Next Article in Journal
Brain Cancer Survival in Canada 1996–2008: Effects of Sociodemographic Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic Factors in Asian and White American Patients with Cervical Cancer, Considering Competing Risks
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Measuring Colposcopy Quality in Canada: Development of Population-Based Indicators

1
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
2
Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
3
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
4
Department of Epidemiology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
5
BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
6
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
7
Population, Public and Aboriginal Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
8
Cervical Screening Initiatives Program, Eastern Health, St. John’s, NL, Canada
9
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
10
Ontario Cervical Screening Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
11
New Brunswick Department of Health, Fredericton, NB, Canada
12
CervixCheck Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
13
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(3), 286-291; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4709
Submission received: 5 March 2019 / Revised: 9 April 2019 / Accepted: 11 May 2019 / Published: 1 June 2019

Abstract

Background: Colposcopy is a key part of cervical cancer control. As cervical cancer screening and prevention strategies evolve, monitoring colposcopy performance will become even more critical. In the present paper, we describe population-based colposcopy quality indicators that are recommended for ongoing measurement by cervical cancer screening programs in Canada. Methods: The Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Network established a multidisciplinary expert working group to identify population-based colposcopy quality indicators. A systematic literature review was conducted to ascertain existing population and program-level colposcopy quality indicators. A systems-level cervical cancer screening pathway describing each step from an abnormal screening test, to colposcopy, and back to screening was developed. Indicators from the literature were assigned a place on the pathway to ensure that all steps were measured. A prioritization matrix scoring system was used to score each indicator based on predetermined criteria. Proposed colposcopy quality indicators were shared with provincial and territorial screening programs and subsequently revised. Results: The 10 population-based colposcopy quality indicators identified as priorities were colposcopy uptake, histologic investigation (biopsy) rate, colposcopy referral rate, failure to attend colposcopy, treatment frequency in women 18–24 years of age, re-treatment proportion, colposcopy exit-test proportion, histologic investigation (biopsy) frequency after low-grade Pap test results, length of colposcopy episode of care, and operating room treatment rate. Two descriptive indicators were also identified: colposcopist volume and number of colposcopists per capita. Summary: High-quality colposcopy services are an essential component of provincial cervical cancer screening programs. The proposed quality and descriptive indicators will permit colposcopy outcomes to be compared between provinces and across Canada so as to identify opportunities for improving colposcopy services.
Keywords: colposcopy; quality of health care; mass screening colposcopy; quality of health care; mass screening

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Decker, K.; Baines, N.; Muzyka, C.; Lee, M.; Mayrand, M.H.; Yang, H.; Fung, S.; Mercer, D.; McFaul, S.; Kupets, R.; et al. Measuring Colposcopy Quality in Canada: Development of Population-Based Indicators. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 286-291. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4709

AMA Style

Decker K, Baines N, Muzyka C, Lee M, Mayrand MH, Yang H, Fung S, Mercer D, McFaul S, Kupets R, et al. Measuring Colposcopy Quality in Canada: Development of Population-Based Indicators. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(3):286-291. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Decker, K., N. Baines, C. Muzyka, M. Lee, M. H. Mayrand, H. Yang, S. Fung, D. Mercer, S. McFaul, R. Kupets, and et al. 2019. "Measuring Colposcopy Quality in Canada: Development of Population-Based Indicators" Current Oncology 26, no. 3: 286-291. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4709

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop