Abstract
Two experiments, one using the masked priming technique combined with very brief prime exposures and the other using a new technique, the induction technique, were run in order to investigate the role of syllabic structure in speech production. Experiment 1 (masked priming) showed no effect when primes shared only the abstract syllabic structure without the phonological content, whereas the same picture stimuli produced a syllabic priming effect in Ferrand, Segui, and Grainger (1996, Experiment 4) when primes corresponded to full syllables. In contrast, the results of Experiment 2 (induction) showed that picture naming latencies were significantly faster when subjects had first read aloud a set of words with the same syllabic structure than when these words did not share the syllabic structure with the picture target. This result was also observed when the set was composed of nonwords. These results demonstrate that the abstract syllabic structure (independently of its phonological content) plays an important role in speech production depending on the task used.
Article PDF
References
Costa, A. (1995, July).Suprasegmental structures in phonological encoding. Paper presented at the European Summer School on “Aspects of Speech Production,” University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
Costa, A. (1997).La codificación fonológica en la producción del lenguaje: Unidades y procesos implicados [Phonological encoding in speech production: Units and processes]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review,93, 283–321.
Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., &Segui, J. (1994). A study of masked form priming in picture and word naming.Memory & Cognition,22, 431–441.
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., &Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 708–723.
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). The syllable’s role in word naming.Memory & Cognition,25, 458–470.
Imbs, P. (1971). Études statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences [Statistical studies on French: French language frequency counts].Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles (Trésor de la langue française). Nancy: CNRS.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacKay, D. (1987).The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U., &Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 298–305.
Meijer, P. J. A. (1996). Suprasegmental structures in phonological encoding: The CV structure.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 840–853.
Romani, C. (1992).The representation of prosodic and syllabic structure in speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M., &Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 710–725.
Sevald, C. A., &Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cueing effect in speech production.Cognition,53, 91–127.
Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., &Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 807–820.
Wheeldon, L. R., &Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 311–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Randi Martin, Gary Dell, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version. They also thank Albert Costa for suggesting the use of the induction technique and Madeleine Leveillé for programming expertise.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrand, L., Segui, J. The syllable’s role in speech production: Are syllables chunks, schemas, or both?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5, 253–258 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212947
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212947