Next Article in Journal
Shelf Life and Storage Conditions of Universal Adhesives: A Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanopatterned Polymer Molds Using Anodized Aluminum Templates for Anti-Reflective Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Evaluation of Polyphenylsulfone (PPSF) Powders as Fire-Retardant Materials for Processing by Selective Laser Sintering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adsorption Characteristics of Polymer Solutions on Media Surfaces and Their Main Influencing Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Thermosensitive Interfacial Migration of 5-FU in the Microenvironment of Pluronic Block Copolymers

1
Department of Fiber and Composite Materials, Feng Chia University, Taichung 407, Taiwan
2
Master’s Program of Electrical and Communications Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 407, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(16), 2705; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162705
Submission received: 13 July 2021 / Revised: 9 August 2021 / Accepted: 11 August 2021 / Published: 13 August 2021

Abstract

:
Chemotherapy is one of the most important ways to treat cancer. At present, chemotherapy medicines are mainly administered by intravenous injection or oral administration. However, systemic medical care requires the dosage of high concentrations of drugs to defeat the malignant tumor growth. In recent years, the use of polymer composites for local and sustained drug release has become an important field of research to minimize side effects due to high-concentration chemotherapy drugs. Here, 19F-{1H} heteronuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (HOESY) was used to study the micellular environment of the F-containing chemotherapeutic drug 5-FU in Pluronic F127, Pluronic L121, and F127/L121 binary blending composites. The distribution of 5-FU in micelles is related to the PEO and PPO segment length of Pluronic polymers and the environmental temperature. The drug release tests further confirm that if 5-FU medicines were loaded in the PPO segment inside the micelles, the purpose of the prolonged drug release carrier is achieved.

1. Introduction

The fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is an antimetabolite drug that is widely used for cancer treatment in the abdominal cavity [1]. Increased understanding of the mechanism of 5-FU has led to the development of its anticancer activity. However, 5-FU has a chemical structure similar to uracil and thymine and interferes with nucleotide synthesis and incorporates into DNA, which may have a mutational impact on both surviving tumor and healthy cells [2]. Additionally, 5-FU could trigger cancer cell-initiated anti-tumor immunity to reduce the tumor burden, and to improve therapeutic effectiveness for colon and other cancers [3]. Despite these advances, drug resistance remains a significant limitation to the clinical use of 5-FU [4]. To design a comprehensive and effective 5-FU drug delivery system for targeting tumors would be a part of precision medicine.
The poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) block copolymer (PEO-PPO-PEO) (commercially available as Pluronics and Poloxamers) is an amphiphilic block copolymer that can self-assembly into micelles in aqueous solution. Enormous study shown that the micellular structure is a practical approach for incorporating medicines, as it not only builds a drug delivery system but also applies to gene and cancer therapies [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The key attribute for the biological activity of Pluronic block copolymers is their ability to interact with multidrug-resistant cancer tumors with respect to various anticancer agents both in vitro and in vivo [11,12,13].
Studies of Pluronic F127 have been carried out in transparent flowing solution at ambient temperature, but it became a hydrogel at body temperatures above 30 °C [14]. This Pluronic F127 sol-gel transformation with 5-FU loading is able to effectively induce the death of gastric cancer cells using a hollow microneedle injection [15]. Interactions between non-ionic micelles (not limited to Pluronic block copolymers) and small molecules (not limited to 5-FU) can be found in the literature too [16,17]. Further, binary mixing of Pluronic F127 and Pluronic L121 produces tiny micelles that satisfy the stability criteria by demonstrating appropriate thermodynamic and kinetic stability in biologically relevant media as pharmaceutical ingredients [18].
Here, the characterization of 5-FU in Pluronic F127, Pluronic L121, and their binary mixing was studied by 19F-{1H} heteronuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (HOESY). When the fluorine-19 nuclei were irradiated on 5-FU in the NMR, the identified polarization of hydrogen-1 nuclei could only be detected in the range of 6 Å from the fluorine-19 nuclei. The utilization of dipolar coupling (i.e., cross-relaxation) presents the distribution of 5-FU medicine loading and its interfacial movement in the Pluronic micelles. The main results can significantly increase the understanding of drug delivery systems in prolonged drug delivery. 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites provide insights into the design of future drug delivery systems, resulting in major progress in tumor therapy. Additionally, the cellular uptake or expulsion of incorporated chemotherapeutic drugs in Pluronic micelles mimics the normal cell function as a microenvironment.

2. Materials and Methods

Tween 20, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Deuterium oxide (D2O) with 99.9 atom % D, and Pluronic® polymers of F127 and L121 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received without any purification. Pluronic® polymers of F127 and L121 have an average Mn at ~12,600 g/mol and ~4400 g/mol, respectively. Both Pluronic F127 and Pluronic L121 were diluted with D2O, respectively, until 4.2 wt% and 50 wt%. 5-FU medicine was purchased from AdooQ® Bioscience and stored in DMSO as 0.2 M at 4 °C. For spectra experiments, the as-prepared samples were well mixed by an ultrasonic processor and then kept in Eppendorf tubes before usage or transfer. Every control sample had the same composition as its relative experimental sample. Briefly, the total volume of every sample was taken in 600 μL, and the binary mixing of Pluronic® polymers was proceeded by the ratio of volume.
Based on the 1H and 19F NMR characterization, because 5-FU has a fluorine atom, this feature allowed us to determine the radio frequency through chemical shift coupling and the corresponding environment. Accordingly, the chemotherapeutic drug 5-FU was used as an indicator to observe its distribution between the interface of F127, L121, and their Pluronic blending composites. All NMR experiments were performed on a JEOL ECZ400S/L1 spectrometer with an HFX probe at a resonance frequency of 399.78 MHz for 1H and 376.17 MHz for 19F. The 1D selective 19F-{1H} heteronuclear Overhauser enhancement experiments were performed using the pulse program (19F_1H_1d_selhoesy) from the JEOL library. The scan numbers were set at 64, with a relaxation delay of 3 s. Additionally, a mixing time of 2.7 s was used. The FID results were treated by the software of delta v.5.3.1.
To measure the amounts of 5-FU medicine during drug release experiments, 600 μL Pluronic blending composites with or without 5-FU was placed in triplicate in an Eppendorf tube, and 600 μL PBS (pH 7.4, containing 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v)) was pipetted onto the upper part of the Eppendorf tube. The as-prepared Eppendorf tube was stored in a 37 °C sink condition under agitation at 100 rpm for the release monitoring of 5-FU. In each time set of the measurement, the amount of drug-released 5-FU was determined at OD265 by using a calibration curve generated from known concentrations of 5-FU. Average was taken from three recorded 5-FU concentrations with respect to the time evolution. Fresh PBS was replaced each time for further analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

5-FU is a common chemotherapeutic medicine for intravenous injection or oral administration [19]. The chemical structure of 5-FU is depicted in Figure 1. Pluronic® polymers were self-assembled into Pluronic micelles with a hydrophilic PEO segment at the corona and a hydrophobic PPO segment in the core. Studies elucidated that 5-FU would be hydrophilic [20,21,22,23,24] or hydrophobic molecules [25,26,27,28]. However, for drug release, the encapsulation of the drug in micelles was highly dependent on its loading location rather than the intrinsic solubility of the drug in aqueous solution. Therefore, the important thing is how to extend the effective time of drug release from a designated polymeric area. This study used NMR technology to identify the position of the 5-FU medicine in the drug release carrier, trying to propose a mechanism simulating the microenvironment of the cell operation.
Figure 2 shows the measurement results of HOESY. Figure 2a demonstrates the HOESY spectrum of Pluronic F127 mixed with 4 mM of the 5-FU medicine. The DMSO signal at 2.7 ppm and the PEO signal at 3.7 ppm derived from the 5-FU medicine and Pluronic F127, respectively, can be clearly seen in the spectrum. This spectrum result shows that because Pluronic F127 has a longer hydrophilic PEO segment, at least three times that of the PPO segment, most of the 5-FU medicine is captured by the hydrophilic segment of Pluronic F127. Moreover, the DMSO spectrum signal is strong and obvious because the initial configuration conditions of the 5-FU medicine are dissolved in DMSO. This indicates that the 5-FU medicine was surrounded by the DMSO solvent and then eventually distributed among the hydrophilic PEO segments of Pluronic F127. In Figure 2b, the HOESY spectrum of Pluronic L121 mixed with 4 mM of the 5-FU medicine is shown. It can be clearly seen that the 5-FU medicine moved between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments of Pluronic L121. At 25 °C, the energy transferred through the fluorine atom resonance could reach the hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments of Pluronic L121, which are, respectively, displayed at 3.7 ppm and 3.5, 3.4, and 1.1 ppm, which are estimated to be evenly distributed. When the temperature reached 37 °C and 45 °C, the signal of the PEO segment at 3.7 ppm almost disappeared, and the signal of the PPO segment at 1.1 ppm was relatively enhanced, confirming that most of the 5-FU medicine was concentrated in the hydrophobic PPO segment. It is speculated that the 5-FU medicine prefers Pluronic F127 in the hydrophilic segment and Pluronic L121 in the hydrophobic segment. In order to produce a regulated drug release carrier, the combination of the two will have excellent drug release control capabilities.
The same measurement protocols of HOESY are reported in Figure 3, in order to observe the distribution of the 5-FU medicine in the F127/L121 Pluronic composites at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C. At 25 °C, although the F127/L121 Pluronic composite is already in the micelle state, the 5-FU medicine is distributed in both the hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments. When the temperature was raised to 37 °C, the hydrophilic PEO segment and the hydrophobic PPO segment signals can both be observed within the resonance energy transfer range of 6 Å of the fluorine atom. The difference is the deteriorated signal of the PEO segment at 3.7 ppm. Among them, for the measurement performed at 45 °C, the 5-FU medicine was mainly at the hydrophobic PPO segment, except for a barely observable signal from the PEO segment that was detected due to the signal around the copolymer junction point. Previous studies demonstrated that the amphiphilic nature of the Pluronic block copolymers would self-assemble into micellization in aqueous solutions above the critical micelle concentration (CMC) and the critical micelle temperature (CMT) [11,29]. Obviously, the stable micellization at a fixed concentration occurs above the CMT, and it becomes a driving force for the migration of the 5-FU medicine leaving away from the hydrophilic PEO segment in the self-assembly. Despite the fact the HOESY experiments were performed at ascending temperatures, the kinetics for the migration of the 5-FU medicine or the reversible process in short-term and long-term stability issues, which influence their shelf life, handling, and storage conditions, should be investigated in the future. The established 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites have a micelle structure that acts as a microenvironment mimicking the cell function to uptake or expel the 5-FU medicine by an external stimulus.
In Figure 4, the curves of 5-FU drug release are plotted for the 5-FU/Pluronic F127, 5-FU/Pluronic L121, and 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites. The drug release from polymeric systems can be described by a semi-empirical equation, the Korsmeyer-Peppas model, which has a power-law relationship:
M t M = K t n
where Mt and M are the absolute cumulative amounts of drug released at time t and infinite time, respectively; K is the release constant; exponent n describes the kinetic and the release mechanism [30,31,32,33,34]. The calculated n values are 0.05, 0.31, and 0.31 with respect to Pluronic F127, Pluronic L121, and F127/L121. This well represents the idea that the drug release mechanism of 5-FU followed Fick’s laws of diffusion since the value is below 0.43. In contrast, the release constant K determines the drug release rate accordingly at 0.93, 0.33, and 0.46. As expected, Pluronic F127 has a really fast drug release rate of less than one day, resulting from the 5-FU medicine loading at the hydrophilic PEO segments. The 5-FU medicine was directly released from the hydrophilic corona without any molecular resistance. Meanwhile, Pluronic L121 has a pretty slow drug release rate, and it took longer than twelve days until the 5-FU drug loading was completely released from the hydrophobic core of the micelles. Thus, a regulated drug release carrier was presented for the polymer blending of Pluronic F127 and Pluronic L121 in the volume ratio of 1:3. The curve of 5-FU drug release of the 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites steadily ascended within two weeks. This result tells us that the 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites would work effectively by slowing or stopping cancer cell growth in a designated medicine concertation after the first deployment surrounding the tumor site.
Finally, these HOESY and drug release studies suggest that Pluronic® polymers have a broad amphiphilic nature in response to biological activities. Based on the better understanding of the 5-FU medicine loading and the migration in the Pluronic micelles, it has gradually become clear that this medical treatment can be applied in the tumor microenvironment [35,36]. This unique drug delivery system is one of the most remarkable impacts in the emergent field of nanomedicine.

4. Conclusions

This NMR study demonstrates that HOESY spectroscopy can be applied for the structural characterization of 5-FU drug-loaded Pluronic® polymers, considering their potency as polymer-based drug delivery precision medicines. The results show that the distribution of the 5-FU medicine in the Pluronic micelles will move across the interface between the hydrophilic corona and the hydrophobic core according to the external temperature. The drug loading location of the 5-FU medicine is dominated by PEO segments at 25 °C. As the temperature increases from 25 to 45 °C, the 5-FU medicine migrates aggressively to the hydrophobic core inside the micelles. The 5-FU medicine was embedded into the PPO segment of Pluronic® polymers above 37 °C due to stable micellization. The precise 5-FU loading in the hydrophobic area gives rise to prolonged and sustained drug release in daily clinical practice. Thus, the drug loading location and drug-carrier interactions are able to be designed to deliver drugs at predetermined release rates. The drug-carrier formulation developed here would diminish the side effects and improve the life quality of patients. The methodology could also apply to another chemotherapeutic medicine, gemcitabine, as well as to the fluorine atom content.

Author Contributions

T.-F.L. supervised the conceptualization, methodology, validation, and formal analysis. S.-H.Y. was responsible for the sample preparation, investigation, and data acquisition. T.-F.L. drafted and finalized this manuscript. All authors revised this manuscript. T.-F.L. and S.-H.Y. contributed equally to this work as first authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MOST 108-2218-E-035-015-MY2 and MOST 110-2221-E-035-026 from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan, and the facility was operated under the grant of MOST110-2731-M-005-001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mei-Yueh Chien and Chun-Tan Chang for providing valuable assistance on JEOL ECZ400S/L1 and Agilent Technologies DD2 600 MHz NMR spectrometers at the Instrument Center of National Chung Hsing University. The facility was operated under the grant of MOST110-2731-M-005-001. Sincere thanks go to Edward Chen from JEOL Ltd. Taiwan office for instrumental consultation. The authors are very grateful to Ruey-Hwang Chou at China Medical University for providing Pluronic copolymers. The authors also thank Yi-Jui Liu at Feng Chia University for valuable discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Longley, D.B.; Harkin, D.P.; Johnston, P.G. 5-Fluorouracil: Mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Christensen, S.; Van der Roest, B.; Besselink, N.; Janssen, R.; Boymans, S.; Martens, J.W.M.; Yaspo, M.L.; Priestley, P.; Kuijk, E.; Cuppen, E.; et al. 5-Fluorouracil treatment induces characteristic T>G mutations in human cancer. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tian, J.; Zhang, D.; Kurbatov, V.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Fang, D.; Wu, L.; Bosenberg, M.; Muzumdar, M.D.; Khan, S.; et al. 5-Fluorouracil efficacy requires anti-tumor immunity triggered by cancer-cell-intrinsic STING. EMBO J. 2021, 40, e106065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Entezar-Almahdi, E.; Mohammadi-Samani, S.; Tayebi, L.; Farjadian, F. Recent advances in designing 5-fluorouracil delivery systems: A stepping stone in the safe treatment of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 5445–5458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Batrakova, E.V.; Kabanov, A. Pluronic block copolymers: Evolution of drug delivery concept from inert nanocarriers to biological response modifiers. J. Control. Release 2008, 130, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Jung, Y.W.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.Y.; Koo, E.J.; Oh, K.S.; Yuk, S.H. Pluronic-based core/shell nanoparticles for drug delivery and diagnosis. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 3488–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bodratti, A.M.; Alexandridis, P. Formulation of poloxamers for drug delivery. J. Funct. Biomater. 2018, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yu, J.; Qiu, H.; Yin, S.; Wang, H.; Li, Y. Polymeric drug delivery system based on pluronics for cancer treatment. Molecules 2021, 26, 3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Khaliq, N.U.; Park, D.Y.; Yun, B.M.; Yang, D.H.; Jung, Y.W.; Seo, J.H.; Hwang, C.S.; Yuk, S.H. Pluronics: Intelligent building units for targeted cancer therapy and molecular imaging. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 556, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jarak, I.; Varela, C.L.; da Silva, E.T.; Roleira, F.; Veiga, F.; Figueiras, A. Pluronic-based nanovehicles: Recent advances in anticancer therapeutic applications. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 206, 112526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kabanov, A.V.; Batrakova, E.V.; Alakhov, V.Y. Pluronic((R)) block copolymers for overcoming drug resistance in cancer. Adv. drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 759–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alakhova, D.Y.; Kabanov, A.V. Pluronics and MDR reversal: An update. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11, 2566–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tiwari, S.; Kansara, V.; Bahadur, P. Targeting anticancer drugs with pluronic aggregates: Recent updates. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 586, 119544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gong, C.Y.; Shi, S.; Dong, P.W.; Zheng, X.L.; Fu, S.Z.; Guo, G.; Yang, J.L.; Wei, Y.Q.; Qian, Z.Y. In Vitro drug release behavior from a novel thermosensitive composite hydrogel based on pluronic F127 and poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymer. BMC Biotechnol. 2009, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jung, Y.S.; Koo, D.-H.; Yang, J.-Y.; Lee, H.-Y.; Park, J.H. Peri-tumor administration of 5-fluorouracil sol-gel using a hollow microneedle for treatment of gastric cancer. Drug Deliv. 2018, 25, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kuroki, H.; Aida, E.; Komine, T.; Matsuoka, K. Solubilization of fullerene in polyoxyethylene tetradecyl ether type nonionic surfactants. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 335, 116236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lone, M.S.; Chat, O.A.; Vashishtha, M.; Dar, A.A. Transition from competitive to non-competitive solubilization with the decrease in number of oxyethylene (OE) units of non-ionic surfactants towards polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 92, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pepić, I.; Lovrić, J.; Hafner, A.; Filipović-Grčić, J. Powder form and stability of Pluronic mixed micelle dispersions for drug delivery applications. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2013, 40, 944–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miura, K.; Kinouchi, M.; Ishida, K.; Fujibuchi, W.; Naitoh, T.; Ogawa, H.; Ando, T.; Yazaki, N.; Watanabe, K.; Haneda, S.; et al. 5-FU metabolism in cancer and orally-administrable 5-FU drugs. Cancers 2010, 2, 1717–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, R.; Wu, Z.; Yang, S.; Guo, S.; Dai, X.; Qiao, Y.; Shi, X. A molecular interpretation on the different penetration enhancement effect of borneol and menthol towards 5-fluorouracil. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Poursharifi, N.; Semnani, D.; Soltani, P.; Amanpour, S. Designing a novel and versatile multi-layered nanofibrous structure loaded with MTX and 5-FU for the targeted delivery of anticancer drugs. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 179, 109275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leelakanok, N.; Geary, S.; Salem, A. Fabrication and use of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)-based formulations designed for modified release of 5-fluorouracil. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 107, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, X.; Sun, Y.; Chen, D.; Li, J.; Dong, X.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Dai, J.; et al. Mastocarcinoma therapy synergistically promoted by lysosome dependent apoptosis specifically evoked by 5-Fu@nanogel system with passive targeting and pH activatable dual function. J. Control. Release 2017, 254, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khallaf, R.A.; Salem, H.F.; Abdelbary, A. 5-Fluorouracil shell-enriched solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for effective skin carcinoma treatment. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 3452–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kong, L.; Zhang, F.; Xing, P.; Chu, X.; Hao, A. A binary solvent gel as drug delivery carrier. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 522, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tokarczyk, K.; Jachimska, B. Characterization of G4 PAMAM dendrimer complexes with 5-fluorouracil and their interactions with bovine serum albumin. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 561, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nguyen, T.T.C.; Nguyen, C.K.; Tran, N.Q. Highly lipophilic pluronics-conjugated polyamidoamine dendrimer nanocarriers as potential delivery system for hydrophobic drugs. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hu, J.; Zeng, F.; Wei, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y. Novel controlled drug delivery system for multiple drugs based on electrospun nanofibers containing nanomicelles. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2013, 25, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Batrakova, E.; Lee, S.; Li, S.; Venne, A.; Alakhov, V.; Kabanov, A. Fundamental relationships between the composition of pluronic block copolymers and their hypersensitization effect in MDR cancer cells. Pharm. Res. 1999, 16, 1373–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ozlu, B.; Kabay, G.; Bocek, I.; Yilmaz, M.; Piskin, A.K.; Shim, B.S.; Mutlu, M. Controlled release of doxorubicin from polyethylene glycol functionalized melanin nanoparticles for breast cancer therapy: Part I. Production and drug release performance of the melanin nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 570, 118613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peppas, N.A.; Sahlin, J.J. A simple equation for the description of solute release. III. Coupling of diffusion and relaxation. Int. J. Pharm. 1989, 57, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mircioiu, C.; Voicu, V.; Anuta, V.; Tudose, A.; Celia, C.; Paolino, D.; Fresta, M.; Sandulovici, R.; Mircioiu, I. Mathematical modeling of release kinetics from supramolecular drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yang, Z.; Nie, S.; Hsiao, W.W.; Pam, W. Thermoreversible Pluronic® F127-based hydrogel containing liposomes for the controlled delivery of paclitaxel: In vitro drug release, cell cytotoxicity, and uptake studies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xiong, X.; Tam, K.; Gan, L. Effect of enzymatic degradation on the release kinetics of model drug from Pluronic F127/poly(lactic acid) nano-particles. J. Control. Release 2005, 108, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yin, Y.; Yao, S.; Hu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, M.; Bian, Z.; Zhang, J.; Qin, Y.; Qi, X.; Zhou, L.; et al. The Immune-microenvironment confers chemoresistance of colorectal cancer through macrophage-derived IL6. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 7375–7387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wojtkowiak, J.W.; Verduzco, D.; Schramm, K.J.; Gillies, R.J. Drug resistance and cellular adaptation to tumor acidic pH microenvironment. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 2032–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the chemical structure of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). 5-FU medicine was loaded in the hydrophobic core of Pluronic micelles.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the chemical structure of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). 5-FU medicine was loaded in the hydrophobic core of Pluronic micelles.
Polymers 13 02705 g001
Figure 2. (a) HOESY of 5-FU embedded in F127 at 25 °C. (b) HOESY of 5-FU embedded in L121 at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C.
Figure 2. (a) HOESY of 5-FU embedded in F127 at 25 °C. (b) HOESY of 5-FU embedded in L121 at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C.
Polymers 13 02705 g002
Figure 3. (Left): HOESY of the Pluronic blending composites with volume ratio of F127/L121 = 1/3 at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C. (Right): Schematic illusion of the molecular chain model in the spectra of HOESY.
Figure 3. (Left): HOESY of the Pluronic blending composites with volume ratio of F127/L121 = 1/3 at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C. (Right): Schematic illusion of the molecular chain model in the spectra of HOESY.
Polymers 13 02705 g003
Figure 4. Curves of 5-FU drug release were plotted for F127, L121, and 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites at 37 °C.
Figure 4. Curves of 5-FU drug release were plotted for F127, L121, and 5-FU/F127/L121 Pluronic blending composites at 37 °C.
Polymers 13 02705 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, T.-F.; Yeh, S.-H. Thermosensitive Interfacial Migration of 5-FU in the Microenvironment of Pluronic Block Copolymers. Polymers 2021, 13, 2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162705

AMA Style

Lin T-F, Yeh S-H. Thermosensitive Interfacial Migration of 5-FU in the Microenvironment of Pluronic Block Copolymers. Polymers. 2021; 13(16):2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162705

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Tz-Feng, and Shih-Hsuan Yeh. 2021. "Thermosensitive Interfacial Migration of 5-FU in the Microenvironment of Pluronic Block Copolymers" Polymers 13, no. 16: 2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162705

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop