Abstract
In two experiments, we investigated whether people are better or worse at updating memory for the location of emotional pictures than of neutral pictures. We measured participants’ memories for the locations of both arousing negative pictures and neutral pictures while manipulating practice (encountering the same event repeatedly) and interference (encountering the same picture in a different location). Memory for the context of emotional items was less likely to be corrected when erroneous and was less likely to be correctly updated when the context changed. These results suggest that initial item-context binding is more tenacious for emotional items than for neutral items, even when such binding is incorrect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bahrick, H. P. (1984). Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 1–29.
Christianson, S.-Å., &Loftus, E. F. (1991). Remembering emotional events: The fate of detailed information.Cognition & Emotion,5, 81–108.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). Psy-Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
D’Argembeau, A., &Van der Linden, M. (2004). Influence of affective meaning on memory for contextual information.Emotion,4, 173–188.
Doerksen, S., &Shimamura, A. P. (2001). Source memory enhancement for emotional words.Emotion,1, 5–11.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913).Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
Kay, H. (1955). Learning and retaining verbal material.British Journal of Psychology,46, 81–100.
Kensinger, E. A. (2008).Emotional memory across the adult lifespan. New York: Psychology Press.
Kensinger, E. A., &Corkin, S. (2003a). Effect of divided attention on the memory benefit for negative as compared to neutral words.Brain & Cognition,51, 223–225.
Kensinger, E. A., &Corkin, S. (2003b). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words?Memory & Cognition,31, 1169–1180.
Kensinger, E. A., Garoff-Eaton, R. J., &Schacter, D. L. (2006). Memory for specific visual details can be enhanced by negative arousing content.Journal of Memory & Language,54, 99–112.
Lane, S. M., Mather, M., Villa, D., &Morita, S. K. (2001). How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility.Memory & Cognition,29, 940–947.
MacKay, D. G., &Ahmetzanov, M. V. (2005). Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm: An experimental analogue of flashbulb memories.Psychological Science,16, 25–32.
MacKay, D. G., Shafto, M., Taylor, J. K., Marian, D. E., Abrams, L., &Dyer, J. R. (2004). Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: Evidence from taboo Stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks.Memory & Cognition,32, 474–488.
Marsh, E. J. (2007). Retelling is not the same as recalling: Implications for memory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,16, 16–20.
Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding: An objectbased framework.Perspectives on Psychological Science,2, 33–52.
Mather, M. (in press). When emotion intensifies memory interference. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/50079-7421(09)51003-1
Mather, M., Gorlick, M. A., &Nesmith, K. (2009). The limits of arousal’s memory-impairing effects on nearby information.American Journal of Psychology,122, 349–370.
Mather, M., &Knight, M. (2005). Goal-directed memory: The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional memory.Psychology & Aging,20, 554–570.
Mather, M., &Knight, M. (2008). The emotional harbinger effect: Poor context memory for cues that previously predicted something arousing.Emotion,8, 850–860.
Mather, M., Mitchell, K. J., Raye, C. L., Novak, D. L., Greene, E. J., &Johnson, M. K. (2006). Emotional arousal can impair feature binding in working memory.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18, 614–625.
Mather, M., &Nesmith, K. (2008). Arousal-enhanced location memory for pictures.Journal of Memory & Language,58, 449–464.
Mather, M., &Sutherland, M. R. (2009). Disentangling the effects of arousal and valence on memory for intrinsic details.Emotion Review,1, 118–119.
Mitchell, K. J., Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., &Greene, E. J. (2006). A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of short-term source and item memory for negative pictures.Neuro-Report,17, 1543–1547.
Nashiro, K., & Mather, M. (in press). How arousal affects younger and older adults’ memory binding.Experimental Aging Research.
Ochsner, K. N. (2000). Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 242–261.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NIA Grant AG025340.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Novak, D.L., Mather, M. The tenacious nature of memory binding for arousing negative items. Memory & Cognition 37, 945–952 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.945
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.945