Abstract
In three experiments, subjects’ eye movements were recorded as they read from a computer-controlled CRT. The amount of information available to the left and right of the fixation point was varied in order to determine the characteristics of the effective visual field in reading. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that readers do not obtain useful information during a fixation more than 3 or 4 letters to the left of their fixation point. The results of Experiment 3 indicated that the effective visual field does not extend any further to the left than the beginning of the word currently fixated, independent of the number of letters available to the left of fixation. When combined with the results of other research on the perceptual span in reading, the results of these experiments indicate that the effective visual field extends from the beginning of the currently fixated word (but no further than 4 characters to the left of fixation) up to about 15 characters to the right of fixation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K.Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
References
Bouma, H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words.Vision Research, 1973,13, 767–782.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 578–586.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,8, 365–368.
Myers, J. L.Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972.
O’Regan, K. Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 501–509.
O’Regan, K. The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980, in press.
Rayner, K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 65–81.
Rayner, K. Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words.Perception, 1979,8, 21–30.
Rayner, K., &Bertera, J. H. Reading without a fovea.Science, 1979,206, 468–469.
Ravner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., & Bertera, J. H. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press.
Rayner, K., Mcconkie, G. W., &Zola, D. Integrating information across eye movements.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,12, 206–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research described here represents a collaborative effort among the authors and was supported by Grant HD12727 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayner, K., Well, A.D. & Pollatsek, A. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 537–544 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198682
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198682