Next Article in Journal
The Road Ahead for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control
Previous Article in Journal
Patient preferences for stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Meetings

Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) – Hôpital Notre-Dame, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1560 rue Sherbrooke Est, Montreal, QC H2L 4M1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21(2), 250-254; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1764
Submission received: 2 January 2014 / Revised: 3 February 2014 / Accepted: 4 March 2014 / Published: 1 April 2014

Abstract

Backgroud: We set out to determine the rate, time-trend, and defining factors associated with publication of abstracts presented at two annual scientific meetings of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (caro). Methods: All abstracts accepted for oral presentation in 2007 and 2010 were obtained from the caro program archives and searched using the PubMed database. Variables in the dataset included the year of presentation at caro and of publication in a scientific journal, time to publication (in months), publishing journal, impact factor of publishing journal, abstract research type (clinical, technical, or basic science) and disease site, country of origin, and university of the first author. Results: Overall, 88 of 172 abstracts from the 2007 (n = 102) and 2010 (n = 70) caro meetings were published in peer-reviewed journals (publication rate: 51.2%). Mean time to publication was 18.5 months. Among research types, clinical research (62.5%) and, among disease sites, prostate cancer (40.4%) were most likely to be published. Of all the abstracts, 50.1% were contributed by only 2 universities, a proportion that resembles the overall abstract publication rate of 51.2%. The conversion rate for those 2 universities (51.1%) is very similar to that for all abstracts presented at the two meetings. Conclusions: Half the abstracts presented at the 2007 and 2010 caro meetings were ultimately published in journals indexed in PubMed by about 1.5 years after presentation. Half the abstracts and publications came from just 2 universities; more must to be done to close the gap.
Keywords: abstracts; annual meetings; Canada; conversion rate; radiation oncology abstracts; annual meetings; Canada; conversion rate; radiation oncology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meissner, A.; Delouya, G.; Marcovitch, D.; Donath, D.; Taussky, D. Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Meetings. Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21, 250-254. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1764

AMA Style

Meissner A, Delouya G, Marcovitch D, Donath D, Taussky D. Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Meetings. Current Oncology. 2014; 21(2):250-254. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meissner, A., G. Delouya, D. Marcovitch, D. Donath, and D. Taussky. 2014. "Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Meetings" Current Oncology 21, no. 2: 250-254. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1764

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop