Abstract
Four experiments investigated observers’ judgments of rigidity for different types of optical motion. The depicted structural deformations were of two types: (1) those with nonparallel image trajectories that are detectable from the first-order spatiotemporal relations between pairs of views; and (2) those with parallel image trajectories that can only be detected from higher order relations among three or more views. Patterns were composed of smooth flow fields in Experiments 1 and 3, and of wire frame figures in Experiments 2 and 4. For both types of display, the nonrigidity detectable from the first-order spatiotemporal structure of the motion sequence was much more salient than the deformation detectable only from the higher order spatiotemporal structure. These results indicate that observers’ judgments of rigidity are based primarily on a two-view analysis, but that some useful information can be obtained under appropriate circumstances from higher order spatiotemporal relations among three or more views.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bennett, B., &Hoffman, D. (1985). The computation of structure from fixed axis motion: Nonrigid structures.Biological Cybernetics,51, 293–300.
Bennett, B., Hoffman, D., Nicola, J., &Prakash, C. (1989). Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,6, 1052–1069.
Braunstein, M. L., &Andersen, G. J. (1984). Shape and depth perception from parallel projections of three-dimensional motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 749–760.
Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., &Pollick, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 205–214.
Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., Shapiro, L. R., Andersen, G. J., &Bennett, B. M. (1987). Minimum points and views for the recovery of three-dimensional structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 335–343.
Cornilleau-Pérès, V., &Droulez, J. (1989). Visual perception of curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 351–364.
Hoffman, D., &Bennett, B. (1985). Inferring the relative threedimensional positions of two moving points.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 242–249.
Hoffman, D., &Bennett, B. (1986). The computation of structure from fixed axis motion: Rigid structures.Biological Cybernetics,54, 71–83.
Hoffman, D. D., &Flinchbaugh, B. E. (1982). The interpretation of biological motion.Biological Cybernetics,42, 195–204.
Hogervorst, M. A., Kappers, A. M. L., &Koenderink, J. J. (1996). Structure from motion: A tolerance analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 449–459.
Huang, T., &Lee, C. (1989). Motion and structure from orthographic projections.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,11, 536–540.
Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G., &Landy, M. S. (1994). Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues.Vision Research,34, 2259–2275.
Koenderink, J. J., &van Doorn, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,8, 377–385.
Liter, J. C., Braunstein, M. L., &Hoffman, D. D. (1994). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multi-view displays.Perception,22, 1441–1465.
Norman, J. F., &Lappin, J. S. (1992). The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 386–396.
Norman, J. F., &Todd, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 279–291.
Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., &Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortions of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 663–678.
Todd, J. T. (1982). Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: A geometric analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 238–251.
Todd, J. T., Akerstrom, R. A., Reichel, F. D., &Hayes, W. (1988). Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 179–188.
Todd, J. T., &Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 419–430.
Todd, J. T., &Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 509–523.
Ullman, S. (1977).The interpretation of visual motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ullman, S. (1979).The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by AFOSR Grant F49620-93-1-0116.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perotti, V.J., Todd, J.T. & Norman, J.F. The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 666–679 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213099
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213099