Abstract
Participants imagined rotating either themselves or an array of objects that surrounded them. Their task was to report on the egocentric position of an item in the array following the imagined rotation. The dependent measures were response latency and number of errors committed. Past research has shown that self-rotation is easier than array rotation. However, we found that imagined egocentric rotations were as difficult to imagine as rotations of the environment when people performed imagined rotations in the midsagittal or coronal plane. The advantages of imagined self-rotations are specific to mental rotations performed in the transverse plane.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alivisatos, B., &Petrides, M. (1996). Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation.Neuropsychologia,35, 111–118.
Amorim, M., &Stucchi, N. (1997). Viewer- and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent.Cognitive Brain Research,5, 229–239.
Cohen, M. S., Kosslyn, S. M., Breiter, H. C., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W., Anderson, A. K., Bookheimer, S. Y., Belliveau, J., &Rosen, B. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation: A mapping study using functional magnetic resonance imaging.Brain,119, 89–100.
Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 20–43.
Creem, S. H., Wraga, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (in press). Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: Geometry is more important than gravity.Cognition.
Franklin, N., &Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 63–76.
Huttenlocher, J., &Presson, C. C. (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information.Cognitive Psychology,11, 375–394.
Kosslyn, S. M., DiGirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., &Alpert, N. M. (1998). Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography.Psychophysiology,35, 151–161.
Milner, A. D., &Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformation of one’s body.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 172–191.
Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., Martin, C. C., Jerabek, P. A., &Lancaster, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET.Nature,375, 54–58.
Presson, C. C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 243–251.
Rigal, R. (1996). Right-left orientation, mental rotation, and perspectivetaking: When can children imagine what people see from their own viewpoint?Perceptual & Motor Skills,83, 831–842.
Roberts, R. J., &Aman, C. J. (1993). Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of reference and mental rotation.Child Development,64, 1258–1270.
Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual- cognitive universals as reflections of the world.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 2–28.
Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Tukey, J. W. (1977).Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., &Proffitt, D. R. (1999). The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations.Acta Psychologica,102, 247–264.
Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., &Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 151–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH52640, NASA Grant NCC2925, and CMU/DARPA Grant 539689-52273 to D.R.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carpenter, M., Proffitt, D.R. Comparing viewer and array mental rotations in different planes. Memory & Cognition 29, 441–448 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196395
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196395