Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method for Embedded Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Neural Network for Slip Detection on Ice Surface
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transient Electrical and Optical Characteristics of Electron and Proton Irradiated SiGe Detectors

1
Institute of Photonics and Nanotechnology, Vilnius University, Sauletekio Ave. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Laboratory of Radiation Effects, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of NAS of Belarus, P. Brovki Str. 17, 220072 Minsk, Belarus
3
Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Belarusian State University, Independence Ave. 4, 220030 Minsk, Belarus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(23), 6884; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236884
Submission received: 10 November 2020 / Revised: 26 November 2020 / Accepted: 30 November 2020 / Published: 2 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)

Abstract

:
The particle detector degradation mainly appears through decrease of carrier recombination lifetime and manifestation of carrier trapping effects related to introduction of carrier capture and emission centers. In this work, the carrier trap spectroscopy in Si1−xGex structures, containing either 1 or 5% of Ge, has been performed by combining the microwave probed photoconductivity, pulsed barrier capacitance transients and spectra of steady-state photo-ionization. These characteristics were examined in pristine, 5.5 MeV electron and 1.6 MeV proton irradiated Si and SiGe diodes with n+p structure.

1. Introduction

SiGe material based devices are capable to operate in the radiation harsh environment [1,2,3,4]. It had been demonstrated [5,6] that SiGe alloys are prospective for fabrication of γ-ray detectors. Nevertheless, it has been determined that the Si1−xGex single crystals can only be obtained for alloys containing either 0.9 < x < 1 or 0 < x < 0.15 of Ge. This alloy usually becomes polycrystalline for the other range of Ge content [6,7]. The radiation damage of the Si1−xGex devices related with introduction of radiation defects [3,8,9,10,11] can be healed by the atomic reconfiguration of the crystal structure during material anneal [12,13,14]. The particle detector degradation [15,16,17,18] usually appears through decrease of carrier recombination lifetime. Carrier recombination lifetime specifies the fast component of carrier density relaxation within transients of carrier decay via carrier-pair annihilation through deep centers. The decrease of recombination lifetime testifies an enhancement of radiation defect concentration which reduces signals and efficiency of detectors [16,19,20]. The carrier trapping is associated with the single-type carrier emission centers. Capture of the single type carriers to these centers proceeds simultaneously with carrier annihilation, while subsequent thermal emission from these centers delays recombination process. Thereby, the asymptotic component of carrier density relaxation appears in carrier decay transients [20]. The rather shallow levels are usually associated with thermal emission centers which are responsible for the delayed responses of radiation sensors and leakage current [16]. Recombination characteristics of irradiated materials specifies the evolution of radiation defect introduction, their types and densities [19,20]. However, reports on investigations of the carrier recombination characteristics in SiGe alloys irradiated with various species of particles are scarce [12] in literature. In this work, the carrier trap spectroscopy in Si1−xGex structures, containing 1 and 5% of Ge, have been performed by combining several contact and contactless techniques. The microwave probed photoconductivity, pulsed barrier capacitance transients and spectra of steady-state photo-ionization [20] in pristine, 5.5 MeV electron and 1.6 MeV proton irradiated Si and SiGe diodes with n+p structure were examined. It has been revealed that both carrier recombination and trapping lifetimes decrease near-reciprocally to density of radiation defects acting as carrier capture and thermal emission centers, with predominance of point radiation defects. It has been hypothesized that the single-type deep centers are involved in both carrier photo-generation and thermal emission processes. Activity of point defects can be modified by anneal procedures, and sensor functionality can be recovered (at least, partially). On the other hand, Ge can be used as an isovalent impurity, instead of carbon, within engineering of the strong field layers in advanced low gain avalanche detectors made of Si.

2. Samples and Experimental Techniques

The radiation detectors under tests were fabricated at Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of NAS of Belarus in a configuration of n+p diodes using SiGe substrates grown by Czochralski technique. The diodes contained the 2 × 3 mm2 surface area and 500 μm thickness. Several Si1−xGex single-crystal alloys with bandgap EG varied according to x as [21] EG = 1.12 − 0.41x + 0.008x2 (eV) for x < 0.85 (at 300 K) were fabricated by incorporating either 1 or 5% of Ge. The diode basis was formed of p-type Si1−xGex material which conductivity was controlled by concentration of boron dopants. The p-Si based diodes with the same doping were examined for comparison. Irradiations with 5.5 MeV electrons at room temperature were implemented by using a linear electron accelerator at Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of NAS of Belarus. Different exposures at fixed electron flux of 2 × 1012 cm−2s−1 were applied to vary electron irradiation fluence. Irradiations with 1.6 MeV proton beam were performed by a Tandetron 4110A accelerator at Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Lithuania, gradually increasing fluence. Proton beam current was varied in the range of 20–40 nA, and the largest fluence up to 1015 p/cm2 was collected under the longest exposure. The pristine (Ap, Bp and Cp), electron (Ae, Be and Ce) and proton (AP1, BP1 and CP1) irradiated Si and SiGe diodes, respectively listed in Table 1, were examined.
The routine capacitance-voltage (C-V) characteristics were examined to control dopant concentration. These characteristics were measured at dc bias voltage (≤5 V) using a 1 MHz frequency harmonic test signal, before and after irradiation with definite fluence. The C-V characteristics were recorded employing a QuadTech 7600B LRC-meter.
The pulsed capacitance technique has been applied for junction barrier evaluation by linearly increasing voltage (BELIV) [20,22,23], and for estimation of carrier emission lifetime in the pristine and irradiated diodes. The BELIV circuitry contains a pulse generator (any generator of special waveforms) of the linearly increasing voltage Up(t) = At which is connected in series with a diode under test and a load resistor RL. The barrier capacitance (Cb) charging current transients iC(t) are recorded by an Agilent DSO6102A oscilloscope (purchased from Agilent Company, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the 50 Ω load input. Routinely, the charging current transients of the reverse biased diode are recorded in dark. To vary the filling of the carrier emission centers, the BELIV transients can be measured under bias illumination using either steady-state or short laser pulses. The linearly increasing voltage U(t) modifies the barrier capacitance Cb(t) = Cb0(1 + U(t)/Ubi)−1/2. Charging of the barrier capacitance Cb(t), which varies in time (t), induces a current iC(t). Here, Cb0 = εε0S/w0 = (εε0S2eNA/2Ubi)1/2 is the barrier capacitance of the non-biased diode of an area S, ε0 is a vacuum permittivity, ε is material dielectric permittivity, e is elementary charge, Ubi is the built-in potential barrier, w0 = (2εε0Ubi/eNA)1/2 is a width of depletion due to the built-in barrier and dependent on dopant concentration NA, A = UP/τPL is the ramp of linearly increasing voltage (LIV) pulse with a UP peak amplitude and τPL duration. The current transient iC(t) in the external circuit, determined by the time dependent barrier capacitance changes, is represented as [22]:
i C ( t ) = d q d t = U t ( C b + U C b U ) = U C t C b 0 1 + U C ( t ) 2 U b i ( 1 + U C ( t ) U b i ) 3 / 2 A C b 0 1 + A t 2 U b i ( 1 + A t U b i ) 3 / 2
Then, the current transient iC(t) contains an initial (t = 0) step followed by a descending component. The initial current step iC(0) = ACb0 is associated with the displacement current, and it is usually delayed by RLCb. Therefore, the iC(t) can be estimated by using convolution iC(t) = (RLCb0)−10t iC(x)exp[−(t−x)/(RLCb0)]dx integral. The vertex amplitude of the initial current step is proportional to a value of a ramp A of LIV pulse. The ramp A can be controlled by differentiating LIV pulse. The peak value of the iC(t) is a reciprocal of the depletion width, which is modulated by the excess carrier concentration at the moment of appearance of a LIV pulse. The descending component of BELIV transients is usually governed by the charge extraction. Thereby, the changes of the shape of the diode-inherent BELIV transients are determined by instantaneous densities of carriers, and the components of transients indicate manifestation of carrier recombination and thermal emission centers. In the structures containing high concentration of emission centers, the carriers thermally emitted from these traps result in the formation of the charge-collection phase of a BELIV pulse. The corresponding generation current is
i g ( t ) = e n i S w 0 ( 1 + U ( t ) / U b i ) 1 / 2 / τ g
(here, ni is the intrinsic density of carriers and τg is the carrier lifetime relative to thermal emission), and it determines the barrier recharging due to carriers emitted into free carrier band and appears within a rearward phase of the transient as the increasing component of the BELIV transient under either illumination or resonant LIV pulse duration (τPL), relative to τg. The ig(t) is accounted for by an increase of the volume from which the carriers are collected by the increased depletion width during the reverse-polarity LIV pulse. This current increases with U(t) within LIV pulse and can exceed the barrier charging current in the rearward phase of the transient. The transient of the total reverse current is a sum of the currents
i R ( t ) = i C ( t ) + i g ( t )
The steady-state photo-ionization spectroscopy (SS-PIS) [20,23] was applied to highlight the photo-active centers in the pristine and irradiated diodes with various content of Ge within SiGe alloy. The photometric 800 W lamp served as a source of varied wavelength which light was dispersed through a double-path monochromator DMR4. Thereby, the excitation wavelength was varied in the range of 0.5–3 μm. The Keithley 2635B source-meter was employed to measure the dc photo-current induced by varied excitation wavelength. The sample under test was mounted in a cryostat and cooled by liquid nitrogen to decrease the impact of phonons and leakage current. A photo-ionization spectrum usually shows a step-like structure. The photo-ionization step can be approximated by the Kopylov-Pikhtin model [24,25]:
σ e p h 0 e ( E + E d l h ν ) 2 Γ 2 h ν ( E + E d l ) 2 E d E
Here, σe-ph is the photo-ionization cross-section, as a parameter integrated over spectrum of electron energies E, Edl is the photo-activation energy of a definite center and the electron-phonon coupling is defined by the broadening factor Γ. The photo-generated carriers of density N() induces a photo-current i() dependent on excitation photon energy :
i ( h ν ) = q e N ( h ν ) S μ U R d
where qe is the elementary charge, S is the junction area, d is the diode base thickness, μ is the carrier mobility and UR is the reverse bias voltage.
To estimate density of carrier recombination and thermal emission centers, introduced by electron and proton irradiations, the carrier characteristic lifetimes have been extracted from the recorded carrier decay transients, as a slope of carrier density relaxation curves. These evaluations were performed by employing the microwave-probed photoconductivity (MW-PC) transients recorded ex-situ and analyzed as a function of irradiation fluence. The carriers were excited by infrared 1062 nm laser with 400 ps pulses, and excited area was probed by 22 GHz microwaves using a slit antenna. The transients were recorded by Tektronix TDS-5104 oscilloscope (purchased from Tektronix company, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK) using 50 Ω load resistor. The single exponential MW-PC decays were usually observed in the as-irradiated diodes. This indicates that the linear recombination prevails (with a single slope of the transient displayed within a semi-log scale). The deep traps act as the recombination defects, while carriers are temporary captured on shallow levels which act as the trapping (generation current) centers. The carrier recombination lifetime (τR) was measured within the initial MW-PC decay stage at e−1 level relative to a peak value of the transient. A few transients showed a two-componential decay containing the asymptotic decay component, which is related to the trapping lifetime (τtr). The two-componential decay is there caused by the multi-trapping effect. This two-componential transient appears when carrier lifetime depends on the excess carrier density. The thermally generated carriers from the emission centers, vary the concentration of the recombining carriers and delay the carrier-pair annihilation process. The latter carrier-pair annihilation process prevails in the initial stage of carrier decay. The initial decay is ascribed [20] to recombination lifetime τR while asymptotic decay is characterized by the instantaneous trapping lifetime τinst,tr related to trapping coefficient Ktr as
τ i n s t , t r = τ R K t r ;     K t r = 1 + T t r N C , V , e , h , T t r ( N C , V , e , h , T t r + Δ n ) 2
where Ttr is a concentration of shallow trapping centers, NC,V,e,h,Ttr = NC,Vexp(ΔETtr/kT) is the effective density of band states, and Δn is the trapping attributed excess carrier density. The quasi-exponential decay with time (t) dependent instantaneous lifetime τinst,trn(t)) is a reason of the non-linear carrier decay process.
The sample depth dependent carrier decay lifetime appears when sample thickness is larger than radiation stopping range. Such a situation appeared under diode irradiation with 1.6 MeV protons. To overcome profiling of carrier lifetime, the near-surface excitation regime has been applied, and carrier decay transients were examined in-situ during proton irradiations. Therefore, the sample with the probes were mounted within vacuum irradiation chamber. Then carriers were excited by strongly absorbed 532 nm laser light using 400 ps pulses. The sample-edge excited area [20] of effective depth deff, related to an absorption coefficient (α532−1 ~ deff,) of the diode material at the excitation wavelength, was probed by 22 GHz microwaves using a needle-tip coaxial antenna. The transients were recorded by DSO6102A oscilloscope using 50 Ω load resistor. The two-componential decay can also appear in such a situation. However, the short decay component should be attributed to transitional processes due to surface recombination, while asymptotic relaxation is ascribed to the effective carrier decay lifetime composed of the surface τs and the bulk τR recombination, as [20]:
τ e f f 1 = τ R 1 + τ s 1
The τeffτR when τs >> τR. To implement such a regime, the excitation fiber and MW needle-tip antenna are used. These probes are then located at the predicted (through TRIM simulations) stopping depth relatively to the sample surfaces.

3. Parameters Extracted from Transient Electrical and Optical Characteristics

The dopant concentrations (NS) in the diode base region were evaluated using the measured C–V characteristics. These parameters in the pristine and irradiated samples are listed in Table 2. The experimental errors in evaluation of dopant concentration NS do not exceed 2% of the extracted values. It can be deduced from Table 2 that the effective dopant concentration in Si and Si0.99Ge0.01 material diodes decreases with enhancement of irradiation fluence. This can be explained by introduction of donor type radiation defects which compensate boron dopants.
However, the opposite tendency of doping level variation with irradiation fluence was revealed for the Si0.95Ge0.05 material diodes. This might be explained either through prevailing of the acceptor-like radiation defects in p-type Si0.95Ge0.05 material or via lattice bond length variations which affect the conduction and valence band parameters of the SiGe alloy [26] and the consequent shifts of Fermi level. The thermal activation energy shifts of radiation induced deep traps to low values with increase of Ge content in the SiGe alloy were inferred using DLTS characteristics obtained on the same diodes and published elsewhere. This result supports an assumption of lattice bond length variations with Ge content [27].
The transients of the barrier capacitance pulsed charging (BELIV) might be useful in estimation of the thermal emission centers introduced by doping and irradiation procedures. The BELIV transients recorded on Si as well as Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes irradiated with 5.5 MeV electrons and rather moderate fluences are illustrated in Figure 1a. These transients are peak-current normalized to exclude an impact of diode area and absolute value of barrier height. The rather short LIV pulses (of τPL = 48 μs) are there employed to have considerably large charging currents (due to elevated ramp A = UP/τPL of LIV pulses of the invariable UP = 12 V amplitude). The shape of transients in Figure 1a manifests only the impact of barrier capacitance charging where an initial step ACb0 represents the displacement current (iC(t)), delayed due to measurement circuit RLCb0, and a descending component governed by the subsequent charge extraction current. Therefore, the iC(t) can be estimated by using a convolution iC(t) = (RLCb0)−10t iC(x)exp[−(t − x)/(RLCb0)]dx integral. The impact of the thermal emission centers can be highlighted by additional illumination (Figure 1b) implemented using IR (1064 nm) laser. This additional illumination changes filling of the thermal emission centers. The laser generated excess carriers of density nex may change the effective density of band states as NC,effNC − nex, and, thereby, thermal emission time τg = exp(Etr/kT)/vthσNC,eff (in Equation (2)). Here, Etr is an activation energy of trap, kT is the thermal energy at temperature T, vth is thermal velocity of trapped carriers, σ is the carrier capture/emission cross-section. Thus, reduction of NC,eff leads to an increase of τg, which approaches to τPL and highlights the trapping/thermal emission centers. Additionally, the deeper an emission center (relative to the activation energy Etr) the longer τg is.
Figure 1b illustrates how the irradiation and additional illumination changes the BELIV transients of Si and Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes. The radiation introduced emission centers increase the generation lifetime τg~1/NC,eff, due to reduction of the NC,eff by the released carriers, as NC,effNCnex. Also, the generation current increases, as the enhanced density mtr of emission centers elevates the ig*~emtrSw/τPL, when the ig* value exceeds that of iC (see Equation (3)). Thereby, the enhancement of the electron irradiation fluence determines the increase of the thermal emission current in both Si and Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes (Figure 1b). However, density mtr of the radiation induced emission centers seems to be dependent on the single crystal matrix. The proportionality of the ig* to mtr is masked by the competition of ig* and iC components within iR (Equation (3)), and the observed values of ig significantly depend of the range of τPL. Thereby, the qualitative estimation of thermal emission centers can reliably be elucidated using BELIV transients. Nevertheless, assuming τg→τPL for transients shown in Figure 1b, the mtr introduced by electron beam into Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes is 1.8 times larger relative to that of Si material diode, at the same collected fluence of 2 × 1014 e/cm2. On the other hand, it can testify that the prevailing thermal emission centers in Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes are shallower by 15 meV than those, radiation induced into Si diodes. The latter result is in line with DLTS results (obtained for the same Si and Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes) due to thermal activation energy shifts of radiation induced deep traps to low values with enhancement of Ge content within SiGe alloy.
The changes of carrier thermal generation lifetime can be directly observed in heavily irradiated diodes with significantly increased mtr values when τg→τPL through elongated τPL and ig*→iC due to reduction of the ramp A of long LIV pulses. Such a situation had been materialized in Si0.99Ge0.01 diodes irradiated with 2 × 1015 e/cm2 5.5 MeV electrons, as illustrated in Figure 2. There, the BELIV transients in the pristine and irradiated diodes are compared. It can be clearly noticed, that the initial peak value in the BELIV transient is reduced for the irradiated diode due to the excess carrier capture. There, the decrease of ramp A for long LIV pulses should be coordinated with the τPL range to get igiC and to directly highlight the ig component. Direct separation of the ig component enables estimation of the τg and Etr values. Assuming the inherent values of vth = 107 cm/s, σ = 10−14 cm2, and NC = 1019 cm−3 in Si and SiGe at room temperature, the Etr = 0.47 eV was extracted using the transients of Figure 2. This would imply the traps with deep levels in the mid-bandgap.
The recorded SS-PI spectra (Figure 3) really represent the step-like structure containing a single step, where spectral variation electron-photon interaction cross-section is well approximated by the Kopylov-Pikhtin model, represented by Equation (4). The spectral step peaked in the range of 1.1–1.3 eV, being above bandgap of EG = 1.1 eV for the SiGe alloys, might appear due to the bandgap absorption modified by surface recombination. This assumption is supported by the changes of SS-PIS signal reduction in the range of >1.2 eV for both SiGe alloys. This SS-PIS signal decrease develops noticeably with Ge content (Figure 3). The simulated spectral steps, made using this Equation (4) and assuming values of the broadening factor in the range of Γ = 0.119–0.120, and shown in Figure 3 by dashed-curves. Superposition of the measured and simulated spectral steps implies that a single deep photo-active center with activation energy of Edl = 0.97 eV prevails in all the electron irradiated samples irrespective of Ge content. Nevertheless, values of the photo-current (height of spectral steps) appear to be slightly dependent on irradiation fluence and Ge content within SiGe alloy. This effect can be explained by fluence dependent excess carrier concentration, generated by electron-photon interaction within SS-PIS process. The SS-PIS photo-current should be proportional to this carrier concentration (according to Equation (5)), which seems to be modulated by carrier capture and recombination processes. Thereby, a SS-PIS step obtained in SiGe diodes irradiated with 2 × 1014 e/cm2 fluence appears to be the higher one relative to that irradiated with 2 × 1015 e/cm2 fluence (Figure 3). Differences of relative heights of the SS-PIS steps obtained in the electron irradiated Si and SiGe alloys can be explained by activation energy shifts of radiation induced deep traps with enhancement of Ge content within SiGe alloy. Assuming a simplified approach, where these single-type deep centers are involved in both carrier photo-activation (SS-PIS, Figure 3) and thermal emission (within BELIV transients, Figure 1b and Figure 2), a configuration diagram might be sketched (see the inset i for Figure 3).
Modulation of the concentration of the photo-excited excess carriers by carrier capture and recombination processes was examined using analysis of the photo-conductivity transients. Carrier lifetime in pristine and electron irradiated samples was extracted after irradiations using microwave-probed photoconductivity (MW-PC) transients (Figure 4a). The deep traps act as the recombination defects. However, the shallow levels act as the trapping (generation current) centers [20], which temporary capture the excess carriers followed by further thermal trapped carrier release into free states. The carrier recombination lifetime (τR) was measured within the initial MW-PC decay stage at e−1 level relative to a peak value of the transient (Figure 4a). Some transients (in samples irradiated with large fluence) contained the second (asymptotic decay) component, which is related to the trapping lifetime (τtr), Equation (6). Values of both carrier lifetimes (τR and τtr) as a function of electron irradiation fluence are represented in Figure 4b.
It can be noticed in Figure 4b that trapping lifetimes (τtr) are nearly an order of magnitude longer than the recombination lifetimes. Also, the trapping effect can be resolved reliably only in heavily irradiated diodes when radiation defect concentrations are sufficiently large. Both carrier recombination and trapping lifetimes decrease near-reciprocally relative to density of the radiation defects acting as carrier capture and thermal emission centers. Variation of values of the carrier recombination lifetimes in the electron irradiated Si and SiGe diodes obeys the same line (eye-guided by dot curve in Figure 4b) in a double-log τRΦ scale. This hints on nearly the same mechanisms of radiation damage of the examined Si and SiGe materials.
The more complicated situation (relatively to that of penetrative electrons, illustrated in Figure 4) appears in recording and analysis of the MW-PC transients after and during irradiation with stopped particles, namely 1.6 MeV protons. There, the sample depth dependent carrier decay lifetime is inherent. As mentioned, the near-surface excitation regime has been applied, and carrier decay transients recorded within stopping range of 1.6 MeV protons were examined in-situ during proton irradiations, to overcome profiling of carrier lifetime. The recorded transients appear also (like in the case of carrier trapping) to be similar to the two-componential decay (Figure 5a,b). However, the initial decay fragment of the transient should be ascribed to the transitional processes of surface recombination [20], due to inhomogeneous excitation by strongly absorbed light. The asymptotic decay is then governed by the surface (τs) and bulk recombination (τR) lifetimes. The latter parameter is really modified by radiation defects, and transients (illustrated in Figure 5a,b) significantly vary depending on the collected proton irradiation fluence. The surface (τs) recombination lifetime has been additionally estimated by dedicated investigations using a technique of several excitation wavelengths [20]. Then, values of the carrier bulk recombination lifetime (Figure 5c), attributed to proton introduced radiation defects, were corrected using these τs and the as–measured τRΦ characteristics, by applying Equation (7). It can be inferred from Figure 5c that corrections of the τR values are important only in the range of small fluences where τs is close to those of τR values. The corrected τRΦ characteristics, obtained for diodes made of SiGe alloy with different Ge content, appear to be the near-reciprocally dependent on density of the radiation defects, assumed being proportional to the proton irradiation fluence Φ. As can be deduced from Figure 5c, the carrier recombination lifetime, governed by radiation defects, is obtained to be longer for the SiGe alloy with the larger Ge content (of 5%) than that of 1% Ge. This result implies that the SiGe alloys (with enhanced Ge content) can be prospective materials in fabrication of radiation tolerant particle (especially hadron) detectors. However, a trade-off for Ge content enhancement within SiGe material and growth of the single-crystal SiGe alloys should be found.

4. Summary

The radiation hardness of SiGe alloys relative to penetrative (5.5 MeV electrons) and strongly absorbed (1.6 MeV protons) high energy particles has been estimated by control of carrier emission and capture centers characterized by carrier recombination as well as thermal emission lifetime variations dependent on irradiation fluence. These characteristics have been recorded in diodes made of SiGe alloys with different Ge content and compared with those obtained for Si of the same p-type conductivity and doping level.
It has been demonstrated that qualitative estimation of thermal emission centers can be implemented using BELIV transients related to barrier capacitance of the diodes. Nevertheless, the density of trapping centers introduced by electron beam into Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes might be 1.8 times larger relative to the Si material diode, at the same collected fluence. On the other hand, it can testify that the prevailing thermal emission centers in Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes are shallower by 15 meV than those, radiation induced into Si diodes. The latter result is in line with DLTS results obtained for the same Si and Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes due to thermal activation energy shifts of radiation induced deep traps to low values with enhancement of Ge content within SiGe alloy. It has been demonstrated that separation of the generation current components within BELIV transients (when possible) enables estimation of the thermal emission lifetime and, consequently, thermal activation energy Etr. The activation energy of Etr = 0.47 eV was extracted from BELIV transients for the prevailing species of the radiation defects. The close values of activation energy in the range of 0.5–0.58 eV had been revealed by the dedicated investigations of DLTS spectra in the irradiated Si and SiGe diodes [11,13]. The radiation defects with such the activation energy were assigned to the radiation induced complexes of interstitials with carbon or boron impurities. Thereby, the revealed prevailing emission centers in our work are in line with DLTS data published in literature. The prevailing photo-generation centers with photo-activation energy of 0.97 eV have been also revealed using the steady-state photo-ionization spectroscopy. Assuming a simplified approach, where the single-type deep centers are involved in both carrier photo-ionization and thermal emission, a configuration diagram for the carrier capture-release processes has been sketched. It has been revealed that both carrier recombination and trapping lifetimes decrease near-reciprocally relative to density of radiation defects acting as carrier capture and thermal emission centers. It has been found that variation of the recombination lifetimes in the irradiated Si and SiGe diodes obeys the same type curve in the double-log τRΦ scale. This hints on nearly the same mechanisms of radiation damage of the examined Si and SiGe materials. A technique of measurements, implemented by locating the fiber and needle-tip MW probes within 1.6 MeV proton stopping range, has been applied to examine fluence dependent lifetime characteristics under irradiations by strongly absorbed particles. It has been revealed that the carrier recombination lifetime, governed by radiation defects introduced using the strongly absorbed proton irradiation, is longer for the SiGe alloy containing the larger Ge content (of 5%). This might be explained through prevailing of the acceptor-like radiation defects in p-type SiGe alloy material containing the enhanced content of Ge. Also, it has been shown the predominance of point radiation defects. Activity of point defects can be modified by anneal procedures and, thereby, recovery of irradiated sensors can be performed. The SiGe alloys might also be promising in engineering of the strong field layer of the advanced low gain avalanche detectors [28].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.G.; methodology, E.G. and T.C.; software, K.P. and V.R.; validation, E.G., T.C. and L.M.; formal analysis, L.D., J.P. and V.R.; investigation, L.D., J.P., K.P. and V.R.; resources, S.L. and L.M.; data curation, K.P. and J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, E.G.; writing—review and editing, E.G. and T.C.; visualization, E.G. and T.C.; supervision, E.G.; project administration, T.C.; funding acquisition, T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Council of Lithuania according to Lithuania-Belarus collaboration project S-LB-19-1 “Silicon-germanium novel alloys for creation of radiation-hard semiconductor devices”.

Acknowledgments

Vitalij Kovalevskij is acknowledged for proton irradiations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haugerud, B.M.; Pratapgarhwala, M.M.; Comeau, J.P.; Sutton, A.K.; Prakash, A.P.G.; Cressler, J.D.; Marshall, P.W.; Marshall, C.J.; Ladbury, R.L.; El-Diwany, M.; et al. Proton and gamma radiation effects in a new first-generation SiGe HBT technology. Solid State Electron. 2006, 50, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ullan, M.; Diez, S.; Lozano, M.; Pellegrini, G.; Knoll, D.; Heinemann, B. Combined effect of bias and annealing in gamma and neutron radiation assurance tests of SiGe bipolar transistors for HEP applications. Solid State Electron. 2011, 56, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cressler, J.D. Radiation effects in SiGe technology. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2013, 60, 1992–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Diez, S.; Clark, T.; A Grillo, A.; Kononenko, W.; Martinez-McKinney, F.; Newcomer, F.M.; Norgren, M.; Rescia, S.; Spencer, E.; Spieler, H.; et al. Radiation hardness evaluation of a 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technology for high energy physics applications. J. Instrum. 2013, 8, P10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yonenaga, I. SiX-Ge1−x bulk crystals. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Hashmi, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 8647–8651. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kissinger, G.; Pizzini, S. Silicon, Germanium, and Their Alloys: Growth, Defects, Impurities, and Nanocrystals, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Usami, N. 4-Types of silicon–germanium (SiGe) bulk crystal growth methods and their applications. In Silicon–Germanium (SiGe) Nanostructures: Production, Properties and Applications in Electronics; Shiraki, Y., Usami, N., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 72–82. [Google Scholar]
  8. Larsen, A.N.; Hansen, A.B.; Mesli, A. Irradiation-induced defects in SiGe. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2008, 154–155, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Skardi, H.; Hansen, A.B.; Mesli, A.; Larsen, A.N. The di-vacancy in particle-irradiated, strain-relaxed SiGe. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2002, 186, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hayama, S.; Davies, G.; Tan, J.; Markevich, V.P.; Peaker, A.R.; Evans-Freeman, J.; Vernon-Parry, K.D.; Abrosimov, N.V. Carbon-related centers in irradiated SiGe alloys. Phys. B 2003, 340–342, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Markevich, V.P.; Peaker, A.R.; Murin, L.I.; Abrosimov, N.V. Oxygen-related radiation-induced defects in SiGe alloys. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2003, 15, S2835–S2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Markevich, V.; Peaker, A.R.; Çapan, I.; Lastovskii, S.; Dobaczewski, L.; Emtsev, V.; Abrosimov, N. Electrically active defects induced by irradiation with electrons, neutrons and ions in Ge-rich SiGe alloys. Phys. B 2007, 401–402, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lastovskii, S.B.; Markevich, V.P.; Yakushevich, H.S.; Murin, L.I.; Krylov, V.P. Radiation-induced bistable centers with deep levels in silicon n+–p structures. Semiconductors 2016, 50, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gaubas, E.; Ceponis, T.; Uleckas, A.; Vaitkus, J.; Raisanen, J. Recombination characteristics in 2–3 MeV protons irradiated FZ Si. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2010, 612, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takakura, K.; Furukawa, H.; Kuroki, S.; Hayama, K.; Kudou, T.; Shigaki, K.; Ohyama, H.; Simoen, E.; Eneman, G.; Claeys, C. Radiation defects and degradation of C-doped SiGe diodes irradiated by electrons. Mat. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2006, 9, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moll, M. Radiation tolerant semiconductor sensors for tracking detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2006, 565, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spieler, H. Semiconductor Detector Systems; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ahmed, S.N. Physisc and Engineering of Radiation Detection, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaubas, E.; Ceponis, T.; Jasiunas, A.; Uleckas, A.; Vaitkus, J.; Cortina, E.; Militaru, O. Correlated evolution of barrier capacitance char ging, generation, and drift currents and of carrier lifetime in Si structures during 25 MeV neutrons irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 232104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gaubas, E.; Simoen, E.; Vanhellemont, J. Review—Carrier lifetime spectroscopy for defect characterization in semiconductor materials and devices. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, P3108–P3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. SiGe—Silicon Germanium: Band Structure and Carrier Concentration. Available online: http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/SiGe/bandstr.html#Band (accessed on 25 November 2020).
  22. Gaubas, E.; Ceponis, T.; Vaitkus, J.V. Pulsed Capacitance Technique for Evaluation of Barrier Structures; LAP Lampert Academic Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaubas, E.; Kalendra, V.; Ceponis, T.; Uleckas, A.; Tekorius, A.; Vaitkus, J.; Velicka, A. Study of deep level characteristics in the neutrons irradiated Si structures by combining pulsed and steady-state spectroscopy techniques. J. Instrum. 2012, 7, C11006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Alkauskas, A.; McCluskey, M.D.; Van de Walle, C.G. Tutorial: Defects in semiconductors-combining experiment and theory. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 181101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kopylov, A.A.; Pikhtin, A.N. Effect of temperature on the optical-absorption spectra of deep centres in semiconductors. Sov. Phys. Solid State 1975, 16, 1200–1203. [Google Scholar]
  26. Markevich, V.; Peaker, A.R.; Murin, L.; Coutinho, J.; Torres, V.J.B.; Jones, R.; Öberg, S.; Briddon, P.; Auret, F.; Abrosimov, N. Electronic properties of vacancy-oxygen complexes in SiGe alloys. Phys. B 2003, 340–342, 790–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mesli, A.; Kolkovsky, V.I.; Dobaczewski, L.; Larsen, A.N.; Abrosimov, N.V. Defects and impurities in SiGe: The effect of alloying. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2006, 253, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. RD50—Radiation Hard Semiconductor Devices for Very High Luminosity Colliders. Available online: www.cern.ch/rd50 (accessed on 25 November 2020).
Figure 1. Evolution of BELIV transients in Si as well as Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes irradiated with 5.5 MeV electrons using various fluences and recorded in dark (a) as well as under 1064 nm wavelength laser illumination. (b) Here, LIV pulses of UP = 12 V and τPL = 48 μs were employed. In the inset (i), the BELIV pulse components are denoted. Please mark the corresponding serial number in the figure.
Figure 1. Evolution of BELIV transients in Si as well as Si0.95Ge0.05 diodes irradiated with 5.5 MeV electrons using various fluences and recorded in dark (a) as well as under 1064 nm wavelength laser illumination. (b) Here, LIV pulses of UP = 12 V and τPL = 48 μs were employed. In the inset (i), the BELIV pulse components are denoted. Please mark the corresponding serial number in the figure.
Sensors 20 06884 g001
Figure 2. The BELIV transients recorded in pristine and electron irradiated Si0.99Ge0.01 diodes using LIV pulses of UP = 12 V and τPL = 470 μs.
Figure 2. The BELIV transients recorded in pristine and electron irradiated Si0.99Ge0.01 diodes using LIV pulses of UP = 12 V and τPL = 470 μs.
Sensors 20 06884 g002
Figure 3. SS-PIS spectra recorded in the electron irradiated Si and SiGe diodes. In the inset (i), the configuration diagram sketched using SS-PI spectra and BELIV estimations, made using Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Figure 3. SS-PIS spectra recorded in the electron irradiated Si and SiGe diodes. In the inset (i), the configuration diagram sketched using SS-PI spectra and BELIV estimations, made using Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Sensors 20 06884 g003
Figure 4. (a) Carrier decay transients recorded by MW-PC technique in Si diodes irradiated with 5.5 MeV electrons collecting different fluence. (b) Carrier lifetimes ascribed to their decay through recombination and trapping centers as a function of electron irradiation fluence in pristine and irradiated Si and SiGe samples (A, B and C, Table 1).
Figure 4. (a) Carrier decay transients recorded by MW-PC technique in Si diodes irradiated with 5.5 MeV electrons collecting different fluence. (b) Carrier lifetimes ascribed to their decay through recombination and trapping centers as a function of electron irradiation fluence in pristine and irradiated Si and SiGe samples (A, B and C, Table 1).
Sensors 20 06884 g004
Figure 5. The MW-PC relaxation transients recorded on Si0.99Ge0.01 (a) and Si0.95Ge0.05 (b) diodes irradiated with 1.6 MeV protons of varied fluence. (c) Carrier recombination lifetime as a function of 1.6 MeV proton fluence in Si0.99Ge0.01 and Si0.95Ge0.05 samples. Here, the MW-PC transients shown in (a,b) were in situ scanned during proton irradiation within stopping range of 1.6 MeV protons.
Figure 5. The MW-PC relaxation transients recorded on Si0.99Ge0.01 (a) and Si0.95Ge0.05 (b) diodes irradiated with 1.6 MeV protons of varied fluence. (c) Carrier recombination lifetime as a function of 1.6 MeV proton fluence in Si0.99Ge0.01 and Si0.95Ge0.05 samples. Here, the MW-PC transients shown in (a,b) were in situ scanned during proton irradiation within stopping range of 1.6 MeV protons.
Sensors 20 06884 g005
Table 1. The diodes under test, made on p-type Si and SiGe material substrates of the same doping.
Table 1. The diodes under test, made on p-type Si and SiGe material substrates of the same doping.
Diode Base MaterialSiSi0.99Ge0.01Si0.95Ge0.05
Diode BatchABC
Pristine Material(Ap) Pristine (Bp) Pristine (Cp) Pristine
5.5 MeV Electron Irradiation Fluences (Ae1)
2 × 1014 e/cm2
(Ae2)
4 × 1014 e/cm2
(Be1)
5 × 1013 e/cm2
(Be2)
2 × 1015 e/cm2
(Ce1)
2 × 1014 e/cm2
(Ce2)
5 × 1014 e/cm2
1.6 MeV Proton Irradiation Fluences (AP1)
0–1015 p/cm2
(BP1)
0–1015 p/cm2
(CP1)
0–1015 p/cm2
Table 2. The doping concentrations evaluated using C-V characteristics.
Table 2. The doping concentrations evaluated using C-V characteristics.
SampleNS (cm−3)NS (cm−3)
in Proton Irradiation Experiments
Diode Base MaterialFluence Φ (e/cm2)
SiPristine (Φ = 0)1.93 × 1014
2 × 10141.76 × 1014
4 × 10141.69 × 1014
Si0.99Ge0.01pristine1.82 × 10156.61 × 1013
5 × 1013n/a
2 × 10151.45 × 1015
Si0.95Ge0.05pristine1.81 × 10142 × 1014
2 × 10141.86 × 1014
5 × 10141.89 × 1014
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ceponis, T.; Deveikis, L.; Lastovskii, S.; Makarenko, L.; Pavlov, J.; Pukas, K.; Rumbauskas, V.; Gaubas, E. Transient Electrical and Optical Characteristics of Electron and Proton Irradiated SiGe Detectors. Sensors 2020, 20, 6884. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236884

AMA Style

Ceponis T, Deveikis L, Lastovskii S, Makarenko L, Pavlov J, Pukas K, Rumbauskas V, Gaubas E. Transient Electrical and Optical Characteristics of Electron and Proton Irradiated SiGe Detectors. Sensors. 2020; 20(23):6884. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236884

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ceponis, Tomas, Laimonas Deveikis, Stanislau Lastovskii, Leonid Makarenko, Jevgenij Pavlov, Kornelijus Pukas, Vytautas Rumbauskas, and Eugenijus Gaubas. 2020. "Transient Electrical and Optical Characteristics of Electron and Proton Irradiated SiGe Detectors" Sensors 20, no. 23: 6884. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236884

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop