Abstract
In daily life, face identification requires that the observer select a single representation from hundreds if not thousands in memory. This breadth of choice is nearly impossible to replicate in the laboratory using newly learned faces, especially in the context of a Bubbles experiment (Gosselin & Schyns, 2001). In this study, we obviated this concern by studying the performance of observers in a face-naming task using 210 faces of celebrities. On each trial, we presented a face randomly sampled with Bubbles. We performed least-square multiple linear regressions on the location of the samples and on accuracy to pinpoint the facial features that were used effectively in this task. Correct face identification relied primarily on the eye areas in spatial frequency bands ranging from 4.37 to 70 cycles per face (cpf) and on the mouth and the nose in a spatial frequency band ranging from 8.75 to 17.5 cpf. A comparison with other studies (Caldara et al., 2005; Schyns, Bonnar, & Gosselin, 2002) in which Bubbles was used with a set of 10 newly learned faces revealed that although the eye areas were useful across studies, the mouth area and higher spatial frequencies gained in importance when few newly learned faces were used.
Article PDF
References
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
Bukach, C. M., Bub, D. N., Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2006). Perceptual expertise effects are not all or none: Spatially limited perceptual expertise for faces in a case of prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 48–63. doi:10.1162/089892906775250094
Bukach, C. M., Le Grand, R., Kaiser, M. D., Bub, D. N., & Tanaka, J.W. (2008). Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 227–244. doi:10.1348/ 174866407X231010
Caldara, R., Schyns, P. G., Mayer, E., Smith, M. L., Gosselin, F., & Rossion, B. (2005). Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1652–1666. doi:10.1162/089892905774597254
Chauvin, A., Worsley, K. J., Schyns, P. G., Arguin, M., & Gosselin, F. (2005). Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. Journal of Vision, 5(9, Art. 1), 659–667. doi:10.1167/5.9.1
Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431–439. doi:10.1068/p080431
Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261–2271. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00097-9
Herzog, M. H., & Fahle, M. (1997). The role of feedback in learning a vernier acuity discrimination task. Vision Research, 37, 2133–2141. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00043-6
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
Rossion, B., Kaiser, M. D., Bub, D. N., & Tanaka, J. W. (2009). Is the loss of diagnosticity of the eye region a common feature of acquired prosopagnosia? Journal of Neuropsychology, 3, 69–78. doi:10.1348/ 174866408X289944
Sadr, J., Jarudi, I., & Sinha, P. (2003). The role of eyebrows in face recognition. Perception, 32, 285–293. doi:10.1068/p5027
Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402–409. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00472
Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391–396. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.028
Simoncelli, E. P. (1999). Image and multi-scale pyramid tools [Computer software]. New York: Author.
Vinette, C., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2004). Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: It’s in the eyes. Cognitive Science, 28, 289–301. doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.01.002
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113–120.
Willenbockel, V., Sadr, J., Fiset, D., Horne, G. O., Gosselin, F., & Tanaka, J. W. (in press). Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox.2 Behavior Research Methods.
Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A.W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737–746. doi:10.1068/p140737
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) to Martin Arguin, F.G., and D.B.; by a scholarship from the James S. McDonnell Foundation (Perceptual Expertise Network) and by a postdoctoral scholarship from the Fonds Québécois de Recherche en Nature et Technologies (FQRNT) to D.F.; and by a graduate scholarship from the FQRNT to C.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butler, S., Blais, C., Gosselin, F. et al. Recognizing famous people. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1444–1449 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1444
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1444