Abstract
Research on binocular rivalry and motion direction discrimination suggests that stochastic activity early in visual processing influences the perception of ambiguous stimuli. Here, we extend this to higher level tasks of word and face processing. In Experiment 1, we used blocked gender and word discrimination tasks, and in Experiment 2, we used a face versus word discrimination task. Stimuli were embedded in noise, and some trials contained only noise. In Experiment 1, we found a larger response in the N170, an ERP component associated with faces, to the noise-alone stimulus when observers were performing the gender discrimination task. The noise-alone trials in Experiment 2 were binned according to the observer’s behavioral response, and there was a greater response in the N170 when they reported seeing a face. After considering various top-down and priming-related explanations, we raise the possibility that seeing a face in noise may result from greater stochastic activity in neural faceprocessing regions.
Article PDF
References
Bass, J. M. P., Kenemans, J. L., &Mangun, G. R. (2002). Selective attention to spatial frequency: An ERP and source localization analysis.Clinical Neurophysiology,113, 1840–1854.
Bentin, S. (1997). Separate modules for face perception and face recognition: Electrophysiological evidence [Abstract].Journal of Psychophysiology,81.
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., &McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 551–565.
Bentin, S., &Golland, Y. (2002). Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces.Cognition,86, B1-B14.
Bentin, S., Sagiv, N., Mecklinger, A., Frederici, A., &von Cramon, Y. D. (2002). Priming visual face-processing mechanisms: Electrophysiological evidence.Psychological Science,13, 190–193.
Blake, R., &Logothetis, N. (2002). Visual competition.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,3, 1–11.
Britten, K. H., Newsome, W. T., Shadlen, M. N., Celebrini, S., &Movshon, J. A. (1996). A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT.Visual Neuroscience,13, 87–100.
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., &Movshon, J. A. (1993). Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals.Visual Neuroscience,10, 1157–1169.
Cauquil, A. S., Edmonds, G. E., &Taylor, M. J. (2000). Is the facesensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 2167–2171.
Farah, M. (1990).Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., &Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform face area increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects.Nature Neuroscience,6, 568–573.
Goffaux, V., Gauthier, I., &Rossion, B. (2003). Spatial scale contributions to early visual differences between face and object processing.Cognitive Brain Research,16, 416–424.
Hochstein, S., &Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system.Neuron,36, 791–804.
Jeffreys, D. A. (1989). A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp.Experimental Brain Research,78, 193–202.
Kanwisher, N., Stanley, D., &Harris, A. (1999). The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals.NeuroReport,10, 183–187.
Martinez, A., Di Russo, F., Anllo-Vento, L., &Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies.Clinical Neurophysiology,112, 1980–1998.
McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Belger, A., &Allison, T. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception: II. Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.Cerebral Cortex,9, 431–444.
O’Craven, K. M., &Kanwisher, N. (2000). Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 1013–1023.
Olivares, E. I., &Iglesias, J. (2000). Neural bases of perception and recognition of faces.Revista de Neurologia,30, 946–952.
Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., &Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized face-like electrophysiological responses.Psychological Science,13, 250–257.
Tanaka, J. W., &Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition.Psychological Science,12, 43–47.
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., &Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.Neuron,21, 753–759.
Wojciulik, E., Kanwisher, N., &Driver, J. (1998). Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study.Journal of Neurophysiology,79, 1574–1578.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by an NIH grant to T.A.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wild, H.A., Busey, T.A. Seeing faces in the noise: Stochastic activity in perceptual regions of the brain may influence the perception of ambiguous stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 475–481 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196598
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196598