Abstract
In tree experiments, the causes of forgetting of verbatim information in discourse were investigated. In experiment 1, we tested the view that the surface form of a sentence decays when linguistic elements are integrated into larger discourse structures. Contrary to such a view, the results showed that when text could be integrated, both content and verbatim memory improved. In Experiment 2, we examined the possibility that task instructions could influence the level of memory for exact wording and content. The results showed that although task did influence the amount of verbatim memory, it did not affect memory for content. Experiment 3 was an investigation of the degree to which subjects would spontaneously encode surface information on the basis of the social interactiveness of the sentences. Past research has shown that verbatim memory for insults, jokes, and other personal utterances is quite good. In this experiment, identical sentences were tested in texts that had high versus low interactiveness. Verbatim memory was much higher for the same sentences in the highly interactive context. A pragmatic account of verbatim memory is given to explain how content and instructions influence the encoding of surface form.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J R (1474) Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memoryJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 149–162
Anderson, J R, &Bower, G H (1973)Human associative memory Washington, DC Winston & Sons
Anderson, J R, &Paulson, R (1977). Representation and retention of verbatim information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 439–451
Anderson, R C, &Pichert, J. W (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift m perspectiveJournal of Verbal Learning of Verbal Behavior,17, 1–12
Barlett, F C (1932)Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Birch, S (1993).Focus effects in sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
Bock.J. K, &Brewer, W. F (1974) Reconctructive recall in sentences with alternative surface structuresJournal of Experimental Psychology,103, 837–843
Bower, G H, Black, J B, &Tuxnea, T J (1979) Scripts in memory for textCognitive Psychology,11, 177–220
Bransford, J D, Barclay, R J, &Franks, J. J (1972). Sentence memory A constructive versus interpretive approachCognitive Psychology,3, 193–209
Bransford, J D, &Franks, J J (1971) The abstraction of linguistic ideasCognitive Psycholagy,2, 331–350.
Bransford, J D., &Johnson, M K. (1973) Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). New York. Academic Press
Clark.H. H. &Sengul, C J. (1979) In search of referents for nouns and pronouns.Memory & Cognition,7, 35–41
Craik, F. I M, &Lockhart, R. S. (1972) Levels of processing. A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 599–607
Craik, F I M., &Tulving, E (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,104, 268–294
Gernsbacher, M A. (1985) Surface information loss in comprehensionCognitive Psychology,17, 324–363
Gibbs, R. W, Jr. (1981) Memory for requests to conversationJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 630–640
Gibbs, R W, Jr. &Nagaoka, A. (1985) Getting file hang of American slang Studies on understanding and remembering slang metaphorsLanguage & Speech,28, 182–194.
Graesser, A., II, &Mandler, G (1975). Recognition memory for the meaning and surface structure of sentencesJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory,1, 238–248.
Jarvella, R J (1971). Syntactic processing of connecxed speech.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 409–416
Jarvella, R J (1979) Immediate memory and discourse processing In G H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 379–421). New York Academic Press
Johnson-Lard, P. N., &Stevenson, R (1970). Memory for syntax.Nature,227, 472.
Keevan, I M. MacWhinney, B, &Mayhew, D (1977) Pragmaties in memory: A study of natural conversauonJournal of Vernal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 549–560
Kintsch, W, &Bates, E. (1977). Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lectureJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory,3, 150–159
Kolers, P A (1975) Memorial consequences of automized encodingJournal of Experimental Psychology Hunan Learning & Meman,1, 689–701
Levelt, W. J. M, &Keiter.S (1982) Surface form and memory in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,14, 78–106
MacWhinney, B, Keenan, J. M., &Reinke, P (1982) The rote of arousal in memory for conversationMemory & Cognition,19, 308–317.
Mali, B. C (1985) The role of discourse structure in understanding anaphoraJournal of Memory & Language,24, 271–289
Mani, K, &Johnson-Laird, P N (1982). The mental representation of spinal descriptionsMemory & Cognition,10, 181–187.
Morris, C. D, Bransford, J. D. &Franks, J J (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processingJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533
Murphy, G. L. (1985a). Processes of understanding anaphora.Journal of Memory & language,24, 290–303.
Murphy, G L (1985b). Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora.Journal of Pragmatics,9, 785–813
Murphy, G L (1992) Comprehension and memory for personal reference The use of social information in language processing.Discourse Processes,25, 337–356
Noice, H. (1992) Elabortive memory strategies of professional actorsApplied Cognitive Psychology,6, 417–427.
Owens, J., Bower, G H., &Black, J B (1979). The “soap opera” effect in story recallMemory & Cognition,7, 185–191
Peterson, R. G., &McIntvite, C W. (1973) The influence of semantic “relatedness” on linguistic integration and retention AmericanJournal of Psychology,86, 547–706.
Pompi, K F, &Lachman, R. (1967) Surrogate processes in the short-term retention of connected discourseJournal of Experimental Psychology,75, 143–150.
Roediger, H L., III, &Blaxton, T. A (1987) Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on printing in word-fragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 374–388.
Sacks, J. S (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysies,2, 437–442
Sachs, J S (1974). Memory in reading and listening to discourseMemory & Cognition,2, 95–100.
Sag, I. A. &Hankamer, J (1984) Toward a theory of anaphonc processingLaguistics & Philosophy,7, 325–345
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH-41704.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, G.L., Shapiro, A.M. Forgetting of verbatim information in discourse. Mem Cogn 22, 85–94 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202764
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202764