Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts

  • Published: December 1997
  • Volume 4, pages 439–461, (1997)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts
Download PDF
  • Sally Andrews1 
  • 6188 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

This paper reviews recent research on the effects of orthographic neighbors on visual word recognition in order to resolve apparently contradictory findings. The review reveals that the empirical evidence is not as contradictory as has been claimed. Neighbors have consistently been reported to facilitate responses to words in naming and lexical decision tasks. Inhibitory effects of neighbors appear to arise from sophisticated guessing strategies in the perceptual identification task or lexical decision strategies adopted in unusual stimulus environments. For English words, there is minimal evidence of competitive influences on lexical retrieval due to higher frequency neighbors. Such effects are more common in such languages as French and Spanish, perhaps because they embody a more consistent relationship between orthography and phonology. These findings provide important constraints on assumptions about the form of lexical representations and the parallel activation mechanisms assumed to underlie lexical retrieval.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed-letter priming effects

Article 06 May 2021

Orthographic and phonological neighborhood effects in handwritten word perception

Article 26 August 2015

The orthographic similarity structure of English words: Insights from network science

Article Open access 25 June 2018

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Orthography
  • Comparative Linguistics
  • Language Processing
  • Bilingualism
  • Lexicolopgy / Vocabulary
  • Linguistics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 802–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 775–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S., &Scarratt, D. R. (in press). Rule and analogy mechanisms in pronouncing nonwords: Hough dou peapel gnew wirds.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

  • Balota, D. A. (1990). The role of meaning in word recognition. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 9–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access?. The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baluch, B., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routes in oral reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 644–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnage, D. (1998).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: Centre for Lexical Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, M.,Perea, M., &Grainger, J. (in press). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 857–871.

  • Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., &Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1197–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Content, A. (1991). The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French.Psychological Research,53, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., &Dickinson, R. G. (1976). More on the languageas-fixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, F and min F.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., &Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 696–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., &Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 781–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gak, V. G. (1976).L’orthographie du francais [French orthography]. Paris: SELAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighbourhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., &Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntsman, L. A., &Lima, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,25, 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. M., &Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1174–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. M., &Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition—Sampling the state of the art.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1311–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. F., &Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,26, 240–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., &Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure or equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V., &Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell.British Journal of Educational Psychology,58, 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxon, V., Masterton, J., Pool, M., &Keating, C. (1992). Nonword naming: Further exploration of the pseudohomophone effect in terms of orthographic neighborhood size, graphemic changes, spellingsound consistency, and reader accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 730–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D. W., Taylor, G. A., Venezky, R. L., Jastrzembski, J. E., &Lucas, P. A. (1980).Letter and word perception: Orthographic structure and visual processing in reading. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., &Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., &O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why are there complementary learning mechanisms in the hippocampus and neocortex? Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.Psychological Review,102, 419–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, P. T.,Coltheart, M.,Langdon, R., &Haller, M. (1994).Effects of orthographic neighborhood size on visual word recognition: Behavioral, electrophysiological and computational evidence. Unpublished manuscript, Macquarie University.

  • Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., &Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 452–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E., &Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition.Memory & Cognition,9, 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., &Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1129–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J., &Morton, K. E. (1985). From orthography to phonology: A new attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart. (Eds.),Surface dyslexia (pp. 335–359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peereman, R., &Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming words and pseudowords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., &Carreiras, M. (in press). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

  • Perea, M., &Pollatsek, A. (in press). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.

  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, K., &Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition.Cognition,38, 43–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., &Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 807–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, E.,Pollatsek, A.,Fisher, D. L., &Rayner, K. (in press). Towards a model of eye movements in reading.Psychological Review.

  • Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., &Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 876–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segui, J., &Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: The effects of relative prime-target frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., &Minzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory?Memory & Cognition,21, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology,104, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1991).Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., &Radeau, M. (1995). The influence of the phonological characteristics of a language on the functional units of reading: A study of French.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 330–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1988). The internal structure of syllables. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell. In P. B. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.),Reading acquisition (pp. 65–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Goswami, U., &Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory.Memory & Cognition,18, 559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., &Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Independence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior.Psychological Review,76, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, 2052, Sydney, Australia

    Sally Andrews

Authors
  1. Sally Andrews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Andrews.

Additional information

This review was prepared with support from Australian Research Council Grant AC9231195. I am grateful to Ken Forster for organizing the Cognitive Science Lexical Processing Workshop at the University of Arizona in November 1995, for which I initially prepared this review. My thanks are extended to Colin Davis for helping to collate the neighborhood statistics for the CELEX database.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, S. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, 439–461 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214334

Download citation

  • Received: 20 August 1996

  • Accepted: 02 June 1997

  • Issue Date: December 1997

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214334

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Target Word
  • Lexical Decision
  • Lexical Decision Task
  • Neighborhood Size
  • Visual Word Recognition
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

18.216.16.236

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature