Next Article in Journal
Structural Study of a New MbtI-Inhibitor Complex: Towards an Optimized Model for Structure-Based Drug Discovery
Next Article in Special Issue
Michelia compressa-Derived Santamarine Inhibits Oral Cancer Cell Proliferation via Oxidative Stress-Mediated Apoptosis and DNA Damage
Previous Article in Journal
Sarcosine May Induce EGF Production or Inhibit the Decline in EGF Concentrations in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia (Results of the PULSAR Study)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oral Cancer Pain Includes Thermal Allodynia That May Be Attenuated by Chronic Alcohol Consumption
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 16
Issue 11
10.3390/ph16111558
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Repurposing EGFR Inhibitors for Oral Cancer Pain and Opioid Tolerance

by
Maria Daniela Santi
1,2,
Morgan Zhang
1,2,
Naijiang Liu
1,2,
Chi T. Viet
3,
Tongxin Xie
4,
Dane D. Jensen
1,2,
Moran Amit
4,
Huilin Pan
5 and
Yi Ye
1,2,*
1
Translational Research Center, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
2
Pain Research Center, Department of Molecular Pathobiology, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
4
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
5
Center for Neuroscience and Pain Research, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(11), 1558; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111558
Submission received: 22 September 2023 / Revised: 24 October 2023 / Accepted: 27 October 2023 / Published: 3 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Candidates for the Treatment of Oral Cancer and Oral Cancer Pain)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oral cancer pain remains a significant public health concern. Despite the development of improved treatments, pain continues to be a debilitating clinical feature of the disease, leading to reduced oral mobility and diminished quality of life. Opioids are the gold standard treatment for moderate-to-severe oral cancer pain; however, chronic opioid administration leads to hyperalgesia, tolerance, and dependence. The aim of this review is to present accumulating evidence that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, often dysregulated in cancer, is also an emerging signaling pathway critically involved in pain and opioid tolerance. We presented preclinical and clinical data to demonstrate how repurposing EGFR inhibitors typically used for cancer treatment could be an effective pharmacological strategy to treat oral cancer pain and to prevent or delay the development of opioid tolerance. We also propose that EGFR interaction with the µ-opioid receptor and glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor could be two novel downstream mechanisms contributing to pain and morphine tolerance. Most data presented here support that repurposing EGFR inhibitors as non-opioid analgesics in oral cancer pain is promising and warrants further research.

1. Introduction

Oral cancer patients tend to experience significantly more pain than other cancer sufferers [1,2,3,4]. Among these patients, pain is often rated as the worst symptom, leading to restricted oral function such as eating, drinking, and speaking, and overall poor quality of life [1,5]. Neuropathic pain, a pathological state caused by abnormalities of the somatic nervous system [6], is regarded as the least tolerable symptom of advanced oral cancer [7]. Neuropathic pain is characterized by spontaneous pain, hyperalgesia, and mechanical allodynia and is often associated with anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life [6,8,9]. Pain can result from the tumor itself (through mass effect, ulceration, inflammation, or invasion) [3,10,11,12,13,14,15] or from the therapeutic approaches used to combat the disease, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and other targeted treatments [16]. Oral cancer patients need routine assessments of their pain and functional status to be provided with the most appropriate pain management. To date, opioid analgesics remain the first choice for the management of oral cancer pain [17]. However, these agents are not without their share of pitfalls. Opioid analgesics do not always provide complete pain relief and do little to restore function, such as swallowing and oral mobility. Moreover, regular use of opioids is associated with the development of analgesic tolerance and dependence, which fuel the opioid crisis we currently find ourselves in [18]. Therefore, safer and more effective approaches for managing oral cancer pain are urgently needed. Although oral cancer pain is a complex pathological process and a formidable clinical problem, many new reports [4,7,14,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] indicate promising ways to improve pain management. One strategy is inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity. In this review, we explore current clinical and preclinical evidence that supports the potential use of EGFR inhibitors to address pain and morphine tolerance in oral cancer, in addition to their established role as effective anticancer agents. The data summarized here were retrieved from PubMed with keywords search for EGFR + pain, EGFR + morphine tolerance, EGFR + oral cancer, MOR+ morphine tolerance, NMDAR + pain, NMDAR + MOR, and NMDAR + EGFR.

2. EGFR and Its Known Signaling Pathways

EGFR (ErbB1, HER1) is a 170 KD transmembrane protein that belongs to the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family and the ErbB/HER family [27,28]. EGFR plays essential roles in regulating prenatal development, adult tissue homeostasis, cell growth, proliferation, migration, metabolism, differentiation, and survival [8,29]. In physiological conditions, EGFR is expressed in human skin, placenta, endocrine tissues, immune cells, and the central nervous system [30,31]. EGFR is most well known for its involvement in tumorigenesis and cancer progression [8,32,33]. Notably, EGFR is highly expressed in the rat, mouse, and human dorsal root ganglia (DRG) [34,35]. EGFR is also expressed in the spinal cord of humans and mice [36], as well as rats [37].
Structurally, EGFR is a single-chain glycoprotein comprising an ectodomain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain that is composed of two subunits: the tyrosine kinase domain and the tyrosine C-terminal [29]. The ectodomain binds soluble ligands leading to conformational alterations that activate the receptor by homo- or heterodimerization with other HER receptors or other RTKs, such as hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR or MET) and the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). This, in turn, activates the intracellular kinase domain of EGFR, which results in autophosphorylation of the tyrosine residues at the C-terminal [29]. EGFR has seven reported ligands, each having a different affinity for the receptor: epidermal growth factor (EGF), betacellulin (BTC), heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), and transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα) as ligands with high binding affinity, and amphiregulin (AREG), epiregulin (EREG), and epithelial mitogen (EPGN) having low binding affinity [38].
In addition, EGFR can be indirectly stimulated by the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It has been reported that ligands of GPCRs, such as prostaglandin (PGE2) and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), which are often overexpressed in oral cancer, can activate GPCR and Src-mediated matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), leading to the cleavage and release of EGFR ligands [39]. The subsequent activation of EGFR can promote the expression of COX2 and PGE2, giving rise to a self-perpetuating positive feedback loop [39].
The interaction between EGFR and its ligands can activate a number of different signaling pathways, such as MAPK, PLCγ/PKC, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and the JAK/STAT pathway [8,39] (Figure 1). While the development and progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are known to be driven via EGFR-HB-EGF and EGFR-EREG interactions [40,41,42] in OSCC cells, pain is associated with EREG- or HB-EGF-mediated activation of EGFR [19,43,44]. Furthermore, morphine tolerance and dependence may cause downregulation of µ-opioid receptors via EGFR-EGF in rats and HEK293 cells [25,45] and EGFR-EREG in mice [43].

3. EGFR in Oral Cancer Treatment in Clinical Studies

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer ranked by incidence and mortality globally, with most lesions in the oral cavityOSCC comprises more than 90% of all oral malignancies [46]. Even with rigrous treatment, recurrence, and metastasis are common, accounting for a poor survival rate of 20–40% [47].
In 1991, Santini et al. described EGFR as a biomarker for HNSCC [48] after it was found to be overexpressed in human tumor tissues [49,50,51,52]. In response to this finding, EGFR-targeted therapy arose as an alternative therapeutic option for HNSCC. To date, there are two fundamental EGFR-targeted approaches for cancer treatment. One approach involves the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to the extracellular domain of EGFR, preventing receptor dimerization and subsequent activation, thereby leading to EGFR downregulation. Cetuximab is the only mAb approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC in combination with radiotherapy and as monotherapy for metastatic cases [53]. Despite panitumumab having failed to show efficacy in HNSCC (NCT00460265, NCT00820248), other mAbs, such as zalutumumab and nimotuzumab, currently in phase III clinical trials, have demonstrated promising results (NCT00382031, NCT00957086). Skin rashes, a main side effect of these treatments, are considered an indicator of drug efficacy [53,54,55].
The second approach involves the use of small molecules as irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). TKIs bind to the EGFR-intracellular tyrosine kinase domain and inhibit EGFR phosphorylation and subsequent downstream signaling. At present, there are no TKIs that are FDA-approved for HNSCC treatment. Gefitinib, a TKI currently used for lung cancer, failed to improve the overall survival and the progression-free survival in HNSCC as either monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (NCT00206219) or docetaxel (NCT00088907). On the other hand, erlotinib, approved for use in pancreatic cancer, has shown promising results in HNSCC clinical trials. Erlotinib used alone, in combination with cisplatin, or as an adjuvant improved overall survival, decreased HNSCC proliferation (NCT01515137), and prevented recurrence [56]. The non-selective EGFR/HER2 inhibitor, lapatinib, approved for use in breast cancer, did not provide a survival benefit in HNSCC (NCT00098631, NCT01044433, and NCT00424255), either alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy. Vandetanib, an EGFR/VGFR2 inhibitor, is currently being studied in HNSCC preclinical models and has shown promising results [53].
The current challenges of the HNSCC treatment with EGFR TKIs or mAbs lie in identifying possible EGFR mutations and counteracting the possible resistance mechanisms that these mutations produce. Although resistance to cetuximab has not been a concern in HNSCC, several resistance mechanisms have been reported in other cancer types, such as colorectal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Overexpression of EGFR ligands, nuclear translocation of EGFR, KRAS mutation, and PTEN loss are examples of resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR mAbs. This resistance leads to constant activation of EGFR and PI3K/AKT signaling. Some of these resistance mechanisms also apply to TKIs, along with evidence of EGFR mutations, IGF-1R activation, and histologic transformation [39].
Recent evidence suggests that the use of EGFR inhibitors in a multitargeted approach can be more beneficial for the treatment of HNSCC. Several studies have demonstrated that the combination of more than one HER inhibitors (known as horizontal targeting) or the combination of HER inhibitors with other TKIs (known as vertical targeting) improves treatment efficacy and prevents resistance [39,57]. The issue of resistance to EGFR inhibitors could also be addressed by targeting cancer metabolism, as evidenced by recent studies reporting a link between lipid metabolism and activation of downstream EGFR pathways, such as AKT [39,58,59]. Li et al. reported a link between cancer metabolism and cetuximab resistance in HNSCC in 2015 [60].

4. EGFR in Pain and Morphine Tolerance

4.1. Clinical Studies and Genetic Associations

The earliest evidence that TKIs might alleviate chronic pain came from clinical observations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving erlotinib treatment. These patients not only lived longer but also had improved tumor-related pain, physical function, and overall quality of life [8,61,62]. Afatinib, another TKI, was also reported to decrease pain in advanced lung cancer patients [63]. Moreover, a case report showed that afatinib was effective in relieving pain in a patient with severe neuropathic pain [64]. In addition, a phase III trial in patients with advanced SCC of the lung after having received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrated that afatinib improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and decreased pain [65].
Regarding mAbs, rectal cancer patients reported pain relief after treatment with cetuximab despite tumor progression [66]. Pain relief was also reported among neuropathic pain patients after treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab [67,68]. This was echoed in another study by Kersten and colleagues, who showed pain relief in 20 neuropathic pain patients of both sexes undergoing treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab, reporting skin reactions as the most common side effect [67]. The same researchers also reported a similar pain reduction response for treatment with TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib [9,69].
Genetic links that involve EGFR and pain were first reported in temporomandibular disorders, a common condition of orofacial pain by Dr. Luda Diatchenko’s group. In the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) project, it was shown that the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of EGFR and one of its cognate ligands (EREG) are associated with the development of chronic pain in temporomandibular disorders [43], especially in females of mixed European descendants. In addition, EREG SNPs, which lead to decreased circulating EREG mRNA, were negatively correlated with TMD development. Similar results were reported by Verma et al., who performed a systematically screen of SNPs in all gene loci belonging to EGFR and its ligands in the OPPERA cohort and found that EREG SNPs were associated with chronic pain intensity [70]. However, after characterization of the same EREG SNPs and acute and chronic pain states in OPPERA, they paradoxically found that the same EREG SNPs variant that was protective for chronic pain increased the risk for acute pain intensity. Using an independent cohort of TMD patients from the U.K. Biobank (UKB), the authors further validated the dichotomous role of EREG in acute and chronic pain states [70].
Genetic links that involved EGFR and pain were also found in other painful disease conditions. Recently, it was demonstrated that there was a positive association between tumors with EGFR mutations and higher rates of pain in response to palliative radiotherapy in an analysis of NSCLC patient-reported outcomes [71], further supporting the involvement of EGFR in both cancer progression and pain signaling. In an interactome study aimed to identify ligand-receptor pathways relevant to pain in a cell type-specific manner, Dr. Price’s group created interactome maps between human DRG sensory neurons and rheumatoid arthritis-associated synovial macrophages and pancreatic tumor tissue using published RNA-seq datasets. They found the abundance of EGFR ligands in the periphery and its receptor expressed on DRGs are important for persistent pain associated with these two painful disease states [44]. In a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) performed on 23,000 participants with musculoskeletal pain from the UKB, the authors identified a hit in SNP (rs549224715) on chromosome 4 to be significantly associated with analgesic ladder switch from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to opioids for pain management by comparing NSAID users and opioids users. In the subsequent network and pathway analysis on functional genes located on the significant loci, EGFR was identified as a central hub [72], further suggesting its potential role in pain progression.

4.2. EGFR Involvement in Pain in Animal Models

In most animal studies, EGFR signaling activation was pronociceptive (summarized in Table 1), where EGFR ligands induced or aggravated mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity, cold hypersensitivity, or other nociceptive behaviors. In the initial report on EGFR involvement in pain, it was shown that EREG is the only ligand among those tested (e.g., amphiregulin, EGF, TGF-α, Betacellulin) that can not only elicit an acute nociceptive response but also amplify existing pain when injected intrathecally [70]. Recently, it has been shown that other ligands like EGF [25], HB-EGF, and a peptide toxin mimicking the EGF domain of HB-EGF [69,72] can also elicit an acute nociceptive response when injected at the periphery. Downregulation of TGFαin DRGs, has been shown to suppress CCL2/CCR2 signaling and reduce pain in a surgically induced osteoarthritis pain model [73]. In addition, although directly behavioral data are lacking on epigen and pain, transgenic mice overexpressing epigen exhibit signs of neuropathies such as nerve demyelination, axon degeneration, and muscular atrophy in an EGFR-dependent manner [74].
Accordingly, inhibition of EGFR signaling reduces certain nociceptive behaviors (Table 1). EGFR signaling can be inhibited by a reduction in EGFR ligand expression [75,76,77] or release [73], by scavenging of EGFR ligands [25], or using EGFR TKIs (e.g., gefitinib, lapatinib, AG1478) [39].
It is important to note that the involvement of EGFR signaling in pain is context dependent, and its activation may even be neuroprotective or analgesic. Ligands like EREG have a dicrotous role in pain. EREG was discovered to be analgesic during acute pain [67] while being pronociceptive for chronic pain [39]. TGFα and HB-EGF were found to be elevated in degenerated osteoarthritis cartilage [78]. Accordingly, it was proposed that EGFR inhibitors could be repurposed for joint pain treatment, which was supported by several rodent studies with injury-induced osteoarthritis [75,76,79]. However, EGFR activation by intra-articular administration of TGFα, rather than EGFR inhibition, was reported to attenuate osteoarthritis pain [74,75,79]. In a rat visceral pain model, increased EGF levels have been implicated in upregulating serotonin transporter-mediated serotonin uptake in intestinal epithelial cells, therefore lowering the serotonin level and ultimately reducing rather than producing visceral hypersensitivity [76]. Finally, in a spinal nerve ligation model, where EGFR ligands are shown to play a role in the initiation of nerve injury-induced allodynia, but as the disease condition progresses, multiple additional effectors sustain the pain, so EGFR inhibition alone cannot reverse nociceptive responses [25].
Table 1. EGFR involvement in pain in animal models.
Table 1. EGFR involvement in pain in animal models.
CategoryProcedure or Animal ModelsSpeciesEGFR ActivationEGFR InhibitionRef.
Induced byBehavioral OutcomesInduced byBehavioral Outcomes
NociceptiveNoneMouseHB-EGF injected into the pawMechanical allodynia [44]
MouseHB-EGF mimicking toxin (intraplanar)Mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity [80]
RatEGF (i.t.)Mechanical allodynia [25]
MouseEpiregulin (i.t.)Mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity [43]
ADAM17 hypomorphic mutantMouse Reduced release of EGFR ligandsReduced mechanical allodynia, heat hypersensitivity, and cold hypersensitivity[81]
InflammatoryIntraplantar Injection of formalinMouseEpiregulin (i.t.)Analgesic during the early phase;
Aggravated late-phase nociceptive behavior (lick/bite)		 [43]
MouseEGF,
amphiregulin
betacellulin
TGFα (i.t.)		No effect
Mouse AG 1478, gefitinib, lapatinib (i.p.)Reversal of late-phase nociceptive behavior (licking/biting)
Injection of Complete Freund’s adjuvantMouse AG 1478, gefitinib, lapatinib (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia[43]
Injection of carrageenanMouse AG 1478, gefitinib, lapatinib (i.p.)Reversal of thermal hypersensitivity[43]
Anterior cruciate ligament, transection, and partial medial meniscectomyRat AG1478 (infusion)Reduced osteoarthritis at 4 and 7, not 10 wk postsurgery in males[75,82]
DMM-induced osteoarthritisMouse Downregulation of TGFα in DRGs by miR-183 Reduced mechanical allodynia at 8 wk postsurgery in males[73]
DMM-induced osteoarthritisMouseHB-EGF overexpression, or TGFα (intra-articular)Reversal of mechanical allodynia after 1 week postsurgeryGefitinib (oral)No reversal of mechanical allodynia after 1 wk postsurgery[78]
DMM-induced osteoarthritis in EGFR knockout miceMouse Reduced intra-articular EGFR expressionDevelopment of mechanical allodynia 1 month postsurgery[83]
Tibial loading of 6 NewtonMouseIntra-articular HB-EGF overexpressionReversal of mechanical allodynia [77]
Intra-colonic infusion of acetic acidRat Lower EGF levels in plasma and colonDevelopment of visceral hypersensitivity[84]
NeuropathicSpared nerve injuryMouse EGFR inhibitor III (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia[85]
Mouse AG 1478, gefitinib, lapatinib (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia[43]
Chronic constriction injuryMouse AG 1478, gefitinib, lapatinib (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia[43]
Rat Erlotinib (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity, cold hypersensitivity[86]
Gefitinib, AG 1478, falnidamol, EGFRi 324674 (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia
Lapatinib, afatinib (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia
Geniposide (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity[87]
Lumbar spinal nerve ligationRat Imatinib, gefitinib, EGF-scavenging molecule (i.t.)No reversal of mechanical allodynia[25]
Injection of oxaliplatinMouse Erlotinib, gefitinib, AG 1478 (i.p.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia[86]
MixedInjecting cancer cell supernatant into the tongueMouse Cetuximab (i.p.)Reversal of orofacial nociceptive behavior[19]
Chronic DRG compressionRat Gefitinib, EGFR siRNA (i.t.)Reversal of mechanical allodynia, thermal hypersensitivity, cold hypersensitivity[88]
Note: EGFR signaling activation was nociceptive in all listed models except the models depicted in italics. The following abbreviations have been used: DMM: destabilization of the medial meniscus by surgery; DRG: dorsal root ganglions; i.t.: intrathecal; i.p.: intraperitoneal; wk: weeks.

4.3. Downstream Signaling Cascade of EGFR Signaling in Pain

The downstream effects of EGFR are mediated by one of several important signaling pathways (listed below) to induce hypersensitivity by EGFR activation or reduce pain by EGFR inhibition.
(1) PI3K/AKT/mTOR (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin): A study of nocifensive behaviors in a formalin-induced inflammatory pain mouse model [43] revealed that EREG upregulation in the blood might activate EGFRs on DRG neurons through the mTOR signaling pathway, which increases phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and then MMP-9 translation. MMP-9 is important in inducing early-phase neuropathic pain by activating IL-1β, TNF-α, and microglia [89]. In addition, gene expression analysis of multiple human cancer cell lines showed that the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (including EGFR and mTOR) contained the highest number of differentially expressed genes with the nociceptive trait matched to that obtained in a mouse model of acute oral cancer pain [19];
(2) PI3K/AKT/LRP1 (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1): A study in a neuropathic pain model on rats identified that the increased excitability and excessive firing that are likely to underlie pain hypersensitivity may be caused by increased EGFR and AKT recruitment of Nav1.9, Nav1.8, and Cav1.2 by LRP1 (as the vesicular chaperone) to the apical plasma membrane and proximal stem axon of primary afferent nociceptive neurons after nerve injury [86];
(3) GCH1/BH4 (GTP cyclohydrolase-1/6R-L-erythro-5, 6, 7, 8-tetrahydrobiopterin): In rat and human DRG neurons, BH4 was proposed to bind with nNOS, resulting in increased production of NO, which sensitizes the transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV1) or the transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily A member 1 (TRPA1) channels [90]. A study with a neuropathic pain mouse model [85] uncovered that EGFR/Kirsten ras sarcoma virus (KRAS) signaling triggers increased GCH1 expression, leading to an increase in BH4 and persistent pain sensitivity;
(4) In sensory neurons, EGFR also affects other targets, e.g., δ-opioid receptors [91], beta-adrenergic receptors [92], calcium channels [44], cannabinoid type 1, and TRPV1 receptors [43,93], which are important for pain processing;
(5) In glial cells, e.g., satellite glial cells, EGFR is also expressed [34]. Satellite glial cells are activated by compressed DRGs and release proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, to further activate glia; EGFR inhibition may reduce the release of proinflammatory cytokines and then relieve chronic DRG compression-induced pain hypersensitivities [34];
(6) In osteoarthritis pain, EGFR signaling activation has a tissue-dependent effect. In mouse articular cartilage, EGFR signaling may have a protective role against osteoarthritis pain by maintaining the number and properties of superficial chondrocytes, promoting chondrogenic proteoglycan 4 (Prg4) expression, and stimulating the lubrication function of the cartilage surface, which is otherwise diminished in osteoarthritis [77,78,83]. Nonetheless, in mouse DRG, TGFα activation of EGFR was reported to promote movement-provoked pain via a TGFα-mediated C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)/CC-chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) signaling axis [73,75,82].

4.4. EGFR Involvement in Morphine Tolerance in Animal Models

EGFR has also been demonstrated to mediate opioid tolerance in several rodent models, including two chronic pain models of spinal nerve ligation (SNL)-induced peripheral neuropathies and cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) [25,94] and pre-tolerance in morphine-naive rats [25] (summarized in Table 2) where enhanced EGFR signaling can aggravate while suppression of EGFR signaling can alleviate morphine tolerance [25,94].
EGFR signaling involved in morphine tolerance occurs predominantly in the spinal cord [25,94], including both neurons and microglia. In a CIBP model in rats, Yang et al. demonstrated that morphine tolerance correlates with a sustained increase in the protein levels of EGFR (both in microglia and neurons), p-EGFR, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 in the spinal cord as well as microglia proliferation. In contrast, inhibition of EGFR signaling by intrathecal administration of AG1478 markedly attenuated the degree of morphine tolerance in morphine-treated sham or CIBP rats, as well as decreased the number of microglia, and the protein levels of EGFR, p-EGFR, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 in the spinal cord [26]. In another in vivo model of opioid-induced tolerance, whereby rats were administered morphine for five consecutive days, it was demonstrated that EGFR is both necessary and sufficient to induce opioid tolerance and mechanical sensitization. Furthermore, inhibition of EGFR signaling by gefitinib restored morphine analgesic effect against mechanical allodynia, and chronic injections of EGF caused a decrease in paw withdrawal threshold, contributing to the development of pre-tolerance [25].

4.5. Possible Downstream Signaling Cascades of EGFR in Opioid Tolerance

4.5.1. EGFR and MOR Interactions

Opioid analgesia is mediated mainly by the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), which is expressed both in the CNS (spinal cord and brain) and in the PNS (DRGs and peripheral nerves). MOR is a G protein-coupled receptor that pairs with inhibitory G proteins (Gi and Go) [95]. After acute administration, MOR agonists inhibit voltage-gated calcium channels in primary sensory neurons [96,97], resulting in an inhibition of inflammatory and pain signaling pathways. However, other mechanisms are activated when morphine is administered chronically [45,98]. Tolerance is a consequence of adaptive mechanisms functioning at different levels (cellular, synaptic, and network), in which the activity of MOR is altered in order to restore normal function following the perturbation produced by opioid agonists [98]. The following summarizes the proposed mechanisms underlie opioid tolerance:
(1)
Receptor tolerance: loss of surface MOR receptors, phosphorylation of MOR, internalization/endocytosis, sequestration/recycling, and downregulation/desensitization [99];
(2)
Cellular tolerance and withdrawal: upregulation of cAMP, increase in adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity and sensitization [45];
(3)
Synaptic plasticity in tolerance and hyperalgesia: potentiated presynaptic NMDAR activity at the spinal cord level [100,101].
The cross-talk between MOR and EGFR was explored in vitro in primary cultured cortical neurons (from the whole cortex) isolated from neonatal (postnatal days 1–2) by Zhao et al. They found that, after chronic morphine treatment, adaptive changes in both MOR and EGFR signal systems lead to an AC5 superactivation and subsequent development of tolerance. Furthermore, in N2A-EGFR cells (a neuroblastoma cell line expressing EGFR), the same group observed that chronic morphine administration led to increased EGFR phosphorylation and translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum, which was essential for posterior MOR-CRT (calreticulin) tethering, leading to increased AC5 activity [45]. Studies of primary afferent nociceptors in mice showed that EGFR is involved in MOR prolongation of hyperalgesia induced by PGE2 [8,102,103]. Moreover, it has been shown that in A431 cells (epidermoid carcinoma cells that express EGFR) as well as HEK293 cells co-expressing GPCR kinase-2 and EGFR, EGFR activation by EGF led to a downregulation of the opioid receptor as a consequence of its interaction with G proteins, which activated GPCR kinases [91,104]. It was reported that, after activation, MOR associates with ꞵ-arrestins, thereby inducing receptor internalization and downregulation in different in vivo models [8,102,105]. Figure 2 summarizes pathways of morphine tolerance potentially regulated by EGFR and MOR interactions.

4.5.2. EGFR and NMDA Receptor Interactions

Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) are heterothermies consisting of two obligatory subunits (GluN1) and two regulatory subunits (GluN2A-2D or GluN3), with GluN2A and GluN2B being the most extensively studied due to their role in synaptic activity [106]. NMDAR plays a role in physiological processes within the CNS (synaptogenesis, plasticity) and in various neurological disorders, such as schizophrenia, epilepsy, ischemic brain damage, and neurodegenerative disorders [106,107]. Furthermore, increased activity of spinal NMDAR, particularly α2δ-1-bound NMDAR [108,109,110], has a major role in the development of central sensitization and neuropathic pain [111]. In the hippocampus, EGF treatment increases NMDAR phosphorylation and surface expression of the GluN2B, contributing to long-term potentiation (LTP) [106].
NMDAR expressed in primary sensory neurons, and their central terminals in the spinal cord also promotes opioid-induced hyperalgesia and analgesic tolerance. Increased glutamate activity under chronic morphine can induce hyperalgesia/allodynia and consequently counteract opioid analgesia. That event occurs at different levels:
(1) Neuronal circuits (synaptic signaling), such as suppressing MOR signaling via (a) dimerization with presynaptic mGluR5 to potentiate NMDAR synaptic expression and activity, and (b) complex with three functionally interrelated MAPKs (ERK1/2, p38, and JNK) to induce a tonic activation of presynaptic NMDARs [112] at primary afferent central terminals;
(2) Cellular adaptations, which include gene expression [113,114,115] and the reduction in MOR function. An exemplar study of the latter is that increased activity of NMDAR by PKC/PKA-induced phosphorylation of its GluN2A and GluN2B subunits leads to higher calcium influx, increased release of NO, and subsequent negative regulation of MOR activity [116].
Pharmacological studies have identified several signaling proteins involved in the interaction between glutamate/NMDAR and opioid/MOR tolerance. Some of them include nitric oxide synthase (NOS), protein kinase C (PKC), protein kinase A (PKA), calcium (Ca2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), delta-opioid receptor (DOR) and the regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins [114,117,118].
EGFR signaling was shown to be responsible for an increase in NMDAR calcium currents as a consequence of in vitro EGF-mediated increased expression and phosphorylation of GluN2B subunit in primary hippocampal cells cultured from Sprague–Dawley rat fetuses on embryonic days 17–19 [106]. The same subunit was reported as a substrate for EGFR in glioma cells [119], where EGFR phosphorylates the COOH-terminal domain of the subunit, leading to an increase in glutamate-NMDAR signaling. Similarly, in an HB-EGF knockout mice model, the absence of the EGFR ligand led to reduced protein levels of the GluN1 subunit and calcium influx [120]. LTP, a maladaptive plasticity involved in numerous pathologies, including hyperalgesia, drug addiction, and tolerance, can be triggered by opioids in the spinal cord of rats and mice [100,101]. EGFR signaling activation by EGF enhances LTP in hippocampal primary cultures derived from rat fetuses [106]. EGFR activation may lead to synaptic NMDAR hypersensitivity in the pain pathways to induce morphine tolerance (Figure 3).

5. Challenges

To implement EGFR inhibitors for cancer pain control, several challenges remain. The underlying mechanisms of EGFR’s pronociceptive actions are still evolving. The potential interaction of EGFR with MOR and NMDAR reviewed above has not been studied directly in the pain pathways. Resistance to EGFR inhibitors may potentially limit their prolonged use for pain management. Lastly, the content-dependent action of EGFR ligands in pain and the paradox of EGFR activation suppressing acute pain in certain conditions warrant a closer examination of the nuanced roles of each ligand and their downstream signaling pathways. Nevertheless, similar strategies used in treating cancer can be adopted for pain, such as developing new generations of EGFR inhibitors, employing different combinations of EGFR inhibitors, and/or combinations with non-EGFR inhibitors to develop non-opioid analgesics to treat oral cancer pain.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

EGFR inhibitors for cancer therapies are an area of active research, with many already on the market [121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133]. Emerging evidence suggests that EGFR expressed along the pain signaling pathway may play a significant role in regulating pain and promoting opioid analgesic tolerance and dependence. EGFR inhibitors could be repurposed for oral cancer pain management because their safety profile is well known. The benefits of repurposing EGFR inhibitors as non-opioid analgesics are promising and clearly warrant further research. This is particularly crucial in our current climate as we endeavor to fight the opioid overdose epidemic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y.; resources, Y.Y.; data curation, M.D.S., M.Z., N.L. and Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.S., N.L. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y., M.D.S., H.P., M.A., T.X., C.T.V. and D.D.J.; visualization, M.D.S. and M.Z.; supervision, Y.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NIH grant number R01DE029493 (Y.Y.) R01DE032501 (Y.Y.), and RM1DE033491 (Y.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Connelly, S.T.; Schmidt, B.L. Evaluation of pain in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Pain 2004, 5, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Epstein, J.B.; Elad, S.; Eliav, E.; Jurevic, R.; Benoliel, R. Orofacial pain in cancer: Part II—Clinical perspectives and management. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Viet, C.T.; Schmidt, B.L. Biologic mechanisms of oral cancer pain and implications for clinical therapy. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dang, D.; Ye, Y.; Aouizerat, B.E.; Patel, Y.K.; Viet, D.T.; Chan, K.C.; Ono, K.; Doan, C.; Figueroa, J.D.; Yu, G.; et al. Targeting the endothelin axis as a therapeutic strategy for oral cancer metastasis and pain. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Epstein, J.B.; Miaskowski, C. Oral Pain in the Cancer Patient. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2019, 2019, lgz003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wei, Z.; Fei, Y.; Su, W.; Chen, G. Emerging Role of Schwann Cells in Neuropathic Pain: Receptors, Glial Mediators and Myelination. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ye, Y.; Jensen, D.D.; Viet, C.T.; Pan, H.L.; Campana, W.M.; Amit, M.; Boada, M.D. Advances in Head and Neck Cancer Pain. J. Dent. Res. 2022, 101, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Borges, J.P.; Mekhail, K.; Fairn, G.D.; Antonescu, C.N.; Steinberg, B.E. Modulation of Pathological Pain by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 642820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kersten, C.; Cameron, M.G.; Laird, B.; Mjaland, S. Epidermal growth factor receptor-inhibition (EGFR-I) in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Br. J. Anaesth. 2015, 115, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Portenoy, R.K.; Ahmed, E. Cancer Pain Syndromes. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 32, 371–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Romero-Reyes, M.; Salvemini, D. Cancer and orofacial pain. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2016, 21, e665–e671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schmidt, B.L.; Hamamoto, D.T.; Simone, D.A.; Wilcox, G.L. Mechanism of cancer pain. Mol. Interv. 2010, 10, 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Benoliel, R.; Epstein, J.; Eliav, E.; Jurevic, R.; Elad, S. Orofacial pain in cancer: Part I—Mechanisms. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Doan, C.; Aouizerat, B.E.; Ye, Y.; Dang, D.; Asam, K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Howard, T.; Patel, Y.K.; Viet, D.T.; Figueroa, J.D.; et al. Neurotrophin Pathway Receptors NGFR and TrkA Control Perineural Invasion, Metastasis, and Pain in Oral Cancer. Adv. Biol. (Weinh) 2022, 6, e2200190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Salvo, E.; Campana, W.M.; Scheff, N.N.; Nguyen, T.H.; Jeong, S.H.; Wall, I.; Wu, A.K.; Zhang, S.; Kim, H.; Bhattacharya, A.; et al. Peripheral nerve injury and sensitization underlie pain associated with oral cancer perineural invasion. Pain 2020, 161, 2592–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Al-Ansari, S.; Zecha, J.A.; Barasch, A.; de Lange, J.; Rozema, F.R.; Raber-Durlacher, J.E. Oral Mucositis Induced By Anticancer Therapies. Curr. Oral Health Rep. 2015, 2, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paice, J.A. Cancer pain management and the opioid crisis in America: How to preserve hard-earned gains in improving the quality of cancer pain management. Cancer 2018, 124, 2491–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Paice, J.A. Navigating Cancer Pain Management in the Midst of the Opioid Epidemic. Oncology 2018, 32, 403. [Google Scholar]
  19. Scheff, N.N.; Ye, Y.; Conley, Z.R.; Quan, J.W.; Lam, Y.V.R.; Klares, R., 3rd; Singh, K.; Schmidt, B.L.; Aouizerat, B.E. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 17-epidermal growth factor receptor signaling contributes to oral cancer pain. Pain 2020, 161, 2330–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ye, Y.; Salvo, E.; Romero-Reyes, M.; Akerman, S.; Shimizu, E.; Kobayashi, Y.; Michot, B.; Gibbs, J. Glia and Orofacial Pain: Progress and Future Directions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salvo, E.; Tu, N.H.; Scheff, N.N.; Dubeykovskaya, Z.A.; Chavan, S.A.; Aouizerat, B.E.; Ye, Y. TNFalpha promotes oral cancer growth, pain, and Schwann cell activation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tu, N.H.; Jensen, D.D.; Anderson, B.M.; Chen, E.; Jimenez-Vargas, N.N.; Scheff, N.N.; Inoue, K.; Tran, H.D.; Dolan, J.C.; Meek, T.A.; et al. Legumain Induces Oral Cancer Pain by Biased Agonism of Protease-Activated Receptor-2. J. Neurosci. 2021, 41, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vazquez-Cuevas, F.G.; Reyna-Jeldes, M.; Velazquez-Miranda, E.; Coddou, C. Transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases by purinergic P2Y and adenosine receptors. Purinergic Signal. 2022, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yin, Z.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.W.; Subudhi, S.; Ho, W.; Lee, G.Y.; Wang, A.; Gao, X.; et al. Co-Targeting IL-6 and EGFR signaling for the treatment of schwannomatosis and associated pain. bioRxiv 2023, Preprint. [Google Scholar]
  25. Puig, S.; Donica, C.L.; Gutstein, H.B. EGFR Signaling Causes Morphine Tolerance and Mechanical Sensitization in Rats. eNeuro 2020, 7, ENEURO.0460-18.2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hu, R.; Yan, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Jiang, H. Morphine promotes microglial activation by upregulating the EGFR/ERK signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sharma, B.; Singh, V.J.; Chawla, P.A. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors as potential anticancer agents: An update of recent progress. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 116, 105393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Donier, E.; Gomez-Sanchez, J.A.; Grijota-Martinez, C.; Lakoma, J.; Baars, S.; Garcia-Alonso, L.; Cabedo, H. L1CAM binds ErbB receptors through Ig-like domains coupling cell adhesion and neuregulin signalling. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wieduwilt, M.J.; Moasser, M.M. The epidermal growth factor receptor family: Biology driving targeted therapeutics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 1566–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. The Human Protein Atlas: EGFR Expression. 2023. Volume 2023, v23.0. Available online: proteinatlas.org (accessed on 22 September 2023).
  31. Uhlen, M.; Zhang, C.; Lee, S.; Sjostedt, E.; Fagerberg, L.; Bidkhori, G.; Benfeitas, R.; Arif, M.; Liu, Z.; Edfors, F.; et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 2017, 357, 2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, W.Q.; Zeng, L.S.; Wang, L.F.; Wang, Y.Y.; Cheng, J.T.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Z.W.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, S.L.; Wang, X.W.; et al. The Latest Battles Between EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies and Resistant Tumor Cells. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, X.-F.; Liu, Z.C.; Xie, B.-F.; Li, Z.-M.; Feng, G.-K.; Yang, D.; Zenga, Y.-X. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478 inhibits cell proliferation and arrests cell cycle in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2001, 169, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.; Liu, S.; Xu, L.; Zhu, X.; Liu, W.; Tian, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nagendra, B.V.P.; Jia, S.; et al. The upregulation of EGFR in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to chronic compression of dorsal root ganglions-induced neuropathic pain in rats. Mol. Pain. 2019, 15, 1744806919857297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huerta, J.J.; Diaz-Trelles, R.; Naves, F.J.; Llamosas, M.M.; Del Valle, M.E.; Vega, J.A. Epidermal growth factor receptor in adult human dorsal root ganglia. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 1996, 194, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, Q.; Wu, X.; Fan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Han, S.; Xu, B.; Chen, B.; Han, J.; et al. Single-cell analysis reveals dynamic changes of neural cells in developing human spinal cord. EMBO Rep. 2021, 22, e52728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, L.L.; Li, X.D.; Yang, W.W.; Chen, J.; Gu, M.; Gu, X.S.; et al. Evolution of the ErbB gene family and analysis of regulators of Egfr expression during development of the rat spinal cord. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 2484–2490. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Singh, B.; Carpenter, G.; Coffey, R.J. EGF receptor ligands: Recent advances. F1000Research 2016, 5, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Byeon, H.K.; Ku, M.; Yang, J. Beyond EGFR inhibition: Multilateral combat strategies to stop the progression of head and neck cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ohnishi, Y.; Inoue, H.; Furukawa, M.; Kakudo, K.; Nozaki, M. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor is a potent regulator of invasion activity in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 27, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Simabuco, F.M.; Kawahara, R.; Yokoo, S.; Granato, D.C.; Miguel, L.; Agostini, M.; Aragao, A.Z.; Domingues, R.R.; Flores, I.L.; Macedo, C.C.; et al. ADAM17 mediates OSCC development in an orthotopic murine model. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kong, D.C.; Chew, K.Y.; Tan, E.L.; Khoo, S.P. The effect of epiregulin on epidermal growth factor receptor expression and proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Cell Int. 2014, 14, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Martin, L.J.; Smith, S.B.; Khoutorsky, A.; Magnussen, C.A.; Samoshkin, A.; Sorge, R.E.; Cho, C.; Yosefpour, N.; Sivaselvachandran, S.; Tohyama, S.; et al. Epiregulin and EGFR interactions are involved in pain processing. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3353–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wangzhou, A.; Paige, C.; Neerukonda, S.V.; Naik, D.K.; Kume, M.; David, E.T.; Dussor, G.; Ray, P.R.; Price, T.J. A ligand-receptor interactome platform for discovery of pain mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Sci. Signal. 2021, 14, eabe1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, H.; Wu, G.; Cao, X. EGFR dependent subcellular communication was responsible for morphine mediated AC superactivation. Cell Signal. 2013, 25, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Badwelan, M.; Muaddi, H.; Ahmed, A.; Lee, K.T.; Tran, S.D. Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Concomitant Primary Tumors, What Do We Know? A Review of the Literature. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 3721–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumar, S.; Noronha, V.; Patil, V.; Joshi, A.; Menon, N.; Prabhash, K. Advances in pharmacotherapy for head and neck cancer. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2021, 22, 2007–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Santini, J.; Formento, J.L.; Francoual, M.; Milano, G.; Schneider, M.; Dassonville, O.; Demard, F. Characterization, quantification, and potential clinical value of the epidermal growth factor receptor in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Head. Neck. 1991, 13, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rubin Grandis, J.; Melhem, M.F.; Barnes, E.L.; Tweardy, D.J. Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 1996, 78, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Psyrri, A.; Seiwert, T.Y.; Jimeno, A. Molecular pathways in head and neck cancer: EGFR, PI3K, and more. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2013, 33, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zimmermann, M.; Zouhair, A.; Azria, D.; Ozsahin, M. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck cancer: Its role and treatment implications. Radiat. Oncol. 2006, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Grandis, J.R.; Tweardy, D.J. Elevated levels of transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA are early markers of carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 3579–3584. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Kordbacheh, F.; Farah, C.S. Current and Emerging Molecular Therapies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rivera, F.; Vega-Villegas, M.E.; Lopez-Brea, M.F.; Marquez, R. Current situation of Panitumumab, Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab. Acta Oncol. 2008, 47, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Garcia-Foncillas, J.; Sunakawa, Y.; Aderka, D.; Wainberg, Z.; Ronga, P.; Witzler, P.; Stintzing, S. Distinguishing Features of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Le, X.; Gleber-Netto, F.O.; Rubin, M.L.; Qing, Y.; Du, R.; Kies, M.; Blumenschein, G., Jr.; Lu, C.; Johnson, F.M.; Bell, D.; et al. Induction chemotherapy with or without erlotinib in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma amenable for surgical resection. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, C.; Iida, M.; Dunn, E.F.; Ghia, A.J.; Wheeler, D.L. Nuclear EGFR contributes to acquired resistance to cetuximab. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3801–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. von Roemeling, C.A.; Copland, J.A. Targeting lipid metabolism for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2016, 20, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rohrig, F.; Schulze, A. The multifaceted roles of fatty acid synthesis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 732–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, X.; Lu, Y.; Lu, H.; Luo, J.; Hong, Y.; Fan, Z. AMPK-mediated energy homeostasis and associated metabolic effects on cancer cell response and resistance to cetuximab. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 11507–11518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bezjak, A.; Tu, D.; Seymour, L.; Clark, G.; Trajkovic, A.; Zukin, M.; Ayoub, J.; Lago, S.; de Albuquerque Ribeiro, R.; Gerogianni, A.; et al. Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: Quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 3831–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cappuzzo, F.; Ciuleanu, T.; Stelmakh, L.; Cicenas, S.; Szczesna, A.; Juhasz, E.; Esteban, E.; Molinier, O.; Brugger, W.; Melezinek, I.; et al. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hirsh, V.; Cadranel, J.; Cong, X.J.; Fairclough, D.; Finnern, H.W.; Lorence, R.M.; Miller, V.A.; Palmer, M.; Yang, J.C. Symptom and quality of life benefit of afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients previously treated with erlotinib or gefitinib: Results of a randomized phase IIb/III trial (LUX-Lung 1). J. Thorac. Oncol. 2013, 8, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cameron, M.G.; Kersten, C. Differential effects of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in a single patient with neuropathic pain. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e239385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Felip, E.; Hirsh, V.; Popat, S.; Cobo, M.; Fulop, A.; Dayen, C.; Trigo, J.M.; Gregg, R.; Waller, C.F.; Soria, J.C.; et al. Symptom and Quality of Life Improvement in LUX-Lung 8, an Open-Label Phase III Study of Second-Line Afatinib Versus Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Clin. Lung Cancer 2018, 19, 74–83.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kersten, C.; Cameron, M.G. Cetuximab alleviates neuropathic pain despite tumour progression. BMJ Case Rep. 2012, 2012, bcr1220115374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kersten, C.; Cameron, M.G.; Mjaland, S. Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)-inhibition for relief of neuropathic pain-A case series. Scand. J. Pain 2013, 4, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kersten, C.; Cameron, M.G.; Bailey, A.G.; Fallon, M.T.; Laird, B.J.; Paterson, V.; Mitchell, R.; Fleetwood-Walker, S.M.; Daly, F.; Mjaland, S. Relief of Neuropathic Pain Through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition: A Randomized Proof-of-Concept Trial. Pain. Med. 2019, 20, 2495–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cameron, M.G.; Kersten, C. Prospective case series of neuropathic cancer pain in patients treated with an EGFR-inhibitor. Palliat. Med. 2022, 36, 1154–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Verma, V.; Khoury, S.; Parisien, M.; Cho, C.; Maixner, W.; Martin, L.J.; Diatchenko, L. The dichotomous role of epiregulin in pain. Pain 2020, 161, 1052–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sit, D.; Bale, M.; Lapointe, V.; Olson, R.; Hsu, F. Association Between EGFR and ALK Mutation Status on Patient-Reported Symptoms After Palliative Radiation for Bone Pain in NSCLC. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2022, 3, 100371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, S.; Poelmans, G.; van Boekel, R.L.M.; Coenen, M.J.H. Genome-wide association study on pharmacological outcomes of musculoskeletal pain in UK Biobank. Pharmacogenomics J. 2023. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, B.; Yang, X.; Su, M. MicroRNA-183 attenuates osteoarthritic pain by inhibiting the TGFalpha-mediated CCL2/CCR2 signalling axis. Bone Jt. Res. 2021, 10, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dahlhoff, M.; Emrich, D.; Wolf, E.; Schneider, M.R. Increased activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in transgenic mice overexpressing epigen causes peripheral neuropathy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1832, 2068–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Appleton, C.T.; Usmani, S.E.; Pest, M.A.; Pitelka, V.; Mort, J.S.; Beier, F. Reduction in disease progression by inhibition of transforming growth factor alpha-CCL2 signaling in experimental posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 2691–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shin, S.Y.; Pozzi, A.; Boyd, S.K.; Clark, A.L. Integrin alpha1beta1 protects against signs of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in the female murine knee partially via regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signalling. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016, 24, 1795–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jia, H.; Ma, X.; Tong, W.; Doyran, B.; Sun, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Badar, F.; Chandra, A.; et al. EGFR signaling is critical for maintaining the superficial layer of articular cartilage and preventing osteoarthritis initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14360–14365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Quarta, S.; Mitric, M.; Kalpachidou, T.; Mair, N.; Schiefermeier-Mach, N.; Andratsch, M.; Qi, Y.; Langeslag, M.; Malsch, P.; Rose-John, S.; et al. Impaired mechanical, heat, and cold nociception in a murine model of genetic TACE/ADAM17 knockdown. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 4418–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sun, H.; Wu, Y.; Pan, Z.; Yu, D.; Chen, P.; Zhang, X.; Wu, H.; Zhang, X.; An, C.; Chen, Y.; et al. Gefitinib for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activated Osteoarthritis Subpopulation Treatment. EBioMedicine 2018, 32, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Eagles, D.A.; Saez, N.J.; Krishnarjuna, B.; Bradford, J.J.; Chin, Y.K.; Starobova, H.; Mueller, A.; Reichelt, M.E.; Undheim, E.A.B.; Norton, R.S.; et al. A peptide toxin in ant venom mimics vertebrate EGF-like hormones to cause long-lasting hypersensitivity in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2112630119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Miller, R.E.; Tran, P.B.; Das, R.; Ghoreishi-Haack, N.; Ren, D.; Miller, R.J.; Malfait, A.M. CCR2 chemokine receptor signaling mediates pain in experimental osteoarthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20602–20607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wei, Y.; Luo, L.; Gui, T.; Yu, F.; Yan, L.; Yao, L.; Zhong, L.; Yu, W.; Han, B.; Patel, J.M.; et al. Targeting cartilage EGFR pathway for osteoarthritis treatment. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabb3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gui, T.; Wei, Y.; Luo, L.; Li, J.; Zhong, L.; Yao, L.; Beier, F.; Nelson, C.L.; Tsourkas, A.; Liu, X.S.; et al. Activating EGFR Signaling Attenuates Osteoarthritis Development Following Loading Injury in Mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022, 37, 2498–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cui, X.F.; Zhou, W.M.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.L.; Lin, L.; Zhang, H.J. Epidermal growth factor upregulates serotonin transporter and its association with visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 13521–13529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cronin, S.J.F.; Rao, S.; Tejada, M.A.; Turnes, B.L.; Licht-Mayer, S.; Omura, T.; Brenneis, C.; Jacobs, E.; Barrett, L.; Latremoliere, A.; et al. Phenotypic drug screen uncovers the metabolic GCH1/BH4 pathway as key regulator of EGFR/KRAS-mediated neuropathic pain and lung cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabj1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mitchell, R.; Mikolajczak, M.; Kersten, C.; Fleetwood-Walker, S. ErbB1-dependent signalling and vesicular trafficking in primary afferent nociceptors associated with hypersensitivity in neuropathic pain. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 142, 104961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, D.D.; Chen, Q.Q.; Yao, L. Geniposide Alleviates Neuropathic Pain in CCI Rats by Inhibiting the EGFR/PI3K/AKT Pathway And Ca(2+) Channels. Neurotox. Res. 2022, 40, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wang, Z.; Jiang, C.; He, Q.; Matsuda, M.; Han, Q.; Wang, K.; Bang, S.; Ding, H.; Ko, M.C.; Ji, R.R. Anti-PD-1 treatment impairs opioid antinociception in rodents and nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, aaw6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ji, R.R.; Xu, Z.Z.; Wang, X.; Lo, E.H. Matrix metalloprotease regulation of neuropathic pain. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Latremoliere, A.; Costigan, M. GCH1, BH4 and pain. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2011, 12, 1728–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, Y.; Long, H.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Ma, L. EGF transregulates opioid receptors through EGFR-mediated GRK2 phosphorylation and activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 2973–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, X.; Wu, W.K.; Yu, L.; Li, Z.J.; Sung, J.J.; Zhang, S.T.; Cho, C.H. Epidermal growth factor-induced esophageal cancer cell proliferation requires transactivation of beta-adrenoceptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 326, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yang, H.; Wang, Z.; Capo-Aponte, J.E.; Zhang, F.; Pan, Z.; Reinach, P.S. Epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation by the cannabinoid receptor (CB1) and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) induces differential responses in corneal epithelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 91, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Hu, R.; Sun, Y.; Xiang, L.; Yan, J.; Jiang, H. Activation of the spinal EGFR signaling pathway in a rat model of cancer-induced bone pain with morphine tolerance. Neuropharmacology 2021, 196, 108703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lueptow, L.M.; Fakira, A.K.; Bobeck, E.N. The Contribution of the Descending Pain Modulatory Pathway in Opioid Tolerance. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wu, Z.Z.; Pan, H.L. High voltage-activated Ca(2+) channel currents in isolectin B(4)-positive and -negative small dorsal root ganglion neurons of rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 368, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pan, H.L.; Wu, Z.Z.; Zhou, H.Y.; Chen, S.R.; Zhang, H.M.; Li, D.P. Modulation of pain transmission by G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 117, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Christie, M.J. Cellular neuroadaptations to chronic opioids: Tolerance, withdrawal and addiction. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 154, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, S.R.; Prunean, A.; Pan, H.M.; Welker, K.L.; Pan, H.L. Resistance to morphine analgesic tolerance in rats with deleted transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1-expressing sensory neurons. Neuroscience 2007, 145, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Zhou, H.Y.; Chen, S.R.; Chen, H.; Pan, H.L. Opioid-induced long-term potentiation in the spinal cord is a presynaptic event. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 4460–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, S.R.; Chen, H.; Jin, D.; Pan, H.L. Brief Opioid Exposure Paradoxically Augments Primary Afferent Input to Spinal Excitatory Neurons via alpha2delta-1-Dependent Presynaptic NMDA Receptors. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 9315–9329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Araldi, D.; Ferrari, L.F.; Levine, J.D. Mu-opioid Receptor (MOR) Biased Agonists Induce Biphasic Dose-dependent Hyperalgesia and Analgesia, and Hyperalgesic Priming in the Rat. Neuroscience 2018, 394, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Araldi, D.; Ferrari, L.F.; Levine, J.D. Repeated Mu-Opioid Exposure Induces a Novel Form of the Hyperalgesic Priming Model for Transition to Chronic Pain. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 12502–12517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Clayton, C.C.; Bruchas, M.R.; Lee, M.L.; Chavkin, C. Phosphorylation of the mu-opioid receptor at tyrosine 166 (Tyr3.51) in the DRY motif reduces agonist efficacy. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 77, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Allouche, S.; Noble, F.; Marie, N. Opioid receptor desensitization: Mechanisms and its link to tolerance. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 5, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tang, Y.; Ye, M.; Du, Y.; Qiu, X.; Lv, X.; Yang, W.; Luo, J. EGFR signaling upregulates surface expression of the GluN2B-containing NMDA receptor and contributes to long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 2015, 304, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Michailidis, I.E.; Helton, T.D.; Petrou, V.I.; Mirshahi, T.; Ehlers, M.D.; Logothetis, D.E. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate regulates NMDA receptor activity through alpha-actinin. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 5523–5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Jin, D.; Chen, S.R.; Pan, H.L. NMDA Receptors at Primary Afferent-Excitatory Neuron Synapses Differentially Sustain Chemotherapy- and Nerve Trauma-Induced Chronic Pain. J. Neurosci. 2023, 43, 3933–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chen, Y.; Chen, S.R.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Pan, H.L. Increased alpha2delta-1-NMDA receptor coupling potentiates glutamatergic input to spinal dorsal horn neurons in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. J. Neurochem. 2019, 148, 252–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, J.; Li, L.; Chen, S.R.; Chen, H.; Xie, J.D.; Sirrieh, R.E.; MacLean, D.M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M.H.; Jayaraman, V.; et al. The alpha2delta-1-NMDA Receptor Complex Is Critically Involved in Neuropathic Pain Development and Gabapentin Therapeutic Actions. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 2307–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, H.Y.; Chen, S.R.; Pan, H.L. Targeting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors for treatment of neuropathic pain. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011, 4, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Deng, M.; Chen, S.R.; Chen, H.; Luo, Y.; Dong, Y.; Pan, H.L. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling mediates opioid-induced presynaptic NMDA receptor activation and analgesic tolerance. J. Neurochem. 2019, 148, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ikemoto, M.J.; Inoue, K.; Akiduki, S.; Osugi, T.; Imamura, T.; Ishida, N.; Ohtomi, M. Identification of addicsin/GTRAP3-18 as a chronic morphine-augmented gene in amygdala. Neuroreport 2002, 13, 2079–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Xu, T.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Q.; Xue, Y.; Wang, L.; Bil De Arce, V.J.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, W. Antisense oligonucleotide knockdown of mGlu(5) receptor attenuates the antinociceptive tolerance and up-regulated expression of spinal protein kinase C associated with chronic morphine treatment. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 683, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; Xu, H.; Ma, X.; Jiang, W.; Xu, T. Inhibitory effect of spinal mGlu(5) receptor antisense oligonucleotide on the up-regulated expression of spinal G protein associated with chronic morphine treatment. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 723, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Gledhill, L.J.; Babey, A.M. Synthesis of the Mechanisms of Opioid Tolerance: Do We Still Say NO? Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 41, 927–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Garzon, J.; Rodriguez-Munoz, M.; Sanchez-Blazquez, P. Direct association of Mu-opioid and NMDA glutamate receptors supports their cross-regulation: Molecular implications for opioid tolerance. Curr. Drug Abuse Rev. 2012, 5, 199–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sanchez-Blazquez, P.; Rodriguez-Munoz, M.; Berrocoso, E.; Garzon, J. The plasticity of the association between mu-opioid receptor and glutamate ionotropic receptor N in opioid analgesic tolerance and neuropathic pain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 716, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Suina, K.; Tsuchihashi, K.; Yamasaki, J.; Kamenori, S.; Shintani, S.; Hirata, Y.; Okazaki, S.; Sampetrean, O.; Baba, E.; Akashi, K.; et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor promotes glioma progression by regulating xCT and GluN2B-containing N-methyl-d-aspartate-sensitive glutamate receptor signaling. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 3874–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Oyagi, A.; Oida, Y.; Kakefuda, K.; Shimazawa, M.; Shioda, N.; Moriguchi, S.; Kitaichi, K.; Nanba, D.; Yamaguchi, K.; Furuta, Y.; et al. Generation and characterization of conditional heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor knockout mice. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Garcia Campelo, M.R.; Zhou, C.; Ramalingam, S.S.; Lin, H.M.; Kim, T.M.; Riely, G.J.; Mekhail, T.; Nguyen, D.; Goodman, E.; Mehta, M.; et al. Mobocertinib (TAK-788) in EGFR Exon 20 Insertion+ Metastatic NSCLC: Patient-Reported Outcomes from EXCLAIM Extension Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 12, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rekowska, A.; Rola, P.; Wojcik-Superczynska, M.; Chmielewska, I.; Krawczyk, P.; Milanowski, J. Efficacy of Osimertinib in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with EGFR Gene Mutation-Case Report and a Literature Review. Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29, 3531–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yue, L.; Wentao, L.; Xin, Z.; Jingjing, H.; Xiaoyan, Z.; Na, F.; Tonghui, M.; Dalin, L. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer with novel epidermal growth factor receptor -ZNF880 fusion and epidermal growth factor receptor E114K mutations effectively treated with pyrotinib: A case report. Medicine 2020, 99, e23406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Liu, Q.X.; Wei, J.G.; Chen, Y.Y.; Wang, J.F. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in EGFR-mutant squamous cell lung cancer with PD-L1 over-expression: A case report. Medicine 2022, 101, e30099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Turner, N.C.; Oliveira, M.; Howell, S.J.; Dalenc, F.; Cortes, J.; Gomez Moreno, H.L.; Hu, X.; Jhaveri, K.; Krivorotko, P.; Loibl, S.; et al. Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 2058–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Watanabe, J.; Muro, K.; Shitara, K.; Yamazaki, K.; Shiozawa, M.; Ohori, H.; Takashima, A.; Yokota, M.; Makiyama, A.; Akazawa, N.; et al. Panitumumab vs. Bevacizumab Added to Standard First-line Chemotherapy and Overall Survival among Patients with RAS Wild-type, Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023, 329, 1271–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Liam, C.K.; Ahmad, A.R.; Hsia, T.C.; Zhou, J.; Kim, D.W.; Soo, R.A.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, S.; Shin, S.W.; Yang, J.C.; et al. Randomized Trial of Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib versus Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC with EGFR Inhibitor Resistance Due to MET Amplification: INSIGHT Final Analysis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023, 29, 1879–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. He, J.; Ma, P.; Zhao, D.; Shi, X.; Guo, R.; Gao, W.; Shu, Y. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of SH-1028 in EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A dose-escalation phase 1 study. Cancer 2023, 129, 1513–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Qi, W.; Xi, D.; Bai, Y.; Liu, L.; Ma, Y.; Yin, Z.; Chen, H. Case Report: Chemotherapy-free treatment with camrelizumab and anlotinib for elderly patients with KRAS and TP53 mutated advanced lung cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1026135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Dal Lago, L.; Uwimana, A.L.; Coens, C.; Vuylsteke, P.; Curigliano, G.; Brouwers, B.; Jagiello-Gruszfeld, A.; Altintas, S.; Tryfonidis, K.; Poncet, C.; et al. Health-related quality of life in older patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: Comparing pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with or without metronomic chemotherapy in a randomised open-label phase II clinical trial. J. Geriatr. Oncol. 2022, 13, 582–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, H.; Jia, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y. Meclofenamic Acid Restores Gefinitib Sensitivity by Downregulating Breast Cancer Resistance Protein and Multidrug Resistance Protein 7 via FTO/m6A-Demethylation/c-Myc in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 870636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Royce, M.; Osgood, C.L.; Amatya, A.K.; Fiero, M.H.; Chang, C.J.G.; Ricks, T.K.; Shetty, K.A.; Kraft, J.; Qiu, J.; Song, P.; et al. FDA Approval Summary: Margetuximab plus Chemotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zhao, F.; Li, S.W.; Zhang, S.; Li, P.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, X.B.; Wang, C.H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, P.N. Phase II trial of icotinib in adult patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and progressive vestibular schwannoma. J. Neurosurg. 2022, 1, jns22699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceuticals 16 01558 g001
Figure 1. EGFR signaling pathways and downstream effects. When EGFR interacts with high- or low-affinity ligands, resultant conformational changes lead to homo- or heterodimerization and subsequent activation by phosphorylation. This stimulates one or more signaling pathways, which lead to carcinogenesis and pain and may induce opioid tolerance. Furthermore, EGFR leads to the activation of receptors (TRPV1: transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1) and kinases (GRK: G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2) that are involved in pain and opioid receptor regulation. ADAM17: ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17; EGF: epidermal growth factor, BTC: betacellulin, HB-EGF: heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor, TGFα: transforming growth factor alpha, AREG: amphiregulin, EREG: epiregulin, EPGN: epithelial mitogen, EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, MEK: mitogen-activated protein kinase, ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase, PLCγ: phospholipase C gamma, JAK2: Janus kinase 2, Src: Src-family kinase, STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase, mTORC: mammalian target of rapamycin complex, MMP9: matrix metalloproteinase-9. P: phosphorylation. This figure was generated using Biorender.com.
Figure 1. EGFR signaling pathways and downstream effects. When EGFR interacts with high- or low-affinity ligands, resultant conformational changes lead to homo- or heterodimerization and subsequent activation by phosphorylation. This stimulates one or more signaling pathways, which lead to carcinogenesis and pain and may induce opioid tolerance. Furthermore, EGFR leads to the activation of receptors (TRPV1: transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1) and kinases (GRK: G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2) that are involved in pain and opioid receptor regulation. ADAM17: ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17; EGF: epidermal growth factor, BTC: betacellulin, HB-EGF: heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor, TGFα: transforming growth factor alpha, AREG: amphiregulin, EREG: epiregulin, EPGN: epithelial mitogen, EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, MEK: mitogen-activated protein kinase, ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase, PLCγ: phospholipase C gamma, JAK2: Janus kinase 2, Src: Src-family kinase, STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase, mTORC: mammalian target of rapamycin complex, MMP9: matrix metalloproteinase-9. P: phosphorylation. This figure was generated using Biorender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01558 g001
Pharmaceuticals 16 01558 g002
Figure 2. Pathways of morphine tolerance potentially regulated by EGFR and MOR interactions. (A) EGFR activation due to its phosphorylation (P), generates pre-tolerance by interacting with MOR-activated by acute morphine administration. This leads to MOR lysosomal degradation via β-arrestin association, a subsequent impediment to interact with GPCR (comprised by α, β and γ subunits), and finally, hyperalgesia and tolerance. (B) Chronic morphine administration blocks the interaction between MOR and GPCR and activates EGFR. Subsequently, EGFR undergoes retrograde translocation to the ER, resulting in the trafficking of CRT (Calreticulin) to the Golgi before migrating again to the membrane and finally couples to MOR. This coupling leads to the activation of the AC5/cAMP/PKA signaling cascade, generating the release of higher concentrations of Ca2+ and Na+ within synaptoneurosome, which contribute to the development of tolerance and hyperalgesia. (C) MOR’s chronic stimulation by morphine leads to PGE2 activation of EP receptor, which, together with EGFR’s transactivation, activates Src/FAK/MAPK signaling, a pathway well known for hyperalgesia. (D) EGFR activation triggers the p-ERK1/2/MAPK pathway, which activates microglia at the CNS. Activated microglia release cytokines that act on MOR chronic morphine-stimulated, leading to the activation of AC5/cAMP/PKA signaling cascade and the release of Ca2+ and Na+. The following abbreviations have been used: EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; GPCR: G protein-coupled receptors; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; CRT: calreticulin; AC5: adenylyl cyclase 5; cAMP: adenosine monophosphate; PKA: protein kinase A; PGE2: prostaglandin E2; EP: prostaglandin E receptor; Src: Src-family kinase; FAK: focal adhesion kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; p-ERK1/2: extracellular signal-related kinase. Own figure created using BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Pathways of morphine tolerance potentially regulated by EGFR and MOR interactions. (A) EGFR activation due to its phosphorylation (P), generates pre-tolerance by interacting with MOR-activated by acute morphine administration. This leads to MOR lysosomal degradation via β-arrestin association, a subsequent impediment to interact with GPCR (comprised by α, β and γ subunits), and finally, hyperalgesia and tolerance. (B) Chronic morphine administration blocks the interaction between MOR and GPCR and activates EGFR. Subsequently, EGFR undergoes retrograde translocation to the ER, resulting in the trafficking of CRT (Calreticulin) to the Golgi before migrating again to the membrane and finally couples to MOR. This coupling leads to the activation of the AC5/cAMP/PKA signaling cascade, generating the release of higher concentrations of Ca2+ and Na+ within synaptoneurosome, which contribute to the development of tolerance and hyperalgesia. (C) MOR’s chronic stimulation by morphine leads to PGE2 activation of EP receptor, which, together with EGFR’s transactivation, activates Src/FAK/MAPK signaling, a pathway well known for hyperalgesia. (D) EGFR activation triggers the p-ERK1/2/MAPK pathway, which activates microglia at the CNS. Activated microglia release cytokines that act on MOR chronic morphine-stimulated, leading to the activation of AC5/cAMP/PKA signaling cascade and the release of Ca2+ and Na+. The following abbreviations have been used: EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; GPCR: G protein-coupled receptors; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; CRT: calreticulin; AC5: adenylyl cyclase 5; cAMP: adenosine monophosphate; PKA: protein kinase A; PGE2: prostaglandin E2; EP: prostaglandin E receptor; Src: Src-family kinase; FAK: focal adhesion kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; p-ERK1/2: extracellular signal-related kinase. Own figure created using BioRender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01558 g002
Pharmaceuticals 16 01558 g003
Figure 3. Potential mechanism of morphine tolerance regulated by EGFR and NMDAR interactions (P:phosphorylation).
Figure 3. Potential mechanism of morphine tolerance regulated by EGFR and NMDAR interactions (P:phosphorylation).
Pharmaceuticals 16 01558 g003
Table 2. EGFR involvement in morphine tolerance and pre-tolerance in animal models.
Table 2. EGFR involvement in morphine tolerance and pre-tolerance in animal models.
Animal Models EGFR ActivationEGFR InhibitionRef.
Induced byBehavioral OutcomesInduced byBehavioral Outcomes
i.t. morphineRatEGF
(4 days)		Production of pre-tolerance and thermal hypersensitivity [25]
Lumbar spinal nerve ligation Morphine (i.t. or subcutaneous)Rat Gefitinib (i.t. or subcutaneous)Reversal of tolerance mechanical allodynia and thermal hypersensitivity[25]
EGF-scavenging molecule (i.t.) Reversal of tolerance and mechanical allodynia
Injecting Walker 256 mammary gland carcinoma cells into tibias + morphine (i.t.)Rat AG 1478 (i.t.) Reversal of tolerance and mechanical allodynia[94]
Note: i.t.: intrathecal.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santi, M.D.; Zhang, M.; Liu, N.; Viet, C.T.; Xie, T.; Jensen, D.D.; Amit, M.; Pan, H.; Ye, Y. Repurposing EGFR Inhibitors for Oral Cancer Pain and Opioid Tolerance. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111558

AMA Style

Santi MD, Zhang M, Liu N, Viet CT, Xie T, Jensen DD, Amit M, Pan H, Ye Y. Repurposing EGFR Inhibitors for Oral Cancer Pain and Opioid Tolerance. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(11):1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santi, Maria Daniela, Morgan Zhang, Naijiang Liu, Chi T. Viet, Tongxin Xie, Dane D. Jensen, Moran Amit, Huilin Pan, and Yi Ye. 2023. "Repurposing EGFR Inhibitors for Oral Cancer Pain and Opioid Tolerance" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 11: 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop