Abstract
The present research provides evidence that people use facial prototypes when they encounter different names. In Experiment 1, participants created face exemplars for fifteen common male names, subsets of which were endorsed as good examples by a second set of participants. These most typical faces were morphed to create face-name prototypes. In Experiment 2, participants matched one of the names to each of the prototype faces from Experiment 1. Participants’ matching choices showed convergence in naming the prototypes for many of the names. Experiment 3 utilized these same prototypes in a learning task designed to investigate if the face-name associations revealed in Experiment 2 impacted the learnability of the names. Participants learned face-name pairings that had a higher association (based on frequencies from Experiment 2) faster than pairings with a low association. Results suggest a more direct relationship between faces and names than has been previously proposed.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660.
Bruce, V., &Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.
Bruning, J. L., Polinko, N. K., &Buckingham, J. T. (1998). Connotative meanings of names and nicknames: Changes over twenty-seven years.Psychological Reports,83, 427–430.
Cohen, G. (1990). Why is it difficult to put names to faces?British Journal of Psychology,81, 287–297.
Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., &Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition.Perception,8, 431–439.
English, G., Titchener, E. B., &Weld, H. P. (1916). Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Cornell University: I. On the psychological response to unknown proper names.American Journal of Psychology,27, 430–434.
Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., &Gilbert, B. (1984). Facial stereotypes of good guys and bad guys: A replication and extension.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 549–552.
IQ Biometrix (1998).Faces (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Redwood Shores, CA: Author.
Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons.Psychological Bulletin,113, 140–163.
Lindsay, D. S., Jack, P. C., &Christian, M. A. (1991). Other-race face perception.Journal of Applied Psychology,76, 587–589.
MacLin, O. H., &Malpass, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect.Psychology, Public Policy & Law,7, 98–118.
McWeeny, K. H., Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., &Ellis, A. W. (1987). Putting names to faces.British Journal of Psychology,78, 143–149.
Mehrabian, A. (2001). Characteristics attributed to individuals on the basis of their first names.Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs,127, 59–88.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.Memory & Cognition,18, 477–495.
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., &Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion.Personality & Social Psychology Review,9, 184–211.
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.Nature,394, 884–887.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sapir, E. (1929). A study of phonetic symbolism.Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 225–239.
Satran, P. R., & Rosenkrantz, L. (2004, September). How important is a name?Parenting, 137–143.
Shevlin, M., Walker, S., Davies, M. N. O., Banyard, P., &Lewis, C. A. (2003). Can you judge a book by its cover? Evidence of self-stranger agreement on personality at zero acquaintance.Personality & Individual Differences,35, 1373–1383.
Siegel, S., &Castellan, N. J. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sloutsky, V. M., Lo, Y.-F., &Fisher, A. V. (2001). How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive influence.Child Development,72, 1695–1709.
Valentine, T., Brennen, T., &Bredart, S. (1996).The cognitive psychology of proper names: On the importance of being Ernest. New York: Routledge.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.Acta Psychologica,61, 259–273.
Valentine, T., &Moore, V. (1995). Naming faces: The effects of facial distinctiveness and surname frequency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 849–878.
Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., &Flude, B. M. (1988). Accessing stored information about familiar people.Psychological Research,50, 111–115.
Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.Perception,14, 737–746.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lea, M.A., Thomas, R.D., Lamkin, N.A. et al. Who do you look like? Evidence of facial stereotypes for male names. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 901–907 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194119
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194119