Abstract
The “attentional model” of time estimation assumes that temporal judgments depend on the amount of attention allocated to the temporal processor (the timer). One of the main predictions of this model is that an interval will be judged shorter when attention is not allocated to the temporal parameters of the task. Previous studies combining temporal and nontemporal tasks (dual-task method) have suggested that the time spent processing the target duration might be a key factor: The less time devoted by the subject to the temporal task, the shorter the judged duration. In the two experiments presented here, subjects were asked to judge both the duration of a visual stimulus and an increment in intensity occurring at any time during this stimulus. In the second experiment, trials without intensity increments were added. The main result is that the judged duration was shorter when the increment occurred later in the stimulus or did not occur. In those cases, subjects had been expecting increment occurrence during most part of the stimulus and thus had focused for a shorter time on stimulus duration. We propose that attention shifts related to expectancy and to detection of the increment reduce subjective duration.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bonnel, A. M., Possamai, C. A., &Schmitt, M. (1987). Early modulation of visual input: A study of attentional strategies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 757–776.
Casini, L., Macar, F., &Grondin, S. (1992). Time estimation and attentional sharing. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 177–180). Dordrecht: Kluver.
Church, R. M. (1978). The internal clock. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 227–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 566–582). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory duration.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,34, 582–593.
Durup, H., &Requin, J. (1970). Hypothèses sur le rôle des probabilités conditionnelles du signal d’exécution dans le temps de réaction simple [Hypotheses concerning the role of conditional probabilities of the go signal on simple reaction times].Psychologie française,15, 37–46.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Grondin, S., &Macar, F. (1992). Dividing attention between temporal and nontemporal tasks: A performance operating characteristic— POC—analysis. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 119–128). Dordrecht: Kluver.
Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., &Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgements of time as a function of amount of information processed.American Journal of Psychology,89, 719–730.
Jackson, J. L. (1985). Is the processing of temporal information automatic or controlled? In J. A. Michon & J. L. Jackson (Eds.),Time, mind and behavior (pp. 179–190). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kramer, A., &Spinks, J. (1991). Capacity views of human information processing. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and nervous system approaches (pp. 179–248). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Macar, F., Grondin, S., &Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation.Memory & Cognition,22, 673–686.
McClain, L. (1983). Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 185–189.
Meck, W. H. (1984). Attentional bias between modalities: Effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 528–541). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Miall, R. C. (1992). Oscillators, predictions and time. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. J. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 215–227). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Navon, D. (1985). Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 88–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Navon, D., &Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the humanprocessing system.Psychological Review,86, 214–255.
Posner, M. I., &Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of human brain.Annual Review of Neurosciences,13, 25–42.
Roberts, S. (1981). Isolation of an internal clock.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 242–268.
Sperling, G., &Melchner, M. J. (1978). The attention operating characteristic: Examples from visual search.Science,202, 315–318.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 363–367.
Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock.”Psychological Monographs (Whole No. 576).
Treisman, M. (1993). On the structure of the temporal sensory system.Psychologica Belgica,33, 271–284.
Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.),Time and human cognition (pp. 365–397). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zakay, D. (1992). On prospective time estimation, temporal relevance and temporal uncertainty. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. J. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 109–118). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Zakay, D., &Block, R. (1995). An attentional-gate model of prospective time estimation. In M. Richelle, V. De Keyser, G. d’Ydewalle, & A. Vandierendonck (Eds.),Time and the dynamic control of behavior (pp. 167–178). Liège: Presses de l’Université.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casini, L., Macar, F. Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition 25, 812–818 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211325
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211325