Abstract
To investigate whether formational properties of sign language are used spontaneously to organize long-term memory, 16 deaf college students were given a free recall task with items that could be categorized either by shared semantic category or by shared sign language hand shape. Both presentation and response modes (signed or written) were varied between subjects. Analyses revealed no effects of mode on trials to criterion or number of items recalled at 1 week. The clustering that occurred was exclusively semantic, with significantly higher clustering scores during acquisition trials in subjects required to sign their responses. In Experiment 2, formational clustering was encouraged by including formational similarity as the only experimenter-defined basis of categorization, by increasing formational similarity within categories, and by testing only subjects with high signing skills. Input and output modes were again varied between subjects. Subjects were deaf college students with deaf parents (n = 10) or hearing parents (n = 16), and hearing adults with deaf parents (n = 8). Again, spontaneous clustering by formational similarity was extremely low. In only one case— deaf subjects with hearing parents given signed input—did formational clustering increase significantly across the eight acquisition trials. After the categorical nature of the list was explained to subjects at a 1-week retention session, all groups clustered output by formational categories. Apparently, fluent signers do have knowledge of the formational structure of signs, but do not spontaneously use this knowledge as a basis of mnemonic organization in long-term memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References Notes
Friendly, M.Recall: A Fortran program for analysis of free recall protocols. Department of Psychology Reports, York University, Toronto, 1975, No. 12.
References
Baddeley, A. D. The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,18, 302–309.
Bellugi.U., &Klima, E. Structural properties of American Sign Language. In L. Liben (Ed.),Deaf children: Developmental perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Bellugi, V., Klima, E., &Siple, P. Remembering in signs.Cognition, 1975,3, 93–125.
Bellugi, U., &Siple, P. Remembering with and without words. In F. Bresson (Ed.),Current problems in psycholinguistics. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1974.
Bruce.D., &Crowley, J. Acoustic similarity effects on retrieval from secondary memory.Journal of Verbal L earning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 190–196.
Conrad, R. Short-term memory processes in the deaf.British Journal of Psychology, 1970,61, 179–195.
Conrad, R, &Rush, M. On the nature of short-term memory encoding by the deaf.Journal of Speech and Hearing Di8orders, 1965,30, 336–343.
Dolinsky, R. Clustering in free recall with alternative organizational cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 159–163.
Freund, J., &Underwood, B. Storage and retrieval cues in free recall learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 49–53.
Friedman, L. Formational properties of American Sign Language. In L. Friedman (Ed.),On the other hand. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Johnson, D. Communication characteristics of N.T.LD. students.Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 1975,8, 17–32.
Kintsch, W., &Buschke, H. Homophones and synonyms in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80,403–407.
Koh, S., Vernon, M., &Bailey, W. Free recall learning of word lists by prelingually deaf subjects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10,542–547.
Lauer, P., &Battig, W. Free recall of taxonomically and alphabetically organized word lists as a function of storage and retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 333–342.
Liben, L. Free recall by deaf and hearing children: Semantic clustering and recall in trained and untrained groups.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, in press.
Liben.L., &Drury, A. Short-term memory in deaf and hearing children in relation to stimulus characteristics.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,24,60–73.
Locke, J., &Locke, V. Deaf children’s phonetic, visual and dactylic coding in a grapheme recall task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89,142–146.
Mondani.M., Pellegrino, J., &Battig, W. Free and cued recall as a function of different levels of word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 324–329.
Ozier.M. Access to the memory trace through orthographic: and categoric information.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4. 469–485.
Roenker, D., Thompson, C, &Brown, S. Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall.Psychological Bulletin, 1971.76, 45–48.
Shuell, T. Clustering and organization in free recall.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 353–374.
Stokoe, W., Casterline, D., &Croneberg, C.A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet College Press, 1965.
Wood, G. Organization. retroactive inhibition. and free recall learning.Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9. 327–333.
Wood, G. Organization processes and free recall. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.).Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press. 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Data for this study were collected while the first author was affiliated with the University of Rochester and while the second author was affiliated with NTID. This study was partially supported through the course of an agreement with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liben, L.S., Nowell, R.C. & Posnansky, C.J. Semantic and formational clustering in deaf and hearing subjects’ free recall of signs. Memory & Cognition 6, 599–606 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198249
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198249