Next Article in Journal
Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies in Raw Milk and Sera of Cows in China
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Searching Single Nucleotide-Polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNPs-Targeting a Multiplex Primer for Identification of Common Salmonella Serotypes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lineages, Virulence Gene Associated and Integrons among Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) and CMY-2 Producing Enterobacteriaceae from Bovine Mastitis, in Tunisia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/pathogens11101077
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Beta-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from Landfill Leachates

by
Alejandra Mondragón-Quiguanas
1,
Miguel Ángel Villaquirán-Muriel
1,
Sandra Patricia Rivera
1,2,
Doris Rosero-García
1,
Carlos Aranaga
3,
Adriana Correa
1,4 and
Aura Falco
1,*
1
Universidad Santiago de Cali, Grupo de Investigación en Microbiología, Industria y Ambiente (GIMIA), Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Cali 760035, Colombia
2
Laboratorio de Salud Pública Departamental, Secretaria Departamental de Salud del Valle del Cauca, Gobernación del Valle del Cauca, Cali 760045, Colombia
3
Universidad Santiago de Cali, Grupo de Investigación en Química y Biotecnología (QUIBIO), Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Cali 760035, Colombia
4
Clínica Imbanaco, Cali 760042, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(10), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101077
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 24 August 2022 / Published: 22 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamics and Molecular Features of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales Lineages in Global Dissemination in a One Health Context (Humans, Animals, and Environment))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antibiotic resistance is one of the main challenges worldwide due to the high morbidity and mortality caused by infections produced by resistant bacteria. In Colombia, this problem has been studied mainly from the clinical perspective; however, it is scarcely studied in the leachates produced in landfills. The objective of this study was to detect, identify and determine the antibiotic sensitivity profile of Enterobacterales isolated from a leachate treatment plant located in Cali, Colombia. Detection was performed using selective culture media, bacterial identification using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time-Of-Flight (MALDI-TOF, bioMérieux) and by sequencing the gene coding for the 16S ribosomal RNA subunit when discrepancies were observed between phenotypic characteristics and MALDI-TOF. Antibiotic sensitivity profiling was determined using the automated VITEK®2 system (bioMérieux). Twenty-one isolates were obtained, of which Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequent (23.8%), and 34% of the isolates showed decreased sensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics such as cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam. These findings suggest that leachates from landfills could be a reservoir of pathogenic bacteria carrying antibiotic resistance determinants, so periodic microbiological characterization of these effluents should be performed, promoting the One Health approach.

1. Introduction

A landfill is a space designed for final garbage disposal [1]. According to a World Bank report, in 2050 the global amount of deposits in landfills is estimated to exceed 350 million tons per year, driven by the rapid urbanization and population growth [2]. Navarro landfill was the site for final municipal solid waste disposal in the city of Santiago de Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, for 40 years, and was closed in 2008 [3] due to the pollution of the Cauca River (from which 75% of the Cali population is supplied with drinking water through the treatment plant) and the subsoil, and due to natural fires on landfill grounds [4]. A large volume of leachates has been produced after the closure of the former Navarro landfill (AVN, in Spanish), representing a pollution hazard to soil and surrounding groundwater. As a result, a Leachate Treatment Plant (LTP) was built [3]. Landfill leachates result from the percolation of fluids through a solid and generally carry large amounts of the compounds present in that solid [5]. Landfills receive solid household waste, feces and clinical waste, among others. This stockpile generates a large volume of leachates with traces of antibiotics, turning this liquid into a potential reservoir of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [6].
According to the “One Health” approach, there is a connection between human, animal and environmental health, and it indicates that one of the most relevant areas of work is bacterial resistance to antibiotics [7]. Precisely, leachates can cause problems in human, animal and environmental health because they are known to contain numerous antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [8,9,10,11], as reported by Wu et al., who detected twenty (20) antibiotics and six (6) resistance genes (sul1, sul2, tetQ, tetM, ermB and mefA) in leachates from a landfill in Shanghai, China [12]. These genes were also reported by Liu et al. in leachates from Zhejiang Province, China [13]. In addition, mobile genetic elements (MGE), such as plasmids, transposons and integrons have been identified [14,15,16]. According to Arenas and Melo, bodies of water that contain organic loads could act as important antibiotic-resistant bacteria reservoirs because they favor optimal conditions in terms of humidity, pH, temperature, and nutrient availability [11].
All the above underlines the need to improve our understanding of how antibiotic resistance develops and spreads in humans, animals, and the environment [17]. Although in Colombia these types of reports have focused mainly on the clinical perspective [18] because of a direct relationship between them, in the country there have also been studies of bacterial resistance to antibiotics in rivers and wastewater [19,20], in wastewater treatment plants [21,22,23] and in drinking water [24]. However, there are no studies that have characterized bacteria from landfill leachates and their association with antibiotic resistance. Consequently, the objective of this study was to detect, identify and determine the antibiotic sensitivity profile of Enterobacterales isolated from a leachate treatment plant located in Cali, Colombia.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation of Enterobacterales

Among a total of thirty (30) isolates grown in Chromocult® [25], twenty-one (21) were selected. Their colonies showed coliform phenotype. Two of them had a blue coloring corresponding to Escherichia coli (fecal coliform), and the remaining nineteen had a pink coloring, which is associated with total coliforms. The remaining nine colonies had a colorless tone; they were presumably Pseudomonas [25], which is why they were not included in this study.

2.2. Bacterial Identification

Of the twenty-one isolates that were grown on MacConkey agar, 86% (n = 18/21) were found to have a lactose-fermenting phenotype. Klebsiella pneumoniae had a frequency of 23.8%, followed by Citrobacter amalonaticus (19%) (Figure 1). The following Gram-negative bacteria were also identified: Providencia rettgeri, Klebsiella aerogenes, E. coli and Citrobacter braaki with frequencies of 9.5% each. Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae complex and Citrobacter koseri had frequencies of 4.8% each (Figure 1).
The identification of one (1) species belonging to the E. cloacae complex yielded a 50% confidence level using MALDI-TOF MS. To confirm this match, further identification was performed by 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequencing. The isolate showed 99.8% identity with Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. ludwigi.

2.3. Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile Determination

Sixty-six percent (66%, n = 14/21) of the isolates were sensitive to the antibiotics tested (beta-lactams: ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, doripenem, ertapenem and meropenem; aminoglycosides: amikacin and gentamicin; ciprofloxacin; and tigecycline), and 34% (n = 7/21) presented an intermediate phenotype and/or resistance to beta-lactams (Figure 2).
In general, decreased sensitivity to ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam and cefoxitin was observed in seven isolates (Table 1). Regarding the group of beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics, decreased sensitivity was observed for ampicillin/sulbactam in isolates Kp2, Kp4 and Pr19; for piperacillin/tazobactam, this was observed in isolates Ka1, Cb2 and Ec1. As for cephamycins, decreased susceptibility to cefoxitin was observed in isolates Ka1, Ka2 and Pr19 (Table 1). Four (n = 4/7) of the isolates with intermediate resistance and/or resistance to beta-lactams belonged to the genus Klebsiella, and the remaining belonged to the genera Escherichia, Providencia and Citrobacter, with one isolate each (n = 1/7).

3. Discussion

The transmission routes of Antimicrobial Resistance (AR) are partially known because investigations are predominantly focused on hospital settings, especially the urban setting [26]. However, little is known about the spread of AR in non-clinical settings, especially in Latin America. Due to this, studies have been conducted in which ARGs have been detected worldwide and in various non-clinical settings, including sediments [27,28], activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants [29,30], pig farms [31] and the soil adjacent to them [32], but not in leachates. For this reason, this study describes the resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Enterobacterales isolated from leachates produced in a treatment plant located in Cali, Colombia, because this group of microorganisms plays an important role in the propagation of antibiotic resistance genes [33].
Historically, unused, or fully consumed antibiotics inevitably end up in landfills through household waste due to the lack of regulation for their disposal [10]. An example of this is that sulfonamides have been detected in landfill leachates both in the state of Florida in the United States [34] and in China [35]. The selective pressure exerted by these drugs on bacteria contributes to their prevalence in landfills and leachates, making them reservoirs [10]. The main concern about leachates produced from landfills is their impact on the surrounding surface and groundwater because, although they have geomembranes, if these are affected by fires or the presence of animals, the environmental impact could be severe [36]. However, there are few studies on ARB in landfill leachates. Threedeach et al. found that E. coli isolates from landfill leachates showed resistance to two groups of antibiotics, tetracyclines (37.5–68.8%) and beta-lactams (cephalothin, 57.5–61.3%) [10,37].
In this work we performed a descriptive study, with purposeful sampling via selective and differential culture methods that allowed the selection of Enterobacterales from a leachate sample. Regarding bacterial identification, our results indicate that K. pneumoniae (23.8%, n = 5/21) and C. amalonaticus (19%, n = 4/21) are the predominant species (Figure 1); and E. coli and E. cloacae complex have frequencies of 9.5% and 4.8%, respectively (Figure 1). A study by Obire and Guda (2002) [38] demonstrated the presence of species belonging to the genera Klebsiella, Citrobacter, Escherichia and Enterobacter in leachates from a landfill in Nigeria, which is consistent with the results found in this study. Although species belonging to these genera have been associated with fecal contamination [39], their presence in highly complex matrices such as leachates is [40] mainly associated with their ability to tolerate and bioremediate heavy-metal-contaminated environments [41,42,43,44,45,46].
Regarding the antibiotic sensitivity profiles, our results indicate that 34% of the isolates showed decreased sensitivity to at least one of the beta-lactam antibiotics tested in this study (Table 1). Beta-lactams are broad-spectrum antibiotics used to treat infections caused by Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [47]. The antibiotic piperacillin/tazobactam is a combination of a beta-lactam and a beta-lactamase inhibitor and is widely used in clinical practice. Isolates of E. coli (Eco1), K. aerogenes (Ka1) and C. braaki (Cb2) species showed resistance to this antibiotic. This resistance may be due to hyperproduction of constitutive chromosomal beta-lactamases such as AmpC [48]. Resistance to this class of antibiotics has also led to the development of inhibitor-resistant (IR) variants, including the TEM and SHV beta-lactamase enzyme families [49]. However, it was a limitation of the study not to be able to detect the genes involved in resistance to these antibiotics.
Bacteria of the genus Klebsiella often cause hospital and community acquired urinary tract infections, pneumonia, surgical wound infections, and life-threatening infections, such as endocarditis and septicemia [50]. This bacterial genus has been isolated from landfill leachate samples in Ghana and presented resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, such as cefuroxime [51]. However, they did not evaluate carbapenems, which are also beta-lactam antibiotics. This study also reports that the genus Klebsiella was sensitive to aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin) and quinolones (ciprofloxacin) (Table 1). This is consistent with the results obtained in this study for the genus Klebsiella isolates, which also presented sensitivity to gentamicin and resistance and intermediate resistance to amikacin [52].
A K. aerogenes isolate (Ka2) presented sensitivity to ertapenem and resistance to imipenem, which is rare (Table 1). This phenotype might be associated with changes in the outer membrane permeability and overexpression of AmpC-type beta-lactamases and efflux pumps, as previously reported [52,53]. Further studies are required to confirm this phenotype. Imipenem is one of the antimicrobial choices for empirical treatment of infections suspected to be caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or AmpC-producing bacteria, which develop resistance to third generation cephalosporins. Imipenem is also used in patients who have been previously treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics due to the possibility of having selected multi-resistant strains [54]. Resistance to these antibiotics is regarded as a global public health problem because carbapenems are used as last-line antibiotics—that is, the ones used against bacteria that show resistance to all other antibiotics.
According to the sensitivity profiles of the rest of the isolates, Kp2, Kp4 and Pr1, it is suggested that the beta-lactam resistance was due to IR production, which should be verified with extra experiments such as specific PCRs for the pre-subject genes involved and/or whole genome sequencing.
The LTP was designed to contain and treat chemical and biological pollutants from the old Navarro landfill. This plant operates by collecting the leachates at the pumping station, from which they are transported and stored in eight lagoons (covered and uncovered) with and without physicochemical treatment. Each lagoon has a geomembrane that isolates it from the surrounding soil and constitutes a complex ecosystem in which various pollutants coexist. This study demonstrated the presence of antibiotic resistant Enterobacterales that are potentially pathogenic for both animals and humans in the leachate from the LTP pumping station. These results emphasize the importance of the LTP in reducing microbiological risks that could pollute both the soil and nearby groundwater, which in turn could cause disease outbreaks mainly in the community of Navarro. However, constant monitoring of the microbiomes of the different stations is necessary, since the presence of contaminants such as antibiotics and heavy metals, among others, expose microorganisms to various selective pressures. This has repercussions for the dynamics and genetics of the bacterial community which, through the horizontal transfer of genetic material, could turn this ecosystem into a potential reservoir for the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [14]. Additionally, during the storage of leachates in the lagoons, nearby animals such as birds and rodents, could have contact with leachate bacteria, increasing the risk of zoonotic events, since a large part of the population of Navarro is dedicated to sugar cane agriculture [55]. In line with the present study, opportunistic bacteria were isolated from leachates in the San Nicolás landfill in México [56]. Therefore, it is important to perform frequent surveillance in these environments because if these leachates are not adequately treated, they can impact not only public health (human and animal), but also environmental health.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Collection of Samples

This was a descriptive study, with purposeful sampling in selective and differential culture media that allowed the selection of Enterobacterales from a sample of leachates collected at a LPT in the town of Navarro (3°23′13.8″ N 76°29′7.5″ W), 2.2 miles from the city of Santiago de Cali. The treatment plant consists of a Pumping Station (PS), from which the sample was taken, which distributes the leachate from the landfill to eight lagoons, five of which are treated by physicochemical methods, and remaining three are untreated (Figure 3). The sample was collected in March 2019.

4.2. Isolation of Enterobacterales

From the landfill leachate sample, two aliquots of 100 mL were collected using a sterile 500 mL glass vial and then filtered through a 0.45 µm cellulose ester membrane (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using a vacuum filtration equipment (Merck Millipore, Germany). Each filter was transferred to Chromocult Agar® (Merck Millipore, Germany) [25], and MacConkey Agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The plates were incubated for 18–20 h at 37 °C. Colonies of presumptive Enterobacterales were picked up from the plates and restraeked on Soy Trypticase Agar (STA) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates to obtain pure cultures.

4.3. Bacteria Identification

All isolates were grown for 18–20 h in STA for identification by MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK®MS bioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
When the confidence level obtained with MALDI-TOF MS was less than 80%, the isolate was identified using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequencing. For this, the bacterial strain was grown on Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) (Oxoid, UK) and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. Then, 200 µL of the culture were added to 800 µL of distilled water and boiled for 10 min. The bacterial suspension was then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was used for PCR. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using primers U1 and U2, previously described in [57], and PCR 100 2X Master Mix (CorpoGen, OPTBM-00006, Bogotá, Colombia). After PCR amplification, fragments were purified with Qiaquick PCR Spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced in both forward and reverse directions (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea) with the same primers used for PCR amplification. The sequences were compared with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 21 April 2022)) and The Ribosomal Database Project (https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ ( accessed on 21 April 2022)).

4.4. Determination of Antibiotic Sensitivity Profiles

The determination of the antibiotic sensitivity profiles of the bacterial isolates was performed using the automated system VITEK®2 (bioMérioux, Durham, NC, USA), using the VITEK® N272-AST card (reference 414164, bioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA), following the manufacturer’s recommendations.

5. Conclusions

In this study, potentially pathogenic species for humans and animals belonging to the order Enterobacterales were isolated, with K. pneumoniae being the most prevalent bacterium (23.8%), followed by Citrobacter amalonaticus (19%). Although there was a low frequency of beta-lactam-resistant bacteria and no multidrug-resistant isolates were detected, they could act as a reservoir of resistance genes in leachates and are therefore considered a public health and environmental concern. Therefore, research on ARs in landfills and landfill leachates is essential to better understand the mechanism of transport and distribution of ARs in the environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study of antibiotic resistance in leachates in Colombia, which is why the findings obtained could be useful for policy makers on this critical issue in the country.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.-Q., M.Á.V.-M., A.C. and A.F.; methodology, A.M.-Q., M.Á.V.-M., S.P.R., A.C. and A.F.; formal analysis, A.M.-Q., M.Á.V.-M., A.C., C.A. and A.F.; research, A.M.-Q., M.Á.V.-M., S.P.R., A.C. and A.F.; resources, D.R.-G., S.P.R., A.C. and A.F.; data curation, A.F. and C.A.; writing—preparation of original draft, A.M.-Q. and M.Á.V.-M.; writing—proofreading and editing, A.F. and C.A.; supervision, A.F. and A.C.; project management, A.F.; financial acquisition, A.F. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Dirección General de Investigación, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Colombia, under grant number 934-621119-E04 and, under call No. 01-2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Empresa de Servicio Público de Aseo de Cali en Liquidación (EMSIRVA E.S.P.) for authorizing the entry to the former Navarro landfill for sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García, P.E.E. Efficiency and Reliability of Theoretical Models of Biogas for Landfills. Granja 2019, 29, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, Urban Development. Available online: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0 (accessed on 26 May 2021).
  3. Chiquito, G.; Fernanda, P. Manejo y Tratamiento de Lixiviados en Rellenos Sanitarios: Revisión bibliográfica y Experiencia en Planta de Tratamiento de Lixiviados de Navarro. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Colombia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Del Moro, G.; Prieto-Rodríguez, L.; de Sanctis, M.; di Iaconi, C.; Malato, S.; Mascolo, G. Landfill Leachate Treatment: Comparison of Standalone Electrochemical Degradation and Combined with a Novel Biofilter. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roy, D.; Azaïs, A.; Benkaraache, S.; Drogui, P.; Tyagi, R.D. Composting Leachate: Characterization, Treatment, and Future Perspectives. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 17, 323–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Q.L.; Li, H.; Zhou, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Su, J.Q.; Zhang, X.; Huang, F.Y. An Underappreciated Hotspot of Antibiotic Resistance: The Groundwater near the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 966–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; World Health Organization. Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe; EU Publications: Luxembourg, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anand, U.; Reddy, B.; Singh, V.K.; Singh, A.K.; Kesari, K.K.; Tripathi, P.; Kumar, P.; Tripathi, V.; Simal-Gandara, J. Potential Environmental and Human Health Risks Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (ARB), Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) and Emerging Contaminants (ECs) from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfill. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Garcete, L.A.A.; Martinez, J.E.R.; Barrera, D.B.V.; Bonugli-Santos, R.C.; Passarini, M.R.Z. Biotechnological Potential of Microorganisms from Landfill Leachate: Isolation, Antibiotic Resistance and Leachate Discoloration. An. Acad. Bras. Ciên. 2022, 94, e20210642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Tang, W.; Qiao, J.; Song, L. Occurrence and Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Landfill Leachate. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 12525–12533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fang, C.; Chen, B.; Zhuang, H.; Mao, H. Antibiotics in Leachates from Landfills in Northern Zhejiang Province, China. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 105, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, D.; Huang, Z.; Yang, K.; Graham, D.; Xie, B. Relationships between Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Gene Levels in Municipal Solid Waste Leachates in Shanghai, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 4122–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, H.; Li, H.; Qiu, L.; Chen, B.; Wang, H.; Fang, C.; Long, Y.; Hu, L. The Panorama of Antibiotics and the Related Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in Landfill Leachate. Waste Manag. 2022, 144, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, Z.; He, P.; Shao, L.; Zhang, H.; Lü, F. Co-Occurrence of Mobile Genetic Elements and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Leachates: A Preliminary Insight into the Role of Landfill Age. Water Res. 2016, 106, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, J.Y.; An, X.L.; Huang, F.Y.; Su, J.Q. Antibiotic Resistome in a Landfill Leachate Treatment Plant and Effluent-Receiving River. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, D.; Wang, L.; Su, Y.; Dolfing, J.; Xie, B. Associations between Human Bacterial Pathogens and ARGs Are Magnified in Leachates as Landfill Ages. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thamlikitkul, V.; Tiengrim, S.; Thamthaweechok, N.; Buranapakdee, P.; Chiemchaisri, W. Contamination by Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Selected Environments in Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Villegas, M.V.; Correa, A.; Perez, F.; Miranda, M.C.; Zuluaga, T.; Quinn, J.P. Prevalence and Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli Isolates from Colombian Hospitals. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 49, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chaávez, M.C.; Caicedo, L.D.; Castillo, J.E. Occurrence of β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates in Water Sources in Cali City, Colombia. Int. J. Microbiol. 2019, 2019, 1375060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chávez, M.; Cabezas, A.F.; Ferauds, M.; Caicedo, L.D. Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Genotypic Diversity between Clinical and Water Systems Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cali, Colombia. Trop. Biomed. 2020, 37, 650–662. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodríguez, E.A.; Garzón, L.M.; Gómez, I.D.; Jiménez, J.N. Multidrug Resistance and Diversity of Resistance Profiles in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli throughout a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Colombia. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodríguez, E.A.; Aristizábal-Hoyos, A.M.; Morales-Zapata, S.; Arias, L.; Jiménez, J.N. High Frequency of Gram-Negative Bacilli Harboring BlaKPC-2 in the Different Stages of Wastewater Treatment Plant: A Successful Mechanism of Resistance to Carbapenems Outside the Hospital Settings. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 111046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodríguez, E.A.; Ramirez, D.; Balcázar, J.L.; Jiménez, J.N. Metagenomic Analysis of Urban Wastewater Resistome and Mobilome: A Support for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in an Endemic Country. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 276, 116736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dávalos, A.F.; Garcia, P.K.; Montoya-Pachongo, C.; Rengifo, A.; Guerrero, D.; Díaz-Ordoñez, L.; Díaz, G.; Ferro, B.E. Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Drinking Water in Cali, Colombia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Finney, M.; Smullen, J.; Foster, H.A.; Brokx, S.; Storey, D.M. Evaluation of Chromocult Coliform Agar for the Detection and Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae from Faecal Samples from Healthy Subjects. J. Microbiol. Methods 2003, 54, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Medina-Pizzali, M.L.; Hartinger, S.M.; Salmon-Mulanovich, G.; Larson, A.; Riveros, M.; Mäusezahl, D. Antimicrobial Resistance in Rural Settings in Latin America: A Scoping Review with a One Health Lens. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Luo, Y.; Li, T.; Yu, F.; Kramer, T.; Cristea, I.M. Resolving the Composition of Protein Complexes Using a MALDI LTQ Orbitrap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 21, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garcia-Armisen, T.; Vercammen, K.; Passerat, J.; Triest, D.; Servais, P.; Cornelis, P. Antimicrobial Resistance of Heterotrophic Bacteria in Sewage-Contaminated Rivers. Water Res. 2011, 45, 788–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, H.; Zhang, M. Occurrence and Removal of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Municipal Wastewater and Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment Systems in Eastern China. Environ. Int. 2013, 55, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Munir, M.; Wong, K.; Xagoraraki, I. Release of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Genes in the Effluent and Biosolids of Five Wastewater Utilities in Michigan. Water Res. 2011, 45, 681–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Nakhleh, L. Evolution after Whole-Genome Duplication: A Network Perspective. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2013, 3, 2049–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, H.; Zhang, J.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Hu, Z.; Liang, S.; Fan, J.; Liu, H. A Review on the Sustainability of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Design and Operation. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hartinger, S.M.; Medina-Pizzali, M.L.; Salmon-Mulanovich, G.; Larson, A.J.; Pinedo-Bardales, M.; Verastegui, H.; Riberos, M.; Mäusezahl, D. Antimicrobial Resistance in Humans, Animals, Water and Household Environs in Rural Andean Peru: Exploring Dissemination Pathways through the One Health Lens. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Metzger, J.W. Drugs in Municipal Landfills and Landfill Leachates. In Pharmaceuticals in the Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liyan, S.; Youcai, Z.; Weimin, S.; Ziyang, L. Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals (HOCs) Removal from Biologically Treated Landfill Leachate by Powder-Activated Carbon (PAC), Granular-Activated Carbon (GAC) and Biomimetic Fat Cell (BFC). J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 1084–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gameson, A.L.H.; Saxon, J.R. Field Studies on Effect of Daylight on Mortality of Coliform Bacteria; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1967; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  37. Threedeach, S.; Chiemchaisri, W.; Watanabe, T.; Chiemchaisri, C.; Honda, R.; Yamamoto, K. Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Leachates from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Comparison between Semi-Aerobic and Anaerobic Operations. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Obire, O.; Aguda, M. Bacterial Comunnity of Leachate from a Waste–Dump and Adjacent Stream. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2002, 6, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  39. Edberg, S.C.; Rice, E.W.; Karlin, R.J.; Allen, M.J. Escherichia coli: The Best Biological Drinking Water Indicator for Public Health Protection. Symp. Ser. Soc. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 29, 106S–116S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cerdeira, L.; Monte, D.F.M.; Fuga, B.; Sellera, F.P.; Neves, I.; Rodrigues, L.; Landgraf, M.; Lincopan, N. Genomic Insights of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from a Native Amazonian Fish Reveal Wide Resistome against Heavy Metals, Disinfectants, and Clinically Relevant Antibiotics. Genomics 2020, 112, 5143–5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dutta, P.; Karmakar, A.; Majumdar, S.; Roy, S. Klebsiella pneumoniae (HR1) Assisted Alleviation of Cd(II) Toxicity in Vigna mungo: A Case Study of Biosorption of Heavy Metal by an Endophytic Bacterium Coupled with Plant Growth Promotion. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2018, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, S.; Deng, W.; Liu, S.; Yu, X.; Mustafa, G.R.; Chen, S.; He, L.; Ao, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, K.; et al. Presence of Heavy Metal Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella Isolates and Analysis of Resistance Gene Structure in E. coli E308. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 21, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sütterlin, S.; Téllez-Castillo, C.J.; Anselem, L.; Yin, H.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Heavy Metal Susceptibility of Escherichia coli Isolated from Urine Samples from Sweden, Germany, and Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00209-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ture, M.; Altinok, I.; Alp, H. Effects of Cage Farming on Antimicrobial and Heavy Metal Resistance of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactococcus garvieae. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cheng, X.; Sheng, L.; Peng, S.; Thorley, E.; Cao, H.; Li, K. Integrated Mechanism of Heavy Metal Bioremediation from Soil to Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Mediated by Enterococcus faecium. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gomaa, E.Z.; El-Meihy, R.M. Bacterial Biosurfactant from Citrobacter freundii MG812314.1 as a Bioremoval Tool of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Escolà-Vergé, L.; Los-Arcos, I.; Almirante, B. New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms. Med. Clin. 2020, 154, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cantón, R.; Morosini, M.I.; Martin, O.; de La Maza, S.; Gomez, E.; de La Pedrosa, G. IRT and CMT B-Lactamases and Inhibitor Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Schechter, L.M.; Creely, D.P.; Garner, C.D.; Shortridge, D.; Nguyen, H.; Chen, L.; Hanson, B.M.; Sodergren, E.; Weinstock, G.M.; Dunne, W.M.; et al. Extensive Gene Amplification as a Mechanism for Piperacillin-Tazobactam Resistance in Escherichia coli. mBio 2018, 9, e00583-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Navon-Venezia, S.; Kondratyeva, K.; Carattoli, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Major Worldwide Source and Shuttle for Antibiotic Resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 252–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Borquaye, L.S.; Ekuadzi, E.; Darko, G.; Ahor, H.S.; Nsiah, S.T.; Lartey, J.A.; Mutala, A.H.; Boamah, V.E.; Woode, E. Occurrence of Antibiotics and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Landfill Sites in Kumasi, Ghana. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6934507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shin, S.; Jeong, S.H.; Lee, H.; Hong, J.S.; Park, M.J.; Song, W. Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Providencia rettgeri Isolates Co-Producing NDM-1 Carbapenemase and PER-1 Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Causing a First Outbreak in Korea. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2018, 17, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gomi, R.; Matsuda, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Chou, P.H.; Tanaka, M.; Ichiyama, S.; Yoneda, M.; Matsumura, Y. Characteristics of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Wastewater Revealed by Genomic Analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02501-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fresnadillo Martínez, M.J.; García García, M.I.; García Sánchez, E.; García Sánchez, J.E. Los Carbapenems Disponibles: Propiedades y Diferencias. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2010, 28, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rios Castaño Jhon, A.; Vargas Buitron, K. PLAN DE GESTIÓN AMBIENTAL PARA EL MANEJO DE LOS RESIDUOS SÓLIDOS ORDINARIOS ORIENTADO A LA COMUNIDAD ESTUDIANTIL DE LA FUNDACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA CATÓLICA LUMEN GENTIUM SEDE PANCE, DE LA CIUDAD SANTIAGO DE CALI. Bachelor’s Thesis, Fundación Universitaria Católica Lumen Gentium, Facultad De Ciencias Sociales Y Políticas Programa De Trabajo Social, 2017. Available online: https://repository.unicatolica.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12237/528/FUCLG0017414.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  56. Lilián, D.A.; Barrera, G.; Javier, F.; González, A.; Latinoamericana, R.; Flores-Tena, F.J.; Guerrero-Barrera, A.L.; Avelar-González, F.J.; Marcela Ramírez-López, E.; Consolación Martínez-Saldaña, M. Pathogenic and Opportunistic Gram-Negative Bacteria in Soil, Leachate and Air in San Nicolás Landfill at Aguascalientes, Mexico. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol. 2007, 49, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  57. Perng, C.; Lee, S.; Wan, C. Use of PCR with Universal Primers and Restriction Endonuclease Digestions for Detection and Identification of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Cerebrospinal Fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 2076–2080. [Google Scholar]
Pathogens 11 01077 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentages of Enterobacterales identified using MALDI-TOF MS.
Figure 1. Percentages of Enterobacterales identified using MALDI-TOF MS.
Pathogens 11 01077 g001
Pathogens 11 01077 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentages of sensitivity and resistance to antibiotics in the Enterobacterales isolates evaluated.
Figure 2. Percentages of sensitivity and resistance to antibiotics in the Enterobacterales isolates evaluated.
Pathogens 11 01077 g002
Pathogens 11 01077 g003 550
Figure 3. Leachate Treatment Plant (LTP) located in Navarro town, Santiago de Cali municipality (blue dot), Valle del Cauca department (orange), and location of sampling site PS (yellow dot).
Figure 3. Leachate Treatment Plant (LTP) located in Navarro town, Santiago de Cali municipality (blue dot), Valle del Cauca department (orange), and location of sampling site PS (yellow dot).
Pathogens 11 01077 g003
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of strains belonging to Enterobacterales.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of strains belonging to Enterobacterales.
MIC (µg/mL) Per Antibiotic/Interpretative Categories
Strain IDBLEESAM 1TZP 1FOX 2CAZ 3CRO 3FEP 3DOR 4ETP 4IPM 4MEM 4AMK 5GEN 5CIP 6TIG 7
Kp1Negative8 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Kp2Negative16 (I)≤4 (S)8 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Kp3Negative8 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤1 (S)
Kp4Negative≥32 (R)8 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Kp5Negative8 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Ka1Negative4 (S)64 (I)≥64 (R)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Ka2Negative4 (S)≤4 (S)≥64 (R)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)2 (I)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ko1Negative8 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Sm1N/ANR≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Ca1N/AN/A≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ca2N/AN/A≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ca3N/AN/A≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ca4N/AN/A≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Cb1N/AN/A≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Cb2N/AN/A≥128 (R)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ck1N/AN/A≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ec1Negative4 (S)64 (I)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Ec2Negative8 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Pr19N/A≥32 (R)≤4 (S)16 (I)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)N/A≤0.5 (S)1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)NR
Pr20N/A8 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)N/A≤0.5 (S)2 (S)≤0.25 (S)2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)NR
Ecc1N/ANR≤4 (S)NR≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)1 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.25 (S)1 (S)
Ec ATCC 25922≤2 (S)≤4 (S)≤4 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.12 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤0.25 (S)≤2 (S)≤2 (S)≤1 (S)≤0.5 (S)≤0.5 (S)
Abbreviations: MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; BLEE, extended spectrum ß-lactamases; SAM, ampicillin/sulbactam; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; FOX, cefoxitin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; DOR, doripenem; ETP, ertapenem; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; TIG, tigecycline; N/A; not applicable; NR: natural resistance; Kp, K. pneumoniae; Ka, Klebsiella aerogenes; Ko, Klebsiella oxytoca; Sm, Serratia marcescens; Ec, Escherichia coli; Ca, Citrobacter amanolaticus; Cb, Citrobacter braaki; Ck, Citrobacter koseri; Ecc, Enterobacter cloacae complex; Pr, Providencia rettgeri; R (dark grey), resistant; I (light gray), intermediate; S, susceptible; NEG, negative; 1—penicillin + β-lactamase inhibitors; 2—cephamycins; 3—extended-spectrum cephalosporins; 4—carbapenems; 5—aminoglycosides; 6—fluoroquinolones; 7—tetracycline. Shadows highlight bacterial resistance to tested antibiotics.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mondragón-Quiguanas, A.; Villaquirán-Muriel, M.Á.; Rivera, S.P.; Rosero-García, D.; Aranaga, C.; Correa, A.; Falco, A. Beta-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from Landfill Leachates. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101077

AMA Style

Mondragón-Quiguanas A, Villaquirán-Muriel MÁ, Rivera SP, Rosero-García D, Aranaga C, Correa A, Falco A. Beta-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from Landfill Leachates. Pathogens. 2022; 11(10):1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mondragón-Quiguanas, Alejandra, Miguel Ángel Villaquirán-Muriel, Sandra Patricia Rivera, Doris Rosero-García, Carlos Aranaga, Adriana Correa, and Aura Falco. 2022. "Beta-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from Landfill Leachates" Pathogens 11, no. 10: 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11101077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop