Next Article in Journal
Grazing Intensity Alters Leaf and Spike Photosynthesis, Transpiration, and Related Parameters of Three Grass Species on an Alpine Steppe in the Qilian Mountains
Next Article in Special Issue
Individual and Combined Effects of Booting and Flowering High-Temperature Stress on Rice Biomass Accumulation
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in the Plant β-Sitosterol/Stigmasterol Ratio Caused by the Plant Parasitic Nematode Meloidogyne incognita
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Thermal Stresses in Maize: Effects and Management Strategies

by
Muhammad Ahmed Waqas
1,
Xiukang Wang
2,*,
Syed Adeel Zafar
3,*,
Mehmood Ali Noor
4,
Hafiz Athar Hussain
1,
Muhammad Azher Nawaz
5 and
Muhammad Farooq
6,7
1
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
3
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
4
Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
5
Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
6
Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 123, Oman
7
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(2), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020293
Submission received: 6 January 2021 / Revised: 30 January 2021 / Accepted: 1 February 2021 / Published: 4 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plants Response to Temperature Extremes)

Abstract

:
Climate change can decrease the global maize productivity and grain quality. Maize crop requires an optimal temperature for better harvest productivity. A suboptimal temperature at any critical stage for a prolonged duration can negatively affect the growth and yield formation processes. This review discusses the negative impact of temperature extremes (high and low temperatures) on the morpho-physiological, biochemical, and nutritional traits of the maize crop. High temperature stress limits pollen viability and silks receptivity, leading to a significant reduction in seed setting and grain yield. Likewise, severe alterations in growth rate, photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation, cellular membranes, and antioxidant enzyme activities under low temperature collectively limit maize productivity. We also discussed various strategies with practical examples to cope with temperature stresses, including cultural practices, exogenous protectants, breeding climate-smart crops, and molecular genomics approaches. We reviewed that identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and genes controlling high- and low temperature stress tolerance in maize could be introgressed into otherwise elite cultivars to develop stress-tolerant cultivars. Genome editing has become a key tool for developing climate-resilient crops. Moreover, challenges to maize crop improvement such as lack of adequate resources for breeding in poor countries, poor communication among the scientists of developing and developed countries, problems in germplasm exchange, and high cost of advanced high-throughput phenotyping systems are discussed. In the end, future perspectives for maize improvement are discussed, which briefly include new breeding technologies such as transgene-free clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas)-mediated genome editing for thermo-stress tolerance in maize.

1. Introduction

Climate change is threatening food security across the globe [1]. Crop yield must increase by 25–70% by the year 2050 without putting pressure on ecosystem functioning [2,3]. Since the 1960s, the yield improvement rate of major food crops (rice, wheat, and maize) has slowed down [4], and current yield trends are not sufficient to meet future requirements [5]. Moreover, improvements in crop productivity must be attainable in a highly inconstant climate. More and intensified extreme climatic events (drought, heatwave, frost, heavy rainfall, storms, etc.) are anticipated in the future [6,7]. These unprecedented climatic extremes will negatively influence plant growth and development, ecosystem services, and human comfort [8].
Maize (Zea mays L.) crop provides 19.5% of global caloric intake from all sources [9,10]. Furthermore, it has also become an important industrial commodity. However, temperature extremes (occurrence of high and low temperatures during the growth period) are threatening the yield sustainability of maize. Maize plants are sensitive to heat stress (>30 °C) and there is a strong decline in grain yield as plants face heat stress above this threshold for a prolonged duration [11].
The optimal growth of maize crop needs different temperatures during day and night and over the whole growing season. During daylight, the optimal temperature varies from 25 to 33 °C, whereas during the night, optimal temperature varies from 17 to 23 °C; the mean optimal temperature for the whole growing season is 20–22 °C [12]. Maize plants germinate best at 25–28 °C [13]. The reproductive stage is the most sensitive to sub-optimal and supra-optimal temperatures. A swing from the optimal temperature causing high-temperature stress significantly decreases the growth rate and grain yield through a decrease in seed setting ratio and disturbance of several physiological processes (Figure 1). The minimum and maximum threshold temperatures at various growth and developmental stages of maize crop are presented in Table 1. It is projected that until 2050, 45% of the global maize production area is likely to face a mean episode of five days of the maximum temperature >35 °C during the reproductive stage annually [14]. This is important to note as a mere 1 °C rise in mean seasonal temperature can cut the economic yield of maize crop by 3–13% [15]. A high temperature at critical development stages may also deteriorate the quality of maize grains [16].
Although maize crop is originally from the (sub-)tropics, its cultivation has moved to regions with temperate climates. Productivity loss under low temperature mainly occurs because of a strong decline in metabolite transport and photosynthetic activity [17] (Figure 2). In general, low temperature negatively affects gaseous exchange, water use efficiency, morphology, and physiology [10,18]. Farmers sow maize early to escape heat stress at the reproductive stage, but plants are exposed to low soil temperature (below 10 °C) during early seedling establishment. During this phase, soil temperature strongly impacts leaf development as the shoot apex is positioned very near to the soil surface. Therefore, to cope with temperature extremes in maize production, a comprehensive set of adjustments in cultural as well as in molecular techniques (such as breeding climate-resilient genotypes) and an improved understanding of the genetic, physiological, and molecular responses to temperature extremes are needed.
The published reviews focused either on heat or cold stress or on a particular stage of the crop [19,20]. Here, we review the impacts of both heat and cold stresses on maize production and elucidate recent developments in improving its performance. Besides, future research needs have also been highlighted.

2. Maize Growth under Temperature Extremes

Crop plants usually experience different biotic and abiotic stresses simultaneously that cause many morphological and physiological perturbations, resulting in stunted plant growth and reduced grain yields [21,22]. Temperatures above the threshold for various metabolic, biochemical, and physiological processes result in imbalance for these activities and activate the innate plant defense system [23]. Temperature extremes alter the photosynthetic process, damage the biological membranes, affect nutrient uptake, and limit the functioning of various enzymes in maize plants [24]. Stunted growth and low photosynthetic rates cause impairment in overall maize performance.
Table 1. Threshold temperatures for different growth stages in maize.
Table 1. Threshold temperatures for different growth stages in maize.
Growth StagesThreshold Min. Temperature (°C)Threshold Max. Temperature (°C)Symptoms
Sowing–Emergence10 ± 2.240 ± 2.1Growth rate is severely decreased
Sowing–Tasseling9 ± 2.739 ± 0.6Abnormal tassel growth
Anthesis8 ± 0.537 ± 1.4Pollination failure may occur
Grain filling8 ± 2.036 ± 1.4Substantial decrease in starch and sucrose production
Whole maize crop6 ± 1.142 ± 3.3Low crop performance/Crop failure
Source: [25]. Data are mean ± standard errors of threshold temperatures for different growth stages in maize obtained from 70 publications using a meta-analytic approach. Threshold minimum temperature and threshold maximum temperature indicate the lower and upper thresholds at which tissue injury occurs or metabolic process may discontinue, respectively. At this temperature, maize yield loss can be sudden, huge, and irreversible.

2.1. High Temperature Impacts

Agronomic: Brief or prolonged episodes of high temperature stress during the maize growth cycle (especially at the most critical flowering stage) cause metabolic and/or morphological alterations, leading to irreversible yield reductions [25,26,27]. Maize leaf growth increases at temperatures ranging from 10 to 35 °C, while it starts declining at temperatures >35 °C [28]. Temperatures ranging from 33 to 36 °C during pre-and post-flowering regimes of maize, respectively, reduce the CO2 exchange rate (~17%), crop growth rate (17–29%), grain number (7–45%), and grain yield (10–45%) [29]. During flowering, high temperature negatively affects the floret number, silk number, and grain development [30]. Air temperature above 35 °C suppresses maize ovary fertilization and the grain filling process, which is directly associated with the final grain yield [16,31]. Heat stress decreases the time for tasseling and pollen shedding and enhances the anthesis-silking interval to reduce the viability and amount of pollens [31]. Moreover, heat-stressed maize plants are unable to convert photosynthates into starch in pollens. Thus, a decrease in pollen numbers, viability, and starch synthesis contribute to the distorting fertilization process [32]. Heat stress in tropical maize causes leaf firing, tassel blast and sterility, and senescence, leading to productivity loss [33].
Heat stress during the reproductive phase causes parchedness of silks, pollens’ sterility, and poor seed setting, resulting in drastic yield reduction [25,26]. Productivity loss at the reproductive phase due to heat stress is also linked with a decrease in the number of grains and their weight [34]. The day-time temperature of 35 °C in waxy maize reduced the grain yields by up to 31% due to decreased grain number and grain weight [35]. In response to heat stress stimuli, the defense mechanism of plants tends to opt to escape or avoid the stress period through phenotypic plasticity, which reduces the grain filling duration [34,36]. Interestingly, under elevated temperatures, the normal process of endosperm development is fully completed by the maize plant, but at a much accelerated pace. Furthermore, the maize plant only executes accelerated endosperm development under elevated day- and night-time temperature, not only under day-time warming [37], suggesting that heat stress impact varies greatly with the time of day and severity of stress. Figure 3 explains the influence of thermal stress on reproductive development in maize.
Physio-metabolic: Inadequate photosynthates in heat-stressed plants are often considered as a major limiting factor for yield [38]. Nevertheless, considering the C4 biochemistry of maize crop, usually, photosynthate supply is not limiting [39]. Thus, the primary cause of yield loss under elevated temperatures for the maize crop during the grain filling period is the accelerated developmental process. Grain yield decreases when yield formation operations are conducted earlier than normal. Key enzyme activities such as ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (involved in starch biosynthesis) are also limited at numerous levels, including both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels [37]. Notably, a high temperature at the grain filling phase reduces amyloplast biogenesis and endosperm cell division, causing a decrease in the grain size [27].
Starch accumulates in the developing grain through a complex network of enzymes (sucrose synthase, soluble starch synthase) regulating this pathway [40]. Heat stress limits these enzyme activities and impairs starch accumulation during the grain filling and hardening process [41]. High temperature (>30 °C) interrupts the normal amyloplast replication process and cell division in grains, thereby shrinking sink size [42]. Besides, high temperature affects the physicochemical properties (starch, protein, and soluble sugar contents) of waxy maize during the grain filling process, resulting in grains with substandard quality [43].
Heat stress also disturbs the normal physiological processes required for optimal maize growth and development. Reduced biomass assimilation and grain abortion are the key physiological processes resulting in reduced grain number in heat-stressed plants [30,44]. Heat stress up to 36 °C significantly decreased the radiation use efficiency [45], and less active nitrogen and carbon metabolisms contribute to a decrease in dry matter accumulation [46]. The discussion above suggests that radiation use efficiency, biomass accumulation, and the source–sink ratio are the crucial determinants of final grain yield and the harvest index under heat stress conditions. Taken together, heat stress negatively impacts pollens viability and silks’ receptivity, leading to a significant decrease in seed set and economic yield (Table 2).

2.2. Low Temperature Impacts

Agronomic: Maize is a cold-sensitive plant, and often, yield is limited in cool, humid regions (e.g., Central Europe). In these regions, when maize crop is exposed to cold stress, the growth rate tends to reduce while growth duration is prolonged. Thus, low temperature weakens the seedling and may also cease the grain filling prematurely at the end of the growth cycle [36,49,50], resulting in lower and inconsistent grain production in mountainous and temperate areas. Injury to plant cells or tissue under chilling stress during the early seedling stage or low temperatures at the reproductive stage in maize may vary depending upon the stress duration and its extent.
Low temperature stress, characterized by plant exposure to a temperature range below 10 °C for a sufficient duration, can interrupt the normal process of crop growth, starting from the early seedling stage to the later reproductive stages [51]. Chen et al. (2012) reported that low temperature in maize seedlings significantly limits germination and seedlings’ growth and destabilizes the antioxidant defense mechanism [52]. Cold stress negatively affects root morphology, photosystem II (PS II) efficiency, chlorophyll contents, and leaf area [53]. A short episode of low temperature stress (for instance, below 10 °C for 7 days) during the V6–V9 maize growth stages can significantly delay the anthesis initiation [54]. Among the morphological responses by stressed maize plants, low temperature stress causes abnormal tassel growth in maize [55], thus affecting the pollination and grain filling processes. Therefore, sub-optimal temperatures can cause a serious yield reduction if occurring at critical reproductive stages, as plants assign more than 50% of their photosynthates to develop grains during this phase until physiological maturity [56]. Low temperature stress significantly decreases the plant height and total crop biomass of maize [57]. Leaf development becomes slow in cold-stressed plants due to a prolonged cell cycle and decreased rate of mitosis [58].
Physio-metabolic: A temperature around 8–10 °C delays seedling emergence and causes a reduction in the root/shoot ratio and chlorophyll content during the early growth cycle in maize [59], whereas a temperature from 4 to 10 °C may suppress chlorophyll synthesis and causes a severe reduction in photosystem II (PS II) activity [60]. Low temperature stress negatively impacts chloroplast and thylakoid structures, enzyme activities, and the Calvin cycle by reducing metabolite transport [61]. While studying cell wall properties under chilling stress (12–14 °C), Bilska-Kos et al. (2017) reported that cell wall pectin content and pectin methylesterase activity become lower in a cold-sensitive maize hybrid [62]. Various physiological and biochemical disorders can be observed in photosynthetic machinery, cell membranes, and enzyme activities under low temperature stress [63]. Chen et al. (2012) reported a significant rise in malondialdehyde (MDA) contents and cell membrane permeability due to chilling injury at the early seedling stage, with reduced contents of water, proline, and chlorophyll in maize leaves [52]. Low temperature stress also makes shoots and roots macro-nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, Mg)-deficient by limiting metabolite transport [64]. However, when maize plants are exposed to chilling temperatures of 7–10 °C, they produce signaling compounds (e.g., nitric oxide and abscisic acid) in defense [65]. Low temperature stress causes damage to macromolecules, cellular structures, and membranes due to the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [22,36,66]. In defense, plants produce more antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and proline [10,67].
Low temperature stress at grain filling can alter the starch composition in grains by reducing the amylose content, ultimately decreasing water solubility and starch swelling power and increasing gelatinization temperatures [43]. Temperatures below 15 °C during the late reproductive stage reduce the activities of the photosynthetic apparatus as well as rates of sucrose phosphate synthase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, and sucrose synthase. It tends to destabilize the assimilation process, resulting in impaired grain quality with substandard-quality components and poor physical grain texture [68]. Collectively, low temperature stress reduces the germination percentage, growth rate, and the photosynthetic rate, resulting in poor yield. A schematic representation of the various effects and mechanisms of heat and cold stresses are summarized in Figure 4.

3. Strategies to Mitigate the Effects of Temperature Fluctuations

To cope with the deleterious effects of temperature extremities, it is unavoidable to adopt multiple agronomic and breeding alternatives along with advanced genomic tools. Here, we discuss various strategies to combat temperature extremes in maize cropping systems.

3.1. Climate-Smart Agronomic Practices

Climate-smart agronomic practices for a specific cropping system include practices that help farmers adapt well to climate stresses and/or decrease productivity loss. These practices are becoming increasingly important to mitigate the adverse effects of temperature extremes [69,70]. Change in planting time may help plants escape the temperature extreme phase at critical growth stages [71]. In the North China Plain, maize crops have been confronted with episodes of chilling and heat stresses in recent years. Alteration in planting time helped reduce the yield losses significantly by minimizing the risk of heat and chilling damage during the silking and grain filling stages, respectively [34].
While switching to longer seasons, cultivars also enhanced the grain yield (ranging from 13% to 38%) by successfully mitigating the grave effects of increased warming trends of three decades [72]. In semi-arid areas (e.g., Sub-Saharan African countries), chances of maize crop failure are very high because of the harsh climate. In these areas, the technology of dry soil planting (DSP) is very effective to attain adequate grain yield [73]. Farmers sow seeds just before the rainy season in dry soil. Because seeds will be in soil at the time of rain, they can start the germination process instantly after receiving moisture. Such technologies can be strengthened with artificial intelligence more accurately predicting the rainy season [74]. Adoption of cultivars with more thermal time requirements can also significantly increase the yield by the delay in maturity and extended reproductive growth duration [75]. Therefore, farmers need to adapt to the future climate by optimizing the sowing date, maize earliness, and dry soil planting and selecting cultivars with more thermal time requirements according to their local pedoclimatic conditions.

3.2. Use of Plant Growth Regulators

Exogenous application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) such as thiourea, proline, salicylic acid, etc., can create tolerance against temperature extremes [18,76]. PGRs are modest in molecular weight and influence plant growth at very low concentrations. PGRs make plants’ defenses strong against external stress stimuli by scavenging ROS, making osmotic adjustments, stabilizing the integrity and structure of membranes and enzymes/proteins for normal functioning, inducing expression of antioxidant-related genes, and increasing the nutrient uptake as well as the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and osmolytes [76]. Exogenous application of PGRs by seed priming (SP) and seed coating (SC) can significantly contribute to offsetting the adverse effects of temperature extremes on crop production. These practices enhance seed vigor, germination, physiology, and quality and provide uniform stand establishment under low and high temperature stresses [77,78]. Seed coating is an established technology to upgrade the seed performance under stress environments. Chemicals that regulate crop growth and development including insecticides, fungicides, plant growth stimulants, and fertilizers are used as seed coatings to guard seed against unfavorable conditions. Seed priming is a pre-sowing seed treatment that enables maize seeds to germinate fast [79]. Seed priming with both synthetic and natural growth promoters enhances maize performance under heat stress [24].
Low temperature in the area surrounding maize roots is a key problem in Northern and Central Europe which inhibits root growth and development, germination, early stand establishment, and nutrient uptake. Priming seeds with micronutrients (Zn, Fe, and Mn) improved the grain yield of maize by enhancing early seedling growth, germination, and nutrient uptake when maize seedlings were exposed to low soil temperature [80]. Seed priming with SA and H2O2 alleviated the negative impact of chilling tolerance by synergistically improving germination rate, seedling growth, α-amylase activity, energy supply, and antioxidant level (SOD, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase, GR) and upregulating the expression of their correspondence genes and genes involved in the biosynthesis of gibberellic acid ( ZmGA3ox2 and ZmGA20ox1), signaling (ZmGID1 and ZmGID2) and downregulating germination inhibition genes such as ZmRGL2 [81]. Likewise, SC technology is becoming popular worldwide, and every year, the proportion of maize plantations with coated seed is increasing [82]. SC with thermo-responsive hydrogel poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-butylmethacrylate) loaded with salicylic acid improved germination energy, root and shoot growth, and defensive enzyme production in the coated maize seeds to induce chilling tolerance [83]. SC with chitosan and hydrogen peroxide enhanced the emergence rate, protein content, and endogenous levels of H2O2 of maize seedlings [84]. The most yield-limiting factor under low temperature stress is the malfunctioning of photosynthetic machinery and metabolite transport. Exogenous treatment of S-Methylmethionine-Salicylate (a sulfur-containing compound that contributes to the methylation process and methionine biosynthesis) maintained high photosynthetic activity by enhancing defense gene expression in the phenylpropanoid pathway to protect maize plants under low temperatures [85]. Additionally, melatonin is a novel plant growth regulating substance that is widely accepted as a powerful antioxidant and signaling molecule. Melatonin application has improved heat and cold tolerance in various plant species [86,87]. This novel substance can also be utilized to improve the low and high temperature stress tolerance of maize varieties.
Plant growth regulators also offset the high temperature stress in maize production. SP with synthetic chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide, ascorbic acid, and salicylic acid improved maize morphological, physiological, and grain-related aspects (grain yield and grain quality) by improving cell membranes’ integrity, chlorophyll contents, antioxidants’ activity (CAT, POD, and SOD), and leaf water contents when plants were exposed to a high temperature at the reproductive and grain filling stages [88]. Foliar applications of natural (moringa fresh leave extract, sorghum water extract) and synthetic PGRs (salicylic acid, thiourea, ascorbic acid) were found effective in improving maize grain quantity and quality under thermal stresses by improving the growth, morphology, physiology, and antioxidant defense system of plants [18,88]. Although PGRs showed promising results to address the negative impacts of temperature extremes (Table 3), some caution is still required to be taken before their application. PGRs’ impacts are dependent on crop species, variety, applied dose, and even on application time (crop growth stage). Therefore, site-specific procedures suited to a place should be adopted by farmers with the advice of scientists.

3.3. Breeding for Thermal Tolerance

Among different approaches to cope with the deleterious effects of temperature stress, breeding tolerant cultivars is the most economical and sustainable one [93,94]. Climate-resilient cultivars can help increase the maize yield by 5–25% in Africa [95]. Huge variation exists among the maize germplasm for the degree of tolerance to temperature stress, which should be exploited [33]. Direct selection of germplasm based on higher yield performance under stress conditions is complicated [96]. Alternatively, breeding followed by selection based on secondary traits having a significant correlation with yield and its contributing traits is more effective and sustainable [33]. However, this selection should be based on cost-effective technologies. The use of sensors may also help accelerate plant breeding programs [97]. The integration of phenotyping with modeling can increase the selection effectiveness for stress tolerance based on complex traits [98].
High-throughput phenotyping (phenomics) has emerged as a novel tool of modern breeding that has tremendous scope for efficient selection. However, its use among breeders, particularly in developing countries, is still a challenge due to the relatively high cost, which should be addressed by international research organizations such as the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Conventional breeding is a slow process and may take from several years to a decade to develop a new variety. Quick and shorter breeding cycles can help in developing new tolerant cultivars in less time [99]. Shuttle breeding, introduced by the CIMMYT, is another option to reduce the time required in developing a variety. This system can help to have an extra generation advanced each year at a different field location.

3.3.1. Breeding for Heat Tolerance

Identification of suitable parents is vital for any breeding program, keeping in mind the objectives of the study. For instance, the selection of high-yielding heat-tolerant varieties to be used as parents is a pre-requisite to start a breeding program aimed at the development of high-temperature-tolerant maize cultivars. Here, we enlist several maize genotypes including inbred lines and hybrids that showed significant heat tolerance and, thus, can serve as important breeding materials to introgress heat tolerance in elite maize cultivars (Table 4). Similarly, the identification of key selection indices is crucial for the selection of tolerant cultivars or wild species. Leaf firing, tassel blast, tassel sterility (TS), anthesis-silking interval (ASI), and senescence are negatively correlated, while pollen shedding duration (PSD), seed setting percentage (SSP), and chlorophyll content are positively correlated indices with grain yield in maize under heat stress [33]. Recently, it was found that high temperature affects the carbon dioxide exchange rate (CER) in maize, which negatively affects crop growth rate, grain number, and final grain yield [29]. Photosynthesis fitness is critical in deciding the performance of maize crops under heat stress conditions [8]. Sustaining a satisfactory rate of photosynthesis activity under heat stress is essential to reduce productivity loss [100,101]. Several indicators of photosynthesis fitness have been reported such as chlorophyll contents, carotenoids, and stay-green plant architecture which are positively correlated with the rate of photosynthesis [102]. Normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI), based on the characteristic reflectance features of maize canopy, is an efficient indicator of the stay-green trait [103]. Thus, employing these traits in breeding programs of heat-tolerant high-yielding maize cultivars can increase reproductive success, photosynthesis efficiency (NDVI), and other yield-related traits under heat stress.
Wild relatives and distant parents in intra-specific crosses are very useful resources to introgress novel genes for maize improvement. Teosinte, a progenitor of cultivated maize, harbors a lot of worthy genes to tolerate a combination of different stresses. Teosinte is well adapted to the high temperature environment as it shows relatively lower damage and sustains chlorophyll content under heat stress (36 to 45 °C) and depicts higher survival capacity even at 55 °C [104]. Therefore, it can serve as a potential source for maize improvement programs. However, it was poorly exploited for the identification and introgression of such genes. In the past, an effort was made to identify a heat-tolerant variety of teosinte called “Florida” and successfully introgressed heat tolerance from teosinte to cultivated corn [105]. According to another report, inter-subspecific hybrids of teosinte × maize were developed, which showed increased thermo-tolerance for several growth- and yield-related traits [104]. Thus, the exploitation of wild relatives and distant parents in intra-specific crosses could prove a very useful resource to introgress novel genes for maize improvement. Figure 5 indicates the potential mechanisms involved in yield loss avoidance by heat-tolerant maize.

3.3.2. Breeding for Cold Tolerance

The maize crop is quite sensitive to low temperatures and requires fairly high temperatures for optimum growth and production. To avoid frequent episodes of heat and drought during the reproductive phase, farmers grow this crop early [24,106]. However, early grown maize is often exposed to chilling stress, which may lead to low crop performance due to poor germination or lack of seedling survival [107]. Sweetcorn is even more sensitive to low temperatures compared with field maize. It is imperative to attain high emergence percentages and vigorous seedlings under low temperatures to adapt maize for early sowing [108]. Massive variation is present in maize germplasm for adaptation to cold tolerance, especially in exotic maize populations [109]. Maize cultivars of temperate regions (e.g., Europe) have been widely used in chilling tolerance breeding programs based on good crop performance [60]. Here, we present several cold-tolerant maize cultivars developed around the world that could be utilized in breeding programs (Table 4). Mid-parent performance is a poor indicator of hybrid selection for cold tolerance, and testcross performance should be used as a reliable indicator for quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping to develop stable markers [110]. Identification of reliable selection indices for cold tolerance is important to screen germplasm for the breeding programs [22]. Several traits such as photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, quantum efficiency, dry matter production, leaf weight and area, and water use efficiency are good selection indices to realize cold tolerance in maize [50]. Thus, the identification of cold-tolerant germplasm based on reliable selection indices can efficiently improve performance.
Table 4. Cold-/heat-tolerant maize genotypes developed using conventional breeding methods.
Table 4. Cold-/heat-tolerant maize genotypes developed using conventional breeding methods.
Inbred Line/HybridTraitStressCrop RegionReference
Parents: B76, Tx205
Inbred lines: C273A, BR1, B105C, C32B, S1W, and C2A554-4
Low leaf firing and tassel blastHeat toleranceTexas, USA[52]
Hybrids: YH-1898, KJ. Surabhi, FH-793, ND-6339, NK-64017Improved grain yieldHeat tolerancePunjab, Pakistan[111]
ZPBL 1304Heat shock proteinHeat toleranceSouth Dakota, USA[112]
Howling MobEmergence and shootrRoot dry weightCold toleranceWisconsin, USA[107]
EP80 x PuenteareasEmergenceCold toleranceSpain[113]
Hybrids: AR1262, DKC6697, DKC6804, and M2V707Leaf and root weights and root lengthCold toleranceMississippi, USA[106]
PapirikaRelative tassel lengthCold toleranceHokkaido, Japan[54]

3.4. Molecular Approaches

Genetically modified crops (GMCs) could serve as a useful resource for novel traits [114,115]. In recent decades, rapid progress in plant molecular biology has accelerated the rate of crop improvement. Several approaches including quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, transcriptomics, marker-assisted selection (MAS), map-based gene cloning, and genome editing (such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat ((CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated-9, Cas9) have been utilized for selection and improvement of plant traits in several crops.

3.4.1. Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS)

Pyramiding useful genes followed by the selection of desirable plant material has been a challenge for plant breeders. It is nearly impossible to pyramid multiple desirable genes through conventional breeding due to linkage. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) significantly improved the efficiency as well as decreased the time needed for complex trait selection such as drought, salt, cold, and heat tolerance [116]. Multiple genes control heat tolerance traits in maize crops. After the discovery of numerous molecular markers for cold and heat tolerance in maize, it is now possible to screen the tolerant germplasm at the early growth stage, saving time, labor, and space [46,117]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are commonly used molecular markers due to their abundance in the genome, easy detection analysis, and co-dominance nature [8]. Several SNPs associated with traits governing heat and cold tolerance were identified, which could be employed in MAS to accelerate the selection process and speed up overall breeding programs [35].

3.4.2. QTL Mapping for Candidate Genes

The majority of complex plant traits (for instance, tolerance to temperature extremes) are controlled by multiple genes, also called QTLs. The QTL may be a major or minor effect, depending on its influence on the concerned plant trait. Major-effect QTLs are more influential due to their substantial contribution to the expression of plant traits. Studies have reported major and minor effects of QTLs related to cold and heat tolerance in maize [118,119,120]. However, before the application of these QTLs in molecular breeding, it is imperative to confirm these QTLs in subsequent populations to validate their presence in wide germplasm [121]. Although, little has been done to explore the QTLs for heat tolerance compared with cold tolerance in maize. A recent study identified 11 QTLs including two QTLs for grain yield for heat tolerance in maize [118]. These QTLs were identified considering multiple environments and populations to increase the reliability to be used in breeding programs [118]. Six significant QTLs were identified among two large maize inbred panels for cold tolerance considering flint and dent traits [122]. QTL mapping with seedling-based F2:3 populations revealed seven QTLs for chilling tolerance in maize [123]. Four significant-effect QTLs related to cold tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus were identified on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, and 9 and suggested the involvement of key genes on chromosome 3 in the development of functional chloroplast in maize [120]. Since good germination is a vital trait in cold stress environments, it is necessary to breed high yielding cultivars for better germination ability under low temperatures. Six QTLs controlling germination rate under low temperatures were detected on chromosomes 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9, and a single QTL explained contribution rate between 3.39% and 11.29% [124]. Seedling vigor is an important trait that can provide fast and uniform germination, vigorous crop stand, and stress tolerance. Five meta-QTLs were identified for maize seed vigor and were suggested for inclusion in cold tolerance breeding programs [108]. The introgression of multiple QTLs in elite maize germplasm can pave the way to attain temperature tolerance at multiple growth stages.
QTL mapping or genome-wide association studies (GWASs) followed by candidate gene analysis is a very useful approach to identify potential genes related to target traits such as heat or cold tolerance. However, validation of these candidate genes using other approaches such as over-expression or real-time expression analysis is important before utilization in breeding programs. Here, we present a list of potential genes linked with heat and cold stress tolerance that have been identified and validated using multiple approaches or multiple populations (Table 5). These genes could serve as a useful genetic resource in breeding climate-resilient maize cultivars.

3.4.3. Transcriptomics

Availability of the complete genome sequence made it possible to explore the hidden genetic potential of maize crop. During recent decades, the advent of microarray-based transcriptome played a significant role in identifying plenty of desirable genes with comparatively less effort. Currently, the development of RNA-Seq-based whole transcriptome further fast-tracked the identification of key genes involved in complex traits such as cold and heat tolerance [130]. A recent comparative transcriptomic profiling identified 516 upregulated and 1261 downregulated genes among heat-tolerant (Xiantian 5) and heat-sensitive (Zhefengtian) maize varieties, which offers novel insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of maize under heat stress [131]. Further quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis discovered that five genes linked with secondary metabolites’ biosynthesis and photosynthesis have higher expression in Xiantian 5 compared with Zhefengtian, suggesting their role in heat tolerance in maize by improving photosynthesis and secondary metabolites’ biosynthesis. It was further explained that heat-tolerant sweet maize regulates heat stress responses by downregulating the expression of genes related to zeatin and brassinosteroid biosynthesis [131]. Microarray-based transcriptome analysis of cold-tolerant (ETH-DH7) and cold-sensitive (ETH-DL3) varieties identified the potential genes encoding cell membrane/wall proteins, playing a key role in cold tolerance possibly by protecting cell membrane/wall from the damaging effects of chilling injury [132]. Recently, RNA-Seq-based whole-transcriptome profiling reported 948 differentially expressed genes among cold-tolerant and -sensitive varieties under freezing stress of −1 °C [133]. These genes were involved in binding functions, protein kinase activity, and peptidase activity. The qRT-PCR of the 30 selected genes further validated the RNA-Seq findings and provided a new valuable resource for target breeding. These genes should be functionally characterized to be exploited in breeding for low temperature tolerance [133]. More recently, a microarray-based transcriptome profiling of four maize varieties having contrasting cold tolerances for seedling emergence identified 64 differentially expressed genes; among them, 11 were reported to be most significantly involved in seedling cold tolerance [134]. Thus, these transcriptome-based identified genes need to be functionally characterized to better understand the physiological and molecular mechanisms of cold tolerance [133].

3.4.4. Map-Based Cloning

Map-based cloning is a widely used molecular biology tool to functionally characterize target genes. This approach usually requires gene mapping using mapping populations or recombinant inbred lines followed by cloning and complementation [135]. Several genes related to heat and cold tolerance in maize have been mapped followed by cloning. For instance, the genes AOX and Zm-AN13 regulate germination at low temperatures [136]. ZmCCT and ZmCCA1 contribute to stress tolerance in maize crop [114]. Another gene, ZmLEA3, protects lactate dehydrogenase activity to provide cold tolerance [133]. Sec14-like proteins regulate crucial biological processes, e.g., stress signaling, phospholipid metabolism, and stress response [137]. Overexpression of ZmSEC14p (Sec14-like protein) of maize plants conferred cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis, suggesting that the ZmSEC14p gene can help plants to develop cold tolerance [138]. These identified and functionally characterized genes should be employed in gene introgression programs to induce cold and heat tolerance in maize cultivars.

3.4.5. Genome Editing

Among all molecular breeding approaches, genome editing is quite a new breeding tool, especially CRISPR-Cas9. It is a powerful instrument to target desired genes with high precision [139]. Being less laborious and relatively easy, CRISPR-Cas9 is becoming increasingly important to understand various molecular mechanisms and characterize gene functions [140]. Although CRISPR-Cas9 has been used mostly for the development of disease and insect resistance in plants [141,142], it is relatively less applied for abiotic stress tolerance [139]. However, recently, genome editing for drought tolerance was successfully obtained in maize by CRISPR-Cas9 [143]. Researchers developed ARGOS8 lines by replacing the native promoter of the ARGOS8 gene (a negative regulator of ethylene responses) [144] with the maize plants’ GOS2 promoter at the 5′ untranslated region [143]. Highly precise targeting of the maize native promoter by CRISPR-Cas9 increased ARGOS8 expression levels and improved grain yield under drought conditions [143]. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated heat tolerance was attained by targeting SlAGAMOUS-LIKE 6 (SIAGL6) [145]. Likewise, CRISPR-Cas9 can develop heat- and cold-tolerant maize cultivars via genome editing of target genes [139].
Notably, transgene-free genome editing was successfully practiced in several major crops, which presents a remarkable strategy for targeted crop improvement [139,142,146]. Several techniques of transgene-free genome editing were introduced in different crop species such as protoplast-based plant regeneration in Arabidopsis, rice, tobacco, etc. [146], bombarding immature embryos in maize [147], and a more efficient callus-based transformation system in wheat [148]. These discoveries offer a great opportunity for rapid crop improvement with precise genome editing in a transgene-free manner.

4. Limitations in Crop Improvement

Maize cropping systems’ sustainability is threatened globally by unexpected shocks of more frequent temperature extremes during the growth period. Although maize breeders are working to improve crop performance, breeders from poor countries do not have access to major germplasm resources such as CIMMYT and International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) like developed countries do. The lack of a comprehensive communication system and coordination among breeders for sharing germplasm and knowledge aggravates the problem. Recently, the emergence of high-throughput phenotyping and genotyping facilitated maize breeders in the identification of efficient selection indices and molecular markers, respectively, leading to effective germplasm screening for target traits. Nevertheless, high-throughput phenotyping and genotyping facilities are not widespread among maize breeders of poor countries due to restricted funds, detectable by the slow rate of crop improvement in these areas [149]. This causes a huge difference in the average yield of maize between developed and under-developed countries [150]. For example, the average maize yield in the United States is 13.2 tons/ha, which is 340% more than the average grain yield of 3 tons/ha in South Africa [151] and 0.9 tons/ha in Mozambique [152]. Another key limitation is inadequate knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of complex traits such as heat and cold tolerance. Lack of appropriate infrastructure, inadequate operational support, limited human resources, and lack of enabling policies and statutory and regulatory frameworks are the key factors that hamper the prosperous growth of molecular breeding in developing countries [153]. Furthermore, poor communication of breeders with molecular biologists slows down maize improvement programs worldwide. A serious effort is necessary to address these key challenges among maize breeders across the world to ensure sustainable maize production and food security. This could be achieved through funded training of maize breeders from developing countries at international research stations such as CIMMYT, ICARDA, etc., to develop an excellent human resource for mid-economy countries. Another key step could be to provide instruments for high-throughput phenotyping and genotyping as well as seeds of improved cultivars to these breeders, which can boost their yield potential.
Recently, a lot of transcriptome studies have been performed in maize, just like in other crop species, to identify key genes for stress tolerance. However, studies leading to the functional validation of identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are lacking in maize, which is another reason for the slow rate of maize improvement. The reason behind this is the difficulty in the selection of candidate genes for functional validation due to a large set of genes. This could be addressed by using modern statistical tools to study the association of key DEGs with target traits that will refine the search for key candidate genes, as described in these studies [154,155].

5. Conclusions

Thermal stresses at critical growth stages of maize reduce the grain yield, nutritional value, and net income of farmers. Genetic variation exists among different cultivars for cold and heat tolerance, which indicates the need for more systematic plant breeding programs to have site-specific plant resources to improve maize crop performance under limiting growing conditions. Exogenous use of synthetic and natural plant growth regulators at low concentrations also reduces productivity loss under such circumstances. New breeding techniques such as marker-assisted breeding and genome editing, particularly the transgene-free CRISPR-Cas9 system, offer great potential for the development of climate-resilient cultivars in a comparatively shorter time. Additionally, a strong infrastructure for evaluation of maize germplasm based on high-throughput phenotyping plus genotyping is required in developing countries.

Author Contributions

M.A.W. and S.A.Z. designed the study; M.A.W., S.A.Z. and M.A.N. (Mehmood Ali Noor) wrote the first draft of the manuscript; M.A.N. (Mehmood Ali Noor) created Figure 1 and Figure 2; S.A.Z., M.A.N. (Mehmood Ali Noor) and M.A.W. designed Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5; H.A.H., M.A.N. (Muhammad Azher Nawaz) and M.F. revised the manuscript; S.A.Z. and X.W. supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (51669034, 51809224), Shaanxi Innovation Talent Promotion Program—Young Science and Technology Star Project (2018KJXX-080) and Key Scientific Research Program of Education Department of Shaanxi Province (18JS117). The APC was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation (51669034).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hunter, M.C.; Smith, R.G.; Schipanski, M.E.; Atwood, L.W.; Mortensen, D.A. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 2017, 67, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, X.; Fan, J.; Xing, Y.; Xu, G.; Wang, H.; Deng, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, P.; Li, Z. Chapter three—The effects of mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil environment of crop plants. In Advances Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Volume 153, pp. 121–173. [Google Scholar]
  4. Long, S.P.; Ort, D.R. More than taking the heat: Crops and global change. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bajželj, B.; Richards, K.S.; Allwood, J.M.; Smith, P.; Dennis, J.S.; Curmi, E.; Gilligan, C.A. Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ummenhofer, C.C.; Meehl, G.A. Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: A review. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Change, I.C. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 996. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zafar, S.A.; Hameed, A.; Nawaz, M.A.; Wei, M.; Noor, M.A.; Hussain, M. Mechanisms and molecular approaches for heat tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under climate change scenario. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 726–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wattoo, F.M.; Rana, R.M.; Fiaz, S.; Zafar, S.A.; Noor, M.A.; Hassan, H.M.; Bhatti, M.H.; Rehman, S.U.; Anis, G.B.; Amir, R.M. Identification of drought tolerant maize genotypes and seedling based morpho-physiological selection indices for crop improvement. Sains Malays. 2018, 47, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hussain, H.A.; Shengnan, M.; Hussain, S.; Ashraf, U.; Zhang, Q.; Anjum, S.A.; Ali, I.; Wang, L. Individual and concurrent effects of drought and chilling stresses on morpho-physiological characteristics and oxidative metabolism of maize cultivars. bioRxiv 2019, 829309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Schauberger, B.; Archontoulis, S.; Arneth, A.; Balkovic, J.; Ciais, P.; Deryng, D.; Elliott, J.; Folberth, C.; Khabarov, N.; Müller, C. Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Neild, R.E.; Newman, J.E. Growing Season Characteristics and Requirements in the Corn Belt; Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  13. Farooq, M.; Aziz, T.; Basra, S.; Cheema, M.; Rehman, H. Chilling tolerance in hybrid maize induced by seed priming with salicylic acid. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2008, 194, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gourdji, S.M.; Sibley, A.M.; Lobell, D.B. Global crop exposure to critical high temperatures in the reproductive period: Historical trends and future projections. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 024041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Izaurralde, R.C.; Thomson, A.M.; Morgan, J.; Fay, P.; Polley, H.; Hatfield, J.L. Climate impacts on agriculture: Implications for forage and rangeland production. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Siebers, M.H.; Slattery, R.A.; Yendrek, C.R.; Locke, A.M.; Drag, D.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Ort, D.R. Simulated heat waves during maize reproductive stages alter reproductive growth but have no lasting effect when applied during vegetative stages. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 240, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Foyer, C.H.; Vanacker, H.; Gomez, L.D.; Harbinson, J. Regulation of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in maize leaves at optimal and chilling temperatures. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 40, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Waqas, M.A.; Khan, I.; Akhter, M.J.; Noor, M.A.; Ashraf, U. Exogenous application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) induces chilling tolerance in short-duration hybrid maize. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 11459–11471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tao, Z.-q.; Chen, Y.-q.; Li, C.; Zou, J.-x.; Yan, P.; Yuan, S.-f.; Wu, X.; Sui, P. The causes and impacts for heat stress in spring maize during grain filling in the North China Plain—A review. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2677–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sandhu, S.; Singh, J.; Kaur, P.; Gill, K. Heat stress in field crops: Impact and management approaches. In Advances in Crop Environment Interaction; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 181–204. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rafique, S. Differential expression of leaf proteome of tolerant and susceptible maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in response to multiple abiotic stresses. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 97, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Ashraf, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Men, S.; Wang, L. Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: Implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zafar, S.A.; Patil, S.B.; Uzair, M.; Fang, J.; Zhao, J.; Guo, T.; Yuan, S.; Uzair, M.; Luo, Q.; Shi, J.; et al. Degenerated panicle and partial sterility 1 (DPS1) encodes a cystathionine beta-synthase domain containing protein required for anther cuticle and panicle development in rice. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 356–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hussain, H.A.; Men, S.; Hussain, S.; Chen, Y.; Ali, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, K.; Li, Y.; Xu, Q.; Liao, C. Interactive effects of drought and heat stresses on morpho-physiological attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and oxidative status in maize hybrids. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sánchez, B.; Rasmussen, A.; Porter, J.R. Temperatures and the growth and development of maize and rice: A review. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lesk, C.; Rowhani, P.; Ramankutty, N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 2016, 529, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shim, D.; Lee, K.-J.; Lee, B.-W. Response of phenology-and yield-related traits of maize to elevated temperature in a temperate region. Crop J. 2017, 5, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hussain, T.; Khan, I.A.; Malik, M.A.; Ali, Z. Breeding potential for high temperature tolerance in corn (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Bot. 2006, 38, 1185. [Google Scholar]
  29. Neiff, N.; Trachsel, S.; Valentinuz, O.R.; Balbi, C.N.; Andrade, F.H. High temperatures around flowering in maize: Effects on photosynthesis and grain yield in three genotypes. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 2702–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Edreira, J.R.; Carpici, E.B.; Sammarro, D.; Otegui, M. Heat stress effects around flowering on kernel set of temperate and tropical maize hybrids. Field Crops Res. 2011, 123, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lizaso, J.; Ruiz-Ramos, M.; Rodríguez, L.; Gabaldon-Leal, C.; Oliveira, J.; Lorite, I.; Sánchez, D.; García, E.; Rodríguez, A. Impact of high temperatures in maize: Phenology and yield components. Field Crops Res. 2018, 216, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, Y.; Tao, H.; Tian, B.; Sheng, D.; Xu, C.; Zhou, H.; Huang, S.; Wang, P. Flowering dynamics, pollen, and pistil contribution to grain yield in response to high temperature during maize flowering. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 158, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alam, M.A.; Seetharam, K.; Zaidi, P.H.; Dinesh, A.; Vinayan, M.T.; Nath, U.K. Dissecting heat stress tolerance in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Res. 2017, 204, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tian, B.; Zhu, J.; Nie, Y.; Xu, C.; Meng, Q.; Wang, P. Mitigating heat and chilling stress by adjusting the sowing date of maize in the North China Plain. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2019, 205, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, H.; Huang, T.; Ding, M.; Lu, D.; Lu, W. High temperature during grain filling impacts on leaf senescence in waxy maize. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Ali, B.; Hussain, H.A.; Qadir, T.; Hussain, S. Temperature extremes: Impact on rice growth and development. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 153–171. [Google Scholar]
  37. Boehlein, S.K.; Liu, P.; Webster, A.; Ribeiro, C.; Suzuki, M.; Wu, S.; Guan, J.C.; Stewart, J.D.; Tracy, W.F.; Settles, A.M. Effects of long-term exposure to elevated temperature on Zea mays endosperm development during grain fill. Plant J. 2019, 99, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barnabás, B.; Jäger, K.; Fehér, A. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 11–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamori, W.; Hikosaka, K.; Way, D.A. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: Temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth. Res. 2014, 119, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Morell, M.; Rahman, S.; Regina, A.; Appels, R.; Li, Z. Wheat starch biosynthesis. Euphytica 2001, 119, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yamakawa, H.; Hirose, T.; Kuroda, M.; Yamaguchi, T. Comprehensive expression profiling of rice grain filling-related genes under high temperature using DNA microarray. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 258–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Commuri, P.; Jones, R.J. High temperatures during endosperm cell division in maize. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1122–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, D.; Cai, X.; Yan, F.; Sun, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, W. Effects of high temperature after pollination on physicochemical properties of waxy maize flour during grain development. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1416–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cárcova, J.; Otegui, M.E. Ear temperature and pollination timing effects on maize kernel set. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1809–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cicchino, M.; Edreira, J.; Uribelarrea, M.; Otegui, M. Heat stress in field-grown maize: Response of physiological determinants of grain yield. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, 1438–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, H.; Gu, X.-t.; Ding, M.-q.; Lu, W.-p.; Lu, D.-l. Weakened carbon and nitrogen metabolisms under post-silking heat stress reduce the yield and dry matter accumulation in waxy maize. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 19, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thompson, L.M. Weather variability, climatic change, and grain production. Science 1975, 188, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lobell, D.B.; Bänziger, M.; Magorokosho, C.; Vivek, B. Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2011, 1, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Thakur, P.; Kumar, S.; Malik, J.A.; Berger, J.D.; Nayyar, H. Cold stress effects on reproductive development in grain crops: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 67, 429–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wijewardana, C.; Henry, W.B.; Hock, M.W.; Reddy, K.R. Growth and physiological trait variation among corn hybrids for cold tolerance. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 96, 639–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Farooq, M.; Aziz, T.; Wahid, A.; Lee, D.-J.; Siddique, K.H. Chilling tolerance in maize: Agronomic and physiological approaches. Crop Pasture Sci. 2009, 60, 501–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, J.; Xu, W.; Velten, J.; Xin, Z.; Stout, J. Characterization of maize inbred lines for drought and heat tolerance. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2012, 67, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hund, A.; Richner, W.; Soldati, A.; Fracheboud, Y.; Stamp, P. Root morphology and photosynthetic performance of maize inbred lines at low temperature. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 27, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hayashi, T. Varietal difference in the effects of low temperature on tassel development in hybrid maize. Plant Prod. Sci. 2016, 19, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hayashi, T.; Makino, T.; Sato, N.; Deguchi, K. Barrenness and changes in tassel development and flowering habit of hybrid maize associated with low air temperatures. Plant Prod. Sci. 2015, 18, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Panison, F.; Sangoi, L.; Kolling, D.F.; Coelho, C.M.M.d.; Durli, M.M. Épocas de colheita e desempenho agronômico de híbridos de milho com ciclos de crescimento contrastantes. Acta Sci. Agron. 2016, 38, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Liu, Y.; Liang, J.; Sun, L.; Yang, X.; Li, D. Group 3 LEA protein, ZmLEA3, is involved in protection from low temperature stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Rymen, B.; Fiorani, F.; Kartal, F.; Vandepoele, K.; Inzé, D.; Beemster, G.T. Cold nights impair leaf growth and cell cycle progression in maize through transcriptional changes of cell cycle genes. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Bano, S.; Aslam, M.; Saleem, M.; Basra, S.; Aziz, K. Evaluation of maize accessions under low temperature stress at early growth stages. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2015, 25, 392–400. [Google Scholar]
  60. Riva-Roveda, L.; Escale, B.; Giauffret, C.; Périlleux, C. Maize plants can enter a standby mode to cope with chilling stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sun, J.; Zheng, T.; Yu, J.; Wu, T.; Wang, X.; Chen, G.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Terzaghi, W. TSV, a putative plastidic oxidoreductase, protects rice chloroplasts from cold stress during development by interacting with plastidic thioredoxin Z. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Bilska-Kos, A.; Solecka, D.; Dziewulska, A.; Ochodzki, P.; Jończyk, M.; Bilski, H.; Sowiński, P. Low temperature caused modifications in the arrangement of cell wall pectins due to changes of osmotic potential of cells of maize leaves (Zea mays L.). Protoplasma 2017, 254, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lukatkin, A. Contribution of oxidative stress to the development of cold-induced damage to leaves of chilling-sensitive plants: 3. Injury of cell membranes by chilling temperatures. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 50, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, Q.; Hallerman, E.; Peng, Y.; Li, Y. Development of Bt rice and Bt maize in China and their efficacy in target pest control. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Esim, N.; Atici, Ö. Relationships between some endogenous signal compounds and the antioxidantsystem in response to chilling stress in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Turk. J. Bot. 2016, 40, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yan, G.U.; Cao, M.K.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Sun, Y.; Wen-He, H.U.; Chun-Sheng, W.U. Effects of low temperature on photosynthetic fluorescence and enzyme activity of carbon metabolism of maize at booting stage. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 51, 941–948. [Google Scholar]
  69. Steward, P.R.; Dougill, A.J.; Thierfelder, C.; Pittelkow, C.M.; Stringer, L.C.; Kudzala, M.; Shackelford, G.E. The adaptive capacity of maize-based conservation agriculture systems to climate stress in tropical and subtropical environments: A meta-regression of yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 251, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xiukang, W.; Zhanbin, L.; Yingying, X. Effects of mulching and nitrogen on soil temperature, water content, nitrate-N content and maize yield in the Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 161, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Caubel, J.; de Cortazar-Atauri, I.G.; Vivant, A.; Launay, M.; de Noblet-Ducoudré, N. Assessing future meteorological stresses for grain maize in France. Agric. Syst. 2018, 159, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, Z.; Hubbard, K.G.; Lin, X.; Yang, X. Negative effects of climate warming on maize yield are reversed by the changing of sowing date and cultivar selection in Northeast China. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 3481–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lana, M.A.; Vasconcelos, A.C.F.; Gornott, C.; Schaffert, A.; Bonatti, M.; Volk, J.; Graef, F.; Kersebaum, K.C.; Sieber, S. Is dry soil planting an adaptation strategy for maize cultivation in semi-arid Tanzania? Food Secur. 2018, 10, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Liu, Q.; Zou, Y.; Liu, X.; Linge, N. A survey on rainfall forecasting using artificial neural network. Int. J. Educ. Sci. 2019, 11, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Challinor, A.J.; Koehler, A.-K.; Ramirez-Villegas, J.; Whitfield, S.; Das, B. Current warming will reduce yields unless maize breeding and seed systems adapt immediately. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Waqas, M.A.; Kaya, C.; Riaz, A.; Farooq, M.; Nawaz, I.; Wilkes, A.; Li, Y. Potential mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants induced by thiourea. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wimalasekera, R. Role of seed quality in improving crop yields. In Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 153–168. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Anjum, S.A.; Hussain, S. Seed priming toward enhanced chilling tolerance in field crops: An overview. In Priming and Pretreatment of Seeds and Seedlings; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 265–286. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hussain, S.; Khan, F.; Hussain, H.A.; Nie, L. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of seed priming-induced chilling tolerance in rice cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Imran, M.; Mahmood, A.; Römheld, V.; Neumann, G. Nutrient seed priming improves seedling development of maize exposed to low root zone temperatures during early growth. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 49, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, C.; Guo, G.; Luo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hu, W.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Guan, Y. The synergistic priming effect of exogenous salicylic acid and H2O2 on chilling tolerance enhancement during maize (Zea mays L.) seed germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Li, L.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Nkeshimana, J. The effects of seed film coating with cold-tolerant agents on physiology and biochemistry changes of supersweet corn in low temperature stress. J. Zhejiang Univ. Agric. Life Sci. 2004, 30, 311–317. [Google Scholar]
  83. Guan, Y.; Li, Z.; He, F.; Huang, Y.; Song, W.; Hu, J. “On-off” thermoresponsive coating agent containing salicylic acid applied to maize seeds for chilling tolerance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Lizárraga-Paulín, E.-G.; Miranda-Castro, S.-P.; Moreno-Martínez, E.; Lara-Sagahón, A.-V.; Torres-Pacheco, I. Maize seed coatings and seedling sprayings with chitosan and hydrogen peroxide: Their influence on some phenological and biochemical behaviors. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2013, 14, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Oláh, C.; Ludmerszki, E.; Rácz, I.; Balassa, G.; Rudnóy, S. S-methylmethionine-salicylate pretreatment reduces low temperature stress in maize. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 65, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sharif, R.; Xie, C.; Zhang, H.; Arnao, M.B.; Ali, M.; Ali, Q.; Muhammad, I.; Shalmani, A.; Nawaz, M.A.; Chen, P. Melatonin and its effects on plant systems. Molecules 2018, 23, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Nawaz, M.A.; Huang, Y.; Bie, Z.; Ahmed, W.; Reiter, R.J.; Niu, M.; Hameed, S. Corrigendum: Melatonin: Current status and future perspectives in plant science. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ahmad, I.; Basra, S.M.A.; Akram, M.; Wasaya, A.; Ansar, M.; Hussain, S.; Iqbal, A.; Hussain, S.A. Improvement of antioxidant activities and yield of spring maize through seed priming and foliar application of plant growth regulators under heat stress conditions. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2017, 38, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ahmad, I.; Basra, S.M.A.; Wahid, A. Exogenous application of ascorbic acid, salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide improves the productivity of hybrid maize at low temperature stress. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2014, 16, 825–830. [Google Scholar]
  90. ur Rehman, H.; Iqbal, H.; Basra, S.M.; Afzal, I.; Farooq, M.; Wakeel, A.; Ning, W. Seed priming improves early seedling vigor, growth and productivity of spring maize. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bakhtavar, M.A.; Afzal, I.; Basra, S.M.A.; Noor, M.A. Physiological strategies to improve the performance of spring maize (Zea mays L.) planted under early and optimum sowing conditions. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Afzal, I.; Noor, M.; Bakhtavar, M.; Ahmad, A.; Haq, Z. Improvement of spring maize performance through physical and physiological seed enhancements. Seed Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Naveed, M.; Ahsan, M.; Akram, H.M.; Aslam, M.; Ahmed, N. Genetic effects conferring heat tolerance in a cross of tolerant × susceptible maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Zafar, S.A.; Hameed, A.; Ashraf, M.; Khan, A.S.; Qamar, Z.U.; Li, X.; Siddique, K.H.M. Agronomic, physiological and molecular characterisation of rice mutants revealed the key role of reactive oxygen species and catalase in high-temperature stress tolerance. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020, 47, 440–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cairns, J.E.; Prasanna, B. Developing and deploying climate-resilient maize varieties in the developing world. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Edmeades, G.; Bolaños, J.; Hernandez, M.; Bello, S. Causes for silk delay in a lowland tropical maize population. Crop Sci. 1993, 33, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Roitsch, T.; Cabrera-Bosquet, L.; Fournier, A.; Ghamkhar, K.; Jiménez-Berni, J.; Pinto, F.; Ober, E.S. Review: New sensors and data-driven approaches—A path to next generation phenomics. Plant Sci. 2019, 282, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chenu, K.; Van Oosterom, E.J.; McLean, G.; Deifel, K.S.; Fletcher, A.; Geetika, G.; Tirfessa, A.; Mace, E.S.; Jordan, D.R.; Sulman, R.; et al. Integrating modelling and phenotyping approaches to identify and screen complex traits: Transpiration efficiency in cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3181–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Atlin, G.N.; Cairns, J.E.; Das, B. Rapid breeding and varietal replacement are critical to adaptation of cropping systems in the developing world to climate change. Glob. Food Secur. 2017, 12, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Takai, T.; Adachi, S.; Taguchi-Shiobara, F.; Sanoh-Arai, Y.; Iwasawa, N.; Yoshinaga, S.; Hirose, S.; Taniguchi, Y.; Yamanouchi, U.; Wu, J. A natural variant of NAL1, selected in high-yield rice breeding programs, pleiotropically increases photosynthesis rate. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rehman, S.U.; Bilal, M.; Rana, R.M.; Tahir, M.N.; Shah, M.K.N.; Ayalew, H.; Yan, G. Cell membrane stability and chlorophyll content variation in wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes under conditions of heat and drought. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016, 67, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zafar, S.A.; Noor, M.A.; Waqas, M.A.; Wang, X.; Shaheen, T.; Raza, M. Temperature Extremes in Cotton Production and Mitigation Strategies. Past, Present and Future Trends in Cotton Breeding; Rahman, M.R., Zafar, Y., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 65–91. [Google Scholar]
  103. Cerrudo, D.; González, L.P.; Lugo, M.J.; Trachsel, S. Stay-green and associated vegetative indices to breed maize adapted to heat and combined heat-drought stresses. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Niazi, I.A.K.; Rauf, S.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Munir, H. Comparison of teosinte (Zea mexicana L.) and inter-subspecific hybrids (Zea mays L. × Zea mexicana) for high forage yield under two sowing regimes. Crop Pasture Sci. 2015, 66, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Reeves, R.G. The use of teosinte in the improvement of corn inbreds. Agron. J. 1950, 42, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wijewardana, C.; Hock, M.; Henry, B.; Reddy, K.R. Screening corn hybrids for cold tolerance using morphological traits for early-season seeding. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 851–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Revilla, P.; Hotchkiss, J.; Tracy, W. Cold tolerance evaluation in a diallel among open-pollinated sweet corn cultivars. Hortscience 2003, 38, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shi, Y.; Li, G.; Tian, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Guo, S.; Qi, J.; Zhang, X. Genetic dissection of seed vigour traits in maize (Zea mays L.) under low-temperature conditions. J. Genet. 2016, 95, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Eagles, H.; Brooking, I. Populations of maize with more rapid and reliable seedling emergence than cornbelt dents at low temperatures. Euphytica 1981, 30, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bhosale, S.; Rymen, B.; Beemster, G.; Melchinger, A.; Reif, J. Chilling tolerance of central European maize lines and their factorial crosses. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 1315–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Rahman, S.U.; Arif, M.; Hussain, K.; Hussain, S.; Mukhtar, T.; Razaq, A.; Iqbal, R.A. Evaluation of maize hybrids for tolerance to high temperature stress in central Punjab. Am. J. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2013, 1, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ristic, Z.; Yang, G.; Martin, B.; Fullerton, S. Evidence of association between specific heat-shock protein (s) and the drought and heat tolerance phenotype in maize. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 153, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rodríguez, V.; Butrón, A.; Sandoya, G.; Ordás, A.; Revilla, P. Combining maize base germplasm for cold tolerance breeding. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Ku, L.; Tian, L.; Su, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Wu, L.; Shi, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H. Dual functions of the ZmCCT-associated quantitative trait locus in flowering and stress responses under long-day conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Verschwele, A. Is there a weed shift in Roundup Ready maize? In Proceedings of the 21ème Conférence du COLUMA. Journées Internationales sur la Lutte contre les Mauvaises Herbes, Dijon, France, 8–9 December 2010; pp. 110–119. [Google Scholar]
  116. Shokat, S.; Sehgal, D.; Vikram, P.; Liu, F.; Singh, S. Molecular markers associated with agro-physiological traits under terminal drought conditions in bread wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gazal, A.; Dar, Z.; Wani, S.; Lone, A.; Shikari, A.; Ali, G.; Abidi, I. Molecular breeding for enhancing resilience against biotic and abiotic stress in major cereals. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 2016, 48, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  118. Frey, F.P.; Presterl, T.; Lecoq, P.; Orlik, A.; Stich, B. First steps to understand heat tolerance of temperate maize at adult stage: Identification of QTL across multiple environments with connected segregating populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 945–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Rodríguez, V.M.; Soengas, P.; Alonso-Villaverde, V.; Sotelo, T.; Cartea, M.E.; Velasco, P. Effect of temperature stress on the early vegetative development of Brassica oleracea L. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Fracheboud, Y.; Ribaut, J.M.; Vargas, M.; Messmer, R.; Stamp, P. Identification of quantitative trait loci for cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1967–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Ye, C.; Tenorio, F.A.; Argayoso, M.A.; Laza, M.A.; Koh, H.-J.; Redoña, E.D.; Jagadish, K.S.; Gregorio, G.B. Identifying and confirming quantitative trait loci associated with heat tolerance at flowering stage in different rice populations. BMC Genet. 2015, 16, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Revilla, P.; Rodríguez, V.M.; Ordás, A.; Rincent, R.; Charcosset, A.; Giauffret, C.; Melchinger, A.E.; Schön, C.-C.; Bauer, E.; Altmann, T. Association mapping for cold tolerance in two large maize inbred panels. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Yan, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, W.; Qin, X.; Wang, Y.; Yue, B. Genetic mapping with testcrossing associations and F 2: 3 populations reveals the importance of heterosis in chilling tolerance at maize seedling stage. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hu, G.; Li, Z.; Lu, Y.; Li, C.; Gong, S.; Yan, S.; Li, G.; Wang, M.; Ren, H.; Guan, H.; et al. Genome-wide association study identified multiple genetic loci on chilling resistance during germination in maize. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T.; Yang, X.; Li, D. Functional characterization of KS-type dehydrin ZmDHN13 and its related conserved domains under oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, C.-T.; Ru, J.-N.; Liu, Y.-W.; Li, M.; Zhao, D.; Yang, J.-F.; Fu, J.-D.; Xu, Z.-S. Maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY106 confers drought and heat tolerance in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Song, X.; Weng, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, H.; Song, J.; Su, L.; Yuan, J.; Liu, Y. Cloning and expression analysis of ZmERD3 gene from Zea mays. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, e1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Ma, H.; Liu, C.; Li, Z.; Ran, Q.; Xie, G.; Wang, B.; Fang, S.; Chu, J.; Zhang, J. ZmbZIP4 contributes to stress resistance in maize by regulating ABA synthesis and root development. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 753–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Gao, J.; Wang, S.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, S.; Dong, C.; Mu, C.; Song, Y.; Ma, P.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Linkage mapping and genome-wide association reveal candidate genes conferring thermotolerance of seed-set in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4849–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ahmed, S.; Rashid, M.A.R.; Zafar, S.A.; Azhar, M.T.; Waqas, M.; Uzair, M.; Rana, I.A.; Azeem, F.; Chung, G.; Ali, Z.; et al. Genome-wide investigation and expression analysis of APETALA-2 transcription factor subfamily reveals its evolution, expansion and regulatory role in abiotic stress responses in Indica Rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Genomics 2021, 113, 1029–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Shi, J.; Yan, B.; Lou, X.; Ma, H.; Ruan, S. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the transcriptional alterations in heat-resistant and heat-sensitive sweet maize (Zea mays L.) varieties under heat stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Sobkowiak, A.; Jończyk, M.; Jarochowska, E.; Biecek, P.; Trzcinska-Danielewicz, J.; Leipner, J.; Fronk, J.; Sowiński, P. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of response to low temperature reveals candidate genes determining divergent cold-sensitivity of maize inbred lines. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 85, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Li, Z.; Hu, G.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, D.; Wang, T. Transcriptome sequencing identified genes and gene ontologies associated with early freezing tolerance in maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Di Fenza, M.; Hogg, B.; Grant, J.; Barth, S. Transcriptomic response of maize primary roots to low temperatures at seedling emergence. PeerJ 2017, 5, e2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Chun, Y.; Fang, J.; Zafar, S.A.; Shang, J.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Li, X. Mini Seed 2 (MIS2) encodes a receptor-like kinase that controls grain size and shape in rice. Rice 2020, 13, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Silva-Neta, I.; Pinho, E.; Veiga, A.; Pìnho, R.; Guimarães, R.; Caixeta, F.; Santos, H.; Marques, T. Expression of genes related to tolerance to low temperature for maize seed germination. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 2674–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lee, J.; Lim, Y.-P.; Han, C.-T.; Nou, I.-S.; Hur, Y. Genome-wide expression profiles of contrasting inbred lines of Chinese cabbage, Chiifu and Kenshin, under temperature stress. Genes Genom. 2013, 35, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, X.; Shan, X.; Xue, C.; Wu, Y.; Su, S.; Li, S.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y. Isolation and functional characterization of a cold responsive phosphatidylinositol transfer-associated protein, ZmSEC14p, from maize (Zea may L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 1671–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Zafar, S.A.; Zaidi, S.S.-e.-A.; Gaba, Y.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Dhankher, O.P.; Li, X.; Mansoor, S.; Pareek, A. Engineering abiotic stress tolerance via CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Zaidi, S.S.-e.-A.; Mukhtar, M.S.; Mansoor, S. Genome editing: Targeting susceptibility genes for plant disease resistance. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 898–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Shan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Gao, C.; Qiu, J.-L. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Pyott, D.E.; Sheehan, E.; Molnar, A. Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated potyvirus resistance in transgene-free Arabidopsis plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 1276–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Shi, J.; Gao, H.; Wang, H.; Lafitte, H.R.; Archibald, R.L.; Yang, M.; Hakimi, S.M.; Mo, H.; Habben, J.E. ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Shi, J.; Habben, J.E.; Archibald, R.L.; Drummond, B.J.; Chamberlin, M.A.; Williams, R.W.; Lafitte, H.R.; Weers, B.P. Overexpression of ARGOS genes modifies plant sensitivity to ethylene, leading to improved drought tolerance in both arabidopsis and maize. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Klap, C.; Yeshayahou, E.; Bolger, A.M.; Arazi, T.; Gupta, S.K.; Shabtai, S.; Usadel, B.; Salts, Y.; Barg, R. Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from Sl AGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of function. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 634–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Woo, J.W.; Kim, J.; Kwon, S.I.; Corvalan, C.; Cho, S.W.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, S.T.; Choe, S.; Kim, J.S. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 1162–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Svitashev, S.; Schwartz, C.; Lenderts, B.; Young, J.K.; Cigan, M.A. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Zhang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Zong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, K.; Qiu, J.-L.; Gao, C. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Shokat, S.; Großkinsky, D.K. Tackling salinity in sustainable agriculture—What developing countries may learn from approaches of the developed world. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Tandzi, N.L.; Mutengwa, C.S. Estimation of maize (Zea mays L.) yield per harvest area: Appropriate methods. Agronomy 2020, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Mngqawa, P.; Mangena-Netshikweta, L.M.; Katerere, D.R. Grain production by rural subsistence farmers in selected districts of Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces South Africa. PULA Botsw. J. Afr. Stud. 2016, 30, 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  152. Harrison, L.; Michaelsen, J.; Funk, C.; Husak, G. Effects of temperature changes on maize production in Mozambique. Clim. Res. 2011, 46, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Ribaut, J.M.; de Vicente, M.C.; Delannay, X. Molecular breeding in developing countries: Challenges and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Tian, C.; Sajjad, M.; Gao, C.; Tong, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiao, Y. Transcriptome association identifies regulators of wheat spike architecture. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 746–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Zaidi, S.S.-E.A.; Naqvi, R.Z.; Asif, M.; Strickler, S.; Shakir, S.; Shafiq, M.; Khan, A.M.; Amin, I.; Mishra, B.; Mukhtar, M.S.; et al. Molecular insight into cotton leaf curl geminivirus disease resistance in cultivated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 691–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Reduced seed setting in summer maize (ZD958 sown in Hebei, China, in 2018) exposed to heat stress at the pollination stage. The temperature exceeded 35 °C at the time of pollen shed, affecting the pollen reception by initially emerged silks at the base of the ear as compared to the tip of the ear for late-emerging silks.
Figure 1. Reduced seed setting in summer maize (ZD958 sown in Hebei, China, in 2018) exposed to heat stress at the pollination stage. The temperature exceeded 35 °C at the time of pollen shed, affecting the pollen reception by initially emerged silks at the base of the ear as compared to the tip of the ear for late-emerging silks.
Plants 10 00293 g001
Figure 2. Chilling injury to maize plant after cold stress (XY335 sown in Hebei, China, in 2018). Leaf of maize plant affected by night cold wind of 2–4 °C, showing leaf wilting to leaf blade at the late reproductive stage.
Figure 2. Chilling injury to maize plant after cold stress (XY335 sown in Hebei, China, in 2018). Leaf of maize plant affected by night cold wind of 2–4 °C, showing leaf wilting to leaf blade at the late reproductive stage.
Plants 10 00293 g002
Figure 3. The influence of thermal stress on reproductive development in maize. Thermal stresses cause anther sterility and pollen abortion in the sensitive varieties, which lead to a lack of pollen tube growth and fertilization. This abnormality ultimately leads to a lack of seed setting in the maize cobs. On the other hand, tolerant varieties maintain their anthers and thus have viable pollens inside them, which leads to successful fertilization and normal seed setting.
Figure 3. The influence of thermal stress on reproductive development in maize. Thermal stresses cause anther sterility and pollen abortion in the sensitive varieties, which lead to a lack of pollen tube growth and fertilization. This abnormality ultimately leads to a lack of seed setting in the maize cobs. On the other hand, tolerant varieties maintain their anthers and thus have viable pollens inside them, which leads to successful fertilization and normal seed setting.
Plants 10 00293 g003
Figure 4. Overview of the impacts of cold and heat stresses on critical growth phases of maize crop. Heat stress impacts are marked by red fonts, while blue fonts indicate impacts of cold stress. Combined impacts (which can be caused by both stresses) are marked by black fonts.
Figure 4. Overview of the impacts of cold and heat stresses on critical growth phases of maize crop. Heat stress impacts are marked by red fonts, while blue fonts indicate impacts of cold stress. Combined impacts (which can be caused by both stresses) are marked by black fonts.
Plants 10 00293 g004
Figure 5. A simplified pattern representing the potential mechanisms involved in yield loss avoidance by heat-tolerant maize. Tolerant maize genotypes activate stress signaling and heat shock proteins (HSPs) and maintain redox homeostasis. HSPs improve protein and thylakoid stability and carbon assimilation to maintain high photosynthetic activity under heat stress. Leaves and tassels are more thermostable to avoid leaf firing and tassel blast, respectively. Lower leaf angle enhances radiation use efficiency by avoiding light saturation and increasing light penetration into the canopy. It also contributes to the quick cooling of leaves after exposure to heat. Waxy leaves guarantee a satisfactory water status in plants and higher water use efficiency. Thicker stem accumulates more carbon reserves for ear and kernel development. Heat-tolerant maize also has a deep rooting system to acquire scarce resources such as water and nutrients under stress environments.
Figure 5. A simplified pattern representing the potential mechanisms involved in yield loss avoidance by heat-tolerant maize. Tolerant maize genotypes activate stress signaling and heat shock proteins (HSPs) and maintain redox homeostasis. HSPs improve protein and thylakoid stability and carbon assimilation to maintain high photosynthetic activity under heat stress. Leaves and tassels are more thermostable to avoid leaf firing and tassel blast, respectively. Lower leaf angle enhances radiation use efficiency by avoiding light saturation and increasing light penetration into the canopy. It also contributes to the quick cooling of leaves after exposure to heat. Waxy leaves guarantee a satisfactory water status in plants and higher water use efficiency. Thicker stem accumulates more carbon reserves for ear and kernel development. Heat-tolerant maize also has a deep rooting system to acquire scarce resources such as water and nutrients under stress environments.
Plants 10 00293 g005
Table 2. The impacts of heat stress on maize grain yield.
Table 2. The impacts of heat stress on maize grain yield.
Growth StageTemperatureYield Reduction (%)Country/RegionReferences
Silking6 °C above ambient canopy temperature for 3 days13%USA[16]
Grain filling35 °C31%China[35]
Pre- and post-flowering33 to 36 °C10–45%Argentina[29]
Tasseling stage30–38 °C for 15 days14–17%China[24]
Grain filling28–32 °C10%US corn belt[47]
Reproductive stagesEach degree above 30 °C1–1.7%Africa[48]
Table 3. Use of plant growth regulators to minimize the impacts of heat and cold stresses at critical phases of maize crop.
Table 3. Use of plant growth regulators to minimize the impacts of heat and cold stresses at critical phases of maize crop.
StrategyPlant Growth RegulatorsConcentrationSuboptimal Temperature and Growth StageIndicators of Stress AlleviationIncrement in Yield (%)Reference
Seed primingFe8.5 mMChilling (12 °C) stress at seedling stageBetter early seedling growth, germination, and nutrient uptake13[80]
Seed primingSA20 mg L−1Chilling (10 °C) stress at seedling stageImproved antioxidant enzymatic activities, water status, chlorophyll contents, and membranes structure25[89]
Seed primingCaCl22.2%Chilling (12 °C) stress at seedling stageImproved leaf expansion; net assimilation 12[90]
Seed primingKinetin100 mg L−1Heat stress (38 °C) at reproductive stageimproved stand establishment and phenolic contents and increased leaf area expansion and grain filling period18[91]
Magnetic seed stimulation-150 mT for three minutesChilling stress (≤10 °C) at stand establishmentImproved chlorophyll, phenolics, and gaseous exchange attributes20[92]
Foliar applicationThiourea0.1%Chilling stress (≤12 °C) at reproductive stageImproved crop growth rate, water use efficiency, photosynthetic rate, and dry matter accumulation21[18]
Foliar applicationMoringa leaf extract3%Heat stress (38 °C) at reproductive stageIncrease in leaf expansion and grain filling duration17[91]
Foliar applicationAsA20 mg L−1Heat stress (38 °C) at reproductive stageIncrease in antioxidant activities and membrane stability 23[88]
Foliar applicationH2O220 mg L−1Heat stress (38 °C) at reproductive stageEnhanced SOD, CAT, and POD activities and grain weight23[88]
Table 5. Potential genes related to temperature stress tolerance in maize.
Table 5. Potential genes related to temperature stress tolerance in maize.
GeneTarget TraitEffect of GeneApproach Used to Characterize Gene FunctionReference
ZmDHN13Abiotic stressesOxidative balanceOver-expression[125]
ZmWRKY106Heat toleranceReactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengingOver-expression[126]
ZmERD3Heat and coldmRNA accumulationqRT-PCR[127]
ZmbZIP4Abiotic stressesAbscisic acid (ABA) synthesisImmunoprecipitation sequencing[128]
GRMZM2G377194Thermo-toleranceIncreased seed setQuantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping plus genome-wide association studies (GWAS)[129]
GRMZM2G060349Thermo-toleranceIncreased seed setQTL mapping plus GWAS[129]
GRMZM2G122199Thermo-toleranceIncreased seed setQTL mapping plus GWAS[129]
GRMZM2G026892Thermo-toleranceIncreased seed setQTL mapping plus GWAS[129]
GRMZM2G148998Heat toleranceHigh grain yieldQTL mapping and potential gene analysis[118]
GRMZM2G115658Heat toleranceHigh grain yieldQTL mapping and potential gene analysis[118]
GRMZM2G537291Heat toleranceHigh grain yieldQTL mapping and potential gene analysis[118]
GRMZM2G324886Heat toleranceHigh grain yieldQTL mapping and potential gene analysis[118]
GRMZM2G436710Heat toleranceHigh grain yieldQTL mapping and potential gene analysis[118]
GRMZM2G094990Heat toleranceHigh grain yieldQTL mapping and potential gene analysis[118]
GRMZM2G178486Cold toleranceImproved germinationGene cloning plus GWAS[124]
GRMZM5G806387Cold toleranceImproved germinationGene cloning plus GWAS[124]
GRMZM2G148793Cold toleranceImproved germinationGene cloning plus GWAS[124]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Waqas, M.A.; Wang, X.; Zafar, S.A.; Noor, M.A.; Hussain, H.A.; Azher Nawaz, M.; Farooq, M. Thermal Stresses in Maize: Effects and Management Strategies. Plants 2021, 10, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020293

AMA Style

Waqas MA, Wang X, Zafar SA, Noor MA, Hussain HA, Azher Nawaz M, Farooq M. Thermal Stresses in Maize: Effects and Management Strategies. Plants. 2021; 10(2):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed, Xiukang Wang, Syed Adeel Zafar, Mehmood Ali Noor, Hafiz Athar Hussain, Muhammad Azher Nawaz, and Muhammad Farooq. 2021. "Thermal Stresses in Maize: Effects and Management Strategies" Plants 10, no. 2: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop