Abstract
Directional asymmetries of vestibular induced self-motion perception and the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) were observed in darkness following adaptation to unidirectional movement of a large textured visual field. Following short-term adaptation (1 min) to visual motion with the body stationary, observers reported that their sensitivity to body rotation in darkness was reduced in the same direction as the previous adapting stimulus and was enhanced in the opposite direction. The duration of this aftereffect was at least six times longer than those of aftereffects of circular vection when the observer remained stationary in darkness. The opposite distortion of self-motion perception was observed after long-term visual adaptation (15 min) in which sensitivity to body rotation in darkness was reduced in a direction opposite to the adapting drum rotation. Changes in self-motion perception resulted from interactions between visually induced illusions of self-motion (vection) and habituation of vestibular induced self-motion perception. The short- and long-term aftereffects were both accompanied by reductions of slow-phase gain of the VOR when the body rotated in the same direction in which self-motion perception was reduced. If the observer was stationary in darkness, there was also a motion-induced afternystagmus. Following short-term adaptation, afternystagmus was too brief to interact with the modified VOR; following long-term adaptation, however, a sustained inverted afternystagmus could have summed linearly with the vestibular responses and caused an apparent modification of the VOR. A pure visual stimulus is believed to produce rapid modification of the VOR so that it can anticipate head movements and maintain stability of the retinal image while the observer tracks a moving visual field.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brandt, Th., Dichgans, J., &Buchele, W (1974) Motion habituation Inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after nystagmusExperimental Brain Research,21, 337–352
Brandi, Th., Dichgans, J., &Koenig.E. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentnc motion perceptionExperimental Brain Research,16, 476–491
Collewijn.H., Martins, A J., &Steinman, R M (1983) Compensatory eye movements during active and passive head movementsFast adaptation to changes in visual magnification Journal of Physiology (London),340, 259–286.
Dichgans, J., &Brandt, Th. (1972). Visual-vestibular interaction and motion perception In J. Dichgans & E. Bizzi (Eds.),Cerebral control of eye movements and motion perception (pp 327–338). Basel-New York: S. Karger
Fischer, M H., &Kornmuller, A. E (1930). Optokinetisch ausgeloste Bewegungswahrnehmungen und optokinetischer Nystagmus.Journal fur Psychologie und Neurologie,41, 273–308
Gonshor, A., &Melvilljones, G (1976). Short-term adaptive changes in the human vestibulo-ocular reflex arcJournal of Physiology (London),256, 361–379
Henn, V., Cohen, B., &Young, L (Eds ) (1980)Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmus (Neurosciences Research Program Bulletin, Vol 18, No. 4) Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
Koenig, E., & Dichgans, J. (1981). Aftereffects of vestibular and optokinetic stimulation and their interaction. In B. Cohn (Ed.), Vestibular and oculomotor physiology: International Meeting of the Barany Society.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,374, 434-45.
Lisberger, S. G., Miles, F A., Optican, L. M., &Eighmy, B B. (1981). Optokinetic responses in monkey: Underlying mechanisms and their sensitivity to long-term adaptive change in the vestibular reflexJournal of Neurophysiology,45, 869–890
Miles, F. A., &Eighmy, B. B. (1980). Long-term adaptive changes in primate vestibulo-ocular reflex I Behavioral observationsJournal of Neurophysiology,43, 1406–1425
Miles, F A., &Lisberger, S G (1981). Plasticity in the vestibuloocular reflex new hypothesisAnnual Review of Neuroscience,4, 273–299
Schor, C. M., Lakshminarayanan, L., &Narayan, V (1984). Optokinetic and vection responses to apparent motion in man.Vision Research,24, 1181–1187.
Schor, C. M., &Westall, C. A. (1984). Visual and vestibular sources of fixation instability in amblyopia.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,25, 729–738.
Westall, C. A., &Schor, C. M. (1985) Adaptation of the vestibuloocular reflex in amblyopiaInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,26, 1724–1730
Yee, R., &Baloh, R (1986). Adaptation of the VOR after short periods of optokinetic stimulation in man. In D Zee & E. Keller (Eds.),Adaptive processes in visual and oculomotor systems. New York: Pergamon Press.
Young, L. R., Dichgans, J., Murphy, R., &Brandt, Th. (1973) Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perceptionActa Oto-laryngologica,76, 24–31
Young, L R., &Henn, V. S. (1974) Selective habituation of vestibular nystagmus by visual stimulationActa Oto-laryngologica,77, 159–166
Young, L R., &Henn, V. S. (1976). Selective habituation of vestibular nystagmus by visual stimulation in alert monkeyActa Otolaryngologica,82, 165–171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by National Eye Institute Grant EYO 3532 and National Institutes of Health Core Grant 1-445420-32011.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schor, C., Westall, C. Rapid adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex and induced self-motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 1–8 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207587
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207587