Abstract
The potential impact of repeated questioning of a witness was examined. Subjects were shown slides depicting the aftermath of a theft and subsequently were asked several times to recall selected details of what they saw. Previous experiments employing simple verbal materials have demonstrated that information addressed by questioning becomes more recallable in the future than it would have been without such retrieval practice, but other information, especially that bearing a categorical similarity to the practiced items, becomes less recallable. Such positive and negative effects appeared in subjects’ later recall of crime-scene details in the present experiment. These results have an important implication for legal practice: Repeated interrogation of a witness can modify the witness’s memory-enhancing the recall of certain details while inducing the forgetting of other details-even when no misinformation is contained or implied in the questioning.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., &MEstes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 463–470.
Anderson, M. C., &Bjork, R. A. (1994). Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.),Inhibition in attention, memory and language (pp. 265–325). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., &MBjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1063–1087.
Anderson, M. C., &MSpellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case.Psychological Review,102, 68–100.
Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M.M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory II (pp. 396–401). London: Wiley.
Bjork, R. A., &Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.),From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bjork, R. A., &MGeiselman, R. E. (1978). Constituent processes in the differentiation of items in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 344–361.
Carrier, M., &MPashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention.Memory & Cognition,20, 633–642.
Erdelyi, M. H., &MBecker, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not words in multiple recall trials.Cognitive Psychology,6, 159–171.
Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., &MAmador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime.Journal of Applied Psychology,74, 722–727.
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., &Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis.Journal of Applied Psychology,70, 401–412.
Landauer, T. K., &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimal rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M.M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). London: Academic Press.
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report.Cognitive Psychology,7, 560–572.
Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &MBurns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.
Loftus, E. F., &MPalmer, J. P. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 585–589.
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research.Memory & Cognition,12, 531–552.
Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review.Psychological Bulletin,101, 5–27.
Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1988).Effects of incidental environmental context on human memory: Elusive or nonexistent? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Roediger, H. L., III (1974). Inhibiting effects of recall.Memory & Cognition,2, 261–269.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Challis, B. H. (1989). Hypermnesia: Improvements in recall with repeated testing. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree symposium on cognition (pp. 175–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 213–242.
Roediger, H. L., III,Payne, D. G., Gillespie, G. L., &Lean, D. S. (1982). Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 635–655.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 91–105.
Roediger, H. L., III,Stellon, C. C., &MTulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 174–188.
Scrivner, E., &MSafer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event.Journal of Applied Psychology,3, 371–377.
Tulving, E., &MArbuckle, T. Y. (1963). Sources of intratrial interference in paired-associate learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,1, 321–334.
Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist,48, 553–571.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors wish to thank Barbara A. Spellman, David S. Boninger, and Michael C. Anderson for their insightful comments on earlier drafts of this report.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, J.S., Bjork, R.A. & Handal, A. Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychon Bull Rev 2, 249–253 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210965
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210965