Next Article in Journal
How Personality Traits and Professional Skepticism Affect Auditor Quality? A Quantitative Model
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties and Antiaging Properties of Bitumen Mastic Modified by Layered Double Hydroxides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Personal and Emotional Values Embedded in Thai-Consumers’ Perceptions: Key Factors for the Sustainability of Traditional Confectionery Businesses

1
The Business School, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK
2
Faculty of Society and Industry, The Open University of Japan, Chiba 261-8586, Japan
3
Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Hearing and Balance Disorder, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo 152-0021, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(2), 1548; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021548
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023

Abstract

:
The confectionery market in Thailand is being overpowered by Western confectioneries. This study proposes and verifies a model of the factors that define consumer behaviour towards traditional Thai confectioneries and consumer willingness to support them. In recent years, there has been a boom in posting various aspects of Thai youth culture, including confectionery, on social networking services (SNS), especially Instagram. In major Thai cities, such as Bangkok, stores are being built with ‘Insta-image’ in mind, strengthening the younger generation’s inclination towards Western confectionery. Under these circumstances, the share of traditional confectioneries, which have long been familiar to Thai people, is declining. Based on survey data collected from 400 consumers in Bangkok, we designed a model to analyse the antecedent factors for consumers’ purchase intention and support behaviour for Thai traditional confectioneries, such as the word-of-mouth (WOM) approach and repeated purchase. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was conducted on the dataset to examine the antecedent factors’ impact on purchase intention and supportive actions. The results revealed that four latent factors, as determining antecedents of purchase intentions, had a significant impact on purchase intentions, resulting in loyalty and word-of-mouth behaviour. Among the determining factors, personal feelings and attachment to traditional confectionery were found to have the greatest impact, surpassing subjective norms. To expand the fan base of Thai traditional confectioneries and to support their businesses, appealing to the value of traditional confectioneries, nostalgic value and long-held Thai personal feelings to support traditional confectionery was found to be an effective marketing strategy for corporates. Such efforts are also meaningful in terms of maintaining the diversity of food culture in the face of increasing Westernisation and a decrease in unique food ingredients and food culture. Furthermore, according to this analysis, willingness to purchase is strongly linked to purchasing behaviour, and the cultivation and securing of loyal customers and their WOM recommendations are important for developing a customer base in the market. WOM recommendations by consumers can activate communication among customers and companies in the market, strengthen the community and stimulate the dissemination of information about traditional confectioneries. This study is expected to be a useful and valuable resource for the development of marketing strategies to ensure the sustainability of traditional confectionery in the Thai sweets market.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background of the Study

This study investigates the case of Thailand’s confectionery sector, which has been competing with Western sweets. Traditional Thai sweets have been part of Thai culture for a long time, and the younger generation still loves traditional sweets. However, similar to other sectors of commodities and food, the spread of Western-style products has increased their share of the markets, and the number of traditional sweets shops and stalls has gradually declined [1]. The current market situation has raised the issue of how to sustain a traditional local confectionery businesses in the competitive market.

1.2. Research Rationale and Aim

This study aims to develop actionable implications for the subject of how to sustain the traditional confectionery sector, which has been under a competitive pressure from Western brands, and, in so doing, this study aimed to examine the behavioural patterns and attitudes of consumers towards sweets in the Thai market. The Thai people are known for their sweet tooth; however, with the recent rise in Western brand confectionaries due to globalisation, the consumption of traditional Thai confectionaries are being overwhelmed by Western confectionaries. In this study, using quantitative research methods, we examined the reasons for the consumption behaviour and consumer preferences of traditional Thai confectionery and attempted to present basic data for the planning of effective marketing strategies.
In recent years, especially in Thai youth culture, there has been a boom in the use of social networking services (SNS), such as Instagram, to communicate about various aspects, including confectionery. In large cities, such as Bangkok, shops are being built with Instagram in mind. It has been pointed out that this situation has spurred the popularity of Western confectionery and that the share of traditional confectionery, which has been familiar to Thai citizens for many years, is declining. In addition, the introduction of measures to revive the traditional confectionery sector, which has been deeply rooted in, and familiar to, Thai society for many years, is awaited [1]. Therefore, the research aims to examine the current Thai consumers selection behaviour between traditional of modern sweets to find key issues to sustain a balanced diversity in the confectionery sector.
In this study, based on survey data collected from 400 consumers in Bangkok, we designed a model to decipher the reasons for the preferences and evaluation aspects of Thai traditional confectionery in the consciousness of modern consumers through structural equation modelling (SEM). An empirical analysis was conducted to propose basic data for the relevant sector.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Purchase Intention and Antecedent Factors

Studying consumer behaviour helps to improve or develop products or services to become more effective. Additionally, the consumer behaviour model by [2] has been used to explain how many factors can influence consumption stimulus and which relevant aspects are affected. It has been found that psychological and social factors are the most dominant factors influencing customers’ willingness to buy [3].
Customers repurchase a product after they have perceived the product’s adequate value and its ability to respond to their needs and fulfil their expectations. Basically, purchase intention is more focused on customers’ attitudes than other tools, such as demographics or economic factors. However, purchase intention concerns feelings and cognition, as it will be difficult to change the attitude if a certain attitude has been established in the consumer. It has been argued that the influence of social connections and reputation has a higher impact on consumers’ attitudes [4]. It is also discussed that customer satisfaction is a factor associated with purchase intention [5]. It acts as a mediator between itself and purchase intention and can occur in purchasing actions.

2.2. Certification Programmes Impact

The theory of reasoned action (TRA) aims to explain the relationship between attitudes and behaviour. It is mainly used to predict how individuals will behave based on their existing attitudes and behavioural intentions and is the analytical model of this research.
The TRA framework is simple and is based on the concept that whether an individual will take a particular action or not is determined by the consequences that would result from taking that action. It was proposed that it has become the basis for much empirical research in social sciences, building on earlier work, such as the persuasion model and attitude theory [6].
Although the relationship between attitude and behaviour (A–B relationship) was suggested earlier, the TRA was proposed with the intention of proving that attitude is an indicator of human behaviour. Later, to resolve the contradiction of the A–B relationship with the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the reasoned action approach to behaviour (RAA), the two authors repeatedly extended and verified the model. Subsequently, this model has been used by many scholars as a pillar of empirical analysis, especially in marketing [7].
The main purpose of the TRA is to understand individuals’ behaviour by examining their basic motivations for performing behaviours [8]. The TRA states that a person’s intention to perform a behaviour is the main predictor of whether or not that person will actually perform the behaviour [9]. In other words, in view of this model and the theme of this study, there is a focus on whether the intention to purchase traditional Thai sweets leads to actual purchase behaviour. As the antecedents that define people’s purchase intentions, social and subjective norms surrounding the behaviour of purchasing traditional sweets may also be related to consumers’ actual intentions and behaviours. Thus, the TRA emphasises the relationship between intentions and the consequences of actual behaviour [10]. It was demonstrated through Turkish data that a discrepancy exists between consumers’ intentions regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) (i.e., intentions that CSR is desirable and that they want to support companies that promote CSR) and their actual behaviour of purchasing products from companies that contribute to CSR [11].
Thus, intention (in this study, the intention to purchase traditional Thai sweets) has important theoretical implications because it is determined by attitudes and subjective norms towards behaviour [12]. In the next section, we will examine the purchase intention derived from the three factors hypothetically prepared by this study. The TRA states that the stronger the intention, the greater the effort to carry out the action and the more likely it is that the action will be carried out. This relationship will be discussed by focusing on the size and significance of the path coefficient between purchase intention and action through quantitative analysis, as described in the next section.

2.3. Antecedent Factors Leading to Purchase Intention

2.3.1. Functional Value

Functional value is the perceived functional utility based on a product feature provided to the customer. In this context, it may become a main point that can explain why customers choose to consume one product over another. It was also discussed that the benefits correlated with price, performance and reliability that lead to a purchase are generally considered for functional value [13]. For instance, proposed nutrition and hedonic factors should be key elements for functional value for food [14], whereas the effect of cause-related marketing on consumers’ food purchase intention was also investigated [15,16]. These studies suggested the potential of impact of a quality certificate, which could indicate the good function value of food.
With regard to the functional aspects of confectionery, as mentioned above, previous studies have already shown that factors such as nutritional value, price and appearance influence purchasing behaviour. Therefore, with regard to the first element of the model for analysis, the latent variable of functional aspects, we referred to the discussions of [17,18] and decided to include functional aspects and attributes that would influence purchasing behaviour in our analysis.

2.3.2. Epistemic Value

Epistemic value, gained from consuming a product that provides a desire for knowledge and induces curiosity, is generally provided through something new. Moreover, the behaviour of looking for a selection appears to be the tendency of innovative purchase. It can, then, be assumed that Thais may be used to consuming traditional Thai desserts; thus, turning to Western desserts’ is becoming another alternative. Epistemic values should be investigated while researching consumption values and behaviour [19,20]: food consumption values and their leading effect on real buying behaviour have been examined. Ethical consumption intentions and real buying choice in the context of organic food seems to be one of the popular topics in the field [21], and it has been suggested consumers’ environmental concerns have an impact on physical buying behaviour as a moderating effect. In line with this discussion, the impact of consumers’ epistemic value on young consumers purchasing behaviour is another popular topic for further study [22].

2.3.3. Personal and Emotional Value

Emotional value is obtained by purchasing a product that induces feelings or affective states [23]. In terms of consumption preferences, this value may arise in both positive and negative ways, such as excitement, loyalty, guilt and fear [13]. The impacts of consumers’ emotional values in purchasing behaviour can be discussed in contrast to consumers’ logical choice behaviour [24,25]: this aspect might have been influenced by the consumers’ mental health with learning experiences. It is also emphasised the food consumption is impacted by consumers’ quality of life, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic [26]. Investigation into relationships between lifestyles and food consumption behaviour with a focus on consumers’ mental condition and well-being seems to have become more popular in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era [27]. the impact of consumption values on consumers’ purchase of organic food has also been discussed, with a focus on consumers’ environmental perceptions [28], and the emphasis on the impact of personal and emotional value in food choice has been discussed to develop actionable implications for industries.
Another element of personal and emotional value in consumer confectionery purchasing behaviour that perhaps should not be overlooked is the country-of-origin (COO) factor. This COO continues to constitute an important discussion point in various studies in consumer choice behaviour; however, the Thai sweets covered by this study are assumed to be traditional confectioneries where all ingredients and manufacturing processes are also carried out in Thailand, and there are no plans to include discussion of COO at this point in time. However, in a discussion highlighting the competition between traditional products and confectionery imports from the West, etc. in an increasingly globalised confectionery market, this issue is considered to have important implications. Therefore, the memorandum here is a reminder to add that the COO element is an important theme in commodity purchasing research [29,30].

2.3.4. Subjective Norm

A subjective norm is ‘an individual’s perception that people who are important to him or her believe that the behaviour in question should be done’ [6]. Subjective norms represent a person’s feelings about the social pressures they feel about a particular behaviour [31].
According to the TRA, people have certain beliefs or normative beliefs about whether a behaviour is acceptable or not [32]. These beliefs shape a person’s perception of a behaviour and determine their intention regarding whether to perform that behaviour or not [15]. For example, if a Thai consumer believes that the social group to which he or she belongs encourages the purchase of domestic traditional sweets, then he or she is more likely to want to engage in that activity. Subjective norms also consider people’s motivations to conform to the views and perceptions of social groups, which vary according to the situation and individual motivations [33]. Various studies have shown influential positive relationship between subjective norms and product purchase intentions [34,35,36,37].
Exploration into the antecedents of consumers’ purchase intentions in emerging countries reveals a focus on sustainability and subjective norms [28,38]. Discussion of buying behaviour in the context of personal perceived values and subjective norms implied the impact of food values in line with consumers’ subjective norm and brand loyalty [39,40]. These studies examined the influencing factors of consumers’ purchasing behaviour from health concerns as a peer-group pressure. Based on these recent discussions, this study extends these findings and analytical model to the purchasing behaviour of traditional sweets in Thailand and examines the role of subjective norms in this context.

2.4. Intention to Behaviour

Another discussion point has been investigating the relation between purchase intention and purchasing behaviour. As we discussed above, the antecedents for consumers’ purchase intention have been studied in the context of various goods and services, whereas examination of influential factors in the context of COVID-19 on ethical-food purchase intentions and analyses of the difference in consumers’ intention–behaviour gap suggested implications for the field of study [41,42,43]. Recent studies discussed the intention and behaviour gap based on the theory of planned behaviour, with a focus on the moderating roles of communication, satisfaction, and trust in the food sector, and, finally, consumer purchasing behaviour of organic food in an emerging market has been discussed, suggesting their purchase intention and purchasing behaviour might transition to another stage in the course of economic development [44].

2.5. Behaviour Has a Significant Impact on Loyalty

The most important factors affecting customer loyalty are customer satisfaction and service quality, both directly and indirectly. In addition, according to these, a strong relationship exists between loyalty and satisfaction for consumers who perceive high value [45,46]. How to build loyalty through perceived values has been explored, with a focus on WOM.
It is not a common approach to discuss the direction from purchasing behaviour to loyalty. While there are various definitions of loyalty, [47] examined antecedents and effects of loyalty on food purchasing in the context of sustainability, and the relationship between local food experiences and behavioural intention via satisfaction was validated [48]. Consumers’ attachment with retail stores has been discussed by examining antecedents and impact on patronage intentions [49]. These recent studies imply that purchasing behaviour and consumers’ loyalty perceptions are interactively related and loyalty is fostered and strengthened by synergistic effects, and should be viewed as a double helix structure, so to speak. Based on this discussion, this study focuses on the relationship between purchase behaviour evoked by intention and loyalty.

2.6. Behaviour Has a Significant Impact on Word of Mouth

To date, communication tools, such as WOM, play a large role in shaping consumers’ buying behaviours and their attitudes [50]. It has been discussed that the degree of effectiveness can depend on the personal characteristics of the WOM spreader [51]. Positive WOM reflects a prospective future consumption; [52,53] investigated drivers of the purchasing behaviour of products with a focus on WOM and consumers’ perceived value of sustainability. The impact of opinion leadership in the information communication age, and, eventually, online WOM has been examined for its impact on consumers’ buying behaviour on the platform of digital apps, which have been another popular topic for researchers [54,55].
Thus, the spreading of information through WOM by existing customers is becoming a key contributor to other customers’ future expectations, which could lead to diversified food choices based on their own perceptions and intentions to compromise their loyalty. Throughout interactions with other loyal customers, each customer will construct their own tendencies and preferences for a variety of sustained confectionery sector.

2.7. Loyalty Has a Significant Impact on Word of Mouth

The final relationship in the model is loyalty and its impact on WOM [56], and it has been discussed that customer loyalty is increased by WOM, especially in the specific context of the time, such as ambiguity and terror; this discussion can be applied to consumer behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic [57]. The role of brand love with a focus on social-media promotion and E-WOM online shopping space has also been investigated, in line with accumulated knowledge and experiences [58]. The synergetic effect of after-sales service and loyalty, which can be also increased by WOM, results in repurchase behaviour. Therefore, the relationship between loyalty and WOM is included in the analytical model.

2.8. Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses

Globalisation has transformed the food environment in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), affecting diet and nutrition. However, to date, most food environment assessments and, to a lesser extent, analyses of food choice behaviour have been developed for use in high-income countries, so there has not been a significant body of research modelling informal and formal consumer food choices. The authos orf [59] examined 113 data-collection assessments (methods, tools, and metrics) for eight aspects of the food market environment and whether they are consistent with the market realities in low- and middle-income countries, but they further suggested some more detailed analysis would be needed to analyse the impact on emotional factors embedded in the consumer mind-set, and other psychological aspects.
In addition to assessing multiple aspects of the food market environment, including food quality, ingredient reliability, marketing, and regulation, this study also focused on ensuring the sustainability of diverse food cultures in an LMIC context, to support global diet, nutrition, and health, as well as the diversity and balanced development of the Thai confectionery market as a middle-income country. Factors supporting the development of a diverse and balanced development are examined in the light of consumer awareness data. As a result, the proposed model and measurements are practical guidepost for further discussion of food diversity, market trends, and consumers’ evaluative perspectives, not only in high-income countries but also in low- and middle-income markets [59].
From the discussions, a conceptual model with hypotheses has been developed, as shown in Figure 1, which includes key issues and sustainable elements for Thai traditional confectioneries which have been losing ground.
Table 1 presents a summary of the hypotheses built on the relevant academic discussions related to each hypothesis.

3. Methodology

3.1. Data Collection

This study adopts a quantitative approach to examining consumer behaviour in Thailand. Survey data collected from 400 consumers living in Bangkok were analysed using SEM. The survey was conducted online by convenience sampling, aiming at 400. The questionnaire consisted of questions corresponding to the hypotheses in the previous section and the demographic data of the respondents. After data cleaning, 400 samples were finalised.

3.2. Analysis

The data collected were subjected to descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis using the Cronbach’ alpha test to check the reliability of the four antecedent factors corresponding to the analytical model, and correlation tests for each factor, followed by SEM analysis to examine the validity of the model and the relationship between each latent factor.
Notably, the main question was designed with a five-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). SPSS v26 and AMOS v26 were used to analyse the data to test the hypotheses, with practical implications for relevant researchers and practitioners. Through this analytical approach, it was hoped to reveal critical essences to support the competitiveness of traditional confectionery.

3.3. Survey Design

Following a pilot test that was carried out with eight volunteers, some modifications were made to the wording and the questioning style before launching the main survey. The survey was conducted using a web-based online format, which allowed us to collect primary data from Bangkok, Thailand. The questions and corresponding options used in this research were carefully defined based on the key findings from the academic sources discussed in the previous sections, following the model shown in Figure 1. The original survey questions were prepared in English and, thereafter, a bilingual individual translated them into Thai. A second bilingual individual, who had not seen the original questions, subsequently back translated the items into English before a third bilingual individual checked the translations. Throughout this process, any inconsistencies that emerged were reviewed and resolved to finalise the questionnaire (Appendix A). This procedure was carried out to ensure the cultural and language equivalency of the scales being used [60,61].

4. Findings and Analysis

4.1. Data Profile and Descriptive Analysis

The collected data are presented in Table 2 with demographic information. Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics of the observed variables for purchase intention for Thai suites.

4.2. Factor Analysis and Reliability Test

A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with 21 and 8 questions; the obtained results are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Table 4 demonstrates four factors were generated: personal and emotional value (alpha = 0.816), subjective norm (alpha = 0.829), functional value (alpha = 0.767) and epistemic value (alpha = 0.824). These generated factors were validated using the results of the Cronbach’s alpha test. All alpha values were higher than 0.6, which implies that the attained factors were acceptable [62].
The same procedure of factor analysis was conducted with the right-hand side of the analytical model which generated the three factors demonstrated in Table 5.
Next, we confirmed that the latent factors generated from factor analysis were suitable for the SEM analysis using convergent and discriminant validity tests.

4.3. Convergent and Discriminant Validity Tests

To check the validity of the data set, a convergent and discriminant validity test were conducted. As shown in Table 6, the correlations range from 0.516 to 0.591, which indicates no multi-correlation issues [63]. On the Cronbach alpha test, personal value (0.816), subjective norm (0.829), functional value (0.769) and epistemic value (0.824) are all above 0.7, meaning that the data is assumed to be reliable [62]. Values bolded on the main diagonal are the square root of AVEs >0.5; hence, it is possible to explain these factors [64]. Similarly, the result of behavioural factors’ analysis is shown in Table 7.
These were estimated and are presented in both Table 6 and Table 7. For instance, most of the examined values are greater than the accepted lowest values of CR and AVE, which are 0.7 [65] and 0.5 [66]. Therefore, it can be confirmed that all values have met the relevant requirements, and the overall outcome implies that the constructs are reliable, consistent, and valid [64].
Regarding the discriminant validity test result, if the square root of the AVE of each construct, or the average variance (AV), is found to be greater than the Pearson correlation coefficient of that construct with other constructs, then it can be concluded that discriminant validity is corroborated. We computed AVs and Pearson correlation coefficients as demonstrated in Table 6 and Table 7. It was confirmed that the Cronbach’s alpha of each construct also indicates that each construct is consistent, as the values of the Cronbach’s alpha of each construct are greater than the lowest acceptable value of 0.6 [67]. Constructs so identified are said to be consistent. Correlation analysis is useful for detecting the existence of a covariant among relevant factors that constitute the SEM. As high correlation indicates multicollinearity among variables, the correlation coefficients would ideally not be higher than 0.7 [68]. As shown in Table 6 and Table 7, the factors are confirmed to be suitable for SEM analysis.
From the results of the tests above, the data can be confirmed to be eligible for the next step, which is a SEM analysis.

4.4. SEM Analysis to Test the Factors’ Impact on Purchase Intention

Following the data-cleaning process, the sample size was 400, which resulted in a high goodness of fit for the model. Figure 2 shows that all four latent factors have a significant impact on purchase intention. In addition, the model is compatible with the dataset, as its GFI is high enough (0.921 > 0.90). These scores show that the SEM is an appropriate result.
Other parameters, such as RMSEA (0.0079 < 0.08), AGFI (0.909 > 0.90) and CFI (0.913 > 0.90), imply that this model was appropriately structured for application to the dataset (Hair, 2011). Pass coefficients of the four latent factors to purchase intention are as follows: ‘functional value’ (0.174) is not significant; next are ‘epistemic value’ (0.173 1fix), ‘personal and emotional value’ (p < 0.493 **) and ‘subjective norm (p < 0.343 ***).
It is observed that ‘purchase intention’ to ‘behaviour’ has p < 0.942 ***, which means those relationships are very tight. Additionally, ‘behaviour’ splits into two: the first is ‘loyalty’ (0.937 1fix), and the second is ‘WOM’ (p < 0.936 ***). Consequently, ‘loyalty’ leans towards ‘WOM’ (p < 0.271 ***). As we mentioned in the note that *** means p < 0.001, ** means p < 0.01, and * means p < 0.05, this shows the coefficient value is fixed as 1.
In order to check the goodness of fit judgments obtained here more precisely, attention was paid to SRMR (standardised root mean square residual), an indicator that removes the influence of differences in data units through standardisation. This means that the reported value of RMSEA is very close to the limit of model acceptance, so in the absence of CI for RMSEA and RMSR, it is hard to decide about actual GFI and AGFI is often above the required level for models not fitting the data well. SRMR is easy to consider as a reference guide because it is a standardised indicator, with a value below 0.05 being interpreted as very good fitting level, while it is acceptable when it is lower than 0.1. However, as a highly effective and reasonable value, it is possible to judge the fit to be good if it is less than 0.08 [69]. On this basis, the SRMR of this model, as measured by AMOS, is less than 0.08 (<0.07), which meets this criterion, and, therefore, the fit of this model is judged to be sufficiently high.
Table 8 shows that details of the estimate values of each path and the significant impact among latent factors and observed elements.

4.5. Discussion

The results of this study showed that there is a strong relationship between intention and behaviour, and that the top two influencing factors, personal feelings and social norms, have a negative impact on purchasing behaviour. In other words, functional aspects such as nutritional value, palatability, and quality of ingredients, which were assumed to be valid factors, did not have much influence on decision making and purchase behaviour. On the contrary, highly emotional aspects play a role in determining the purchase of traditional confectioneries. This indicates that consumer valorisation and attitudes have a significant impact on the purchase of confectioneries.
In a model in which attitudes dictate behaviour, i.e., attitudinal factors influence the act of purchasing traditional confectionery, this study focused on four factors: three hypothetical factors and one subjective norm. As discussed, subjective norms in the context of the research topic are responses to the expectation that purchasing traditional confections is expected by others and should be continued. Subjective norms have been discussed as an important determinant of behavioural intentions and refer to the perceptions of relevant groups and individuals, such as family, friends, and peers, which influence the performance of one’s behaviour based on social pressure [70]. Based on the results of this study, social pressure, emotional attachment, and a personal “sense of obligation” may, in fact, meaningfully influence the purchase of traditional Tendo confectionery. Attitudes towards traditional sweets can be significant driving forces leading to purchase intention, which urges buying activities in the market.
Similar to this finding, significantly, of the three antecedents prepared, the personal emotional factor shows the greatest impact with regard to traditional Thai-confectionery purchasing behaviour. The respondents of this survey, Thai consumers, have a strong emotional attachment to their personal traditional confectionery: personal memory value and emotional attachment, along with subjective norms. This aspect may provide a valid and important guideline for supporting confectioneries that embody unique and distinctive national culture, for developing effective marketing strategies from the perspective of preserving food and culture diversity amid globalisation and maintaining the prevalence of Western food ingredients and global food culture.

5. Conclusions

5.1. Imlications

Concerning the main objective of this research, which is to investigate the differences in Thai consumers’ perceptions and purchase behaviours regarding traditional Thai and Western sweets, more in-depth analysis needs to be conducted. As mentioned in the introduction, the research results presented here are at the pilot level, and the analytical framework needs to be refined based on the findings of previous studies in the food sector [71].
The tentative analytical model used here also indicates a strong relationship between purchase intention and purchasing behaviour. Furthermore, the results suggest that consumers, along with favourable WOM, show a willingness to stick to traditional confectioneries as repeat customers as a result of evoked purchasing behaviour.
This indicates that the younger generation still respects traditional values and supports a diverse sweet market rather than being solely devoted to Western confectioneries, even after Thai sweets have been overtaken by Western confectioneries in the market.

5.2. Limitations and Further Research Opportunities

As noted above, in the process of substantiating the hypothetical model, this study was combined with the proposal of a scale that would be useful for further analysis. We recognize the need for further development of the research results presented here in order to produce a more robust contribution.
First, we plan to elaborate on the model and re-evaluate the scale to closely examine consumer purchasing behaviour, which may have undergone further transformation after the COVID-19 era. To do so, we need to conduct an empirical study based on a larger data set collected from other markets that are also middle-income countries. Second, the models and measurements tested in this study will be compared using data sets from different markets, including emerging, developing, and developed markets, to discuss the determinants of consumer attitudes and behaviours in each market. Third, the literature review suggests that the nature of the relationships between factors may not be as simple as the research design of the study. For example, the possibility that behaviour and loyalty are interrelated cannot be ruled out. Similarly, if WoM and behaviour influence each other, this bidirectionality should be interpreted in future research agendas. Therefore, it is envisaged that the next stage of the project will be to analyse this issue when conducting a deep dive into consumer behaviour and attitudes based on qualitative methods. Moreover, we are expecting the use of qualitative research methods will help us in gaining a better and more accurate understanding of the analysed phenomena. By doing so, we hope to further strengthen and generalise the output of this research, to be more in-depth and to provide clearer answers to the questions of ‘what’, ‘where’, ‘how’ and ‘why’. The methodology will contribute to further extend the scope of this research and enable the results and findings obtained to be deployed in other market contexts and to provide guidance for more specific business strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, H.O. (Hiroko Oe) and Y.Y.; methodology, H.O. (Hiroko Oe) and Y.Y.; data curation, Y.Y.; pilot data analysis with NVivo ver26, H.O. (Hiroko Oe) and Y.Y.; formal analysis, H.O. (Hiroko Oe) and Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.O. (Hiroko Oe); writing—review and editing, Y.Y. and H.O. (Hiroko Oe); visualisation, H.O. (Hiroko Oe) and Y.Y.; project administration, H.O. (Hiroko Oe); supervision, H.O. (Hiroko Ochiai); open-access fee arrangement, H.O. (Hiroko Ochiai). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Sub-committee (Industry & Society) of the Open University of Japan (Approval Date: 14 October 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are not publicly available due to this data was obtained under conditions that are not intended to be published.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Observed VariableQuestionnaire
PEV1I tend to choose confectionery that I have a strong emotional attachment to
PEV2I have a personal favourite confectionery
PEV3Eating confectionery brings back childhood memories for me
PEV4Confectionery strengthens the bonds between friends and family members who eat it together
PEV5Traditional confectionery tugs at our emotional heartstrings.
SN1I tend to choose the same confectionery as my family and peers
SN2I am willing to buy confectionery recommended by a group of health-conscious peers.
SN3Buying traditional confectionery contributes to maintaining the sustainability of traditional confectionery
SN4Choosing confectionery as recommended by friends
SN5If you’re Thai, you should eat Thai sweets
FV1Nutritional values influence purchasing behaviour
FV2Certification schemes that ensure product safety have an impact on purchasing behaviour.
FV3Product packaging has an impact on purchasing behaviour
FV4Appearance of products has an impact on purchasing behaviour
FV5Price has an impact on purchasing behaviour
EV1Traditional confectionery should also innovate and promote new values
EV2Confectionery should also aim for organic value
EV3I am tempted to buy new and innovative confectionery.
EV4I respect traditional value of confectionery
EV5Thai sweets consist of our culture
EV6Western confectionery dilutes our traditional culture of confectionery
LY1I see myself as a loyal customer of traditional Thai confectionery
LY2When choosing sweets, traditional Thai confectionery will be the first choice for me
LY3I usually recommend traditional Thai confectionery to my friends and family
BH1I go to traditional Thai confectionery shops
BH2When I see a traditional Thai sweets shop, I cannot help myself from going into it
WOM1I refer to various WOM when I decide what to buy
WOM3I am active in sharing my experiences and views what I purchased
WOM2Consumers can contribute to business sustainability with positive WOM for good products and shops

References

  1. Business Telegraph Foreign Firms Dominate Thai Chocolate and Cookie Market. 2017. Available online: https://www.businesstelegraph.co.uk/thai-sweet-makers-must-look-overseas-for-growth/ (accessed on 25 August 2021).
  2. Blackwell, R.D.; Miniard, P.W.; Engel, J.F. Consumer behavior; Thomson Business and Economics: Mason, OH, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin, J.; Li, T.; Guo, J. Factors influencing consumers’ continuous purchase intention on fresh food e-commerce platforms: An organic foods-centric empirical investigation. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2021, 50, 101103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Madahi, A.; Sukati, I. The Effect of External Factors on Purchase Intention amongst Young Generation in Malaysia. Int. Bus. Res. 2012, 5, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pattanapomgthorn, J.; Sutduean, J.; Keohavong, B. Impact of genetically modified food knowledge, environmental, and food safety concerns on purchase intention of genetically modified food in mediating role of perceived risk: An empirical study in Thailand. World Food Policy 2020, 6, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research; Addison-Wesley, Reading: Boston, MA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aziz, F.; Md Rami, A.A.; Zaremohzzabieh, Z.; Ahrari, S. Effects of Emotions and Ethics on Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Employees: A Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rossmann, C. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Int. Encycl. Media Psychol. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sahu, A.K.; Padhy, R.K.; Dhir, A. Envisioning the future of behavioral decision-making: A systematic literature review of behavioral reasoning theory. Australas. Mark. J. 2020, 28, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Youn, H.; Xu, J.B.; Kim, J.H. Consumers’ perceptions, attitudes and behavioral intentions regarding the symbolic consumption of auspiciously named foods. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 98, 103024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oe, H.; Yamaoka, Y. Chinese Consumers’ Conspicuous Perspectives: The Context of Smartphone Purchase Behavior. J. Bus. Manag. Econ. Res. 2020, 4, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, J.J.; Ahn, S.C. The Effects of Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Behavioral Intention on Perceived Values in Traditional Marketplaces. J. Distrib. Sci. 2020, 18, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wijekoon, R.; Sabri, M.F. Determinants that influence green product purchase intention and behavior: A literature review and guiding framework. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Biondi, B.; Camanzi, L. Nutrition, hedonic or environmental? The effect of front-of-pack messages on consumers’ perception and purchase intention of a novel food product with multiple attributes. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, A.; Saleme, P.; Pang, B.; Durl, J.; Xu, Z. A systematic review of experimental studies investigating the effect of Cause-Related Marketing on consumer purchase intention. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, J.; Tao, J.; Chu, M. Behind the label: Chinese consumers’ trust in food certification and the effect of perceived quality on purchase intention. Food Control 2020, 108, 106825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jeya, A.M.S.; Stephen, S.A.; Soundararaja, K.V. A Study on the Role of Advertisement on Consumers to Purchase Confectionery Products in Tirunelveli District. Think India J. 2019, 22, 7074–7083. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krupka, Z.; Arežina, D. Importance of country-of-origin on different product categories purchase decision. Mark. Instytucji Nauk. I Badaw. 2017, 4, 35–54. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanrikulu, C. Theory of consumption values in consumer behaviour research: A review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 1176–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thomé, K.M.; Cappellesso, G.; Pinho, G.M. Food consumption values and the influence of physical activity. Br. Food J. 2020, 123, 943–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kushwah, S.; Dhir, A.; Sagar, M. Ethical consumption intentions and choice behavior towards organic food. Moderation role of buying and environmental concerns. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shin, Y.H.; Kim, H.; Severt, K. Predicting college students’ intention to purchase local food using the theory of consumption values. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2021, 24, 286–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oe, H.; Sunpakit, P.; Yamaoka, Y.; Liang, Y. An exploratory study of Thai consumers’ perceptions of “conspicuousness”: A case of luxury handbags. J. Consum. Mark. 2018, 35, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jose, H.; Kuriakose, V. Emotional or logical: Reason for consumers to buy organic food products. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 3999–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dörnyei, K.R.; Lunardo, R. When limited edition packages backfire: The role of emotional value, typicality and need for uniqueness. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 137, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chusak, C.; Tangmongkhonsuk, M.; Sudjapokinon, J.; Adisakwattana, S. The Association between Online Learning and Food Consumption and Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life in Terms of Mental Health of Undergraduate Students during COVID-19 Restrictions. Nutrients 2022, 14, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Suki, N.M.; Majeed, A.; Suki, N.M. Impact of consumption values on consumers’ purchase of organic food and green environmental concerns. Soc. Responsib. J. 2021, 18, 1128–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roh, T.; Seok, J.; Kim, Y. Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 67, 102988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Otter, V.; Prechtel, B.; Theuvsen, L. Country of origin effect for food products from developing and transition countries: A PLS analysis of German consumers’ perception. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2018, 30, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Insch, A.; Jackson, E. Consumer understanding and use of country-of-origin in food choice. Br. Food J. 2014, 116, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alhamad, H.; Donyai, P. The validity of the theory of planned behaviour for understanding people’s beliefs and intentions toward reusing medicines. Pharmacy 2021, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ajzen, I.; Kruglanski, A.W. Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychol. Rev. 2019, 126, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Summers, T.A.; Belleau, B.D.; Xu, Y. Predicting purchase intention of a controversial luxury apparel product. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2006, 10, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bellman, L.M.; Teich, I.; Clark, S.D. Fashion accessory buying intentions among female millennials. Rev. Bus. 2009, 30, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, H.; Karpova, E. Consumer attitudes toward fashion counterfeits: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2010, 28, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jain, S. Assessing the moderating effect of subjective norm on luxury purchase intention: A study of Gen Y consumers in India. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2020, 8, 517–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lavuri, R.; Jindal, A.; Akram, U.; Naik, B.K.R.; Halibas, A.S. Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers’ purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries. Sustain. Dev. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Izquierdo-Yusta, A.; Martínez–Ruiz, M.P.; Pérez–Villarreal, H.H. Studying the impact of food values, subjective norm and brand love on behavioral loyalty. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 65, 102885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ariffin, S.K.; Ng, F.; Mohsin, A.M.A. Examining the influencing factors of consumer purchase intention toward fast food with health concerns as a moderator. J. Entrep. Bus. Econ. 2021, 9, 39–71. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rhodes, R.E.; de Bruijn, G.J. How big is the physical activity intention–behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2013, 18, 296–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Qi, X.; Yu, H.; Ploeger, A. Exploring influential factors including COVID-19 on green food purchase intentions and the intention–behaviour gap: A qualitative study among consumers in a Chinese context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sultan, P.; Tarafder, T.; Pearson, D.; Henryks, J. Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: Moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in organic food consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 81, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Le-Anh, T.; Nguyen-To, T. Consumer purchasing behaviour of organic food in an emerging market. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2020, 44, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Koay, K.Y.; Cheah, C.W.; Chang, Y.X. A model of online food delivery service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: A combination of PLS-SEM and NCA approaches. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amirtha, R.; Sivakumar, V.J. Building loyalty through perceived value in online shopping–does family life cycle stage matter? Serv. Ind. J. 2021, 42, 1151–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tian, Y.; Kamran, Q. A Review of Antecedents and Effects of Loyalty on Food Retailers toward Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Piramanayagam, S.; Sud, S.; Seal, P.P. Relationship between tourists’ local food experiencescape, satisfaction and behavioural intention. Anatolia 2020, 31, 316–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Badrinarayanan, V.; Becerra, E.P. Shoppers’ attachment with retail stores: Antecedents and impact on patronage intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zayed, M.F.; Gaber, H.R.; El Essawi, N. Examining the Factors That Affect Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Organic Food Products in a Developing Country. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Radighieri, J.P.; Mulder, M. The impact of source effects and message valence on word of mouth retransmission. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2014, 56, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gremler, D.D.; Gwinner, K.P.; Brown, S.W. Generating positive word-of-mouth communication through customer-employee relationships. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2001, 12, 44–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Román-Augusto, J.A.; Garrido-Lecca-Vera, C.; Lodeiros-Zubiria, M.L.; Mauricio-Andia, M. Green Marketing: Drivers in the Process of Buying Green Products—The Role of Green Satisfaction, Green Trust, Green WOM and Green Perceived Value. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chai, S.; Choi, B.; Kim, M.; Cheng, T.C.E. Why do people speak about products online? The role of opinion leadership. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Krishnadas, R.; Renganathan, R. Determinants of Customer Satisfaction towards Using e-tailing Apps: A Study among Millennial Shoppers. In Proceedings of the 2022 Interdisciplinary Research in Technology and Management (IRTM), IEEE, Kolkata, India, 24–26 February 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gilboa, S.; Seger-Guttmann, T.; Partouche-Sebban, J. Increasing customer loyalty and WOM in an age of terror: Cross-cultural development and validation of the customers’ reactions to terror scale (CRTS). J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 64, 102785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Suartina, I.; Wimba, I.; Astrama, I.; Wulandari, N.L.A.A.; Rahmayanti, P.; Yasa, N.; Sujana, I. The role of brand love in mediating the effect of intensive distribution and social Media promotion on brand loyalty and E-WOM. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2022, 6, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nasir, M.; Adil, M.; Dhamija, A. The synergetic effect of after sales service, customer satisfaction, loyalty and repurchase intention on word of mouth. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 2021, 13, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahmed, S.; Kennedy, G.; Crum, J.; Vogliano, C.; McClung, S.; Anderson, C. Suitability of Data-Collection Methods, Tools, and Metrics for Evaluating Market Food Environments in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Foods 2021, 10, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brislin, R.W. Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Material. In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology; Triandis, H.C., Berry, J.W., Eds.; Methodology; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1980; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruvio, A.; Shoham, A. Innovativeness, Exploratory Behavior, Market Mavenship, and Opinion Leadership: An Empirical Examination in the Asian Context. Psychol. Mark. 2007, 24, 703–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Székely, G.J.; Rizzo, M.L.; Bakirov, N.K. Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. Ann. Stat. 2007, 35, 2769–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Urbach, N.; Ahlemann, F. Structural Equation Modeling in Information System Research Using Partial Least Squares. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 2010, 11, 5–40. [Google Scholar]
  66. Leontitsis, A.; Pagge, J. A Simulation Approach on Cronbach’s Alpha Statistical Significance. Math. Comput. Simul. 2007, 73, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C., Jr.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ratner, B. The Correlation Coefficient: Its Values Range between +1/−1, or Do They? J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark. 2009, 17, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. La Barbera, F.; Ajzen, I. Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Eur. J. Psychol. 2020, 16, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Sustainability 15 01548 g001
Figure 2. SEM analysis result.
Figure 2. SEM analysis result.
Sustainability 15 01548 g002
Table 1. Hypotheses and supported reference.
Table 1. Hypotheses and supported reference.
NumberHypothesesSupported Reference
H1aFunctional value has a significant impact on purchase intention.[13,14,15,16,17,18]
H1bEpistemic value has a significant impact on purchase intention.[19,20,21,22]
H1cPersonal & Emotional factor has a significant impact on purchase intention.[23,24,25,26,27,28]
H1dSubjective norm has a significant impact on purchase intention.[6,15,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]
H1eFour inflence factors has been covariance related.[11,23]
H2Purchase intention has significant impact on consumers’ behaviour.[41,42,43,44]
H3aBehaviour has a significant impact on loyalty.[45,46,47,48,49]
H3bBehaviour has a significant impact on word-of-mouth.[50,51,52,53,54,55]
H4Loyalty has a significant impact on word of mouth.[56,57]
Table 2. Sample data attributes.
Table 2. Sample data attributes.
ProfileFrequencyPercentCumulative Percent
Gender
Female25764.364.3
Male13834.598.8
No comment51.3100.0
Total400100.0
Age
16–20 years92.32.3
21–25 years6616.518.8
26–30 years12731.850.5
31–35 years5914.865.3
36–40 years5213.078.3
Over 40 years8721.8100.0
Total400100.0
Education
Secondary School51.31.3
Diploma Degree235.87.0
Bachelor’s Degree26365.872.8
Master’s Degree10426.098.8
Doctorate’s Degree51.3100.0
Total400100.0
Occupation
Private sector employee15538.838.8
State enterprise employee4010.048.8
Government employee4812.060.8
Self-employed (Business owner)4110.371.0
Unemployed225.576.5
Unoccupied (student)7117.894.3
Others235.8100.0
Total400100.0
Monthly income
Less than 10,000 Baht4411.011.0
10,001–15,000 Baht4010.021.0
15,001–20,000 Baht5213.034.0
20,001–25,000 Baht6015.049.0
25,001–30,000 Baht6315.864.8
30,001–35,000 Baht358.873.5
Over 35,001 Baht10626.5100.0
Total400100.0
Table 3. Descriptive analysis of the questions.
Table 3. Descriptive analysis of the questions.
QuestionnairesNMeanStd. Deviation
PEV14003.630.861
PEV24003.650.809
PEV34003.130.858
PEV44003.110.851
PEV54003.700.832
SN14003.110.977
SN24003.150.904
SN34002.960.865
SN4400 3.28 0.910
SN54003.260.860
FV14003.690.797
FV24003.660.752
FV34004.050.799
FV44003.870.783
FV54004.090.943
EV1400 3.42 0.790
EV2400 3.48 0.794
EV3400 2.99 0.758
EV4400 3.54 0.735
EV5400 3.33 0.902
EV6400 3.71 0.959
BH1400 3.87 0.783
BH2400 3.46 0.919
LY1400 3.37 0.874
LY2400 3.34 0.989
LY3400 3.89 0.883
WOM1400 3.30 0.841
WOM2400 3.55 0.806
WOM3400 3.54 0.920
Table 4. Factor analysis (influencing factors).
Table 4. Factor analysis (influencing factors).
Observed VariableComponent
1234Alpha
PEV10.777 0.097 0.256 −0.007 0.816
PEV20.752 0.160 0.356 0.134
PEV30.715 0.256 0.028 0.326
PEV40.688 0.103 0.457 0.155
PEV50.666 0.399 −0.106 0.261
SN10.133 0.825 0.150 0.031 0.829
SN20.212 0.790 0.193 0.011
SN30.181 0.741 0.031 0.236
SN40.109 0.575 0.170 0.469
SN50.188 0.518 0.326 0.169
FV10.125 0.173 0.715 0.245 0.769
FV20.084 0.343 0.671 0.121
FV30.461 0.068 0.628 0.362
FV40.344 0.208 0.508 0.190
FV50.219 0.277 0.464 0.118
EV10.118 0.063 0.234 0.825 0.824
EV20.205 0.007 0.377 0.736
EV30.204 0.388 −0.031 0.622
EV40.199 0.223 0.385 0.575
EV50.147 0.426 0.211 0.482
EV60.123 0.048 0.257 0.150
Sums of squared loadings4.6334.0863.9413.206
% of Valiance17.82015.71615.15912.331
Cumulative %17.82033.53648.69561.026
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. Rotation converged in 9 iterations.
Table 5. Factor analysis (behavioural factors).
Table 5. Factor analysis (behavioural factors).
Observed VariableComponent
123Alpha
LY10.8800.2080.0900.880
LY20.8020.0270.389
LY30.7700.1130.335
BH10.0930.8490.2340.774
BH20.2460.7580.086
WOM10.1540.0080.8740.708
WOM30.3570.1990.864
WOM20.1650.4440.705
Sums of squared loadings 3.483 1.603 1.278
% of Valiance 43.542 20.036 15.981
Cumulative % 43.542 63.577 79.558
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.
Table 6. Convergent and discriminant validity tests (influencing factors).
Table 6. Convergent and discriminant validity tests (influencing factors).
NMeanSDCACRAVEPEVSNFVEV
Personal emotional V4003.633 0.613 0.816 0.792 0.560 0.748
Subjective norm4003.657 0.702 0.829 0.829 0.618 0.547 **0.786
Fuctional V4004.060 0.714 0.769 0.485 0.320 0.516 **0.591 **0.566
Epsitemic V4004.105 0.711 0.824 0.578 0.407 0.468 **0.623 **0.527 **0.638
Values bold on the main diagonal are the square rooted of AVEs; SD is standard deviation; CA is Cronbach alpha; CR is Composite reliability; AVE is average variance standard. ** p < 0.01.
Table 7. Convergent and discriminant validity tests (behavioural factors).
Table 7. Convergent and discriminant validity tests (behavioural factors).
NMeanSDCACRAVEBHLYWOM
Behaviour400 3.533 0.893 0.880 0.858 0.670 0.818
Loyalty400 3.665 0.883 0.774 0.786 0.432 0.396 **0.657
WOM400 3.396 0.841 0.708 0.889 0.728 0.255 **0.584 **0.853
Values bold on the main diagonal are the square rooted of AVEs; SD is standard deviation; CA is Cronbach alpha; CR is Composite reliability; AVE is average variance standard. ** p < 0.01.
Table 8. Result of the SEM analysis.
Table 8. Result of the SEM analysis.
To FromEstimatep
Purchase Intention<---Epistemic value0.173 1 fix
Purchase Intention<---Personal & Emortional value0.493 0.001
Purchase Intention<---Functional value0.174 0.115
Purchase Intention<---Subjective Norm0.343 ***
Behaviour<---Purchase Intention0.942 ***
Loyalty<---Behaviour0.937 ***
WOM<---Behaviour0.936 1 fix
WOM<---Loyalty0.271 ***
PEV1<---Personal & Emortional value0.712 ***
PEV2<---Personal & Emortional value0.907 1 fix
PEV3<---Personal & Emortional value0.703 ***
PEV4<---Personal & Emortional value0.876 ***
SN1<---Subjective Norm0.717 1 fix
SN2<---Subjective Norm0.814 ***
SN3<---Subjective Norm0.830 ***
FV1<---Functional value0.712 1 fix
FV2<---Functional value0.762 ***
EV1<---Epistemic value0.755 1 fix
EV2<---Epistemic value0.940 ***
BH1<---Behaviour0.763 1 fix
BH2<---Behaviour0.843 ***
LY1<---Loyalty0.884 1 fix
LY2<---Loyalty0.805 ***
LY3<---Loyalty0.845 ***
WOM1<---WOM0.795 1 fix
WOM2<---WOM0.620 ***
WOM3<---WOM0.652 ***
Covariances Estimatep
Epistemic value<-->Personal & Emortional value0.511 ***
Epistemic value<-->Subjective Norm0.280 ***
Personal & Emortional value<-->Subjective Norm0.474 ***
Functional value<-->Subjective Norm0.527 ***
Epistemic value<-->Functional value0.609 ***
Personal & Emortional value<-->Functional value0.666 ***
*** means p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oe, H.; Yamaoka, Y.; Ochiai, H. Personal and Emotional Values Embedded in Thai-Consumers’ Perceptions: Key Factors for the Sustainability of Traditional Confectionery Businesses. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021548

AMA Style

Oe H, Yamaoka Y, Ochiai H. Personal and Emotional Values Embedded in Thai-Consumers’ Perceptions: Key Factors for the Sustainability of Traditional Confectionery Businesses. Sustainability. 2023; 15(2):1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oe, Hiroko, Yasuyuki Yamaoka, and Hiroko Ochiai. 2023. "Personal and Emotional Values Embedded in Thai-Consumers’ Perceptions: Key Factors for the Sustainability of Traditional Confectionery Businesses" Sustainability 15, no. 2: 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop