Abstract
In an extension of Muter’s (1978) research, subjects studied pairs of lowercase cues and uppercase targets consisting of famous names (e.g., betsy ROSS), nonfamous names (e.g., edwin CONWAY), weakly related words (e.g., grasp BABY), and unrelated words (e.g., art GO). Following recognition tests in which surname and word targets were tested in the absence of their cues, cued recall tests for the surname and word targets were given. In semantic recognition and recall tests, the response to a surname was to be made solely on the basis of its fame, regardless of whether or not it had appeared in the study list. In episodic memory tests, the response to a surname was to be made solely on the basis of whether or not it had appeared in the study list, regardless of its fame. In all tests, the response to a nonname was to be made solely on the basis of whether or not it had appeared in the study list. The Tulving-Wiseman (1975) function accurately predicted recognition failure rates for famous surnames, whether or not they were from the study list and whether the test was episodic or semantic, and for targets from the weakly relatedword pairs. However, recognition failure rates were lower than the Tulving-Wiseman function predicted for nonfamous surnames in the episodic memory test and for targets from unrelated word pairs. Discussion focused on these results’ implications for the nature of the Tulving-Wiseman function and the psychological reality of the episodic-semantic memory distinction.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Ross, B. H. Evidence against a semantic-episodic distinction.Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 441–465.
Atkinson, R.C, Herrmann, D. J., &Wescourt, K. T. Search processes in recognition memory. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: TheLoyola Symposium. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1974.
Bartling, C. A., &Thompson, C. P. Encoding specificity: Retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 690–700.
Beoo, I. Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 113–123.
Carroll, M., &Kirsner, K. Context and repetition effects in lexical decisionand recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1982,21, 55–69.
Flexskr.A. J., &Tulving, E. Retrieval independence and recall.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 153–171.
Gardiner, J. M., &Tulving, E. Exceptions to recognition failure of recallable words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 194–209.
Herrmann, D. J., &Harwood, J. R. More evidence for the existence of separate semantic and episodic stores in long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 467–478.
Kintsch, W.The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Mccloskey, M., &Santee, J. Are episodic memory and semantic memory distinct systems?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981,7, 66–71.
Mckoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. Priming in episodic and semantic memory.Journal ofVerbal Learning and VerbalBehavior, 1979,18, 463–480.
Muter, P. Recognition failure of recallable words insemantic memory.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 9–12.
Payne, D. G., & Neely, J. H. Recognition failure of recallable famous names in a hybrid semantic/episodic memory task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, in press.
Shoben, E. J., Wescourt, K. T., &Smith, E. E. Sentence verification, sentence recognition, and the semantic-episodic distinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 304–317.
Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Tulving, E. Ecphoric processes inrecall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independentof recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982,8, 336–342.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D.M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.
Tulving, E., &Wiseman, S. Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 79–82.
Watkins, M. J., &Tulving, E. Episodic memory: When recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 5–29.
Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, Mass: Merriam, 1976.
Wiseman, S., &Tulving, E. Encoding specificity: Relation between recall superiority and recognition failure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 349–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
There search reported herewas supported by Grant R01 HD15054 awarded to the first author by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Portions of this research were reported at the 1981 meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Philadelphia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neely, J.H., Payne, D.G. A direct comparison of recognition failure rates for recallable names in episodic and semanticmemory tests. Mem Cogn 11, 161–171 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213471
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213471