Abstract
Subjects adjusted a local gauge figure such as to perceptually “fit” the apparent surfaces of objects depicted in photographs. We obtained a few hundred data points per session, covering the picture according to a uniform lattice. Settings were repeated 3 times for each of 3 subjects. Almost all of the variability resided in the slant; the relative spread in the slant was about 25% (Weber fraction). The tilt was reproduced with a typical spread of about 10†. The rank correlation of the slant settings of different observers was high, thus the slant settings of different subjects were monotonically related. The variability could be predicted from the scatter in repeated settings by the individual observers. Although repeated settings by a single observer agreed within 5%, observers did not agree on the value of the slant, even on the average. Scaling factors of a doubling in the depth dimension were encountered between different subjects. The data conformed quite well to some hypothetical fiducial global surface, the orientation of which was “probed” by the subject’s local settings. The variability was completely accounted for by singleobserver scatter. These conclusions are based upon an analysis of the internal structure of the local settings. We did not address the problem of veridicality, that is, conformity to some “real object.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bülthoff, H. H., &Mallott, H. A. (1992). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading.Journal of the Optical Society of America,A5, 1749–1758.
Burke, W. L. (1985).Applied differential geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mingolla, E., &Todd, J. T. (1986). Perception of solid shape from shading.Biological Cybernetics,53, 137–151.
Stevens, K. A. (1983a). Slant-tut: The visual encoding of surface orientation.Biological Cybernetics,46, 183–195.
Stevens, K. A. (1983b). Surface tilt (the direction of slant): A neglected psychophysical variable.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 241–250.
Stevens, K. A., &Brookes, A. (1987). Probing depth in monocular images.Biological Cybernetics,56, 355–366.
Todd, J. T., &Akerstrom, R. A. (1987). Perception of threedimensional form from patterns of optical texture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 242–255.
Todd, J. T., &Reichel, F. D. (1989). Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smooth surfaces.Psychological Review,96, 643–657.
Wittkower, R. (1977).Sculpture, processes and principles. New York: Harper & Row.
Wolfram, W (1988).Mathematica, a system for doing mathematics by computer. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley,
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koenderink, J.J., Van Doorn, A.J. & Kappers, A.M.L. Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 487–496 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206710
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206710