Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Image Quality of Neck Structures Scanned on Chest CT with Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media
Previous Article in Journal
A Rare Case of Thymic Rosai-Dorfman Disease Mimicking Malignancy on 18F-FDG PET/CT
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Suprasellar Ganglioglioma Arising from the Third Ventricle Floor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally in this work.
Tomography 2022, 8(6), 2844-2853; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060238
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 10 November 2022 / Accepted: 11 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Neuroimaging)

Abstract

:
Gangliogliomas are uncommon intracranial tumors that include neoplastic and abnormal ganglion cells, and show positive immunohistochemical staining for GFAP and syn. This type of lesion occurs more frequently in the temporal lobe than in other areas; they are extremely rare in the suprasellar region. To the best of our knowledge, including our case, 19 cases of GGs have been found in the suprasellar region. Among them, five tumors invaded the optic nerve, nine tumors invaded the optic chiasm, one tumor invaded the optic tract, and two tumors invaded the entire optic chiasmal hypothalamic pathway. In the present study, we describe the first case of suprasellar GGs arising from the third ventricle floor that was removed through the endoscopic endonasal approach. In addition, we summarize the clinical characteristics of GGs, such as age of onset, gender distribution, MRI signs, main clinical symptoms, and treatment methods for GG cases.

1. Introduction

GGs account for 0.3~1.4% of all intracranial tumors [1]. They are a type of relatively rare, well-differentiated, low-grade intracranial tumor that is common in young people and children, with a higher prevalence in men. Seizures are the most common clinical manifestation. GG is characterized by a combination of dysplastic neurons and neoplastic glial components. Histopathologically, suprasellar GGs are so rare that, to our best knowledge, only 19 cases have been described in the literature, including the case in our present study. This study is the first case to document the case of suprasellar GGs originating from the third ventricle floor. We describe the case of an asymptomatic suprasellar GG case. A middle-aged female patient underwent endoscopic resection through a trans-sphenoidal approach, and her postoperative course was stable.

2. Patient Information

A 40-year-old female patient complained of occasional dizziness, no other particular discomfort, and no obvious positive signs were discovered in the neurological exam that was performed. The patient had normal vision and dot-like visual field defects in the left eye. The pituitary and its target-gland hormone levels were normal. Her pituitary MRI scan showed an oval mass with a homogeneous signal behind the suprasellar pituitary stalk, of about 17 mm × 11 mm × 17 mm in size, with a low signal on the T1 image, high signal on the T2 image, and a mild forward displacement of the pituitary stalk. There was no abnormality in the shape and signal of the pituitary stalk and pituitary itself. The MRI showed that the lesion in the suprasellar area was slightly enhanced, while the pituitary and pituitary stalk were significantly enhanced (Figure 1). Differential diagnosis of NF1: the patient did not have a first-degree relative with NF1, café au lait patches, freckling in the axillary or groin, iris Lisch nodules, cutaneous or subcutaneous neurofibromas, or one plexiform neurofibroma. Sphenoid wing dysplasia and the thinning of the long bone cortex were also absent. To clarify the differential diagnosis, we recommended genetic testing, but the patient declined. After explaining the purpose and risks of the operation to the patient and her family, informed consent was provided. An operation, using a nasal approach, was performed to surgically remove the tumor.

3. Operative Note

The tuberculum sella was removed under endoscopy, and the dura mater was then opened. The tumor behind the optic nerve and the pituitary stalk could be observed after dissecting the arachnoid membrane (Figure 2A,B). Using the endoscope, the tumor was found to be located at the center of the back of the pituitary stalk; the pituitary stalk was pushed to one side and the arachnoid membrane around the tumor was separated. During the operation, it was observed that the tumor originated from the third ventricle floor between the pituitary stalk and the mammillary body. Unlike the third ventricle floor, the lesion retained clear boundaries and presented no adhesion to the surrounding structure. The tumor was gray–white, tough in texture, with only a few tiny vessels on the surface and no calcifications (Figure 2A,B; purple arrow). The origin of the tumor is poorly demarcated and pale yellow in the figure. After the tumor was removed, the third ventricle was also opened (Figure 2C; blue arrow). Artificial dura mater and the vascularized pedicle nasoseptal flap were used to repair the skull base defect, and routine hemostasis was performed by the expansion of a polymer sponge.

4. Histopathology

The tumor is gray–white, gross in appearance, and firm in texture. Microscopically, gliosis was observed with an increased density and enlarged nuclei. The hematoxylin and eosin-stained section presents rare dysmorphic ganglion cells (Figure 3A; yellow arrow). No obvious mitotic image can be observed, and immature neurons are randomly scattered or aggregated in a nest shape (Figure 3A; green arrow). Immunohistochemical staining shows that CD56, GFAP, S100, Syn, and Neun (partly) are positive in the tumor cells, and CK, EMA, CgA, IDH1, P53, and CD34 are negative (Figure 3B–D). The Ki-67 index is about 1%. The histopathological diagnosis was ganglioglioma (WHO grade I).

5. Postoperative Course

Following the operation, the neurological condition and endocrine function of the patient remained normal. There was no serious surgical complication, electrolyte disturbance, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed that the tumor was completely removed, and the pituitary gland, pituitary stalk, and optic chiasm were structurally intact in the imaging. In addition, the margin of the operation area was enhanced postoperatively—we considered that this was a sign of postoperative capillary reactional enhancement; no other obvious abnormality in the image was observed. All these results suggest that the tumor was completely removed. A pathological examination revealed that the tumor was composed of neoplastic ganglion cells and low-grade astrocytic cells. The patient’s condition was stable following the operation and she was discharged with no complications. One month after the surgery, the patient received further radiotherapy treatment in the oncology department of our hospital, in consideration of the 2018 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Glioma, which determine that, for patients aged ≥ 40 years or patients with an incomplete tumor resection, radiotherapy or chemotherapy is recommended. Moreover, the 2020 NCCN Central Nervous System Clinical Practice Guidelines highlight that elderly patients should receive early radiotherapy following surgery. We informed the patient and her family of this, and they expressed their desire to receive radiation therapy [2,3].

6. Review of Ganglioglioma Cases

We conducted an English-language search of the PubMed and Embase databases, using “ganglioglioma” as the search term; including our case, we identified 19 patients with a diagnosis of suprasellar GGs (Table 1). The average presentation age was 20.95 ± 3.42 years; the range was 6–52 years of age. Most of the patients were male (12/19). The symptoms of these patients were mainly visual dysfunction (15/19), some patients suffered from obstructive hydrocephalus (4/19) due to the compression of the third ventricle and required emergency external ventricular drainage or a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and we discovered that some patients had rare symptoms, such as middle cerebral artery cerebral infarction, limb hemiplegia, diabetes insipidus, and abnormal weight gain, as well as symptoms related to hyperprolactinemia [4,5,6,7].
When referring to the pre-operative MRI findings of these patients, most (12/19) patients had cystic and solid tumors, and nearly half (11/19) of the tumors could be enhanced, and the degree of enhancement was uneven.
In the previous reports, biopsy was chosen in some cases (9/19), which may have been due to surgical difficulties. Six patients (6/19) received radiotherapy following surgery, and two patients (2/19) received chemotherapy [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Unfortunately, the data to assess the effect and prognosis of adjuvant therapy were unavailable.
Table 1. Reported cases of suprasellar ganglioglioma.
Table 1. Reported cases of suprasellar ganglioglioma.
PublicationsAge, GenderSigns and SymptomsSymptom DurationLocationMRI SignsTreatment SolutionsPreoperative Diagnosis
Khoi D. Nguyen et al. [8]25, MHeadache, agitation, mental status decline, obstructive hydrocephalusAcute onsetSellar/suprasellar regionHeterogeneously enhanced 3.6 cm × 4.2 cm cystic and solid massSTRCraniopharyngioma
Shanop Shuangshoti et al. [7]21, FHyperprolactinemia, decreased vision2 Y 6 MonSuprasellar and optic chiasmHeterogeneously enhanced 3.0 cm × 2.8 cm cystic and solid massNTRPilocytic astrocytoma
Laura Pastor et al. [5]9, MHeadache and epistaxis, lefthemiparesis and gait impairment (middle cerebral arteryinfarction)2 MonSuprasellarHeterogeneously enhanced 2.2 cm × 2.5 cm cystic and solid massBiopsyGerm-cell neoplasm, hypothalamic glioma
Ruchika Gupta et al. [6]7, MAbnormal weight gain, diabetes insipidus, decreased vision, obstructive hydrocephalus18 MonSuprasellar4.2 cm × 4.5 cm cystic and solid massBiopsy + RGerminoma
Rakesh Jalali et al. [18]7, FDecreased vision6 MonSuprasellar and left parasellar regionsEnhanced cystic and solid massBiopsy + ROptic pathway glioma, germ-cell neoplasm
Ishita Pant et al. [19] 8, FDecreased vision, headaches5 YSuprasellar, third ventricle7 × 6.5 cm cystic and solid massNTRChiasmatic glioma
John D. Rolston et al. [20]49, MDeveloped headaches, decreased visionSeveral monthsSuprasellarEnhanced 2 × 1.2 cm cystic and solid massBiopsyNR
Ramazan Albayrak et al. [21]52, FDecreased vision, headachesSeveral monthsRight optic tractDiffuse contrast enhancement in right optic tract massPartial resectionOptic tract glioma
Jonathan Chilton et al. [9]33, MDecreased visionNROptic chiasm, optic nerveSolid massBiopsyOptic pathway glioma
Donald J. Bergin et al. [10]13, MProptosis, decreased vision, optic atrophyNROptic nerve3.0 × 1.8 cm left retrobulbar optic nerveNROptic pathway glioma
Kazuhiko Sugiyama et al. [4]12, FDecreased vision, gradual hemiplegia of left limb4 YOptic nerveCystic and solid massBiopsyOptic pathway glioma
Yoshito Sugita et al. [11]26, MDecreased vision, headache, obstructive hydrocephalus1 MonOptic chiasm, suprasellarCystic and solid massPartially resection + V-P shunt + RNR
Burak Karaaslan et al. [12]12, FDecreased vision6 MonSuprasellar, optic nerveHeterogeneously enhanced 3.0 cm × 3.0 cm cystic and solid massBiopsyNR
G. V. Vajramani et al. [13]18, MDecreased vision1 YOptic nerve, optic tract, geniculateHeterogeneously enhanced cystic and solid massBiopsy + CNR
G. T. Liu et al. [14]6, MHeadache, vomiting, decreased visionNRNRNRBiopsy + RNR
William Y. Lu et al. [15]38, MDecreased vision6 MonOptic nerveEnhanced 4.8 × 0.9 cm massSurgeryNR
Pietro Spennato et al. [16]6, MDecreased visionNRSellar, suprasellar, third ventricleCystic and solid massSurgery + V-P shunt + R + CNR
Bashar Abuzayed et al. [17]16, FDecreased vision15 YHypothalamus, optic chiasmUniformly enhanced solid massSurgeryNR
ShaoGuang Li et al.40, FDizziness, visual field defectNRSuprasellarEnhanced 1.7 × 1.1 cm cystic massGTR + RCraniopharyngioma
R: radiation therapy; C: chemotherapy; GTR: gross total resection; NTR: near-total resection; STR: subtotal resection; NR: not reported; M: male; F: female; Y: years; Mon: months; V–P shunt: ventriculoperitoneal shunt.
In addition, we also searched for GGs in the sellar region and ventricle. We discovered 5 cases of GGs in the hypophysial fossa and 15 cases in the ventricle. Among the five cases, with the exception of one case accidentally discovered via autopsy, four patients had hormonal disorders in clinical manifestations. Among the four patients, two cases had elevated growth hormone levels, one case had elevated prolactin levels, and one case had elevated antidiuretic hormone levels. All cases received surgical treatment, and the operation was successful [22,23,24,25]. Among the 15 patients with ventricular GGs, 9 tumors (9/15) were located in the lateral ventricle, 5 tumors (5/15) in the third ventricle, and 1 tumor (1/15) in the fourth ventricle. Among these cases, eight patients (8/15) had dilated ventricles and seven patients (7/15) had decreased visual acuity, in which two patients (2/7) recovered in their visual acuity in a short period of time following surgery, two patients (2/15) had tumor hemorrhages, one patient (1/15) had intramedullary dissemination and metastasis, and three patients (3/15) had hydrocephalus that could not be relieved following surgery, which was subsequently improved by the insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
From the literature review, we determine that the differences between optic pathway tumors and third ventricle tumors include the following concepts: in terms of clinical manifestations, ventricular tumors are generally characterized by increased intracranial pressure, such as a severe headache, projectile vomiting, and papilledema. Visual path tumors often present changes in visual acuity or the visual field, such as obvious monocular or binocular vision loss or loss of visual field. Optic path tumors may present a thickening of the nerves, and we believe that warrants the image identification of tumors in the above two positions.

7. Discussion

The term ganglioglioma, first referred to by Perkins in 1926 and popularized by Courville in 1930, is used to describe a type of central nervous system tumor containing astrocytic and neuronal components, the pathogenesis of which is unknown. According to a statistical analysis of 326 ganglioglioma cases, the mean age of onset in the 279 ganglioglioma grade I tumors was 22.1 ± 11.2 years old, 30 grade II ganglioglioma cases had a similar age distribution, and in 17 anaplastic gangliogliomas (WHO grade III), the mean age was approximately 35 ± 14.5 years old [1]. The main symptom of gangliogliomas in the temporal lobe is refractory epilepsy [36], while in other parts, it is generally caused by focal nerve compression or increased intracranial pressure [4,9,10,26,34]. Infratentorial GGs may present with cerebellar signs, cranial nerve deficits, or, rarely, increased ICP [37]. Intracranial GGs are most commonly found in the temporal lobe, but rarely in the pituitary gland, pituitary stalk, optic pathway, hypothalamus, ventricle, and spinal cord. Most GGs grow slowly and have clear boundaries, cystic components, and calcifications. GGs are generally classified as WHO grade Ia, and some GGs have anaplastic features and are considered to be grade III ganglioglioma (anaplastic GG). If the tumor contains mitosis, necrosis, and microvascular proliferation, it is generally a WHO grade IV ganglioglioma with glioblastoma changes [38]. Histopathologically, the admixture of neoplastic cells and abnormal ganglion cells is the diagnostic marker; ganglion cells can be identified by the presence of Nissl substance and large nucleoli [39]. It is known that ganglion cells or neurons in GGs are dysplastic due to cellular disorganization, subcortical localization, aggregation, and the accumulation of giant cells and Nissl substance around the membrane [1]. Immunohistochemistry staining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100 protein, and neuronal markers (Neun, Syn) helps to identify neuronal and glial cell populations. The semi-quantitative assessment of the Ki-67 labeling index helps characterize the biological behavior of the tumors [39]. A study found that the expression of CD34 in GGs may be related to the location of the tumor, and the staining in temporal lobe lesions was mostly positive for CD34, while in other rare sites it was mostly negative [1]. Generally, low-grade GGs have a low Ki-67 index (<1%), without p53 mutations. Tumors with high levels of p53 mutations and a Ki-67 index generally have anaplastic features, which may suggest high-grade features [40].
On imaging, GGs can be divided into cystic tumors (more than a 90% cystic component), cystic solid tumors (cystic component 10–90%), and solid tumors (cystic component less than 10%), of which cystic tumors account for about 44–80% [41]. In the MRI images, GGs generally present an iso-intense signal or a slightly hypo-intense signal on T1-weighted images, and a hyperintense signa in T2-weighted images. Generally, there is no peritumoral edema. When an edema occurs, it generally indicates a malignant lesion [42]. About half of GGs show an enhancement in MRI images after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection, and the degree of enhancement is inhomogeneous. It usually appears as a low-density lesion on the CT, with varying degrees of enhancement or calcification [43].
Generally, GGs present a slow-growing trend, and their clinical manifestations are slow. Surgical resection generally leads to good prognosis. In general, on the premise of preserving the integrity of neurologic function, a total tumor resection should be considered to be of the utmost priority. However, since the suprasellar region has a complex structure and is close to important blood vessels and nerves, biopsy has become an alternative method. According to the data, the 10-year survival rate of these patients after total tumor resection is 82–93% [44]. We believe that GG is also characterized by a low recurrence rate. According to the statistics of Professor Blümcke et al., among the 86 patients diagnosed with ganglioglioma (WHO grade I), only 1 patient relapsed after 7 years of follow-up, and no tumor recurrence was recorded in the 19 patients we counted [1]. Upon admission, patients can choose between craniotomy and transnasal endoscopic surgery, especially in the case of our study. The principal reason that we chose to perform transnasal endoscopic surgery was that it can better expose the important structure surrounding the tumor. Second, it is minimally invasive and scarless, and allows direct entry to the skull base. No manipulation of neurovascular structures is required. In addition, the transnasal approach allows us to obtain a good view of the hypothalamus and other structures. In comparison to traditional craniotomy, the incidence of brain injury and cerebrovascular accident is significantly lower, but cerebrospinal fluid leakage is more likely to occur [45]. For GGs that can be enhanced on preoperative MRI, some literature studies suggest that better results can be obtained with fluorescein-guided surgery, whether surgical resection or surgical biopsy [46]. Therefore, during the operation, we used artificial dura mater and a vascularized pedicle nasoseptal flap to repair the bottom structure of the sella, thus reduced the chance of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. We believe that endoscopic transnasal surgery is a better option. Currently, there is still no clear evidence supporting the need for adjuvant therapy following surgery for GGs. However, certain data show that adjuvant radiotherapy can prolong the interval of recurrence, although it does not improve the overall survival rate [47]. In addition, chemotherapy has also been applied for this type of tumor. In our literature review, Vajramani et al. [13] used temozolomide for chemotherapeutic purposes, and Spennato et al. [16] used temozolomide and imatinib. We cannot form a conclusion due to the limited results.

8. Conclusions

Ganglioglioma is a rare intracranial tumor occurring in adults and anywhere in the central nerve system; it occurs more often in the temporal lobe and is rarer in the suprasellar regions. A gross total surgical resection should be performed as first-choice treatment. Histopathological examinations play an important role in the precise diagnosis of these tumors. In the present study, we reported the first suprasellar ganglioglioma originating from the third ventricle floor, which was resected via transsphenoidal endoscopy and the patient showed good prognosis.

Author Contributions

S.L. (Shaoguang Li) wrote the manuscript. Y.X. wrote the manuscript and offered some information on the case. S.L. (Shaoguang Li) and Y.X. contributed equally to the manuscript. G.H., S.L. (Shigang Lv), P.S. and H.G. provided assistance in the writing of the manuscript and offered some information on the case. L.W. designed and supervised the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the JiangXi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20192BAB205077) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82160153).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (protocol code “Review [2022] No. (008)” and date of approval “19 January 2022”).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate the assistance and technical support offered by the Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blümcke, I.; Wiestler, O.D. Gangliogliomas: An intriguing tumor entity associated with focal epilepsies. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2002, 61, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Nabors, L.B.; Portnow, J.; Ahluwalia, M.; Baehring, J.; Brem, H.; Brem, S.; Butowski, N.; Campian, J.L.; Clark, S.W.; Fabiano, A.J.; et al. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2020, 18, 1537–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gliomas (2018 edition). Chin. J. Neurosurg. 2019, 03, 217–239.
  4. Sugiyama, K.; Goishi, J.; Sogabe, T.; Uozumi, T.; Hotta, T.; Kiya, K. Ganglioglioma of the optic pathway. A case report. Surg. Neurol. 1992, 37, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pastor, L.; Iglesias, S.; Ros, B.; Weil, B.; Martínez-León, M.I.; Arráez, M.Á. Suprasellar ganglioglioma presenting as a middle cerebral artery infarction. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2019, 35, 1625–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gupta, R.; Suri, V.; Arora, R.; Sharma, M.C.; Mishra, S.; Singh, M.; Sarkar, C. Suprasellar ganglioglioma presenting with diabetes insipidus in a young boy: A rare clinical presentation. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2010, 26, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shuangshoti, S.; Kirsch, E.; Bannan, P.; Fabian, V.A. Ganglioglioma of the optic chiasm: Case report and review of the literature. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000, 21, 1486–1489. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nguyen, K.D.; Waitt, T.; Alleyne, C.H., Jr. Sellar/Suprasellar Ganglioglioma: Clinical Image. World Neurosurg. 2019, 132, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chilton, J.; Caughron, M.R.; Kepes, J.J. Ganglioglioma of the optic chiasm: Case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1990, 26, 1042–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bergin, D.J.; Johnson, T.E.; Spencer, W.H.; McCord, C.D. Ganglioglioma of the optic nerve. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1988, 105, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sugita, Y.; Sawada, M.; Munemitsu, T.; Higashi, T.; Hojo, M. Discrepancy between radiological and histological findings in ganglioglioma of the optic chasm: Case report. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2017, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Karaaslan, B.; Uçar, M.; Kulduk, G.; Börcek, A.Ö.; Baykaner, M.K. Bilateral Optic Pathway Ganglioglioma: The Fifth Case in the Literature. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2016, 51, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vajramani, G.V.; Dambatta, S.; Walker, M.; Grundy, P.L. Multiple gangliogliomas of the optic pathway. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2006, 20, 428–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, G.T.; Galetta, S.L.; Rorke, L.B.; Bilaniuk, L.T.; Vojta, D.D.; Molloy, P.T.; Phillips, P.C.; Needle, M.; Duhaime, A.C.; Sutton, L.N.; et al. Gangliogliomas involving the optic chiasm. Neurology 1996, 46, 1669–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lu, W.Y.; Goldman, M.; Young, B.; Davis, D.G. Optic nerve ganglioglioma. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1993, 78, 979–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Spennato, P.; Giordano, M.; Ruggiero, C.; Aliberti, F.; Buonocore, M.C.; Nastro, A.; D’Onofrio, V.; Bifani, D.; Cinalli, G. Optic pathway ganglioglioma with intraventricular cyst. J. Neurooncol. 2011, 102, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abuzayed, B.; Alawneh, K.; Al-Qawasmeh, M.; Al-Khatib, S.; Barukba, M.; Raffee, L. Ganglioglioma of optic chiasma: A case report and review of literature. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2020, 11, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jalali, R.; Deopujari, C.E.; Bhutani, R.; Suhas, U.; Rajasekharan, P.; Kane, S.V.; Gupta, T. Suprasellar ganglioglioma with unusual diffuse involvement of the entire optico-chiasmal hypothalamic pathway. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2008, 4, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pant, I.; Suri, V.; Chaturvedi, S.; Dua, R.; Kanodia, A.K. Ganglioglioma of optic chiasma: Case report and review of literature. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2006, 22, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rolston, J.D.; Han, S.J.; Cotter, J.A.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Aghi, M.K. Gangliogliomas of the optic pathway. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 21, 2244–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Albayrak, R.; Albayram, S.; Port, J.; Değirmenci, B.; Acar, M.; Yücel, A. Ganglioglioma of the right optic tract: Case report and review of the literature. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004, 22, 1047–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fehn, M.; Lohmann, F.; Lüdecke, D.K.; Rudorff, K.H.; Saeger, W. Ganglioglioma of the neurohypophysis with secretion of vasopressin. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 1998, 106, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hong, Y.; Fang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y. Ganglioglioma of the adenohypophysis mimicking pituitary adenoma: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018, 97, e11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Scheithauer, B.W.; Silva, A.I.; Parisi, J.E.; Kovacs, K.; Horvath, E. Ganglioglioma of the neurohypophysis. Endocr. Pathol. 2008, 19, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Omofoye, O.A.; Lechpammer, M.; Steele, T.O.; Harsh, G.R., 4th. Pituitary stalk gangliogliomas: Case report and literature review. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021, 201, 106405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hauck, E.F.; Vu, L.; Campbell, G.A.; Nauta, H.J. Intraventricular ganglioglioma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2008, 15, 1291–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shono, T.; Tosaka, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Onaka, S.; Yamaguchi, S.; Mizoguchi, M.; Iwaki, T.; Nakazato, Y.; Sasaki, T. Ganglioglioma in the third ventricle: Report on two cases. Neurosurg. Rev. 2007, 30, 253–258, discussion 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campos, A.R.; Biscoito, L.; Gasparinho, M.G. Intraventricular Ganglioglioma Presenting with Spontaneous Hemorrhage. Acta Med. Port. 2018, 31, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jaeger, M.; Hussein, S.; Schuhmann, M.U.; Brandis, A.; Samii, M.; Blömer, U. Intraventricular trigonal ganglioglioma arising from the choroid plexus. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 2001, 143, 953–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Majós, C.; Aguilera, C.; Ferrer, I.; López, L.; Pons, L.C. Intraventricular ganglioglioma: Case report. Neuroradiology 1998, 40, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harrison, W.; Elsamadicy, A.A.; McMahon, J.T.; Chagoya, G.; Sobel, R.A.; McLendon, R.E.; Adamson, C. Glioneuronal Tumor With Features of Ganglioglioma and Neurocytoma Arising in the Fourth Ventricle: A Report of 2 Unusual Cases and a Review of Infratentorial Gangliogliomas. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 78, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bhat, D.I.; Mahadevan, A.; Manish, R.; Sampath, S.; Chandramouli, B.A.; Shankar, S.K. Intraventricular ganglioglioma with bleed: A rare case report. Neurol India. 2010, 58, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. d’Andrea, G.; Sessa, G.; Ferrante, L. Ganglioglioma of the right lateral ventricle approached with neuronavigation and intraoperative DTI. Case report and literature review. Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 2011, 72, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yin Foo Lee, G.; Scott, G.; Blumbergs, P.C.; Patrick Brophy, B.; Lionel Crompton, J. Ganglioglioma of the lateral ventricle presenting with blepharospasm—Case report and review of the literature. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2001, 8, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Higa, N.; Yonezawa, H.; Oyoshi, T.; Hiraki, T.; Hirano, H.; Arita, K. Ganglioglioma in the Third Ventricle: A Case Report and Literature Review. NMC Case Rep. J. 2016, 3, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Huang, C.; Li, H.; Chen, M.; Si, Y.; Lei, D. Factors associated with preoperative and postoperative epileptic seizure in patients with cerebral ganglioglioma. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 30, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rana, R.; Perrillo, T.; Santoro, N.; Ortolani, F.; Messina, R.; Resta, M.; Perrucci, I.; Ingravallo, G.; Cazzato, G.; Grass, M.; et al. A Rare Case of Posterior Fossa Tumor and Central Precocious Puberty: Case Presentation and Review of the Literature. Neurol. Int. 2021, 13, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dash, R.C.; Provenzale, J.M.; McComb, R.D.; Perry, D.A.; Longee, D.C.; McLendon, R.E. Malignant supratentorial ganglioglioma (ganglion cell-giant cell glioblastoma): A case report and review of the literature. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1999, 123, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wolf, H.K.; Müller, M.B.; Spänle, M.; Zentner, J.; Schramm, J.; Wiestler, O.D. Ganglioglioma: A detailed histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 61 cases. Acta Neuropathol. 1994, 88, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fukushima, T.; Katayama, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Yoshino, A.; Komine, C.; Yokoyama, T. Aberrant TP53 protein accumulation in the neuronal component of ganglioglioma. J. Neurooncol. 2005, 72, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zentner, J.; Wolf, H.K.; Ostertun, B.; Hufnagel, A.; Campos, M.G.; Solymosi, L.; Schramm, J. Gangliogliomas: Clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings in 51 patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1994, 57, 1497–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Urbach, H. MRI of long-term epilepsy-associated tumors. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2008, 29, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, D.; Henning, T.D.; Zou, L.G.; Hu, L.B.; Wen, L.; Feng, X.Y.; Dai, S.H.; Wang, W.X.; Sun, Q.R.; Zhang, Z.G. Intracranial ganglioglioma: Clinicopathological and MRI findings in 16 patients. Clin. Radiol. 2008, 63, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Matsumoto, K.; Tamiya, T.; Ono, Y.; Furuta, T.; Asari, S.; Ohmoto, T. Cerebral gangliogliomas: Clinical characteristics, CT and MRI. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 1999, 141, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jeswani, S.; Nuño, M.; Wu, A.; Bonert, V.; Carmichael, J.D.; Black, K.L.; Chu, R.; King, W.; Mamelak, A.N. Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: A single-institution study. J. Neurosurg. 2016, 124, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Höhne, J.; Acerbi, F.; Falco, J.; Akçakaya, M.O.; Schmidt, N.O.; Kiris, T.; de Laurentis, C.; Ferroli, P.; Broggi, M.; Schebesch, K.-M. Lighting Up the Tumor-Fluorescein-Guided Resection of Gangliogliomas. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Compton, J.J.; Laack, N.N.; Eckel, L.J.; Schomas, D.A.; Giannini, C.; Meyer, F.B. Long-term outcomes for low-grade intracranial ganglioglioma: 30-year experience from the Mayo Clinic. J. Neurosurg. 2012, 117, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. MRI images. Preoperative MRI-enhanced T1 images show a slightly strengthened tumor located in the suprasellar region, behind the optic chiasm, and below the third ventricle; the pituitary gland and pituitary stalk are significantly enhanced (yellow arrows point to the tumor, white arrow points to the optic chiasm, red arrows point to the pituitary stalk, and blue arrows point to the third ventricle).
Figure 1. MRI images. Preoperative MRI-enhanced T1 images show a slightly strengthened tumor located in the suprasellar region, behind the optic chiasm, and below the third ventricle; the pituitary gland and pituitary stalk are significantly enhanced (yellow arrows point to the tumor, white arrow points to the optic chiasm, red arrows point to the pituitary stalk, and blue arrows point to the third ventricle).
Tomography 08 00238 g001
Figure 2. Endoscopic images during surgery. (A,B) Opening the dura mater at the bottom of the sella, a gray–white tumor (purple arrows) located behind the pituitary stalk (green arrows), and below the optic chiasm (yellow arrows). (C,D) Following the removal of the tumor, the third ventricle (blue arrow), oculomotor nerve (gray arrow), posterior cerebral artery (orange arrow), and basilar artery (black arrow) can be observed.
Figure 2. Endoscopic images during surgery. (A,B) Opening the dura mater at the bottom of the sella, a gray–white tumor (purple arrows) located behind the pituitary stalk (green arrows), and below the optic chiasm (yellow arrows). (C,D) Following the removal of the tumor, the third ventricle (blue arrow), oculomotor nerve (gray arrow), posterior cerebral artery (orange arrow), and basilar artery (black arrow) can be observed.
Tomography 08 00238 g002aTomography 08 00238 g002b
Figure 3. The pathological staining of tumors. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained section showing a large number of astrocytes (green arrows) and ganglion cells (yellow arrows) with large nucleoli were scattered. (B) The cytoplasm of glial cells shows positive staining for GFAP (black arrows). (C) A few NEUN-positive nuclei are visible (red arrows). (D) Syn staining reveals the positive cytoplasmic staining of neoplastic neurons (blue arrows).
Figure 3. The pathological staining of tumors. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained section showing a large number of astrocytes (green arrows) and ganglion cells (yellow arrows) with large nucleoli were scattered. (B) The cytoplasm of glial cells shows positive staining for GFAP (black arrows). (C) A few NEUN-positive nuclei are visible (red arrows). (D) Syn staining reveals the positive cytoplasmic staining of neoplastic neurons (blue arrows).
Tomography 08 00238 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Xiong, Y.; Hu, G.; Lv, S.; Song, P.; Guo, H.; Wu, L. Suprasellar Ganglioglioma Arising from the Third Ventricle Floor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Tomography 2022, 8, 2844-2853. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060238

AMA Style

Li S, Xiong Y, Hu G, Lv S, Song P, Guo H, Wu L. Suprasellar Ganglioglioma Arising from the Third Ventricle Floor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Tomography. 2022; 8(6):2844-2853. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060238

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shaoguang, Yuanyuan Xiong, Guowen Hu, Shigang Lv, Pingan Song, Hua Guo, and Lei Wu. 2022. "Suprasellar Ganglioglioma Arising from the Third Ventricle Floor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature" Tomography 8, no. 6: 2844-2853. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060238

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop