Abstract
In the present study, we examined the effect of attentional demands on the antisaccade cost (the latency difference between antisaccades and prosaccades). Participants performed a visual search for a target digit and were required to execute a saccade toward (prosaccade) or away from (antisaccade) the target. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that the antisaccade cost was greater when the target was premasked (i.e., presented through the removal of line segments) than when it appeared as an onset. Furthermore, in premasked target conditions, the antisaccade cost was increased by the presentation of onset distractors. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that the antisaccade cost was greater in a difficult search task (a numeral 2 among 5s) than in an easy one (a 2 among 7s). The findings provide evidence that attentional demands increase the antisaccade cost. We propose that the attentional demands of the search task interfere with the attentional control required to select the antisaccade goal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Connolly, J. D., Goodale, M. A., Menon, R. S., & Munoz, D. P. (2002). Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1345–1352
Curtis, C. E., & D’Esposito, M. (2003). Success and failure suppressing reflexive behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 409–418.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
DeSouza, J. F. X., Menon, R. S., & Everling, S. (2003). Preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in humans investigated with event-related fMRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 1016–1023.
Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837.
Eckstein, M. P., Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2000). A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 425–451.
Everling, S., Dorris, M. C., Klein, R. M., & Munoz, D. P. (1999). Role of primate superior colliculus in preparation and execution of antisaccades and pro-saccades. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2740–2754.
Everling, S., & Munoz, D. P. (2000). Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 387–400.
Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 661–721.
Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1992). Characteristics of “anti” saccades in man. Experimental Brain Research, 89, 415–424.
Ford, K. A., Goltz, H. C., Brown, M. R. G., & Everling, S. (2005). Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related fMRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 429–440.
Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699–706.
Godijn, R., & Kramer, A. F. (2006). Prosaccades and antisaccades to onsets and color singletons: Evidence that erroneous prosaccades are not reflexive. Experimental Brain Research, 172, 439–448.
Godijn, R., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). Antisaccade costs with static and dynamic targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 802–815.
Godijn, R., & Pratt, J. (2002). Endogenous saccades are preceded by shifts of visual attention: Evidence from cross-saccadic priming effects. Acta Psychologica, 110, 83–102.
Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1039–1054.
Guitton, D., Buchtel, H. A., & Douglas, R. M. (1985). Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 58, 455–472.
Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279–1296.
Hallett, P. E., & Adams, B. D. (1980). The predictability of saccade latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task. Vision Research, 20, 329–339.
Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787–795.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.
Juan, C. H., Shorter-Jacobi, S. M., & Schall, J. D. (2004). Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 15541–15544.
Klein, R. M., & Pontefract, A. (1994). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Revisited! In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 333–350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kopecz, K. (1995). Saccadic reaction times in gap/overlap paradigms: A model based on integration of intentional and visual information on neural, dynamic fields. Vision Research, 35, 2911–2925.
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897–1916.
Kramer, A. F., Cassavaugh, N. D., Irwin, D. E., Peterson, M. S., & Hahn, S. (2001). Influence of single and multiple onset distractors on visual search for singleton targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 952–968.
Kramer, A. F., Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. M., & Cassavaugh, N. D. (2005). Development of attentional and oculomotor control. Developmental Psychology, 41, 760–772.
Kristjánsson, Á. (2007). Saccade landing point selection and the competition account of pro- and antisaccade generation: The involvement of visual attention—A review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 97–113.
Kristjánsson, Á., Chen, Y., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1037–1042.
Kristjánsson, Á., Vandenbroucke, M. W., & Driver, J. (2004). When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: Factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 231–244.
Massen, C. (2004). Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 475–498.
Milea, D., Lehéricy, S., Rivaud-Péchoux, S., Duffau, H., Lobel, E., Capelle, L., et al. (2003). Antisaccade deficit after anterior cingulate cortex resection. NeuroReport, 14, 283–287.
Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217–242.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315–330.
Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218–228.
Munoz, D. P., & Fecteau, J. H. (2002). Vying for dominance: Dynamic tinteractions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. Progress in Brain Research, 140, 3–19.
Munoz, D. P., & Istvan, P. J. (1998). Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 1193–1209.
Munoz, D. P., & Wurtz, R. H. (1993). Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus: II. Reversible activation and deactivation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 576–589.
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631–1647.
Olk, B., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. NeuroReport, 14, 151–155.
Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1227–1268.
Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Ploner, C. J., Müri, R. M., Gaymard, B., & Rivaud-Péchoux, S. (2002). Effects of cortical lesions on saccadic eye movements in humans. In H. J. Kaminski & R. J. Leigh (Eds.), Neurobiology of eye movements: From molecules to behavior (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 956, pp. 216–229). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Rivaud, S., Gaymard, B., & Agid, Y. (1991). Cortical control of reflexive visually-guided saccades. Brain, 114, 1473–1485.
Pratt, J., & Trottier, L. (2005). Pro-saccades and anti-saccades to onset and offset targets. Vision Research, 45, 765–774.
Roberts, R. J., Jr., Hager, L. D., & Heron, C. (1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 374–393.
Sato, T. R., & Schall, J. D. (2003). Effects of stimulus—response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field. Neuron, 38, 637–648.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2001). Attentional and oculomotor capture. In C. L. Folk & B. S. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 121–149). New York: Elsevier.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379–385.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1595–1608.
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46–54.
Trappenberg, T. P., Dorris, M. C., Munoz, D. P., & Klein, R. M. (2001). A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 256–271.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Walker, R., Husain, M., Hodgson, T. L., Harrison, J., & Kennard, C. (1998). Saccadic eye movement and working memory deficits following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1141–1159.
Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 70–76.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419–433.
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godijn, R., Kramer, A.F. The effect of attentional demands on the antisaccade cost. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 795–806 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.5.795
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.5.795