Abstract
Six experiments on learning in honeybees were prompted by the possibility that results previously attributed to a difference in amount of reward (20- versus 5-μl drops of sucrose solution presented on colored targets) might be due at least in part to a difference in delay of reward attendant on greater difficulty in locating the 5-μ1 drops. Substantial reduction in the diameter of the targets, which was designed to facilitate location of the drops, impaired discrimination of the colors, perhaps because their salience was reduced in the process (Experiment 3). White dots used to mark the location of the drops on larger targets also impaired discrimination of the colors, which presumably were overshadowed by the dots (Experiments 1, 2, and 4). That the dots did not serve merely to equate delay but were themselves discriminated was demonstrated in Experiment 5, which produced as well the first indication of an effect of amount of reward uncontaminated by the possibility of differential delay: Animals trained with a 5-μl drop on a dotted target of one color and a drop of the same size on an undotted target of a second color preferred the dotted target, but animals trained with a 5-μl drop on a dotted target of one color and a 20-μl drop on an undotted target of a second color preferred the undotted target. In Experiment 6, with odors substituted for the colors on the assumption that they were less likely to be overshadowed by the dots, what could be interpreted as a pure amount effect was found again. Aside from their relevance to questions about the role of amount of reward, the results have some interesting implications for the theory of discriminative learning in honeybees.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bitterman, M. E., Menzel, R., Fietz, A., &SchAfer, S. (1983). Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).Journal of Comparative Psychology,97, 107–119.
Buchanan, G. M., &Bitterman, M. E. (1988). Learning in honeybees as a function of amount and frequency of reward.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 247–255.
Buchanan, G. M., &Bitterman, M. E. (1989). Learning in honeybees as a function of amount of reward: Tests of the equal-asymptote assumption.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 475–480.
Couvillon, P. A., &Bitterman, M. E. (1982). Compound conditioning in honeybees.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,96, 192–199.
Couvillon, P. A., &Bitterman, M. E. (1984). The overlearning-extinction effect and successive negative contrast in honeybees (Apis mellifera).Journal of Comparative Psychology,98, 100–109.
Couvillon, P. A., &Bitterman, M. E. (1987). Discrimination of color-odor compounds by honeybees: Tests of a continuity model.Animal Learning & Behavior,15, 218–227.
Couvillon, P. A., &Bitterman, M. E. (1988). Compound-component and conditional discrimination of colors and odors by honeybees: Further tests of a continuity model.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 67–74.
Couvillon, P. A., &Bitterman, M. E. (1989). Reciprocal overshadowing in the discrimination of color-odor compounds by honeybees: Further tests of a continuity model.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 213–222.
Couvillon, P. A., Klosterhalfen, S., &Bitterman, M. E. (1983). Analysis of overshadowing in honeybees.Journal of Comparative Psychology,97, 154–166.
Gould, J. L. (1986). The biology of learning.Annual Review of Psychology,37, 1163–1192.
Gould, J. L. (1988). Timing of landmark learning by honeybees.Journal of Insect Behavior,1, 373–378.
Grossmann, K. E. (1970). Erlernen von Farbreizen an der Futterquelle durch Honigbienen während des Anflugs und während des Saugens.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,27, 553–562.
Grossmann, K. E. (1971). Belohnungsverzögerung beim Erlernen einer Farbe an einer Künstlichen Futterstelle durch Honigbienen.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,29, 28–41.
Hearst, E. (1989). Backward associations: Differential learning about stimuli that follow the presence versus the absence of food in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 280–290.
Lee, Y., &Bitterman, M. E. (1990). Learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera) as a function of amount of reward: Acquisition measures.Journal of Comparative Psychology,104, 152–158.
Opfinger, E. (1931). Uber die Orientierung der Biene an der Futterquelle.Zeirschrift für vergleichende Physiologie,15, 431–487.
Opfinger, E. (1949). Zur Psychologie der Duftdressuren bei bienen.Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie,31, 441–453.
Walker, M. M., Baird, D. L., &Bitterman, M. E. (1989). Failure of stationary but not of flying honeybees (Apis mellifera) to respond to magnetic field stimuli.Journal of Comparative Psychology,103, 62–69.
Walker, M. M., Lee, Y., &Bitrerman, M. E. (1990). Transfer along a continuum in the discriminative learning of honeybees (Apis mellifera).Journal of Comparative Psychology,104, 66–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant BNS-8709785 from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, Y., Bitterman, M.E. Learning in honeybees as a function of amount of reward: Control of delay. Animal Learning & Behavior 18, 377–386 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205319
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205319