Next Article in Journal
Insights into Polyphenol–Lipid Interactions: Chemical Methods, Molecular Aspects and Their Effects on Membrane Structures
Previous Article in Journal
New Aspects of In Situ Measurements for Downy Mildew Forecasting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression of GEX1 Orthologs of Brassica rapa and Oryza sativa Rescued the Nuclear Fusion Defect of the Arabidopsis GEX1 Mutant

1
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
2
Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(14), 1808; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141808
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 July 2022 / Published: 8 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Cell Biology)

Abstract

:
Nuclear fusion is required for the sexual reproduction of various organisms, including angiosperms. During the life cycle of angiosperms, nuclear fusion occurs three times: once during female gametogenesis, when the two polar nuclei fuse in the central cell, and twice during double fertilization. Nuclear fusion in plant reproduction is achieved by sequential nuclear fusion events: outer and inner nuclear membrane fusion. Arabidopsis gamete expressed 1 (GEX1) is a nuclear membrane protein of gametes that is required for nuclear fusion during reproduction. Although orthologs of GEX1 have been identified in various land plants, sequence identities are not high, even between angiosperm GEX1 orthologs; the sequence identity between Arabidopsis GEX1 and Oryza sativa GEX1 ortholog is lower than 50%. Here, we found that the expression of GEX1 orthologs of O. sativa, as well as of Brassica rapa from the Arabidopsis GEX1 promoter, rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1 mutant. We also found that the expression of these GEX1 orthologs rescued the lethality of the gex1 homozygous mutant, which is proposed to be caused by the sperm nuclear fusion defects upon fertilization. Our results indicate a functional conservation between Arabidopsis and O. sativa GEX1 orthologs, despite their relatively low sequence identities.

1. Introduction

The fertilization of angiosperms consists of multiple processes, starting with the adhesion of pollen grains on the stigma of a pistil. Pollen germinates and grows a tube in the pistil to deliver sperm cells to the female gametophytes in the ovary. After arrival at the female gametophyte, two sperm cells are released from the pollen tube to fertilize two female gametes, the egg and central cell. Fertilization of the egg and central cell results in the formation of the embryo and the endosperm, respectively [1]. Plants have mechanisms that enable the progression of these fertilization processes with high fidelity.
Nuclear fusion is required for the sexual reproduction of various organisms, including angiosperms. During the life cycle of angiosperms, nuclear fusion occurs three times. Two of these events are sperm nuclear fusion during double fertilization. The third nuclear fusion occurs during the development of female gametophytes [2,3]. In most angiosperms, including Arabidopsis thaliana, a single megaspore produced by meiosis undergoes three rounds of mitosis. After the second mitosis, a four-nucleate female gametophyte is produced. Cellularization starts after the third mitosis, resulting in the formation of a seven-celled female gametophyte, which consists of one egg cell, one central cell, two synergid cells, and three antipodal cells. The central cell contains two polar nuclei that fuse before pollination to form the secondary nucleus in Arabidopsis and other species [2,3].
In contrast to mammalian fertilization, in which nuclear fusion takes place during the first mitotic division by nuclear envelope breakdown and reconstitution, nuclear fusion in plant reproduction is achieved by sequential nuclear membrane fusion events: outer and inner nuclear membrane fusion [4]. Our analyses showed that, in Arabidopsis thaliana, the immunoglobulin-binding protein (BiP), a molecular chaperone of the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) family in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), is required for the fusion of polar nuclei [5]. BiP functions in the fusion of outer and inner nuclear membranes of polar nuclei with its regulatory partners, ER-resident J-domain-containing proteins [6]. BiP and ER-resident J-proteins are also involved in sperm nuclear fusion after fertilization. Analyses of the development of the mutant seeds showed that fertilization-coupled sperm nuclear fusion is critical for proper endosperm proliferation [7].
We also showed that Arabidopsis gamete-expressed 1 (AtGEX1) is a nuclear membrane protein necessary for nuclear fusion during Arabidopsis reproduction [8]. The AtGEX1 gene was identified by screening genes that are expressed in the sperm cells [9]. The gex1-1 mutant was isolated from a collection of mutants constructed by the insertion of a T-DNA that expresses β-glucuronidase (GUS) from the pollen-specific LAT52-promoter [10,11,12]. Analyses of the gex1-1 mutant show that AtGEX1 is involved in polar nuclear membrane fusion after fusion of the outer nuclear membrane. AtGEX1 is also involved in sperm nuclear fusion in the fertilized egg and central cells. The resulting gex1-1 homozygous mutant seeds showed aberrant endosperm proliferation and defects in early embryo development, which resulted in seed abortion [8,13].
Orthologs of AtGEX1 have been identified in various land plants [8]. GEX1 family proteins are part of Kar5/GEX1/Brambleberry family, which includes budding yeast Kar5 and zebrafish Brambleberry proteins [14]. Yeast Kar5 protein is a nuclear membrane protein that is essential for nuclear fusion during yeast mating [15]. Zebrafish Brambleberry is essential for pronucleus fusion in the zygote and for karyomere fusion during early embryogenesis [16]. All land plant GEX1 orthologs contain the Cys-rich domain (CRD) in their N-terminus [14], followed by two or three putative coiled-coil regions and three transmembrane domains (Figure 1A). However, sequence similarities are not high, even between angiosperm GEX1 orthologs [8]. Similar amino acid sequence divergence between angiosperm orthologs was reported in the case of HAPLESS2 (HAP2)/GENERATIVE CELL-SPECIFIC1 (GCS1) protein. The Oryza sativa (rice) ortholog of HAP2/GCS1 is 59% identical to Arabidopsis HAP2/GCS1 in the N-terminal region (residue 1-559 of A. thaliana HAP2/GCS1) and 37% identical at the C-terminus (residue 582-705 of A. thaliana HAP2/GCS1). However, the expression of the O. sativa ortholog of HAP2/GCS1 failed to rescue the Arabidopsis hap2-1 fertilization defect [17]. Analysis using interspecific HAP2/GCS1 chimeras showed that amino acid sequence divergence in the N-terminal extracellular domain caused the functional differences between HAP2/GCS1 orthologs of distantly related species.
Here, we asked whether differences in amino acid sequences between angiosperm GEX1 orthologs cause their functional differences in nuclear fusion. We found that the expression of GEX1 orthologs of Brassica rapa, which belongs to the same family as A. thaliana, (BrGEX1) and O. sativa (OsGEX1) from the AtGEX1 promoter, rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes. We also found that the expression of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 rescued the lethality of the gex1-1 homozygous plants, including the seed abortion phenotype, which was suggested to be caused by the sperm nuclear fusion defect at fertilization. These results indicate conserved nuclear fusion activities between Arabidopsis and rice GEX1 orthologs, despite their relatively low sequence identities.

2. Results

2.1. Expression of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 Rescued the Polar Nuclear Fusion Defect of the gex1-1 Female Gametophytes

Multiple sequence alignments obtained using Clustal Omega [18] showed that the amino acid identities between AtGEX1 and GEX1 orthologs of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 are 73.8% and 43.8%, respectively (Supplementary Figure S1). Although the CRD is a region with relatively high amino acid residue conservation, the amino acid identity between AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 was 50.0% (Figure 1A). To analyze the functional differences between angiosperm GEX1 orthologs in nuclear fusion, we examined whether the expression of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 rescued the nuclear fusion defect of the Arabidopsis gex1-1 mutant. We first analyzed whether the expression of GEX1 orthologs of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes. An analysis of mature-stage female gametophytes by confocal laser-scanning microscopy showed that approximately 50% of female gametophytes of gex1-1/+ plants contained unfused polar nuclei (Figure 1B–D). As reported previously, the expression of AtGEX1 from the AtGEX1-promoter rescued the polar nuclear fusion defects of the gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes [8]. More than 90% of the ovules of the gex1-1/+ line homozygous for the construct containing AtGEX1 cDNA, driven by the AtGEX1 promoter (pAtGEX1: AtGEX1), contained a single secondary nucleus. We introduced constructs containing BrGEX1 cDNA or OsGEX1 cDNA driven by the AtGEX1 promoter (pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1) into the gex1-1/+ plants. Three independent transgenic gex1-1/+ lines that were homozygous for pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 and two independent transgenic gex1-1/+ lines homozygous for pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 were isolated. More than 90% of the ovules contained a single secondary nucleus in all transgenic lines (Figure 1D). These results indicate that the expression of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes.

2.2. Expression of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 Rescued the Lethality of the gex1-1 Homozygous Mutant

By genotyping the progenies of the transgenic gex1-1/+ lines homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1, pAtGEX1: BrGEX1, or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1, we obtained plants that were homozygous for the gex1-1 mutation. Real-time quantitative PCR analyses showed that the expression of the AtGEX1 transcripts was not detectable in flowers of the gex1-1 homozygous plants that were homozygous for the pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 transgenes (Figure 2A). The BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 transcripts were expressed from the introduced transgenes in the isolated transgenic lines, although their expression levels differed among the lines (Figure 2B,C). These results indicate that the expression of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter rescued the lethality of the gex1-1/gex1-1 homozygous plants. Since the T-DNA element used for the generation of the gex1-1 mutant contained a LAT52: GUS pollen-specific reporter gene, pollen carrying the gex1-1 allele can be identified using assays for GUS activity. The gex1-1 mutant is homozygous for the quartet1 (qrt1) mutation, which generates four microspores derived from a single pollen mother cell. These remain attached to each other [19]. While pollen tetrads of the gex1-1/+ contained two GUS-positive and two GUS-negative pollen grains, the obtained gex1-1 homozygous plants produced pollen tetrads containing four GUS-positive pollen grains (Figure 2D–K), confirming that the plants were homozygous for gex1-1.

2.3. Expression of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 Rescued Abortion of the gex1-1 Homozygous Mutant Seeds

AtGEX1 is also required for sperm nuclear fusion after fertilization. Sperm nuclear fusion events were defective in the fertilized egg and central cell after the fertilization of gex1-1 female gametophytes by gex1-1 pollen. The resulting gex1-1 homozygous mutant seeds were lethal and showed defects in early embryo development [8]. In contrast, wild-type plants produced siliques with a full seed set (Figure 3A), self-crossed gex1-1/+ produced siliques containing approximately 23% aborted seeds, which is statistically consistent with 25% seed abortion (Figure 3B arrowheads and Figure 3F). The expression of AtGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter rescued the seed abortion of the homozygous gex1-1 mutant. Homozygous gex1-1 lines that were homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1 were obtained from three independent pAtGEX1: AtGEX1 gex1-1/+ transgenic lines [8]. These lines produced siliques with full seed sets, comparable to those observed in wild-type plants (Figure 3C,F). The expression of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter also rescued the abortion of the gex1-1 homozygous mutant seeds. The gex1-1 homozygous plants that were homozygous for the pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 transgenes also produced siliques with full seed sets (Figure 3D–F). Since sperm nuclear fusion defects at fertilization were suggested to cause the seed abortion [7,8], these results suggest that the expression of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 rescued the sperm nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 homozygous mutant seeds.

2.4. Structural Similarities between GEX1 Orthologs

The amino acid sequence of OsGEX1 was 43.8% identical to that of AtGEX1. AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 are predicted to contain two and three putative coiled-coil regions, respectively. Despite these differences in their primary structure, the above results show that OsGEX1 has similar nuclear fusion activities to AtGEX1. This is probably due to the relatively high amino acid sequence similarities between AtGEX1 and OsGEX1: their amino acid similarity is higher than 80% in the CRD and coiled-coil regions (Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure S1). The observed high amino acid sequence similarities could result in conservation of the tertiary structures between AtGEX1 and OsGEX1. Structural predictions by AlphaFold2 [20] showed that OsGEX1 had a similar tertiary structure to that of AtGEX1 (Figure 4). All GEX1 family proteins contain the CRD in the N-terminal region, which is characterized by the presence of six conserved Cys residues [8,14]. Structural prediction showed the CRD to be a globular domain (Figure 4). Following the CRD, the coiled-coil regions of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 were predicted to form an anti-parallel, α-helical, coiled-coil hairpin. Using this coiled-coil hairpin, the CRD is predicted to be positioned close to the transmembrane domains in both structures. AtGEX1 orthologs contain the putative N-terminal signal sequence (Figure 1A). The predicted structures of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 lacking their putative signal sequence are similar to those of the full-length proteins (not shown). The observed similarity between the predicted AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 structures can explain the nuclear fusion activities of OsGEX1 in Arabidopsis, despite the relatively low identities in their amino acid sequences.

3. Discussion

AtGEX1 is a nuclear membrane protein required for all three nuclear fusion events in Arabidopsis reproduction, polar nuclear fusion during female gametogenesis and sperm nuclear fusion during double fertilization [8]. GEX1 orthologs have been identified in various land plants. In this study, we showed that the expression of OsGEX1 as well as BrGEX1 rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 female gametophytes. We also obtained the gex1-1 homozygous plants in the transgenic gex1-1/+ lines expressing BrGEX1 and OsGEX1. Since the sperm nuclear fusion defects upon fertilization of the gex1-1 homozygous seeds are suggested to cause seed abortion [8], our results strongly suggest that the expression of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 also rescued the sperm nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 mutant. Therefore, OsGEX1 as well as BrGEX1 most likely shares conserved nuclear fusion activities with AtGEX1 in the nuclear fusion events of reproduction.
Rescue of the nuclear fusion defects in the gex1-1 mutant by the expression of OsGEX1 was probably due to the conserved tertiary structure of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1. The N-terminal region of these proteins is predicted to be consisted of two domains, the CRD and the coiled-coil domain. Since coiled-coils are found in proteins functioning in membrane fusion [21], AtGEX1 and its orthologs possibly function in the membrane fusion process in nuclear fusion. The CRD is found in all GEX1 orthologs [14]. The CRD most likely plays key roles in the nuclear fusion activities of GEX1 orthologs. In addition to the conserved Cys residues, CRD contains amino acid residues conserved between angiosperm GEX1 orthologs [8]. Mutational analysis of these conserved residues would provide insights into AtGEX1 functions in nuclear fusion.
In Arabidopsis, fusion of the polar nuclei is completed during female gametogenesis. In contrast, in B. rapa and rice, fusion starts during female gametogenesis but is not completed before fertilization [22,23]. Electron microscopy showed that, in rice mature female gametophytes, the partially fused polar nuclei were connected by bridges between the two nuclei and their nucleoplasm was continuous [22], indicating that nuclear fusion proceeded after the fusion of inner nuclear membrane. This is in good contrast to the gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes, which were defective in the nuclear membrane fusion step following the fusion of the outer nuclear membranes [8]. The completion of polar nuclear fusion in the gex1-1 female gametophytes expressing BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 supports that the variation in the times of nuclear fusion completion is not due to differences in the activities of GEX1 orthologs. Mechanisms regulating the fusion of polar nuclei after the membrane fusion process, which allow for the completion of polar nuclear fusion during female gametogenesis, may exist in Arabidopsis but not in B. rapa or rice female gametophytes. Molecular genetics would reveal the mechanisms of functioning in the final steps of polar nuclear fusion.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana qrt1-2 (CS8846; Col-3) was used as the wild type. The gex1-1 (CS817261; Col-3) mutant allele has been described [13]. Seeds of rapid-cycling Brassica rapa (Fast plants) [24] were purchased from In The Woods Group (Aomori, Japan). The seeds were surface-sterilized and sown on soil or Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Fuji Film Wako, Osaka, Japan) containing 0.7% agar and 1% sucrose. The plants were grown at 22 °C under continuous light.

4.2. Plasmid Construction and Plant Transformation

A plasmid for expression of Arabidopsis thaliana GEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter was previously described [8]. Primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Total RNA was prepared from flowers of rapid-cycling Brassica rapa plants using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) and reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the SuperScriptIII first-strand synthesis system (Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A cDNA fragment for Brassica rapa GEX1 (BrGEX1) was PCR-amplified using primer set BrGEX1F1/BrGEX1R1 and first-strand cDNA as a template. The amplified 1.8 kb DNA fragment was cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector to generate pSNA139. A cDNA fragment for Oryza sativa GEX1 (OsGEX1) was PCR-amplified using primer set OsGEX1F2/OsGEX1R2 and first-strand cDNA of Oryza sativa japonica (Nipponbare) spikelet (a gift from Daisuke Maruyama, Yokohama City University) as a template. The amplified 2.0 kb DNA fragment was cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector to generate pSNA141. The BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 constructs from pSNA139 and pSNA141, respectively, were introduced into pSNA136 [8] using LR clonase II (Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K., Tokyo, Japan).
To generate transgenic lines, Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 was introduced into Arabidopsis plants using the floral-dip method [25]. The transgenic plants were selected on MS agar plates containing 50 µg/mL hygromycin and were subsequently transferred to soil.

4.3. Microscopy

The ovules were prepared for confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) as described [26]. A Leica TCS-SP8 confocal microscope fitted with a 20× multi-immersion objective lens (PL APO CS2 20×/0.75 IMM CORR HC; Leica Microsystems) was used for CLSM. Images were captured at 495–540 nm after excitation at 488 nm with a solid-state laser.
GUS staining was performed as described previously [6], except that the incubation time for GUS staining of ovules was changed from 0.5 to 1.5 h. Images were observed and captured by light microscope BX51 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DP70 cooled CCD camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Silique images were captured and recorded using a SteREO Lumar V12 stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Images were processed for publication using Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

4.4. Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was prepared from inflorescences using the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan). First-strand DNA was synthesized from the RNA sample used for RNA-seq analysis using a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The gene-specific primers used for real-time PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Real-time PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) and THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR mix (Toyobo) with 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and extension at 60 °C for 1 min. ABI sequence detection software (version 1.4; Life Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) was used for quantification. UBQ10 was used as an internal control to normalize the RNA quantity. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.

4.5. AlphaFold Structure Prediction

The structures of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1, as predicted by AlphaFold2, were obtained from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database [27]. To predict the structures of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1, which lacked a putative signal sequence by AlphaFold2 [20], we used the ColabFold Google Colab notebook [28]. Structural alignments were performed by The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.4.1 (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11141808/s1, Figure S1: Sequence alignment of AtGEX1, BrGEX1 and OsGEX1; Table S1: PCR primers used for plasmid construction; Table S2: PCR primers used for quantitative real-time PCR.

Author Contributions

Designing the experiments, A.Y. and S.-i.N.; performing all the experiments, A.Y. and S.-i.N.; analyzing the data, A.Y. and S.-i.N.; writing the manuscript, A.Y. and S.-i.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported, partially, by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (17H05837 and 19H04857 to S.i.-N.); Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant numbers 16K07394 and 19K06704 to S.-i.N.), from the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Daisuke Maruyama for the first-strand cDNA of rice spikelet and discussion, Akiko Yoshii and Kumiko Ikarashi for their assistance in the construction of transgenic plants, and Hiroyuki Kakui, Yasunori Watanabe and Toshiya Endo for discussion. This work was the result of using research equipment shared in MEXT Project for promoting the public utilization of advanced research infrastructure (program supporting the introduction of the new sharing system) at Niigata University, Grant Number (JPMXS0421100321).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dresselhaus, T.; Sprunck, S.; Wessel, G.M. Fertilization Mechanisms in Flowering Plants. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, R125–R139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yadegari, R.; Drews, G.N. Female Gametophyte Development. Plant Cell 2004, 16, S133–S141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Drews, G.N.; Koltunow, A.M.G. The Female Gametophyte. Arabidopsis Book 2011, 9, e0155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jensen, W.A. Observations on the fusion of nuclei in plants. J. Cell Biol. 1964, 23, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Maruyama, D.; Endo, T.; Nishikawa, S. BiP-Mediated Polar Nuclei Fusion Is Essential for the Regulation of Endosperm Nuclei Proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1684–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Maruyama, D.; Yamamoto, M.; Endo, T.; Nishikawa, S. Different Sets of ER-Resident J-Proteins Regulate Distinct Polar Nuclear-Membrane Fusion Events in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1937–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Maruyama, D.; Higashiyama, T.; Endo, T.; Nishikawa, S. Fertilization-Coupled Sperm Nuclear Fusion Is Required for Normal Endosperm Nuclear Proliferation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nishikawa, S.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Suzuki, C.; Yabe, A.; Sato, Y.; Kurihara, D.; Sato, Y.; Susaki, D.; Higashiyama, T.; Maruyama, D. Arabidopsis GEX1 Is a Nuclear Membrane Protein of Gametes Required for Nuclear Fusion During Reproduction. Front Plant. Sci. 2020, 11, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Engel, M.L.; Holmes-Davis, R.; McCormick, S. Green Sperm. Identification of Male Gamete Promoters in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2124–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Twell, D.; Yamaguchi, J.; Mccormick, S. Pollen-Specific Gene Expression in Transgenic Plants: Coordinate Regulation of Two Different Tomato Gene Promoters during Microsporogenesis. Development 1990, 109, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sessions, A.; Burke, E.; Presting, G.; Aux, G.; McElver, J.A.; Patton, D.A.; Dietrich, B.; Ho, P.; Bacwaden, J.; Ko, C.; et al. A High-Throughput Arabidopsis Reverse Genetics System. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2985–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Johnson, M.A.; von Besser, K.; Zhou, Q.; Smith, E.; Aux, G.; Patton, D.; Levin, J.Z.; Preuss, D. Arabidopsis Hapless Mutations Define Essential Gametophytic Functions. Genetics 2004, 168, 971–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Alandete-Saez, M.; Ron, M.; Leiboff, S.; Mccormick, S. Arabidopsis thaliana GEX1 has dual functions in gametophyte development and early embryogenesis. Plant J. 2011, 68, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ning, J.; Otto, T.D.; Pfander, C.; Schwach, F.; Brochet, M.; Bushell, E.; Goulding, D.; Sanders, M.; Lefebvre, P.A.; Pei, J.; et al. Comparative Genomics in Chlamydomonas and Plasmodium Identifies an Ancient Nuclear Envelope Protein Family Essential for Sexual Reproduction in Protists, Fungi, Plants, and Vertebrates. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 1198–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Beh, C.T.; Brizzio, V.; Rose, M.D. KAR5 Encodes a Novel Pheromone-Inducible Protein Required for Homotypic Nuclear Fusion. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 139, 1063–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Abrams, E.W.; Zhang, H.; Marlow, F.L.; Kapp, L.; Lu, S.; Mullins, M.C. Dynamic Assembly of Brambleberry Mediates Nuclear Envelope Fusion during Early Development. Cell 2012, 150, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wong, J.L.; Leydon, A.R.; Johnson, M.A. HAP2(GCS1)-Dependent Gamete Fusion Requires a Positively Charged Carboxy-Terminal Domain. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1000882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, Scalable Generation of High-Quality Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments Using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Preuss, D.; Rhee, S.Y.; Davis, R.W. Tetrad Analysis Possible in Arabidopsis with Mutation of the QUARTET (QRT) Genes. Science 1994, 264, 1458–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jahn, R.; Lang, T.; Südhof, T.C. Membrane Fusion. Cell 2003, 112, 519–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Dong, J.; Yang, H.-Y. An Ultrastructural Study of Embryo Sac in Oryza sativa L. Acta Bot. Sin. 1989, 31, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Went, J.; Cresti, M. Pre-Fertilization Degeneration of Both Synergids in Brassica Campestris Ovules. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1988, 1, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Williams, P.H.; Hill, C.B. Rapid-Cycling Populations of Brassica. Science 1986, 232, 1385–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral Dip: A Simplified Method for Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Christensen, C.A.; King, E.J.; Jordan, J.; Drews, G.N. Megagametogenesis in Arabidopsis Wild Type and the Gf Mutant. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1997, 10, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. Available online: https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/ (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  28. Mirdita, M.; Schütze, K.; Moriwaki, Y.; Heo, L.; Ovchinnikov, S.; Steinegger, M. ColabFold—Making Protein Folding Accessible to All. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression of Brassica rapa or Oryza sativa GEX1 orthologs rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the Arabidopsis gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes. (A) Schematic representation of AtGEX1, BrGEX1, and OsGEX1. GEX1 has 1 predicted N-terminal signal sequence (SS), 1 Cys-rich domain (CRD), 2 coiled-coil domains (CC), and 3 transmembrane domains (TMs). Amino acid sequence identities and similarities of each region of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 between AtGEX1 are shown. (B,C) Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) of the ovules of the gex1-1/+ plant. Half of the ovules are morphologically normal (B), and in the other half, the polar nuclei remained unfused (C). syn, synergid nucleus; en, egg nucleus; scn, secondary nucleus; upn, unfused polar nucleus. Bars = 20 µm. (D) Suppression of the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 female gametophytes by BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 expression. The ovules were analyzed by CLSM.
Figure 1. Expression of Brassica rapa or Oryza sativa GEX1 orthologs rescued the polar nuclear fusion defect of the Arabidopsis gex1-1 mutant female gametophytes. (A) Schematic representation of AtGEX1, BrGEX1, and OsGEX1. GEX1 has 1 predicted N-terminal signal sequence (SS), 1 Cys-rich domain (CRD), 2 coiled-coil domains (CC), and 3 transmembrane domains (TMs). Amino acid sequence identities and similarities of each region of BrGEX1 and OsGEX1 between AtGEX1 are shown. (B,C) Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) of the ovules of the gex1-1/+ plant. Half of the ovules are morphologically normal (B), and in the other half, the polar nuclei remained unfused (C). syn, synergid nucleus; en, egg nucleus; scn, secondary nucleus; upn, unfused polar nucleus. Bars = 20 µm. (D) Suppression of the polar nuclear fusion defect of the gex1-1 female gametophytes by BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 expression. The ovules were analyzed by CLSM.
Plants 11 01808 g001
Figure 2. The gex1-1/gex1-1 homozygous plants expressing AtGEX1, BrGEX1, or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter. (A) AtGEX1 mRNA levels measured using qRT-PCR in flowers of wild-type (WT) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1, pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1. (B) BrGEX1 mRNA levels measured using qRT-PCR in flowers of wild-type (WT) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: BrGEX1. (C) OsGEX1 mRNA levels measured using qRT-PCR in flowers of wild-type (WT) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: OsGEX1. (DK) Images of GUS-stained pollen tetrads (DG) and anther locules (HK) from gex1-1/+ plants (D,H) or gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1 (E,I), pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 (F,J) or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 (G,K). Bars = 50 µm (DG), 100 µm (HK).
Figure 2. The gex1-1/gex1-1 homozygous plants expressing AtGEX1, BrGEX1, or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter. (A) AtGEX1 mRNA levels measured using qRT-PCR in flowers of wild-type (WT) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1, pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1. (B) BrGEX1 mRNA levels measured using qRT-PCR in flowers of wild-type (WT) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: BrGEX1. (C) OsGEX1 mRNA levels measured using qRT-PCR in flowers of wild-type (WT) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: OsGEX1. (DK) Images of GUS-stained pollen tetrads (DG) and anther locules (HK) from gex1-1/+ plants (D,H) or gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1 (E,I), pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 (F,J) or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 (G,K). Bars = 50 µm (DG), 100 µm (HK).
Plants 11 01808 g002
Figure 3. Expression of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter-rescued seed abortion of the gex1-1/gex1-1 homozygous mutant. (AE) Siliques of wild-type (A), gex1-1/+ (B) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1 (C), pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 (D) or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 (E). Arrowheads in (B) show aborted seeds. Bars = 1 cm. (F) Percentages of aborted seeds in gex1-1 mutants.
Figure 3. Expression of BrGEX1 or OsGEX1 from the AtGEX1 promoter-rescued seed abortion of the gex1-1/gex1-1 homozygous mutant. (AE) Siliques of wild-type (A), gex1-1/+ (B) and gex1-1/gex1-1 plants homozygous for pAtGEX1: AtGEX1 (C), pAtGEX1: BrGEX1 (D) or pAtGEX1: OsGEX1 (E). Arrowheads in (B) show aborted seeds. Bars = 1 cm. (F) Percentages of aborted seeds in gex1-1 mutants.
Plants 11 01808 g003
Figure 4. Model of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 structures, as determined by the AlphaFold2 protein structure and folding prediction algorithm [20]. The structures for AtGEX1 (left: Q681K7) and OsGEX1 (right: Q67UU1) are shown. Chains are colored by the predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) score (blue to red). CRD, a coiled-coil region, and transmembrane domains (TM) are shown.
Figure 4. Model of AtGEX1 and OsGEX1 structures, as determined by the AlphaFold2 protein structure and folding prediction algorithm [20]. The structures for AtGEX1 (left: Q681K7) and OsGEX1 (right: Q67UU1) are shown. Chains are colored by the predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) score (blue to red). CRD, a coiled-coil region, and transmembrane domains (TM) are shown.
Plants 11 01808 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yabe, A.; Nishikawa, S.-i. Expression of GEX1 Orthologs of Brassica rapa and Oryza sativa Rescued the Nuclear Fusion Defect of the Arabidopsis GEX1 Mutant. Plants 2022, 11, 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141808

AMA Style

Yabe A, Nishikawa S-i. Expression of GEX1 Orthologs of Brassica rapa and Oryza sativa Rescued the Nuclear Fusion Defect of the Arabidopsis GEX1 Mutant. Plants. 2022; 11(14):1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141808

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yabe, Ayaka, and Shuh-ichi Nishikawa. 2022. "Expression of GEX1 Orthologs of Brassica rapa and Oryza sativa Rescued the Nuclear Fusion Defect of the Arabidopsis GEX1 Mutant" Plants 11, no. 14: 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141808

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop