Abstract
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during two spatial-cuing experiments using nonpredictive cues. Our primary goal was to determine the electrophysiological consequences of inhibition of return (IOR). At long (>500 msec) cue—target intervals, subjects responded more slowly to targets that appeared at or near the cued location, relative to targets that appeared on the opposite side of fixation from the cue. This behavioral IOR effect was associated with cue-validity effects on several components of the target-elicited ERP waveforms. The earliest such effect was a smaller occipital PI on valid-cue trials, which we interpret as a PI reduction. The P2 component was also smaller on validcue trials, indicating that nonpredictive spatial cues influence multiple stages of information processing at long cue—target intervals. Both of these effects were observed when sensory interactions between cue and target were likely to be negligible, indicating that they were not caused by sensory refractoriness. A different effect of cue validity, the posterior negative difference, was found when sensory interactions were likely to be greatest, indicating that it could arise from sensory refractoriness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anllo-Vento, L. (1995). Shifting attention in visual space: The effects of peripheral cuing on brain cortical potentials.International Journal of Neuroscience,80, 353–370.
Cheal, M., Chastain, G., &Lyon, D. R. (1998). Inhibition of return in identification tasks.Visual Cognition,5, 365–388.
Clark, V. P., &Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 387–402.
Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise! … Surprise?Psychophysiology,18, 493–513.
Eason, R. G. (1981). Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 203–206.
Eimer, M. (1994). An ERP study on visual spatial priming with peripheral onsets.Psychophysiology,31, 154–163.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 669–680.
Harter, M. R., Aine, C, &Schroeder, C. (1982). Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.Neuropsychologia,20, 421–438.
Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., MÜnte, T. F., Gös, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hunders-Hagen, H., Gazzaniga, M. S., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans.Nature,372, 543–546.
Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., &Mangun, G. R. (1994). The cuing of attention to visual field locations: Analysis with ERP recordings. In H. J. Heinze, T. F. Münte, & G. R. Mangun (Eds.),Cognitive electrophysiology: Event-related brain potentials in basic and clinical research (pp. 1–25). Boston: Birkhäuser.
Hillyard, S. A., &Mangun, G. R. (1987). Sensory gating as a physiological mechanism for visual selective attention. In R. Johnson, R. Parasuraman, & J. W. Rohrbaugh (Eds.),Current trends in eventrelated potential research (pp. 61–67). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hopfinger, J. B., &Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex.Psychological Science,9, 441–447.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonides, J., &Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit.Psychological Bulletin,96, 29–44.
Klein, R. M., Schmidt, W. C, &MÜller, H. J. (1998). Disinhibition of return: Unnecessary and unlikely.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 862–872.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Laberge, D. (1995).Attentional processing: The brain s art of mindfulness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.Psychophysiology,32,4–18.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1988). Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,70, 417–428.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990). Electrophysiological studies of visual selective attention in humans. In A. B. Scheibel & A. F. Wechsler (Eds.),Neurobiology of higher cognitive function (pp. 271–295). New York: Guilford.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensoryevoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 1057–1074.
Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., &Luck, S. J. (1993). Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 219–243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maylor, E. A. (1983).Components of orienting in visual space. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Durham.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531 -556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. L, Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211 -228.
Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 117–120.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location and identity based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P., Brennan, C W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Rafal, R. D., &Henik, A. (1994). The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. In T. H. Carr & D. Dagenbach (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 1–51). San Diego: Academic Press.
Reuter-Lorenz, R A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Rugg, M. D., Milner, A. D., Lines, C. R., &Phalp, R. (1987). Modulation of visual event-related potentials by spatial and non-spatial visual selective attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 85–96.
Stelmach, L. B., &Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and the perception of temporal order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 539–550.
Sternberg, S., &Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., &Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.Neuropsychologia,25, 55–72.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., &Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?Vision Research,34, 179–189.
Tassinari, G., &Berlucchi, G. (1993). Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction-time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes.Vision Research,33, 1525–1534.
Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., &Neill, W. T. (1994). Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks?Perception & Psvchophysics,55, 279–286.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., &Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 289–298.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Van Der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992).Selective attention in vision. New York: Routledge.
Wright, R. D., &Richard, C. M. (1996). Inhibition-of-return at multiple locations in visual space.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,54, 324–327.
Wright, R. D., Richard, C. M., &Mcdonald, J. J. (1995). Neutral location cues and cost/benefit analysis of visual attention shifts.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 540–548.
Wright, R. D., &Ward, L. M. (1998). The control of visual attention. In R. D. Wright (Ed.),Visual attention (pp. 132–186). New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcdonald, J.J., Ward, L.M. & Kiehl, K.A. An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 1411–1423 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206190
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206190