983). The purity of auditory memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,B302, 251–265.
Crowder, R. G., &,Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics,5, 365–371.
Engle, R. W., Spraggins, A., & Rush, P. (1982, November). A test of sensory store theories of modality effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language. Implications of encoding strategy for order recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,8, 572–583.
Healy, A. F. (1975). Coding of temporal-spatial patterns in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,14, 481–495.
Karchmer, M. A., Milone, M. N., Jr., &Wolk, S. (1979). Educational significance of hearing loss at three levels of severity.American Annals of the Deaf,124, 97–109.
Klima, E. S.,,&Bellugi, U. (1979).The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lichtenstein, E. H. (in press). The relationships between reading processes and English skills of deaf college students. Parts I & II.Applied Psycholinguistics.
MacDougali, J. C. (1979) The development of visual processing and short-term memory in deaf and hearing children.American Annals of the Deaf,124, 16–22.
Mattingly, J. G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness In I. G. Mattingly & J. F. Kavanagh (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading (pp. 133–148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murray, D. J. (1966). Vocalization at presentation and immediate & ate recall with varying recall methods.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 9–18.
Nairne, J. S., &Walters, V. L. (1983) Silent mouthing produces modality- and suffix-like effects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 475–483.
O’Rourke, T. J. (1978).A basic vocabulary: American Sign Language for parents and children. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers.
Penney, C. G. (1975). Modality effects in short-term verbal memoryPsychological Bulletin,82, 68–84.
Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., &Tweney, R. (1981). Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in ASL.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,7, 1146–1159.
Russell, W. K., Quigley, S. P., &Power, P. J. (1976).Linguistics and deaf,children. Transformational syntax and its applications. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
Shand, M. A. (1980). Short-term coding processes in congenitally deaf signers of ASL: Natural language considerations. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 1980)Dissertation Abstracts International,41.4, 1572A-1573A.
Shand, M. A. (1982). Sign-based short-term coding of ASL signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers. Cognitive Psychology,14, 1–12
Shand, M. A., &,Klima, E. S. (1981). Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of ASL.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory,7, 464–474.
Stokoe, W. C., Casterline, D. C., &Croneberg, C. G. (1965)A dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
STuddert-Kennedy, M., &Lane, H. (1980). Clues from the differences between signed and spoken language. In U. Bellugi & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.),Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form (pp. 29–39). Weinheim: Verlag Chemic
Wallace, G., &Corballis, M. C. (1973). Short-term memory and coding strategies in the deaf.Journal of Experimental Psychology.99, 334–348.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and intrusion errors m short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 102–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant NS-18010 from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and by Grant HD-01994 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Some of the results were reported at the 9lst Meeting of the American Psychological Association in Anaheim, California, in 1983. This study was made possible by the cooperation of Gallaudet College, and especially the members of the Gallaudet Linguistics Laboratory.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krakow, R.A., Hanson, V.L. Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: Memory for signs, fingerspelling, and print. Memory & Cognition 13, 265–272 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197689
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197689