Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Digestion and Fecal Fermentation of Polysaccharides from Hawthorn and Its Impacts on Human Gut Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Decay Time Analysis and Radiation Measurement for Quantum-Dot-Based Scintillator’s Characterization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Soybean Peptides on Improving Quality and the ACE Inhibitory Bioactivity of Extruded Rice

1
State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Ministry of Education of China, College of Food Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
2
Tianjin Fresh Food and Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300457, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(10), 1921; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101921
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 22 September 2022

Abstract

:
It is crucial to address the dietary problems of hypertensive patients. The effect and mechanism of different contents of soybean protein on cooking quality and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory action in the extruded rice were firstly investigated. The results showed that the extruded rice with soybean protein possessed the higher taste value (90.32 ± 2.31), hardness (2.65 ± 0.01 g), and good pasting quality (p ≤ 0.05). Meanwhile, the soybean protein notably retarded the starch digestibility; the sample with 6% soybean protein showed the fewest rapidly digestible starch (RDS) content (78.82 ± 0.01 mg g−1) and the most slowly digestible starch (SDS) content (8.97 ± 0.45 mg g−1). Importantly, the ACE inhibition rate improved from 17.09 ± 0.01% to 74.02 ± 0.65% in the 6% soybean protein sample because of the production of peptides. The peptide composition of samples were compared, which showed that the effective ACE-inhibitory peptides usually contain 2~20 amino acids, and Pro, Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, and Ala were the main components. Overall, moderate soybean protein would give a good quality and lower ACE activity in extruded food.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rice is a staple food that supplies globally two-thirds of the population as the primary food staple. In practice, for pursuing delicious taste, the main nutritionally active component of natural rice is lower than brown rice due to over processing [1]. The rice bran layer and rice embryo are usually removed, which results in less bioactive compounds of flavonoids, phenolic acids, vitamin E, gamma-oryzanol, etc. [2]. Hence, various technologies of rice nutrition fortification were developed such as genetically modified organism-based biofortification, genetics breeding intervention, and post-harvest fortification (extrusion, parboiling, dusting, coating, and sonication) [3,4]. Among them, the extrusion technique has been an effective way to enhance the nutrients by adding fruits, vegetables, medicinal materials, and other nutrients or medicinal ingredients in its formula [5].
Generally, the addition of bioactive compounds not only improves nutrition but also gives some new functional properties to the extruded rice [6,7,8]. One bioactive compound, soybean peptide, possesses many functions of immune promotion [9,10], anticoagulation [11], and hypocholesterolemic activities [12]. Meanwhile, heating and pressure of extrusion results in the degradation of the protein to peptides or amino acids, and function highly depends on the peptide structure. Hence, the optimal processing parameters and formula of extruded rice is important for controlling the biological activity of extruded rice.
Meanwhile, hyperglycemia and hypertension are the important health problems in the world [13]. Many special peptides were found using functional food for high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease [14]. Some peptides could inhibit the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity, which is the key enzyme of anti-hypertension [15,16,17,18]. The higher activity of ACE is associated with the higher risk of cardiovascular disease, renal disease and hypertension. For inhibiting the ACE activity, a number of obviously available inhibitory drugs, such as the potent synthetic inhibitory agents Captopril and Lisinopril, have been developed and used widely for the treatment of hypertension [19,20], but the prolonged use of some drugs may cause the progressive side effects [16]. Therefore, safe and nutritious staple food products with inhibitors of ACE need to be developed urgently. However, rare reports on extruded food with anti-hypertensive properties are reported, which were derived from random peptides during extrusion processing. Hence, here, an innovative nutritional fortified rice was developed for anti-hypertensive action by adding soybean protein by using extrusion technology. The effects of soybean protein on taste, palatability, pasting properties, and starch digestibility properties of extruded rice were investigated. Particularly, for illustrating the change rule of soybean protein to random peptides, the difference in the composition and structure of random peptides were analyzed in different soybean protein amounts after extrusion processing. In addition, the main random peptides with ACE inhibition were predicted.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Rice flour was gained from the Tianjin Baiaotai Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China. The rice flour contained 7.5% protein, 71.92% total starch content, and 14.19% moisture content. Soybean protein with more than 90% protein and peptides (≤2000 Da) was purchased from Zhongshi Duqing Shandong Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Heze, China.

2.2. Chemicals

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) from rabbit lung (CAS Number: 9015-82-1), was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (China). Hippuric acid (CAS Number: 495-69-2), Hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (HHL) (CAS Number: 207386-83-2), porcine pancreatic α-amylase (13 U mg−1), and amyloglucosidase (104 U mL−1) were purchased from Shanghai Yuan Ye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Pyridine and benzene sulfonyl chloride (BSC) were gained from the Tianjin Baiaotai Technology Development Co., Ltd., China. Glucose assay kits were purchased from Shanghai Rongsheng Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Chromatography-grade pure water, acetonitrile, formic acid and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were purchased from Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Experimental Methods

2.3.1. Extruded Process

Twin screw extruders (DS32-VII, Saixin Machinery Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) were used in the experiment. The diameter of the screw was 32 mm, and the length of the barrel was 600 mm (length-diameter ratio: 18:75).
A one-factor-at-a-time experiment was performed by adding 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% soybean protein. The extruded process was run at 110 °C of the barrel temperature and 25% moisture content of the material. The 25% moisture content of the material and 110 °C of the barrel temperature was chosen because of the best starch digestibility properties of extruded cooking rice (Supplementary Material Figures S1 and S2). The control group of extruded rice was added with 0% soybean protein. Then, a suitable range of soybean proteins was chosen according to taste value and palatability, pasting characteristics, starch digestibility in vitro, and ACE-inhibitory activity in extruded rice. All samples were gathered for three replicates.
Furthermore, the process variables affecting the peptide extrude rice were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). Three factors were varied viz: barrel temperature, material moisture, and soybean protein, and their effects on the extruded rice was investigated. A central composite design (CCD) of RSM was employed to determine the optimal conditions of extruded rice. Three independent variables were used at specified levels and coded (Table S1). The maximum and minimum values of the independent variables were used that were based on the ability of the twin-screw extruder. The experimental design was arranged with the assistance of the Design-Expert 8.0.6 Trial.

2.3.2. Taste Value and Palatability

The taste value and palatability were measured by a rice taste analyzer (STA-1A, SATAKE Co., Ltd., Hiroshima, Japan) according to previous methods [21]. A total of 30 g samples were placed in a stainless steel pan, subsequently washed with running water for the 30 s, and added 40.5 mL water in the tub, then soaked for 30 min. Next, we transferred the sample to an electric rice cooker and cooked it for 40 min, and lastly kept it warm for 5 min. Finally, 8 g of each sample was transferred to a mold; the hardness, gumminess, balance, and springiness were evaluated.

2.3.3. Pasting Characteristics

The method of analyzing the pasting properties of extruded cooking rice was measured according to the reported method with some modifications, which were assessed by a Rapid Visco analyzer (RVA-4800, New-port Scientific, Sydney, Australia) [22]. A total of 3 g of each sample was slurred with 25 mL distilled water in an aluminum Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) tank. The mixture was stirred at 960 rpm for 10 s before measurement and then changed to 160 rpm. RVA test processing followed the standard heating mode procedure: 50 °C for 1 min, 95 °C (12 °C/min) for 5 min, then 50 °C (12 °C/min) for 2.5 min.

2.3.4. Starch Digestibility In Vitro

The starch digestibility in vitro of extruded cooking rice was conducted following the previous method with some modifications [23]. Simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) was composed of 1 mL amyloglucosidase in 2 mL of deionized water, and the pancreatin supernatant was prepared by centrifuging (10 min at 2918× g) the solution of porcine pancreatic α-amylase that was obtained by 3.89 g of porcine pancreatic α-amylase in 25.7 mL deionized water (pH 7.0). The enzyme solution was served by mixing 18.7 mL pancreatin supernatant and 1 mL of diluted amyloglucosidase. The sample was composed by mixing five balls (10 mm in diameter) and 20 mL of acetate buffer; then, the reaction mixture (pH 5.2) was incubated for 30 min at 95 °C. After the addition of the enzyme solution the sample was incubated in a 37 °C shaking water bath. Aliquots of 1 mL were withdrawn at 0, 20, and 120 min of digestion and mixed with 5 mL of ethanol; the released glucose content was measured using the GOPOD kits. Most starches contain a rapidly digestible portion (RDS, hydrolyzed within 20 min), a slowly digestible portion (SDS, hydrolyzed between 20 and 120 min), and a portion that is resistant to digestion (RS, not hydrolyzed after 120 min).

2.3.5. ACE-Inhibitory Activity Analysis

Hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (HHL) was used as an artificial substrate to measure the ACE activity, and the amount of produced hippuric acid (HA) was determined according to the method of [24], with slight modifications. We dissolved 1 g of sample in 5 mL borate buffer solution (BBS) containing 300 mM NaCl (pH 8.2) to prepare inhibitor solutions, which was then agitated on a vortex mixer at 1500 rpm for 1 min, and then centrifuged for 10 min at 4085× g. The substrate solution (5 mM) was prepared by dissolving 25 mg HHL in 11.26 mL BBS, containing 300 mM NaCl (pH 8.2). Then, 50 μL HHL (5 mM) was added to 125 μL of inhibitor solution containing 300 mM NaCl (pH 8.2). Subsequently, 25 μL of the ACE (0.1 U/mL) was added, and the reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, 200 μL HCl (1 M) was added to stop the reaction. A total of 0.4 mL of pyridine was added followed by 0.2 mL of benzene sulfonyl chloride (BSC), mixed evenly for 1 min, and cooled on ice. The absorbance was measured at 410 nm.

2.3.6. Identification and Analysis of Endogenous Polypeptides by LC-MS/MS

The composition of endogenous peptides in soybean was identified by LC-MS/MS according to the previous report [25] with slight modifications. Endogenous polypeptides were extracted by the ultrasonic method with 1% formic acid (model: pulse on 5 s; pulse off 15 s; power 180 W). After the extract was centrifugated at 12,000× g for 30 min successively, the supernatant was collected for ultrafiltration. Sep-Pak C18 was then used to desalt the sample. The column was equilibrated with 500 μL 0.1% TFA and 1% acetonitrile before sample loading. Then, 200 μL 0.1% TFA and 0.5% acetonitrile were used to desalt. The elution procedure was carried out using 300 μL 0.1% TFA and 80% acetonitrile. The obtained desalted samples were then freeze-dried.
The samples were separated by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography (NanoAcuity UPLC; Waters Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a nanometer. The eluents were: 0.1% formic acid in MilliQ-treated (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). The samples were dissolved in 200 μL A, and 2 μL samples were absorbed by the automatic sampler, then sent to the collecting column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 100 µm × 20 mm; Thermo Scientific and Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a flow rate of 10 L/min for 2 min. The samples on the capture column were separated by chromatography on the analysis column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 75 µm × 250 mm; Thermo Scientific and Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The relative liquid gradient was as follows: the elution gradient started with 5% B and increased to 30% B in 105 min. The mobile phase composition was raised from 30% B to 90% B in 5 min. It was maintained at 90% B for 2 min then decreased to 5% in 1 min and maintained at 5% B for 7 min. The samples were eluted with blank solvent for 30 min in mobile phase gradient once.
The ESI source operated with the following parameters: curtain gas was 35 psi; ion spray voltage was 2.0 kV; heating capillary temperature was 300 °C; ion source gas 1 was 40 psi; gas 2 was 50 psi.
The data dependence mode was adopted to automatically switch between MS and MS/MS. The Level 1 scan used Orbitrap, the scan range was set at m/z 350–1600, and the resolution was set 70,000 (m/z 200). Maximum ion introduction time was 50 ms, automatic gain control (AGC) was set at 3 × 106. The top 10 parent ions which conformed to cascade (MS/MS) fragmentation conditions were fractured using Higher Energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) and scanned by Orbitrap at a resolution of 17,500. The scanning range was automatically controlled according to the mass charge ratio of parent ions, and the scanning range was fixed at m/z = 200–2000. The minimum ionic strength value for MS/MS was set at 50,000. In MS/MS, the maximum ion introduction time was 100 ms, AGC control was set to 1.0 × 105, and the parent ion selection window was set 2 Da. For ions with 2, 3 and 4 charge numbers, MS/MS collection was carried out, and dynamic exclusion was set to take place during MS/MS within 10 s for each parent ion, followed by an exclusion time of 30 s.
Uniprot database (Species Glycine Max, Entires 85843, http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/?query=taxonomy:3847) (accessed on 2 September 2021). All the raw nano-LC-MS/MS data were analyzed by MaxQuant software (version 1.6.5.0, http://www.coxdocs.org/doku.php?id=maxquant:start) (accessed on 2 September 2021) for the database search [26]. For quantitative analysis, we used the IBAQ algorithm.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All the treatments were analyzed for three replicates. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the experimental data by SPSS 13.0 software. All data are expressed by mean ± standard deviation. LSD tests were performed to significance level analysis, in which the p ≤ 0.05 was recognized as the significance level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Soybean Protein Contents on the Taste and Palatability of Extruded Cooking Rice

The effects of different soybean protein contents on the taste and palatability of extruded cooking rice are shown in Figure 1. The taste value was significantly increased in extruded rice with soybean protein when compared to the control, which possessed the maximum value (90.32 ± 2.31) in extruded rice with 8% soybean protein (Figure 1A). For the hardness, gumminess, and balance, they first increased and then decreased with the increase of soybean protein content (Figure 1B). The extruded rice with 2% soybean protein had the maximum hardness. Meanwhile, the samples with 4% soybean protein had the highest balance values and gumminess than other groups. However, springiness had no significant correlation with soybean protein (Figure 1B). Overall, these data suggested that the samples with soybean protein (4~8%) could possess a good taste and texture in extruded cooking rice.
Taste value is an important indicator for assessing the eating quality of extruded cooking rice. At the same time, the taste value of extruded cooking rice was greater than 70 taste values, which indicates a super taste quality [27]. Usually, the amylose content and crystallinity are considered to be momentous factors that lead to differences in the eating quality of rice [28,29]. The higher the amylose content, the lower the taste value. Here, the taste value was affected by soybean protein content, which may be because of lower amylose and the interaction of protein and starch in extruded cooking rice [30].

3.2. Effect of Soybean Protein Contents on the Pasting Properties of Extruded Cooking Rice

The pasting properties of samples by Rapid Visco Analysis (RVA) are shown in Table 1. Overall, extruded rice with different doses of soybean protein expressed a gradual decrease in the peak viscosity, through viscosity, breakdown viscosity, and final viscosity, except for the through and final viscosity in the samples with 2% soybean protein. Meanwhile, there was a remarkably lower breakdown viscosity in the sample with 2% soybean protein than in the sample with 4% soybean protein (p ≤ 0.05). In detail, a slight decrease in viscosity was observed (soybean protein content ≤ 4%), followed by a sharp decrease (soybean protein content ≥ 6%). However, the pasting temperature and setback viscosity were gradually increased with more soybean protein content. The extruded cooking rice with 8% soybean protein had the minimum pasting time (5.09 ± 0.31), and a sharp increase was observed in 10% soybean protein extruded rice (6.25 ± 0.30). Overall, these data suggested that the samples with soybean protein (6~8%) could possess good pasting properties in extruded cooking rice.
As is well known, the pasting properties are linked to the potential molecular interactions in rice [31]. It has been proved that setback viscosity not only depends on amylose content but also on the number of amylose chains and the size of the molecules of amylopectin [32]. The lower breakdown viscosity may be due to the structural remodeling of the branch chains of amylopectin for soybean protein extruded cooking rice, which led to the inhibition of starch pasting [33,34]. Agreeing with previous studies in natural rice, the breakdown viscosity expressed the consistent trend of gumminess [35]. Here, soybean random peptides can restrict starch swelling and retard starch gelatinization; the samples with soybean protein had the lower peak viscosity, through viscosity, and final viscosity, which may result from the soybean protein restricting the starch granules’ swelling during gelatinization [18,36]. Moreover, the heating and pressure during the extrusion process promotes the protein–starch interactions, which expose multifarious hydrophobic amino acids (e.g., Pro, Leu, Ile, Val, and Phe) (Table 2). The pasting temperature was improved because these small molecules could be attached or embedded to granular surfaces or intervals of starch by hydrogen bonds or hydrophobic interactions [37]. To sum up, soybean protein reduced the pasting capacity of extruded rice starches owing to the production of a more compact structure, which finally inhibited the gelatinization of starch and reduced the viscosity.

3.3. Effect of Soybean Protein Contents on the Starch Digestibility Properties of Extruded Cooking Rice

Significant changes of RDS, SDS, and RS with the addition of soybean protein are shown in Figure 2. Interestingly, the SDS contents had gradually increased with the increase of soybean protein content until the content was up to 10%. Notably, at the sample of 6% soybean protein, RDS was the minimum (78.82 ± 0.10 mg/g), and SDS reached the maximum (8.97 ± 0.45 mg/g). Meanwhile, RDS contents decreased in all soybean-containing samples when compared to the control, except for the sample with 2%. Nevertheless, with the soybean protein increasing, the RS contents of extruded rice were slightly lower than control group (p ≤ 0.05). On the whole, the samples with soybean protein of 6% had greater effects on the starch digestibility of extruded rice by increasing SDS content. This finding supported the idea that a higher soybean protein amount results in lower starch digestibility, which is consistent with previous studies [18,38].
As is known to all, high glycemic index (GI) foods are closely related to starch digestibility, which could cause the change of amylopectin to amylose in starch granules during the extruding process [39,40]. The lower the GI of foods, the higher the contents of SDS and RS. The increase of SDS could regulate the body’s blood glucose response, enhance the nutritional constituent of foods in diabetic patients, and retard the digestion of rice starch [41,42]. Simultaneously, some interactions between amino acids or peptides and starch will partially restrict the hydrolysis of starch [43]. Moreover, proteins or random peptides are easier to interact or combine with α-amylase for reducing its catalytic activity then directly inhibiting the digestion of starch [40,44]. Here, proteins or peptides may be effectively glued to starch granules, forming a barrier surrounding starch granules, which reduces the starch digestibility rate by increasing the steric hindrance, delaying the internal contact point of the interaction between amylase and starch.

3.4. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Analysis

The optimal extrusion process of extruded cooking rice was determined by taking the taste and balance values as the response values (Table S2).
The following quadratic polynomial regression equation for the taste value:
Y (eating value) = 93 − 0.37A + 1.25B + 0.88C + 1.75AB − 0.75BC − 7A2 − 4.75B2 − 0.5C2.
The following quadratic polynomial regression equation for the balance value:
Y (balance value) = 035 + 0.021A − 1.00 × 10−2B + 0.011C + 0.025AB + 2.500 × 10−3AC − 0.066A2 − 0.12B2 − 0.046C2.
The variance analysis of items of regression equations on eating values and balance values are shown in Table S3 and Table S4, respectively. The response surface plot and contour plot of the interactive effects of soybean protein content, moisture content, and barrel temperature on taste values and balance values are shown in Figure S4 and Figure S5, respectively. Results showed that the predicted process conditions of the regression model analysis obtained by software Design-Expert 8.0 were basically close to each other, taking the taste value and balance value as the response surface within the range of selected factors, indicating that the evaluation results of each factor are basically consistent. Combined with the actual test operation, the optimal extrusion process was determined as follows: 6% soybean protein, 25% material moisture, and barrel temperature of 110 °C, which has the highest taste value (93) and balance value (0.35).

3.5. ACE Inhibitory Action In Vitro of Different Soybean Protein Contents

ACE activity is one of the major therapies for treating hypertension, which shows a direct association with diastolic blood pressure. It was obvious that the ACE inhibition rate of extruded rice with soybean protein (2~10%) was significantly higher (>74.02 ± 0.65%). than the sample of non-soybean protein (17.09 ± 0.01%) (Figure 3) (p ≤ 0.05), and the ACE inhibition rate of extruded rice was significantly higher than naturally grown rice, which was only 0.03 ± 0.01% (p ≤ 0.05). Of note, there were no dose effects of the soybean protein content on the ACE inhibition rate (Figure 3). Probably, the retention rate and transformation rate of soybean peptide in the samples was high, which needs to be further explored. Fortunately, the ACE inhibition rate of extruded rice with soybean protein was significantly higher than the sample of non-soybean protein and ordinary rice, which maybe was because of the presence of bioactive peptides [45,46].
Inhibiting the ACE activity level is consistent with decreasing diastolic blood pressure [47]. So, the extruded rice with soybean protein or peptides may be a promising candidate as ACE inhibitor staple food for patients with hypertension [40].

3.6. Peptides Molecular Change of Different Soybean Protein Content during Extrusion

Why does extruded rice have ACE inhibitory action? For illustrating this point, LC-MS/MS was used to identify the difference of molecular changes of the soybean protein in extruded rice. The extruded rice with 6% soybean protein was adopted based on its better ACE inhibition rate and appearance, taste, palatability, and pasting quality. The peptides composition and amino acid sequence were demonstrated in Figure S3 and Table S5. There were 155 peptide sequences in the soybean protein powder (Figure S3A), and 150 peptide sequences in soybean protein extruded rice (Figure S3B), whereas only 19 peptide sequences were found in extruded rice (0% soybean protein) (Figure S3C). From Table 2, the soybean protein power contained a large number of key amino acids in the composition of bioactive polypeptides of ACE inhibitory activity. Here, emerging evidence suggests that the most effective ACE-inhibitory peptides usually contain 2~20 amino acids. In this research, Pro, Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, and Ala were the main components. Additionally, the proportion of small peptides of about 8~13 amino acids was 72% (112/155) and 80% (121/150) in soybean protein and the extruded rice with soybean protein, respectively, but there were few of these kinds of peptides in extruded rice with 0% soybean protein, which is in line with previous research [48]. All these results revealed that as the molecular weight of peptides tends to reduce, more small peptides were produced during the extrusion. Hence, the difference between bioactive peptides may be the main reason for the ACE inhibitory activity, because of the lower amount of small peptides with ACE inhibition properties.
The physicochemical properties and biological activities of peptides are related to chain length, molecular weight, amino acid composition, and sequence [49,50]. It has been reported that peptides in soybean protein may be depolymerized, degraded, conversed, and modified during extrusion processes [51]. Generally, potent ACE inhibitory peptides are short peptides, and their C-terminal plays a key role in their inhibitory activity. According to the AHTPDB database, peptides containing Tyr, Pro, Try, Phe, and Leu at the C-terminal have been elucidated as effective ACE inhibitor peptides. Some ACE inhibitory peptides were also reported by previous research, such as IRW, IPP, VPP, VLPVP, HLPLP, IVGRPRHQG and so on [15,52,53]. In addition, heating during extrusion results in protein segment degradation into small molecular peptides and the production a large number of hydrophobic amino acids, which enhances the biological activity for ACE [54,55]. In this study, the main hydrophobic amino acids, such as Pro, Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, Ala, Trp, and Tyr (Table 2), accounted for 38.8% of the 8~13 amino acid sequence. The inhibition of ACE is achieved by hydrophobic peptides which have a high affinity for the active sub-sites of ACE, block the reaction of angiotensin-I and kinin with angiotensin-converting enzyme, and inhibit the generation of angiotensin-II and sustained-release peptide, thus lowering blood pressure. Particularly, proline, as a branched-chain amino acid and aromatic amino acid, could enhance the ACE inhibition rate, which is promoted in more kinds of peptides in the soybean protein rice samples [56,57,58].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we first reported and analyzed the effect of soybean protein on cooking quality and ACE inhibitory action by increasing bioactive peptides in the extrusion rice. The results revealed that the optimal amount of soybean protein (6%) could not only give a higher taste value but also improve ACE inhibitory activity and decrease the starch digestibility rate of extruded cooking rice. Meanwhile, multifarious hydrophobic amino acids (e.g., Pro, Leu, Ile, Val, and Phe) were exposed during the heating extruded process. As a whole, small peptides may act as a vital factor in the function of extruded rice for ACE inhibitory activity. The extruded rice with soybean protein could provide a very good novel staple food for people, and includes many soybean peptides with ACE inhibitory bioactivity. This search provides a basis for functional extrusion food research in hypoglycemic and anti-hypertensive people.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr10101921/s1, Figure S1: Starch digestibility in vitro extruded cooking rice with different material moisture contents. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05); Figure S2: Starch digestibility in vitro extruded cooking rice with different barrel temperatures. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05); Figure S3: Peptides composition and amino acid sequences of samples tested by LC-MS/MS. (A) The total Ions Chromatography of SP, (B) the total Ions Chromatography of extruded rice (6% SP), (C) the total Ions Chromatography of extruded rice (0% SP); Figure S4: Response surface plot and contour plot showing the interactive effects of soybean protein content, moisture content, and barrel temperature on taste value; Figure S5: Response surface plot and contour plot showing the interactive effects of soybean protein content, moisture content, and barrel temperature on balance value. Table S1: Factors and levels of response surface experiments; Table S2: Factors and levels in the response surface design arrangement and experimental results; Table S3: Variance analysis of items of regression equation on taste value; Table S4: Variance analysis of items of regression equation on balance value; Table S5: Peptides composition and amino acid sequences of samples tested by LC-MS/MS.

Author Contributions

Writing-original draft preparation, methodology, software, and visualization, data curation, S.H.; formal analysis, investigation, J.Z. (Jiafeng Zhao); data curation, visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, J.Z. (Jiaxuan Zheng); investigation, C.W.; conceptualization, writing—review and editing, resources, validation, project administration, funding acquisition, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the 123 Industry Integration Development Science and Technology Demonstration Project (17ZXYENC00160).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, S.; Benchamas, G.; Huang, G. Whole processing and use of rice polishings. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 2020, 63, 102373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Min, B.; Mcclung, A.M.; Chen, M. Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Capacities in Rice Brans of Different Color. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, C117–C126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Descalsota-Empleo, G.I.; Amparado, A.; Inabangan-Asilo, M.A.; Tesoro, F.; Stangoulis, J.; Reinke, R.; Mallikarjuna Swamy, B.P. Genetic mapping of QTL for agronomic traits and grain mineral elements in rice. Crop J. 2019, 7, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tiozon, R.J.N.; Fernie, A.R.; Sreenivasulu, N. Meeting human dietary vitamin requirements in the staple rice via strategies of biofortification and post-harvest fortification. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dalbhagat, C.G.; Mahato, D.K.; Mishra, H.N. Effect of extrusion processing on physicochemical, functional and nutritional characteristics of rice and rice-based products: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 85, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharif, M.K.; Rizvi, S.S.H.; Paraman, I. Characterization of supercritical fluid extrusion processed rice-soy crisps fortified with micronutrients and soy protein. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 56, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ravindran, G.; Carr, A.; Hardacre, A. A comparative study of the effects of three galactomannans on the functionality of extruded pea-rice blends. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1620–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brennan, C.; Brennan, M.; Derbyshire, E.; Tiwari, B.K. Effects of extrusion on the polyphenols, vitamins and antioxidant activity of foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Suetsuna, K.; Yamauchi, F. Isolation and characterization of immunostimulative peptides from soybean. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1995, 6, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsuruki, T.; Kishi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Tanaka, M.; Matsukawa, T.; Yoshikawa, M. Soymetide, an immunostimulating peptide derived from soybean β-conglycinin, is an fMLP agonist. FEBS Lett. 2003, 540, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yimit, D.; Hoxur, P.; Amat, N.; Uchikawa, K.; Yamaguchi, N. Effects of soybean peptide on immune function, brain function, and neurochemistry in healthy volunteers. Nutrition 2012, 28, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tovar, A.R.; Murguia, F.; Cruz, C.; Hernandez-Pando, R.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J.; Correa-Rotter, R.; Torres, N. A soy protein diet alters hepatic lipid metabolism gene expression and reduces serum lipids and renal fibrogenic cytokines in rats with chronic nephrotic syndrome. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2562–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gallego, M.; Mora, L.; Toldrá, F. Health relevance of antihypertensive peptides in foods. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 19, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bejjani, S.; Wu, J. Transport of IRW, an Ovotransferrin-Derived Antihypertensive Peptide, in Human Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, J.; Mikiashvili, N.; Bonku, R.; Smith, I.N. Allergenicity, antioxidant activity and ACE-inhibitory activity of protease hydrolyzed peanut flour. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 129992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bhatti, M.S.; Asiri, Y.I.; Uddin, J.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Musharraf, S.G. Repurposing of pharmaceutical drugs by high-throughput approach for antihypertensive activity as inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) using HPLC-ESI-MS/MS method. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sharifi, A.M.; Akbarloo, N.; Darabi, R.; Larijani, B. Study of correlation between elevation of blood pressure and tissue ACE activity during development of hypertension in 1K1C rats. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2004, 41, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, X.; Luo, J.; Fu, L.; Cai, D.; Lu, X.; Liang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Li, L. Structural, physicochemical, and digestibility properties of starch-soybean peptide complex subjected to heat moisture treatment. Food Chem. 2019, 297, 124957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lapointe, N.; Rouleau, J. Activation of vascular tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in heart failure: Effects of ACE inhibitors. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Ye, R.; Wu, Y.; Xia, W. Comparison of analytical methods to assay inhibitors of angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 3329–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, T.; Zhou, B.; Yang, H.; Qiao, L. Enrichment of soybean dietary fiber and protein fortified rice grain by dry flour extrusion cooking: The physicochemical, pasting, taste, palatability, cooking and starch digestibility properties. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 22669–26682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Champagne, E.T.; Bett, K.L.; Vinyard, B.T.; Mcclung, A.M.; Barton, F.E.; Moldenhauer, K.; Linscombe, S.; McKenzie, K. Correlation Between Cooked Rice Texture and Rapid Visco Analyser Measurements. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Englyst, H.N.; Kingman, S.M.; Cummings, J.H. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992, 46 (Suppl. S2), S33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Jimsheena, V.K.; Gowda, L.R. Colorimetric, High-Throughput Assay for Screening Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 9388–9394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Perkins, D.N.; Pappin, D.J.; Creasy, D.M.; Cottrell, J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cox, J.; Mann, M.; Matic, I.; Hilger, M.; Nagaraj, N.; Selbach, M.; Olsen, J.V. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, H.; Chen, D.; He, L.; Wang, T.; Lu, H.; Yang, F.; Deng, F.; Chen, Y.; Tao, Y.; Li, M.; et al. Correlation of taste values with chemical compositions and Rapid Visco Analyser profiles of 36 indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, S.; Cik, T.; Lii, C.; Lai, P.; Chen, H. Effect of amylose content on structure, texture and α-amylase reactivity of cooked rice. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Okadome, H.N.F.R. Application of instrument-based multiple texture measurement of cooked milled-rice grains to rice quality evaluation. JARQ Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 2005, 39, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tao, K.; Yu, W.; Prakash, S.; Gilbert, R.G. High-amylose rice: Starch molecular structural features controlling cooked rice texture and preference. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Park, I.M.; Ibáñez, A.M.; Zhong, F.; Shoemaker, C.F. Gelatinization and Pasting Properties of Waxy and Non-waxy Rice Starches. Starch-Stärke 2007, 59, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tao, K.; Li, C.; Yu, W.; Gilbert, R.G.; Li, E. How amylose molecular fine structure of rice starch affects functional properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 204, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bhat, F.M.; Riar, C.S. Effect of composition, granular morphology and crystalline structure on the pasting, textural, thermal and sensory characteristics of traditional rice cultivars. Food Chem. 2019, 280, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Horibata, T.F.U.H.; Nakamoto, M.; Fuwa, H.; Inouchi, N. Structural and physicochemical characteristics of endosperm starches of rice cultivars recently bred in Japan. J. Appl. Glycosci. JAG 2004, 51, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tao, K.; Yu, W.; Prakash, S.; Gilbert, R.G. Investigating cooked rice textural properties by instrumental measurements. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2020, 9, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chung, H.; Liu, Q.; Lee, L.; Wei, D. Relationship between the structure, physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of rice starches with different amylose contents. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, X.; He, X.; Fu, X.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Q. Complexation of rice starch/flour and maize oil through heat moisture treatment: Structural, in vitro digestion and physicochemical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hasjim, J.; Lavau, G.C.; Gidley, M.J.; Gilbert, R.G. In Vivo and In Vitro Starch Digestion: Are Current In Vitro Techniques Adequate? Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 3600–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Piecyk, M.; Drużyńska, B.; Worobiej, E.; Wołosiak, R.; Ostrowska-Ligęza, E. Effect of hydrothermal treatment of runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus) seeds and starch isolation on starch digestibility. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zou, W.; Schulz, B.L.; Tan, X.; Sissons, M.; Warren, F.J.; Gidley, M.J.; Gilbert, R.G. The role of thermostable proteinaceous α-amylase inhibitors in slowing starch digestion in pasta. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 90, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tuaño, A.P.P.; Barcellano, E.C.G.; Rodriguez, M.S. Resistant starch levels and in vitro starch digestibility of selected cooked Philippine brown and milled rices varying in apparent amylose content and glycemic index. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2021, 2, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Aalim, H.; Wang, D.; Luo, Z. Black rice (Oryza sativa L.) processing: Evaluation of physicochemical properties, in vitro starch digestibility, and phenolic functions linked to type 2 diabetes. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 109898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lu, X.; Chang, R.; Lu, H.; Ma, R.; Qiu, L.; Tian, Y. Effect of amino acids composing rice protein on rice starch digestibility. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 146, 111417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chi, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, L. Understanding the mechanism of starch digestion mitigation by rice protein and its enzymatic hydrolysates. Food Hydrocolloid. 2018, 84, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garcia-Mora, P.; Frias, J.; Peñas, E.; Zieliński, H.; Giménez-Bastida, J.A.; Wiczkowski, W.; Zielińska, D.; Martínez-Villaluenga, C. Simultaneous release of peptides and phenolics with antioxidant, ACE-inhibitory and anti-inflammatory activities from pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. pinto) proteins by subtilisins. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hall, F.; Johnson, P.E.; Liceaga, A. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on bioactive properties and allergenicity of cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus) protein. Food Chem. 2018, 262, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Firouzabadi, N.; Tajik, N.; Shafiei, M.; Ebrahimi, S.A.; Bakhshandeh, H. Interaction of A-240T and A2350G related genotypes of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is associated with decreased serum ACE activity and blood pressure in a healthy Iranian population. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 668, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, S.Y.; Hur, S.J. Antihypertensive peptides from animal products, marine organisms, and plants. Food Chem. 2017, 228, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Najafian, L.; Babji, A.S. A review of fish-derived antioxidant and antimicrobial peptides: Their production, assessment, and applications. Peptides 2012, 33, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daskaya-Dikmen, C.; Yucetepe, A.; Karbancioglu-Guler, F.; Daskaya, H.; Ozcelik, B. Angiotensin-I-Converting Enzyme (ACE)-Inhibitory Peptides from Plants. Nutrients 2017, 9, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, E.; Campanella, O.H.; Ye, X.; Jin, Z.; Liu, D.; Bemiller, J.N. Advances in conversion of natural biopolymers: A reactive extrusion (REX)–enzyme-combined strategy for starch/protein-based food processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Martin, M.; Deussen, A. Effects of natural peptides from food proteins on angiotensin converting enzyme activity and hypertension. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2019, 59, 1264–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Quirós, A.; Dávalos, A.; Lasunción, M.A.; Ramos, M.; Recio, I. Bioavailability of the antihypertensive peptide LHLPLP: Transepithelial flux of HLPLP. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, P.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Massounga Bora, A.F.; Li, X.; Zhao, M.; Hao, X.; Wang, Y. Antioxidant activity of Cheddar cheese during its ripening time and after simulated gastrointestinal digestion as affected by probiotic bacteria. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stuknytė, M.; Cattaneo, S.; Masotti, F.; De Noni, I. Occurrence and fate of ACE-inhibitor peptides in cheeses and in their digestates following in vitro static gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2015, 168, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fu, Y.; Young, J.F.; Løkke, M.M.; Lametsch, R.; Aluko, R.E.; Therkildsen, M. Revalorisation of bovine collagen as a potential precursor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides based on in silico and in vitro protein digestions. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 24, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jung, W.; Mendis, E.; Je, J.; Park, P.; Son, B.W.; Kim, H.C.; Choi, Y.K.; Kim, S.-K. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide from yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera) frame protein and its antihypertensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aluko, R.E. Structure and function of plant protein-derived antihypertensive peptides. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 4, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of different soybean protein contents on the quality of extruded cooking rice. (A) Taste; (B) hardness, gumminess, balance, and springiness. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of different soybean protein contents on the quality of extruded cooking rice. (A) Taste; (B) hardness, gumminess, balance, and springiness. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Processes 10 01921 g001
Figure 2. Starch digestibility in vitro extruded cooking rice with different soybean protein additions. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. Starch digestibility in vitro extruded cooking rice with different soybean protein additions. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Processes 10 01921 g002
Figure 3. ACE inhibition rate of samples. Ordinary rice and extruded cooking rice with different soybean protein additions. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. ACE inhibition rate of samples. Ordinary rice and extruded cooking rice with different soybean protein additions. Values are means ± SD. Values followed by the same letters in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Processes 10 01921 g003
Table 1. Pasting properties extruded cooking rice with different levels of SP.
Table 1. Pasting properties extruded cooking rice with different levels of SP.
SP (%)Peak Visc.Trough Visc.Breakdown Visc.Final Visc.Setback Visc.Pasting Temp.
0115.52 ± 9.9 a56.72 ± 9.77 a59.95 ± 5.62 a103.08 ± 2.56 a−13.32 ± 7.53 d67.82 ± 7.60 a
294.29 ± 9.28 b58.87 ± 9.97 a38.44 ± 2.77 c106.53 ± 2.29 a15.40 ± 4.93 b67.94 ± 7.63 a
496.94 ± 4.98 b49.65 ± 9.08 a47.79 ± 3.43 b93.24 ± 2.81 b−1.40 ± 8.45 c68.07 ± 6.94 a
679.11 ± 4.84 c45.58 ± 9.74 ab27.07 ± 2.68 d84.93 ± 4.72 c6.66 ± 5.42 bc68.90 ± 7.08 ab
856.12 ± 4.81 d30.74 ± 10.02 b19.13 ± 3.53 e69.90 ± 4.58 d15.86 ± 4.86 b72.45 ± 7.44 b
1040.06 ± 5.03 e29.55 ± 10.14 b7.93 ± 5.43 f72.79 ± 2.87 d35.63 ± 5.09 a74.25 ± 6.90 b
All the values are the mean ± SD. Values with different letters within a column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 as evaluated by Tukey’s test to analyze the different soybean protein contents in the same column.
Table 2. Peptide composition and characteristics of samples.
Table 2. Peptide composition and characteristics of samples.
No.Sequence LengthNo. of TypeRelative Amount (%)ProLeuIleValPheAlaTrpTyr
Sample 1: SP
1853.22692261020
291811.61318141164426
3103321.2905523191681227
4112516.12943151611151432
5121710.9683413141114411
613149.0322510141111413
71485.161204936001
81585.161188678212
91653.226194103020
101742.58167413101
111831.935160114121
122042.581230116120
132153.226232337221
142242.581135327101
152310.64560002000
162510.64560002000
Sample 2: extruded rice (6% SP)
1874.66794124001
292718.000321513139871
3103523.333442213241316141
4112818.66736161320151622
512149.3332097126701
613106.667126672303
71496.000113793012
81542.66792222000
91621.33360220000
101810.66711001000
111921.333120202000
122010.66700000000
132142.667210215000
142242.667210205000
152310.66760002000
162510.66760002000
Sample 3: extruded rice (0% SP)
18421.05342012010
29526.31680310001
310736.84286310540
411210.52640111100
51215.26310110000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, S.; Zhao, J.; Zu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, X. The Effect of Soybean Peptides on Improving Quality and the ACE Inhibitory Bioactivity of Extruded Rice. Processes 2022, 10, 1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101921

AMA Style

Hou S, Zhao J, Zu Y, Zheng J, Wang C, Liu X. The Effect of Soybean Peptides on Improving Quality and the ACE Inhibitory Bioactivity of Extruded Rice. Processes. 2022; 10(10):1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hou, Shuangdi, Jiafeng Zhao, Yuan Zu, Jiaxuan Zheng, Chunyu Wang, and Xia Liu. 2022. "The Effect of Soybean Peptides on Improving Quality and the ACE Inhibitory Bioactivity of Extruded Rice" Processes 10, no. 10: 1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101921

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop