Abstract
The Roelofs effect is a distortion of perceived space that occurs when a large frame whose center is offset left or right from the objective midline is presented visually to an observer and causes a bias in the observer’s subjective judgment of midline. Experiments were designed to test whether an isolated fragment (left or right end) of a Roelofs-inducing frame was capable of generating the Roelofs effect and to determine whether prior experience with intact frames would provide a top-down influence that would bias the Roelofs effect resulting from fragment presentation. Although the fragments did induce an effect, top-down information did not play a significant role even after a 5-day training paradigm. Instead, we found that the effect generated by an intact frame was equal in magnitude to the sum of the effects generated by the individual fragments. In addition, perception was found to be differentially affected by the two ends of the frame, with fragments falling in the right visual field causing a larger effect than those falling in the left.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansorge, U. (2003). Asymmetric influences of temporally vs. nasally presented masked information: Evidence for collicular contributions to nonconscious priming effects.Brain & Cognition,51, 317–325.
Berger, A., &Henik, A. (2000). The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 421–428.
Bowers, D., &Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.Neuropsychologia,18, 491–498.
Brecher, G. A., Brecher, M. H., Kommerell, G., Sauter, F. A., &Sellerbeck, J. (1972). Relation of optical and labyrinthean orientation.Optica Acta,19, 467–471.
Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., &Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 456–469.
Brosgole, L. (1968). An analysis of induced motion.Acta Psychologica,28, 1–44.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1993). A PET study of visuospatial attention.Journal of Neuroscience,13, 1202–1226.
Coren, S., &Porac, C. (1987). Individual differences in visualgeometric illusions: Predictions from measures of spatial cognitive abilities.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 211–219.
Dassonville, P., &Bala, J. K. (2004a). Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect confounded by the same expansion of remembered space?Vision Research,44, 1025–1029.
Dassonville, P., &Bala, J. K. (2004b). Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: A mere illusion of dissociation.PLoS Biology,2, 1936–1945 (e364).
Dassonville, P., Bridgeman, B., Bala, J. K., Thiem, P., &Sampanes, A. (2004). The induced Roelofs effect: Two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?Vision Research,44, 603–611.
Dassonville, P. Walter, E., &Lunger, K. A. (2006). Illusions of space, field dependence and the efficiency of working memory.Journal of Vision,6, 476.
de Grave, D. D., Brenner, E., &Smeets, J. B. J. (2002). Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead?Vision Research,42, 2279–2285.
Harris, C. S. (1974). Beware of the straight-ahead shift—a nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision.Perception,3, 461–476.
Hubel, D. H., LeVay, S., &Wiesel, T. N. (1975). Mode of termination of retinotectal fibers in macaque monkey: An autoradiographic study.Brain Research,96, 25–40.
Jewell, G., &McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.Neuropsychologia,38, 93–110.
Joseph, J. S., &Nakayama, K. (1999). Amodal representation depends on the object seen before partial occlusion.Vision Research,39, 283–292.
Karni, A., Tanne, D., Rubenstein, B. S., Askenasy, J. J., &Sagi, D. (1994). Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill.Science,265, 679–682.
Kim, Y. H., Gitelman, D. R., Nobre, A. C., Parrish, T. B., LaBar, K. S., &Mesulam, M. M. (1999). The large-scale neurological network for spatial attention displays multifunctional overlap but differential asymmetry.NeuroImage,9, 269–277.
Lee, D. N., &Aronson, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 529–532.
Li, W., &Matin, L. (2005). The rod-and-frame effect: The whole is less than the sum of its parts.Perception,34, 699–716.
MacDougall, R. (1903). The subjective horizon.Psychological Monographs,4, 145–166.
Matin, L., &Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.Vision Research,29, 315–324.
Mesulam, M. M. (1999). Spatial attention and neglect: Parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,354, 1325–1346.
Nobre, A. C., Sebestyen, G. N., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., Frackowiack, R. S. J., &Frith, C. D. (1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography.Brain: A Journal of Neurology,120, 515–533.
Pollack, J. G., &Hickey, T. L. (1979). The distribution of retinocollicular axon terminals in rhesus monkey.Journal of Comparative Neurology,185, 587–602.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1980). Attention and the control of movements. In G. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 243–258). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Posner, M. I., &Rafal, R. D. (1987). Cognitive theories of attention and the rehabilitation of attentional deficits. In M. J. Meier, A. L. Benton, & L. Diller (Eds.),Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 182–201). Edinburgh: Curchill Livingstone.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Roelofs, C. (1935). Optische Lokalization.Archive für Augenheilkunde,109, 395–415.
Roth, H. L., Lora, A. N., &Heilman, K. M. (2002). Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.Brain,125, 2023–2035.
Sherman, S. M. (1974). Visual fields of cats with cortical and tectal lesions.Science,185, 355–357.
Shulman, G. L. (1984). An asymmetry in the control of eye movements and shifts of attention.Acta Psychologica,55, 53–69.
Sprague, J. M. (1966). Interaction of cortex and superior colliculus in mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat.Science,153, 1544–1547.
Stickgold, R., Whidbee, D., Schirmer, B., Patel, V., &Hobson, J. A. (2000). Visual discrimination task improvement: A multi-step process occurring during sleep.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 246–254.
Werner, H., Wapner, S., &Bruell, J. (1953). Experiments on sensorytonic field theory of perception: VI. Effect of position of head, eyes, and of object on the position of the apparent median plane.Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 293–299.
Williams, C., Azzopardi, P., &Cowey, A. (1995). Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: Implications for /ldblindsight./rdNeuroscience,65, 577–586.
Wilson, M. E., &Toyne, M. J. (1970). Retino-tectal and cortico-tectal projections in Macaca mulatta.Brain Research,24, 395–406.
Witkin, H. A., &Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 762–782.
Zemel, R. S., Behrmann, M., Mozer, M. C., &Bavelier, D. (2002). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 202–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was partially funded by NIH Systems Physiology Training Grant 5-T32-GM07257 to E.W.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walter, E., Dassonville, P. Fragments of the Roelofs effect: A bottom-up effect equal to the sum of its parts. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 1243–1253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193724
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193724