Abstract
This study examines the change in the perceived distance of an object in three-dimensional space when the object andlor the observer’s head is moved along the line of sight (sagittal motion) as a function of the perceived absolute (egocentric) distance of the object and the perceived motion of the head. To analyze the processes involved, two situations, labeled A and B, were used in four experiments. In Situation A, the observer was stationary and the perceived motion of the object was measured as the object was moved toward and away from the observer. In Situation B, the same visual information regarding the changing perceived egocentric distance between the observer and object was provided as in Situation A, but part or all of the change in visual egocentric distance was produced by the sagittal motion of the observer’s head. A comparison of the perceived motion of the object in the two situations was used to measure the compensation in the perception of the motion of the object as a result of the headmotion. Compensation was often clearly incomplete, and errors were often made in the perception of the motion of the stimulus object. A theory is proposed, which identifies the relation between the changes in the perceived egocentric distance of the object and the tandem motion of the object resulting from the perceived motion of the head to be the significant factor in the perception of the sagittal motion of the stimulus object in Situation B.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, G. J. (1990). Segregation of optic flow into object and self—motion components: Foundations for a general model. In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.),Perception and control of self-motion (pp. 127–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baird, J. C., &Wagner, M. (1991). Transformation theory of size judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 852–864.
Collewijn, H., Steinman, R. M., Erkelens, C. J., &Regan, D. (1991). Binocular fusion, stereopsis and stereoacuity with a moving head. In D. Regan (Ed.),Binocular vision: Vision and visual dysfunction (Vol. 9, pp. 121–136). New York: Macmillan.
Gibson, J. J. (1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals.British Journal of Psychology,49, 182–194.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gogel, W. C. (1964). The perception of depth from binocular disparity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 379–386.
Gogel, W. C. (1969). The sensing of retinal size.Vision Research,9, 1079–1094.
Gogel, W. C. (1977). An indirect measure of perceived distance from oculomotor cues.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 3–11.
Gogel, W. C. (1979). Induced motion as a function of the speed of the inducing object, measured by means of two methods.Perception,8, 255–262.
Gogel, W. C. (1982). Analysis of the perception of motion concomitant with a lateral motion of the head.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 241–250.
Gogel, W. C. (1990). A theory ofphenomenal geometry and its applications.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 105–123.
Gogel, W. C., &Tietz, J. D. (1973). Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 284–292.
Kano, C. (1991). The perception of self-motion induced by peripheral visual information in sitting andsupine postures.EcologicalPsychology,3, 241–252.
Ono, H., &Comerford, J. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 91–128). New York: Wiley.
Ono, M. E., Rjvest, J., &Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as afunction of motion parallax and absolute-distance information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 331–337.
Owen, D. H. (1990). Lexicon of terms for the perception and control of self-motion and orientation, In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.),Perception and control ofself-motion (pp. 33–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Swanston, M. T., &Gogel, W. C. (1986). Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 309–326.
Wallach, H. (1985, May). Perceiving a stable environment.Scientific American, pp. 118–124.
Wallach, H. (1987). Perceiving a stable environment when one moves.Annual Review of Psychology,38, 1–27.
Wallach, H., &Berson, E. (1989). Measurements of the illusion. In M. Hershenson (Ed.),The moon illusion (pp. 287–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wallach, H., &Flaherty, E. W. (1975). A compensation for field expansion caused by moving forward.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 445–449.
Wallach, H., Stanton, L., &Becker, D. (1974). The compensation for movement-produced changes of object orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 339–343.
Wallach, H., &Zuckerman, C. (1963). The constancy of stereoscopic depth.American Journal of Psychology,76, 404–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of this article was supported by Research Grant MH39457 from the United States National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gogel, W.C., Tietz, J.D. Determinants ofthe perception of sagittal motion. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 75–96 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206761
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206761