Abstract
Retrospective reporting was used to show that people spontaneously adopt different mental representations for reasoning. In two experiments, subjects solved a large number of threeterm series reasoning problems and then gave retrospective reports (verbal protocols, drawings, and forced-choice strategy selections) about their solutions. A majority of subjects’ reports could be classified reliably into two groups. One group (abstract directional thinkers) claimed to construct a mental ordering of the three geometric figures used as the terms in the problems. A second group (concrete properties thinkers) claimed to attribute physical properties to mental geometric objects. In both experiments, abstract directional thinkers made few errors and were sensitive to the number of pivot-first premises in a problem. Concrete properties thinkers made more errors and were sensitive to the use of inverse relations and the number of alternations between a relation and its inverse as a problem was read. Quantitative models of the two kinds of reasoning are presented. Implications are discussed concerning theories of reasoning, tests of reasoning, and the usefulness of retrospective reporting as a general method.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
French, J. W.The relationship of problem-solving styles to the factor composition of tests (ETS RB 63-15). Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1963.
Egan, D. E.Modifying strategies for reasoning. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1982.
References
Brooks, L. R. The suppression of visualization by reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,19, 289–299.
Clark, H. H. Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 387–404.
Desoto, C. B., Losdon, M., &Handel, S. Social reasoning and spatial paralogic.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965,2, 513–521.
Ericsson, K. A., &Simon, H. A. Verbal reports as data.Psychological Review, 1980,87, 215–251.
Grimes, D. D. Individual differences in mental representations of three-term series problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1980.
Hurtenlocher, J. Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.Psychological Review, 1968,87, 550–560.
Johnson, E. S. Validation of concept-learning strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1978,107, 237–266.
Jones, S. Visual and verbal processes in problem solving.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 201–214.
Macleod, C. M., Hunt, E. B., &Mathews, N. N. Individual differences in the verification of sentence-picture relationships.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,5, 493–508.
Mathews, N. N., Hunt, E. B., &Macleod, C. M. Strategy choice and strategy training in sentence-picture verification.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 531–548.
Mayer, R. E. Qualitatively different encoding strategies for linear reasoning premises: Evidence for single association and distance theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979,5, 1–10.
Mynatt, B. T., &Smith, K. H. Constructive processes in linear order problems revealed by sentence study times.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 357–374.
Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 231–259.
Ormrod, J. E. Cognitive processes in the solution of three-term series problems.American Journal of Psychology, 1979,92, 235–255.
Shaver, P., Pierson, L., &Lang, S. Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving.Cognition, 1974,3, 359–375.
Smith, E. R., &Miller, F. D. Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 355–362.
Sternberg, R. J. Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980,109, 119–159.
Sternberg, R. J., &Weil, E. M. An aptitude-strategy interaction in linear syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980,72, 226–239.
Trabasso, T., &Riley, C. A. On the construction and use of representations involving linear order. In R. L. Salsa (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These two experiments were summarized in a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Phoenix, Arizona, November 8-10, 1979.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egan, D.E., Grimes-Farrow, D.D. Differences in mental representations spontaneously adopted for reasoning. Mem Cogn 10, 297–307 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202421
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202421