Next Article in Journal
Chemopreventive Activity of Ellagitannins from Acer pseudosieboldianum (Pax) Komarov Leaves on Prostate Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Methoxyflavones from Black Ginger (Kaempferia parviflora Wall. ex Baker) and their Inhibitory Effect on Melanogenesis in B16F10 Mouse Melanoma Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Choose Wisely: Great Variation among Genotypes of Promising Paludiculture Crop Phragmites australis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant and DNA-Protective Capacity, and Microscopic Characters of Ailanthus altissima Aerial Substances
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemical Investigation of Myrcianthes cisplatensis: Structural Characterization of New p-Coumaroyl Alkylphloroglucinols and Antimicrobial Evaluation against Staphylococcus aureus

1
Department of Environmental Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies-DiSTABiF, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4108, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(5), 1046; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051046
Submission received: 23 January 2023 / Revised: 17 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Bioactive Substances in Plant Extracts II)

Abstract

:
Species of Myrtaceae Juss., the ninth largest family of flowering plants, are a valuable source of bioactive specialized metabolites. A leading position belongs to phloroglucinol derivatives, thanks to their unusual structural features and biological and pharmacological properties. Myrcianthes cisplatensis (Cambess.) O. Berg, a common tree on the banks of rivers and streams of Uruguay, southern Brazil, and northern Argentina, with aromatic leaves, is known as a diuretic, febrifuge, tonic, and good remedy for lung and bronchial diseases. Despite knowledge about traditional use, few data on its phytochemical properties have been reported in the literature. The methanol extract of M. cisplatensis, grown in Arizona, USA, was first partitioned between dichloromethane and water and then with ethyl acetate. The enriched fractions were evaluated using a broth microdilution assay against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and 43300 (methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)). The potential antimicrobial activity seemed to increase in the dichloromethane extract, with a MIC value of 16 µg/mL against both strains. Following a bio-guided approach, chromatographic techniques allowed for isolating three coumarin derivatives, namely endoperoxide G3, catechin, and quercitrin, and four new p-coumaroyl alkylphloroglucinol glucosides, named p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone A-D. Their structures were characterized through spectroscopic techniques: 2D-NMR experiments (HSQC, HMBC, and HSQC-TOCSY) and spectrometric analyses (HR-MS). The antimicrobial assessment of pure compounds against S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 43300 demonstrated the best activity for p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone C and D with the growth inhibition of 50% at 32 µg/mL against both strains of S. aureus.

1. Introduction

Myrcianthes cisplatensis (Cambess.) O. Berg is a native plant to northern Argentina, southern Brazil, and Uruguay, found at elevations of sea level to ca. 1000 m; it frequently grows along streams. It possibly grows in Paraguay, but no specimen records have been found. The genus Myrcianthes, a group of about 40 species, widely distributed in South America, is characterized by having an embryo with thick unfused plano-convex cotyledons and uniflorous or dichasial inflorescences [1]. Its fruits are edible berries eaten by birds and mammals and are used for the preparation of marmalades [2,3]. The genus belongs to the large family of Myrtaceae, which comprises ca. 5700 species with concentrations of diversity in South America and Australasia (WCSP) [4].
M. cisplatensis is reported to be used in traditional medicine as a stimulant, diuretic, and diaphoretic [5]. Despite its documented uses by indigenous people as food and medicine [6], M. cisplatensis is underexplored from a phytochemical point of view. Previously, essential oils have been investigated with 1,8-cineole and limonene reported as major components of the leaf oil [7,8]. Additionally, conglomerone, a phloroglucinol derivative, has been reported as a constituent of its leaves [9]. This compound exhibited antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus with a MIC of 62.5 µg/mL for the sensitive strain (6538p) and MIC of s250 µg/mL for the multiresistant strains (43300 and 700699). Recent decades, in fact, have witnessed a remarkable increase in studies reporting antimicrobial compounds against pathological microorganisms isolated from Myrtaceae species [10]. To name just a few phloroglucinols, Myrtocummulone A from Myrtus communis [10], Callistrilone A from Callistemon lanceolatus [11], Rhodomyrtone A from Rhodormyrtus tomentosa [12], eugenials C and D from Eugenia umbrellifora [13], and, recently, four new alkylphloroglucinol glucosides isolated from M. communis have been found to be active against the S. aureus MRSA strain [14]. Fortunately, panels of new alkylphloroglucinols with antimicrobial activity are being discovered, which is very interesting due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains such as MRSA [15]. Antimicrobial resistance is one of the greatest challenges for scientists since it still represents a serious global public health threat, killing at least 1.27 million people worldwide. The spread of new drug-resistant strains of bacteria has diminished previous efforts in the discovery of new antimicrobials. Thus, it is of great importance to pursue research on natural compounds, derived from plants, especially Myrtaceae, with a proven record of antimicrobial properties. Here, we investigated for the first time the antibacterial potential of the methanolic extract of M. cisplatensis leaves against two S. aureus ATCC strains (29213 and 43300). Following a bio-guided investigation, four new p-coumaroyl alkylphloroglucinol glucosides, named p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone A-D, were isolated and characterized, via 2D-NMR, for the first time. The pure compounds p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone C and D were strongly active against both S. aureus strains. This paper is the fourth report about the presence of alkylphloroglucinol glucosides in plants belonging to the Myrtaceae family.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Antibacterial Assessment of Methanolic Extract and First Purification Step

The crude extract of M. cisplatensis (MYR) was tested for its antimicrobial potential against S. aureus ATCC 29213 and S. aureus ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant strain (MRSA)) using a broth microdilution assay. The extract showed promising activity on both strains, reporting the same inhibitory effects. MYR strongly reduced the growth of both strains (about 83%) at 64 μg/mL; a good antimicrobial activity was kept until the concentration of 16 μg/mL (Figure 1). The positive control, vancomycin, strongly inhibited the growth at 2 μg/mL (88.8% ± 2.1), whereas oxacillin was not able to inhibit the growth of the MRSA. The negative control methanol did not affect the cell growth at any of the tested dilutions.
Based on these promising results, MYR was further purified through liquid–liquid separation (Figure 2) first with dichloromethane (MYR_A) and then using ethyl acetate (MYR_B). The medium-polar fraction (MYR_A) and the more-polar one (MYR_B) were characterized using different metabolite contents, confirmed by their 1H-NMR profiling. In particular, MYR_A showed prevailing overlapped signals in the aliphatic region (1.6–0.2 ppm). Initially, the presence of fatty acids (Figure 2A) made it difficult to understand what kind of compounds were present in MYR_A. On the other hand, the 1H-NMR spectrum of MYR_B was characterized by resonances typical of catechin (Figure 2B). In addition, in the aromatic region (7.5–6.0 ppm), the presence of 1 the H-NMR spectrum of two additional meta-coupled doublets at δH 6.36 and δH 6.20, as well as the overlapped signals in the region between 5.0 and 3.3 ppm suggested the presence of flavonol glycosides in MYR_B.
The two fractions were tested for their antimicrobial properties. MYR_A showed the best activity on both S. aureus strains, reducing the growth by 87% at the lowest concentration of 16 μg/mL (Figure 2C), thus leading to more promising results with respect to the parental extract MYR. By contrast, MYR_B was strongly active at 128 μg/mL, reducing the growth of both Staphylococci strains by 84% (±2) but gradually decreased in activity at lower concentrations, being lowest at 16 μg/mL with the growth inhibition of 43% (± 1) and 30% (±1) against S. aureus 29213 and MRSA, respectively (Figure 2C).

2.2. Purification of MYR_A and NMR Characterization of p-Coumaroyl Alkylphloroglucinols

A metabolic complexity of MYR_A required purification in order to perform the complete structural characterization of this medium-polar fraction. The HPLC, RP-18 led to the isolation of four p-coumaroyl alkylphloroglucinols (1–4, Figure 3), isolated for the first time in addition to endoperoxide G3 (5) and three coumarin derivatives (6–8).
Compound 1, named p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone A, was described for the first time. It showed a molecular formula C29H38O11 in accordance with the pseudo-molecular [M + K]+ and [M + Na]+ peaks in the ESI Q-TOF HRMS at m/z 610.21 and m/z 585.23, respectively, and with the 13C-NMR data. In fact, this spectrum showed 29 carbons identified, on the basis of an HSQC experiment (Table 1), as 6 methyls, 1 methylene, 13 methines, and 9 quaternary carbons, including 2 ketones (δC 211.2 and 216.7) and 1 ester (δC 169.1). The 1H-NMR spectrum (Table 1) was dominated by the signals of the p-coumaroyl moiety suggested by the presence of an AA’BB’ system, as two aromatic doublets at δH 6.81 (H-2″/H-6″, δC 116.9) and δH 7.46 (H-3″/H-5″, δC 131.0), as well as two olefinic doublets at δH 7.63 (H-7″δC 146.8) and δH 6.35 (H-8″δC 114.6). The ion at m/z 147.04, present in the ESI Q-TOF MS/MS spectrum, confirmed the presence of this moiety. The coupling constant value of 15.9 Hz for olefinic protons was in good agreement with an E configuration for the double bond of p-coumaroyl moiety.
An olefinic proton at δH 5.10 (δC 118.7), an oxymethine proton at δH 3.95 (δC 89.1), and four singlets in the upfield region of the 1H-NMR spectrum, at δH 1.23 (δC 25.3), 1.31 (δC 26.1), 1.31(δC 28.7), and 1.26 (δC 27.2), were also evident. Two singlets at δH 1.77 (δC 20.1) and 1.68 (δC 27.3) suggested the presence of two methyls bonded to sp2 carbon. Finally, the presence of a doublet at δH 4.60 (δC 106.4) together with other overlapped signals in the 3.00–4.60 ppm region were in good agreement with the presence of a sugar moiety.
The sequence of the glycosidic moiety was established based on the two-bond hetero-correlations evident in the H2BC spectra and also supported by the HSQC (Figure 4A) data, suggesting the presence of a glucose moiety. The β configuration of C-1′ carbon was determined on the basis of the coupling constant value (J = 8.1 Hz) of the anomeric proton. The downfield-shifted values of methylene carbon (C-6′), as well as of the H-6′ doublet of the doublets of glucose (δH 4.51/4.37 and δC 64.2) and the correlations of these latter with carboxyl carbon at δC 169.1, highlighted in the HMBC experiment (Figure 4B), allowed the localization of p-coumaroyl moiety at the C-6′ carbon of the sugar.
In the HMBC experiment (Figure 4B), the anomeric proton at δH 4.60 showed hetero-correlations with C-10 (δC 89.1) methine carbon, whose proton at δH 3.95 showed hetero-correlations with both ketone carbons C-6 (δC 211.2) and C-8 (δC 216.7), as well as with C-7 and C-9 quaternary carbons (δC 48.7 and δC 57.3, respectively) and with C-5 quaternary carbinol (δC 83.4), confirming the presence of two hydroxyls on the cyclohexadione skeleton [16], while the hetero-correlation with C-4 methine at δC 118.7 allowed us to localize the isobutylene moiety at the C-5 of cyclohexadione (Figure 3).
The cis configuration of vicinal hydroxyl groups was determined based on the observed NOE, in the NOESY experiment, among the H-4 vinyl proton and both the H-10 proton and H-14 (Figure S1). Moreover, the NOE between the H-10 proton and H-14 methyl allowed us to deduce a β orientation for C-10. All these spectroscopic data confirmed the hypothesized structure for p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone A (1). Compound 2 was identified as p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone B, namely a Z-isomer at the double bond of p-coumaroyl moiety of compound 1. It showed a molecular formula C29H38O11, in good agreement with the quasi-molecular ion [M-Na]+ at m/z 585.23 and the fragment of p-coumaroyl moiety ion at m/z 147.04. The NMR spectra of compounds 2 and 1 showed the same 1H spin system and 13C multiplicities but showed significant differences for the olefinic protons of the p-coumaroyl moiety. In fact, the upfield-shifted values of protons H-8″ at δH 5.78 (δC 116.4) and H-7″ δH 6.88 (δC 145.7) were evident in the 1H-NMR spectrum. Furthermore, the coupling constant value (J = 12.3 Hz) for olefinic protons H-8″ and H-7″ was in accordance with a cis- geometry for a double bond. These latter protons showed hetero-correlations with carboxyl carbon C-9″ a δC 168.2, which were, in turn, hetero-correlated with methylene protons H-6′ (δH 4.49/4.32) of the glucose unit. The hetero-correlation between the anomeric proton H-1′ and carbon C-10 (δH 3.91) suggested the presence of a dihydroxy cyclohexadione skeleton, whose C-10 was linked to a glucose-6″ p-coumaroyl unit (Table 1, Figure 5B).
The cis configuration of vicinal dihydroxyl was determined based on the observation of the NOE between the oxymethine proton H-10 and vinylic proton H-4, as well as between the latter and methyl protons H-12 and H-14. Finally, the NOE was also evident between the oxymethine proton H-10 and the anomeric proton (Figure 5A).
Compound 3, named p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone C, was described for the first time. It showed a molecular formula of C29H40O11, as suggested by quasi-molecular ion [M-Na]+ at m/z 587.23. The NMR data revealed significant differences related to an isobutylene unit. In fact, the 1H-NMR experiment, along with typical resonances of p-coumaroyl moiety (Table 2), was characterized by the presence of a doublet of the doublets of a methylene proton at δH 1.61 (δC 25.7), a multiplet of a methine proton at δH 1.90 (δC 45.3), and two doublets of two methyl groups at δH 0.88 (δC 25.5) and δH 0.93 (δC 25.6).
The cross-peaks observed in the COSY experiment indicated the correlations between H-1 and H-2 methyl protons and H-3 methine, as well as between the latter and H-4 methine protons. In the HMBC experiment (Figure S1, Table 2), the presence of isobutyl moiety was confirmed by the hetero-correlations shown between the methine proton at δH 1.61 (H-3) and carbons at δC 25.5 (C-1), 25.6 (C-2), 45.3 (C-4), and 85.9 (C-5). Moreover, the heterocorrelations between methylene protons at δH 1.90 (H-4) and carbons at δC 25.5 (C-1), 25.6 (C-2), 25.7 (C-3), 85.9 (C-5), and 212.5 (C-6) suggested the presence of an alkylation site at the C-5 carbon of the cyclohexadione skeleton. The latter was highlighted by typical hetero-correlations among methyl protons at δH 1.17 (H-11), 1.22 (H-12), 1.36 (H-13), and 1.23 (H-14), and ketone carbons at δC 212.5 (C-6), 214.5 (C-8), and with quaternary carbons at δC 50.4 (C-7) and δC 51.2 (C-9). Finally, in the same experiment, the correlation between the anomeric proton at δH 4.48 (H-1′) and carbon at δC 87.3(C-10) allowed for the localization of 6′-O-p-coumaroyl glucose moiety at C-10. These spectra were in good accordance with the hypothesized structure for p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone C (3).
Compound 4 showed similar 1H spin systems and 13C multiplicities (Table 2) to those of compound 3. In particular, the coupling constant value for the olefinic proton at δH 5.78 (J = 12.8) defined compound 4 as a cis isomer of compound 3. All these spectroscopic data (Table 2) confirmed the hypothesized structure for p-coumaroylmyrciacommulone D (4), described for the first time in the present paper.
The NMR data of compound 5 (Figure 3) were in good agreement with those reported in the literature for endoperoxide G3 [17]. Finally, compounds 6–8 were identified as 5,7-dihydroxy-4-methylcoumarin (6), 5,7-dihydroxy-4,6-dimethylcoumarin (7), and 5,7-dihydroxy-4,8-dimethylcoumarin (8) [18].

2.3. The 2D-NMR Characterization of MYR_B

A 2D-NMR investigation was helpful in the characterization of the flavonoid compound of the more polar fraction MYR_B. In particular, NMR data allowed us to confirm the presence of catechin (9) [19]. Remaining to define were the second main flavonoidic compound. The 2D-NMR data suggested the presence of quercetin moiety as aglycon linked to rhamnose unit thanks to the long-range heterocorrelations (Figure S3) between the anomeric proton at δH 5.36 (H-1″) and a quaternary carbon compound at δC 134.0 (C-3). All these data allowed for the characterization of this compound as a 3-O-rhamnosyl quercetin (10).
Pure 9 and 10, obtained via MYR_B, were tested for their antimicrobial activity against S. aureus 25923 and MRSA.

2.4. Antimicrobial Assessment of Pure Compounds

Pure compounds 1–4, 6, and 9–10 were investigated for their antimicrobial properties against S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 43300 (Figure 6).
Catechin (9), quercitrin (10), and 5,7-dihydroxy-4-methylcoumarin (6) were inactive (data not shown). By contrast, p-coumaroyl alkylphloroglucinol (2–4) inhibited growth in the concentration range of 32 µg/mL to 128 µg/mL (Figure 6). In particular, the best antimicrobial activity was shown by compounds 3 and 4, evaluated in the mixture, with the growth inhibition of 50% at 32 µg/mL against both S. aureus strains. The antimicrobial activity of compound 2 was also of great interest, reducing growth at 128 µg/mL (53% ± 4 and 55% ± 4) and 64 µg/mL (55% ± 4, and 51% ± 4) against ATCC 29213 and MRSA, respectively. By contrast, compound 1 reported weak activity only on S. aureus ATCC 29213 at 32 µg/mL. This result might reflect the chemical structures of the tested compounds. It was interesting to notice that the E/Z isomers 1 and 2 affected S. aureus growth differently. In fact, the best activity was reported by compound 2, which presented a cis- configuration at the double bond of p-coumaroyl moiety. The literature data confirm these results. In fact, a double-bond geometry influences the antimicrobial properties of different etherolenic acid isomers against phytopathogenic bacteria with the Z isomer more active than the E isomer [20]. In addition, fatty acids with cis double bonds have more pronounced antibacterial properties than fatty acids with trans double bonds [21,22]. So, the potential of compound 2 might depend on this geometric isomerism. Furthermore, the antimicrobial results of compounds 2, 3, and 4 were in good agreement with the antibacterial activity reported for the related galloylated alkylphloroglucinol glucosides [14,16], whose moderate effect was reached in the concentration range of 64 µg/mL to 256 µg/mL.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Leaves of M. cisplatensis were collected at the flowering stage (May 2022) in Arizona, USA (Maricopa Country, Tempe, 9308 S. Margo Dr, 370 m 1200 ft) and identified by prof. Leslie Landrum. A voucher specimen (L.R. Landrum 11697) was deposited at the ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium. Seeds of the voucher plant were collected near Colonia, Uruguay. M. cisplatensis is not protected by local or international regulations; therefore, no specific permission was required for its collection. The leaves were dried in a ventilated stove at 40 °C to constant weight, powdered with liquid nitrogen, and stored at −20 °C until the next analysis.

3.2. General Chromatographic Procedures

Analytical TLC was performed on Merck Kieselgel 60 F254 or RP-8 F254 plates of 0.2 mm layer thickness. The plate was visualized using UV light or by spraying with H2SO4/AcOH/H2O (1:20:4), followed by heating at 120 °C for about 1 min. The plates were then heated for 5 min at 120 °C. Preparative TLC was performed on Merck Kieselgel 60 F254 plates, of 0.5 or 1 mm film thickness. Column chromatography (CC) was performed on: Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma, Merck Kieselgel 60 (70–240 µm), Merck Kieselgel 60 (40–63 µm), and Baker (Deventer, Netherlands) RP-18. The preparative HPLC apparatus consisted of Knauer Smartline 31/40 module equipped with a Knauer Smartline 1000 pump, UV detector, and PC Crom-Gate software (Knauer, Berlin, Germany). Preparative HPLC was performed using Kromasil RP-18 (10 lm, 250 10.0 mm i.d., Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA).

3.3. NMR Experiments

NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on 300.03 MHz for 1H and 75.45 MHz for 13C on a Bruker AVANCE II 300 MHz NMR Spectrometer Fourier transform in CD3OD or CDCl3 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Chemical shifts are reported in δ (ppm) and referenced to the residual solvent signal; J (coupling constant) is reported in Hz.1H-NMR spectra were acquired over a spectral window from 14 to −2 ppm, with 1.0 s relaxation delay, 1.70 s acquisition time (AQ), and 90° pulse width = 13.8 µs. The initial matrix was zero-filled to 64 K. The 13CNMR spectra were recorded in the 1H broadband decoupling mode, over a spectral window from 235 to −15 ppm, 1.5 s relaxation delay, 90° pulse width = 9.50 µs, and AQ = 0.9 s. The number of scans for both 1H and 13C-NMR experiments was chosen, depending on the concentration of the samples. With regard to the homonuclear and heteronuclear 2D-NMR experiments, the data points, number of scans, and increments were adjusted according to the sample concentrations. Correlation spectroscopy (COSY) spectra were recorded with a gradient-enhanced sequence at spectral widths of 3000 Hz in both f2 and f1 domains; the relaxation delays were 1.0 s. Nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) experiments were performed in the phase-sensitive mode. The mixing time was 500 ms, and the spectral width was 3000 Hz. For all the homonuclear experiments, an initial matrix of 512 × 512 data points was zero-filled to give a final matrix of 1 k × 1 k points. Proton-detected heteronuclear correlations were also measured. Heteronuclear single-quantum coherence (HSQC) experiments (optimized for 1J(H,C) = 140 Hz) were performed in the phase-sensitive mode with field gradient. The spectral width was 12,000 Hz in f1 (13C) and 3000 Hz in f2 (1H) and had a 1.0 s relaxation delay; a matrix of 1 k × 1 k data points was zero-filled to give a final matrix of 2 k × 2 k points. Heteronuclear 2-bond correlation (H2BC) spectra were obtained with T = 30.0 ms and a relaxation delay of 1.0 s; a third-order low-pass filter was set for 130 < 1J(C,H) < 165 Hz. A heteronuclear multiple-bond coherence (HMBC) experiment (optimized for 1J(H,C) = 8 Hz) was performed in the absolute value mode with field gradient; typically, 1H–13C gHMBC were acquired with a spectral width of 18,000 Hz in f1 (13C) and 3000 Hz in f2 (1H) and 1.0 s of relaxation delay; the matrix of 1 k × 1 k data points was zero-filled to give a final matrix of 4 k × 4 k points. Heteronuclear single-quantum coherence–total correlation spectroscopy (HSQC-TOCSY) experiments were optimized for nJ(H, C) = 8 Hz, with a mixing time of 90 ms.

3.4. High-Resolution MS and MS/MS Analysis

For accurate mass measurements, the purified compounds were analyzed using a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) SYNAPT G2Si High-Definition Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK), equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) lock-spray source and a low-flow probe [23]. All the analyses were carried out in a positive-continuum ion mode with the spray voltage set at 3 kV, by using a sampling cone voltage of 40 V and a source offset of 80 V. The source temperature was kept at 120 °C, and nitrogen was used as drying gas (flow rate of 300 L/h).
MS and MS/MS spectra (m/z range 50–1500) were acquired in the resolution mode (20,000 resolution full width at half maximum at m/z 400) with a fixed acquisition time of 60 s. Argon gas was used for collision-induced dissociation (CID). The time-of-flight analyzer of the mass spectrometer was externally calibrated with Glu-fibrinopeptide (100 fmol/μL in CH3CN:H2O 50:50 (v/v) + 1% formic acid) from m/z 50–1600.
Accurate mass data were collected by directly infusing the samples (1.5 pmol/μL in CH3OH) into the system at a flow rate of 5 μL/min. The acquisition and processing of the data were performed with the MassLynx 4.1 software (Waters, Manchester, UK). Compound (1): HRMS (ESI) calcd for C29H38O11K [M + K]+: 601.7, found 601.21, calcd for C29H38O11Na [M + Na]+: 585.6 found 585.23. Compound (2): HRMS (ESI) calcd for C29H38O11Na [M + Na]+: 585.6 found 585.23. Compound (3): HRMS (ESI) calcd for C29H40O11Na [M + Na]+: 587.62 found 587.25.

3.5. Compound Purification

Dried leaf material (100 g) was powdered and extracted via ultrasound-assisted extraction (Branson 3800 MH) for 40 min each and in methanol (2 cycles × 3.0 L). After centrifugation at 4800× g rpm (Beckman, GS-15R) for 10 min at 4 °C, the solution was dried in vacuum, giving 12.4 g of the crude extract. The methanolic crude extract was dissolved in H2O and extracted with dichloromethane in a separatory funnel. The water phase was successively extracted with ethyl acetate. The dichloromethane fraction MYR_A (2.4 g) was chromatographed on Sephadex LH-20, eluting with hexane/CHCl3/CH3OH (1:1:1), furnishing two fractions: MYR_A1 and MYR_A2. The fraction MYR_A1 was chromatographed via RP-18 HPLC eluted with H2O/CH3OH/CH3CN (5:2:3), giving the pure compounds 1 (6.0 mg), 2 (3.9 mg), and a mixture of 3 and 4 (3.1 mg). The fraction MYR_A2 was chromatographed on RP-18 CC, eluted with H2O/CH3OH/CH3CN solutions at decreasing polarity, which furnished pure compounds 5 (4.5 mg), 6 (1.0. mg), 7 (5.9 mg), and 8 (2.2 mg). An aliquot (30 mg) of MYR_B was chromatographed on TLC preparative (0.50 mm) with CH3OH/CHCl3 (1:4) as the eluent, furnishing compounds 9 (6.0 mg) and 10 (4.1 mg).

3.6. Antimicrobial Test

3.6.1. Microorganism and Growth Conditions

S. aureus ATCC 29213 and S. aureus ATCC 43300 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). All the strains were cultured in tryptic soya broth (TSB, OXOID) under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h on an orbital shaker at 200 rpm. Each tested compound was dissolved in methanol (1 mg/200 μL) to give a stock solution and diluted in Mueller–Hinton (MH).

3.6.2. Susceptibility Assay on Bacteria Planktonic Cells

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the tested compounds were determined in a specific medium using the broth microdilution assay, according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST version 7.1, 7 June 2017), as previously reported [14]. Briefly, 100 μL of bacterial culture was diluted in MH broth at a final cell concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL and added to each well of a 96-well plate containing 100 μL of MH with serially two-fold diluted compounds ranging from 128 to 16 µg/mL. Each MIC value indicates the lowest concentration of the compound that causes a total inhibition of bacterial growth after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. Negative control wells were set to contain bacteria in the Mueller–Hinton broth plus the amount of vehicle (methanol) used to dilute each compound. The positive controls included vancomycin (2 µg/mL) and oxacillin (2 µg/mL).

3.6.3. Statistical Analysis

All the results of antimicrobial activity are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (S.D.). The results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc comparison tests to verify the differences between compounds and concentrations (p < 0.05).

4. Conclusions

The bio-guided phytochemical method is still the basic commonly accepted procedure for characterizing new natural products that are pharmacologically active. Following this approach, natural compounds with potent antimicrobial activity were isolated from the plants belonging to the Myrtaceae family. In particular, alkylphloroglucinols are responsible for the documented antimicrobial properties of the family. In this context, here, we reported the results of a phytochemical investigation of the methanol leaf extract of M. cisplatensis growing in Arizona. This led, for the first time, to the isolation and characterization of four p-coumaroylmyrciacommulones A-D. Unlike the wide distribution of alkylphloroglucinol in plants belonging to the Myrtaceae family, alkylphloroglucinol glucosides are reported as constituents of only few Myrtaceae plants. From both phytochemical and biological points of view, these results are of great interest since they pave the way for future studies. In particular, with docking molecular analysis, we plan to pursue an investigation of more active alkylphloroglucinols in order to provide some information about their interaction mechanism.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12051046/s1, Figure S1: NOESY experiment of compound 1; Figure S2: HMBC experiment of compound 3. Figure S3: 2D-NMR elucidation of MYR_A: HSQC (panel A) and HMBC (panel B) experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.D., E.B., and A.F.; methodology, F.G., R.R., F.L., B.D., and E.B.; investigation, F.G., R.R.; and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.D., F.G., and L.L.; writing—review and editing, F.G., A.F., B.D., and F.L.; supervision, B.D., E.B., and A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Landrum, L.R.; Kawasaki, M.L. The genera of Myrtaceae in Brazil: An illustrated synoptic treatment and identification keys. Brittonia 1997, 49, 508–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Parra-O, C.; Bohórquez-Osorio, A.F. Effectiveness of DNA barcoding markers in the description of a new and unusual calyptrate species of Myrcianthes (Myrtaceae). Phytotaxa 2016, 284, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Loayza, A.P.; Luna, C.A.; Calvino-Cancela, M. Predators and dispersers: Context-dependent outcomes of the interactions between rodents and a megafaunal fruit plant. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thornhill, A.H.; Ho, S.Y.; Külheim, C.; Crisp, M.D. Interpreting the modern distribution of Myrtaceae using a dated molecular phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. 2015, 93, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rotman, A.D. Las especies argentinas del género Myrcianthes (Myrtaceae). Darwiniana 1979, 22, 109–123. [Google Scholar]
  6. Montenegro, P. Materia Médica Misionera. Herbolario Guaraní Siglo XVII; Buena Vista Editores: Córdoba, Spain, 2009; 436p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lorenzo, D.; Eduardo Dellacassa, E.; Ivana Bonaccorsi, I.; Mondello, L. Uruguayan essential oils. Composition of leaf oil of Myrcianthes cisplatensis (Camb.) Berg. (‘Guayabo colorado’) (Myrtaceae). Flavour Fragr. J. 2001, 16, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zygadlo, J.A.; Rotman, A.D.; Perez Alonso, M.J.; Negueruela, A.V. Leaf Oils of Two Myrcianthes Species from Argentina: M. pungens (Berg.) Legrand and M. cisplatensis (Camb.) Berg. J. Essent. 1997, 9, 237–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. D’Amico, E.; Barneche, S.; Cerdeiras, M.P.; Vázquez, A. Identification of a Bioactive Compound from Myrcianthes cisplatensis. Pharmacogn. J. 2011, 3, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Celaj, O.; Duràn, A.G.; Cennamo, P.; Scognamiglio, M.; Fiorentino, A.; Esposito, A.; D’Abrosca, B. Phloroglucinols from Myrtaceae: Attractive targets for structural characterization, biological properties and synthetic procedures. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 20, 259–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cao, J.Q.; Huang, X.J.; Li, Y.T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Jiang, R.W.; Ye, W.C. Callistrilones A and B, triketone–phloroglucinol–monoterpene hybrids with a new skeleton from Callistemon rigidus. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leejae, S.; Taylor, P.W.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P. Antibacterial mechanisms of rhodomyrtone against important hospital-acquired antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Faqueti, L.G.; Farias, I.V.; Sabedot, E.C.; Delle Monache, F.; San Feliciano, A.; Schuquel, I.T.; Cechinel-Filho, V.; Cruz, A.B.; Meyre-Silva, C. Macrocarpallike compounds from Eugenia umbelliflora fruits and their antibacterial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8151–8155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guzzo, F.; Durán, A.G.; Sanna, C.; Marasco, R.; Molfetta, N.; Buommino, E.; Fiorentino, A.; D’Abrosca, B. Gallomyrtucommulones G and H, New Phloroglucinol Glycosides, from Bioactive Fractions of Myrtus communis against Staphylococcus Species. Molecules. 2022, 27, 7109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guzzo, F.; Scognamiglio, M.; Fiorentino, A.; Buommino, E.; D’Abrosca, B. Plant derived natural products against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus: Antibiofilm activity and molecular mechanism. Molecules 2020, 25, 5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Appendino, G.; Maxia, L.; Bettoni, P.; Locatelli, M.; Valdivia, C.; Ballero, M.; Stayry, M.; Gibbons, S.; Sterner, O. Antibacterial galloylated alkylphloroglucinol glucosides from Myrtle (Myrtus communis). J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Najjar, F.; Gorrichon, L.; Baltas, M.; Andrè-Barres, C.; Vial, H. Alkylation of natural endoperoxide G3-factor. Synthesis and antimalarial activity studies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1612–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garazd, M.M.; Muzychka, O.V.; Vovk, A.I. Modified coumarins. 27. Synthesis and antioxidant activity of 3-substitued 5,7-dihydroxy-4-methylcoumarins. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2007, 43, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. D’Abrosca, B.; Lavorgna, M.; Scognamiglio, M.; Russo, C.; Graziani, V.; Piscitelli, C.; Fiorentino, A.; Isidori, M. 2D-NMR investigation and in vitro evaluation of antioxidant, antigenotoxic and estrogenic/antiestrogenic activities of strawberry grape. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 105, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Toporkova, Y.Y.; Bessolitsyna, E.K.; Smirnova, E.O.; Gorina, S.S.; Petrova, O.E.; Mukhtarova, L.S.; Grechkin, A.N. Antimicrobial activity of geometric isomers of Etherolenic acid—The products of Plants Lipoxygenase Cascade. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2018, 480, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Donkor, I.O.; Clark, A.M. In vitro antimicrobial activity of aromatic diamidines and diimidazolines related to pentamidine. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Griffin, S.G.; Wyllie, S.G.; Markham, J.L.; Leach, D.N. The role of structure and molecular properties of terpenoids in determining their antimicrobial activity. Flavour Fragr. J. 1999, 14, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Russo, R.; Rega, C.; Caporale, A.; Tonon, G.; Scaramuzza, S.; Selis, F.; Ruvo, M.; Chambery, A. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry quantification of trastuzumab in human serum by selective monitoring of a specific peptide marker from the antibody complementarity-determining regions. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 31, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Antimicrobial assay of methanolic extract of M. cisplatensis against S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 43300 strains. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons: different letters indicate significant differences among groups for each strains (a p < 0.01 and b p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Antimicrobial assay of methanolic extract of M. cisplatensis against S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 43300 strains. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons: different letters indicate significant differences among groups for each strains (a p < 0.01 and b p < 0.05).
Plants 12 01046 g001
Figure 2. Liquid–liquid separation of methanolic extract and 1H-NMR profiling of organic fractions (A,B). Antimicrobial screening of MYR_A and MYR_B (C).
Figure 2. Liquid–liquid separation of methanolic extract and 1H-NMR profiling of organic fractions (A,B). Antimicrobial screening of MYR_A and MYR_B (C).
Plants 12 01046 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure of compounds 1–10, isolated from leaves of M. cisplatensis.
Figure 3. Chemical structure of compounds 1–10, isolated from leaves of M. cisplatensis.
Plants 12 01046 g003
Figure 4. HSQC (A) and HMBC (B) experiments of compound 1.
Figure 4. HSQC (A) and HMBC (B) experiments of compound 1.
Plants 12 01046 g004
Figure 5. Selected NOESY correlation (A) and H-C long-range correlations (B) of compound 2 evidenced in HMBC. Blue, red, green and black arrows are referred to correlelations of isobutylene, cyclohexadione, p-coumaroyl and glucose moiety, respectively.
Figure 5. Selected NOESY correlation (A) and H-C long-range correlations (B) of compound 2 evidenced in HMBC. Blue, red, green and black arrows are referred to correlelations of isobutylene, cyclohexadione, p-coumaroyl and glucose moiety, respectively.
Plants 12 01046 g005
Figure 6. Antimicrobial screening of pure compounds isolated from bioactive fractions of M. cisplathensis. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons. a p < 0.01 and b p< 0.05 indicate significant results for compounds 2 and 3_4 at 128, 64, and 32 μg/mL compared with 16 μg/mL; ** p < 0.01 indicates significant results among compounds at certain concentrations.
Figure 6. Antimicrobial screening of pure compounds isolated from bioactive fractions of M. cisplathensis. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons. a p < 0.01 and b p< 0.05 indicate significant results for compounds 2 and 3_4 at 128, 64, and 32 μg/mL compared with 16 μg/mL; ** p < 0.01 indicates significant results among compounds at certain concentrations.
Plants 12 01046 g006
Table 1. NMR data of compounds 1–2 in CD3OD 1.
Table 1. NMR data of compounds 1–2 in CD3OD 1.
p-Coumaroylmyrciacommulone A (1)p-Coumaroylmyrciacommulone B (2)
Positionδc (Type)δH
(J in Hz)
HMBC (H→C) NOESYδc (Type)δH
(J in Hz)
HMBC (H→C) NOESY
127.3 (CH3)1.68 s3,4 27.6 (CH3)1.70 s2,3,4
220.1 (CH3)1.77 s3,4 20.2 (CH3)1.78 s1,3,4
3145.9 (C)-- 145.5 (C)--
4118.7 (CH)5.10 s1,2,51,12,10118.6 (CH)5.10 s1,2,51,10,12,14
583.4 (C)-- 81.6 (C)--
6211.2 (C)-- 214.8 (C)--
748.7 (C)-- 48.9 (C)--
8216.7 (C)-- 209.6 (C)--
957.3 (C)-- 56.8 (C)--
1089.1 (CH)3.95 s4,5,6,7,8, 13,1′2,4,12,1′89.7 (CH)3.91 s4,5,6,7,8, 11,1′2,4,12,1′
1127.2 (CH3)1.26 s5,8,7,10,12 27.7 (CH3)1.20 s7,8,10,12
1228.7 (CH3)1.31 s6,7,10,11 28.6 (CH3)1.28 s6,7,10,11
1326.1 (CH3)1.31 s8,9,10,14 26.8 (CH3)1.31 s6,8,9,14
1425.3 (CH3)1.23 s6,8,9,10,13 26.1 (CH3)1.23 s6,8,9,11
1′106.4 (CH)4.60 d (8.1)5,1010106.8 (CH)4.55 d (7.8)5,1010
2′75.2 (CH)3.19 dd (8.4, 8.1) 75.9 (CH)3.18 dd (7.8, 9.0)
3′78.3 (CH)3.37 ov 78.2 (CH)3.37 ov
4′71.8 (CH)3.30 ov 72.0 (CH)3.25 ov
5′75.5 (CH)3.54 ov 75.4 (CH)3.49 ov
6′64.2 (CH2)4.51 dd (3.0, 12.3); 4.37 dd (6.9, 12.3)9″ 64.3 (CH2)4.49 dd (2.1, 12.0); 4.32 dd (7.2, 12.0)9″
1″127.0 (C)- 127.3 (C)-
2″116.9 (CH)6.81 d (8.4)1″,4″3″,5″116.1 (CH)6.76 d (8.7)1″,4″3″,5″
3″131.0 (CH)7.46 d (8.4)2″,4″, 6″,7″,9″2″,6″,8″134.1 (CH)7.67 d (8.7)2″,4″,6″, 7″,9″2″,6″,7″
4″162.6 (C)- 160.5 (C)-
5″131.0 (CH)7.46 d (8.4)2″, 4″, 6″,7″,9″2″,6″,8″134.1 (CH)7.67 d (8.7)2″,4″,6″, 7″,9″2″,6″,7″
6″116.9 (CH)6.81 d (8.4)1″,4″3″,5″116.1 (CH)6.76 d (8.7)1″,4″3″,5″
7″146.8 (CH)7.63 d (15.9)1″,3″,8″,9″3″,5″,8″145.7 (CH)6.88 d (12.3)8″,9″3″,5″,8″
8″114.6 (CH)6.35 d (15.9)1″,9″3″,5″116.4 (CH)5.78 d (12.3)1″,7″,9″7″
9″169.1 (C)- 168.2 (C)-
1 d = doublet, dd = doublet of doublets; m = multiplet; ov = overlapped; s = singlet; t = triplet; J values (Hz) are reported in brackets.
Table 2. NMR data of compounds 3 and 4 in CD3OD 1.
Table 2. NMR data of compounds 3 and 4 in CD3OD 1.
p-Coumaroylmyrciacommulone C (3)p-Coumaroylmyrciacommulone D (4)
Positionδc (Type)δH (J in Hz)HMBC (H→C) δc (Type)δH (J in Hz)HMBC (H→C)
125.5 (CH3)0.88 d (6.6)1,425.5 (CH3)0.88 d (6.6)1,4
225.6 (CH3)0.93 d (6.6)2,425.6 (CH3)0.93 d (6.6)2,4
325.7 (CH)1.61 m2,4,525.7 (CH)1.61 m2,4,5
445.3 (CH2)1.90 dd (2.1, 6.1)3,5,645.3 (CH2)1.90 dd (2.1, 6.1)3,5,6
585.9 (C)--85.9 (C)--
6212.5 (C)--212.5 (C)--
750.4 (C)--50.4 (C)--
8214.5 (C)--214.5 (C)--
951.2 (C)--51.2 (C)--
1087.3 (CH)3.93 s6,8,9,13,14,1′86.9 (CH)3.87 s6,8,9,13,14,1′
1126.6 (CH3)1.17 s6,7,8,1226.6 (CH3)1.17 s6,7,8,12
1227.4 (CH3)1.22 s7,10,1127.4 (CH3)1.22 s7,10,11
1323.2 (CH3)1.36 s8,9,10,1123.2 (CH3)1.36 s8,9,10,11
1425.2 (CH3)1.23 s7,8,10,1325.2 (CH3)1.23 s7,8,10,13
1′106.2 (CH)4.48 d (7.3)10106.2 (CH)4.48 d (7.3)10
2′76.6 (CH)3.21 t 76.6 (CH)3.21 t
3′78.2 (CH)3.37 ov 78.2 (CH)3.37 ov
4′72.6 (CH)3.30 ov 72.6 (CH)3.30 ov
5′75.6 (CH)3.54 ov 75.6 (CH)3.54 ov
6′65.3 (CH2)4.56 dd (2.2, 12.0); 4.35 dd (7.0, 12.0)9″65.3 (CH2)4.56 dd (2.2, 12.0); 4.35 dd (7.0, 12.0)
1″130.8 (C)- 127.1 ( C )-
2″118.0 (CH)6.80 d (8.4)3″,4″116.8 (CH)6.76 d (8.4)1″,4″
3″132.0 (CH)7.44 d (8.4)1″,2″,4″,7″134.4 (CH)7.67 d (8.4)1″,4″,7″,9″
4″160.8 (C)- 160.3 (C)-
5″132.0 (CH)7.44 d (8.4)1″,2″,4″,7″134.4 (CH)7.67 d (8.4)1″,4″,7″, 9″
6″118.0 (CH)6.80 d (8.4)3″,4″116.8 (CH)6.76 d (8.4)1″,4″
7″147.6 (CH)7.63 d (16.1)1″,8″,9″145.8 (CH)6.87 d (12.6)3″,5″
8″115.7 (CH)6.32 d (16.1)1″,7″,9″116.5 (CH)5.77 d (12.6)1″,9″
9″168.9 (C)- 168.9 (C)-
1 d = doublet, dd = doublet of doublets; m = multiplet; ov = overlapped; s = singlet; t = triplet J values (Hz) are reported in brackets.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guzzo, F.; Buommino, E.; Landrum, L.; Russo, R.; Lembo, F.; Fiorentino, A.; D’Abrosca, B. Phytochemical Investigation of Myrcianthes cisplatensis: Structural Characterization of New p-Coumaroyl Alkylphloroglucinols and Antimicrobial Evaluation against Staphylococcus aureus. Plants 2023, 12, 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051046

AMA Style

Guzzo F, Buommino E, Landrum L, Russo R, Lembo F, Fiorentino A, D’Abrosca B. Phytochemical Investigation of Myrcianthes cisplatensis: Structural Characterization of New p-Coumaroyl Alkylphloroglucinols and Antimicrobial Evaluation against Staphylococcus aureus. Plants. 2023; 12(5):1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guzzo, Francesca, Elisabetta Buommino, Leslie Landrum, Rosita Russo, Francesca Lembo, Antonio Fiorentino, and Brigida D’Abrosca. 2023. "Phytochemical Investigation of Myrcianthes cisplatensis: Structural Characterization of New p-Coumaroyl Alkylphloroglucinols and Antimicrobial Evaluation against Staphylococcus aureus" Plants 12, no. 5: 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop