Next Article in Journal
Semisolid Dosage
Next Article in Special Issue
Polishing the Therapy of Onychomycosis Induced by Candida spp.: Amphotericin B–Loaded Nail Lacquer
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Administration System Based on Meloxicam Nanocrystals: Decreased Dose Due to High Bioavailability Attenuates Risk of Gastrointestinal Side Effects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Drug Permeation from 8% Ciclopirox Cyclodextrin/Poloxamer-Soluble Polypseudorotaxane-Based Nail Lacquers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/pharmaceutics12040314
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fluconazole and Lipopeptide Surfactin Interplay During Candida albicans Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall Remodeling Increases Fungal Immune System Exposure

by
Jakub Suchodolski
1,
Daria Derkacz
1,
Jakub Muraszko
1,
Jarosław J. Panek
2,
Aneta Jezierska
2,
Marcin Łukaszewicz
1 and
Anna Krasowska
1,*
1
Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wroclaw, 50-383 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wroclaw, 50-383 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2020, 12(4), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12040314
Submission received: 19 February 2020 / Revised: 27 March 2020 / Accepted: 30 March 2020 / Published: 1 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal and Antiparasitic Drug Delivery Volume II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recognizing the β-glucan component of the Candida albicans cell wall is a necessary step involved in host immune system recognition. Compounds that result in exposed β-glucan recognizable to the immune system could be valuable antifungal drugs. Antifungal development is especially important because fungi are becoming increasingly drug resistant. This study demonstrates that lipopeptide, surfactin, unmasks β-glucan when the C. albicans cells lack ergosterol. This observation also holds when ergosterol is depleted by fluconazole. Surfactin does not enhance the effects of local chitin accumulation in the presence of fluconazole. Expression of the CHS3 gene, encoding a gene product resulting in 80% of cellular chitin, is downregulated. C. albicans exposure to fluconazole changes the composition and structure of the fungal plasma membrane. At the same time, the fungal cell wall is altered and remodeled in a way that makes the fungi susceptible to surfactin. In silico studies show that surfactin can form a complex with β-glucan. Surfactin forms a less stable complex with chitin, which in combination with lowering chitin synthesis, could be a second anti-fungal mechanism of action of this lipopeptide.

1. Introduction

Candida albicans is a component of the resident microflora present in the human digestive tract, skin, and mucosal membranes. It is an opportunistic human pathogen, meaning infections normally occur only in immunocompromised individuals. Systemic C. albicans infections can occur after invasive medical treatments like injections and surgeries. The mortality rate is near 40% for systemic infections [1]. One contributing factor to the mortality rate is the ability of C. albicans to effectively hide from the immune system due to its normal environmental niche as a member of the resident microbiota [2,3]. Another contributing factor to the mortality rate is that safe and effective treatment options are limited. Since the discovery of the first antifungal azole compound in 1944 [4], only a few new drug classes have been discovered [5]. In addition, all antifungal drug classes have a minimal number of targets. Azoles like fluconazole and itraconazole belong to a class of heterocyclic compounds containing a nitrogen atom and at least one other non-carbon atom. These compounds alter the plasma membrane (PM) by inhibiting sterol synthesis [6,7]. Polyenes like amphotericin B and nystatin also affect the PM by binding to ergosterol [8,9]. The newest class of antifungal compounds called echinocandins includes caspofungin and micafungin. Echinocandins are lipopeptides containing large cyclic (hexa)peptides that affect the cell wall by inhibiting β-glucan synthase [10,11]. Thus, many antifungal drug classes primarily target the PM and the cell wall.
The PM usually forms a boundary between the cell and its external environment. However, the C. albicans PM has no direct contact with the external environment. The outer surface of the C. albicans cell that has direct contact with the environment and the host immune system is called the cell wall [3]. The C. albicans cell wall is 90% carbohydrates and 10% proteins [12]. The fibrillar cell wall outer layer is mainly composed of mannoproteins. The carbohydrate components of the inner wall are β-glucans and chitin. This is the closest layer to the PM [13].
The cell wall serves many necessary cellular functions [14]. The cell wall maintains consistent cellular morphology and interacts with the external environment. Despite the cell wall’s function to maintain cellular shape and establish mechanical resistance, the fungal cell wall is exceptionally flexible and dynamic. The cell wall structure allows for rapid changes in cellular volume, cellular division, hyphae and pseudohyphae formation, and extracellular vesicle secretion. Cell wall remodeling affects fungal-host interactions by exposing major cell wall-associated proteins that are then recognized by innate immune cells. Cell wall remodeling depends on interplay between the PM and the cell wall. This interplay is a highly regulated process. Only a few studies describe interactions between the PM and cell wall. Drugs that target the PM must first interact with the cell wall in order to reach the PM. When these drugs reach the cell wall, they can possibly adhere, accumulate, and undergo structural and/or chemical modifications like changes in hydrophobicity [15]. After a drug has penetrated the cell wall and altered the PM, this process can, in turn, affect cell wall structure. Previous research has shown that exposing C. albicans to azoles, which interfere with sterol synthesis, affects chitin biosynthesis and deposition [16].
Similarly, when C. albicans is exposed to echinocandins, C. albicans upregulates chitin synthesis, reducing drug efficacy [17]. Cell wall structural changes have been observed in response to environmental stress and other changes. Masking immune-stimulating cell wall components facilitates immune evasion. However, cell wall remodeling may expose these components and lead to recognition of C. albicans by the immune system [18,19,20]. As it is difficult to discover totally new and efficient antifungal compounds, one prominent drug development strategy is to look for compounds that are synergistically active with existing therapeutic compounds [21].
Lipopeptides are promising compounds with the potential for synergy with existing antifungals [22]. Echinocandins are a group of compounds with these properties. Lipopeptides are composed of a hydrophobic fatty acid residue and a hydrophilic amino acid chain. These moieties are often enclosed in a ring by a lactone bond. Due to the chemical diversity of the fatty acid residue and the peptide chain, this is very large group of compounds. The fatty acid residue can have different chain lengths, different types of branching, or the presence of hydroxyl groups. The peptide chain may contain a variety of amino acids in both L and D configurations. Lipopeptides are produced by many microorganisms, including microorganisms present in the microbiome with the potential to affect colonization by C. albicans. Besides having surfactant activity, different lipopeptides have shown to have antibacterial, antifungal, anti-adhesion, quorum sensing, or anticancer activities [23,24,25]. For example, the lipopeptides pseudofactin II and surfactin (SU) decrease C. albicans adhesion and hydrophobicity [15,25]. SU is produced by Bacillus species, including B. subtilis strains used in production of fermented foods like natto [26]. The health benefits of consuming fermented foods may be related to the presence of SU and its ability to act upon pathogenic microorganisms. SU may integrate into the PM and change its properties.
In this study, we investigated synergistic activity between SU and azoles. Azoles block ergosterol biosynthesis through inhibition of the 14 α-methyl sterol demethylase (P450 cytochrome) encoded by the ERG11 gene. Strains containing a deletion in ERG11 show similar phenotypes to cells treated with azoles. Azole treatment results in accumulation of lanosterol instead of ergosterol in the PM. Both azole treatment and ERG11 deletion results in increased susceptibility of C. albicans to SU. These results show the strong synergistic activity of this biosurfactant with azoles. Modifying the PM affects cell wall shape and local accumulation of chitin. Changes in the cell wall lead to the unmasking of C. albicans chitin and β-glucan. Molecular dynamics studies show that SU can form intermolecular complexes with chitin and β-glucan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Growth Conditions

C. albicans strains used in this study were CAF2-1 (genotype: ura3Δ::imm434/URA3, treated here as wild type, WT) [27], and KS028 (genotype: same as CAF2-1 but erg11Δ::SAT1-FLIP/erg11Δ::FRT) [28]. The medium used to culture strains was yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium (1% yeast extract, (manufacturer: BD; distributor: Diag-med; Warszawa, Poland); 2% peptone, (manufacturer: BD; distributor: Diag-med; Warszawa, Poland) and 2% dextrose, (manufacturer: Bioshop; distributor: Lab Empire; Rzeszów, Poland). Agar (manufacturer: Bioshop; distributor: Lab Empire; Rzeszów, Poland) in a final concentration of 2% was used for medium solidification. For specific experiments, cells were grown in 20 mL of YPD (28 °C; shaking: 120 rpm; starting A600 = 0.1; with or without fluconazole (FLC) (Sigma-Aldrich; Poznan, Poland), surfactin (SU) or the combination of both drugs added at t = 0 h) until they reached the stationary phase (24 h).

2.2. Determination of Azole-SU Synergy, Percentage of Viability and Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Indexes

To assess the effects of azoles (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, miconazole or clotrimazole) (Sigma-Aldrich), SU or azole-SU combinations on C. albicans viability, we followed the protocol of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008), 3rd ed. M27-A3 [29], with modifications described before [30,31]. Stock solutions of xenobiotics (alone or in combination) were serially diluted in YPD medium using 96-well sterile plates (Sarstedt; Nümbrecht, Germany). They were then inoculated with C. albicans suspensions (final A600 per well = 0.01) and prepared in fresh YPD medium from 24 h YPD cultures. After 24 h incubation at 28 °C, A600 was measured (ASYS UVM 340 Biogenet; Józefów, Poland). The percentage of viability (% viability) of CAF2-1 and KS028 was determined by normalizing A600 to experiments where the condition without the addition of xenobiotics was counted as 100% viability. The concentrations of xenobiotics (alone or in combination) were determined as either ≥50% or ≥90% growth inhibition. Fractional inhibitory concentration indexes (FICI) were calculated according to the formula:
F I C I = S U   i n   c o m b i n a t i o n S U   a l o n e + A z o l e   i n   c o m b i n a t i o n A z o l e   a l o n e

2.3. Plasma Membrane (PM) Permeabilization

To assess the effects of SU on CAF2-1 and KS028 PM permeability we followed the propidium iodide (PI) (Bioshop) assay [32], with modifications. Briefly, CAF2-1 and KS028 were grown until stationary phase of growth (24 h), pelleted (4 k × g, 5 min) and resuspended in YPD of A600 = 0.1. Cells were exposed towards SU for 2 h at 28 °C, pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (Stanlab; Lublin, Poland) (4 k × g, 5 min) and resuspended in 0.9% saline with 6 µM PI for 5 min. Then, cells were pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (4 k × g, 5 min), concentrated and observed under a Zeiss Axio (Poznan, Poland) Imager A2 microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam 503 (Poznan, Poland )mono microscope camera and a Zeiss HBO100 mercury lamp (Poznan, Poland). The percentage of permeabilisation was evaluated by counting PI positive cells out of at least 200 cells in three independent replicates for each experiment (n = 600).

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Observations

SEM observations were performed to evaluate the effects of SU on CAF2-1 and KS028 ultrastructural cell surface changes according to Piętka-Ottlik et al. [33]. Briefly, C. albicans cells were pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (4 k × g, 5 min), resuspended to A600 = 1 in 0.9% saline and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde. The samples were subsequently treated with phosphate buffer in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, dehydrated by acetone washes and dried. SEM analyses were made with Hitachi S-3400N (Hitachi; Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a tungsten cathode (magnification 80–300.000x) at operation voltage of 15 keV. Micrographs have been acquired with a secondary electron detector (SE) and a backscattered electron detector (BSE).

2.5. Cell Wall Staining and Microscopic Observations

Total chitin visualization was performed by staining C. albicans cells with Calcofluor white (CFW) (Sigma-Aldrich), as described before [30], with modifications. Visualization of unmasked chitin was performed by staining C. albicans cells with wheat germ agglutinin conjugated with FITC (WGA-FITC) (Sigma-Aldrich), by modifying the protocol of Malavia et al. [34]. Unmasked β-glucans were stained according to the protocol of Wagener et al. [35]. In all cases, C. albicans cells were pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (4 k × g, 5 min) and resuspended (to A600 = 1) in 0.9% saline with either 12.5 µM CFW, 50 µg/mL WGA-FITC or 5 µg/mL Fc–hDectin-1 (Invivogen). After 1h incubation cells were pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (4 k × g, 5 min) and, in case of CFW and WGA-FITC staining, concentrated. Fc-hDectin-1 treated cells were incubated with 1:250 Alexa fluor 448-conjugated anti-human IgG Fc antibodies (Thermo fisher, Waltham, USA) for 1 h on ice. Afterwards, cells were pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (4 k × g, 5 min) and concentrated. Preparations were observed under Zeiss Axio Imager (Oberkochen, Germany) A2 microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam 503 mono microscope camera and a Zeiss HBO100 mercury lamp or in case of CFW-stained cells also under a Leica SP8 LSM confocal microscope.

2.6. Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Analyses

C. albicans cells were stained with WGA-FITC or Fc-hDectin-1 (Section 2.5) and fixed with 43.7% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich; Poznan, Poland) for 15 min, pelleted, washed twice with 0.9% saline (4 k × g, 5 min) and resuspended in 0.9% saline. For each FACS analysis, cell suspensions were diluted from 1:20 to 1:100 in 0.9% saline, and 5000 events were collected on a Millipore Guava easyCyte 5HT flow cytometer (Merck; Burlington, USA). Gates were set around the cell population using the forward and side scatter channels. Fluorescence signal was obtained by using blue laser included in flow cytometer with a wavelength of 488 nm. Data was analyzed using InCyte software provided by Millipore (Merck; Burlington, USA).

2.7. RNA Preparation, Reverse Transcription and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Total RNA from C. albicans cells was isolated according to TOTAL RNA MINI kit provided by A&A Biotechnology (Gdynia, Poland). Cell pellet was incubated for 5 min in 50 °C with 800 μL Phenol-containing fenozol, followed by addition of 200 μL chloroform. Samples were centrifuged (10 k × g, 10 min), top fractions were collected and mixed with 250 μL of isopropanol. Subsequently, samples were transferred to minicolumns, and procedure was continued accordingly to manual provided by manufacturer. RNA was eluted with clean Milli-Q water.
To obtain cDNA for further analyses, isolation of RNA was followed by reverse transcription. Reaction was performed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific; Waltham, USA). RNA samples were mixed with buffer, reversed transcriptase, random primers and deoxyribonucleotides and incubated for 120 min in 37 °C. Samples were used as a matrix in quantitative PCR reaction.
Genes expression levels were measured by quantitative PCR, which was performed with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix kit (BioRad; Warszawa, Poland). Reactions were run using Step One Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific). Calculations of gene expression levels were performed as previously described [36]. The following gene-specific primers were used: RDN18F (5′-AGAAACGGCTACCACATCCAA-3′), RDN18R (5′-GGGCCCTGTATCGTTATTTATTGT-3′), CHS3F (5′-GACGATCTTTTGTTGGTAATCC-3′), CHS3R (5′-CAAGTCATTTCATCTTCAAGACC-3′), CHS4F (5′-CACCGGGATCCAATATGC-3′), CHS4R (5′-GAAACAGTCTTTGTGACGAC-3′), GSC1F (5′-GGTGGTCTAATTAATCTTGATGG-3′), GSC1R (5′-GTCGGAATTTGCTGGTG-3′), GSL1F (5′- GCTGCTTTTGTACATTTTGC-3′), GSL1R (5′-GAAATTCGAAATGATTCTATGGC-3′) KRE9F (5′-CCATAATAAGATGTGTTGTTGCAG-3′), KRE9R (5′-TCCAAAGATTTCGGTGAGTC-3′).

2.8. Computational Methodology

The initial model of the SU was based on the B. subtilis SU with C14 aliphatic chain and the sequence ELLVDLL (amino acid configuration LLDLLDL), PDB ID: 2NPV [37]. The hexameric N-acetylglucosamine and β-D-glucose representing chitin and β-glucan respectively were drawn manually in linear arrangement using the Molden 4.9 program [38]. The molecular topologies and parameters were then prepared using Antechamber module of the Amber2015 suite of programs [39] and general-organic Amber force field GAFF [40] with AM1-BCC [41] atomic charges. Then, initial structures were prepared by placing the SU and hexasaccharide molecules in separation of approximately 4 Å, placing them in a cuboid box, neutralizing with randomly placed Na+ ions, and solvating the box with TIP3P water [42]. The noncovalent interaction cutoff was set to 10 Å, and the long-range electrostatics was treated with Particle Mesh Ewald [43] technique. Further simulations proceeded in the following manner: Initial steepest-descent minimization of 1000 steps was used to remove bad contacts. Then, constant-volume (NVT) thermalization at 300 K was carried out for 100 ps, followed by 400 ps of constant-pressure equilibration at T = 300 K, p = 1 atm. The final NVT production run lasted for 100 ns. All the molecular dynamics runs used time step of 1 fs and Andersen temperature coupling scheme with collision frequency of 1 ps [44]. Each of the two cases, SU-chitin and SU-β-glucan complexes, was run in triplicate so that the random generation of initial velocity distribution and thermostatting collisions allowed the three runs for each system to explore different parts of the conformational space. The post-production analysis and visualization were carried out with the tools of the Amber2015 suite of programs and with the Visual Molecular Dynamics VMD 1.9.3 program [45].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Unless stated otherwise, data represent the means ± standard errors from at least 3 biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test (binomial, unpaired). Microscopic observations and FACS analyses were performed at least in 3 independent replicates, representatives were included in figures.

3. Results

3.1. C. albicans Strain Deficient in Erg11p Are More Susceptible to Surfactin Treatment

Surfactin (SU), like other lipopeptides, can form channels in the cell membrane. Formation of these channels constitutes antibacterial activity [46]. Previous studies performed by our group have shown that SU did not kill C. albicans strains at the concentrations used [15]. Recently, it was observed that a C. albicans KS028 mutant with a deletion in ERG11 is 128-fold more sensitive to SU than the parental strain CAF2-1 (Figure 1). C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) growth was inhibited when exposed to SU at 16 and 32 µg/mL by 64.5% and 93%, respectively (Figure 1). The viability of the C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ mutant was 50% and 80% lower than that of the C. albicans wild type strain CAF2-1 depending on the SU concentration (Figure 1).

3.2. Surfactin Acts in Synergy with Azole Compounds to Inhibit C. albicans Viability

A C. albicans mutant without the ability to synthesize ergosterol is a model example of azole-treated yeast cells. Fluconazole is one of the most commonly used azoles for treatment of infection. C. albicans, however, has developed a high drug resistance to fluconazole through multiple underlying mechanisms [47,48]. One alternative strategy for treating candidiasis is to treat with compounds that are synergistically active with azoles in combination with azole treatment [49,50,51]. In order to investigate whether SU is synergistically active against C. albicans in combination with azoles, we tested a combination of this lipopeptide with the triazole compounds, fluconazole and itraconazole. In addition, we tested SU in combination with the imidazoles ketoconazole, clotrimazole, and miconazole.
The concentration leading to ≥90% growth inhibition of triazoles alone was below the level of detection for the C. albicans CAF2-1 (wild type, WT) strain. This value was over 256 for fluconazole and 8 µg/mL for itraconazole. At a concentration of 16 µg/mL, SU reduced the value leading to ≥50% growth inhibition for fluconazole 4-fold. A concentration of 32 µg/mL SU reduced the ≥50% growth inhibition activity for fluconazole 4-fold and itraconazole 8-fold. Both concentrations of SU did not change the ≥50% growth inhibition activity of imidazoles (Table 1). The ≥90% growth inhibition concentration values of ketoconazole and clotrimazole were 512 and 32-fold lower, respectively, in the presence of SU. At the concentrations 16 and 32 µg/mL, SU lowered the concentration leading to ≥90% growth inhibition of miconazole 64 and 128-fold (Table 1).

3.3. Surfactin Permeabilized the Plasma Membrane of C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ Mutant and C. albicans WT Strain after Treatment with Fluconazole

Changes in the PM structure of C. albicans, caused by various external factors, lead to PM permeabilization, ion leakage and cell death [52]. Sterols are the most abundant membrane components that influence membrane properties like tensile properties, phase separation properties, or liquid-ordered phase properties of the membrane [53,54]. Dupont et al. [52] proved that Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with alterations in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway have permeabilized PMs. As a result, these cells were more sensitive to dehydration. We investigated whether this effect is due to reduction in the amount of ergosterol or the complete removal of ergosterol in C. albicans cells. We investigated which of these factors causes PM permeabilization and whether interaction with SU intensifies the process of PM permeabilization. We treated C. albicans WT and erg11Δ/Δ strains with 16 and 32 µg/mL of SU (Figure 2). Without SU treatment, the percent of permeabilized WT cells was less than 1%. A small increase in this percentage was observed after treatment with 1 µg/mL fluconazole. C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ cells not treated with SU were permeabilized in 4.8 ± 2.7%. The treatment with 16 and 32 µg/mL SU, respectively, resulted in 21.6 ± 1.9 and 28.8 ± 1.5% permeabilization of erg11Δ/Δ cells (Figure 2B). Treatment with SU and fluconazole increased the amount of permeabilized cells to 3.4 and 7.5%, depending on SU concentration (Figure 2B).

3.4. Ergosterol Depletion and Surfactin Treatment Cause Changes in Cell Shape and Local Accumulation of Chitin in the Cell Wall of C. albicans

Recently, Madhavan et al. [55] published results showing that fluconazole and voriconazole change the shape of Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa cells. Among other changes, these compounds cause dimples on the cell surface. We decided to check if changes in the amount of ergosterol in the C. albicans PM in combination with SU treatment lead to changes in cell shape. SEM images of C. albicans cells treated with fluconazole or SU, as well as depletion of ergosterol, revealed ultrastructural changes. C. albicans CAF2-1 cells with normal ergosterol levels are ovular with smooth surfaces. SU causes only a light wrinkled surface (Figure 3A, left panel). Fluconazole causes deformation of the cell surface and the formation of dimples which are deepened by SU treatment (Figure 3A, middle panel). The C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ mutant unable to produce ergosterol showed a similar shape as the cells treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole (Figure 3A, right panel). In addition to SEM images, confocal microscope images were acquired of cells in the mutant strain unable to produce ergosterol with chitin-stained calcofluor white (CFW) (Figure 3B). This image showed localized accumulation of chitin. Dimples in cell shape and chitin accumulation was observed in locations other than the scars of buds.
In C. albicans, inhibition of β-glucan by caspofungin results in a compensatory increase in chitin synthesis. This effect is a defensive mechanism that makes the fungus resistant to caspofungin [14,56]. We observed accumulation of chitin in the erg11Δ/Δ mutant, suggesting a possible C. albicans defense mechanism to compensate for the lack of ergosterol. We investigated whether treatment of the WT strain with fluconazole leads to changes in the distribution of chitin in the cell wall. In addition, we investigated whether treatment with SU enhances any observed effects. Cell wall staining with calcofluor white showed even distribution of chitin in C. albicans CAF 2-1 cells. Chitin distribution did not change after SU treatment (Figure 3C). The same effect was observed with 0.5 µg/mL fluconazole treatment (Figure 3C). During concurrent fluconazole and SU treatment of C. albicans CAF2-1, chitin accumulation was observed (Figure 3C). The same effect was observed in the mutant unable to produce ergosterol (Figure 3C).

3.5. Surfactin and Fluconazole Cause Unmasking of Chitin and β-glucan in the Cell Wall of C. albicans

Chitin and β-glucan are two key fungal cell wall pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) which are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed on the surfaces of innate immune cells [57,58]. The fungal cell wall is remodeled upon recognition of key host-derived environmental signals [59] or changes in carbon sources and pH [60,61]. Wheeler and Fink [62] found that β-glucan in the cell wall of C. albicans is unmasked by caspofungin. The results we have obtained indicate changes in the C. albicans cell wall are due to depletion or lack of ergosterol and enhancement of this effect by SU. As a result, we investigated whether there are changes in the masking of chitin and β-glucan under the above conditions.
In both the C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ mutant and the WT strain treated with fluconazole, we observed a higher level of chitin unmasking in the cell wall than in C. albicans CAF 2-1 was observed. It seems that the addition of SU did not change the fluorescence of strains in these three examples but under the influence of SU we observed that some of the cells are elongated. Caspofungin by disrupting the cell wall structure in the septes separating parental and daughter cells causes the elongation of cells and their separation is impossible [17]. We have probably the same effect with SU (Figure 4A–C panel I). In the WT strain, we did not observe β-glucan exposure after staining. Treatment with SU did not result in visible staining (Figure 4A panel II). Similarly, unmasking β-glucan was not observed after WT cells were treated with fluconazole (Figure 4B panel II). In contrast, treatment of the WT strain with both fluconazole and SU resulted in the exposure of β-glucan, as illustrated by a strong fluorescent signal from Fc-hDectin-1 (Figure 4B panel II). Lack of ergosterol in the erg11Δ/Δ mutant caused slight exposure of β-glucan (Figure 4C panel II). The addition of SU to C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ significantly enhanced this effect. A strong fluorescent signal of β-glucan with Fc-hDectin1 staining was observed (Figure 4C panel II).
We tested whether chitin and β-glucan are exposed after treatment with fluconazole and SU. These elements of the cell wall were stained with WGA-FITC (chitin) or FC-Dec1 (β-glucan) and the fluorescence intensity was quantified by flow cytometry. The addition of fluconazole to WT cells did not change the intensity of the fluorescent signal (Figure 5A,B—left and middle panel). The fluorescence of the erg11Δ/Δ mutant was significantly reduced (Figure 5A,B—right panel). The addition of fluconazole to the WT strain shifted the fluorescence to higher values for the chitin green fluorescence. Only a slight shift in β-glucan fluorescence was observed (Figure 5A,B—middle panel). The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) value indicates a 6.3-fold increase for chitin and stability for β-glucan (Figure 5C,D). Addition of fluconazole and SU to the WT strain shifted the green fluorescence of both to the right for chitin and β-glucan. MFI indicated an increase from 87 to 451.2 and 750.7 units for chitin. An increase from 17.7 to 126.5 and 95.6 units was observed for β-glucan depending on the concentration of SU (Figure 5A,B—left panel; Figure 5C,D). A similar but significantly enhanced effect of shifting green fluorescence to the right under the influence of SU was observed in the erg11Δ/Δ mutant (Figure 5A,B—middle and right panels). However, MFI values for chitin increased from 60.2 to 120.4 and 114.3 units depending on SU concentration. This effect was much smaller than the effect observed in the WT strain treated with fluconazole (Figure 5C,D). In contrast, MFI values for β-glucan increased from 3 to 1326 and 1470.9 at concentrations of 16 and 32 µg/mL SU, respectively (Figure 5C,D).

3.6. C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ Mutant Undergoes Increased Expression of Chitin and β-glucan Synthase Genes in Opposition to Surfactin Activity under these Conditions

Our results indicate an increased amount of chitin and β-glucan unmasking in the C. albicans cell wall. This occurs as a result of ergosterol depletion and/or SU treatment. These results prompted us to investigate the expression levels of genes encoding synthases of these cell wall elements. We investigated two genes encoding chitin synthases: CHS3 and CHS4. In addition we investigated three gene encoding β-glucan synthases: GSC1, GSL1 and KRE9. Chs3 and Chs4 proteins can propagate long chitin fibrils. CHS3p is also required for the formation of linkages between chitin and β-glucan. Previous studies have revealed that Chs3p is necessary for approximately 80% of chitin production in C. albicans. Studies have shown Chs4p is less involved in chitin formation, but it enhances the activity of Chs3 synthase [63]. We have observed that, in the C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ strain, CSH4 and CSH3 expression increased 7.8 and 74.8-fold, respectively (Figure 6A,B). Fluconazole treatment of the WT strain increased CSH4 expression 5.3-fold, but not CSH3 expression. In combination with SU, increased expression of CSH3 was observed at the level of 1.4-fold. CSH4 expression increased 2.2-fold (Figure 6A,B). SU exposure did not increase expression of the tested synthases in the WT strain. In the C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ strain, SU treatment resulted in a 1.9-fold decrease in CSH3 expression and a 1.2-fold increase in CSH4 expression (Figure 6A,B).
Chitin is covalently cross-linked with β(1,3)glucan and forms a primary scaffold that is responsible for structural integrity and cell wall shape [64]. In fungal cell walls, β-D-glucans are a (1→3)-linked glucose polymer with (1→6)-linked side chains [65]. Gsc1p and Gsl1p are putative subunits of the β-1,3-glucan synthase complex. The first enzyme acts as synthase, while the second acts as an activator [66]. GSC1 gene disruption leads to an up to 20% decrease in cell wall β-glucan. In addition, there exists a direct correlation between the amount of β-glucan content and the amount of GSC1 mRNA. These genes are targets for antifungal therapy, leading to inhibition of cell wall assembly factors [67,68]. C. albicans mutant with heterozygous disruption of the KRE9 gene has been previously described. This mutant exhibits reduced levels of β-1,6-glucan in the cell wall whereas homozygous disruption leads to its total depletion. Thus, it has been proven that the KRE9 gene encodes the enzyme responsible for β-glucan synthesis. The KRE9 gene is a homologue of the S. cerevisiae KRE9 gene which is involved in the synthesis of β-1,6-glucan molecules [69].
Our work has shown that, in a C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ mutant, the expression of genes encoding three tested β-glucan synthases (GSC1, GSL1 and KRE9) is increased 3-, 2.4- and 43.7-fold, respectively compared to the WT strain (Figure 6C–E). SU does not affect the expression of these genes in the WT strain. However, in the erg11Δ/Δ mutant, it lowers GSC1, GSL1 and KRE9 gene expression 3-, 1.5- and 4- fold, respectively (Figure 6C–E). Fluconazole increases KRE9 expression in a WT strain by 5.4-fold. In this case, SU does not affect gene expression (Figure 6E). The interaction of fluconazole and SU with WT cells caused increased expression of the GSC1 and GSL1 genes 1.7- and 2.5- fold respectively (Figure 6C,D).

3.7. Molecular Modeling Reveals that Surfactin Can Form Intermolecular Complexes with Chitin and β-glucan

Molecular dynamics studies were carried out using a classical force field for 1:1 SU-chitin and SU-β-glucan noncovalent complexes. The C14 SU from B. subtilis was considered as a model. First, the chitin complexes will be discussed. A model of chitin chain, linear hexamer of N-acetylglucosamine was found to bind to a part of the SU peptide loop (Figure 7A panel I). Three separate 100 ns runs of classical molecular dynamics were studied. These use the same initial structures, but diverse initial velocities and thermostats, resulting in a quick divergence of simulation trajectories. One of the simulations gave a continuously stable complex, while the remaining two complexes dissociated and bound again. These complexes were bound approximately half of the simulation time (Figure 7B panel I). This was determined using the time evolution of distance between the centers of mass of SU and chitin. The MD trajectory analysis shows that the SU peptide loop is somewhat rigid, while the aliphatic chain is conformationally labile. The chitin chain remains linear while the sugar residues oscillate around the chain axis.
A map of intermolecular contacts was prepared (Figure 7C panel I) to indicate the fraction of time that a given atom pair from SU and chitin were less than 4 Å apart. We assumed this 4 Å cutoff, which is larger than conventionally used limits of hydrogen bonding (3.0 to 3.2 Å), due to the dynamic nature of the complexes in addition to the limitations of classical force fields when reproducing noncovalent interactions. The panels I A,C of Figure 7 show that the interactions exist mostly between SU residues L3, V4, D5, L6 and the sugar units 5 and 6 in the hexameric chitin model. For each SU residue shown on the X axis of Panel C, the sequence of plotted atoms is: backbone (N, C, O) and side-chain (Cα, Cβ). The hydrogen atoms were omitted from the contact analysis. The interactions are dynamical, as they are being continually formed and broken. The most important contacts exist for about 80% of the simulation time.
Interestingly, as indicated in Panel I A of Figure 7, the contact atoms are located in the backbone, not the sidechains, of the SU peptide loop. This accounts for spatial proximity the hydroxyl functions of the middle part of the chitin chain and the carboxyl sidechains of the E1 or D5 residues. This potentially enables the formation of ester bonds between these groups. Such interaction involves covalent bonding of the two moieties, thus it is outside the scope of this molecular dynamics study. The results of the simulations of SU-β-glucan complex (Figure 7 II) revealed some important differences between the affinity of SU toward β-glucan and chitin. The SU-β-glucan complexes rarely dissociate. When dissociation is observed, it occurs for a much shorter period than the SU-chitin systems (Panel II B of Figure 7). They are stable for over 90% of the simulation time. This, however, does not mean that the intermolecular contacts are more stable. Panel II C of Figure 7 reveals that the most stable contacts persist for less than 40% of the simulation time. They are formed by the SU residues L2, L3, V4, D5, L6 and the sugar units 3 to 5 of the hexameric β-glucan model. The discrepancy between the overall better stability and loss of persistence of particular contacts within the SU-β-glucan complexes can be explained by their stronger dynamics. Contacts are constantly broken and re-established possibly changing the donor-acceptor pairs.

4. Discussion

C. albicans has developed several defense mechanisms to survive environmental stress produced by the host immune system as well as antifungal agents. The resistance of this fungus is most often facilitated by changes in the structure and functioning of the cell wall and the plasma membrane. Antifungal compounds currently used function to block membrane (azoles) or cell wall (echinocandins) functions separately. However, this tactic is becoming less and less effective [70,71]. The most commonly used azole drug is fluconazole and the most commonly used echinocandin drug is caspofungin. Caspofungin (lipopeptide) induces expression of several genes encoding cell wall’s proteins [72,73] and triggers cell wall salvage mechanisms [74]. Another lipopeptide known for its antibacterial properties, surfactin (SU), did not show significant activity against the viability of C. albicans in our previous studies [15]. In contrast, several other teams have shown SU activity against fungal plant pathogens. One of the effects of SU is change in the shape of the fungal cells, likely due to changes in the cell wall [75,76,77].
Unexpectedly, we have observed high sensitivity to SU in an ergosterol-deficient C. albicans mutant (erg11Δ/Δ) (Figure 1). Combinations of triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole) with SU significantly reduced the value of concentration leading to ≥50 and ≥90% growth inhibition for C. albicans CAF2-1 strain (WT). Combinations of imidazoles with SU lowered ≥90% growth inhibition concentration values but did not give the above effect in case of ≥50% growth inhibition (Table 1). This data is especially promising taking into account previous reports on cytotoxic concentrations of SU towards human and animal cell lines [78,79]. They were in a range of 38–80 µg/mL, which is below the SU concentrations used in combinations with azoles against C. albicans (Table 1). Triazoles and imidazoles block cytochrome P450 isozymes with different selectivities [80,81]. These drugs affect ergosterol synthesis, lipid composition and the function of cell membranes with varying intensity [82]. Azole also affects the activity of chitin synthases, resulting in an irregular distribution of chitin in the cell wall [83]. Our results suggest that lack of ergosterol, or total depletion by blocking its synthesis pathway by triazoles, causes adequate changes in the cell wall. The cell wall then becomes susceptible to the influence of SU. The above hypothesis has been confirmed by intensive membrane permeabilization in the erg11Δ/Δ mutant under the influence of SU and in C. albicans WT in the presence of fluconazole and SU (Figure 2).
Dupont et al. [52] proved that the composition of sterols in the plasma membrane governs its mechanical behavior. Dupont’s team showed increased susceptibility to the osmotic fluctuation of a yeast S. cerevisiae mutant with impaired ergosterol synthesis. The hypersensitivity of the mutant was linked to cell volume variation and PM permeabilization. Moreover, ergosterol supplementation significantly increased mutant survival and resistance to osmotic shock [52]. In our investigations, a C. albicans erg11Δ/Δ mutant and the C. albicans WT strain show cell deformation after fluconazole treatment. We observed dimples in the cells were clearly deepened due to the action of SU (Figure 3A). We also found localized accumulation of chitin in the cell wall of C. albicans lacking ergosterol and in a C. albicans WT strain treated with fluconazole. We did not observe an increase in the accumulation of chitin in the cells treated with fluconazole and SU. This was in contrast to the cells of a mutant without ergosterol after adding SU (Figure 3C). These results correlate with our studies on the expression of genes encoding selected chitin synthases. We did not observe increased expression of these genes under the influence of SU (Figure 6A,B). These results suggest a different mechanism of SU antifungal activity compared to caspofungin.
The cell wall polysaccharides β-glucan and chitin are responsible for structural integrity and shape of the cell wall. β-glucan is linked with mannoproteins that form the outermost layer of the cell wall and these two elements of the cell wall are mainly responsible for host-pathogen interactions [19,64]. β-glucan is an essential cell wall component targeted by fungicidal antibodies and immune receptors. Dectin-1, the β-glucan receptor, also recognizes fungi and mediates the immune system’s proinflammatory response [84,85]. β-glucan must be unmasked by the removal of mannoproteins in order to activate the immune system. Thus, C. albicans often hide from the immune system’s pro-inflammatory response by masking β-glucan [62]. For these reasons, it is essential to treat with drugs that expose β-glucan to the immune system. Wheeler and Fink [62] showed that caspofungin in subinhibitory concentrations exposes the normally-masked β-glucan. This is an additional activity of this drug, as it also blocks chitin synthesis [86]. Caspofungin is thus a dual-action antifungal drug. C. albicans cells defend against caspofungin by stimulating chitin synthesis [87].
When the microscopic observations in this study are taken into consideration, the effect of unmasking β-glucan in the WT strain through the use of SU and fluconazole is observed (Figure 4 p. II B). It seems that the combination of these compounds did not increase chitin unmasking by fluconazole (Figure 4 p. I B). When the erg11Δ/Δ mutant is treated with SU we did not observe an increase in chitin unmasking (Figure 4 p. I C). This observation was in contrast to intensive β-glucan unmasking (Figure 4 p. II C). The above observations, in most cases, were confirmed by the quantitative results from FACS studies (Figure 5). Also, we observed that when fluconazole and SU were used, the amount of unmasked chitin measured by MFI increased in the range 6- to 8-fold depending on the SU concentration (Figure 5C). This result suggests that SU participates in chitin unmasking.
SU treatment caused an erg11Δ/Δ mutant to reduce expression of the CHS3 gene which is estimated to account for 80% of chitin production in the cell wall [63]. SU treatment also lowered expression of genes encoding β-glucan (Figure 6). Based on these results, it seems that only very low or absent ergosterol induces a reaction involving the accumulation of chitin. SU does not enhance chitin accumulation. When there is a complete lack of ergosterol in the cell, SU inhibited chitin and β-glucan synthesis. SU treatment also exposed both components of the cell wall to the immune system. To clarify whether SU can bind to β-glucan and chitin, we conducted in silico investigations. Coupling studies showed that the overall stability of the complexes is higher for SU-β-glucan. We tentatively assigned these interactions as stronger than the SU-chitin noncovalent complexes. Interestingly, we observed that the protein-polysaccharide contacts were formed by the protein loop of SU while the hydrophobic aliphatic chain remains free (Figure 7).
In this work, we showed the potential use of SU as an antifungal drug with a different mechanism of action than another lipopeptide, caspofungin. Although the combination of caspofungin with azoles demonstrated in vitro activity against pathogenic fungi, clinical studies provided uncertain data whether this combination was active in vivo [88]. This indicates that the next stage of our research should be testing the effect of SU on animal infection models. Such research would be especially promising because numerous reports are currently available concerning low cytotoxic properties of SU in vitro [78,79]. According to our results, SU binds to β-glucan and binds with a weaker affinity to chitin, revealing these elements of the C. albicans cell wall to the immune system. In order to unmask these elements, changes in the plasma membrane are necessary. These changes require a reduced amount or lack of ergosterol. Hence, the presence of fluconazole, which depletes or removes ergosterol, is beneficial. The cell resists killing by SU by reducing the expression of chitin-encoding genes. This is a reversible process that protects against azoles.

5. Conclusions

Candida albicans is an opportunistic pathogen that resides in the human microflora. Systemic C. albicans infections are often fatal in immunocompromised individuals. New antifungal therapeutics are needed due to a limited number of effective treatment compounds. Biosurfactants like lipopeptides are promising therapeutic compounds with diverse biological activities. Surfactins are lipopeptide biosurfactants consisting of a seven amino acid peptide loop attached to a hydrophobic fatty acid.
This study shows that surfactin enhances the antifungal activity of fluconazole. Fluconazole lowers the ergosterol concentration in the plasma membrane, thereby modifying the structure of the cell wall. Fluconazole enables surfactin to expose β-glucan to the host immune system. Surfactin can form complexes with β-glucan and chitin, leading to complex accumulation and further cell wall and plasma membrane modification. Modulating interactions between the plasma membrane and the cell wall in pathogenic fungi is a viable potential antifungal strategy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K., J.J.P., A.J.; methodology, A.K., J.S., D.D., J.M., J.J.P., A.J.; software, J.S., J.J.P., A.J.; validation, J.S., D.D., J.M., J.J.P., A.J.; formal analysis, J.S., D.D., J.M., J.J.P., A.J., M.Ł., A.K. investigation, J.S., D.D., J.M., J.J.P., A.J.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K., M.Ł., JS., J.J.P., A.J.; visualization, J.S., D.D., J.M., J.J.P., A.J.; supervision, A.K.; funding acquisition, A.K., J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, NCN Grants: 2016/23/B/NZ1/01928, 2017/25/N/NZ1/00050.

Acknowledgments

C. albicans CAF2-1 strain was a kind gifts from D. Sanglard (Lausanne, Switzerland). Surfactin (SU; purity >90%) was a kind gift from InventionBio (Bydgoszcz, Poland).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zaoutis, T.E.; Argon, J.; Chu, J.; Berlin, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; Feudtner, C. The epidemiology and attributable outcomes of candidemia in adults and children hospitalized in the United States: A propensity analysis. Clin. Infect Dis. 2005, 41, 1232–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Charlet, R.; Pruvost, Y.; Tumba, G.; Istel, F.; Poulain, D.; Kuchler, K.; Sendid, B.; Jawhara, S. Remodeling of the Candida glabrata cell wall in the gastrointestinal tract affects the gut microbiota and the immune response. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, T.; Wagner, A.S.; Tams, R.N.; Eyer, J.E.; Kauffman, S.J.; Gann, E.R.; Fernandez, E.J.; Reynolds, T.B. Lrg1 regulates β (1,3)-glucan masking in Candida albicans through the Cek1 MAP kinase pathway. mBio 2019, 10, e01767-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Woolley, W. Some biological effects produced by benzimidazole and their reversal by purines. J. Biol. Chem. 1944, 152, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gubbins, P.O.; Anaissie, J.E. Clinical Mycology, 2nd ed.; Churchill Livingstone: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sanglard, D.; Ischer, F.; Parkinson, T.; Falconer, D.; Bille, J. Candida albicans mutations in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway and resistance to several antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2404–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Prasad, R.; Shah, A.H.; Rawal, M.K. Antifungals: Mechanism of action and drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 892, 327–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sanglard, D.; Coste, A.; Ferrari, S. Antifungal drug resistance mechanisms in fungal pathogens from the perspective of transcriptional gene regulation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 1029–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vandeputte, P.; Ferrari, S.; Coste, A.T. Antifungal resistance and new strategies to control fungal infections. Int. J. Microbiol. 2012, 2012, 713687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Perlin, D.S. Current perspectives on echinocandin class drugs. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shapiro, R.S.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance, and disease. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 213–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gow, N.A.; Hube, B. Importance of the Candida albicans cell wall during commensalism and infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gow, N.A.; van de Veerdonk, F.; Brown, A.; Netea, M.G. Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: Discriminating invasion from colonization. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cortés, J.C.G.; Curto, M.G.; Carvalho, V.S.D.; Pérez, P.; Ribas, J.C. The fungal cell wall as a target for the development of new antifungal therapies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Biniarz, P.; Baranowska, G.; Feder-Kubis, J.; Krasowska, A. The lipopeptide pseudofactin II effectively decreased Candida albicans adhesion and hydrophobicity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Milewski, S.; Mignini, F.; Borowski, E. Synergistic action of nikkomycin X/Z with azole antifungals on Candida albicans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1991, 137, 2155–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Walker, L.A.; Munro, C.A.; de Brujin, I.; Lenardon, M.D.; McKinnon, A.; Gow, N.A. Stimulation of chitin synthesis rescues Candida albicans from echinocandins. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. McKenzie, C.G.J.; Koser, U.; Lewis, L.E.; Bain, J.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Barker, R.N.; Gow, N.A.R.; Erwig, L.P. Contribution of Candida albicans cell wall components to recognition by and escape from murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 1650–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gow, N.A.R.; Netea, M.G.; Munro, C.A.; Ferwerda, G.; Bates, S.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Walker, L.; Jansen, T.; Jacobs, L.; Tsoni, V.; et al. Immune recognition of Candida albicans beta-glucan by dectin-1. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 1565–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Netea, M.G.; Brown, G.D.; Kullberg, B.J.; Gow, N.A.R. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, J.; Ren, B.; Tong, Y.; Dai, H.; Zhang, L. Synergistic combinations of antifungals and anti-virulence agents to fight against Candida albicans. Virulence 2015, 6, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Biniarz, P.; Łukaszewicz, M.; Janek, T. Screening concepts, characterization and structural analysis of microbial-derived bioactive lipopeptides: A review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Janek, T.; Krasowska, A.; Radwańska, A.; Łukaszewicz, M. Lipopeptide biosurfactant pseudofactin II induced apoptosis of melanoma a 375 cells by specific interaction with the plasma membrane. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Janek, T.; Lukaszewicz, M.; Rezanka, T.; Krasowska, A. Isolation and characterization of two new lipopeptide biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens BD5 isolated from water from the Arctic Archipelago of Svalbard. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6118–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ceresa, C.; Rinaldi, M.; Chiono, V.; Carmagnola, I.; Allegrone, G.; Fracchia, L. Lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis AC7 inhibit adhesion and biofilm formation of Candida albicans on silicone. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2016, 109, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jajor, P.; Piłakowska-Pietras, D.; Krasowska, A.; Łukaszewicz, M. Surfactin analogues produced by Bacillus subtilis strains grown on rapeseed cake. J. Mol. Struct. 2016, 1126, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fonzi, W.A.; Irwin, M.Y. Isogenic strain construction and gene mapping in Candida albicans. Genetics 1993, 134, 717–728. [Google Scholar]
  28. Suchodolski, J.; Muraszko, J.; Bernat, P.; Krasowska, A. Crucial role of ergosterol in plasma membrane composition, localisation and activity of Cdr1p and H+-ATPase in Candida albicans. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Ed.) Reference Method for Broth Dilutionantifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeast, Approved Standard. M27-A3 28, 3rd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  30. Suchodolski, J.; Feder-Kubis, J.; Krasowska, A. Antifungal activity of ionic liquids based on (−)-menthol: A mechanism study. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 197, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De Almeida, R.F.M.; Santos, F.C.; Marycz, K.; Alicka, M.; Krasowska, A.; Suchodolski, J.; Panek, J.J.; Jezierska, A.; Starosta, R. New diphenylphosphane derivatives of ketoconazole are promising antifungal agents. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Suchodolski, J.; Krasowska, A. Plasma membrane potential of Candida albicans measured by Di-4-ANEPPS fluorescence depends on growth phase and regulatory factors. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Piętka-Ottlik, M.; Lewińska, A.; Jaromin, A.; Krasowska, A.; Wilk, K.A. Antifungal organoselenium compound loaded nanoemulsions stabilized by bifunctional cationic surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 510, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Malavia, D.; Lehtovirta-Morley, L.E.; Alamir, O.; Weiβ, E.; Gow, N.A.; Hube, B.; Wilson, D. Zinc limitation induces a hyper-adherent Goliath phenotype in Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wagener, J.; MacCallum, D.M.; Brown, G.D.; Gow, N.A. Candida albicans chitin increases arginase-1 activity in human macrophages, with an impact on macrophage antimicrobial functions. mBio 2017, 8, e01820-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Szczepaniak, J.; Łukaszewicz, M.; Krasowska, A. Estimation of Candida albicans ABC transporter behavior in real-time via fluorescence. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Tsan, P.; Volpon, L.; Besson, F.; Lancelin, J.M. Structure and dynamics of surfactin studied by NMR in micellar media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1968–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Schaftenaar, G.; Noordik, J.H. Molden: A pre- and post-processing program for molecular and electronic structures. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Case, D.A.; Berryman, J.T.; Betz, R.M.; Cerutti, D.S.; Cheatham, T.E., III; Darden, T.A.; Duke, R.E.; Giese, T.J.; Gohlke, H.; Goetz, A.W.; et al. AMBER 2015 Reference Manual; University of California: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, J.; Wolf, R.; Caldwell, J.; Kollman, P.; Case, D. Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jakalian, A.; Jack, D.B.; Bayly, C.I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1623–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jorgensen, W.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J.; Klein, M. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089–10092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Andersen, H.C. Molecular dynamics at constant pressure and/or temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 2384–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD—Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Molec. Graph. 1996, 4, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pueyo, M.T.; Bloch, C.; Carmona-Ribeiro, A.M.; di Mascio, P. Lipopeptides produced by a soil Bacillus megaterium strain. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 57, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Wu, Y.; Gao, N.; Li, C.; Gao, J.; Ying, C. A newly identified amino acid substitution T123I in the 14α-demethylase (Erg11p) of Candida albicans confers azole resistance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, fox012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cannon, R.D.; Lamping, E.; Holmes, A.R.; Niimi, K.; Baret, P.V.; Keniya, M.V.; Tanabe, K.; Niimi, M.; Goffeau, A.; Monk, B.C. Efflux-mediated antifungal drug resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Quan, H.; Cao, Y.Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, J.X.; Gao, P.H.; Qin, X.F.; Jiang, Y.Y. Potent in vitro synergism of fluconazole and berberine chloride against clinical isolates of Candida albicans resistant to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Li, L.; Zhang, T.; Xu, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, W.; Yan, L.; An, M.; et al. The synergism of the small molecule ENOblock and fluconazole against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhao, Y.J.; Liu, W.D.; Shen, Y.N.; Li, D.M.; Zhu, K.J.; Zhang, H. The efflux pump inhibitor tetrandrine exhibits synergism with fluconazole or voriconazole against Candida parapsilosis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 5867–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dupont, S.; Beney, L.; Ferreira, T.; Gervais, P. Nature of sterols affects plasma membrane behavior and yeast survival during dehydration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808, 1520–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hsueh, Y.W.; Chen, M.T.; Patty, P.J.; Code, C.; Cheng, J.; Frisken, B.J.; Zuckermann, M.; Thewalt, J. Ergosterol in POPC membranes: Physical properties and comparison with structurally similar sterols. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 1606–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Bacia, K.; Schwille, P.; Kurzchalia, T. Sterol structure determines the separation of phases and the curvature of the liquid-ordered phase in model membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 3272–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Madhavan, P.; Jamal, F.; Pei, C.P.; Othman, F.; Karunanidhi, A.; Ng, K.P. Comparative study of the effects of fluconazole and voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa biofilms. Mycopathologia 2018, 183, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, K.K.; Maccallum, D.M.; Jacobsen, M.D.; Walker, L.A.; Odds, F.C.; Gow, N.A.; Munro, C.A. Elevated cell wall chitin in Candida albicans confers echinocandin resistance in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Bourgeois, C.; Majer, O.; Frohner, I.E.; Tierney, L.; Kuchler, K. Fungal attacks on mammalian hosts: Pathogen elimination requires sensing and tasting. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cottier, F.; Sherrington, S.; Cockerill, S.; Del Olmo Toledo, V.; Kissane, S.; Tournu, H.; Orsini, L.; Palmer, G.E.; Pérez, J.C.; Hall, R.A. Remasking of Candida albicans β-Glucan in response to environmental pH is regulated by quorum sensing. mBio 2019, 10, e02347-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Hall, R.A. Dressed to impress: Impact of environmental adaptation on the Candida albicans cell wall. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 97, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Ballou, E.R.; Avelar, G.M.; Childers, D.S.; Mackie, J.; Bain, J.M.; Wagener, J.; Kastora, S.L.; Panea, M.D.; Hardison, S.E.; Walker, L.A.; et al. Lactate signalling regulates fungal-glucan masking and immune evasion. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sherrington, S.L.; Sorsby, E.; Mahtey, N.; Kumwenda, P.; Lenardon, M.D.; Brown, I.; Ballou, E.R.; MacCallum, D.M.; Hall, R.A. Adaptation of Candida albicans to environmental pH induces cell wall remodelling and enhances innate immune recognition. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wheeler, R.T.; Fink, G.R. A drug-sensitive genetic network masks fungi from the immune system. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sudoh, M.; Tatsuno, K.; Ono, N.; Ohta, A.; Chibana, H.; Yamada-Okabe, H.; Arisawa, M. The Candida albicans CHS4 gene complements a Saccharomyces cerevisiae skt5/chs4 mutation and is involved in chitin biosynthesis. Microbiology 1999, 145, 1613–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Klis, F.M.; de Groot, P.; Hellingwerf, K. Molecular organisation of the cell wall of Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 2001, 39, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Borchani, C.; Fonteyn, F.; Jamin, G.; Destain, J.; Willems, L.; Paquot, M.; Blecker, C.; Thonart, P. Structural characterization, technological functionality, and physiological aspects of fungal β-D-glucans: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1746–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Salci, T.P.; Negri, M.; Abadio, A.K.R.; Svidzinski, T.I.E.; Kioshima, É.S. Targeting Candida spp. to develop antifungal agents. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 802–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mio, T.; Adachi-Shimizu, M.; Tachibana, Y.; Tabuchi, H.; Inoue, S.B.; Yabe, T.; Yamada-Okabe, T.; Arisawa, M.; Watanabe, T.; Yamada-Okabe, H. Cloning of the Candida albicans homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae GSC1/FKS1 and its involvement in beta-1, 3-glucan synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 4096–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Niimi, K.; Monk, B.C.; Hirai, A.; Hatakenaka, K.; Umeyama, T.; Lamping, E.; Maki, K.; Tanabe, K.; Kamimura, T.; Ikeda, F.; et al. Clinically significant micafungin resistance in Candida albicans involves modification of a glucan synthase catalytic subunit GSC1 (FKS1) allele followed by loss of heterozygosity. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 842–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lussier, M.; Sdicu, A.M.; Shahinian, S.; Bussey, H. The Candida albicans KRE9 gene is required for cell wall β-1, 6-glucan synthesis and is essential for growth on glucose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 9825–9830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nishimoto, A.T.; Sharma, C.; Rogers, P.D. Molecular and genetic basis of azole antifungal resistance in the opportunistic pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 75, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Prasad, R.; Nair, R.; Banerjee, A. Multidrug transporters of Candida species in clinical azole resistance. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019, 132, 103252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bruno, V.M.; Kalachikov, S.; Subaran, R.; Nobile, C.J.; Kyratsous, C.; Mitchell, A.P. Control of the C. albicans cell wall damage response by transcriptional regulator Cas5. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Liu, T.T.; Lee, R.E.; Barker, K.S.; Lee, R.E.; Wei, L.; Homayouni, R.; Rogers, P.D. Genome-wide expression profiling of the response to azole, polyene, echinocandin, and pyrimidine antifungal agents in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2226–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Plaine, A.; Walker, L.; Da Costa, G.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; McKinnon, A.; Gow, N.A.R.; Gaillardin, C.; Munro, C.A.; Richarda, M.L. Functional analysis of Candida albicans GPI-anchored proteins: Roles in cell wall integrity and caspofungin sensitivity. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1404–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Toral, L.; Rodríguez, M.; Béjar, V.; Sampedro, I. Antifungal activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus XT1 CECT 8661 against Botrytis cinerea. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fira, D.; Dimkić, I.; Berić, T.; Lozo, J.; Stanković, S. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 285, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wu, S.; Liu, G.; Zhou, S.; Sha, Z.; Sun, C. Characterization of antifungal lipopeptide biosurfactants produced by marine bacterium Bacillus sp. CS30. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Dong, B.; Ma, X.; Hou, L.; Cao, X.; Wang, C. Anti-inflammatory activity and mechanism of surfactin in lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages. Inflammation 2015, 38, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vollenbroich, D.; Ozel, M.; Vater, J.; Kamp, R.M.; Pauli, G. Mechanism of inactivation of enveloped viruses by the biosurfactant surfactin from Bacillus subtilis. Biologicals 1997, 25, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bossche, H.V.; Marichal, P.; Gorrens, J.; Bellens, D.; Verhoeven, H.; Coene, M.C.; Lauwers, W.; Janssen, P.A.J. Interaction of azole derivatives with cytochrome P-450 isozymes in yeast, fungi, plants and mammalian cells. Pestic. Sci. 1987, 21, 289–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hargrove, T.Y.; Friggeri, L.; Wawrzak, Z.; Qi, A.; Hoekstra, W.J.; Schotzinger, R.J.; York, J.D.; Guengerich, F.P.; Lepesheva, G.I. Structural analyses of Candida albicans sterol 14 α-demethylase complexed with azole drugs address the molecular basis of azole-mediated inhibition of fungal sterol biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 6728–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Hitchcock, C.A. Cytochrome P-450-dependent 14α-sterol demethylase of Candida albicans and its interaction with azole antifungals. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1991, 19, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bossche, H.V. Biochemical targets for antifungal azole derivatives: Hypothesis on the mode of action. Curr. Top. Med. Mycol. 1985, 1, 313–351. [Google Scholar]
  84. Torosantucci, A.; Bromuro, C.; Chiani, P.; De Bernardis, F.; Berti, F.; Galli, C.; Norelli, F.; Bellucci, C.; Polonelli, L.; Costantino, P.; et al. A novel glyco-conjugate vaccine against fungal pathogens. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Brown, G.D.; Gordon, S. Immune recognition of fungal beta-glucans. Cell. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Denning, D.W. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 2003, 362, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Munro, C.A.; Selvaggini, S.; de Bruijn, I.; Walker, L.; Lenardon, M.D.; Gerssen, B.; Milne, S.; Brown, A.J.; Gow, N.A. The PKC, HOG and Ca2+ signalling pathways co-ordinately regulate chitin synthesis in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Campitelli, M.; Zeineddine, N.; Samaha, G.; Maslak, S. Combination Antifungal Therapy: A Review of Current Data. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2017, 9, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g001 550
Figure 1. The percent viability of C. albicans CAF2-1 (wild type, WT) and KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains after 24 h growth in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) in the presence of surfactin (SU) (0–4096 µg/mL). Concentrations of surfactin (SU, µg/mL), leading to either ≥50 or ≥90% growth inhibition towards C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) and KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains were indicated by dashed lines and were equal to 2048 and 16 (≥50% inhibition) for WT or erg11Δ/Δ, respectively and 4096 and 32 (≥90% inhibition) for WT or erg11Δ/Δ, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed by comparing viability of the erg11Δ/Δ strain to the viability of the WT strain in correspondence with SU concentrations (means ±SD, n = 6) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Figure 1. The percent viability of C. albicans CAF2-1 (wild type, WT) and KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains after 24 h growth in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) in the presence of surfactin (SU) (0–4096 µg/mL). Concentrations of surfactin (SU, µg/mL), leading to either ≥50 or ≥90% growth inhibition towards C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) and KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains were indicated by dashed lines and were equal to 2048 and 16 (≥50% inhibition) for WT or erg11Δ/Δ, respectively and 4096 and 32 (≥90% inhibition) for WT or erg11Δ/Δ, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed by comparing viability of the erg11Δ/Δ strain to the viability of the WT strain in correspondence with SU concentrations (means ±SD, n = 6) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g001
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g002 550
Figure 2. C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strains were grown in the presence of 1 µg/mL fluconazole pretreatment (WT + FLC). C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains were stained with propidium iodide (PI) after 2 h treatment with SU (0, 16 and 32 µg/mL). (A) Representative microscopic observations, scale bar = 20 µm; (B) Histograms of quantified % of permeabilized cells, means ± SD (n = 3), statistical analysis at each concentration was performed relative to control experiments without SU treatment (above bars) or between WT and WT + FLC or WT and erg11∆/∆ strains (above lines) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Figure 2. C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strains were grown in the presence of 1 µg/mL fluconazole pretreatment (WT + FLC). C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains were stained with propidium iodide (PI) after 2 h treatment with SU (0, 16 and 32 µg/mL). (A) Representative microscopic observations, scale bar = 20 µm; (B) Histograms of quantified % of permeabilized cells, means ± SD (n = 3), statistical analysis at each concentration was performed relative to control experiments without SU treatment (above bars) or between WT and WT + FLC or WT and erg11∆/∆ strains (above lines) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g002
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) and KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains. ((A)—upper panel) images of C. albicans cells untreated (control) or treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole. ((A)—lower panel) images of C. albicans cells treated with 32 µg/mL SU, (B) Confocal microscope z-stack projection showing C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) chitin staining by calcofluor white dye (CFW); 1—surface dimples, 2—septa, 3—localized chitin accumulations. Scale bars in all images are equal to 2.5 µm. (C) C. albicans chitin was stained with calcofluor white (CFW) in C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) untreated and treated with 16 or 32 µg/mL SU. The C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strain was simultaneously treated with 0.5 µg/mL fluconazole and 16 or 32 µg/mL SU. C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) was also treated under the same conditions. Images are representative of at least three independent experiments. Scale bars are equal to 2 µm.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) and KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains. ((A)—upper panel) images of C. albicans cells untreated (control) or treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole. ((A)—lower panel) images of C. albicans cells treated with 32 µg/mL SU, (B) Confocal microscope z-stack projection showing C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) chitin staining by calcofluor white dye (CFW); 1—surface dimples, 2—septa, 3—localized chitin accumulations. Scale bars in all images are equal to 2.5 µm. (C) C. albicans chitin was stained with calcofluor white (CFW) in C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) untreated and treated with 16 or 32 µg/mL SU. The C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strain was simultaneously treated with 0.5 µg/mL fluconazole and 16 or 32 µg/mL SU. C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) was also treated under the same conditions. Images are representative of at least three independent experiments. Scale bars are equal to 2 µm.
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g003
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g004 550
Figure 4. Unmasking chitin was detected by chitin staining with wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (WGA-FITC) (panel (I)). Unmasking β-glucan was detected by β-glucan staining with Fc-hDectin-1 (FC-Dec1) and Alexa Fluor 448-conjugated anti-human IgG Fc antibodies (panel (II)) in C. albicans treated with 16 or 32 µg/mL SU. (A) C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strain; (B) C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strain simultaneously treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole and (C) C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) mutant. Images are representative of at least three independent experiments. Scale bars are equal to 2.5 µm.
Figure 4. Unmasking chitin was detected by chitin staining with wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (WGA-FITC) (panel (I)). Unmasking β-glucan was detected by β-glucan staining with Fc-hDectin-1 (FC-Dec1) and Alexa Fluor 448-conjugated anti-human IgG Fc antibodies (panel (II)) in C. albicans treated with 16 or 32 µg/mL SU. (A) C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strain; (B) C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) strain simultaneously treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole and (C) C. albicans KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) mutant. Images are representative of at least three independent experiments. Scale bars are equal to 2.5 µm.
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g004
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g005 550
Figure 5. Exposure of (A,C) chitin and (B,D) β-glucan in C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) or KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains grown for 24h in YPD without and the addition of 16 or 32 µg/mL surfactin (0 SU, yellow; 16 SU, green and 32 SU, blue). The CAF2-1 strain was simultaneously treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole (FLC) and SU. In each case, cells were fixed and stained with Fc-hDectin-1 and Alexa Fluor 448-conjugated anti-human IgG Fc antibodies or wheat germ agglutinin conjugated with FITC (WGA-FITC) and quantified by FACS (A,B). All results were compared to unstained CAF2-1 or KS028 cells (autofluorescence, red). Presented data are representative of three independent experiments. Median fluorescence intensities (MFIs) (C,D) were quantified for all three experiments. Autofluorescence of either CAF2-1 or KS028 unstained cells was subtracted. Statistical analyses were performed relative to control experiments using CAF2-1 untreated with SU (above bars) or in the case of WT + FLC and erg11∆/∆ additionally between SU-treated cells (16SU or 32SU) or SU-nontreated (0SU) (above lines) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Figure 5. Exposure of (A,C) chitin and (B,D) β-glucan in C. albicans CAF2-1 (WT) or KS028 (erg11Δ/Δ) strains grown for 24h in YPD without and the addition of 16 or 32 µg/mL surfactin (0 SU, yellow; 16 SU, green and 32 SU, blue). The CAF2-1 strain was simultaneously treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole (FLC) and SU. In each case, cells were fixed and stained with Fc-hDectin-1 and Alexa Fluor 448-conjugated anti-human IgG Fc antibodies or wheat germ agglutinin conjugated with FITC (WGA-FITC) and quantified by FACS (A,B). All results were compared to unstained CAF2-1 or KS028 cells (autofluorescence, red). Presented data are representative of three independent experiments. Median fluorescence intensities (MFIs) (C,D) were quantified for all three experiments. Autofluorescence of either CAF2-1 or KS028 unstained cells was subtracted. Statistical analyses were performed relative to control experiments using CAF2-1 untreated with SU (above bars) or in the case of WT + FLC and erg11∆/∆ additionally between SU-treated cells (16SU or 32SU) or SU-nontreated (0SU) (above lines) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g005
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g006 550
Figure 6. Relative CHS3 (A), CHS4 (B), GSC1 (C), GSL1 (D) or KRE9 (E) gene expression in C. albicans treated with 32 µg/mL SU. The following cell types were treated under the following conditions: C. albicans CAF2-1 strain (WT), C. albicans CAF2-1 strain simultaneously treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole (WT + FLC) and C. albicans KS028 strain (erg11Δ/Δ mutant). Gene expression levels are reported as means of 2−∆∆CT values (n = 6) ± SD; normalized to 1 for untreated CAF2-1 strain (WT 0SU). Statistical analyses were performed by comparing expression under each condition to a untreated CAF2-1 strain (WT 0SU) (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
Figure 6. Relative CHS3 (A), CHS4 (B), GSC1 (C), GSL1 (D) or KRE9 (E) gene expression in C. albicans treated with 32 µg/mL SU. The following cell types were treated under the following conditions: C. albicans CAF2-1 strain (WT), C. albicans CAF2-1 strain simultaneously treated with 1 µg/mL fluconazole (WT + FLC) and C. albicans KS028 strain (erg11Δ/Δ mutant). Gene expression levels are reported as means of 2−∆∆CT values (n = 6) ± SD; normalized to 1 for untreated CAF2-1 strain (WT 0SU). Statistical analyses were performed by comparing expression under each condition to a untreated CAF2-1 strain (WT 0SU) (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g006
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g007 550
Figure 7. Molecular dynamic studies show that surfactin (SU) is able to form intermolecular complexes with chitin (I) and β-glucan (II). (A) Exemplary snapshots of the molecular dynamics runs; the atoms forming most stable close intermolecular contacts (<4 Å) are indicated by transparent spheres (green for the saccharide, yellow for SU). Color coding for atoms: cyan—carbon, blue—nitrogen, red—oxygen, while hydrogen atoms are not shown for clarity. Hydrogen bonds present in the snapshots are indicated by dotted lines. (B) Time evolution of distance between centers of mass of SU and the saccharide in three separate simulation runs. (C) Map of interatomic contacts between SU and the saccharide—the pixel color indicates the fraction of simulation time during which a particular interatomic contact existed.
Figure 7. Molecular dynamic studies show that surfactin (SU) is able to form intermolecular complexes with chitin (I) and β-glucan (II). (A) Exemplary snapshots of the molecular dynamics runs; the atoms forming most stable close intermolecular contacts (<4 Å) are indicated by transparent spheres (green for the saccharide, yellow for SU). Color coding for atoms: cyan—carbon, blue—nitrogen, red—oxygen, while hydrogen atoms are not shown for clarity. Hydrogen bonds present in the snapshots are indicated by dotted lines. (B) Time evolution of distance between centers of mass of SU and the saccharide in three separate simulation runs. (C) Map of interatomic contacts between SU and the saccharide—the pixel color indicates the fraction of simulation time during which a particular interatomic contact existed.
Pharmaceutics 12 00314 g007
Table
Table 1. Concentrations (µg/mL) of triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazle) or imidazoles (ketoconazole, clotrimazol, miconazole) leading to either ≥ 50 or ≥ 90% growth inhibition (g.i.) of C. albicans CAF2-1 strain. These values were given alone or in combination with surfactin (SU) (µg/mL) towards C. albicans CAF2-1 strain. Fractional inhibitory concentration indexes (FICIs) were included in bracelets.
Table 1. Concentrations (µg/mL) of triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazle) or imidazoles (ketoconazole, clotrimazol, miconazole) leading to either ≥ 50 or ≥ 90% growth inhibition (g.i.) of C. albicans CAF2-1 strain. These values were given alone or in combination with surfactin (SU) (µg/mL) towards C. albicans CAF2-1 strain. Fractional inhibitory concentration indexes (FICIs) were included in bracelets.
Azole≥50% g.i.≥50% g.i.≥50% g.i.≥90% g.i.≥90% g.i.≥90% g.i.
16 µg/mL SU32 µg/mL SU16 µg/mL SU32 µg/mL SU
Triazoles
Fluconazole20.50.5>25610.5
(FICI = 0.258)(FICI = 0.258)(FICI < 0.012)(FICI < 0.010)
Itraconazole0.03130.00780.0039>80.01560.0078
(FICI = 0.257)(FICI = 0.132)(FICI < 0.010)(FICI < 0.009)
Imidazoles
Ketoconazole0.00390.00390.003940.00780.0078
(FICI = 1.008)(FICI = 1.008)(FICI = 0.010)(FICI = 0.010)
Clotrimazole0.01560.01560.015610.03130.0313
(FICI = 1.008)(FICI = 1.008)(FICI = 0.039)(FICI = 0.039)
Miconazole0.01560.01560.015620.03130.0156
(FICI = 1.008)(FICI = 1.008)(FICI = 0.023)(FICI = 0.016)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suchodolski, J.; Derkacz, D.; Muraszko, J.; Panek, J.J.; Jezierska, A.; Łukaszewicz, M.; Krasowska, A. Fluconazole and Lipopeptide Surfactin Interplay During Candida albicans Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall Remodeling Increases Fungal Immune System Exposure. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12040314

AMA Style

Suchodolski J, Derkacz D, Muraszko J, Panek JJ, Jezierska A, Łukaszewicz M, Krasowska A. Fluconazole and Lipopeptide Surfactin Interplay During Candida albicans Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall Remodeling Increases Fungal Immune System Exposure. Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(4):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12040314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suchodolski, Jakub, Daria Derkacz, Jakub Muraszko, Jarosław J. Panek, Aneta Jezierska, Marcin Łukaszewicz, and Anna Krasowska. 2020. "Fluconazole and Lipopeptide Surfactin Interplay During Candida albicans Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall Remodeling Increases Fungal Immune System Exposure" Pharmaceutics 12, no. 4: 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12040314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop