Abstract
A considerable amount of evidence suggests that, under conditions of high discriminability, subjects are able to process multiple elements in a visual display simultaneously when searching for a single target among distractors. Relatively little emphasis, however, has been placed on the question of whether subjects can search for and detect multiple targets simultaneously. This latter question is the focus of the present report. In two experiments, we compare performance in single-target and multiple-target detection tasks in order to investigate whether or not multiple targets can be detected simultaneously. In Experiment 1, subjects searched for one or two targets that were defined by color. In Experiment 2, subjects searched for a color and/or a letter target. When the two targets were presented in the same location (e.g., a red X when Target 1 was red and Target 2 was an X), they seemed to be detected simultaneously. Implications for object-based processing of visual information are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arguin, M., &Cavanagh, P. (1988). Parallel processing of two disjunctive targets.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 22–30.
Baylis, C. G., &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Biederman, I., &Checkosky, S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 486–490.
Downing, B. D., &Gossman, J. R. (1970). Parallel processing of multi-dimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 57–60.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simul-taneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 245–252.
Egeth, H. E., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination.Cognitive Psychology,3, 674–698.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Farell, B. (1984), Attention in the processing of complex visual displays: Detecting features and their combinations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 40–64.
Hawkins, H. L. (1969). Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 56–64.
Hoffman, J. E. (1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 1–11.
Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327.
Johnston, J. C. &Pashler, H. (1990). Close binding of identity and location in feature perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 843–856.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Gibbs, B. J. (1992), The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.Cognitive Psychology,24, 178–211.
Kanwisher, N., &Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes and visual attention: Which, what and where.Current Directions in Psychological Science,1, 1–5.
Kaplan, I. T., &Carvellas, T. (1965). Scanning for multiple targets.Perceptual & Motor Skills,21, 239–243.
Lappin, J. (1967). Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology,75, 321–328.
Lindsay, R. K., &Lindsay, J. M. (1966). Reaction time and serial versus parallel information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 294–303.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Neisser, U., Novick, R., &Lazar, R. (1963). Searching for ten targets simultaneously.Perceptual & Motor Skills,17, 955–961.
Nickerson, R. S. (1967). “Same” — “Different” response times with multiattribute stimulus differences.Perceptual & Motor Skills,24, 543–554.
Nissen, M. J. (1985). Assessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 205–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pollatsek, A., &Digman, L. (1977). Dependent spatial channels in visual processing.Cognitive Psychology,9, 326–352.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Quinlan, P. T., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 455–472.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation.Perception,14, 619–628.
Saraga, E., &Shallice, T. (1973). Parallel processing of the attributes of single stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 261–270.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments.American Scientist,57, 421–457.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Ross, B. H. (1980). On appropriate procedures for combining probability distributions within the same family.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,21, 136–152.
Townsend, J. T. (1972), Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.British Journal of Statistical Psychology,25, 168–199.
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee, but they can (and should) be distinguished.Psychological Science,1, 46–54.
Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision.Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing,31, 156–177.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., &Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 527–532.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Treisman, A., &Souther, J. (1985). Search Asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Treisman, A., Sykes, M., &Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Domic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 333–361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzl, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Wolfe, J. M., Yu, K. P., Stewart, M. L., Shorter, A. D., Friedman-Hill, S. R., &Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 879–892.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
While conducting this research, the first author was supported by a National Science Foundation graduate fellowship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, C.M., Osman, A.M. Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two?. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 381–390 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206781
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206781