Abstract
For forced-choice two-alternative general-information questions, confidence in the correctness of the answer differed reliably for different questions, regardless of which answer was chosen. Results suggested that this choice-independent confidence is mediated by the domain familiarity of the question and by its tendency to bring to mind either few or many thoughts and considerations. Ratings of the questions on familiarity and accessibility yielded strong correlations with participants’ confidence in whichever of two answers they had chosen, and with estimates of the percentage of participants who were likely to have chosen either of the answers in a previous experiment. The results were interpreted in terms of confirmation bias: Because items differ in the extent to which they bring to mind few or many pertinent thoughts, selective focusing on supportive evidence should yield a positive correlation between mean confidence in one answer and mean confidence in the alternative answer, as if there is no competition between them.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arkes, H. R., Christensen, C., Lai, C., & Blumer, C. (1987). Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 39, 133–144.
Benjamin, A. S., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brewer, W. F., & Sampaio, C. (2006). Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach. Memory, 14, 540–552.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 552–564.
Gill, M. J., Swann, W. B., Jr., & Silvera, D. H. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 1101–1114.
Goldsmith, M., & Koriat, A. (2008). The strategic regulation of memory accuracy and informativeness. In A. S. Benjamin & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 48, pp. 1–60). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411–435.
Hall, C. C., Ariss, L., & Todorov, A. (2007). The illusion of knowledge: When more information reduces accuracy and increases confidence. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 103, 277–290.
Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 1–24.
Koriat, A. (1975). Phonetic symbolism and feeling of knowing. Memory & Cognition, 3, 545–548.
Koriat, A. (1976). Another look at the relationship between phonetic symbolism and the feeling of knowing. Memory & Cognition, 4, 244–248.
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639.
Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311–333.
Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koriat, A. (2008). Subjective confidence in one’s answers: The consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 945–959.
Koriat, A., Fiedler, K., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Inflation of conditional predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 429–447.
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517.
Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 34–53.
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 107–118.
Koriat, A., & Lieblich, I. (1977). A study of memory pointers. Acta Psychologica, 41, 151–164.
Koriat, A., Nussinson, R., Bless, H., & Shaked, N. (2008). Informationbased and experience-based metacognitive judgments: Evidence from subjective confidence. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 117–135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, A. G. R., & Bolger, F. (1994). The calibration of subjective probability: Theories and models 1980–94. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 453–482). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
McKenzie, C. R. M. (1997). Underweighting alternatives and overconfidence. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 71, 141–160.
McKenzie, C. R. M. (1998). Taking into account the strength of an alternative hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 771–792.
Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cuefamiliarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 851–861.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90–138.
Slobin, D. I. (1968). Antonymic phonetic symbolism in three natural languages. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 10, 301–305.
Sniezek, J. A., Paese, P. W., & Switzer, F. S., III (1990). The effect of choosing on confidence in choice. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 46, 264–282.
Tsai, C. I., Klayman, J., & Hastie, R. (in press). Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The preparation of this article was supported by European Commission Grant FP6-NEST: EYEWITMEM; 43460.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koriat, A. When confidence in a choice is independent of which choice is made. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 997–1001 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.997
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.997