Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
28 October 2020 Helminth communities from amphibians inhabiting agroecosystems in the Pampean Region (Argentina)
Regina Draghi, Fabiana B. Drago, Pablo E. Saibene, M. Gabriela Agostini
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The objectives of this study were to describe the composition and infection patterns of the helminth communities associated with four amphibians (P. minuta, B. pulchella, L. latrans and R. fernandezae) with different life-habits, and additionally to compare the helmith fauna associated with these amphibians in agroecosystems with different land use (crops and livestock). A total of 300 anuran individuals and twelve helminth taxa were collected in sites located northeast of the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Helminth communities differed between amphibian species according to their habitat preference, digeneans were predominant in aquatic and arboreal amphibians (Hylidae) and nematodes with direct life cycle were found parasitizing semi-aquatic and terrestrial amphibians (Leptodactylidae and Bufonidae). In three of the frog species (B. pulchella, L. latrans and R. fernandezae), parasite prevalence did not vary significantly according to land use. The values of abundance and infracommunity species richness, meanwhile, varied according to land use, with the highest abundance values in crop sites and higher richness in livestock sites. Regardless of the use of land, L. latrans presented the highest values of prevalence, abundance, and richness of helminth species. This is the first study assessing the ecological aspects of parasite taxa in populations of P. minuta, B. pulchella and L. latrans that inhabit agroecosystems in Argentina.

INTRODUCTION

As established by Aho (1990), because amphibians have invaded a great variety of habitats and exhibit numerous patterns of life histories, reproductive modes, body size, and trophic relationships, they are excellent systems for exploring patterns and processes that influence the organization of helminth communities. By acting as generalist predators and as preys, amphibians play a role as intermediate and definitive hosts of a great variety of parasites in the aquatic and terrestrial food chains (Koprivnikar et al., 2012).

Among the biological characteristics of the hosts, sex has been listed influencing the number and abundance of parasitic species in vertebrates (Poulin, 1996). Differences in size, reproductive behaviour, microhabitat preference and hormonal levels related to sex, can affect the exposure of amphibians to the infective stages of parasites. This could be due to a larger colonization area (more space and resources for larger amphibians) or for a longer exposure time, for example, when males vocalize from water during the reproductive periods (Aho, 1990; McAlpine, 1997; Hamann et al., 2006a, b, 2012, 2013, 2014b).

For just over a decade, and with the establishment of the environmental parasitology as a discipline, emphasis has been placed on the role of parasites as indicators of environmental changes, demonstrating significant effects and interactions between different parasite indices and the presence and concentration of pollutants and/or environmental stressors (Poulin, 1992; Marcogliese & Cone, 1997; Marcogliese, 2005). Several authors suggest that changes in macroparasitic infections have potential as a tool in conservation research of amphibians (Sures, 2004; McKenzie, 2007; Marcogliese & Pietrock, 2011; Koprivnikar et al., 2012).

The Pampean Region, one of the richest agricultural areas of the world, has undergone a drastic anthropogenic intervention during the nineties, with the intensification of land use, the replacement of lands used for livestock by soybean crops, and the concomitant increased in the use of pesticides (insecticides, herbicides) (Agostini & Burrowes, 2015). In addition, during the past two decades the peri-urban intensive production of vegetables has increased around big cities and, in search of greater productivity, it generates a greater use of chemical fertilizers to sustain these productive levels (Defensor del pueblo de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, 2015). These changes have increased the pesticide pollution of wetlands and aquifers, the risk of release to the environment of fertilizers residues and habitat loss, with a negative impact on habitat and wildlife (Herrera et al., 2013).

The best represented and abundant anuran amphibians that inhabit this area belong to Hylidae, Leptodactylidae, and Bufonidae (Agostini, 2012). The hylids, P. minuta Günther and B. pulchella (Duméril & Bibron) are small to medium-sized frogs that use aquatic and arboreal habitats, respectively. The leptodactylid Leptodactylus latrans Steffen is a large semi-aquatic frog and the bufonid Rhinella fernandezae (Gallardo) is a medium sized species with terrestrial and fossorial habits (Cei, 1980).

Specifically, the objectives of this study were (a) to describe the infection pattern of the helminths (at both parasite population and community levels) associated with four native amphibian species, which exploit different life-habits, (b) to explore parasite-host relationships, and (c) to analyse the effects of land use (crops and livestock) on parasite prevalence, abundance and species richness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

This study was carried out in nine sampling sites located northeast of the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Five of these sites, which are called “crop” sites (C1-5), represent agroecosystems where intensive agriculture practices are carried out, mainly of soybeans and wheat, where pesticides like glyphosate, endosulfan, chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin are applied (Agostini, 2013). The remaining four, called “livestock” (L1-4), are natural grasslands used for low density dairy livestock pasture activities (Fig. 1).

Collection and examination of amphibians

Sampling took place between 2011 and 2012, distributed in all seasons, and coincided with periods of rain and high amphibian activity. The authorization was provided by the Ministerio de Agroindustria, Buenos Aires Province (Exp. n° 225500-11319/10). Due to their twilight and/or nocturnal habits, hosts were captured manually at night, using the visual encounter surveys technique (Crump & Scott, 1994). Then were transported alive to the laboratory, euthanized with an overdose of 20% benzocaine by tegument impregnation and dissected following the usual parasitological techniques (see Goldberg & Bursey, 2007). Host samples were fixed in 10% formalin and preserved in 70% ethanol. Prior to the necropsy, sex and morphometric data (snout-vent length, weight) for each specimen were recorded.

Parasitological analysis

The parasitological analysis included the examination of tegument, general cavity and respiratory, digestive, urinary and genital systems under a stereoscopic microscope. Helminths were quantified, fixed in cold 5% formaldehyde, and preserved in 70% alcohol. For its identification, nematodes and acanthocephalans were cleared in lactophenol or glycerin-alcohol and studied in temporary preparations. Trematodes and cestodes were compressed slightly between covers and submerged in 96% ethanol for approximately 24 hours. Then they were stained with hydrochloric Carmine diluted in 96% alcohol, dehydrated in an increasing series of alcohols, cleared in xylol, and mounted in Canada balsam in permanent slides. Parasites were examined under light microscopy and the taxonomic study was performed using specific keys (Yamaguti, 1961, 1963; Petrochenko 1971a, b; Anderson, 2000; Khalil et al., 1994; Gibson et al., 2002; Jones, 2005; Bray et al., 2008). The voucher parasite specimens were deposited in the Helminthological Collection of the Museo de La Plata (MLP-He) under the catalog numbers MLP-He 7626-7637 and MLP-He 7680-7690.

Data analyses

To describe the infection patterns at the population level, the prevalence, mean abundance, and mean intensity of infection (followed by their respective standard errors) were calculated following Bush et al. (1997). Additionally, the Dispersion Index was calculated as the variance (S2)/mean ratio (Krebs, 1999). In aggregated distributions the mean number of parasites is smaller than the variance, the ratio has a value higher than 1; in random distributions the value of this relationship is very close to 1 since the variance and the mean are almost equal in value; and in the regular or uniform distribution this ratio is smaller than 1. To describe the infection patterns at the community level, the species richness (S), the diversity index of Shannon-Wiener (H') (Shannon-Weaver, 1949) and the Pielou evenness index (J´) (Pielou, 1969) were calculated. Additionally, dominance (d) was obtained using the non-parametric Berger-Parker Index (Berger & Parker, 1970). Dominant, codominant, subordinate, and unsuccessful pioneer species were distinguished according to the Importance index (I) establish by Thul et al. (1985). At the infracommunity level, cases of mono or polyspecific infections were recorded. Finally, Jaccard's index for qualitative similarity, based on the presence and absence of helminths, was used to evaluate the similarity of the parasitic infracommunities among the host species. The size and sex of the host were considered to explore parasite-host relationships. We used Mann Whitney U test to test differences in size (snout-vent length, weight) between host males and females. Comparison of two proportions was calculated (Z test) to compare differences in parasite prevalence between host sexes. To prove the existence of significant differences between the abundance and intensity of infection by host sex the Mann Whitney U test was used, and the Spearman correlation when testing these parameters and its association with weight and the snout-ventral length (SVL). We conducted comparison of k proportions (χ2) to test possible variations related to host sex and size in the abundance of the helminth species that presented prevalence greater than 10%.

Fig. 1.

Study area. C1-5: crop sites, L1- 4: livestock sites (C1: 34°55′13″S; 58°06′33″O; C2: 34°55′54″S; 58°04′29″O; C3: 34°57′36″S; 58°04′57″O; C4: 35°01′42″S; 57°59′44″O; C5: 35°03′06″S; 57°58′35″O; L1: 35°04′27″S; 57°57′23″O; L2: 35°07′46″S; 57°53′11″O; L3: 35°02′22,94″S; 57°48′58,8″O; L4: 35°02′23,2″S; 57°48′58,2″O).

img-z3-1_261.jpg

To test the effects of land use on the prevalence, abundance, and richness of helminths associated with the amphibian species, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with different error distributions were applied (Zuur et al., 2009). One model for each response variable was carried out, resulting in a total of three models. Prevalence was analysed employing Binomial distribution, using the term cbind (infected number, uninfected number), while the richness and abundance were analysed with the Poisson distribution and the log link function. The significance of the random effects (sites) was evaluated with a likelihood ratio (LR) test. For all cases, models were constructed with the same variables, considering as fixed effects: land use (crops, livestock) and host species (B. pulchella, L. latrans and R. fernandezae). At the same time, the effect of site variation was controlled considering it as a random effect (nested site in use). The Tukey a posteriori test was used to detect differences between host species. The statistical analyses were carried out with R software, Version 2.15.1 (R Development Core Team 2012) and the GLMM were built with the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2012).

RESULTS

A total of 300 hosts were necropsied: 20 specimens of P. minuta with prevalence of infection of 50%, 150 B. pulchella with prevalence of 35%, 48 L. latrans with prevalence of 71%, and 82 R. fernandezae with prevalence of 27%. Quantitative descriptors of each helminth species are shown in Table 1. Most of the helminth taxa found in this study are generalists, and were found in the intestinal tract, with the small intestine as the most parasitized organ.

Fig. 2.

Contribution of each group of helminths to the proportion of the total of infected individuals for each host species.

img-z4-8_261.jpg

The compound community associated with these four amphibian species comprised twelve helminth taxa: an acanthocephalan species, Pseudoacanthocephalus cf. lutzi (Hamann, 1891) Arredondo & Gil de Pertierra, 2009 (Echinorhynchidae); six nematode taxa, Aplectana hylambatis (Baylis, 1927) Travassos, 1931, Aplectana sp., Cosmocerca parva Travassos, 1925, Cosmocercoides sp. (Cosmocercidae), Rhabdias elegans Gutiérrez, 1945 (Rhabdiasidae), and Schrankiana sp. (Atractidae); a cestode taxon, Cylindrotaenia sp. (Nematotaeniidae) and four trematode taxa Catadiscus uruguayensis Freitas & Lent, 1939, Catadiscus corderoi Mañé-Garzón, 1958 (Diplodiscidae), Rauschiella palmipedis (Lutz, 1928) Sullivan, 1977, Macroderoididae gen. sp. (Macroderoididae). Pseudoacanthocephalus cf. lutzi and C. uruguayensis were the species with the largest host distribution, being found in three host species. For five of the taxa (42%), new parasite-host associations were registered.

Fig. 2 shows the contribution of each group of helminths to the proportion of the total of infected individuals per host species studied. The predominant group is that of the trematodes, with the other groups of helminths contributing to a lesser extent according to the host species and its life habit.

At the community level, similar values of diversity, evenness and dominance were observed in parasite communities, reflecting codominance and an equivalent representation of helminth taxa in most cases. The helminth community associated with P. minuta was the exception, with a specific richness equal to two. The values of the ecological indices confirmed that in this host the helminth species do not present a similar abundance, and therefore, C. uruguayensis is dominant in this community (H´= 0.09 and J'= 0.09). For B. pulchella the specific richness was equal to four. The diversity (1.69) and the value of evenness near 1 (J'=0.84) suggests that there is no dominant species in the community. The value of importance confirmed the codominance of parasitic species according to the methodology established by Thul et al. (1985) (see Table 1). Regarding the component community of L. latrans, the specific richness was equal to nine. The values of the ecological indices suggest that there is an intermediate evenness for the abundance of species (H'= 2.09, J´= 0.65). The species with the highest community dominance index value was the nematode species Cosmocercoides latrans (d = 0.46). The values of the importance index indicate that 90% of the helminth species share the dominance of the community. Finally, for R. fernandezae the values of the ecological indices (H´= 1.83, J´= 0.78) suggest the existence of one dominant species, and the species with the highest value in terms of dominance index was C. corderoi (d = 0.46). On the other hand, following Thul et al. (1985) Cylindrotaenia sp., C. corderoi, C. parva and R. elegans are codominant species in the community, and P. cf. lutzi becomes a subordinate and rare species.

Table 1.

Prevalence (%), mean intensity (MI)/ mean abundance (MA) ± standard deviation (SD), total number (n) of parasites, infection site, dispersion index (Di), dominance index (d) and Importance index (I) of the helminth taxa found parasitizing four amphibian species from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Li= large intestine, Lu= lungs, Si= small intestine.

img-z5-2_261.gif

At the infracommunity level monospecific infections always predominated. However, cases of multiple infections (two to three helminth species) were recorded in the four amphibians analysed. For P. minuta and B. pulchella 96% of monospecific infections were observed, and two cases of double parasitosis were recorded in the last one, one digenean-acanthocephalan (C. uruguyensis - P. cf. lutzi) and one between two digeneans species (C. urugayensis - R. palmipedis), and also two cases of triple parasitosis digenean-acanthocephalan (C. uruguayensis - R. palmipedis - P. cf. lutzi). Monospecific infections predominated (79%) in L. latrans and in one host, the richness was equal to three, with two species of digeneans and one of nematode (C. uruguayensis - R. palmipedis - R. elegans) coexisting. Finally, for R. fernandezae 97.5% of monospecific infections were observed.

Fig. 3.

Similarity matrix and dendrogram.

img-AsBF_261.jpg

In order to establish the values of similarity among the infracommunities of helminths related to the hosts under study, they were compared using the Jaccard coefficient. Fig. 3 shows the similarity matrix obtained and the corresponding dendrogram. According to this, B. pulchella and R. fernandezae shared a greater number of species (IJ = 0.4).

When considering parasite-host relationships, results indicated that Pseudis minuta females were larger and heavier than males (Table 2) with significant differences found (USVL = 2, p0.05, 2 = 0.029 and UW = 31, p0.05; 2 = 0.029, respectively). Prevalence was higher for females specimens of P. minuta (Z = 1.9, p = 0.0024), as well as the values of mean intensity (MI) and mean abundance (MA), but the differences in those cases were not statistically significant (U = 8; p0.05; 2 = and U = 7; p0.05; 2 = 1, respectively) (Table 3). Additionally, the abundance of C. uruguayensis (prevalence > 10%) correlated only with the size of females (rs= 1.000, p < 0.005).

For B. pulchella specimens, females were significantly larger than males (USVL = 2336, p0.05, 2 <0.0001 and UW = 722, p0.05, 2 <0.0001). Although from a descriptive approach the prevalence was slightly higher in females (Table 4), no significant difference was found between sexes (Z = 0.27, p = 0.78). Differences were statistically significant for MI and MA (U = 329; p0.05, 2 = 0 and U = 344; p0.05; 2 ≤ 0.0001, respectively). There was no relationship between the parasite abundance of species that presented a prevalence greater than 10% (P. cf. lutzi and C. uruguayensis), and the host's body parameters (considering the total of the hosts and separated by sex). On the other hand, males of L. latrans were more robust (UW = 100, p0.05, 2 = 0.004). There was no significant difference in prevalence between host sexes (Z = 0.25, p = 0.802). Similarly, MA and MI that were higher in males, did not present statistically significant differences (U = 105, p0.05, 2 = 0.41 and U = 103, p0.05, 2 = 0.47, respectively) (Table 3). Of the species with prevalence greater than 10%, C. uruguayensis was the only one that presented a negative, high, and significant correlation with weight when considering the total number of hosts (rs= - 0.809, p < 0.005).

Finally, males of R. fernandezae were larger and heavier than females (USVL = 805; p0.05; 2 <0.0001 and weight UW = 769; p0.05; 2 <0.0001) (Table 3). From a descriptive perspective, both the prevalence of infection and the total number of helminths were slightly higher for males of R. fernandezae, but these differences were not statistically significant (Z = -0.09, p = 0.92). In contrast, values of MI and MA were higher in females (U = 6, P0.05, 2 = 0.011) (Table 3). The abundance of the only species that presented a prevalence greater than 10% (C. corderoi) did not correlate with the host's body parameters.

Table 4 shows the values of Prevalence (P) and abundance (MA) of the helminth taxa for three host species (B. pulchella, L. latrans and R. fernandezae), distinguished by sampling site. The acanthocephalan P. cf. lutzi was found in the three hosts. Its maximum prevalence value was 56% parasitizing B. pulchella on the L2 site. It should be noted that as was not found in any of the crop sites, P. minuta was excluded from the GLMM analysis.

Table 2.

Sample size (n), snout-ventral length (SVL; mm) and weight (W; g) for four amphibian species from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Mann Whitney U test, significant values (p< 0.05) in bold.

img-z7-5_261.gif

According to the GLMM, no significant effect of the sampling sites was detected, so models were corrected. In contrast, LR test showed significant random effects of sex for the models testing differences in helminths prevalence (χ2= 4.06, df =1, p= 0.04) and abundance (χ2= 4.49, df= 1, p= 0.03). The helminths prevalence did not vary significantly according to land use (Z = -0.71, p = 0.09). However, they were higher for the livestock sites in the three host species, standing out in L1 and L2 sites (Prevalence = 75% and 42%, respectively). Likewise, parasite prevalence was different across host species (Z = 5.42, p <0.05), being higher for L. latrans (Tukey a posteriori test p <0.05) (Fig. 4A). When the effect of land use on helminth abundance was explored, the analyses showed that the highest abundances were found in crop sites (Z = 3.12, p <0.05). In addition, abundances varied among host species (Z = -4.21, p <0.05), with L. latrans presenting the highest values (Fig. 4B). The analyses on the infracommunities helminth richness showed a significant effect of land use (Z = 4.40, p <0.05) with hosts from the livestock sites presenting the highest values. In turn, richness varied among host species (Z = -4.93, p <0.05), again with L. latrans specimens presenting the highest values (Fig. 4C).

Table 3.

Indicators of parasite infection by sex of the host. Sample size (n), Prevalence (%), Mean Intensity (MI)/ Mean Abundance (MA) ± standard deviation (SD), and total number (n) of parasites. Z test (%) and Mann Whitney U test (MI and MA) significant values (p< 0.05) in bold.

img-z7-8_261.gif

Table 4.

Parasites per host and sampling site. Sample size (n), Prevalence (%), Mean Abundance (MA) ± standard deviation (SD), C=crop sites, L= livestock sites.

img-z8-2_261.gif

(continued)

img-z9-2_261.gif

DISCUSSION

In the present study, a marked relationship between the habit preference of the hosts and their helminth communities was observed. Digeneans predominated in aquatic and arboreal amphibians (Hylids). On the other hand, nematodes with a direct life cycle were present in semi-aquatic and terrestrial amphibians (Leptodactylids and Bufonids). However, trematodes always dominated in numbers among the parasite communities, showing the close relationship of this group of hosts with the aquatic environment.

Aho (1990) established a trend, positioning the species according to their habitat preference in a terrestrial-aquatic environmental transition. In this trend, species of semi-aquatic amphibians possess the highest species richness of helminths (both at the population level and per individual host); terrestrial and aquatic species tend to have intermediate and similar values, while those with arboreal or fossorial habits have a lower helminth species richness. According to this and other authors, the type of diet is an additional factor that can lead to differences in the helminth communities of amphibian hosts and influence its development, (generalists vs. specialists) (Poulin, 2007; Poulin & Morand, 2004). In the present study, the helminth communities of P. minuta and B. pulchella were composed mainly of helminths with aquatic and indirect life cycles, with dominance of those whose transmission is achieved by a trophic route (e.g.: C. uruguayensis, Cylindrotaenia sp.).

In comparison with other species of Pseudis previously studied (Kehr & Hamann, 2003; Campião et al., 2010), the specific richness for P. minuta in the present study was extremely low, with only one species of digenean (C. uruguayensis) in the adult stage. Pseudis minuta was assumed abundant in the study area, but was found only in two livestock sites, and was completely absent from the crop sites. According to Agostini (2013) this can be related to the effects of pesticides as well as the presence of different stress factors in these ecosystems. Characteristics of this host as its low population density, small body size and other hosts with which it interacts could be affecting its parasitic communities (Price, 1990). Boana pulchella normally lives in the axillary pods of the long leaves of marsh plants belonging to the genus Eryngium sp. (Apiaceae), hunting and feeding mainly on diptera (Langone, 1994). The arboreal and climbing habit of this species could reduce the chances of infection by directly transmitted parasites (from the soil or the aquatic environment), causing the occurrence of trophically transmitted helminths through the ingestion of infected hosts, free infective stages (cercariae) or cystic (metacercariae). As was found by Hamann et al. (2009) and Campião et al. (2015) for climbing amphibians, the predominant group of helminths was that of trematodes, with two species: C. uruguayensis and R. palmipedis. As for the species with the highest prevalence of infection, Pseudoacanthocephalus cf. lutzi and C. uruguayensis, both have an indirect life cycle that need an aquatic intermediate host to be complete and are transmitted by trophic route. At least one species of Pseudoacanthocephalus has as intermediate host terrestrial isopods (Nakao, 2016), arthropods in close relationship with humid environments. There were often isopods in the stomach and intestinal contents of B. pulchella in our study and these arthropods have been cited as dietary components in other populations of B. pulchella in Argentina (Antoniazzi et al., 2013) and Uruguay (Maneyro et al., 2004). In addition, it is presumed that for the Cylindrotaenia species (nematotaenid cestodes with direct life cycle) infection also occurs by trophic route, but in this case by the ingestion of proglottids with embryonated eggs (Stumpf, 1981/1982; Brooks et al., 2006). With respect to R. palmipedis, a digenean with an indirect and aquatic life cycle, it presented low prevalence (6.7%) and this could also be related with the habit preference of B. pulchella. The terrestrial habitat and the mobility of R. fernandezae associated with the active search for prey (mainly ants), can favour the active penetration of infective nematode larvae (C. parva, R. elegans), resulting in a more diverse community of parasites, where the four groups of helminths were represented. Previous reports in South America indicate that amphibian helminth communities belonging to Rhinella are mostly composed of nematode species (Hamann et al., 2013, 2014a). For R. fernandezae populations, this dominance of nematodes with direct life cycle is due to the terrestrial habits of the host since the adult frogs lives in burrows and only leaves to feed (Hamman et al., 2012). In the present study, the helminth community presented a richness score of five. Trematodes were the best represented group numerically, with C. corderoi (aquatic life cycle) as the dominant species (d = 0.46). Cylindrotaenia sp. also has an aquatic life cycle, but in this case, it is assumed to be direct; and the nematode species C. parva and R. elegans are characterized by presenting monoxenous life cycles and inhabiting both wet and dry soils with infection occurring through penetration by the larval stage through the skin of the host (Anderson, 2000). The low prevalence of nematodes found in R. fernandezae may be because adults of this toad species possess a thick tegument, which could be a limiting factor for the penetration of infective larvae.

Fig. 4.

Helminth prevalence (A), abundance (B) and richness (C) at infracommunity level, in relation to land use and host species. B. pulchella (Bp), L. latrans (Ll), R. fernandezae (Rf).

img-z10-2_261.jpg

Finally, the high species richness of helminths present in L. latrans would correspond not only to their habitat preference but also to its larger size, which would provide a greater colonization surface, and a greater energy requirement, translated into a greater food intake (Duré & Kehr, 1999; Hamman et al., 2006a). Leptodactylus latrans is a generalist predator, which uses an intermediate strategy between active foraging and what is known as “sit and wait”. Their diet consists of earthworms, snails, spiders, insects, and other amphibians (Langone, 1994). According to the present study, it can be confirmed that it feeds both on land (P. cf. lutzi) and in the aquatic environment (C. uruguayensis). Habitat and mobility (water-ground) of the host, associated with the search for prey, could favour the penetration of the infective stages of the helminths, resulting in a richer and more diverse parasitic community (Hamann et al., 2013b). These data agree with those obtained by different authors for populations of L. latrans (Vicente & Santos, 1976; Stumpf, 1981/1982; Goldberg et al., 2009; Toledo et al., 2015) and are similar to those reported for other leptodactylids in Argentina (Hamann et al., 2006a, b, 2012). Leptodactylus latrans has a wide range of associated helminths, characteristic of both aquatic and terrestrial environments.

When comparing the parasite infracommunities associated with the four amphibian hosts here studied, B. pulchella and R. fernandezae shared a greater number of species and presented, therefore, similar parasite communities. In contrast, P. minuta and R. fernandezae, amphibians located at the ends of the water-land continuum, did not present species in common.

Sexual dimorphism in size may influence the intensity of infection or the richness of parasite species (McAlpine, 1997). A larger body would provide more area for the colonization of parasites and would allow a higher probability of cercariae penetration (Hamann et al., 2010). In this sense, there was a correlation between the parasitic abundance of C. uruguayensis and the body length values of P. minuta females. In addition, prevalence was higher for females. Cercariae of Catadiscus species emerge from the gastropod that acts as an intermediate host, encyst in different substrates (aquatic vegetation and other substrates) and are ingested by the definitive host in which they mature (Ostrowski de Núñez, 1978/1979). Zank et al. (2010) observed a very marked location for males of P. minuta, they are found in more remote and deeper places away from the shore of the water body. Meanwhile females remain in places close to shore. These differences in the use of microhabitats were also observed for the population of P. minuta from the sample area studied. The spatial distribution of freshwater gastropods that could act as intermediate hosts for digeneans, like planorbids, is mostly aggregated. Also, these gastropods are littoral mollusks associated with vegetation (Gutiérrez Gregoric et al., 2006). Cercariae that emerge are short-lived (Esch et al., 2002), encysting in the nearby vegetation or on some substrate. Because they are closer to shore, females of P. minuta would have a higher probability of encountering the infective stages of the parasites, and in addition, they have a larger body size that represents a greater colonization surface.

A similar situation was observed for R. fernandezae, no significant differences were found in relation to the prevalence between sexes. Nevertheless, in parasitized females the intensity and abundance of infection was higher. This could be that the encounter probability is higher for females due to variability in behaviour or their habitat selection; or could also be inferred that the probability of encountering with infective stages was similar for males and females, but in the latter, perhaps due to issues related to their feeding and / or time in water or land, the infection was more intense. However, when relating size and weight to infection indicators only for infected females, no correlation was observed: females of larger size and weight were not more parasitized. This confirmed that helminths presented an aggregate distribution in the host population.

For B. pulchella, the situation was the opposite. Although females are larger, values corresponding to the number of parasites, the mean intensity and the average abundance of infection were slightly higher for males. These differences could be attributed to a differential behaviour between sexes, either in relation to the permanence in the water body or to their prey items.

Lastly, for L. latrans the parasite prevalence was similar between males and females, so the probability of encountering with infective stages of helminths would seem to be equal between sexes. In some amphibian hosts, the body size has been related to the richness of helminths (Hamann & Kehr, 1998; Bolek & Coggins, 2003; Hamann et al., 2006b), but this was not this case, since the host's body parameters did not relate to parasitic indicators of infection. The only helminth species whose abundance correlated with the weight of the hosts was C. uruguayensis, and according to its life cycle, it could be assumed that a larger host ingests larger amounts of food (Duré & Kehr, 1999).

Beyond the intrinsic characteristics of each species, hosts that share the same location, even those belonging to different genera or species, can share helminth taxa because they are exposed to the same ecological conditions (Aho, 1990). The development of agricultural activities is identified as one of the main causes that contribute to the loss of biodiversity, not only due to the reduction and fragmentation of the habitat, but also because of the agrochemicals used (Agostini, 2013). In our study the prevalence of infection in the host species that were present in both types of land uses (crops and livestock) was not related to land use. Should the prevalences be determined by the probability of parasite-host encounter, we can assume that the occurrence and abundance of larval stages and intermediate hosts in both types of sites is similar.

In general, parasite abundance seems to be negatively affected by environmental disturbances (Hamann et al., 2006a; Koprivnikar et al., 2006; McKenzie, 2007; Hartson et al., 2011). In the present study, it varied significantly according to land use, with abundance being higher for crop agroecosystems as compared to livestock sites. This could be related to the high abundances observed for the cosmocercids nematodes with direct life cycle (A. hylambatis, Aplectana sp., C. parva, C. latrans) which also presented higher prevalences at the crop sites. Within their hosts, nematodes present an aggregated distribution, most infected hosts have few parasites and a few hosts have many parasites (Anderson & May, 1978). For these parasites, with direct and monoxenous life cycle, the interactions with the different stressors are less predictable. If the stressor has a strong and negative effect on the hosts defences, it will intensify the impact of the parasites (Lafferty & Kuris, 1999; Johnson & Chase, 2004; Johnson & Sutherland, 2003; Johnson et al., 2007), and this could be happening in crop sites.

The species richness of helminths at infracommunity level, on the other hand, was significantly higher in amphibian specimens collected at livestock sites. The presence of a greater variety of parasitic species may correspond to a healthier ecosystem (Marcogliese, 2005) since a community rich in parasites should reflect the number of host species available (Hudson et al., 2006). The amphibian communities in the livestock sites are richer and the populations of the three host species more abundant (Agostini, 2013) and this could be related to the greater richness of helminths in these sites.

Finally, the three variables studied were significantly related to the host species. Leptodactylus latrans presented the highest prevalence, abundance, and species richness at infracommunity level. As discussed above, characteristics of this host such as its size, habit (semi-aquatic) and diet (generalist) were related to its associated parasite community, and these results agree with previous ecological studies carried out on the helminth fauna of this host species in the Neotropical region (Toledo et al., 2015).

According to Campião et al. (2015) an average of four studies is needed to describe 50% of the parasite richness in anuran amphibians and only 22% of South American anurans presently match this criterion. The present study is a contribution to the description of helminth diversity in amphibians and is the first involving ecological aspects of the parasite groups for populations of P. minuta and B. pulchella throughout their distribution area, and the first one for L. latrans in Argentina. It also represents the first approach to communities of helminths associated with anurans that inhabit agroecosytems of the Pampean Region.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Micaela Medina, Giselle Mangini, Dante Ciai, Matías Rosales, Micaela Santos and Sabrina Parisi for their assistance in the field. This study was partially funded by CREOI Foundation and Neotropical Grassland Conservancy.

REFERENCES

1.

Agostini M.G. 2012. Ranas y sapos del fondo de tu casa. Anfibios de agroecosistemas de La Plata y alrededores. EDULP , La Plata , 48 pp. Google Scholar

2.

Agostini M.G. 2013. Ecotoxicología de anfibios en agroecosistemas del noreste de la región Pampeana. Dissertation Thesis, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 150 pp. Google Scholar

3.

Agostini M.G., Burrowes P.A. 2015. Infection patterns of the chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, on anuran assemblages in agro-ecosystems from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Phyllomedusa 14(2):113–126. Google Scholar

4.

Aho J.M. 1990). Helminth communities of amphibians and reptiles: Comparatives approaches to understanding patterns and processes. In : Esch G., Bush A., Aho J. (eds.), Parasite communities: Patterns and processes. Chapman and Hall , New York , pp. 157–196. Google Scholar

5.

Anderson R.C. 2000. Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission. CAB International , Oxford , 672 pp. Google Scholar

6.

Anderson R.C., May R.M. 1978. Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions. I. Regulatory processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 219–247. Google Scholar

7.

Antoniazzi C.E., López J.A., Duré M., Falico D.A. 2013. Alimentación de dos especies de anfibios (Anura: Hylidae) en la estación de bajas temperaturas y su relación con la acumulación de energía en Santa Fe, Argentina. Revista de biología tropical 61(2): 875–886. Google Scholar

8.

Arredondo N.J., Gil de Pertierra A.A. 2009. Pseudoacanthocephalus lutzi (Hamann, 1891) comb. n. (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) for Acanthocephalus lutzi (Hamann, 1891), parasite of South American amphibians. Folia Parasitológica 56: 295–304. Google Scholar

9.

Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. 2012. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Disponible en:  http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (R package version 0.999999-0). Accessed June 2019. Google Scholar

10.

Berger W.H., Parker. F.L. 1970. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science 168:1345–134. Google Scholar

11.

Bolek M.G., Coggins J.R. 2003. Helminth community structure of sympatric eastern American toad, Bufo americanus americanus, northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens, and blue-spotted salamander, Ambystoma laterale, from southeastern Wisconsin. Journal of Parasitology 89(4): 673–80. Google Scholar

12.

Bray R.A., Gibson D.I., Jones A. (eds). 2008. Keys to the Trematoda. Vol. 3. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum , Wallindford , 848 pp. Google Scholar

13.

Brooks D.R., León-Règagnon V., McLennan D.A., Zelmer D. 2006. Ecological fitting as a determinant of the community structure of platyhelminth parasites of anurans. Ecology 87: 576–585. Google Scholar

14.

Bush A.O., Lafferty K.D., Lotz J.M., Shostak A.W. 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83: 575–583. Google Scholar

15.

Campião K.M., Silva R.J.d, Ferreira V.L. 2010. Helminth component community of the paradoxal frog Pseudis platensis Gallardo, 1961 (Anura: Hylidae) from South-eastern Pantanal, Brazil. Parasitology Research 106(3): 747–751. Google Scholar

16.

Campião K.M., Ribas A.C.d.A., Morais D.H., Silva R.J.d., Tavares L.E.R. 2015. How many parasites species a frog might have? Determinants of parasite diversity in South american anurans. PLos ONE 10(10): e014057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140577Google Scholar

17.

Cei J.M. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monography 2, Monitore Zoologico Italiano (n.s.), 609 pp. Google Scholar

18.

Crump M.L., Scott N.J. 1994. Visual encounter surveys. In : Heyer W., Donnelley D.A., McDiarmid R.A., Hayec L.C., Foster M.C. (eds), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press , Washington , pp. 84–92. Google Scholar

19.

Draghi R., Drago F.B., Lunaschi L.I. (2020). A new species of Cosmocercoides (Nematoda; Cosmocercidae) and other helminths in Leptodactylus latrans (Anura; Leptodactylidae) from Argentina. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências : 92: e20180499. DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202020180499. Google Scholar

20.

Duré M.I., Kehr L.A. 1999. Explotación Diferencial de los Recursos Tróficos en Cuatro Especies de Bufonidos del Nordeste Argentino. Actas Ciencia y Técnica UNNE 6: 17–20. Google Scholar

21.

Esch G.W., Barger M.A., Fellis J.K. 2002. The transmission of digenetic trematodes: style, elegance, complexity. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42: 304–312. Google Scholar

22.

Freitas J.F.T., Lent H. 1939. Revisão do gênero Catadiscus Cohn, 1904 (Trematoda, Paramphistomoidea). Boletim Biologico 4: 305–315. Google Scholar

23.

Gibson D.I., Jones A., Bray R.A. 2002. Keys to the Trematoda. Vol. 1. CABI Publishing , Wallingford , 544 pp. Google Scholar

24.

Goldberg S.R., Bursey C.R. 2007. Helminths of two species of frogs, Lithobates taylori and Lithobates vaillanti (Ranidae), from Costa Rica. Caribbean Journal of Science 43: 65–72. Google Scholar

25.

Goldberg S.R., Bursey C.R., Caldwell J.P., Shepard D.B. 2009. Gastrointestinal helminths of six sympatric species of Leptodactylus from Tocantins state, Brazil. Comparative Parasitology 76: 258–266. Google Scholar

26.

Gutiérrez R.O. 1945. Contribución al conocimiento de los nemátodos parásitos de anfibios argentinos. Dissertation Thesis, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 37 pp. Google Scholar

27.

Gutiérrez Gregoric D.E., Núñez V., Rumi A., Roche M.A. 2006. Freshwater gastropods from Del Plata Basin, Argentina. Checklist and new locality records. Comunicaciones de la Sociedad Malacológica del Uruguay 9 (89): 51–60. Google Scholar

28.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I. 1998. Variación espacio temporal en infrapoblaciones de helmintos y su relación con las fluctuaciones poblacionales de Hyla nana (Anura, Hylidae). Cuadernos de herpetología 12: 23–33. Google Scholar

29.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2006a. Species affinity and infracommunity ordination of helminths of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in two contrasting environments from Northeastern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology 92: 1171–1179. Google Scholar

30.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2006b. Helminth community structure of the oven frog Leptodactylus latinasus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Acta Parasitológica 51(4): 294–299. Google Scholar

31.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2010. Helminth community structure of Scinax nasicus (Anura: Hylidae) from a South American subtropical area. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 93: 71–82. Google Scholar

32.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2012. Community structure of helminth parasites of Leptodactylus bufonius (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Northeastern Argentina. Zoological Studies 51: 1454–1463. Google Scholar

33.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2013. Helminth communities in the burrowing toad, Rhinella fernandezae, from Northeastern Argentina. Biología 68(6): 1155–1162. Google Scholar

34.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2014a. Erratum to “Helminth communities in the burrowing toad, Rhinella fernandezae, from Northeastern Argentina” by Monika Inés Hamann, Arturo Ignacio Kehr and Cynthya Elizabeth González. Biologia 69(2): 260–261. Google Scholar

35.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E. 2014b. Helminth community structure in the Argentinean bufonid Melanophryniscus klappenbachi: importance of habitat use and season. Parasitology Research 113(10): 3639–3649. Google Scholar

36.

Hamann M.I., Kehr A.I., González C.E., Schaefer E.F. 2009. Parasite and reproductive features of Scinax nasicus (Anura: Hylidae) from a South American Subtropical area. Interciencia 34(3): 214–218. Google Scholar

37.

Hartson R.B., Orlofske S.A., Melin V.E., Dillon R.T. Jr , Johnson P.T.J. 2011. Land use and wetland spatial position jointly determine amphibian parasite communities. Eco-health 8: 485–500. Google Scholar

38.

Herrera L.P., Panigatti J.L., Barral M.P., Blanco D.E. 2013. Bio-fuels in Argentina. Impacts of Soybean Production on Wetlands and Water. Buenos Aires. Fundación para la Conservación y el Uso Sustentable de los Humedales, Wetlands International Argentina . Google Scholar

39.

Hudson P.J., Dobson A.P., Lafferty K. 2006. Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(7): 381–385. Google Scholar

40.

Johnson P.T.J., Chase J.M. 2004. Parasites in the food web: linking amphibian malformations and aquatic eutrophication. Ecology Letters 7: 521–526. Google Scholar

41.

Johnson P.T.J., Sutherland D.R. 2003. Amphibian deformities and Ribeiroia infection: an emerging helminthiasis. Trends in Parasitology 19(8): 332–335. Google Scholar

42.

Johnson P.T.J., Chase J.M., Dosch K.L., Gross J., Hartson R.B., Larson D., Sutherland D.R., Carpenter S.R. 2007. Aquatic eutrophication promotes pathogenic infection in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 15781–15786. Google Scholar

43.

Jones A. 2005. Superfamily Paramphistomoidea Fishoeder, 1901. In : Jones A., Bray R.A., Gibson D.I. (eds), Keys to the Trematoda. Vol. 2. CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum , Wallindford , pp. 221–356. Google Scholar

44.

Kehr A.I., Hamann M.I. 2003. Ecological Aspects of Parasitism in the Tadpole of Pseudis paradoxa from Argentina. Herpetological Review 34(4): 336–341. Google Scholar

45.

Khalil L.F., Jones A., Bray R.A. 1994. Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. CAB International , Wallingford , 768 pp. Google Scholar

46.

Koprivnikar J., Forbes M.R., Baker L. 2006. Environmental factors influencing trematode prevalence in grey tree frog (Hyla versicolor) tadpoles in southern Ontario. Journal of Parasitology 92: 997–1001. Google Scholar

47.

Koprivnikar J., Marcogliese D.J., Rohr J.R., Orlofske S.A., Raffel T.R., Johnson P.T.J. 2012. Macroparasite infections of amphibians: what can they tell us? EcoHealth 9: 342–360. Google Scholar

48.

Krebs C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology, 2nd ed. Menlo Park, CA : Longman , 620 pp. Google Scholar

49.

Lafferty K.D., Kuris A.M. 1999. How environmental stress affects the impacts of parasites. Limnology and Oceanography 44 (3, part 2): 925–931. Google Scholar

50.

Langone J.A. 1994. Ranas y sapos del Uruguay (reconocimiento y aspectos biológicos). Museo Damasco Antonio Larrañaga. Serie Divulgación 5: 1–120. Google Scholar

51.

Maneyro R., Naya D., Rosa I., Canavero A., Camargo A. 2004. Diet of the South American frog Leptodactylus ocellatus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Uruguay. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 94(1): 57–61. Google Scholar

52.

Mañé-Garzón F. 1958. Un nouveau trématode des batraciens de l'Uruguay: Catadiscus corderoi n. sp. Comunicaciones Zoológicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo 78(4): 1–5. Google Scholar

53.

Marcogliese D.J. 2005. Parasites of the superorganism: are they indicators of ecosystem health? International Journal for Parasitology 35: 705–716. Google Scholar

54.

Marcogliese D.J., Cone D.K. 1997. Parasite communities as indicators of ecosystem stress. Parasitologia 39: 227–232. Google Scholar

55.

Marcogliese D.J., Pietrock M. 2011. Combined effects of parasites and contaminants on animal health: parasites do matter. Trends in Parasitology 27: 123–130. Google Scholar

56.

McAlpine D.F. 1997. Helminth communities in bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) green frogs (Rana clamitans) and leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) from New Brunswick, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 1883–1890. Google Scholar

57.

McKenzie V.J. 2007. Human land use and patterns of parasitism in tropical amphibian host. Biological Conservation 137: 102–116. Google Scholar

58.

Nakao M. 2016. Pseudoacanthocephalus toshimai sp. nov. (Palaeacanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae), a common acanthocephalan of anuran and urodelan amphibians in Hokkaido, Japan, with a finding of its intermediate host. Parasitology International 65(4): 323–332 Google Scholar

59.

Ostrowski de Núñez M. 1978/1979. Fauna de agua dulce de la república Argentina. IX. Sobre representantes de la familia Paramphistomatidae (Trematoda). Physis B38 (95): 55–62. Google Scholar

60.

Petrochenko V.I. 1971a. Acanthocephala of domestic and wild animals. Vol. 1. Keter Press , Jerusalem , 465 pp. Google Scholar

61.

Petrochenko V.I. 1971b. Acanthocephala of domestic and wild animals. Vol. 2. Keter Press , Jerusalem , 478 pp. Google Scholar

62.

Pielou E.C. 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience John Wiley and Sons, N , 294 pp. Google Scholar

63.

Poulin R. 1992. Toxic pollution and parasitism in freshwater fish. Parasitology Today 8: 58–61. Google Scholar

64.

Poulin R. 1996. Sexual inequalities in helminth infections: a cost of being a male? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 147: 287–295. Google Scholar

65.

Poulin R. 2007. Are there general laws in parasite ecology? Parasitology 134: 763–776. Google Scholar

66.

Poulin R., Morand S. 2004. Parasite biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Books , Washington, DC , 216 pp. Google Scholar

67.

Price P.W. 1990. Host populations as resources defining parasite community organization. In : Esch G., Bush A., Aho J. (eds), Parasite communities: Patterns and processes. Chapman and Hall , New York , pp. 21–40. Google Scholar

68.

Shannon C.E., Weaver W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University Illinois Press . Urbana, Illinois , 125 pp. Google Scholar

69.

Stumpf I.V.K. 1981/1982. Ciclo evolutivo da Cylindrotaenia americana Jewell, 1916 (Cyclophyllidea: Nematotaeniidae) em Bufo ictericus Spix, 1824. Acta biológica paranaense 10/11: 31–39. Google Scholar

70.

Sullivan J.J. 1977. Revision of the genus Rauschiella Babero, 1951 (Digenea: Plagiorchiidae) with a redescription of R. palmipedis (Lutz, 1928) n. comb. from venezuelan frogs. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 44: 82–86. Google Scholar

71.

Sures B. 2004. Environmental parasitology: relevancy of parasites in monitoring environmental pollution. Trends in Parasitology 20: 170–177. Google Scholar

72.

Travassos L. 1925. Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintológica dos batráchios do Brasil. Nematódeos intestinais. Sciencia Medica 3(1): 673–687. Google Scholar

73.

Travassos L. 1931. Pesquisas helmintológicas realizadas em Hamburgo. IX Ensaio monográfico da família Cosmocercidae Trav., 1925 (Nematoda). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 25(3): 237–298. Google Scholar

74.

Thul J.E., Donald D.J., Abercrombies C.L. 1985. Ecology of Parasitic Helminths of Wood Ducks, Aix sponsa, in the Atlantic Flyway. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 52(2): 297–310. Google Scholar

75.

Toledo G.M., Morais D.H., Silva R.J., Anjos L.A. 2015. Helminth communities of Leptodactylus latrans (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from the Atlantic rainforest, south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Helminthology 89 250–254. Google Scholar

76.

Vicente J.J., Santos E. 1976. Fauna helmintológica de Leptodactylus ocellatus (L., 1758) de Volta Redonda, Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Atas da Sociedade de Biologia do Rio de Janeiro 18(1): 27–42. Google Scholar

77.

Yamaguti S. 1961. Systema Heminthum. Vol. 3. The nematodes of vertebrate. Interscience Publishers Inc , New York , 1261 pp. Google Scholar

78.

Yamaguti S. 1963. Systema Helminthum. Vol. 5. Acanthocephala. Interscience Publishers Inc , New York , 423 pp. Google Scholar

79.

Zank C., Di-Bernardo M., Maneyro R., Colombo P., Fusinatto L.A., da Fonte L.F.M. 2010. Spatial and temporal distribution of Pseudis minuta (Anura, Hylidae, Hylinae) and environmental variables related to its reproductive activity in Reserva Biológica do Lami, southern Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 100(2): 145–150. Google Scholar

80.

Zuur A.F., Leno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A., Smith G.M. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer , New York , 574 pp. Google Scholar
Regina Draghi, Fabiana B. Drago, Pablo E. Saibene, and M. Gabriela Agostini "Helminth communities from amphibians inhabiting agroecosystems in the Pampean Region (Argentina)," Revue suisse de Zoologie 127(2), 261-274, (28 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0020
Accepted: 15 June 2020; Published: 28 October 2020
KEYWORDS
amphibians
Argentina
helminth communities
pampean region
Back to Top