Cross-Sectional Study on the Association between Dietary Patterns and Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Conservative Treatment
by
, ,
Hiroyuki Inoshita
1,*
,
Daisuke Asaoka
2,
Kei Matsuno
3,
Naotake Yanagisawa
4,
Yusuke Suzuki
5 and
Katsumi Miyauchi
6 1
Department of Nephrology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan
2
Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan
3
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan
4
Medical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
5
Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
6
Department of Cardiology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(23), 4994; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234994
Submission received: 21 October 2023
/
Revised: 21 November 2023
/
Accepted: 29 November 2023
/
Published: 1 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Malnutrition and Sarcopenia in Older Adults)
Abstract
:Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Adequate dietary patterns are important for preventing sarcopenia; however, evidence regarding the underlying association between sarcopenia and diet is insufficient. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and dietary patterns in CKD patients receiving conservative treatment. In this cross-sectional study, 441 patients with conservative CKD were examined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia diagnostic criteria. CKD was defined as an eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 present for >3 months. The participants were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, and dietary patterns were compared between the two groups using the dietary variety score, a simple dietary survey method that investigates the weekly frequency of consumption of 10 food groups. Logistic regression analysis for CKD G3 showed that female sex (odds ratio (OR): 0.166, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.086–0.320), increased body mass index (OR: 0.663, 95% CI: 0.590–0.745), and almost daily consumption of green/yellow vegetables (OR: 0.350, 95% CI: 0.176–0.695) were positively associated with non-sarcopenia. Although further prospective studies are required, the results suggest that low frequent consumption of vegetables is associated with sarcopenia in patients with CKD.
1. Introduction
Sarcopenia is the loss of skeletal muscle mass and physical function that occurs with advancing age. This issue is especially significant in aging societies, such as Japan, as it profoundly affects the quality of life of the elderly, leading to increased susceptibility to immobility, falls, and hospitalizations and ultimately to higher mortality rates [1].
The term “sarcopenia” was coined by Rosenberg in 1989, and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) subsequently proposed diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia using walking speed, grip strength, and muscle mass as indicators [2]. However, due to skeletal differences between Europeans and Asians, there was a need for sarcopenia diagnostic criteria specific to Asians. Therefore, the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) was established in 2013 and proposed the first diagnostic criteria for Asians. These criteria were revised in 2019 and are currently used in Asia [3]. Specifically, grip strength measurements assess muscle strength, 6 m walk speed evaluates physical performance, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are used to measure skeletal muscle mass, investigating the presence of skeletal muscle loss. A diagnosis of sarcopenia is made when low muscle mass is combined with either low muscle strength or low physical performance. Instead of the 6 m walk test, the five-time chair stand test or the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, which includes three tasks (walking, sit-to-stand, and standing balance), may be used.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) in 2002. As CKD progresses, it often leads to end-stage kidney disease, requiring treatments like dialysis or kidney transplantation. Furthermore, it increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, in addition to culminating in mortality. The prevalence of CKD is growing not just in Japan but worldwide, making prevention crucial. Lifestyle improvements are key in managing CKD. Nutritional and dietary counseling, especially about protein and sodium intake, are vital, and dietitians play a pivotal role in slowing kidney function decline.
Several studies have reported that CKD is associated with sarcopenia. According to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the appendicular lean mass index (ALMI) in patients with stage G4 CKD is 2.58-fold lower than that in non-CKD patients, as measured by DXA [4]. Among Japanese patients with conservative CKD, 57.3% exhibit a diminished ALMI, with 25% concurrently suffering from sarcopenia [5]. Furthermore, the presence of sarcopenia is closely linked to increased mortality rates in CKD patients; therefore, it is important to explore the relationship between sarcopenia and CKD [6]. The precise mechanisms underlying the association between renal dysfunction and muscle weakness remain unclear. However, it has been postulated that factors such as stringent dietary constraints, uremic toxins, inflammation, endocrine disorders, and metabolic acidosis collectively influence protein synthesis, protein degradation, and nerve–muscle integrity, culminating in the loss of muscle mass and strength [7,8]. In particular, several reports indicate that protein-restricted diets can delay the progression of renal function deterioration, but there are also reports that excessive protein restriction contributes to sarcopenia in elderly patients with CKD [9,10,11].
Certain nutrients and dietary patterns have been shown to prevent age-related decline in muscle strength and function. Several studies have identified correlations between the consumption of milk-based products, adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, and adoption of plant-based diets with reduced rates of muscle strength decline and impaired physical function [12,13,14,15]. For example, Kim et al. studied the relationship between vegetable and fruit consumption and the occurrence of sarcopenia in older individuals. They used cross-sectional data and focused on a community-dwelling cohort of men and women aged 65 and older. The findings revealed that, in men, consuming vegetables, fruits, or both was significantly associated with a reduced risk of sarcopenia. For women, higher fruit consumption correlated with a lower risk of sarcopenia [13]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the relationship between muscle strength and dietary patterns among CKD patients.
Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia and dietary patterns among patients with CKD, particularly elderly patients.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Participants
This study involved a post hoc analysis of data derived from a previously performed cross-sectional study: the JUSTICE-TOKYO (JUntendo Sarcopenia Region for Exploring Predictors and Prognosis in the Elderly in TOKYO) study (n = 1078) (UMIN0000 43133). The JUSTICE-TOKYO study was a single-center prospective observational study that included elderly patients selected from a large cohort of outpatients at our center. It was conducted to explore the clinical significance of frailty and sarcopenia. The JUSTICE-TOKYO study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the hospital ethics committee. All participants provided informed consent forms and signed them prior to enrollment in the study. The registration process of the study involved recording the patients’ profiles, medical histories, blood test results, physical and skeletal muscle mass measurements, physiological function test results, and nutritional assessment results. Data were entered prospectively into Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap, version 12.5.9), a web-based software solution that allows researchers to create secure online forms.
Of all participants in the JUSTICE-TOKYO study, 459 with conservative CKD were enrolled in this study. Patients requiring renal replacement therapy were excluded. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 present for >3 months. CKD stages were classified based on the eGFR according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, as follows: stage 3 (CKD G3), 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2; stage 4 (CKD G4), 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2; and stage 5 (CKD G5), <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) calculator without removing the body surface adjustment. Owing to missing data, 18 patients were excluded, and data from the remaining 441 patients were used for the analysis (Figure S1).
2.2. General Assessment
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing body weight by the square of body height, expressed in meters (kg/m2). The Brinkman index score was determined by multiplying the number of cigarettes smoked per day by the number of years the individual has smoked. Drinking frequency was categorized as rarely, 1–4 days per week, or 5–7 days per week. Alcohol consumption was assigned values: 0 for rarely, 1 for 1–4 days per week, and 2 for 5–7 days per week. The average alcohol consumption was then calculated. Information regarding ongoing/history of disease, Brinkman index, and alcohol consumption was obtained through interviews conducted by the chief physician of outpatient services across various internal medicine departments (gastroenterology, cardiology, respiratory medicine, and rheumatology). Blood pressure measurements were manually performed by a nurse at our center, either on the left or right upper arm.
2.3. Laboratory Parameters
Morning blood samples were collected after an overnight fast. The samples were then divided and injected into blood collection tubes, which were transported to the Department of Clinical Laboratory at our center within 20 min. Serum creatinine, serum sodium, serum potassium, serum chloride, serum albumin, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were analyzed using certified methods.
2.4. Definition of Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia was defined using the diagnostic algorithm recommended by the AWGS 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment [3], which assesses the presence of low muscle function (low muscle strength or low physical performance) and low muscle mass, as mentioned above.
In the present study, subjects ≥ 65 years old were considered to have sarcopenia if they exhibited low appendicular skeletal muscle mass with either low handgrip strength or slow gait speed. Handgrip strength, gait speed, and muscle mass were measured. Handgrip strength was measured using a handgrip dynamometer (Toei Light Co. Ltd., Saitama, Japan). Both hands were tested twice with a 30 s rest between measurements, and the highest value was recorded as maximum muscle strength. Low grip strength was determined according to the sex-specific cutoff for maximum muscle strength according to the AWGS criteria (<18 kg in women and <28 kg in men). To assess physical performance through gait speed, a 6 m walk test was administered. Participants were instructed to walk as quickly as possible along a flat, straight path within the hospital. The time required to cover the 6 m was manually recorded using a stopwatch. Slow gait speed was defined as gait speed < 1.0 m/s according to the AWGS criteria. Regional fat mass and lean mass were measured using whole-body DXA (Prodigy Advance, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA). Participants were positioned for whole-body scans in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole-body fat mass and lean mass were divided into several regions, including the arms, legs, and trunk. Appendicular lean mass was estimated as the sum of the lean mass of the upper and lower limbs. The appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated as appendicular lean mass divided by the square of height (kg/m2). Low appendicular skeletal muscle mass was defined as SMI < 5.4 kg/m2 in women and <7.0 kg/m2 in men.
2.5. Nutritional Evaluation
Various methods are used to evaluate dietary patterns. However, as food culture differs from country to country, it is necessary to use an evaluation method that reflects the dietary habits of the Japanese. Therefore, dietary patterns were assessed using the dietary variety score (DVS) [16]. The DVS is a commonly employed metric for assessing the diversity of food intake in Japan’s elderly population and has been observed to be associated with physical function, body composition, risk of falls, and sarcopenia in older adults [17,18,19,20]. A survey was administered to determine the frequency of the consumption of 10 food groups, including fish/shellfish, meat, eggs, milk, soy products, green/yellow vegetables (GYV), seaweed, fruits, potatoes, and fats/oils. A score of 1 was assigned for “almost every day”, while a score of 0 was given for “once every 2 days”, “once or twice a week”, or “almost never”. The DVS was calculated as the sum of the scores for all 10 food items, with a maximum achievable score of 10. Participants provided their own responses to the questionnaire.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Age, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), eGFR, serum sodium, serum potassium, serum chloride, serum albumin, HbA1c, SMI, grip strength, gait speed, and DVS were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Female sex, the proportion of patients with CKD G3, CKD G4-5, smoking, drinking, history of MI, and history of stroke were presented as percentages. Smoking was defined as a Brinkman index ≥ 400. Drinking was defined as consuming alcohol one or more times per week. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test was used for continuous variables. Additionally, multivariate cross-sectional logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the associations between different variables and sarcopenia, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated. Multicollinearity was examined for robustness begore the regression analysis. K-means cluster analysis, an unsupervised machine learning algorithm, was applied to group patients from both groups into clusters based on their DVS. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
Table 1 presents the characteristics of the study participants in both the overall group and the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia subgroups. The average age of the overall population was 79.7 ± 5.9 years, and 54.9% of the participants were women. Moreover, 93.2% of the participants had CKD G3. The mean concentrations of serum sodium, potassium, chloride, and albumin were all within reference values. Among all participants, 100 (22.7%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. In the sarcopenia group, SMI was 5.02 ± 0.34 kg/m2 in women and 6.17 ± 0.63 kg/m2 in men. Grip strength was 16.4 ± 3.1 kg in women and 26.7 ± 5.9 kg in men, while gait speed was 0.9 ± 0.3 m/s. When comparing the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia subgroups, the sarcopenia group was characterized by significantly older age and larger proportion of smokers and patients with a history of stroke. Conversely, the non-sarcopenia group had notably larger proportions of women and patients with CKD G3, and the BMI, DBP, and serum albumin levels in this group were higher than those in the sarcopenia group. Notably, no significant differences in DVS were observed between the two groups.
Table 2 presents the results of the univariate analysis of the consumption of each food item, such as fish, meat, eggs, and others, between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. The proportion of patients who reported consuming GYV “almost daily” (score: 1) was significantly larger in the non-sarcopenia group (54.0% vs. 70.4%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the consumption of other food items between the groups. Subsequent logistic regression analysis with sarcopenia as the dependent variable and age, proportion of women, BMI, DBP, eGFR, serum albumin level, HbA1c, smoking status, stroke, and DVS for each food group as independent variables was performed. The results of the analysis are presented in Table 3 and Figure S2. Advanced age (OR: 1.093, 95% CI: 1.036–1.152) and increased HbA1c levels (OR: 1.728, 95% CI: 1.160–2.574) were associated with sarcopenia. Among dietary patterns, only consuming GYV almost daily was associated with non-sarcopenia (OR: 0.414, 95% CI: 0.212–0.806).
Next, since the population included in this study consisted mostly of CKD G3 patients (93.2%), the analysis was divided into CKD G3 and CKD G4-5 patients by stage, taking into account the impact of CKD G4-5 patients on the overall results. In terms of patient background, the sarcopenia group had a significantly lower proportion of women, BMI, and serum albumin levels among patients with CKD G3 (Table 4). No significant differences in DVS were found between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups among those patients. When the 10 foods based on DVS were analyzed by CKD stage (Table 5), a significantly higher percentage of CKD G3 patients in the non-sarcopenia group consumed GYV almost daily (54.7% vs. 70.8%, p = 0.005), while no significant difference was found between the groups in CKD G4-5 patients. Therefore, a multivariate analysis was performed on CKD G3 patients only, and as shown in Table 6, frequent intake of GYV was statistically significantly associated with non-sarcopenia (OR: 0.350, 95% CI: 0.176–0.695), similar to the results for CKD overall.
To assess the dietary patterns of individuals with and without sarcopenia, k-means cluster analysis was conducted in both groups among participants with CKD G3 only. After careful deliberation, a reasonably large three-cluster solution (>10% of the sample size) was chosen. Table 7 presents the results of the analysis. The results in both groups indicated that the cluster characterized by a lower DVS was designated as “low”, the one with a moderate DVS was labeled as “moderate”, and the cluster with a higher DVS was denoted as “high” (Table 7). In the sarcopenia group, the “low” cluster was most prevalent, followed by “moderate” and “high” (n = 32, n = 27, and n = 26, respectively). Among patients in the non-sarcopenia group, the most common cluster was “low”, followed by “moderate” and “high” (n = 165, n = 92, and n = 68, respectively; Table 7). When comparing the “low” cluster between the two groups in terms of DVS and consumption of each food item, the non-sarcopenia group had a significantly larger proportion of patients who consumed milk (25.0% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.037), fruits (0.0% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.001), and GYV (21.9% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.001) almost daily. Additionally, the DVS in the non-sarcopenia group was higher than that in the sarcopenia group (1.28 ± 1.30 vs. 2.26 ± 1.28, p < 0.001). Conversely, the sarcopenia group had a significantly larger proportion of individuals who consumed eggs (15.6% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.001) almost daily.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we examined 441 patients diagnosed with CKD (mean age: 79.7 ± 5.9 years, eGFR: 48.1 ± 11.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) to investigate the association between sarcopenia and dietary patterns. Initially, we divided the participants into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. Our analysis aimed to identify disparities in DVS and dietary patterns between the two groups. We found no significant differences in the DVS between these groups; however, a notably higher frequency of GYV consumption was observed in the non-sarcopenia group.
Subsequently, a k-means cluster analysis was conducted, classifying patients in both groups into three distinct clusters based on their DVS: “low”, “moderate”, and “high”. The “low” cluster, which had the lowest DVS, included the largest proportion of patients from both groups. The proportion of patients who reported consuming GYV, as well as eggs, milk, and fruits almost daily, was significantly lower in the “low” cluster of the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group. Our results suggest that consuming a varied diet, particularly one rich in GYV, is associated with a lower risk of sarcopenia.
Protein restriction has been considered renoprotective and is a standard treatment for CKD [21,22]. However, excessive protein restriction has been linked to muscle weakness, leading to discussions about relaxing such restrictions in CKD patients with sarcopenia [23]. Thus, treating these patients presents a dilemma: protein restriction decreases the risk of worsening renal function but increases the risk of sarcopenia.
It is commonly believed that plant-based diets are deficient in essential amino acids, but a study has shown that this is not necessarily the case [24]. For example, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) in Oxford and the California Seventh-Day Adventist cohorts have shown that a balanced and diverse plant-based diet is nutritionally adequate and beneficial [25,26]. Patients with CKD G3-4 who consumed a vegan diet consisting of a combination of cereals and legumes, pre-constituted to contain all essential amino acids, showed no signs of nutritional deficiency 13 months post-assessment [27], and it has been suggested that a Mediterranean Diet, high in vegetables, legumes, and cereals, may help slow CKD progression and prevent complications [28]. In our study, multivariate analysis revealed a higher frequency of GYV and soy product intake in the non-sarcopenia group. However, no differences in fish, meat, egg, or milk intake were observed between the two groups. These findings do not fully support a vegan diet but do suggest that a well-balanced plant-based diet might mitigate muscle weakness and decrease the risk of renal function decline and sarcopenia, while adhering to protein restrictions.
The protective effects of vegetable-based diets on muscle strength are not fully understood; however, one theory posits that alkaline diets, such as those rich in vegetables, counteract metabolic acidosis linked to muscle wasting, thereby preserving muscle mass. Some studies have provided evidence supporting this hypothesis, such as a randomized controlled trial of 162 healthy individuals over 50 years old showing that sodium bicarbonate supplementation improved leg press power in women [29]. A longitudinal cohort study of 384 individuals aged 65 years and older found that a diet high in potassium and low in dietary acid load could preserve muscle mass [30]. Additionally, a cross-sectional study of 2176 Japanese women aged 65–94 years indicated that a higher dietary acid load was positively associated with frailty [31]. The International Olympic Committee recognizes sodium bicarbonate as a supplement with substantial evidence for enhancing performance in certain scenarios [32]. While the precise mechanisms by which vegetable-based diets affect muscle mass and counter sarcopenia and frailty require further research, existing evidence highlights their potential importance. Randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these relationships and elucidate their underlying mechanisms.
This study has several limitations that should be considered. First, the cross-sectional design has inherent limitations in establishing causal relationships. Therefore, prospective investigations are imperative for validating the causal link between sarcopenia and dietary factors in the elderly population. Second, most participants (>90%) had CKD G3, with only a small subset (6.8%) having CKD G4-5. Given the need to manage potassium-rich foods and the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD, our study did not find evidence to suggest that a plant-based diet, particularly one involving vegetables and fruits, significantly increased the risk of hyperkalemia. The present study did not investigate whether the presence of comorbidities or other medical conditions among participants influenced dietary choices. It cannot be ruled out that these factors may have had an impact on dietary patterns. Consequently, our findings may not be generalizable to all patients with CKD. Lastly, our study focused only on dietary patterns and did not evaluate the daily nutritional intake of the participants; thus, total calorie and protein intake cannot be determined solely from the DVS. To our knowledge, no other report has explored the relationship between dietary patterns and sarcopenia in elderly patients with conservative CKD. Dietary patterns were assessed through a questionnaire, which healthcare professionals or dietitians can easily and objectively evaluate. The findings suggest that dietary diversity could be a key factor in the nutritional assessment and dietary support for elderly CKD patients with sarcopenia. This warrants further improvement in follow-up study designs.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study examined the association between dietary patterns and sarcopenia in 441 patients with CKD. The results suggest the potential of frequent GYV consumption to mitigate the risk of sarcopenia. Future prospective and interventional studies are warranted to analyze the causal relationship between vegetable-based diets and the risk of sarcopenia.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15234994/s1, Figure S1: Results of the logistic regression analysis related to factors associated with sarcopenia; Figure S2: Profile of three dietary patterns identified by cluster analysis in both sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups.
Author Contributions
H.I. wrote the original draft; H.I., D.A., N.Y. and K.M. (Katsumi Miyauchi) were responsible for data curation; H.I., D.A., K.M. (Kei Matsuno), Y.S. and K.M. (Katsumi Miyauchi) were involved in subject recruitment and study discussions; Y.S. and K.M. (Katsumi Miyauchi) provided supervision; and D.A., Y.S. and K.M. (Katsumi Miyauchi) reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study received grants from JSPS KAKENHI (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, JP21K11633 and JP16K09042). The corresponding author has the final responsibility of submitting the paper for publication.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study involved a post hoc analysis of data derived from a previously performed cross-sectional study: the JUSTICE-TOKYO (JUntendo Sarcopenia Region for Exploring Predictors and Prognosis in the Elderly in TOKYO (n = 1078)) study (UMIN0000 43133). The JUSTICE-TOKYO study was a single-center prospective observational study that included elderly patients selected from a large cohort of outpatients at our center; it was conducted to explore the clinical significance of frailty and sarcopenia. The JUSTICE-TOKYO study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the hospital ethics committee.
Informed Consent Statement
All participants were provided with informed consent forms, and they signed them prior to enrollment in the JUSTICE-TOKYO study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the participants for their cooperation. Furthermore, we would like to thank Mutsuko Hatanaka and Ryoko Yamaguchi (Secretaries of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center) for their support.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Clark, B.C.; Manini, T.M. Functional consequences of sarcopenia and dynapenia in the elderly. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2010, 13, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Baeyens, J.P.; Bauer, J.M.; Boirie, Y.; Cederholm, T.; Landi, F.; Martin, F.C.; Michel, J.P.; Rolland, Y.; Schneider, S.M.; et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010, 39, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, T.W.; Chou, M.Y.; Iijima, K.; Jang, H.C.; Kang, L.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 300–307.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, D.; Hawkins, M.; Abramowitz, M.K. Association of sarcopenia with eGFR and misclassification of obesity in adults with CKD in the United States. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ishikawa, S.; Naito, S.; Iimori, S.; Takahashi, D.; Zeniya, M.; Sato, H.; Nomura, N.; Sohara, E.; Okado, T.; Uchida, S.; et al. Loop diuretics are associated with greater risk of sarcopenia in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, A.; Ishida, J.; Endo, Y.; Takita, T.; Furuhashi, M.; Maruyama, Y.; Odamaki, M. Association of abdominal visceral adiposity and thigh sarcopenia with changes of arteriosclerosis in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 1967–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, S.; Nathan, J.A.; Goldberg, A.L. Muscle wasting in disease: Molecular mechanisms and promising therapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatino, A.; Cuppari, L.; Stenvinkel, P.; Lindholm, B.; Avesani, C.M. Sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease: What have we learned so far? J. Nephrol. 2021, 34, 1347–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cianciaruso, B.; Pota, A.; Pisani, A.; Torraca, S.; Annecchini, R.; Lombardi, P.; Capuano, A.; Nazzaro, P.; Bellizzi, V.; Sabbatini, M. Metabolic effects of two low protein diets in chronic kidney disease stage 4-5--a randomized controlled trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2008, 23, 636–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, B.; Su, X.; Xu, B.; Qiao, X.; Wang, L. Effect of diet protein restriction on progression of chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watanabe, D.; Machida, S.; Matsumoto, N.; Shibagaki, Y.; Sakurada, T. Age Modifies the Association of Dietary Protein Intake with All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Lee, Y. Frequency of dairy consumption and functional disability in older persons. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2011, 15, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Lee, Y.; Kye, S.; Chung, Y.S.; Kim, K.M. Association of vegetables and fruits consumption with sarcopenia in older adults: The Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Age Ageing 2015, 44, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kojima, N.; Kim, M.; Saito, K.; Yoshida, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Hirano, H.; Obuchi, S.; Shimada, H.; Suzuki, T.; Kim, H. Lifestyle-related factors contributing to decline in knee extension strength among elderly women: A cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zbeida, M.; Goldsmith, R.; Shimony, T.; Vardi, H.; Naggan, L.; Shahar, D.R. Mediterranean diet and functional indicators among older adults in non-Mediterranean and Mediterranean countries. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2014, 18, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumagai, S.; Watanabe, S.; Shibata, H.; Amano, H.; Fujiwara, Y.; Shinkai, S.; Yoshida, H.; Suzuki, T.; Yukawa, H.; Yasumura, S.; et al. Effects of dietary variety on declines in high-level functional capacity in elderly people living in a community. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 2003, 50, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, J.; Suzuki, T.; Kumagai, S.; Shinkai, S.; Yukawa, H. Risk factors for dietary variety decline among Japanese elderly in a rural community: A 8-year follow-up study from TMIG-LISA. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 60, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yokoyama, Y.; Nishi, M.; Murayama, H.; Amano, H.; Taniguchi, Y.; Nofuji, Y.; Narita, M.; Matsuo, E.; Seino, S.; Kawano, Y.; et al. Dietary Variety and Decline in Lean Mass and Physical Performance in Community-Dwelling Older Japanese: A 4-year Follow-Up Study. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2017, 21, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouzuki, M.; Tanaka, N.; Miyamoto, M.; Urakami, K. Suggestions on the ideal method of conducting community screenings for older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2023, 23, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojima, N.; Kim, M.; Saito, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Hirano, H.; Obuchi, S.; Shimada, H.; Suzuki, T.; Iwasa, H.; Kim, H. Effects of Daily Consumption of Soy Products on Basic/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Community-Dwelling Japanese Women Aged 75 Years and Older: A 4-Year Cohort Study. Womens Health Rep. 2023, 4, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeller, K.; Whittaker, E.; Sullivan, L.; Raskin, P.; Jacobson, H.R. Effect of restricting dietary protein on the progression of renal failure in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 324, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klahr, S.; Breyer, J.A.; Beck, G.J.; Dennis, V.W.; Hartman, J.A.; Roth, D.; Steinman, T.I.; Wang, S.R.; Yamamoto, M.E. Dietary protein restriction, blood pressure control, and the progression of polycystic kidney disease. Modification of diet in Renal Disease Study Group. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1995, 5, 2037–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isaka, Y. Optimal protein intake in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients with sarcopenia: An overview. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramarao, P.B.; Norton, H.W.; Johnson, B.C. The amino acids composition and nutritive value of proteins. V. Amino acid requirements as pattern for protein evaluation. J. Nutr. 1964, 82, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosell, M.; Appleby, P.; Key, T. Height, age at menarche, body weight and body mass index in life-long vegetarians. Public Health Nutr. 2005, 8, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tharrey, M.; Mariotti, F.; Mashchak, A.; Barbillon, P.; Delattre, M.; Fraser, G.E. Patterns of plant and animal protein intake are strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality: The Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 47, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barsotti, G.; Morelli, E.; Cupisti, A.; Meola, M.; Dani, L.; Giovannetti, S. A low-nitrogen low-phosphorus Vegan diet for patients with chronic renal failure. Nephron 1996, 74, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cases, A.; Cigarrán-Guldrís, S.; Mas, S.; Gonzalez-Parra, E. Vegetable-Based Diets for Chronic Kidney Disease? It Is Time to Reconsider. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson-Hughes, B.; Castaneda-Sceppa, C.; Harris, S.S.; Palermo, N.J.; Cloutier, G.; Ceglia, L.; Dallal, G.E. Impact of supplementation with bicarbonate on lower-extremity muscle performance in older men and women. Osteoporos. Int. 2010, 21, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson-Hughes, B.; Harris, S.S.; Ceglia, L. Alkaline diets favor lean tissue mass in older adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataya, Y.; Murakami, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Suga, H.; Sasaki, S.; Three-generation Study of Women on Diets and Health Study Group. Higher dietary acid load is associated with a higher prevalence of frailty, particularly slowness/weakness and low physical activity, in elderly Japanese women. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1639–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maughan, R.J.; Burke, L.M.; Dvorak, J.; Larson-Meyer, D.E.; Peeling, P.; Phillips, S.M.; Rawson, E.S.; Walsh, N.P.; Garthe, I.; Geyer, H.; et al. IOC consensus statement: Dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Characteristics of participants stratified by sarcopenia status (n = 441).
| Overall (n = 441) | Sarcopenia (n = 100) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 341) | p-Value * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 79.7 ± 5.9 | 81.6 ± 5.7 | 79.2 ± 5.8 | <0.001 | |
| Female, n (%) | 242 (54.9) | 34 (34.0) | 208 (61) | <0.001 | |
| CKD G3, n (%) | 411 (93.2) | 86 (86.0) | 325 (95.3) | 0.001 | |
| CKD G4-5, n (%) | 30 (6.8) | 14 (14.0) | 16 (4.7) | 0.001 | |
| BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | 23.2 ± 3.7 | 20.8 ± 3.6 | 23.9 ± 3.4 | <0.001 | |
| SBP, mean ± SD, mmHg | 137.9 ± 19.3 | 136.0 ± 18.8 | 138.5 ± 19.5 | 0.246 | |
| DBP, mean ± SD, mmHg | 77.4 ± 12.2 | 75.0 ± 12.7 | 78.0 ± 12.0 | 0.027 | |
| eGFR, mean ± SD, mL/min/1.73m2 | 48.1 ± 11.0 | 46.5 ± 13.1 | 48.6 ± 10.3 | 0.145 | |
| Na, mean ± SD, mmol/L | 141.4 ± 2.5 | 141.1 ± 2.8 | 141.5 ± 2.4 | 0.125 | |
| K, mean ± SD, mmol/L | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 0.983 | |
| Cl, mean ± SD, mmol/L | 104.3 ± 3.0 | 104.1 ± 3.8 | 104.3 ± 2.7 | 0.559 | |
| Albumin, mean ± SD, g/dL | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 0.034 | |
| HbA1c, mean ± SD, % | 6.1 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 6.1 ± 0.8 | 0.326 | |
| Smoking (BI > 400), n (%) | 147 (33.3) | 45 (45.0) | 102 (29.9) | 0.005 | |
| Drinking, n (%) | 124 (28.1) | 28 (28.0) | 96 (28.2) | 0.976 | |
| MI, n (%) | 23 (5.2) | 6 (6.0) | 17 (5.0) | 0.688 | |
| Stroke, n (%) | 36 (8.2) | 13 (13.0) | 23 (6.7) | 0.044 | |
| SMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | female | 5.91 ± 0.71 | 5.02 ± 0.34 | 6.05 ± 0.65 | <0.001 |
| male | 6.86 ± 0.82 | 6.17 ± 0.63 | 7.20 ± 0.67 | <0.001 | |
| Grip Strength, mean ± SD, kg | female | 20.1 ± 4.7 | 16.4 ± 3.1 | 20.7 ± 4.7 | <0.001 |
| male | 32.1 ± 7.1 | 26.7 ± 5.9 | 34.8 ± 6.0 | <0.001 | |
| Walking Speed, mean ± SD, m/s | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | |
| DVS, mean ± SD | 3.7 ± 2.2 | 3.4 ± 2.4 | 3.8 ± 2.2 | 0.121 |
* Comparisons with sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups; p < 0.05 considered significant. CKD, chronic kidney disease; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BI, Brinkman index; MI, myocardial infarction; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; DVS, Dietary Variety Score.
Table 2.
Daily consumption proportions across 10 food groups based on DVS.
| Sarcopenia (n = 100) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 341) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fish intake: almost daily, n (%) | 31 (31.0) | 110 (32.3) | 0.813 |
| Meat intake: almost daily, n (%) | 20 (20.0) | 83 (24.3) | 0.367 |
| Eggs intake: almost daily, n (%) | 37 (37.0) | 129 (37.8) | 0.88 |
| Milk intake: almost daily, n (%) | 42 (42.0) | 174 (51.0) | 0.112 |
| Soy products intake: almost daily, n (%) | 34 (34.0) | 150 (44.0) | 0.075 |
| GYV intake: almost daily, n (%) | 54 (54.0) | 240 (70.4) | 0.002 |
| Seaweed intake: almost daily, n (%) | 21 (21.0) | 76 (22.3) | 0.785 |
| Potatoes intake: almost daily, n (%) | 12 (12.0) | 35 (10.3) | 0.621 |
| Fruits intake: almost daily, n (%) | 53 (53.0) | 182 (53.4) | 0.948 |
| Fats/Oils intake: almost daily, n (%) | 40 (40.0) | 128 (37.5) | 0.656 |
p < 0.05 considered significant. DVS, Dietary Variety Score; GYV, green/yellow vegetables.
Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with sarcopenia.
| Variables | OR | 95% CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.093 | 1.036–1.152 | 0.001 |
| Female | 0.210 | 0.103–0.428 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.652 | 0.584–0.728 | <0.001 |
| DBP | 0.990 | 0.966–1.014 | 0.401 |
| eGFR | 0.988 | 0.964–1.013 | 0.345 |
| Albumin | 0.777 | 0.364–1.658 | 0.513 |
| HbA1c | 1.728 | 1.160–2.574 | 0.007 |
| Smoking | 1.136 | 0.570–2.264 | 0.717 |
| Stroke | 1.650 | 0.646–4.217 | 0.295 |
| Fish intake: almost daily | 0.734 | 0.366–1.473 | 0.384 |
| Meat intake: almost daily | 0.763 | 0.365–1.598 | 0.474 |
| Eggs intake: almost daily | 1.319 | 0.709–2.455 | 0.381 |
| Milk intake: almost daily | 0.611 | 0.342–1.093 | 0.097 |
| Soy products intake: almost daily | 0.549 | 0.296–1.019 | 0.057 |
| GYV intake: almost daily | 0.414 | 0.212–0.806 | 0.009 |
| Seaweed intake: almost daily | 1.604 | 0.733–3.511 | 0.237 |
| Potatoes intake: almost daily | 0.921 | 0.344–2.467 | 0.871 |
| Fruits intake: almost daily | 1.362 | 0.752–2.464 | 0.308 |
| Fats/Oils intake: almost daily | 1.203 | 0.662–2.187 | 0.544 |
p < 0.05 considerd significant. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GYV, green/yellow vegetables.
Table 4.
Characteristics of participants stratified by CKD stages and sarcopenia status.
| CKD G3 (n = 411) | CKD G4-5 (n = 30) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcopenia (n = 86) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 325) | p-Value | Sarcopenia (n = 14) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 16) | p-Value | ||
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 81.7 ± 5.3 | 79.1 ± 5.8 | <0.001 | 80.6 ± 7.5 | 80.1 ± 5.9 | 0.837 | |
| Female, n (%) | 28 (32.6) | 198 (60.9) | <0.001 | 6 (42.9) | 10 (62.5) | 0.282 | |
| BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | 20.9 ± 3.0 | 23.8 ± 3.4 | <0.001 | 20.3 ± 6.2 | 25.4 ± 3.7 | 0.010 | |
| SBP, mean ± SD, mmHg | 135.6 ± 18.3 | 138.6 ± 19.1 | 0.188 | 138.1 ± 22.6 | 136.1 ± 26.5 | 0.825 | |
| DBP, mean ± SD, mmHg | 75.5 ± 13.1 | 78.1 ± 12.1 | 0.082 | 71.5 ± 8.7 | 76.1 ± 10.3 | 0.198 | |
| eGFR, mean ± SD, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 50.9 ± 7.0 | 50.1 ± 7.6 | 0.428 | 19.7 ± 9.1 | 17.0 ± 7.5 | 0.380 | |
| Na, mean ± SD, mmol/L | 141.2 ± 2.6 | 141.6 ± 2.3 | 0.244 | 140.1 ± 3.4 | 140.1 ± 2.5 | 0.986 | |
| K, mean ± SD, mmol/L | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 0.592 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 0.744 | |
| Cl, mean ± SD, mmol/L | 104.1 ± 3.2 | 104.3 ± 2.6 | 0.502 | 103.8 ± 6.4 | 103.7 ± 4.0 | 0.958 | |
| Albumin, mean ± SD, g/dL | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 0.044 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 0.238 | |
| HbA1c, mean ± SD, % | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 6.1 ± 0.8 | 0.291 | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 6.3 ± 1.0 | 0.673 | |
| Smoking (BI > 400), n (%) | 39 (45.3) | 95 (29.2) | 0.005 | 6 (42.9) | 7 (43.8) | 0.961 | |
| Drinking, n (%) | 24 (27.9) | 92 (28.3) | 0.941 | 4 (28.6) | 4 (25.0) | 0.825 | |
| MI, n (%) | 3 (3.5) | 15 (4.6) | 0.650 | 3 (21.4) | 2 (12.5) | 0.513 | |
| Stroke, n (%) | 9 (10.5) | 21 (6.5) | 0.204 | 4 (28.6) | 2 (12.5) | 0.272 | |
| SMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | female | 4.97 ± 0.33 | 6.04 ± 0.65 | <0.001 | 5.26 ± 0.26 | 6.32 ± 0.53 | <0.001 |
| male | 6.16 ± 0.62 | 7.21 ± 0.68 | <0.001 | 6.28 ± 0.70 | 7.01 ± 0.44 | 0.044 | |
| Grip Strength, mean ± SD, kg | female | 16.2 ± 2.8 | 20.9 ± 4.7 | <0.001 | 17.3 ± 4.7 | 17.3 ± 2.6 | 0.986 |
| male | 26.5 ± 6.0 | 35.0 ± 5.9 | <0.001 | 28.4 ± 5.4 | 31.2 ± 8.3 | 0.461 | |
| Walking Speed, mean ± SD, m/s | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.458 | |
| DVS, mean ± SD | 3.4 ± 2.4 | 3.8 ± 2.2 | 0.115 | 3.6 ± 2.6 | 3.8 ± 1.8 | 0.837 | |
p < 0.05 considered significant. CKD, chronic kidney disease; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BI, Brinkman index; MI, myocardial infarction; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; DVS, Dietary Variety Score.
Table 5.
Daily consumption proportions across 10 food groups based on DVS among patients with CKD G3 and G4-5.
Table 5.
Daily consumption proportions across 10 food groups based on DVS among patients with CKD G3 and G4-5.
| CKD G3 (n = 411) | CKD G4-5 (n = 30) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcopenia (n = 86) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 325) | p-Value | Sarcopenia (n = 14) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 16) | p-Value | |
| Fish intake: almost daily, n (%) | 27 (31.4) | 104 (32.0) | 0.915 | 4 (28.6) | 6 (37.5) | 0.605 |
| Meat intake: almost daily, n (%) | 15 (17.4) | 78 (24.0) | 0.196 | 5 (35.7) | 5 (31.3) | 0.796 |
| Eggs intake: almost daily, n (%) | 33 (38.4) | 119 (36.6) | 0.764 | 4 (28.6) | 10 (62.5) | 0.630 |
| Milk intake: almost daily, n (%) | 36 (41.9) | 168 (51.7) | 0.105 | 6 (42.9) | 6 (37.5) | 0.765 |
| Soy products intake: almost daily, n (%) | 29 (33.7) | 145 (44.6) | 0.069 | 5 (35.7) | 5 (31.3) | 0.796 |
| GYV intake: almost daily, n (%) | 47 (54.7) | 230 (70.8) | 0.005 | 7 (50.0) | 10 (62.4) | 0.491 |
| Seaweed intake: almost daily, n (%) | 18 (21.0) | 72 (22.1) | 0.807 | 3 (21.4) | 4 (25.0) | 0.818 |
| Potatoes intake: almost daily, n (%) | 10 (11.6) | 33 (10.2) | 0.691 | 2 (14.3) | 2 (12.5) | 0.886 |
| Fruits intake: almost daily, n (%) | 46 (53.5) | 175 (53.8) | 0.953 | 7 (50.0) | 7 (43.8) | 0.732 |
| Fats/Oils intake: almost daily, n (%) | 32 (37.2) | 122 (37.5) | 0.985 | 8 (57.1) | 6 (37.5) | 0.282 |
p < 0.05 considered significant. CKD, chronic kidney disease; DVS, Dietary Variety Score; GYV, green/yellow vegetables.
Table 6.
Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with sarcopenia among participants with CKD G3.
Table 6.
Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with sarcopenia among participants with CKD G3.
| Variables | OR | 95% CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.103 | 1.042–1.167 | 0.001 |
| Female | 0.166 | 0.086–0.320 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.663 | 0.590–0.745 | <0.001 |
| Albumin | 0.628 | 0.255–1.543 | 0.310 |
| Smoking | 2.201 | 1.196–4.050 | 0.011 |
| Fish intake: almost daily | 1.176 | 0.572–2.420 | 0.659 |
| Meat intake: almost daily | 0.548 | 0.244–1.233 | 0.146 |
| Eggs intake: almost daily | 1.198 | 0.618–2.323 | 0.594 |
| Milk intake: almost daily | 0.764 | 0.419–1.390 | 0.594 |
| Soy products intake: almost daily | 0.623 | 0.327–1.187 | 0.150 |
| GYV intake: almost daily | 0.350 | 0.176–0.695 | 0.003 |
| Seaweed intake: almost daily | 1.414 | 0.642–3.114 | 0.389 |
| Potatoes intake: almost daily | 1.604 | 0.580–4.437 | 0.363 |
| Fruits intake: almost daily | 1.417 | 0.744–2.698 | 0.289 |
| Fats/Oils intake: almost daily | 1.294 | 0.690–2.427 | 0.421 |
p < 0.05 considered significant. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GYV, green/yellow vegetables.
Table 7.
Profile of three dietary patterns identified by cluster analysis in sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia group among the patients with CKD G3.
Table 7.
Profile of three dietary patterns identified by cluster analysis in sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia group among the patients with CKD G3.
| Sarcopenia (n = 85) | Non-Sarcopenia (n = 341) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n = 32) | Moderate (n = 27) | High (n = 26) | Low (n = 165) | Moderate (n = 92) | High (n = 68) | p-Value a | p-Value b | p-Value c | |
| Fish intake: almost daily, n (%) | 3 (9.0) | 10 (37.0) | 13 (50.0) | 19 (11.5) | 30 (32.6) | 55 (80.9) | 0.725 | 0.668 | 0.003 |
| Meat intake: almost daily, n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 2(7.4) | 11 (42.3) | 16 (9.7) | 13 (14.1) | 49 (72.1) | 0.226 | 0.355 | 0.007 |
| Eggs intake: almost daily, n (%) | 5 (15.6) | 18 (54.5) | 23 (88.5) | 4 (2.4) | 92 (100.0) | 23 (33.8) | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Milk intake: almost daily, n (%) | 8 (25.0) | 10 (37.0) | 18 (69.2) | 74 (44.8) | 47 (55.3) | 42 (61.8) | 0.037 | 0.199 | 0.500 |
| Soy products intake: almost daily, n (%) | 5 (15.6) | 6 (22.2) | 17 (65.4) | 46 (27.9) | 52 (56.5) | 50 (73.5) | 0.148 | 0.002 | 0.435 |
| GYV intake: almost daily, n (%) | 7 (21.9) | 14 (51.9) | 25 (96.2) | 87 (52.7) | 49 (53.3) | 68 (100.0) | 0.001 | 0.897 | 0.104 |
| Seaweed intake: almost daily, n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 2 (7.4) | 15 (57.7) | 7 (4.2) | 75 (81.5) | 42 (61.8) | 0.770 | <0.001 | 0.718 |
| Potatoes intake: almost daily, n (%) | 2 (6.3) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (26.9) | 6 (3.6) | 23 (25.0) | 17 (25.0) | 0.493 | 0.004 | 0.848 |
| Fruits intake: almost daily, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 27 (100.0) | 19 (73.1) | 66 (40.0) | 10 (10.9) | 54 (79.4) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.510 |
| Fats/Oils intake: almost daily, n (%) | 9 (28.1) | 8 (27.0) | 15 (57.7) | 48 (29.1) | 55 (59.8) | 40 (58.8) | 0.912 | 0.006 | 0.921 |
| DVS, mean ± SD | 1.28 ± 1.30 | 3.11 ± 1.05 | 6.27 ± 1.34 | 2.26 ± 1.28 | 4.70 ± 1.38 | 6.47 ± 1.50 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.551 |
a Compared with “Low” clusters, b compared with “Moderate” clusters, c compared with “High” clusters in sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia group, p < 0.05 was significant; GYV, green/yellow vegetables; DVS, Dietary Variety Score; SD, standard deviation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Inoshita, H.; Asaoka, D.; Matsuno, K.; Yanagisawa, N.; Suzuki, Y.; Miyauchi, K. Cross-Sectional Study on the Association between Dietary Patterns and Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Conservative Treatment. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4994. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234994
AMA Style
Inoshita H, Asaoka D, Matsuno K, Yanagisawa N, Suzuki Y, Miyauchi K. Cross-Sectional Study on the Association between Dietary Patterns and Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Conservative Treatment. Nutrients. 2023; 15(23):4994. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234994
Chicago/Turabian StyleInoshita, Hiroyuki, Daisuke Asaoka, Kei Matsuno, Naotake Yanagisawa, Yusuke Suzuki, and Katsumi Miyauchi. 2023. "Cross-Sectional Study on the Association between Dietary Patterns and Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Conservative Treatment" Nutrients 15, no. 23: 4994. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234994
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
