Abstract
In this study, we investigated orthographic influences on spoken word recognition. The degree of spelling inconsistency was manipulated while rime phonology was held constant. Inconsistent words with subdominant spellings were processed more slowly than inconsistent words with dominant spellings. Thisgraded consistency effect was obtained in three experiments. However, the effect was strongest in lexical decision, intermediate in rime detection, and weakest in auditory naming. We conclude that (1) orthographic consistency effects are not artifacts of phonological, phonetic, or phonotactic properties of the stimulus material; (2) orthographic effects can be found even when the error rate is extremely low, which rules out the possibility that they result from strategies used to reduce task difficulty; and (3) orthographic effects are not restricted to lexical decision. However, they are stronger in lexical decision than in other tasks. Overall, the study shows that learning about orthography alters the way we process spoken language.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, M., &Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: Silent reading activates inner speech.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1059–1068.
Braitenberg, V. (1989). Some arguments for a theory of cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover, & R. M. Harnish (Eds.),Neural connections, mental computation (pp. 137–145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Content, A., Mousty, P., &Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. [BRULEX: A computerized lexical data base for the French language].L’Année Psychologique,90, 551–566.
Damian, M. F., &Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 119–132.
Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., &Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 264–271.
Ehri, L. C., &Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words.Applied Psycholinguistics,1, 371–385.
Forster, K. I., &Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35, 116–124.
Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J., &Dijkstra, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 77–91.
Frost, R., &Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition.Memory & Cognition,17, 302–310.
Frost, R., Repp, B. H., &Katz, L. (1988). Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print?Journal of Memory & Language,27, 741–755.
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Auditory lexical decision.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 559–567.
Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme.Journal of Research in Reading,22, 217–240.
Goswami, U. (2002a). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, and Stuart (2002).Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,82, 47–57.
Goswami, U. (2002b). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective.Annals of Dyslexia,52, 141–163.
Halle, P. A., Chereau, C., &Segui, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners’ minds.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 618–639.
Hebb, D. O. (1988). The first stage of perception: Growth of the assembly. In J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.),Neurocomputing: Foundations of research (pp. 45–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jakimik, J. A., Cole, R. A., &Rudnicky, A. I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,24, 165–178.
Jared, D., McRae, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 687–715.
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., &Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 145–171.
Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., MacLean, M., &Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 224–245.
Liberman, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 167–178): Oxford: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Liu, H., Bates, E., Powell, T., &Wulfeck, B. (1997). Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access.Applied Psycholinguistics,18, 157–180.
Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., &Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). It’s good ... but is it ART?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 336.
McRae, K., Jared, D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 43–65.
Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 47–56.
Metsala, J. L., &Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.),Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., &Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition,7, 323–331.
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., &Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur l’internet: LEXIQUE. [A lexical database of contemporary French on the Internet: LEXIQUE].L’Année Psychologique,101, 447–462.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., &Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 299–325.
Olson, D. R. (1996). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing.Cognition,60, 83–104.
Peereman, R., Content, A., &Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 151–174.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., &Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.Journal of Memory & Language,41, 416–426.
Radeau, M., &Morais, J. (1990). The uniqueness point effect in the shadowing of spoken words.Speech Communication,9, 155–164.
Rastle, K., &Davis, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 307–314.
Rueckl, J. G. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition.Ecological Psychology,14, 5–19.
Seidenberg, M. S., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 546–554.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., &Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 233–262.
Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., &Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 337–359.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1248–1268.
Taft, M., &Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 320–335.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,8, 513–520.
Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 608–631.
Van Orden, G. C. (2002). Nonlinear dynamics and psycholinguistics.Ecological Psychology,14, 1–4.
Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
Ventura, P., Kolinsky, R., Brito-Mendes, C., &Morais, J. (2001). Mental representations of the syllable internal structure are influenced by orthography.Language & Cognitive Processes,16, 393–418.
Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., &Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition.Language & Cognitive Processes,19, 57–95.
Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 270–278.
Vitevitch, M. S., &Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words.Psychological Science,9, 325–329.
Vitevitch, M. S., &Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 374–408.
Ziegler, J. C., &Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 683–689.
Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., &Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 504–515.
Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., &Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 779–793.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, J.C., Ferrand, L. & Montant, M. Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory & Cognition 32, 732–741 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195863
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195863